. DRAFT UNTIL APPROVED BY SENATE
    Minutes of a Meeting of the Senate of Simon Fraser University held on
    ?
    Monday, November 1, 2004 in Room 3210 WMC at 5:30 pm
    ?
    Open Session
    Present: Stevenson, Michael, President and Chair of Senate
    ?
    Absent:
    Beynon, Peter
    Blackman, Roger
    Breden, Felix
    Brennand, Tracy
    Budd, James
    Copeland, Lynn
    da Silva, Gisele
    Dean, Charmaine
    Deigrande, James
    Dickinson, John
    Apaak, Clement
    Fung, Edward
    Haunerland, Norbert
    Higgins, Anne
    Horvath, Adam
    Mauser, Gary
    McArthur, James
    McFetridge, Paul
    McInnes, Marcia
    Scott, Jamie
    Shaker, Paul
    Smith, Don
    Tombe, Trevor
    Wessel, Sylvia
    Wong, Milton
    Yerbury, Cohn
    Driver, Jon
    Dunsterville, Valerie
    Easton, Stephen
    Fizzell, Maureen
    Giacomantonio, Chris
    Gordon, Irene
    Gordon, Robert
    Grimmett, Peter
    • ?
    Gupta, Kamal
    Harder, Derrick
    Hayes, Michael
    Honda, Barry
    Hunsdale, Shawn
    Johansen, Elinor
    Jones, John (representing Brian Lewis)
    Krane, Bill
    Li, Ze-Nian
    Love, Ernie
    MacLean, David
    MacKenzie, Christine
    McKinnon, Stephanie
    Percival, Paul
    Pierce, John
    Pinto, Mario
    Plischke, Michael
    Rozell, Sara
    Sears, Camilla
    Schellenberg, Betty
    Waterhouse, John
    Weeks, Daniel
    Wong, Josephine
    Woodbury, Robert
    Zandvliet, David
    Heath, Ron, Dean of Student Services/Registrar
    Watt, Alison, Director, University Secretariat
    Grant, Bobbie, Recording Secretary
    In attendance:
    Allen, Diana
    Berube, Denis
    Hibbitts, Pat
    Weinberg, Hal
    Whittlesea, Bruce

    S.M. 1 November 2004
    Page 2
    Approval of the Agenda
    The Agenda was approved as distributed.
    2.
    Approval of the Minutes of the O
    p
    en Session of October 4, 2004
    Reference was made to the motion on page 4. It was pointed out that the word 'set' was
    missing from the phrase 'as set forth'. Following this correction, the Minutes were
    approved.
    3.
    Business Arisin
    g
    from the Minutes
    There was no business arising from the Minutes.
    4.
    Report of the Chair
    i) ?
    Paper S.04-77 - Annual financial Statements (For Information)
    P. Hibbitts, Vice-President, Finance and Administration, and D. Berube, Director,
    Finance and Ancillary Services, were in attendance in order to respond to questions.
    Brief discussion ensued with respect to the timing of the report and its presentation to
    Senate. Senate was advised that the report was normally forwarded to Senate in
    September but this year there were a number of circumstances, including systems
    changes, that resulted in a delay this year.
    Reference was made to page 2 and concern was expressed about what appeared to be a
    budget surplus in the section entitled "Summary of Appropriations". It was noted that the
    carry over budget appeared to have significantly increased since last year and an inquiry
    was made about this growth. Senate was advised that the carry forward was not
    completely surplus money and one of the problems was the way it was reported in the
    statements and this is being looked into. Senate was advised that all of the amounts apart
    from the Departmental carryovers ($18,228,000) were committed. Department carryovers
    identified as commitments by departments for spending were brought into budget, and
    the remainder would be available for the future. One significant reason for the increase
    in the Appropriations was the one-time-only funding received from the Provincial
    Government at the very end of the last fiscal year which was committed primarily to
    capital purchases in the current fiscal year.
    In response to an inquiry about why there was a discrepancy between the amounts for
    revenue/expenses on page 2 and those on page 8, Senate was advised that the figures on
    page 2 reflected the operating fund of the University that was the budget approved by the
    Board of Governors. The numbers on page 8 incorporate all of the activities of the
    university and therefore reflect a larger number than just the operating budget.
    Suggestion was made that perhaps the title on page 8 should be changed since the current
    title implied an operations budget. Although the overlap between the terms operating
    fund and operations was acknowledged, it was pointed out that these terms have been
    used consistently as standard terminology in the report for many years and it was better to
    retain
    Reference
    them
    was
    in order
    made
    to
    to
    avoid
    the debentures
    potential confusion.listed
    on
    ?
    page 14 and the repayment of principle
    0
    and interest on the next page. Clarification was requested whether the figures cover the

