1. outside work):

am
0/^Iu
I
— e
l^i 4-
-t
__
TO:
SENATE
PAPER 31
FROM:
AP.TS PACULTY
July 22, 1966
SUBJECT:
CREDIT
ALLOTMENT FOR LANGUAGE COURSES 100 & 101
File: 7-A--35
The Arts Faculty recommends to Senate chat the language courses
100 and 101 be changed from a credit allotment of 3 to 5. The Faculty
further recommends that this change be retroactive to the Fall Semester
1965.
The statement (prepared by a special committee of the Faculty)
approved by the Arcs Faculty is as follows:
"We believe that the total time commitment that a course de-
mands fron
it
z
.
tudn: must be taken into consideration in
determinin the
crcdic hours allotted to that course.
In vied oi
hac appcars to be
a
considerable total time
commitment for foreign
language courses 100 and 101, and in
view of the fact that the Department of Modern Languages
considers it essential that these courses., by the nature of
their subject matter, should be intensive in treatment, this
Committee accepts on
the recommendation of the DML an increase
to five
hours in the credit allotment for these courses.
"This recommendation is not
to
be taken as a precedent either
for other departments to intensify their courses and demand
more credit hours or for changing the idea of a liberal arts
education. (With regards to the latter it should be noted
that this program would require 16 semester hours credit in
the first two years.)"
The arguments for this recommendation are attached.
D. P. Robertson
Secretary
Arts Faculty
•;

c h&
Arguments for an increase in credit hours
for
language courses_00 and 101
S
1. FL 100 and 101 represent an anomaly in the class-credit
ouio
The number of credit hours given to foreign language courses 100
and 101 which have 8 sessions per week)
p:cesentc
an anomaly in
terms of the class-credit hour ratio use
at.
SFU
for
other courses
—no other courses at SF11 having more than 5 meetings per week
give only 3 hours' credit and the only other coursee having 8
meetings,
General Chemistry I
and II (with their labs, usually
taken
concurrently) , give a total
of 5 credits (see
the SFU
Catalogue).
2 The total_time commitment _for FL 100
and 101 is considerthly
I
I1Fn £FEherATE
rt
-5
sc
-
scsTncIicung
The small
number
of credit hours given to L 100 and 101 cannot
be justified by claiming that
these
courses requao leis outs.id-
of-.class work than other courses; since they demand considerable
outside memorization and grammatical drill study for classroom
performances [see, for example, the course rogra.mte for
Spanish 100] moreover, several
hundred tu&nts in FL 100 and
101 claimed, through a poll conducted by
ir0
Mynot last semester,
that these courses require an outside-of-class Lime comritment
from equal to double that demanded
by other courFJeJ (see SLudent-.
Brief of February
28 resented to the Faculty on march 3.0)
now let's look at three different ways of comparing total time ortiitmc
a) lf we accept the figures in the student pc.U., the total time corcatiitiiie;L
for, a student in, for example, Spanish 100 or
German
101 would cornjarc
as follows with the total time
commitment in other courses:
FL 100 or 101 £ C + 12
20
Other courses a 3
+
6
9
0

