U
    DRAFT UNTIL APPROVED BY SENATE
    .
    ?
    Minutes of a Meeting of the Senate of Simon Fraser University held on
    Monday, January 8, 2001 at 5:30 pm in Room 3210 WMC
    Open Session
    Present: ?
    Stevenson, Michael, President and Chair
    ?
    Absent:
    Atkins, Stella
    Barrow, Robin
    Budra, Paul
    Bawa,
    Clayman,
    ParveenBruce
    Chan,
    D'Auria,
    Albert
    John
    Collinge, Joan (representing C. Yerbury)
    Dill, Larry
    Cooper, Kait
    England, William
    Copeland, Lynn
    Gerson, Carole
    Davidson, Willie
    Grimmett, Peter
    Delgrande,
    Driver, Jon
    James
    Jones,
    Hold, Angela
    John
    Dunsterville, Valerie
    LaRocque, Linda
    Finley, David
    Mauser, Gary
    Giffen, Ken
    McInnes, Dina
    Gill, Alison
    Ogloff, James
    Hill,
    Gupte,
    RossJaideep
    Runyowa,
    Paterson, David
    Mac
    Jackson, Margaret
    Weldon, Larry
    Klymson, Sarah
    Wessel, Sylvia
    . ?
    Love,
    Marteniuk,
    Livadiotakis,
    ErnieRon
    Georgia
    Yau,
    Wong,
    David
    Milton
    McArthur, James
    McFetridge, Paul
    Miralles-Sanchez, Veronika
    ?
    In attendance:
    Naef, Barbara
    Gutman, Gloria
    Osborne, Judith
    Percival, Paul
    Peters, Joseph
    Pierce, John
    Russell, Robert
    Sanghera, Baiwant
    Smith, Michael
    Steinbach, Christopher
    Stewart, Ryan
    Warsh, Michael
    Waterhouse, John
    Wortis, Michael
    Zaichkowsky, Judith
    Zazkis, Rina
    Heath, Ron, Dean of Student Services and Registrar
    . ?
    Watt, Alison, Director, University Secretariat
    Grant, Bobbie, Recording Secretary

    S.M. 8 January 2001
    Page 2
    Approval of the Agenda
    The Agenda was approved as distributed.
    ?
    2. ?
    Approval of the Minutes of the Open Session of December 4, 2000
    The Minutes were approved as distributed.
    ?
    3. ?
    Business Arising from the Minutes
    i)
    Ad Hoc Senate Committee on Undergraduate Curricula
    In response to concerns raised at the last meeting about the timing of the
    Committee's report, Senate was advised that following consultation with SCAR, the
    timing of the final report was changed to Spring 2002, permitting additional time
    for consultation and input from departments and faculties. Senate was also advised
    that the name of the committee should refer to the plural "curricula" rather than the
    singular "curriculum".
    ii)
    Education 441
    In response to concerns raised at the last meeting about the prerequisite change for
    Education 441, Senate was advised that the change was proposed because of the
    difference in background between PDP students and others in the course. The
    change affected two Diploma programs in Arts but in each case students still had
    flexibility in course selection. In addition, the Faculty of Education indicated to
    SCUS that a new 300-level course which would be open to students in those
    programs would be developed. M. Warsh noted that his concern related to
    whether the appropriate consultation had taken place and J
    .
    Waterhouse noted this
    and said he would relate it to SCUS.
    ?
    4. ?
    Report of the Chair
    i)
    Provincial Grants
    The Chair reported that he and The University Presidents' Council had held
    meetings with Government officials and the opposition caucus regarding financial
    support to universities in the next budget cycle in order to ensure that everyone
    was aware of the budget issues facing the university system.
    ii)
    Fair Use of E-mail
    Reference was made to the recent suspension of the SFU email account of a retired
    faculty member. The Chair indicated that he was sensitive to the concern within
    the university that this was perceived by some as a threat to academic freedom
    although he did not share this view. He assured Senate that the action taken by the
    administration was specific to a lengthy and complicated dispute resulting some
    time ago in a legal case and settlement, the alleged violation of which was now
    again before the courts. Prior to legal resolution, and in the absence of clear policy,
    the administrative action was intended to assure fairness and protection from
    abuse.
    The Chair indicated that he intended to strike a committee or to reactivate a
    committee which had been struck previously to consider revisions to GP 24 Fair
    Use of Information Resources. Senate was assured that it would be kept informed.

