DRAFT UNTIL APPROVED BY SENATE
Minutes of a meeting of the Senate of Simon Fraser University held on
?
Monday, February
5,
2007 at
5:30
pm in Room 3210 WMC
[I
.
Present:
Stevenson, Michael, President and Chair
Black; Sam
Breden, Felix
Copeland, Lynn
Corbett Kitty
Dagenais, Diane
Dickinson, Peter
Driver, Jon
Easton, Stephen
Ester, Martin
Fox, Graham
Francis, June
Gencay, Ramo
Gordon, Irene
Gordon, Robert
Harder, Derrick
Haunerland, Norbert
Hayes, Michael
Joffies, Michel
Krane, Bill
LaBrie, John
Lewis, Brian
Percival, Cohn
Percival, Paul
Peters, Joseph
Pierce, John
Pinto, Mario
Plischke, Michael
Rebman, Rachelle
Russell, Robert
Shaker, Paul
Smart, Carolyn
Vaid, Bhuvinder
van Baarsen, Amanda
Warner, D'Arcy
Waterhouse, John
Williams, Peter
Open Session
Absent:
Caufield, Sarah
Deigrande, John
Dunnet, Margo
Fizzell, Maureen
Gregory, Titus
Honda, Barry
Javed, Waseem
Kelly, Vanessa
Lewis, Glyn
Li, Wei
Liljedahl, Peter
Louie, Brandt
MacKenzie, Christine
MacLean, David
McArthur, James
Schellenberg, Betty
Shermer, Thomas
Smith, Don
Weeks, Daniel
Zandvliet, David
In attendance:
Amundsen, Cheryl
Dawkins, Heather
Hibbitts, Pat
Ross, Kate, Registrar and Senior Director, Student Enrolment
Watt, Alison, Director, University Secretariat
Grant, Bobbie, Recording Secretary
0
S.M.
5
February 2007
Page 2
A pp roval of the Agenda
The Agenda was approved as distributed.
?
2.
?
Approval of the Minutes of the O
p
en Session of Januar
y
8, 2007
The Minutes were approved as distributed.
Business Arisin
g
from the Minutes
There was no business arising from the Minutes.
?
4.
?
Report of the Chair
i)
President's Annual Open Forum
Referring to the Annual Open Forum which had been held on January 31, 2007, the Chair
advised that since he had given a lengthy report on the state of the university at that time,
he would not repeat matters but would be pleased to respond to any questions.
ii)
Registrar and Senior Director, Student Enrolment
On behalf of Senate and the University, the Chair welcomed SFU' s new Registrar and
Senior Director, Student Enrolment, Kate Ross, to Simon Fraser University.
?
5. ?
Question Period
In light of circumstances that occurred during recent adverse weather conditions and the
concerns raised about SFU's safety precautions, Senator Gençay wondered whether it
would be prudent for the University to subject their internal procedures to an external
review. The Vice-President, Finance and Administration advised Senate that existing
policies and procedures are currently under an internal review but there are no plans to
implement an external review. A variety of issues including better communication to all
sectors of the University, a plan to accommodate those who might find themselves stuck
on campus, and control of traffic on the roads were under consideration.
The Chair reported that the University currently has a policy with respect to emergency
preparedness that is, in a sense, externally reviewed because it has to meet Provincial
legislation and integrate with provincial and local government agencies.
Senators were advised that the internal review of procedures was taking place and if
anyone had specific suggestions or comments on this issue, they were invited to submit
them to the Vice-President, Finance and Administration.
?
6. ?
Reports of Committees
A)
?
Senate Committee on Universit
y
Priorities
i) ?
Paper S.07-14 - Institute for the Stud
y
of Teachin g and Learnin g
in the
Disciplines
Moved by J. Waterhouse, seconded by B. Vaid
"that Senate approve and recommend to the Board of Governors the
creation of the Institute for the Study of Teaching and Learning in the
Disciplines as a Schedule B Institute reporting to the Vice-President,
Academic"
S.M.
5
February 2007
Page 3
0 ?
C. Amundsen, Faculty of Education, was in attendance to respond to questions.
In response to questions about the meaning of the word 'Disciplines' in the title, and why
this was being proposed as a Schedule B institute rather than a Schedule A institute,
Senate was advised that 'Disciplines' referred to all the disciplines taught at SFU. Since
the intent of the new institute was to encompass individuals from all faculties and
programs across the university, it was felt that a Schedule B institute was more
appropriate.
