I
    II'
    To: Senate
    From: Registrar
    Subject: PROPOSED GRADING SYSTEM
    April 2.5, 1966
    AT SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
    To Proposed Grading System papers are attached:
    1)
    Paper C) - I was approved by the Faculties of Science and
    Education
    2) Paper C)
    2 was presented by the Faculty of Arts as an
    amendment to paper C) - 1.
    The two papers are now presented for the consideration of Senate.
    D. P. Robertson
    I-L-1
    0

    .M
    •A1/
    President's Committee on
    Examination
    • '
    Grading and Scholastic Standings.
    '
    PROPOSED GRADING SYSTEM AT SF11 '
    '
    'March 28, 1966.
    1•
    A. Gradig Scale -
    Letter Grade
    Pts. for Internal Use
    Pts. for 'External Use
    A
    A+,
    ,
    '•
    4.0
    45
    4.0
    4.0
    B.:
    B+
    S
    3.5
    .
    ,
    3.0
    , 30''
    .....'3.0
    2.5
    30
    C
    '
    2.0
    C-
    2.0
    -
    ,
    '
    ,.
    1.5
    2.0
    D
    '••
    .
    1.0'
    '
    1.0
    F
    Def.
    .
    '
    .
    0
    0•
    •'
    0
    N
    0
    '
    **
    .'
    0
    0.
    Instructors would submit letter grades from Column 1. The Registrar would convert
    .
    1:0
    Columns 2 and 3. Columns 1 and 3 would appear on the student's statement of
    marks. Column 2 would be a "private" calculation to provide to the SFU Scholarship
    four
    and Awards
    categories
    Committee
    used in
    each
    Column
    semester
    3.
    a list which makes finer
    distinctIons
    than the
    _Questions:
    . , (a) Why not just use Column 2? The Committee was of the opinion that the use of
    Column 2 rrjflSjdCt; and Column 3 "Outside" satisfied both sides on the contro-
    versy
    to the
    over
    stude
    the
    nt
    degree
    if all faculty
    of exactitude
    strive
    possible
    to use the
    in
    full
    marking.
    range
    A
    of
    nd
    grades
    it does
    available
    no damage
    knowing that the fine structure of grade points is only for
    internal
    purposes.
    * The letter grade, Def., will be given when a physician's certificate or other
    document substantiating a' request' for a deferment on medical or compassionate
    grounds is received by the Registrar within four days of the' date on which the
    examination was to have been written and when such deferment'is agreed to by
    -
    the instructor involved. The Def. grade may be removed when a new grade is
    established; the
    method
    of establishing the new grade is a matter between the
    instructor and the Registrar. .
    • .
    ** The letter grade N is given when a student registered for a course and did not
    write the examination and did not withdraw before the set date.' An
    N
    is con-
    .
    sidered an F for purposes of scholastic
    standing.
    -2-

