1. Open Session
      1. 1. Approval of the Agenda
      2. 2. Minutes of the Open Session on January 7, 2013
      3. 3. Business Arising from the Minutes
      4. 4. Report of the Chair
      5. 5. Question Period
      6. 6. Reports of Committees
      7. Motion
      8. Certificate Program, Explorations Program (S.13-23)
      9. Motion
      10. Contemporary Arts (S.13-24)
      11. Motion
      12. iii) Certificate in Business Analytics and Decision Making (S.13-25)
      13. Motion
      14. iv) Joint Major in World Literature and History (S.13-26)
      15. Motion
      16. v) Joint Major in World Literature and International Studies (S.13-27)
      17. Motion
      18. vi) Graduate Certificate in Educational Leadership (S.13-28)
      19. Motion
      20. Motion
      21. E) Senate Nominating Committee (SNC)
      22. 7. Other Business
      23. ii) Reappointment of Vice-President, Academic
      24. 8. Information
      25. i) Date of the next regular meeting – Monday, March 4, 2013.

APPROVED BY SENATE
Minutes of a Meeting of the Senate of Simon Fraser University held on
Monday, February 4, 2013 at 7:00 pm at the West Mall Complex (Room 3210)
Open Session
Present:
Andrew Petter, President and Chair
Birmingham, Elina
Black, Sam
Brandhorst, Bruce
Brennand, Tracy
Burley, David (for J. Pierce)
Corbett, Kitty
Craig, John
Cupples, Claire
Cyr, Dianne
Driver, Jon
Easton, Stephen
Eckman, Charles
Elle, Elizabeth
Flodr, Sarah-Sophia
Francis, June
Geisler, Cheryl
Hall, Angie
Hedley, Nick
Jozaghi, Ehsan
Kopahi, Moe
Kropinski, Mary Catherine
Kwon, Caleb
Laitsch, Dan
Leacock, Tracey
Leznoff, Daniel
Li, Paul
Magnusson, Kris
McRae, Jennifer
Myers, Gordon
O’Neil, John
Parekh, Nimisha
Parkhouse, Wade
Paterson, David
Pavsek, Christopher
Percival, Colin
Percival, Paul
Perry, Tom
Pinto, Mario
Quarmby, Lynne
Kate Ross, Registrar and Executive Director, Student Enrolment
Kris Nordgren, Recording Secretary
Rajapakse, Nimal
Robinsmith, Stacey
Schellenberg, Betty
Somers, Julian
Szeto, Hendson
Tingling, Peter
Warner, D’Arcy
Wussow, Helen
Absent:
Chapman, Glenn
Chen, Alexander
Delgrande, Jim
Golnaraghi, Farid
Gordon, Robert
Kessler, Anke
Leivdal, Joseph
Lundgreen-Nielsen, Jens
Palis, Heather
Pilarinos, Andreas
Ruben, Peter
Sakhrani, Rohan
Shapiro, Daniel
Shaw, Chris
Taylor, Carole
Wilson, Meaghan
Woodbury, Rob
Zhang, Kevin
In Attendance:
Brayne, Robin
Budra, Paul
Clossey, Luke
Gemino, Andrew
Hinchliffe, Jo
Hirsch, Gail
Kitsos, Robert
Rahilly, Tim
Seigneurie, Ken