    S.M. 8 January 2001
    Page 3
    Is
    5. ?
    Question Period
    Senate was advised that D. Finley had raised two questions concerning
    employment related issues and the Chair stated that he intended to refer them to
    SCAR for discussion about whether questions related to employment histories of
    individuals and employment matters in general were appropriate matters for
    Senate. The Chair briefly informed Senate that one of the questions asked about
    mechanisms available to faculty or staff who wish to bring grievances against
    administrators. The Chair noted that members of the Faculty Association and other
    employee groups have dispute and grievance mechanisms in their negotiated
    agreements that could be used in such situations.
    The second set of questions submitted concerned events related to harassment
    policy and discipline in a specific case which took place over three years ago. The
    University and the employee had reached two mutually acceptable settlement
    agreements and the Chair felt the matter was now closed. In view of his concern
    about bringing questions regarding the terms of employment and the terms of
    agreements between employees and the University to Senate for discussion, he
    would consult with SCAR and provide a brief report at the next meeting of Senate.
    Senate was informed that R. Stewart had submitted a question asking whether or
    not Senate should receive reports and recommendations from SCUP that deal
    substantively with operating budget scenarios. The Chair of SCUP indicated that
    the Committee was mandated to provide annual reports to Senate and if Senate
    . wished, SCUP could present information on the consultation process that occurred
    between SCUP and the President with regard to the operating budget. It was noted
    by R. Stewart that his question was for Senate in general, as he wished to know if
    Senate wanted a role in the preparation of the University's budget. The Chair gave
    his view that there was a clear division of responsibility between Senate and the
    Board of Governors which clearly limited Senates role in the preparation of the
    budget. Senate was provided with background information by one of the former
    chairs of SCUB, P. Percival, on the process followed by SCUB in previous years. He
    noted that SCUB had been consulted on the budget, but that Senate had never had
    a hand in the preparation of the budget and certainly had never been involved in
    the approval of the budget at any stage.
    A question was raised by R. Stewart with respect to the documentation that was
    attached to the Values and Commitment Statement. He asked about the status of
    the Principles and Initiatives, and particular reference was made to Section 3
    relating to building an ethical society. It was pointed out that only the statement on
    Values and Commitments was approved; supporting documentation including
    recommendations and suggestions was not considered by Senate or the Board of
    Governors.
    6. ?
    Reports of Committees
    A) ?
    Senate Nominating Committee
    0
    ?
    1) ?
    Paper S.01-1 - Elections to Senate Committees

    S.M. 8 January 2001
    Page 4
    The following are the results of elections to Senate committees. There were
    insufficient nominations to fill all positions; vacancies will be carried over and
    brought forward to the next meeting of Senate.
    Senate Committee on Continuing Studies (SCCS)
    One Student Senator for term of office to May 31, 2002.
    No nominations received
    One Graduate Student (at-large) for term of office to May 31, 2001.
    Elected by acclamation:
    ?
    James McArthur
    Senate Committee on Disciplinar
    y
    Appeals (SCODA)
    One Student (at-large) to replace C. Percival for term of office to May 31, 2001.
    ?
    Elected by acclamation:
    ?
    Chris Steinbach
    Senate Committee on Agenda and Rules (SCAR)
    One Student Senator to replace S.Y. To for term of office to May 31, 2001.
    Elected by acclamation:
    ?
    Chris Steinbach
    B) ?
    Senate Committee on University Priorities
    i) ?
    Paper S.01-2 - External Review - Gerontology Programs and Research
    Centre
    J .
    Waterhouse advised Senate that since consideration of this matter by SCUP,
    Gerontology has raised concerns about recommendation one and an amended
    motion follows:
    Moved by J
    .
    Waterhouse, seconded by B. Clayman
    "that Senate concurs with recommendations 2, 3, and 4 from the
    Senate Committee on University Priorities concerning advice to the
    Gerontology Program and Research Centre on priority items
    resulting from the external review, as outlined in S.01-2, and that
    recommendation 1 be referred back to SCUP for further
    consideration"
    G. Gutman, Director of the Gerontology Program, was in attendance in order to
    respond to questions.
    In response to an inquiry, G. Gutman provided Senate with brief background
    information on the success of the Gerontology program both at the undergraduate
    and graduate level. She also stated, in response to an inquiry questioning the cost
    and usefulness of external reviews, that the unit could probably have identified the
    issues raised by the reviewers without the external review report. Concern was
    expressed about units initiating only those recommendations of a review which
    particularly interested them. Senate was advised that SCUP was concerned about
    the effectiveness of the external reviews and was reviewing the current process.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED

