DRAFT UNTIL APPROVED BY SENATE
    Minutes of a meeting of the Senate of Simon Fraser University held on
    ?
    Monday, March
    5,
    2007 at 7:00 pm in Room 3210 WMC
    .
    Present:
    Stevenson, Michael, President and Chair
    Black Sam
    Breden, Felix
    Brennand, Tracy
    Copeland, Lynn
    Corbett, Kitty
    Dagenais, Diane
    Deigrande, John
    Dickinson, Peter
    Driver, Jon
    Easton, Stephen
    Ester, Martin
    Fizzell, Maureen
    Fox, Graham
    Francis, June
    Gordon, Irene
    Gordon, Robert
    Gregory, Titus
    Harder, Derrick
    Haunerland, Norbert
    Hayes, Michael
    Honda, Barry
    Javed, Waseem
    Joes, Michel
    Krane, Bill
    LaBrie, John
    Lewis, Brian
    Lewis, Glyn
    Mathewes, Rolf (representing M. Plischke)
    Percival, Cohn
    Percival, Paul
    Peters, Joseph
    Pierce, John
    Russell, Robert
    Schellenberg, Betty
    Shaker, Paul
    Shermer, Thomas
    Smart, Carolyn
    Smith, Don
    Vaid, Bhuvinder
    van Baarsen, Amanda
    Warner, D'Arcy
    Waterhouse, John
    Zandvliet, David
    Open Session
    Absent:
    Caufield, Sarah
    Dunnet, Margo
    Gencay, Ramo
    Kelly, Vanessa
    Li, Wei
    Liljedahi, Peter
    Louie, Brandt
    MacKenzie, Christine
    MacLean, David
    McArthur, James
    Pinto, Mario
    Rebman, Rachelle
    Weeks, Daniel
    Williams, Peter
    In attendance:
    Fee, Jane
    Glasser, Uwe
    Harestad, Alton
    Jones, John
    Schulte, Oliver
    Sterling, Lisa
    Waddell, Charlotte
    Woodbury, Rob
    Wrenn, Phyllis
    Ross, Kate, Registrar and Senior Director, Student Enrolment
    . ?
    Watt, Alison, Director, University Secretariat
    Grant, Bobbie, Recording Secretary

    S.M.
    5
    March 2007
    Page 2
    A
    The
    pproval
    Agenda
    of
    was
    the Agendaapproved
    ?
    as distributed.
    2. ?
    Approval of the Minutes of the O
    p
    en Session of Februar
    y
    5,
    2007
    The Minutes were approved as distributed.
    Business Arisin
    g
    from the Minutes
    There was no business arising from the Minutes.
    4.
    Report of the Chair
    The Chair reported that Provincial funding for higher education continues to expand. In
    addition to the continuation of 25,000 seat accessibility funding for both infrastructure
    and enrolment, the Government has committed funding for an increase of 2,500 graduate
    student enrolments over four years. Although allocation details have not yet been
    determined, it is known that these enrolments will be targeted between science and non-
    science (60/40 split) and the seats will be allocated on a competitive basis. The
    Government has also established
    I
    graduate fellowships and graduate internships which
    will fund graduate students and their faculty advisors/mentors on projects linked to
    industrial applications.
    Although there was a cause for celebration in terms of the attention and weight of
    financial resources being allocated to post-secondary education, the Chair wished to
    stress that the funding formula still does not include inflation considerations and the
    University's budget remains in a certain amount of difficulty.
    5.
    question Period
    In response to an inquiry for a progress update on the Task Force on Faculty Structure
    and the construction of the new buildings north of Strand Hall, the following information
    was provided.
    Following several meetings of the Phase 2 Task Force, a call for proposals was issued to
    members of the university community and a one day workshop dealing with the question
    of how to better support interdisciplinary research and teaching programs has been
    scheduled for March 23, 2007. Several working groups will be formed in the near future
    to consider the specific proposals that have been received for reconfiguring departments
    and Faculties within the University.
    The Arts and Social Sciences building is scheduled for completion in time for the start of
    the summer semester but there is some doubt that the contractor can meet that deadline.
    The Health Sciences building is scheduled to be completed in May/June 2008 and
    appears to be on schedule and on budget.
    6.
    Reports of Committees
    A) ?
    Senate Committee on Universit
    y
    Priorities
    i) ?
    Paper S.07-28 - External Review - De
    partment
    of French
    Moved by J. Waterhouse, seconded by J. Pierce