S.M. February 4, 2013
Page 2
1.
Approval of the Agenda
The agenda was approved as distributed.
2.
Minutes of the Open Session on January 7, 2013
The minutes of the open session on January 7, 2013 were approved with a minor amendment to
the list of attendees.
3.
Business Arising from the Minutes
There was no business arising from the minutes.
4.
Report of the Chair
The Chair welcomed the new Faculty Senator, Elina Birmingham and then provided an update on
several items.
The Chair reported on the British Columbia Labour Market Profile recently released by the
Research Universities’ Council of BC, which emphasized a net skills shortage within three years
and the call for 11,000 new university, college and trades spaces.
The Chair reported on SFU’s research success over the past year as evidenced by the recent
announcement of the new BC Leadership Chair in Multimodal Technology for Healthcare
Innovations, Dr. Ryan D’Arcy – an SFU neuroscientist. D'Arcy will combine health research and
technology by linking the Faculty of Applied Sciences at SFU with the medical expertise at
Surrey Memorial Hospital and elsewhere in the Fraser Health region.
SFU received Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) funding of $7.7 million for the
Prometheus Project, a joint project of BCIT, UBC, UVIC and led by SFU; and $1 million in
upgrades to the national ATLAS-Canada data centre at TRIUMF.
5.
Question Period
i)
Response to Questions from Senate (S.13-17).
A question was submitted by a Senator to the Chair in December 2012 regarding SFU’s inter-
collegiate student athletics programs: annual expenditure, athletic scholarships, academic results
of athletes, and the value of NCAA membership to SFU. The VP Academic office provided a
report to Senate in response to the questions.
A question was asked about how the current Athletics’ budget compares to the budget prior to
membership in the NCAA and about plans to defray the costs of subsidizing the program. Senate
was informed that the budget has remained the same and that funds raised by supporters and
alumni would be targeted to the student-athletes.
Clarification was requested regarding the apparent overspending of approximately $300,000
above the base budget of $166,000. The question was deferred because the information was not
included in the document provided to Senate.
A question was asked if Athletics and Recreation fees were subsidizing the Athletics department
budget. Senate was informed that the fees paid by students pay for both recreation and athletics.
Clarification was requested regarding the gender inequity in the distribution of financial aid to
student-athletes. Senate was informed that, under NCAA Title 9, there is a requirement for

S.M. February 4, 2013
Page 3
gender equity and that SFU has allocated funds specifically to increase financial aid for female
student-athletes.
A question was asked regarding travel cost increases since joining NCAA. Senate was informed
that new schools were added to the Great Northern Athletics Conference, which has resulted in
additional travel costs; however, unlike CIS championships, NCAA championship travel costs are
funded through the association.
A question was asked whether NCAA membership was sufficient in attracting international
student-athletes rather than adding additional scholarship funding. Senate was informed that
recruiting outstanding international athletes, who would pay higher international tuition fees,
requires scholarships that are attractive to these student-athletes.
6.
Reports of Committees
A)
Student Discipline Matters
i)
Annual Report – Non-academic Discipline Incidents (S.13-1a)
Senate received the Student Discipline Matters Annual Report – Non-academic Discipline
Incidents from 2011 to 2012 for information.
Clarification was requested regarding the increase in cases of unauthorized presence. Senate was
informed that each case is unique and that the definition of unauthorized presence has not
changed.
B)
Senate Policy Committee on Scholarships, Awards and Bursaries (SPCSAB)
i)
Annual Report 2011-2012 (S.13-18)
Senate received the Annual Report of the Senate Policy Committee on Scholarships, Awards and
Bursaries (SPCSAB) for the fiscal year 2011-2012 for information.
Clarification was requested regarding the revision in how needs were assessed that resulted in a
drop in total calculated financial need. Senate was informed that the revision was the alignment
of the basic living allowance with other assessment processes to identify students with the highest
need.
Disappointment was expressed at the low value of the Open Scholarship, which has recently been
as high as $110 per unit, and the rationale was requested for setting the unit value of the $70 per
unit when the domestic tuition fee is $167.10 per unit. Senate was informed that SPCSAB works
with a finite budget and is evaluating the unit values. SPCSAB has no say in the allocation of the
budget funds.
C)
Senate Graduate Studies Committee (SGSC)
i)
Graduate General Regulation 1.3.5a (S.13-19)
Motion
Moved by W. Parkhouse, seconded by S. Easton.
“That Senate approve the changes to GGR 1.3.5a Cohort Special Arrangements, effective Fall
2013.”