5
b)
If we use the standard formula of two hours of outside-of-class
study per hour of class, the total time coinitment figures would
be as £o1iowi 'notice that
3 hours in
FL 100 and 101 don't require
outside work):
FL
100 or
101: 8 + 5x2)
18
Other courses: 3
+
(3x2)
9
c)
If
we have doubts about the reliability of the student poll and
assume instead that students
in
FL
100
or 101 spend neither more
nor less time in outside-of-class study than in other courses, the
figures would be
as follows:
Fl 100 or
101: 8
-F
6
14
Other courses: 3 +
6
9
3. Students are
unha
wh the
resent credit a1iotmnt.
Last fall about 750 students in FL 100 or 101 signed a petition
asking that credit hours for these courses be increed to
five, while stating that their .discontent was not with the
courses. themselves but with their low credits. The students'
dissatisfaction with the low and misleading) credit allotment
W
for FL 100 and 101 can be
seen also in
the considerbie attrition
in some of these courses. The students discontent has continacd
to
be expressed through
inquiries and complain
ts
to
the obudrtan
and to members of
the D
t
;
stronge
h
r expressions
of student
dissatisfaction can be expected
in
the future i.nothing is clone.
4. The present credit allotment..forFL_3.00 d 101
is out bi-
neI
tb
prat'ces tt1
n
Tua
q
e_tei
q
A
rt
,.....
sT6
--
-
a) Regardless of the method of language teaching
.
used: mOst
North American universiti offer more intensive FL courses:
usually
carrying more crelit hours than later courses,
during
the first year of FL study (see current university cata1ogue
b) At other universities where as in sru, an intensive audiolthgutL
• itothod is used, first-year FL courses receive 5 o:
6 c:cedit hottz;
while
other
FL courses and courses in other depa;:trnts get 3
(sorn even Z) credit hours
(see catalogues oi Cornell U 6 credit,
hours), San rrencisco S.C..
U.
of Oklahoma .). U. of
Colorado (5) .;mericn U. 6) .
Louisiana S.U.
15fl., tAwong
othtw things this means that a student transering to or frorct
SF0 from or to such uriversities would lose several credit
hours
in
the process.)
a r eeeeeee

j.
-3--
In view
of
those reacns and in view of the tact
that the Dapnrtinont of modexn Languages considers that
these cournes, by the nature of their subject matter, should
r
the
ema
F
i
a
n
c
i
ul
nt
t
e
y
ns
of
ive
Ar
in
ts
t
t
r
o
ea
v
t
ot
m
e
ent
an
, t
i
he
ncr
unde
ease
rs
to
igne
f iv
d
e
w
l'i
i
our
f3h
t
s
o
i
ur
n
ge
the
credit allotment
,
for these courses.
In
urging such a vote,
WO
with also to draw the attention of the'acu1ty to the
following
'I
a)
Since language courses are optional at SVU,
and
or
sinc
101
e m
c
a
oul
ny
d
s
be
tude
pl
nt
ace
tha
d i
t
n
ha
the
v e
pr
s
opos
o far
ed
be
ne
en
w
a
200
ssigne
cour
d .
t
s
o
e
100
, this
o
i
c
0e
ha
0t
nge
he
9
j
S
us
F
in
U
t
c
1/
S
r
t
e
12
u
didet
of
ntal
.t
slot,
he
durm
t
e
ot
intng
a
s
l
one
w
st
oul
ude
of
d
nt
t
a
he
f
t
f
i
e
i
m
r
ct
f
e
our
.
only
ye
a
a
bout
rs at
one
SFU
t
,
hrid
b)
This change in credit allotments has a iz only
pur
co - runi
pos
tm
e
e
nt
the
-c
C
re
O
di
rZC
t
C
hour
UC'n
of
rati
a
o
n
a
x!
nd
s
s
t
houl
ing
a
d
n'
not
(-.m a
be
ly
5.1,1
Lks
the
n a
ti
r
nt
, a
s
precedent for other departments to intensify their courses
and dmnd more credits without: justifying
the
need for an
S
early
iraensjve treatment of the subject; matter it should
not be taken either as a precedent for changing the idea of a
liberal arts education
C)
As
a resut of this change the DI, will not: be
attracting
Students
away
from courses in ct:her deparLen.
for its roquiretients
of 16 hours 5+5+3--3) duincj tho
first two years differs only slightly i
j quan,-ity, and
primarily in
d
i
s
tribution, from the requirements of 15 hou.rj
(3x5) made by other
departments.
H00
rIZfl1Tfl:r1y,
J)M
J
-
G.P.
IcalU
day
DLi.:
-.
Ruzsm
B. D.
Kareen,.
DL.'L
-.
S t
Newton,
Mitt
- French
and Acting HecI
S

Back to top