0
DRAFT UNTIL APPROVED BY SENATE
Minutes of a Meeting of the Senate of Simon Fraser University held on ?
Monday, July 9, 2007 at 7:00 pm in Room 3210 WMC
Open Session
S
is
Present:
Stevenson, Michael, President and Chair of Senate
Abdulwahab, Kamal
Black, Sam
Brebner, Sarah
Copeland, Lynn
Dickinson, Peter
Driver, Jon
Ester, Martin
Fizzell, Maureen
Fox, Sasha
Francis, June
Gencay, Raino
Gordon, Robert
Hannah, David
Harder, Derrick
Harding, Kevin
Haunerland, Norbert
Hayes, Michael
Hemingway, Alex
Javed, Waseem
Jones, John (representing B. Lewis)
Laba, Martin
LaBrie, John
Lein, Adam
Letourneau, Michael
Liljedahl, Peter
MacLean, David
Mathewes, Rolf (representing M. Plischke)
Percival, Cohn
Peters, Joseph
Pierce, John
Pinto, Mario
Thompson, Steve
Tiffany, Evan
Tse, Karen
Vaid, Bhuvinder
Van Baarsen, Amanda
Wakkary, Ron
Warner, D'Arcy
Waterhouse, John
Kiai, Mehran, Acting Registrar/Senior Director, Student
Enrolment
Watt, Alison, Director, University Secretariat
Grant, Bobbie, Recording Secretary
Absent:
Brennand, Tracy
Corbett, Kitty
Dagenais, Diane
Easton, Stephen
Krane, Bill
Malik, Hamza
McArthur, James
Percival, Paul
Popadiuk, Natalee
Russell, Robert
Shaker, Paul
Shermer, Thomas
Smart, Carolyne
Smith, Don
Weeks, Daniel
Williams, Peter
Williams, Tony
In attendance:
Anderson, Gail
Barton, Andrew
Burley, David
Dench, Sarah
Fairey, Elaine
Khan Hemani, Rummana
Johnston, Nancy
Moore, Donna
S.M. 9 July 2007
Page 2
Approval of the Agenda
The Agenda was approved as distributed.
2.
Approval of the Minutes of the O
pen
Session of June 11, 2007
The Minutes were approved as distributed.
3.
Business Arising from the Minutes
There was no business arising from the Minutes.
4.
Report of the Chair
On behalf of Senate and the University, the Chair acknowledged the service and
expressed appreciation to the following Deans whose terms of office will be ending on
August 31, 2007: David MacLean, Faculty of Health Sciences, and John Pierce, Faculty
of Arts and Social Sciences. The following Senators will also be leaving Senate at the end
of August and, on behalf of Senate, the Chair expressed thanks to Norbert Haunerland
who will commence appointment as Associate Vice-President Research, effective
September 1, 2007; and Martin Ester who will commence a Study Leave.
5.
Question Period
There were no questions.
6.
Reports of Committees
A) ?
Senate Committee on University Priorities ?
5
i)
Paper S.07-84 - Centre for Forensic Research
Moved by J. Waterhouse, seconded by A. van Baarsen
"that Senate approve and recommend to the Board of Governors the
creation of the Centre for Forensic Research as a Schedule A Centre
within the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences"
Brief discussion took place with respect to the criteria for a Schedule A Centre versus a
Schedule B Centre.
The question was called, and a vote taken.
? MOTION CARRIED
ii)
Paper
S.07-85 -
Report on Under
g
raduate Curriculum Im
plementation (For
Information)
S. Dench, Director, University Curriculum and Institutional Liaison, was in attendance to
respond to questions.
A question was raised as to why there were no WQB courses in the Faculty of Health
Sciences. Senate was advised that since the curriculum and course development were still
S
S.M. 9 July 2007
Page 3
S
in progress, it was decided to wait until all faculty hires were completed and the
curriculum was in place before any courses were certified. Expectations are that
certification will be resolved within the next few months.
Reference was made to a statement in the third paragraph on the last page of the report
which suggested that FAL and FAN courses should provide integral credits rather than
additive credits and therefore count towards a student's degree. An opinion was
expressed that since the courses exist to provide remedial material for students not
adequately prepared from high school, they should not count towards a university degree.
It was pointed out that the courses are counted in a student's CGPA and since there were
already a number of courses in Physics, Math and Chemistry which provide upgrading
for students coming from high school and count toward the degree requirements, it was
felt that this suggestion needed to be monitored and evaluated.
On behalf of Senate, the Chair extended thanks and appreciation to Sarah Dench for her
pivotal role with respect to curriculum development.
