3d
    M
    PROPOSAL FOR PROCEDURE FOR SENATE TO FOLLOW
    .1p
    IN INTERDISCIPLINARY PROGRAMS
    The Faculty of Education requests that the Senate establish an
    Interdisciplinary Programs Committee to examine all interdisciplinary
    programs and to report to the next meeting of Senate on a recommendation
    of the Faculty of Education that the Interdisciplinary Program for the
    study of human movement lead to a B.Sc. Degree.
    Justification
    There are certain distinguishing characteristics and responsibil-
    ities that are implicit in any discipline.
    It must, for example, encourage
    and carry on extensive research to support and advance existing theories
    and to lead to new concepts and knowledge. Existing knowledge must be,
    organized and presented in an orderly and systematic fashion through course
    work or academic experiences. Each discipline too, must select interested
    and promising students and encourage them to follow specific programs
    leading to professional competence. Without these functions and respon-
    sibilities it is doubtful if any discipline would continue to advance.
    The personnel in the Physical Development Centre are faced with a
    situation which makes it impossible to carry out two of these functions.
    The reason why this situation exists are several, but should in no way be
    :construed as truly hampering the possibilities of future development.
    The philosophy of the Faculty of Education is one which identifies
    that the training of a teacher begins first with his mastery of the subject
    field or discipline he intends to teach. The method of promoting mastery
    of a discipline involves requiring the student to complete his undergraduate
    training in existing disciplines within the Faculties of Arts or Science.
    Following this academic preparation, the student then undergoes
    'a period of
    professional preparation. This appears to be a sound philosophy and one
    which is quite compatible with the thinking of the Physical Development Centre.
    The difficulty
    physical education has
    preparation. Only rec
    are two aspects to its
    sense of the term, and
    or technical sense.
    arises, however, when one realizes that the field of
    in the past primarily been one of professional
    ntly has the profession begun to realize that there
    totality; one, an academic discipline in the true
    two, the application of the discipline in a professional
    Because of this situation there does not exist within the Faculties
    of Arts, Science, or Education, a place for the study of the academic discipline
    of physical education. This means that unless a program for the advancement of
    the discipline is evolved within the structure of the Faculties of Arts, Science,
    or Education the discipline can not be studies and as a consequence, students
    could not be prepared professionally.
    The problem facing the Physical Development Centre therefore, was to
    define what in fact constitutes the academic discipline of physical education
    and then to determine how this field of study might best be incorporated within
    the existing structure of the University.
    ... 2

    S
    -2-
    SM!l!
    .
    ..
    S.
    The Physical Development Centre after extensive investigation and
    discussion agreed that the academic discipline of phyiical education may
    be Identified as being the study of the science of human movement, it was
    further agreed that the science of human movement Is founded upon a
    number of life and social sciences and that a study of human movement must
    first begin with a study of the basic concepts in these contributing
    sciences.
    The Physical Development Centre, through a committee established
    by the President, worked closely with the Dean of Science in the develop-
    ment of an interdisciplinary program for the study of human movement. This
    program was thoroughly discussed within the department of Biological
    Sciences and the Physical Development Centre and was then advanced to the
    Curriculum Committees of the Faculties of Science and Education. The program
    was accepted in. principle by both Committees and was passed back to the
    President's Committee for further modifications. The program, after refine-
    ment, was resubmitted to the Curriculum Committees; it was accepted in
    principle and in content and was advanced to the Faculty of Science for their
    approval and acceptance. The Faculty of Science by a vote of 20 to 15
    declined to accept the program on the grounds that it.did not appear to meet
    the requirements of a major degree in Science and suggested that the program
    'should be sponsored by the Faculty of Education or such other body of the
    University that the Senate-may recommend.
    The President's Committee in reviewing the possible actions which
    could be taken to advance this program following its defeat by the Faculty
    of Science, recommended to the President that the Senate be requested to
    establish a committee to examine all interdisciplinary progranis and in
    particular, the program for the study of human movement. It was further
    recommended that direct action be taken in the advancement of the program
    and that the Faculty of Education be requested to accept the courses proposed
    by the Physical Development Centre for the development of the program. The
    President concurred with these recommendations and suggested that the Faculty
    of Education be requested to advance these proposals to the Senate. It was
    further recommended by the President that the Faculty of Education should be
    requested to go on record as approving the offering of a B.Sc. degree for
    students following this program and as being willing to offer such a degree
    if the proposed Senate Interdisciplinary Committee is unable to Come up with
    a more satisfactory solution.
    It has further been suggested that the terms of reference for this
    committee could include the identification of the various areas of inter-
    disciplinary activity that Simon Fraser University could teach. The committee
    could also make recommendations on the administrative structure for the over-
    seeing of interdisciplinary programs, on the acceptability of proposed inter-
    disciplinary programs and on the degrees to be offered for each interdisciplinary
    program•
    n

    Back to top