M
    119
    /&&
    -
    TO:
    SENATE
    PAPER 3F
    FROM:
    SENATE COMMITTEE ON UNDERGRADUATE ADMISSIONS
    July 22, 1966
    SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION OF ADMISSIONS POLICY
    File: 7-A-I
    The Committee is empowered by Senate, "to determine the credit to
    be given to accepted applicants, for previous academic work." The Committee
    has under consideration a request from an:applicant, supported by a Depart-
    ment Head at Simon Fraser, for credit based on maturity, experience, publi-
    cations, etc. The individual in question is undoubtedly capable and
    meritorious, but has not taken any previous academic work for which credit
    can be given.
    The Committee is quite clear that it can admit mature students to
    the University who may have incomplete high school, or in extreme cases, no
    high school, but this is the first time the question of advance credit has
    been raised in this connection.
    There are a number of points that should be raised for the
    .
    attention of Senate. One is that the University does not extend credit (as
    different from standing) to "native speakers" who enrol in language courses.
    That is, a native Russian may not receive credit for the elementary Russian
    courses even though it is obvious he has far more than a mastery of the
    language at that level. He would not be required to take the elementary
    courses: he would be allowed to take senior courses, but he must still take
    enough courses in total to meet the credit requirements for the given
    standing in the elementary accounting course, but he would not be given
    credit for it.
    The Committee discussed a number of other anomolies of this sort
    which are traditional with Universities, such as the creative writer, the
    amateur historian, biologist, etc. These people are not eligible for earned
    degrees; if they are outstanding they often receive an honorary degree.
    If the Senate decides to recognize maturity and performance out-
    side the area of academic credit courses, the Committee would appreciate
    very detailed advice as to how this recognition is to be decided and who
    would do the deciding.
    D. P. Robertson
    Chairman
    .
    Senate Committee on
    Undergraduate Admissions
    SF
    MF

    Back to top