    S.M. 1 November 2004
    principle
    Page
    and interest payments due on the total consolidated debt
    3
    or just the 16 million.
    Brief discussion followed and Senate was advised that a detailed breakdown of the
    repayments could be provided on request to D. Berube.
    Following further brief discussion about the increase in capital expenditure and revenue
    from student fees, the report was received by Senate.
    ii) The Chair reported that the University Presidents' Council was actively lobbying
    the Government with respect to funding. The public advocacy statement prepared by
    TUPC "Our Universities Our Future" which was recently distributed to Senate was felt to
    reflect the general needs of the university system in British Columbia. In addition to the
    public document, Senate was advised that TUPC produced a confidential budget
    submission to the Ministry that attaches firm numbers to the expectations outlined in the
    public document, namely funding with respect to grants and research, enrolment growth,
    infrastructure needs, student financial assistance, and graduate student funding. The
    Chair hoped to be able to report favorable progress by the end of the year or early in the
    new year.
    ?
    5.
    ?
    Question Period
    There were no questions submitted.
    . ?
    6. ?
    Reports of Committees
    A) ?
    Senate Nominatin g
    Committee
    i)
    ?
    Paper S.04-78 (Revised) - Elections
    Senate's attention was directed to the revised Senate paper S.04-78 that showed that
    additional nominations had been received. Senate was advised that Shawn Hunsdale had
    also been nominated to SCIA and his name should be added to the revised paper. The
    following are the results of elections to Senate committees.
    Senate Committee on Continuing Studies (SCCS)
    One Student Senator for term of office to May 31, 2006.
    Elected by acclamation:
    ?
    Shawn Hunsdale
    Senate Committee on International Activities (SCIA)
    One Undergraduate Student Senator to May 31, 2006.
    Elected by acclamation: ?
    Shawn Hunsdale
    Senate Committee on Disciplinar
    y App
    eals (SCODA)
    One Student (at-large) to May 31, 2005.
    Elected by acclamation: ?
    Patrick Smith
    Senate Committee on Universit
    y
    Priorities (SCUP)
    One Student Senator to May 31, 2005.
    Elected by acclamation:
    ?
    Shawn Hunsdale

    S.M. 1 November 2004
    Page 4
    Committee to Review the President Prior to Re-Appointment
    Two Faculty Senators and one Graduate Student (at-large).
    Elected by acclamation - Faculty Senators:
    ?
    Paul Percival
    Betty Schellenberg
    Ballot required - Graduate Student (at-large)
    Candidates: K. Beck, D. Grant
    Elected: ?
    Douglas Grant
    B)
    Research Ethics Board
    i) ?
    Paper S.04-79 - Annual Report (For Information)
    B. Whittlesea, Chair, Research Ethics Board, and H. Weinberg, Secretary, Research
    Ethics Board were in attendance in order to respond to questions.
    The Annual Report of the Research Ethics Board was received by Senate for information
    without questions.
    C)
    Senate Committee on Universit y
    Priorities
    i) ?
    Paper S.04-80 - External Review - Department of Earth Sciences
    Moved by J. Waterhouse, seconded by C. Sears
    "that Senate concur with the recommendations from the Senate Committee
    on University Priorities concerning advice to the Department of Earth
    Sciences on priority items resulting from the external review as outlined in
    S.04-80"
    D. Allen, Chair of the Department of Earth Sciences, was in attendance in order to
    respond to questions.
    The following is a summary of the points raised in a discussion concerned mainly with
    space and program recommendations:
    Space appeared to be the biggest issue facing Earth Sciences and an inquiry was made
    as to whether serious consideration was being given to the recommendations relevant
    to the space issue. Senate was assured that serious considerations were being given to
    this issue by the Administration and it was suggested that the motion before Senate
    commits the Dean of Science to seek every means possible to address this issue.
    Concern was expressed about two points in the report, namely reports of declining
    enrolments in Computing Science and new space opportunities available to
    Computing Science at the Surrey campus. Several Senators stressed that enrolment
    was not declining in Computing Science and the space issue at the Surrey campus
    was not relevant to the space issue at Burnaby.
    Reference was made to the departmental statement with respect to space being taken
    away from Earth Sciences in the new TASC 1 building. Opinion was expressed that

