1. :1) SFU KELOWNR SITE OFFICE
      2. Secretary - Donna Stevenson ? 762-7600
      3. Undergraduate Programs ? 291-3643
  1. Simon Fraser University
      1. FACULTY OF EDUCATION ? SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
  2. IS-IR- 15113
      1. THANKYOU
    1. FACULTY OF EDUCATION ?
      1. SPRING 1985

o
.
EDUCATION 406-5 (Group 02)
?
KELOWNA
"LEARNING DISABILITIES"
Instructors: John Bellamy & Ron Rubadeau
Enrolment: 12
Ll
SPRING/86
.
0

CL I MM
1D11C50MM0a)M
?
DWEDE
MOC
H
M EFLDWE UJUflJDTN?
WMOGST WDOMMID
?
pua
NEW STUDENT RNU FORMER STUDENT REQUIRING RE-auMISSlOistudents
who have not completed Simon Fraser University courses within the
last three semesters): flpIication for fidmission or Re-RdmissiOfl is
available at the Kelowna Site Office. The completed fipplicution, with
all official documents (transcripts etc:), should be submitted to the Site
Secretary, Donna Stevenson, on or before January 8, 1986. Please
note that a fee of $25 is assessed all applicants whose academic
records, in whole or in part, originate. outside the Province of British
Columbia.
CONTINUING STUDENT: Students who have not completed
pre-registration procedures may register for the course at the
in-person registration.
IN-PERSON REGISTRRTION: In-person registration will be held at the SFU
46
?
Site Office on Wednesday, January 8, 1986, from 4- 6 p.m.
SFU KELOWNR SITE OFFICE:
Okanagan College
1000 KLO Road
Kelowna, B.C.
MY 4H8
Telephone 762 7600
TU IT ION FEES
Educ. 49E. - 3
Special
Topics: Dance
3 credit hours @ 43.00
?
$129.00
Student Activity Fee
?
13.00
TOTAL ?
$142.00
Educ. 406 - 5 In-Service Practicum
5 credit hours @ 43.00
?
$215.00
Student Activity Fee
?
$13.00
TOTAL
?
$228.00
.1
:1) SFU KELOWNR SITE OFFICE
Secretary - Donna Stevenson
?
762-7600
2) FRCULTY OF EDUCRTION - SFU
Undergraduate Programs
?
291-3643

S
(3up
O-
E1llU1LflTl[O1P 4O6 - 5( Li roup D2): I
?
S[ R1UJI C EIP
ft
111(11
0UJF1I
I t4ISiTiBlJ1IiTtD]R a
Wi
L t I
l
IN
SER
LI I I3E
ILS s\oi fluTiE: Jh n B e I I[olmIqJ
To: Prospective Education 406 Participants
From: Peter Norman, In-Service Coordinator
Date: November 6, 1985
Education 406-5 is
a
new program designed to support teachers
wishing to implement systematic curriculum or instructional projects
in their own classrooms. It is an attempt to find the best possible "fit"
between university coursework and the professional development
needs of teachers. Each section of Education 406 has a special
emphasis and takes advantage of unique opportunities. In this regard,
we are fortunate in working with Ron Rubadeau and John Bellamy to
address the concerns of teachers with special needs students.
John will be working out the schedule of seminars, classroom visits
and special events. In the meantime, please note the registration
procedures outlined on the reverse side. If you have questions, please
do not hesitate to contact Donna Stevenson at the Kelowna Site Office
or Undergraduate Programs on campus.
Sincerely,
9
?
Peter Norman