B)Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies
i) ?
Paper S.07-86 - Student Success Pro
g
ram -Special Exemptions from
Undergraduate Academic Standin
g
and Continuance Policy
S ?
Moved by J. Waterhouse, seconded by K. Harding
"that Senate approve that exemptions be made to existing Standing and
Continuance policies as follows:
1.
At the end of the first enrolled semester subsequent to being placed on
Academic Probation, International and Faculty of Applied Sciences students with
both a SGPA and CGPA below 2.00, rather than being Required to Withdraw
(RTW), will be invited to enroll in the "Student Success" program. If they choose
this option, then their academic standing will be changed to Continuing Academic
Probation (CAP). Students who do not take up the program will remain RTW, and
will be required to meet the normal readmission requirements.
2.
At the end of Semester One of the "Student Success" program, if both the
SGPA and CGPA are below 2.00, a student will only be RTW if they have not
competed the prescribed non-credit modules. This is the only exception to the
current evaluation policy for students enrolled in the program. At the end of
Semester Two, the current evaluation policy will apply to all students.
3.
A student enrolled in the "Student Success" program will not be permitted to
exceed 9 credit hours of regular course enrollment, with the exception of students
whose CGPA >2.00 at the end of Semester One. These students will be in Good
Academic Standing.
And that these exemptions be reviewed by the end of the Spring 2008 semester"
S
S.M. 9 July 2007
Page 4
R. Khan Hemani, Director, Academic Advising and Student Success, Nancy Johnston,
Senior Director, Student Learning and Retention, and Elaine Fairey, Director, Student
Learning Commons, were in attendance to respond to questions.
A Senator suggested that failure in a student's initial W or Q course was a good indicator
of whether remedial help was needed and asked why these students were not being
targeted. A suggestion was also made that students should be able to enter this program
before they become RTW. It was pointed out that there are a variety of potential
indicators that could have been used but the RTW factor had been chosen for this pilot
program. At the end of the pilot a full evaluation will be done and recommendations will
come forward on future directions.
A question was raised about the choice of the two groups included in the study, RTW
students in the Faculty of Applied Sciences and RTW International students, and whether
the choice of these two groups would skew the results. R. Khan Hemani indicated that
these two groups were chosen because these are fairly diverse groups, and because they
contain a large number of high school students.
Discussion focused on data from SFU and other universities with respect to academic
probation. Some data implied that a considerable number of high school students appear
to go on academic probation within two years of admission, and an opinion was
expressed that that seemed to suggest that high schools were not adequately preparing
students academically for university. An inquiry was made as to whether any outreach
strategies were taking place in this regard. Senate was advised that both academic and
non-academic factors affect the performance of high school students and discussions
were taking place with colleagues and high school councilors about these issues.
It was noted that the data with respect to the percentage of students on academic
probation for the different adthission categories demonstrates that admission averages
have an impact on academic performance, and an opinion was expressed that the high
percentage of students on academic probation was a consequence of recently decreased
admission requirements and served as a signal that admission requirements should not be
arbitrarily lowered. Senate was advised that the grade point average for BC 12
admissions for SFU as a whole has been steadily increasing since 2000, but lower
minimum admission averages had been implemented in some Faculties. However, the
lowering of the minimum admission gpas has had no observable impact on student
retention or graduation rates.
In response to a question as to whether or not the language barrier was a source of
difficulty for international students, Senate was advised that transition issues were greater
than this and that language was an issue for both international and domestic students.
Senate was advised that ESL supervisors were being hired for the Learning Commons
and should be available to assist students by the Fall semester.
Reference was made to past discussions at Senate in which students advocated for
increased services of this kind, and D. Harder, on behalf of the students, expressed
S.M. 9 July 2007
Page
5
S
?
appreciation for this initiative and extended congratulations to the staff in Student
Services who have worked to bring this forward.
The question was called, and a vote taken.. ? MOTION CARRIED
The Chair acknowledged the energy and professionalism of staff in Student Services who
are dealing with very serious issues of enrolment management and thanked those in
attendance with respect to this matter.
ii)
Paper S.07-87- Admission Re
q
uirements - Applicants from other Canadian
Provinces
Moved by J. Waterhouse, seconded by C. Percival
"that Senate approve that Canadian High School Admission Requirements
mirror the requirements from leading universities in each province, and
use five or six courses for admission"
D. Moore, Associate Registrar, Admissions was in attendance to respond to questions.
If requirements were changed and made easier for students in a particular province, a
concern was expressed that this would then make it easier for students from that province
S ?
to gain admission to SFU. Senate was advised that since admission requirements would
be based on a 'leading university', standards would be assured.