    S.M. 8 January 2001
    Page 5
    C)
    ?
    Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies
    i)
    ?
    Paper S.01-3 - Undergraduate Curriculum Revisions - Faculty of Applied
    Sciences
    (For Information)
    Senate was advised that item 2 (Change in BC 12 Admission Requirements - 5
    course admission model) under the School of Kinesiology was on the agenda in
    error and should be withdrawn. It would come back to Senate in a different format.
    Senate received information that the Senate Undergraduate Studies Committee,
    acting under delegated authority, approved the following curriculum revisions in
    the Faculty of Applied Sciences:
    a)
    School of Kinesiology
    - ?
    New courses: KIN 304, 342, 484, 446
    Revisions to the Major Program - lower and upper division
    requirements and electives
    - ?
    Addition of courses to the Post Baccalaureate Diploma
    -
    ?
    Revisions to the Certificate in Applied Human Nutrition
    - ?
    Revisions to the Certificate in Health and Fitness Studies
    - ?
    Change of course title: KIN 201
    - ?
    Change of course description: KIN 326, 381, 420, 421, 422
    -
    ?
    Change of course title and description: KIN 402, 445
    S
    -
    Change of course credit: KIN 418
    Change of course prerequisites: KIN 105, 201, 205, 301, 303, 305, 306,
    310, 311, 325, 326, 343, 375, 381, 382, 383, 402, 415, 430, 431, 444, 461,
    486, 497, 498
    - ?
    Deletion of KIN 203
    - ?
    Deletion of human movement sciences concentration
    b)
    School of Computing Science
    - Change of prerequisite grade requirement
    C)
    ?
    School of Resource and Environmental Management -
    - Change of prerequisite: REM 311, 412
    d)
    ?
    School of Engineering Science
    - Change of course order in Engineering Physics
    - Change of prerequisite: ENSC 406
    Paper S.01-4 - Undergraduate Curriculum Revisions - Faculty of Science
    (For Information)
    Senate received information that the Senate Undergraduate Studies Committee,
    acting under delegated authority, approved the following revisions in the Faculty
    of Science - Department of Biological Sciences:
    - ?
    New Special Topics courses: BISC 474, 475

    S.M. 8 January 2001
    Page 6
    .
    iii) ?
    Paper S.01-5 - Deletion of courses not offered /Temporarily Withdrawn
    Courses (For Information)
    Senate regulation states that any courses not offered within a six semester period be
    deleted from the Calendar unless adequate justification for retaining the course is
    presented, with SCUS charged with reviewing those courses under this ruling.
    Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies,
    acting under delegated authority, approved the deletion of the following courses:
    BISC 415, CHEM 411, CHIN 102, EASC 490, EDPR 361, EDUC 439, CS 240, CS 304,
    CS 399, CS 400, CS 498, CS 499, HIST 340, KIN 460, SA 467.
    Senate regulation also provides an option for departments to identify courses that
    have not been offered as 'temporarily withdrawn' (mothballed) if they do not wish
    to delete the course. Senate received information that the Senate Committee on
    Undergraduate Studies, acting under delegated authority, identified the following
    courses under this provision as being temporarily withdrawn: ARCH 379, BUEC
    495, BUS 434, BUS 439, CMPT 411, CRIM 342, CRIM 411, CRIM 430, CRIM 440,
    EASC 405, ECON 252, EDPR 407, GERM 300, CS 101, HIST 230, HIST 385, HIST
    412, HIST 451, PHIL 325, SA 357.
    D) ?
    Senate Graduate Studies Committee
    i)
    ?
    Paper S.01-6 - Graduate Curriculum Revisions - Faculty of Applied Sciences
    Moved by J
    .
    Driver, seconded by B. Clayman
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors the deletion of the Joint MRM/MBA degree program"
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    Senate received information that the Senate Graduate Studies Committee, acting
    under delegated authority, approved the following changes:
    a)
    School of Engineering Science
    - New course: ENSC 835
    - Revised description of Master's and PhD programs
    - Change of description: ENSC 801, 802
    - Change of title, description and prerequisites: ENSC 810, 815
    - General revision of prerequisites
    - Change of description, ENSC 820, addition of special instructions
    b)
    School of Kinesiology
    - Change of title, description, prerequisite: KIN 840
    c)
    School of Resource and Environmental Management
    - Changes to Master's and PhD requirements
    - Change of title and description: REM 601, 610, 650, 651, 646