S
?
.
February 4, 1986
85-1 406-5 Listing
Group
02
Theory and Practice of Implementation
S.
Quiver
Component
Group 03
Problems of Implementation
C.
Hearn
Group
04
Language Arts
M.
Zola
Group
05
Advancing & Improving Educational
?
Practice
S.
Wassermann/
H.
Buchan
86-1 406-5 Listing
Group
02
Learning Disabilities
J.
Bellamy
Group 03
Universal ?
Curriculum
M. Gibbons
Group
04
Advancing and Improving Educational
?
Practice S.
Wassermann/
N.
McAllister
Group
05
Elementary Physical ?
Education
G.
Kirchner
Group
06
Developmental ?
Supervision
P.
Holborn

Back to top


Simon Fraser University
• ?
FACULTY OF EDUCATION
General Information
EDUCT I ONI 406-5
?
PROFESSIONAL IN-SERVICE PRACTICLJM
Calendar Description: (EDUC
406-5] ...
'for practising teachers who wish to
implement new curriculum or instructional techniques in their own classroom, a
supervised practicurn is offered in conjunction with other universit
y
coursework."
Gradin g
: Pass/Withdraw.
EDUC
406-5
provides a structure for teachers to play an active role in defining
the content of their studies using their ownclassroorns as the setting for
professional development.
EDUC
406-5
includes the followin g
components: classroom
work; seminars; and instruction in the theor y
and practice of implementation.
i)
Classroom work : This component recognizes that feedback, coaching,
consultation and other aspects of on-site supervision are important features of
successful
implementation. EDUC
406-5
includes visits b
y
a trained supervisor for
observation and support. (approx.30 hours)
ii)
Seminars : This component provides a forum for teachers to learn
from one another. The seminar is scheduledon a regular basis to monitor
progress, discuss common concerns and solve problems. (10-20 hours)
iii)
Theor
y
and
p
ractice of implementation : - This component allows
teachers to s
y stematicall y
explore school-based implementation and planned change
through scheduled activities like guest speakers, demonstrations and attendance
at related events. (10-20 hours)
Related coursework : EDUC
406-5 is
usuall y
taken in partnership with some other
educational stud
y
. It emphasizes the process of implementation and encourages
teachers to identify relevant content unique to their needs. A fourth component
is thus implied; systematic educational stud y
like recent or concurrent
universit y
coursework.
Undergraduate Programs
Facult y
of Education
Simon Fraser University

M Monday ?
S
T= Tuesday
W
R
=
= Thursday
Wednesday
?
Faculty of Education
F•Friday ?
UNDERGRADUATE COURSE OFFERINGS
Spring 1985
(January 7th to April 4th, 1984)
Oct. 26/84
Tentative
List ing
?
220-3 ?
Psychological Issues in Education
?
230-3 ?
Introduction to Philosophy of
Education
?
240-3 ?
Social Issues in Education
?
325-3 ?
Measurement and Evaluation
in Teaching
?
326-3 ?
Classroom Management and
Discipline
?
330-3 ?
Critical History of Educational
Thought
Lec. T, R 10:30-11:20
+ 1 hr. tutorial per week
Room B 9201
Lec. M, W 12:30-13:20
+ 1 hr. tutorial per week
Room AQ 3105
Lec. T, R 11:30-12:20
+ 1 hr. tutorial per week
Room B 9200
R 16:30-19:20
Room MPX 7506
W 16:30-19:20
Room MPX 9511-12
Correspondence
W 16:30-19:20
Room MPX 7506
B. Hiebert
A. Kazepides
M. Manley-Casimir
M. Marshall
P. Crehan
B.
Hiebert
R. Barrow
?
361-3 ?
Contemporary Issues and New ?
W 16:30-19:20 ?
M. Wideen
Developments in Educational
?
Room MPX 8620
Practice (Problems of Implementation)
?
406-0 ?
Professional In-Service Practicum
Group
01
Care
s practicum is designed for teachers who
required to meet B.C. certification
uirements. Permission of the Director
Professional Programs is required.
Group 02
?
?
This field based experience is designed for
) teachers currently teaching in a lower
mainland school district. Permission of the
?
S.
?
Director of Undergraduate Programs is
?
\ ?
required.
Group 03 ?
J ?
This field based experience is designed for
?
/
?
teachers currently teaching in the Kamloops
?
/
/
??
of
school
Undergraduate
district.
Programs
Permission
is
of
required.
the Director
• ?
Group 04
?
This field based experience is designed for
I ?
teachers currently teaching in the Surrey
School District. Permission of the Director
of Undergraduate Programs is required.
. ?
. ?
.2
(over)