Discussion turned to the issue of funding and review mechanisms. Senate was advised
that the Vice-President Academic agreed to provide funding for a two-year period, and
before funding was renewed, the activities of the Institute would be reviewed prior to
determining whether funding would be continued. The process for review had not yet
been determined but could include an external person in addition to consultation with the
Director of the Institute. It was also pointed out that centres and institutes are required to
complete an annual report, a summary of which is submitted to Senate and the Board of
Governors for information. The annual report for this Institute will be submitted to the
Vice-President, Research by the Vice-President, Academic. In answer to a question
about which other centres report to the Vice-President, Academic, it was noted that the
David See-Chai Lam Centre also reports to the Vice-President, Academic.
In response to questions concerning capacity and space, Senate was advised that capacity
will depend on the research funding that can be attracted, and that appropriate
•
?
accommodation for the institute will be provided following several departmental moves
to new buildings that will take place towards the end of the Spring semester.
The question was called, and a vote taken.
?
MOTION CARRIED
ii) ?
Paper S.07-1
5
- Major. Minor and Honors in World Literature
Moved by J. Waterhouse, seconded by J. Pierce
"that Senate approve and recommend to the Board of Governors, the
proposal for a Major, Minor and Honors Program in World Literature"
H. Dawkins, Associate Dean of Arts and Social Sciences, was in attendance to respond to
questions.
Referring to page 7, a minor error was noted for the course entitled Human Rights
Literature. It should be listed as WL 204 and not WL
205.
In response to a question about the location of course offerings, Senate was advised that
most of the courses in the program would be offered at Burnaby.
A question arose about students having an opportunity to read selected texts in the
original language, and a concern was expressed that the wording about this on page 6
seemed rather loose, especially since this was felt to be a very appropriate requirement
• for this type of program. Senate was advised that the language requirement and reading
proficiency in another language was targeted to the honors students since it was felt that
this was a good place to start, but the issue would be assessed as the program develops.
S.M.
5
February 2007
Page
4
B)The ?
question
Senate
was
Committee
called, and
on
a
Undervote
taken.
g raduate
?
Studies
MOTION CARRIED
?
•
i)
Paper S.07-16 - Curriculum Revisions - Faculty
of Applied Sciences (For
Information)
Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting
under delegated authority, approved new courses, and minor changes to existing
programs and courses in the following areas: Interactive Arts and Technology,
Computing Science.
ii)
Paper S.07-17 - Curriculum Revisions - Faculty
of Arts and Social Sciences (For
Information)
Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting
under delegated authority, approved the deletion of non-W version calendar entries for
Writing courses, and changes to the Statistics program in the Faculty of Arts and Social
Sciences.
iii)
Paper
S.07-18 - Curriculum Revisions - Faculty
of Business Administration (For
Information)
Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting
under delegated authority, approved an Undergraduate Honors Semester at Segal
Graduate School of Business, including three new courses; changes to the breadth
requirement for the Major Program, minor changes to Management Science
concentration, and a change of credit hour for an existing course.
iv)
Pa per
S.07-19 - Curriculum Revisions - Faculty of Education (For Information)
Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting
under delegated authority, approved changes to description and prerequisite for existing
courses in Education.
v)
Paper S.07-20 - Curriculum Revisions - Facult
y of Health Sciences (For
Information)
Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting
under delegated authority, approved five Co-op Practicum courses.
vi)
Paper S.07-21 - Curriculum Revisions - Facult
y of Science (For Information)
Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting
under delegated authority, approved new courses, and minor changes to existing
programs and courses in the following areas: Biological Sciences, Chemistry, Molecular
Biology and Biochemistry, Physics, Statistics and Actuarial Science, Mathematics, and
Earth Sciences. It was also noted that CIIEM 120 would not be deleted as it was required
for the Mechatronics program.
vii)
Paper
S.07-22 - Second De gree
WOB Requirements
Prior to moving the motion, B. Krane made a minor revision to delete reference to the
review prior to 2011. He explained that an issue had been raised at SCUS by the
representative of the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences who requested that a time limit
be placed on the action until the matter had been reviewed by the Faculty. Subsequently
S.M.
5
February 2007
Page
5
is
the FASS member advised that there was no objection by the Faculty to the time limit
being removed.
Moved by B. Krane, seconded by J. Waterhouse
"that Senate approve that students admitted to a second degree program
be deemed to have met the Breadth requirements, one of the Q
requirements and one of the W requirements"
An opinion was expressed that without verifying the courses taken in a first degree, there
was no guarantee that the breadth requirements of the core curriculum had been met, and
concern was expressed about giving a blanket exemption based solely on the fact that a
student already had a degree. The Committee felt that within bachelor degree programs at
most institutions, particularly within Canada, students have obtained sufficient exposure
to other disciplines and would have appropriate breadth experience.