    S.M. 8 January 2001
    Page 7
    - Change of title, description and prerequisites: REM 646, 655
    - Deletion of REM 634
    ii) ?
    Paper S.01-7
    -
    Graduate Curriculum Revisions - Faculty of Arts
    (For Information)
    Senate received information that the Senate Graduate Studies Committee, acting
    under delegated authority, approved the following changes:
    a) Department of Economics
    - Replacement of BUEC 815 with ECON 815; BUEC 817 with ECON 817, and
    BUEC 818 with ECON 818. ECON 315/817/818 to be cross-listed with
    similarly numbered courses in Business Administration
    b)
    Department of Philosophy
    - New course: PHIL 899
    - Deletion of all 700-level courses
    - PHIL 800, 801, 810, 811, 820, 821, 830, 840, 850, 860, 870, 871, 880 deleted and
    re-numbered to PHIL 802, 803, 804, 805, 806, 812, 813, 814, 815, 822, 823, 824,
    825, 826, 852, 853, 854, 855
    - Change in MA degree requirements
    - Revision of the Calendar description for SFU-UBC co-operation on
    Philosophy graduate programs
    - Change in course number and title: PHIL 805 to 861, PHIL 815 to 862, PHIL
    825 to 863, PHIL 845 to 864, PHIL 855 to 865
    c)
    Department of Political Science
    - New course: POL 802
    - Changes to areas of study
    - Changes to MA degree requirements
    - Changes to the PhD program re degree requirements, course work and
    comprehensive examinations section
    - Change of course title and prerequisite: POL 801
    - Deletion of calendar description for POL 837
    d)
    Department of Psychology
    - Removal of the GRE Advanced Subject Test as a requirement for Application
    to the graduate program
    e) Master of Publishing
    - Change of title and description: PUB 607
    iii) ?
    Paper S.01-8 - Graduate Curriculum Revisions -
    Administration
    (For Information)
    Senate received information that the Senate Graduate Studies Committee, acting
    under delegated authority, approved the following changes:
    0

    S.M. 8 January 2001
    Page 8
    - Change of admission requirements for the Graduate Diploma in Business
    Administration
    - New course: BUS 560
    - Deletion of BUEC 819, BUEC 820, BUEC 823
    - Replacement of BUEC 815, 187, 818 with BUS 815, 817, 818. BUS 815/817/818 to
    be cross-listed with similarly numbered courses in Economics.
    iv)
    ?
    Paper S.01-9 - Graduate Curriculum Revisions - Faculty of Education
    (For Information)
    Senate received information that the Senate Graduate Studies Committee, acting
    under delegated authority, approved the following changes:
    - New course: EDUC 853
    - Change of title: EDUC 805
    - Change of prerequisites: EDUC 826, 860, 946, 971
    - Change of description and credit hour: EDUC 862
    - Change of description: EDUC 877
    - Change in calendar entry for an Individual Program in Education
    V)
    ?
    Paper S.01-10 - Graduate Curriculum Revisions - Faculty of Science
    (For Information)
    Senate received information that the Senate Graduate Studies Committee, acting
    under delegated authority, approved the following changes:
    0
    a)
    Department of Earth Sciences
    - New courses: EASC 603, 606, 607, 608
    b)
    Department of Mathematics and Statistics
    - Re-labeling the 900-level courses used in the Applied and Computational
    Mathematics program from MATH to APMA
    E) ?
    Senate Committee on Agenda and Rules
    i) ?
    Paper S.01-11 - Membership - Ad Hoc Senate Committee to Review and
    Develop the Undergraduate Curricula
    (For Information)
    Senate received information that the Senate Committee on Agenda and Rules
    approved the following membership for the Ad Hoc Senate Committee to Review
    and Develop the Undergraduate Curricula: Dennis Krebs (Chair); Michael Wortis
    (Science); Tina Loo (History); Kieran Egan (Education); Joseph Peters (Applied
    Sciences); Maureen Fizzell (Business); Sue Roppel (Researcher). The student
    member of the committee had not yet been determined.
    7. ?
    Other Business
    Inquiry was raised with regard to the process used by the Student Society to recruit
    advertise
    students for
    widely
    committees.
    enough. Senate
    Concern
    was
    was
    assured
    expressed
    that the
    that
    Student
    SFSS may
    Society
    not recruit
    took itsor
    0

    S.M. 8 January 2001
    Page 9
    responsibility to find qualified candidates for committee positions very seriously.
    . Each week a notice was posted in the classified section of The Peak listing current
    committee vacancies and e-mail announcements were sent fairly widely to various
    departmental student unions, groups, and other e-mail lists.
    8. ?
    Information
    The next regularly scheduled meeting of Senate is Monday, February 5th and will
    take place at the Centre for Dialogue downtown.
    Open session adjourned at 6:15 pm. Following a brief recess, Senate moved into Closed
    Session.
    Alison Watt
    Director, University Secretariat
    n

    Back to top