-2-
406-0
Professional
?
In-Service Practicum
Group 05
This field-based experience
is designed
for teachers currently teaching
in a
lower mainland school
?
district.
Theme:
Open Education.
?
Permission
of the
Director
of Undergraduate Programs is
required.
422-4
Learning Disabilities
Correspondence
L.
Prock
424-4
Learning ?
Disabilities:
R 16:30-20:20
L.
Prock
Laboratory
Room MPX 8620
425-4
Counselling for the Classroom
T,
?
R 14:00-15:50
P.
Wilensky
Teacher
Room MPX 8651
433-4
Philosophical ?
Issues ?
in
T 16:30-20:20
A.
Kazepides
Curriculum
Room MPX 9511-12
441-4
Cultural ?
Differences and
T 16:30-20:20
K.
Toohey
Education
Room MPX 8651-52
465-4 Children's Literature
Correspondence
M.
Zola
468-4
Recent Advances in the Teaching
M 16:30-20:20
D.
Motzer
of English as a Second Language
Room MPX 7506
471-4
Curriculum Development:
?
Theory
T 16:30-20:20
M.
Gibbons
and Practice
Room MPX 7504
472-4
Designs for Learning:
?
Language
M 16:30-20:20
M.
Zol.a
Arts (Elementary)
Room MPX 7610
472-4
Designs -for-Learning:
?
La2ge_
9—i6:30-20:20-
M.
Gi.bo-ns
Arts (Secondary)
Room MPX-7ö0
473-4 Designs for Learning:
?
Reading
Correspondence
D.
Wright
474-4 Designs for Learning:
?
Social
W 16:30-20:20
K.
Egan
Sciences
Room MPX 7504
477-4
Designs for Learning:
?
Art
T 16:30-20:20
H. Pothorn
Room MPX 7500
479-4
Designs ?
for Learning: ?
P.E.
Prince George
G.
Kirchner
481-4
Designs for Learning:
?
French
W 16:30-20:20
R.
Tafler
Immersion
Room MPX 8651
486-4 Special ?
Topics: ?
Writing Process
T 16:30-20:20
C.
Mamchur
Room MPX 7600
Special ?
Topics: ?
Microcomputers
R 16:30-20:20
D.
Porter
in Education
Room MPX 8651
R 16:30-20:20
W.
Rothen
Room MPX 8651
.3

S ?
-3-
S
Kelowna
E.
Wong
487-4 Special ?
Topics: Theory and Practice
R 16:30-20:20
N. Robinson
.
of Educational Administration
Room MPX 9511
Special ?
Topics: ?
Strategies for
Windemere
Faculty
Teaching Thinking
Special ?
Topics: Theory and Practice
Ft. St.
?
John
P.
Coleman
of Educational Administration
488-4 Special ?
Topics: ?
Law in the
T 16:30-20:20
W. Cassidy
Classroom
Room MPX 8620
489-4 Experimental ?
Course: ?
Education
M 16:30-20:20
S.
Dawson
For the 21st Century
Room MPX 8620
Experimental ?
Course: ?
Logo
M 16:30-20:20
D.
Bell
Room MPX 8651
490-2
Directed Study:
?
Developmental
M 17:30-19:20
P.
Holborn
Supervision of Student Teachers.
Room MPX 7600
490-2)
491-2)
492-4)
Directed Study
493-4)
4944)