    S.M. 1 November 2004
    Page
    5
    the space allocations for the new building involved a considerable amount of complex
    negotiation resulting in the accommodation of most of Earth Sciences space needs.
    However, it was pointed out that the department's statement referred to the original
    building plans when the entire bottom floor was allocated to Earth Sciences.
    With regard to the recommendation that suggests that Earth Sciences was not
    included in the major requirements of other departments, opinion was expressed that
    there was more integration amongst programs than was implied in the document. It
    was pointed out that at least two Science programs - Physical Geography and the
    Pollutant Transport Stream in Environmental Science - required majors to take at
    least one introductory course in Earth Sciences and many of these students then go on
    to take additional courses in order to fulfill the requirements for the Association of
    Professional Geoscientists and Engineers of BC. However, it was noted that these
    courses represented very small numbers, approximately five to ten students per year,
    and was not the number of enrolments that the Department was hoping to attract.
    Senate was advised that the Environmental Science program was expected to expand
    as a result of the creation of different streams which it was felt would help to broaden
    the representation of Earth Sciences courses.
    Reference was made to the response from the Dean (recommendation 9 on page 3)
    with regard to the suggestion that Earth Sciences courses be substituted for some of
    the Geography courses in various streams. Opinion was expressed that the
    recommendation seemed to be against a spirit of collaboration. It was suggested that
    EASC courses may be underrepresented in the program, and the Steering Committee
    for the Environmental Science program was being asked to look at this issue.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    D) ?
    Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies
    i)
    Paper S.04-81 - Curriculum Revisions - Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (For
    Information)
    Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting
    under delegated authority, approved seven new courses and minor revisions to existing
    courses, program and degree requirements in the following departments/programs:
    Archaeology, Canadian Studies, and School for the Contemporary Arts.
    ii)
    Paper S.04-82 - Curriculum Revisions - Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (For
    Information)
    Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting
    under delegated authority, approved twenty new courses, fifteen course deletions, and
    minor revisions to existing courses, programs, and degree requirements in the following
    departments/programs: Economics, English, First Nations, French, Geography, History,
    Humanities, Linguistics, Political Science, Psychology, and Sociology and Anthropology.

    S.M. 1 November 2004
    Page 6
    iii) ?
    Paper S.04-83 - Curriculum Revisions - Facult
    y
    of Science (For Information)
    Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies, acting
    under delegated authority, approved one new course, two course deletions, and minor
    revisions to existing courses, programs, and degree requirements in the following
    departments: Biological Sciences, Earth Sciences, Mathematics, and Molecular Biology
    and Biochemistry.
    7.
    Other Business
    A) ?
    SFU Library
    i) ?
    Paper S.04-84 - Annual Report (For Information)
    Senate received the Annual Report of the Library for information. Senators were
    reminded of the highly positive and excellent external review that was presented to
    Senate recently.
    8.
    Information
    The next regularly scheduled meeting of Senate is scheduled for Monday, December 6,
    2004, with agenda items for the December meeting due November 18, 2004.
    Open Session adjourned at 6:15 pm. Following a five minute recess, Senate moved into Closed
    Session.
    Alison Watt
    Director, University Secretariat
    0

    Back to top