S.M. February 4, 2013
Page 4
Clarification was requested regarding the nature of cohort special arrangement programs. Senate
was informed that the nature of cohort special arrangement programs have changed over the past
fifteen years, so that a program may be launched as a trial or prototype in order to assess whether
there is interest in creating a permanent program.
A question was asked about the naming conventions for certificates under cohort special
arrangements. Senate was informed that the name would be Graduate Certificate in “X” Under
Special Arrangements.
Question was called and a vote taken.
MOTION CARRIED
ii)
Curriculum Revisions – Faculty of Communication, Art and Technology (S.13-20)
Senate received information that the Senate Graduate Studies Committee, acting under delegated
authority, added new courses in the Faculty of Communication, Art and Technology (School of
Contemporary Arts).
iii)
Curriculum Revisions – Faculty of Education (S.13-21)
Senate received information that the Senate Graduate Studies Committee, acting under delegated
authority, made revisions to existing courses and programs in the Faculty of Education.
iv)
Curriculum Revisions – Faculty of Environment (S.13-22)
Senate received information that the Senate Graduate Studies Committee, acting under delegated
authority, added new courses and made revisions to existing courses in the Faculty of
Environment (Development and Sustainability Program; Department of Geography).
D)
Senate Committee on University Priorities (SCUP)
i)
Suspension of Admission to the Explorations in the Arts and Social Sciences
Certificate Program, Explorations Program (S.13-23)
Motion
Moved by J. Driver, seconded by J. Craig.
“That Senate approve the suspension of admission to the Explorations in the Arts and Social
Sciences Certificate Program in the Explorations Program within the Faculty of Arts and Social
Sciences, effective Fall 2013”
Question was called and a vote taken.
MOTION CARRIED
ii)
Dissolution of the joint Major in Sociology and Art and Culture Studies, School for the
Contemporary Arts (S.13-24)
Motion
Moved by J. Driver, seconded by J. Francis.
“That Senate approve and recommend to the Board of Governors the dissolution of the Joint
Major in Sociology and Art and Culture Studies in the School for the Contemporary Arts within
the Faculty of Communication, Art and Technology, effective Fall 2014.”
Question was called and a vote taken.
MOTION CARRIED

S.M. February 4, 2013
Page 5
iii)
Certificate in Business Analytics and Decision Making (S.13-25)
Motion
Moved by J. Driver, seconded by A. Hall.
“That Senate approve and recommend to the Board of Governors the Full Program Proposal for a
Certificate in Business Analytics and Decision Making within the Beedie School of Business,
effective Fall 2013.”
Question was called and a vote taken.
MOTION CARRIED
iv)
Joint Major in World Literature and History (S.13-26)
Motion
Moved by J. Driver, seconded by J. Craig.
“That Senate approve and recommend to the Board of Governors the Full Program Proposal for a
Joint Major in World Literature and History in the Program in World Literature and Department
of History within the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, effective Fall 2013.”
Question was called and a vote taken.
MOTION CARRIED
v)
Joint Major in World Literature and International Studies (S.13-27)
Motion
Moved by J. Driver, seconded by J. Craig.
“That Senate approve and recommend to the Board of Governors the Full Program Proposal for a
Joint Major in World Literature and International Studies in the Program in World Literature and
School for International Studies within the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, effective Fall
2013.”
Question was called and a vote taken.
MOTION CARRIED
vi)
Graduate Certificate in Educational Leadership (S.13-28)
Motion
Moved by J. Driver, seconded by K. Magnusson.
“That Senate approve and recommend to the Board of Governors the Full Program Proposal for a
Graduate Certificate in Educational Leadership within the Faculty of Education, effective Fall
2013.”
Question was called and a vote taken.
MOTION CARRIED
vii)
Master of Arts in Comparative Media Arts by Cohort Special (S.13-29)
S.M. February 4, 2013
Page 6
Senate received information that the Senate Graduate Studies Committee, acting under delegated
authority, approved the Master of Arts in Comparative Media Arts by Cohort Special
Arrangements, effective Fall 2013.
It was questioned whether eight students in a trial program fits the description of cohort special
arrangements. Senate was informed that three out of seven courses, including the capstone
course, will be taken together with some variation in the courses taken during the program.
vii) Five Year Academic Plan of the Vice-President Academic (S.13-30)
Senate received the Five Year Academic Plan of the Vice-President Academic, 2013 to 2018 for
information.
Clarification was requested regarding the commitment to faculty retention under research
excellence. Senate was informed that research needs of the faculties and teaching needs are both
important criteria in developing the Faculty Renewal Plan.
A question was asked why underserved communities were not addressed in the plan. Senate was
informed that the principle is well-established that underserved communities are targeted during
recruiting and support processes are put in place to ensure they have the best opportunity to
access the University.
A question was asked whether the goals are realistic and achievable given budget constraints.
Senate was informed that the plan provides clarity and direction for allocation of funds as they
become available.
ix)
Report on Learning Outcomes and Assessment (LOA) (S.13.31).
Senate was advised that to frame the discussion of the Report on Learning Outcomes and
Assessment, it was proposed to move into a Committee of the Whole.
Motion
Moved by A. Petter, seconded by S. Easton.
“"That Senate move into a Committee of the Whole for up to an hour for the purpose of a general
discussion and advice on a matter without resolution."
Question was called and a vote taken.
MOTION CARRIED
J. Driver provided a synopsis of the activity that resulted in the report, which was released in the
fall of 2012. The report was made available to the university community and a number of Senate
committees for comment either directly or through the Senate committee minutes. J. Driver
reviewed the report, the supporting documents of the report, and the comments and questions that
had been received during this process, and prepared the response and draft proposal for discussion
at Senate.
A lengthy discussion ensued with arguments for and against LOA, with the following key
concerns: the concept of an audit culture, assessment, and the nature of accountability, both
internal and external; how the processes would be implemented and monitored; the costs and time
required to implement; data collection and use; the language and jargon of learning outcomes and
assessment; and the conflation of issues causing problems in the future.

