DRAFT UNTIL APPROVED BY SENATE
    Minutes of a Meeting of the Senate of Simon Fraser University held on
    ?
    Monday, November 3, 2003 at
    5:15
    pm in Room 3210 WMC
    Open Session
    Present:
    ?
    Stevenson, Michael
    President and Chair of Senate
    Apaak, Clement
    Beynon, Peter
    Cameron, Rob (representing B. Lewis)
    Clayman, Bruce
    da Silva, Gisele
    D'Auria, John
    Dickinson, John
    Driver, Jon
    Dunsterville, Valerie
    Fairey, Elaine (representing L. Copeland)
    Fizzell, Maureen
    Fung, Edward
    Giacomantonio, Chris
    Gill, Alison
    Gillies, Mary Ann (representing J. Pierce)
    Gregory, Titus
    Grimmett, Peter
    Haunerland, Norbert
    Heaney, John
    Higgins, Anne
    Hira, Andy
    Horvath, Adam
    Krane, Bill
    Lemay, Joanne
    Love, Ernie
    McFetridge, Paul
    Percival, Paul
    Plischke, Michael
    Rozell, Sara
    Sears, Camilla
    Shaker, Paul
    Thandi, Ranbir
    Tombe, Trevor
    Van Aalst, Jan
    Waterhouse, John
    Weeks, Dan
    Wessel, Sylvia
    Wong, Josephine
    Yerbury, Cohn
    Absent:
    Atkins, Stella
    Brennand, Tracy
    Budd, James
    Gordon, Robert
    Gupta, Kamal
    Honda, Barry
    Jones, Cohn
    Kaila, Pam
    Kalanj, Tiffany
    Mauser, Gary
    McArthur, James
    Naef, Barbara
    Peters, Joseph
    Scott, Jamie
    Smith, Don
    Wong, Milton
    Woodbury, Rob
    Yoo, Rick
    In attendance:
    Brandhorst, Bruce
    Brohman, John
    French, Charlotte
    Gupta, Arvind
    Kenny, Michael
    Smith, Michael
    • ?
    Heath, Ron, Dean of Student Services/Registrar
    Watt, Alison, Director, University Secretariat
    Grant, Bobbie, Recording Secretary

    S.M. 3 November 2003
    Page 2
    Following the announcement by the Chair of the very sad and sudden death of Senator
    Jacques Vaisey, Senate held a minute of silence in his memory.
    ?
    9.
    Approval of the Agenda
    The Chair gave notice that in closed session there would be a motion to amend the
    agenda in order to add an important item. The agenda for the open session was approved
    as distributed.
    2.
    Approval of the Minutes of the Open Session of September
    15,
    2003
    The Minutes were approved as distributed.
    Approval of the Minutes of the Open Session of October 6, 2003
    Reference was made to the last sentence of the second paragraph on page 10 of the
    minutes. The option of teaching buy-outs was also mentioned as a possibility and
    suggestion was made that reference should be included in the minutes, and the last
    sentence was amended as follows:
    "With respect to the joint appointment process, departments would not lose half the
    teaching services of a faculty member as faculty members
    could
    be similarly cross-
    appointed from the new Faculty to existing departments/schools
    or funds for teaching
    buy-outs could be provided."
    Following this amendment, the Minutes were approved.
    3.
    Business Arising from the Minutes
    There was no business arising from either set of Minutes.
    4.
    Report of the Chair
    i) ?
    Paper S.03-102 - President's Agenda (For Information)
    The President's Agenda which included a statement of objectives for the coming year
    was received by Senate for information.
    The Chair reported on meetings in Toronto, Ottawa and Montreal with the Association of
    Universities and Colleges (AUCC) regarding issues related to the financing of
    universities, and with various Government representatives with respect to federal policy
    related to the funding of capacity and accessibility with respect to post-secondary
    education across Canada. Meetings were also held in Vancouver with the House of
    Commons Standing Committee on Finance respecting the need for a new federal-
    provincial partnership to address questions of accessibility nationwide and in British
    Columbia particularly. In addition, a meeting with the new Provincial Deputy Minister
    of Advanced Education to discuss questions of financing and Government commitments
    that were not adequately covered in the current budget letters had also taken place. The
    Chair believed that issues of quality and accessibility in universities was now better
    understood at both levels of Government and there appeared to be a more positive
    attitude towards issues surrounding post-secondary education, especially at the federal
    level.