The question was called, and a vote taken. ?
MOTION CARRIED
iii)
Pa p
er S.07-88 - Curriculum Revision - Faculty of Applied Sciences (For
Information)
Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting
under delegated authority, approved minor changes to an existing course in the School of
Interactive Arts and Technology.
iv)
Paper S.07-89 - Curriculum Revisions - Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (For
Information)
Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting
under delegated authority, approved the deletion of numerous courses not offered for at
least six semesters.
v)
Paper S.07-90 - Curriculum Revisions - Facult
y of Business Administration (For
Information)
Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting
under delegated authority, approved minor revisions to lower division requirements and
existing courses in Business Administration.
0
S.M. 9 July 2007
Page 6
vi)
Paper S.07-91 - Curriculum Revisions - Facult
y
of Health Sciences (For
Information)
Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting
under delegated authority, approved minor revisions to lower division requirements and
existing courses in Health Sciences.
vii)
Paper S.07-92 - Curriculum Revisions - Facult
y
of Science (For Information)
Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting
under delegated authority, approved minor revisions to programs and existing courses in
Chemistry, Earth Sciences, and Biological Sciences. SCUS also approved, under
delegated authority, changes to breadth requirements for the Faculty of Science and the
Environmental Science Program.
C) ?
Senate Graduate Studies Committee
i)
Paper S.07-93 - Curriculum Revision - Earth Sciences PhD Program (For
Information)
Senate received information that the Senate Graduate Studies Committee, acting under
delegated authority, approved changes in calendar language to clarify the PhD entry
requirements and program transfer from the MSc to the PhD program.
ii)
Paper S.07-94 - New courses - De
partment
of Mathematics (For Information)
Senate received information that the Senate Graduate Studies Committee, acting under
delegated authority, approved five new graduate courses in Mathematics.
?
is
iii)
Paper
S.07-95 -
Cohort Special Arrangements Master of Arts Program in
International Studies (For Information)
Senate received information that the Senate Graduate Studies Committee, acting under
delegated authority and in accordance with the rules approved by Senate for Special
Arrangement Programs, approved a Cohort Special Arrangements Master of Arts
Program in International Studies as a pilot program to begin in Fall 2007 for a maximum
of three years. Eleven new graduate courses associated with the program were also
approved by SGSC under delegated authority.
iv)
Paper S.07-96 - Revised Graduate Student Appeals Procedures -Graduate
General Regulation 1.8.2 - Unsatisfactor
y
Progress (For Information)
Senate received information that the Senate Graduate Studies Committee, acting under
delegated authority, approved a revised procedures for appealing decisions under
Graduate General Regulation 1.8.2 - Unsatisfactory Progress. The revised procedures
include new guidelines concerning documentation for appeals, and are effective
immediately.
v)
Paper S.07-97 - New Stream in the PhD Program, Faculty of Education (For
Information)
Senate received information that the Senate Graduate Studies Committee, acting under
delegated authority, approved a new stream - Languages, Cultures, and Literacies - in
S.M. 9 July 2007
Page 7
. ?
the PhD Program in the Faculty of Education. Six new graduate courses associated with?
the new stream were also approved by SGSC under delegated authority.
D)
Senate Committee on A
g
enda and Rules
i) ?
Paper S.07-98 - Annual Re
p
ort (For Information
The Annual Report of the Senate Committee on Agenda and Rules, covering the period 1
June 2006 to 31 May 2007, was received by Senate for information.
E)
Senate Nominatin
g
Committee
i) ?
Paper S.07-99 - Elections
Senate was advised that no further nominations had been received. Dan Weeks was
therefore elected by acclamation to the Senate Committee on Agenda and Rules, and the
vacancies on the Senate Committee on Continuing Studies and the Senate Committee on
University Teaching and Learning would be carried forward to the next meeting of
Senate. The results of balloting for the International Student Exchange Committee
resulted in the election of Michael Favere-Marchesi for term of office to May 31, 2009.
7.
?
Other Business
i) ?
Paper S.07-100 - Boycott Motion
S
Moved by S. Black, seconded by M. Hayes
"that Senate authorize the Chair of Senate to express disapproval on behalf
of Senate of the contemplated boycott of Israeli academic institutions by
the University and College Union of the UK.