    S.M.
    5
    March 2007
    Page 3
    • ?
    "that Senate approve the recommendations from the Senate Committee
    on University Priorities concerning advice to the Department of French
    and the Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences on priority items
    resulting from the External Review"
    P. Wrenn, Chair, Department of French, was in attendance to respond to questions.
    The question was called, and a vote taken. ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    ii)
    Paper S.07-29 - External Review - School of Com
    putin g
    Science
    Moved by J. Waterhouse, seconded by B. Lewis
    "that Senate approve the recommendations from the Senate Committee
    on University Priorities concerning advice to the School of Computing
    Science and the Dean of Applied Sciences on priority items resulting
    from the External Review"
    U. Glasser, Director, School of Computing Science, was in attendance to respond to
    questions.
    The question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    iii)
    Paper
    S.07-30 - External Review - Environmental Science Program
    0 ?
    Moved by J. Waterhouse, seconded by I. Gordon
    "that Senate approve the recommendations from the Senate Committee
    on University Priorities concerning advice to the Environmental Science
    Program and the Dean of Science on priority items resulting from the
    External Review"
    A. Harestad, Program Director, was in attendance in order to respond to questions.
    Reference was made to the negative comments about the program which were made by
    the external reviewers. The view was expressed that given the constraints on the program,
    it was very successful in that enrolments were high. Furthermore, students in the
    program were finding no difficulty in securing Co-op placements and appeared to be
    highly employable.
    A concern was expressed about the process and how the recommendations were arrived
    at. Particular reference was made to the recommendation concerning Faculty and
    Department structure. It was suggested that the related departments in question should
    have fully participated in the process, and that related Faculty Deans should also have
    been consulted. It was pointed out that the recommendation encourages these units to
    participate in examining the possibility of a different departmental/faculty structure.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    r

    S.M.
    5
    March 2007
    Page
    4
    iv)
    Paper
    S.07-31 - Joint Major and Joint Honors Pro
    g
    ram in Computing Science
    and Philosophy
    Moved by J. Waterhouse, seconded by M. Hayes
    "that Senate approve and recommend to the Board of Governors, the
    proposal for a Joint Major and Joint Honors in Computing Science and
    Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences and the Faculty of
    Applied Sciences"
    0. Schulte, Department of Philosophy and School of Computing Science, was in
    attendance in order to respond to questions.
    It was pointed out that in order to be consistent with requirements in the Department of
    Philosophy, the credit hours shown on page
    5
    and 6 for the lower division requirements
    for both the major and the honors degree, should read
    '15'
    instead of '16'. 0. Schulte
    advised Senate that at the request of SCUP, the 15 had been changed to 16 credit hours. It
    was felt that approval of the program should not be held up by this discrepancy but
    members of the related departments were asked to follow-up and resolve the issue.
    In response to an inquiry, Senate was advised that students completing this joint program
    could choose to receive either a B.A. or a B.Sc. degree.
    Brief discussion took place about the course requirements and, in some Senators'
    opinions, the prescriptiveness of the program.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    v)
    Paper S.07-32 - M.Sc. Concentration in Global Health
    Moved by J. Waterhouse, seconded by M. Hayes
    "that Senate approve and recommend to the Board of Governors the
    proposal for a new Global Health concentration within the M.Sc. in
    Population and Public Health in the Faculty of Health Sciences"
    M. Joffres, Senator and Graduate Program Chair, Faculty of Health Sciences, was
    available to respond to questions.
    Brief discussion took place with respect to how students in the program were funded and
    the nature of the global content. Examples were provided of the current placements of
    students around the world
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    vi)
    Pap
    er S.07-33 - Children's Health Polic
    y
    Centre
    Moved by J. Waterhouse, seconded by M. Hayes
    ?
    0