The issue of having writing and quantitative requirements for a second degree program at
all was raised, especially for students who complete a first degree at SFU and have
already satisfied the WQB requirements, and a suggestion was made that any further
WQB requirement for those students be waived. Senate was advised that the intent was
that any student taking a second degree, including students whose first degree was from
SF0, must take additional WQB requirements. It was noted that the first students subject
to graduation requirements with WQB were admitted in Fall 2006 and therefore they
would not graduate until 2010 or 2011 at the very earliest and perhaps a review around
2011 would be appropriate.
In order to clarify the Q requirement, a suggestion to change the wording from 'one of
the Q requirements' to 'three credits of Q requirements' was accepted as a friendly
amendment.
Brief discussion ensued about the writing requirement. It was pointed out that one of the
W requirements must be an upper division course within the student's discipline so if a
student engaged in a second degree in a different discipline from the first, exposure to a
discipline specific upper division writing course would be beneficial.
An amendment was moved by T. Brennand, seconded by B. Krane
"that the phrase - one of the W requirements - be changed to read: the
lower division W requirement"
The vote was called on the amendment.
?
AMENDMENT CARRIED
An amendment was moved by P. Dickinson, seconded by J. Waterhouse
"that the phrase "and that this be reviewed prior to 2011" be reinserted in
the motion"
The vote was called on the amendment.
?
AMENDMENT CARRIED
The motion, as amended, was read prior to a vote being taken.
"that Senate approve that students admitted to a second degree program
be deemed to have met the Breadth requirements, 3 credits of the Q
S.M.
5
February 2007
Page 6
requirements, and the lower division W requirement, and that this be
reviewed prior to 2011"
?
0
The question was called, and a vote taken. MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, CARRIED
C)
?
Senate Graduate Studies Committee
i)
Paper S.07-23 - Chan
g
e to Terms of Reference - SGSC
Moved by J. Driver, seconded by S. Easton
"that Senate approve the addition of the following sentence to the Terms
of Reference of the Senate Graduate Studies Committee: To consider and
decide on policy recommendations concerning graduate course
registration, course and program withdrawal procedures, and on the
administration of graduate records"
The question was called, and a vote taken.
?
MOTION CARRIED
ii)
Paper S.07-24 - Curriculum Revisions - Faculty
of App lied Sciences (For
Information)
Senate received information that the Senate Graduate Studies Committee, acting under
delegated authority, approved two new courses and a minor change to an existing course
in Interactive Arts and Technology.
iii)
Paper
S.07-25 -
Curriculum Revisions - Facult
y
of Arts and Social Sciences (For
Information)
Senate received information that the Senate Graduate Studies Committee, acting under
delegated authority, approved new courses and minor changes to existing courses and
program requirements in the following areas: Linguistics, Sociology and Anthropology.
iv)
Paper S.07-26 - Curriculum Revisions - Faculty
of Health Sciences (For
Information)
Senate received information that the Senate Graduate Studies Committee, acting under
delegated authority, approved the deletion of four courses, two new courses, and minor
revisions to existing courses in Global Health.
D) ?
Senate Nominatin
g
Committee
i) ?
Paper S.07-27 - Elections
Senate was advised that no further nominations had been received. Peter Tingling
(Faculty Member position) and Derrick Harder (Undergraduate Student position) were
therefore elected by acclamation to the Senate Committee on Academic Integrity in
Student Learning and Evaluation (SCAISLE); Amanda van Baarsen (Student Senator
position) was elected by acclamation to the Electoral Standing Committee (ESC); and
June Francis (Senator position) was elected by acclamation to the Senate Committee on
Continuing Studies (SCCS). Balloting to elect one Student resulted in the election of
Naava Smolash to the Research Ethics Board (REB): The remaining vacancies will be
carried forward to the next meeting.
[Secretary's note: Naava Smolash could not take
S.M.
5
February 2007
0
?
Page 7
up
her position on the REB because of a teaching conflict, so the candidate with the next
highest number of votes, Karen Tse, was declared elected]
Other Business
i) ?
Declaration of Vacancy - Senate Membership
Senate was advised that due to resignation, two Student Senator positions were currently
vacant. Since there was insufficient time to hold a by-election, the positions will remain
vacant for the balance of the term of office.
Information
The date of the next regularly scheduled meeting of Senate is Monday, March
5,
2007.
The Open Session adjourned at
6:15
pm and Senate moved directly into Closed Session.
Alison Watt
Director, University Secretariat
L
0