Senate recommends that the Chair of Senate's statement appear on the
University's web site in a prominent and accessible position"
The Chair explained that generally it was not SCAR's intention to bring forward political
motions to Senate but SCAR felt that since this motion focuses on the question of
academic freedom, it was appropriate for presentation to Senate.
A lengthy discussion took place on these points.
A question was raised about whether the Faculty Association ought to take a
position on this matter, rather than Senate, or whether SFUFA's views could have been
made known prior to the debate. The Chair noted that he had not received any indication
from the President of SFUFA or its Executive that it opposed Senate dealing with this.
Several matters were raised about the intention of the wording, what was meant
by "authorize", what was being authorized, how such a statement would be publicized,
etc. Some Senators felt it was unusual for Senate to be asked to support a statement
without knowing exactly how it would be expressed. It was stated that the intention of
S.M. 9 July 2007
Page 8
the motion was to provide the President with a mandate from Senate, but that it was
deliberately drafted to allow the President to exercise his judgment and discretion.
In the debate, there appeared to be no disagreement that this was primarily a
matter of academic freedom, but there were concerns that the wording created difficulties
in interpretation. Senators debated whether this was a principled stand against academic
boycotts and whether or not they were justified in all cases. And if it was a principled
stand, why was there a need for reference to the UK union's proposed boycott about
which no detailed information was available.
Some Senators felt that they had been given insufficient time to consider the
motion and to become more informed about the issues. One Senator noted that the
boycott was being considered by the University and College Union of the UK, and
wondered whether Senate action should await the outcome of the UCU deliberations.
Senators also discussed the various potential interpretations of Senate approving or
defeating the motion.
In an effort to clarify the intention of the motion, an amendment was moved by E.
Tiffany, seconded by S. Black
"that the first sentence of the motion be amended as follows:
On the grounds
that it violates academic freedom,
Senate authorizes the Chair of Senate to
express disapproval on behalf of Senate of the contemplated boycott of Israeli
academic institutions by the University and College Union of the UK"
In discussion on the amendment, it was suggested that specific reference to
Israeli/Palestinian circumstances might also need to be deleted since the amendment
refers to an absolute principle.
The question was called on the amendment, and a vote taken.
AMENDMENT FAILED
Because a variety of procedural questions had been raised, the Chair provided a detailed
analysis of procedural options available to Senate.
Moved by A. Hemingway, seconded by W. Javed
"that the motion be tabled to the next meeting of Senate"
The question was called, and a vote taken. ?
MAIN MOTION TABLED
Senator Black indicated that he was not prepared to bring the motion back to the next
meeting. It was noted that SCAR would determine further action on the motion.
Secretary's note: President Stevenson issued a statement on the proposed boycott
following the Senate meeting. (attached).
9
S.M. 9 July 2007
Page 9
S
8. ?
Information
The date of the next regularly scheduled meeting of Senate is Monday, September 17,
2007. There is no meeting scheduled in August.
Open Session adjourned at 8:15 pm and Senate moved directly into Closed Session.
Alison Watt, Director, University Secretariat
C
Statement on Proposed Boycott of Israeli Universities
?
Page
/0
SFU.CA
?
Burnaby
I
Surrey
I
Vancouver
?
SFU Online
I.
A-Z Links
OR
Home
News & Information
Contact Us
Values & Commitments
Governance
Home > president
Chancellor
STATEMENT ON PROPOSED BOYCOTT OF ISRAELI UNIVERSITIES
Former Presidents &
In response to the call of the University and College Union of the UK for consideration of a boycott of
Chancellors
Israeli universities, I wish to state my clear disapproval of such a move. An academic boycott conflicts
Administration
with the free exchange of ideas and research that is central to the mission of universities, and violates the
principle of academic freedom. Such action might be justifiable in response to a state's action which
stripped its universities of academic freedom, and to complicity in such action on the part of its university
administrations and faculty. Clearly, complexities and ambiguities surround empirical arguments of this
kind, as recent discussion in the Senate of Simon Fraser University has indicated. However, whatever
one's position on other issues in that county or region, I do not believe that such criticisms can be made of
the state of Israel, and Israeli universities share our commitment to the fundémental value of academic
freedom. I call for all who subscribe to this value to oppose the proposed boycott of Israeli universiti
Michael Stevenson,
President & Vice-Chancellor, July 9th, 2007
8888 University Drive, Burnaby, B.C. Canada V5A 1 S6 I Terms / Privacy
I
contact Us
I
SiteMap
I Road Conditions I © Simon Fras
.
hffr
//ururul z
fii
r' Ir
rPQ/flrPc1tl ?
/rr ?
czpd hivrtt html
?
R/27/2007