    S.M.
    5
    March 2007
    Page
    5
    • ?
    "that Senate approve and recommend to the Board of Governors the
    creation of the Children's Health Policy Centre as a Schedule A Centre
    within the Faculty of Health
    Sciences"
    C. Waddell, Faculty of Health Sciences, was in attendance in order to respond to
    questions.
    Reference was made to page 4 and clarification was requested as to what was meant by
    the term 'affiliate appointments'. Following determination that affiliate appointments
    referred to affiliate memberships, inquiry was made as to whether it was appropriate for
    the Director alone to approve such memberships. Senate was advised that the intent was
    that memberships would be determined in a participatory, democratic process but the
    Director would have responsibility for the oversight of the whole process. In response to
    an inquiry about the distinction between core and affiliate memberships, Senate was
    advised that the intent was to recognize core persons making a full time commitment to
    the work and issues related to the Centre and to encourage participation of a wider group
    through an affiliate category. It was suggested that those responsible for the Centre
    should consider moving to more of a consensus model of membership, rather than the
    hierarchical structure of affiliate and core members contained in the present constitution.
    Reference was made to the proposed establishment of primary appointments to the Centre
    and inquiry was made as to whether there was an intention for the Centre to become a
    department. Senate was informed that there was no such intention. Research staff were
    considered an essential part of the Centre and a primary association through a full or part
    • ?
    time job provided support and continuity for faculty and research programs.
    A general concern was expressed about the proliferation of centres and institutes being
    established without a lot of structure and operational commonality. A suggestion was
    made that the Faculty Structure Task Force might look at this issue with a view to
    bringing more coherence to the establishment of these units.
    Brief discussion took place with respect to the section on funding on page 4. There was
    no objection to a suggestion to insert the words "research grants" after the words "peer
    reviewed".
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    vii)
    ?
    Pa p
    er S.07-34 - First Nations Universit y -wide Strate g
    ic Plan
    Prior to moving the motion, Senate was advised that the motion should be amended to
    include recommendation to the Board of Governors.
    Moved by J. Waterhouse, seconded by A. van Baarsen
    "that Senate approve and recommend to the Board of Governors the
    proposed First Nations University-wide Strategic Plan"
    L. Sterling, Special Advisor to the Vice President Academic and Director, Aboriginal
    Affairs, was in attendance in order to respond to questions.

    S.M.
    5
    March 2007
    Page 6
    Questions arose with respect to the consultation process with First Nations communities.
    Senate was advised that Elders, who subsequently consulted with their Chiefs,
    participated during the two year consultation period. There was also a meeting with
    approximately 100 Chiefs in the Province but the final draft before Senate has not been
    circulated to the outside community.
    In response to questions about the hiring process and whether leaders in the native
    community would be involved in the appointment process, Senate was advised that
    SFU's normal appointment procedures would be followed but there was nothing in the
    policies prohibiting consultation and input from relevant communities.
    Reference was made to the third point of the First Nations Guiding Principles on page
    25,
    and an inquiry was made as to whether the support mentioned existed or whether this was
    a statement of policy. It was pointed out that Senate had approved Appendix B several
    years ago as a statement of policy and one of the reasons for moving the Plan forward at
    this time and establishing the First Nations office was to take advantage of the various
    Government programs being developed around funding for First Nations faculty, students
    and programs. An opinion was expressed that any internal grants created by the
    University should involve the Senate Policy Committee on Scholarships, Awards and
    Bursaries. In response to an inquiry as to whether there were contingency plans should
    external funding not be successful, Senate was advised that upon approval of the
    document, the office would be established and, as the document indicates,
    implementation of the plan would occur over a five year period as funding became
    available.
    Page 16 of the document referred to facilities development at the Kamloops campus and
    the exploration of expanded partnership opportunities with First Nations communities in
    the area. An inquiry was made for further information. Senate was advised that there
    were ongoing discussions with the Kamloops Indian Band and the Provincial
    Government with respect to improving and expanding the facilities at the Kamloops
    campus. It was pointed out that SFU's presence in Kamloops was complicated by the
    mandate of Thompson Rivers University to provide service to First Nations students but
    discussions were underway with TRU with respect to how the two institutions might
    cooperate to provide a broader range of programming and service to a wider range of
    students in the Kamloops area.
    Referring to the issue of resources for First Nations faculty members referenced on page
    18, a statement was made that CAUT had identified the need and desire of First Nations
    faculty to spend a great deal of time in one-to-one mentorship with their students, and
    that this level of involvement could be detrimental to fulfilling requirements for tenure
    and a compromise to their teaching position. An opinion was expressed that additional
    support resources were required for First Nations faculty appointments, and a suggestion
    was made that this might be an issue for the Task Force to review. Senate was advised
    that the First Nations Office would act as a resource centre for both faculty and students
    and would have a role in the mentorship process.
    Speaking to the resource requirements outlined on page 17, a question was raised as to
    why it was necessary for the Research and Program Director to be designated as a person
    of First Nations heritage. A concern was expressed that having the position so designated
    would exclude possible candidates who are well known as experts for their research in
    First Nations studies. The Vice-President Academic agreed that the person occupying the