FACULTY OF EDUCATION ?
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
__PROGRAM E'JALUATION_______________
The content and d
y
namics of Education 406 are largely determined through the
development and implementation of individual, classroom-based projects. In order to
evaluate and improve the Ethic 406 program, we need your feedback. This questionnaire
addresses the com
p
onents of Educ 406 and your thoughts on the overall im
p
act of the
program. Your responses are for the purpose of program improvement and will not be
used for instructor evaluation.
Thanks for your cooperation.
Education 406 Section:
?
406 ff2 (011iver) ? (]
406 #3 (Hearn)
? (]
406 #4 (Zola)
? I]
406 #5 (Wassermann/Buchan) []
Name ?
Telephone:__________________
Address:
Postal Code:
Current Teaching Assignment/Grade Level:
Number of Years Teaching Experience:
Teacher Training Institution(s):
Post-Secondar y
Educational Background
?
Years: ?
Degree(s):_____________
When did you last register in a credit course?______________________________
.
fl
1"M

Back to top


IS-IR- 15113

. ?
.
INDIVIDUAL PROJECT (Project Component):
01 Did your project mainl
y
involve:
an Instructional focus [] a curriculum focus I] both 13 neither 11
02 Would you have carried out this project if you had not registered
In Educ 406?
?
Yes (3
?
No (] ?
Not Sure ()
If '
y
es', did Educ 406 make a difference to the wa
y
you implemented
the project? ?
Yes I]
?
No 13 ?
Not Sure C]
Comment:
03 Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements.
5--STRONGLY AGREE 4=AGREE 3=NEUTRAL 2--DISAGREE 1=STRONGLY DISAGREE
Your Educ 406 project had a significant Impact on:
a) your classroom teaching
?
5 ?
4 ?
3 ?
2
?
1
b) your school ?
5
?
4
?
3 ?
2 ?
1
Comment:
04 Please comment further on the project component of Educ 406
(e.g., how might the project component of Educ 406 be improved?):
GROUP SESSIONS
(Instruction and Seminar Component):
05 How many group sessions did you attend?
06 Did the group sessions mainl
y
focus on: discussion and problem-solving (]
theor y
and practice of implementation C]
?
both (] ?
neither (]
Comment:
07 Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements.
5--STRONGLY AGREE 4=AGREE 3=NEUTRAL 2--DISAGREE 1=STRONGLY DISAGREE
The group sessions were effective in helping you:
a)
Identify and define your project proposal
?
5 ?
4 ?
3 ?
2 ?
1
b)
Implement your project and solve problems
?
5
?
4
?
3
?
2
?
1
c)
monitor and evaluate your progress
?
5 ?
4 ?
3 ?
2 ?
1
Comment:
08 Please comment further on the instruction/seminar component of Educ 406
(e.g., how might this component of Educ 406 be improved?):

. ?
S
IN-SERVICE ASSOCIATE (Classroom Support Component)
09 ?
How many times did your In-Service Associate visit your classroom?_____
010 How many hours did the In-Service spend In your classroom?_____________
011 Was the number of visits and amount of time spent adequate given your
specific project?
?
Yes (]
?
No (]
Comment:
012 Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements.
5--STRONGLY AGREE 4=AGREE 3=NEUTRAL 2--DISAGREE 1=STRONGLY DISAGREE
Your In-Service Associate was effective in helping you to:
a) identif
y
and define your project
?
5 ?
4 ?
3 ?
2
?
1
b)
establish a baseline ?
5
?
4 ?
3 ?
2 ?
1
c)
implement your project
?
5
?
4
?
3 ?
2 ?
1
Comment:
013 Your In-Service Associate provided you with valuable feedback and helped
you to monitor your progress.
54
?
32 ?
1
Comment:
014 The role of In-Service Associate is necessary to the success of Educ 406.
5 ?
4
?
3
?
2 ?
1
Comment:
015 Please comment further on the classroom support component of Educ 406
(e.g., how might this component of Educ 406 be improved?):
C
S