S.M. February 4, 2013
Page 7
Comments were made from faculties which have already experienced accreditation by external
organizations and have developed learning outcomes within their respective curriculums:
attracting students to the program; flexibility of the accreditor during the process; spreading the
costs over time as curriculum is developed and revised; building connections between courses and
curriculum; and the benefit to students and faculty in terms of the teaching and learning
environment in the University.
Several Senators, students and faculty, expressed positive support for learning outcomes and
assessment. The following comments were made: clear goal setting and syllabi enable students as
well as faculty and external accrediting bodies know what is being taught; accreditation means a
credential from SFU has more value nationally and internationally; and much of the work that
needs to be done is already being done by good instructors.
The concerns were addressed as follows:
The culture of self-assessment, rather than an external audit culture, would be determined by
the discipline that assesses its own outcomes and by colleagues in the same discipline at other
universities. There would not be a standardized system of learning outcomes and assessment;
rather, each discipline would define what is most appropriate for their discipline.
In terms of accountability: internally SFU wants to do the right thing for our students and
colleagues; externally, we want to show that we can assess ourselves and to potentially deflect
any external impositions.
Data gathering would be focused on whether faculty are undertaking the exercise; what the
impact has been on the development of curriculum; and the development of teaching methods
in their academic units.
J. Driver informed Senate that the comments expressed during the Committee of the Whole
would be considered and addressed, and urged Senate to review the recent memo and proposals
and to consider what a mature system might look like and what processes might follow to move
in that direction.
E)
Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies (SCUS)
i)
Curriculum Revisions –– Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (S.13-32)
Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting under
delegated authority, made revisions to an existing course in the Faculty of Arts and Social
Sciences (Political Science).
ii)
Curriculum Revisions – Faculty of Communication, Art and Technology (S.13-33)
Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting under
delegated authority, made revisions to an existing course in the Faculty of Communication, Art
and Technology (School of Interactive Arts and Technology).
iii)
Curriculum Revisions – Faculty of Environment (S.13-34)
Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting under
delegated authority, added a new course in the Faculty of Environment (Geography).

S.M. February 4, 2013
Page 8
iv)
Curriculum Revisions – Faculty of Health Sciences (S.13-35)
Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting under
delegated authority, made revisions to existing courses in the Faculty of Health Sciences.
A question was asked regarding the increase in course hours. Senate was informed that the
question would be taken away for further review.
v)
Curriculum Revisions – Faculty of Science (S.13-36)
Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting under
delegated authority, made changes to existing courses and programs in the Faculty of Science
(Biological Sciences; Molecular Biology and Biochemistry; Mathematics).
A question was asked regarding the number of upper division units required in the Mathematics
Honours program. Senate was informed that the matter would be investigated further.
E) Senate Nominating Committee (SNC)
i) Senate Committee Elections (S.13-37)
Senate received a revised summary from the Senate Nominating Committee of nominations
received and outstanding vacancies for positions on Senate committees that are elected by Senate.
7.
Other Business
i) Election Report (S.13-38)
Senate received a report for information showing the results of a recent faculty election to Senate.
ii) Reappointment of Vice-President, Academic
The Chair congratulated the Vice-President, Academic on his reappointment.
8.
Information
i)
Date of the next regular meeting – Monday, March 4, 2013.
Open session adjourned at 9:51 pm and Senate moved directly into the closed session.
Kate Ross
Registrar & Executive Director Student Enrolment

Back to top