    S.M.
    5
    March 2007
    Page 7
    • position of program director should have such expertise and would notnecessatily have
    to be of First Nations descent; however, membership in the First Nations community was
    absolutely necessary for the community liaison position and it was permissible to make
    such a designation under the B.C. Human Rights Code.
    Discussion turned to the issue of academic program development as mentioned on page
    14 of the document. A concern was expressed about the modification of course content to
    meet the needs of any one specific group of people. It was pointed out that the
    responsibility for curriculum development resides with academic programs and
    departments and ultimately with Senate, and that the First Nations Office was required to
    work in partnership and collaboration with academic units with respect to the curriculum.
    Senate was reminded that the document was a strategic plan stating general directions
    and encouraging certain developments. Specific actions will come forward to Senate at
    which time a full debate will take place.
    Question was called, and a vote taken. ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    The Chair wished to reiterate the earlier point made by R. Russell acknowledging the
    University Administration for bringing this initiative forward and to thank the Vice-
    President Academic, Lisa Sterling and the Advisory Committee for their work on this
    issue.
    viii) Pa
    per
    S
    .07-3
    5
    Master's Pro
    g ram in Di gital
    Media
    0 ?
    Moved by J. Waterhouse, seconded by B. Lewis
    "that Senate approve and recommend to the Board of Governors the
    proposal for the Master's program in Digital Media"
    R. Woodbury, Graduate Program Chair, School of Interactive Arts and Technology, was
    in attendance in order to respond to questions.
    Discussion ensued with respect to the issue of degree credential. It was noted that the
    governing bodies of all four partner institutions - UBC, SFU, BC1T and Emily Carr -
    will approve curriculum and grant the degree.
    With respect to faculty participation in the program, Senate was advised that the program
    was intended to generate sufficient support through tuition fees and general endowment
    funds to fund faculty positions at each institution. The initial allocation is one position to
    each institution, with the initial program offering making use of current faculty.
    An inquiry was raised with respect to the status of students at GNWC. It was pointed out
    that students would be housed in a program jointly offered by four institutions and
    located at the Great Northern Way Campus. Senate was advised that a detailed
    Memorandum of Understanding had been developed covering such areas as human
    rights, academic freedom, harassment, faculty hiring, student conduct and appeal
    processes. All processes were reviewed and were deemed to be consistent with SFU
    ?
    policies and provide for fair treatment for faculty and students. Brief discussion followed
    with respect to the student appeal process.

    S.M.
    5
    March 2007
    Page 8
    It was noted that this program has already been advertised and was accepting applications
    for September even though the program was
    still
    going through the degree approval
    process. A concern was raised about this trend to pre-advertise.
    A concern was expressed that there was no student representation within the governing
    structure of GNWC, and an inquiry was made as to whether GNWC students would
    belong to any society or student group. Senate was advised that opportunity for students
    to participate on the academic governance and program committees has been built into
    the process, and that students would be free to organize themselves. However, since there
    were no students at the present time no action has occurred.
    Question was called, and a vote taken. ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    B) ?
    Senate Graduate Studies Committee
    i)
    Paper S.07-36 - Annual Re
    p
    ort (For Information)
    It was noted that when last year's annual report was presented to Senate, it was agreed
    that in future details of Post-Graduate Scholarships and Canada Graduate Scholarships
    would be included in the SSHRC data. This had not been done. The Chair requested the
    Dean of Graduate Studies to note the request and bring the relevant information back to
    Senate.
    Secretary's note. The additional information requested has been provided by Dr. Driver
    as follows:
    In 2006, 47 SFU students held doctoral awards from SSHRC. Of those 32 students held
    SSHRC Doctoral Fellowships, and 15 students held SSHRC CGS Doctoral Scholarships.
    Following this discussion, Senate received the 2006 Annual Report of the Senate
    Graduate Studies Committee for information.
    ii)
    Paper S.07-37 - Curriculum Revisions - Faculty of App lied Sciences (For
    Information)
    Senate received information that the Senate Graduate Studies Committee, acting under
    delegated authority, approved the deletion of courses, new courses, and minor changes to
    existing courses and programs in Engineering Science, Resource and Environmental
    Management, Communication, Kinesiology, and Computing Science.
    iii)
    Paper
    S.07-38 - Curriculum Revisions - Facult
    y
    of Arts and Social Sciences (For
    Information)
    Senate received information that the Senate Graduate Studies Committee, acting under
    delegated authority, approved minor changes to existing courses and program
    requirements in the following areas: Latin American Studies, Philosophy, English,
    Economics, and Urban Studies.
    iv)
    Paper S.07-39 - Curriculum Revisions - Facult
    y
    of Business Administration (For
    Information)
    Senate received information that the Senate Graduate Studies Committee, acting under
    delegated authority, approved new courses and minor changes to existing courses and
    programs in Global Asset and Wealth Management, Financial Risk Management,
    Management of Technology, and Master of Business Administration.
    Moved by J. Driver, seconded by B. Vaid