    S.M. 3 November 2003
    Page 3
    S.
    ?
    Question Period
    There were no questions submitted.
    6. ?
    Reports of Committees
    A) ?
    Senate Committee on University Priorities
    i) ?
    Paper S.03-103 - External Review - Latin American Studies Program
    Moved by J. Waterhouse, seconded by M.A. Gillies
    "that Senate concur with the recommendations from the Senate Committee
    on University Priorities concerning the advice to the Latin American
    Studies Program on priority items resulting from the external review as
    outlined in S.03-103"
    J. Brohman, Director, Latin American Studies Program and M. Kenny, Department of
    Sociology and Anthropology were in attendance in order to respond to questions.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    is ?
    ii) ?
    Paper S.03-104 - Graduate Diploma in Bioinformatics
    Prior to the formal motion, Sënate was advised that since the use of the numbers 601,
    602, and 603 for the new courses in MBB would create difficulty with the cross listing of
    in Computing Science, both departments had agreed to change these numbers to 611,
    612, 613.
    Moved by J. Waterhouse, seconded by P. Percival
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of Governors
    the proposal for a Graduate Diploma in Bioinformatics as outlined in S.03-
    104, including new courses MBB
    505, 506,
    611, 612, 613,
    659,
    669, 679"
    B. Brandhorst and M. Smith, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, and A.
    Gupta, School of Computing Science were in attendance in order to respond to questions.
    A question was posed as to how much more work was required for a Master's degree and
    why students would want the diploma versus a master's degree. Senate was advised that
    the diploma was designed as part of the master's program but did not require a thesis and
    would attract students who were already in the industry and wanted to come back for
    updating and some additional advanced education.
    . ?
    A Senator asked how the new courses being introduced for this program would be offered
    without the addition of new faculty. Senate was advised that since the diploma program

    S.M. 3 November 2003
    Page 4
    was a subset of the existing Master's program, many of the new courses were. already
    offered as special topics courses so that resources were already in place. ?
    40.
    Question was called, and a vote taken. ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    iii) ?
    Paper S.03-105 - Final Update Report External Review - Faculty of Business
    Administration (For Information)
    Senate received the final update report from the Faculty of Business Administration and
    received information that the Faculty had successfully fulfilled the recommendations put
    forward by SCUP in September 2001 as a result of the February 1999 external review
    report.
    B) ?
    Senate Policy Committee on Scholarships. Awards and Bursaries
    i) ?
    Paper S.03-106 - Annual Report (For Information)
    J. D'Auria, Senator and Chair of SPCSAB, and C. French, Director, Academic
    Resources, Registrar's Office were in attendance in order to respond to questions.
    It was noted that the value of the Open Scholarships was less than the cost of a credit
    hour and inquiry was made as to when the value was decreased from an exact match.
    Senate was advised that the diliãr value of the Open Scholarship had started tcidecrease
    in 2000/2001 in order to stay within the budget allocated for scholarships. A follow-up
    question asked why it had been decided to adjust the value per credit hour rather than
    adjust the GPA requirement which has been maintained at 3.70. Senate was advised that
    although there was no set policy, the Committee tried to maintain a reasonable GPA and
    tried to balance the funds between the different types of scholarships and bursaries so that
    as many students as possible received something.
    Reference was made to statistics on page 35 and inquiry was made with respect to the
    balance remaining for graduate fellowship allocations in Business Administration.
    Senate was advised that this particular table was produced in Fall of 2002 and was
    intended to show the allocation to departments, not the total number of awards given.
    Most departments award their graduate fellowships during the Spring but Business
    Administration awards their fellowships in the Fall so the table reflected the difference in
    the way graduate enrolment and award disbursement was done in different Faculties.
    A question arose as to whether there was a minimum bursary amount for students in need
    and reference was made to students who had applied for approximately $100041500 and
    only received
    $50.
    Senate was advised that the needs assessment not only takes into
    consideration what the student has requested, it also includes a reasonableness factor used
    to make adjustments up or down and an expectation of a minimum contribution from the
    student. Amounts allocated also depend on what the total assessed need is in any given
    semester and what the budget allocation is in any given year. It was pointed out that
    there was no difference between assessments for international and domestic students.

    S.M. 3 November 2003
    Page 5
    S
    In response to a question as to how SFU compared to other universities in terms of
    scholarships and bursaries, Senate was advised that in terms of Entrance Scholarships
    SFU was competitive with UBC, slightly better than University of Victoria and the
    University of Calgary, but slightly behind some of the schools in Ontario where, over the
    past several years, there have been significant fee increases with a proportion of the
    money directed to scholarships. However the $3000 value of the Entrance Scholarship at
    SFU is better than the average range which is usually between $2000-$2500. The Open
    Scholarship at SFU is one of the best supports for in-course students at any university in
    Canada.
    C)Senate Committee on Agenda and Rules
    i) ?
    Paper S.03-107 - Membership - Senate Committee on University Honours
    Moved by J. Waterhouse, seconded by B. Clayman
    "that the Chair of the Senate Policy Committee on Scholarships, Awards
    and Bursaries be added as an
    ex officio
    member of SCUH with voting
    privileges"
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    D) ?
    Senate Nominating Committee
    ?
    -
    i) ?
    Paper S.03-108 - Elections - Senate Committee Vacancies
    Senate was advised that two nominations had been received resulting in the election by
    acclamation of Derrick Harder to the Undergraduate Student (at-large) position on the
    Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies for term of office to May 31, 2004, and the
    election by acclamation of Trevor Tombe to the Undergraduate Student (at-large)
    position on the Senate Library Committee and the Library Penalties Appeal Committee
    for term of office to May 31, 2005. No nominations were received for the outstanding
    positions on the Senate Appeals Board, the Senate Committee on University Teaching,
    and the Senate Committee on Continuing Studies and those vacancies would be carried
    forward.
    7.
    Other Business
    There was no other business.
    8.
    Information
    The date of the next regularly scheduled meeting is Monday, December 1, 2003.
    Open Session adjourned at
    5:55
    pm and Senate moved into Closed Session following a short
    break.
    . ?
    Alison Watt
    Director, University Secretariat

    Back to top