    5M c//
    ,.
    ct
    -2-
    While some fine structure is essential for the purposes of the Scholar-
    ship and Awards Committee the four point scale is certainly the most
    commonly used in North America and there appears to be some virtue in
    helping our students to appear reasonably "normal" on their transcripts.
    (b) Will it not be
    t
    p
    uzzwith
    lip-
    -
    the
    Q;
    —to
    same
    students
    grade poLnts
    as well
    as a
    as others if a
    M
    To some degree, it may be puzzling, but no more so than that the very
    same thing occurs under
    every
    conceivable system of grading except per-
    centage points or some similar ultra-fine structure. All this proposal
    With
    does
    5(A+)
    is draw
    which
    attent
    would
    ion
    to
    not
    this
    be possible
    p
    ossibility
    with
    and
    mere
    give
    A's.
    a lift
    In addition,
    to the
    student
    the
    man
    list.
    with
    5
    (A+) does appear ahead of the man with
    5(A)
    on the Scholarship
    B. A grade point avera
    L
    e is computed by the Registrar by dividing the total
    number of grade points by the total number of semester hours.
    Example:
    • Letter Grade
    Numerical
    Semester
    Grade Point
    -
    Value
    Hours
    Course 1
    A
    4
    3
    12
    Course 2
    A+
    4
    3
    12
    Course 3
    B-
    3
    3
    9
    Course 4
    C
    2
    3
    6
    Course
    5
    F
    0
    4
    0
    16
    39
    Grade Point Average 39
    2.44
    16
    •C.
    Standings for the Semester
    The Committee recommends that no rigid determination be made of the grade
    average required for First Class
    point
    , Second Class and Pass
    Standing
    at this time.
    The Committee recommends that for the time being the
    S
    cholarship and Awards
    Committee determine for its own purposes and for the purposes of government
    awards what the cut-off points are for each semester.
    D. Credit for the Semester
    The
    student
    Committee
    r
    egardless
    recommends
    of the
    that
    standi
    any
    ng
    semester
    in the course,
    hours credit
    or number
    gained
    of
    be granted to the
    the grade point average.
    courses passed, or
    • E. Standings re
    q
    uired for Continuance at the University
    The
    2.0
    Committee
    be placed
    or
    ecommends that students
    r
    eceiving a grade point average lass than
    n"probation" and that further action to be taken in such cases be
    determined by the Senate Committee on Admissions and
    Standings.

    3.-
    F. Standings Recuired for Graduation
    The Committee recommends that the minimum
    r
    equirement for graduation be a
    grade point average of 2.0 computed on the courses used for credit towards
    the degree, and in addition there may be further requirements established
    by departments for their major and honors program.
    C. The Committee was asked by the Committee of Heads to make a
    recommendation
    regarding the re-writing of papers. The Committee recommends that, except
    in the case of a Def. grade, a student not be allowed to re-write (or write,
    in the case of receiving an N grade) a paper unless he re-registers for the
    course and participates in the course as required by the instructor.
    Respectfully submitted,
    C. L. Bursjll-Hall (Sub. B.E. Newton)
    R. Coombes - Secretary
    -
    .
    .
    .
    .
    P. Copes
    R.J.C. Harper
    K. E. Rieckhoff
    D. P. Robertson*- Chairman
    S. Stratton
    D. G. Tuck
    :

    (
    STo: Senate
    Paper No. 3C) - 2
    411
    L
    44
    cSD1
    A/t/
    PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE GRADING SYSTEM PROPOSED BY THE PRESIDENT'S CO?IITTEE
    ON EXAMINATION GRADING AND SCHOLASTIC STANDING.
    Amendment 1 : It is proposed that Columns 1 and 2 of the Committee's proposal be
    changed to read as follows
    Letter Grade
    Pts. for Internal Use
    4.33 (or 4.3)
    A
    4.0
    A-
    3.66 (or 3.7)
    3.33
    (or 3.3)
    B
    3.0
    B-
    2.66
    (or 2.7)
    C+
    2.33
    (or 2.3)
    C
    2.0
    C-
    1.66
    (or 1.7)
    1.33
    (or 1.3)
    D-
    0:66
    (or 0.7)
    Def*
    0
    0
    (Col. 3: same)
    *
    The letter grade, Def., will be given when a physician's certificate or other
    document substantiating a request for a deferment on medical or compassionate
    grounds is received by the Instructor within four days of the date on which
    the examination was to have been written. The Def. grade may be removed when
    t
    new grade is established; the method of establishing the new grade is a
    matter between the instructor and the Registrar.
    ** The letter grade N is given when a student registered for a course and did not
    write the examination and did not withdraw before the set date. An N is con.-
    sidered an F for purposes of scholastic standing.
    Amendment 2:
    Add the letter grade I (Incomplete) to Column 1, making it a grade
    to be given at the discretion of the teacher and to be converted
    automatically into an F (by the Registrar) after an allotted period
    of time.
    (Passed by the Faculty of Arts at its meeting
    of April 21, 1966)
    April 25, 1966

    Back to top