    S.M.
    5
    March 2007
    Page
    9
    "that Senate approve and recommend to the Board of Governors program
    changes to the Master of Business Administration"
    Senate was advised that the revised MBA program replaces the Specialist MBA program
    previously deleted by Senate.
    Question was called, and a vote taken. ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    v)
    Paper S.0740 - Cuniculum Revisions - Faculty
    of Education (For Information)
    Senate received information that the Senate Graduate Studies Committee, acting under
    delegated authority, approved a new course and minor program changes to the
    Educational Psychology program.
    vi)
    Paper S.0741 - Curriculum Revisions - Facult
    y of Science (For Information)
    Senate received information that the Senate Graduate Studies Committee, acting under
    delegated authority, approved new courses and minor program changes in Earth Sciences,
    Physics, and Molecular Biology and Biochemistry.
    B) ?
    Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies
    i)
    Paper S.0742 - Curriculum Revisions - Facult
    y
    of App lied Sciences (For
    Information)
    • ?
    Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting
    under delegated authority, approved new courses, and minor changes to existing
    programs and courses in Interactive Arts and Technology, Computing Science,
    Engineering Science, and TECHOne.
    ii)
    Paper S.07-43 - Curriculum Revisions - Facult
    y
    of Arts and Social Sciences (For
    Information)
    Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting
    under delegated authority, approved new courses, and minor changes to existing courses
    and programs in Philosophy, Political Science, and International Studies.
    iii)
    Paper S.0744 - Curriculum Revisions - Faculty of Business Administration (For
    Information)
    Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting
    under delegated authority, approved minor changes to existing courses and programs in
    the Faculty of Business Administration.
    iv)
    Paper S.07-45 - Curriculum Revisions - Facult
    y of Education (For Information)
    Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting
    under delegated authority, approved a list of W designated courses in the Faculty of
    Education.
    v)
    Paper S.0746 - Curriculum Revisions - Faculty of Health Sciences (For
    Information)
    • Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting
    under delegated authority, approved a new course and minor changes to existing courses
    in the Faculty of Health Sciences.

    S.M.
    5
    March 2007
    Page 10
    vi)
    Paper S.07-47 - Curriculum Revisions - Facult
    y
    of Science (For Information)
    Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting
    under delegated authority, approved a prerequisite change for MATH 310.
    vii)
    Pa p
    er S.07-48 - Co-Op Courses
    Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting
    under delegated authority, approved the addition of the sentence:
    Credits from this course
    do not count towards the credits required for an SFU degree
    to the calendar course
    description for all Co-op designated courses.
    D)
    Senate Librar
    y
    Committee
    i) ?
    Paper S.0749 - Annual Re
    port (For Information)
    Senate received the
    2005/06
    Annual Report of the Senate Library Committee, including a
    report from the Library Penalties Appeal Committee, for information.
    E)
    Senate Committee on A
    g
    enda and Rules
    i) ?
    Paper S.07-50 - Interpretation Clause for Polic
    y
    B10.06 - Presidential Search
    Committee
    Moved by P. Percival, seconded by M. Hayes
    "that Senate approve and recommend to the Board of Governors that a
    new section be added to Policy B 10.06 Presidential Search Committee as
    follows:
    Interpretation
    Questions of interpretation or application of this policy or its procedures
    shall be referred to the Chair of the Board of Governors and the Vice-
    Chair of Senate, who will jointly make a decision which shall be final."
    Question was called, and a vote taken. ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    F)
    Senate Nominatin g
    Committee
    i) ?
    Paper S.07-51 - Elections
    Senate was advised that no further nominations had been received. Due to the shortness
    of time, vacancies will not be carried forward until the June Senate meeting at which time
    regular elections will be take place. Senators were advised that the Senate Nominating
    Committee was starting to canvass people for committee positions starting in June for
    next year and that an email will be sent out shortly outlining the positions available.
    7. ?
    Other Business
    There was no other business.
    Information
    The date of the next regularly scheduled meeting of Senate is Monday, April 2, 2007.
    The Open Session adjourned at
    8:55
    pm and Senate moved directly into Closed Session.
    Alison Watt
    Director, University Secretariat

    Back to top