S
EDUCATION 406
We
are interested in your feelings about the quality of Education 406; please comment
on the following aspects of your experience. If additional space is required, use the
reverse side of this page.
016 What do you expect universit
y
coursework to do for you?
017 How would you compare the classroom-based emphasis of Educ 406 to other
university credit courses you have taken?
018 What, for you, was the most valuable aspect of Educ 406?
S
?
019 What, for you, was the least valuable aspect of Educ 406?
020 Would you recommend Educ 406 to your colleagues? Yes C] No C]
How would you describe Educ 406 to a colleague interested in taking it?
021 Is 5 credits appropriate for Educ 406?
?
Yes 11 ?
No C] ?
Not sure C]
022 Has Educ 406 prompted an y
changes for you which you feel will continue
In the future?
?
Yes C]
?
No C]
?
Not sure C] ?
Please explain.
0

025
D ? 4
£...4k ? , ?
na.+ r4 PrItirfitn
4flA whirh
[IJ
. ?
.
EDUCATION 406
023 Please re-draw the sections of the circle to
indicate your view of the relative significance
of the components of Educ 406.
Comment:
Educ 406
cfzooA\
'N
'S..'
-5,.-
Stc . 'J) ?
/
024 Please rate Educ 406 as an overall professional development experience.
Excellent ?
Good ?
Average ?
Fair ?
Poor
5 ? 4 ?
3 ?
2
?
1
Fl ?
What form(s) of follow-up to Educ 406 would be valuable to you?
F2 ?
Would you be interested in participating in a classroom-based action and
research network in association with SFU? Yes []
?
No [1 ?
Not sure [1
THANKYOU
.

.
?
.
EDUCATION 406 - GROUP 2 ?
INSTRUCTOR: Steve
Ofl iver
This section applies only to Group 2 of Education 406. As with the previous
questions, responses are solel y
for the purpose of program improvement.
201 How valuable were the live Educ 361 sessions in helping you formulate and
implement your project?
202 How appropriate were the timing and sequencing of the topics in the
Educ 361 sessions?
203 How valuable were the Educ 406 seminar sessions in helping you
implement your project?
204 In your opinion, should there have been more or fewer of these
seminar sessions? ?
More (]
?
Fewer I) Same 13
205 Do you think that Educ 361 should be a:
a)
a prerequisite for Educ 406? 13
b)
a required concurrent course for Educ 406? 13
C)
neither ?
13
206 Please comment on the effectiveness of the Educ 361/406 teaching team.
.
0

S
5
EDUCATION 406 - GROUP 4 (SURREY)
?
INSTRUCTOR:
Mequido Zola
This section applies to Group 4 of Educ 406 (Surre
y
). As with the previous
questions, responses are solely for the purpose of program improvement.
401 How did you first hear about the Surrey section of Educ 406?
402 Did you attend the information meeting?
?
Yes () No (]
If "yes*, was It useful to you?
403 Was locating the group meetings in the school district, rather than on
the SFU campus, important to you ?
?
Yes (]
?
No [] Please explain.
404 How many sessions of Educ 472 did you attend?
S
405 Please comment on the process used to match
Up
Educ 406 participants
and In-Service Associates, and the final results.
406 As you know, Educ 406 Is a collaborative project between SFU and Surrey
School District. Is the School District involvement significant to you
In any wa y? ?
Yes (]
?
No ?
t] ?
Not sure E]
?
Please explain.
407 In what wa
y
s could the School District further support teachers
engaged in Educ 406 or similar coursework?
408 Further comments and suggestions.
0

FACULTY OF EDUCATION
?
SPRING 1985
NAME i
?
STUDENT NUMBER:
INSTRUCTOR:
?
SEMESTER:
PROJECT SUMMARY
Iinrlud
p rtinn1e.
descriotion and outccnes]
.
STUDENT SIGNATURE:_______________ INSTRUCTOR SIGNATURE:

Back to top