.
    DRAFT UNTIL APPROVED BY SENATE
    Minutes of a meeting of the Senate of Simon Fraser University held on
    Monday, April 3, 2000 at 5:30 pm in Room 3210
    West Mall Centre
    Open Session
    Present:
    Blaney, Jack, President and Chair
    Absent: Chan, Albert
    Al-Natour, Sameh
    Chuah, Kuan
    Atkins, Stella
    D'Auria, John
    Benezra, Michael
    Deigrande, James
    Boland, Larry
    Dunsterville, Valerie
    Budra, Paul
    Emerson, Joseph
    Clayman, Bruce
    Fletcher, James
    Copeland, Lynn
    Heaney, John
    Davidson, Willie
    Reader, Jason
    Driver, Jon
    Sanghera, Baiwant
    England, William
    Warsh, Michael
    Finley, David
    Waterhouse, John
    Gillies, Mary Ann
    Wessel, Silvia
    Harris, Richard
    Wong, Milton
    Hyslop-Margison, Emery
    Jones, John
    Kanevsky, Lannie
    Kirczenow, George
    In attendance:
    Marteniuk, Ron
    Conn, Melanie
    Mathewes, Rolf
    Heath, Nick
    Mauser, Gary
    Roseland, Mark
    McArthur, James
    McBride, Stephen
    McFetridge, Paul
    McInnes, Dina
    Meredith, Lindsay (representing J
    .
    Waterhouse)
    Munro, Jock
    Naef, Barbara
    Niwinska, Tina
    Ogloff, James
    Osborne, Judith
    Paterson, David
    Peters, Joseph
    Peterson, Louis
    Pierce, John
    Russell, Robert
    Smith, Michael
    Steinbach, Christopher
    Thompson, Janny (representing R. Barrow)
    To, Shek Yan
    Wortis, Michael
    Yerbury, Cohn
    Zazkis, Rina
    Watt, Alison, Director, University Secretariat
    r
    Grant, Bobbie, Recording Secretary

    S.M. 3 April 2000
    Page 2
    Prior to the start of the meeting the Chair introduced and welcomed to Senate
    President-designate Michael Stevenson. Dr. Stevenson made a brief presentation to
    Senate and responded to questions from Senators.
    The Meeting came to order at 5:55 pm
    Newly elected Student Senator, W. England was welcomed to Senate by the Chair.
    1.
    Approval of the Agenda
    The Agenda was approved as distributed.
    2.
    Approval of the Minutes of the Open Session of March 6, 2000
    The Minutes were approved as distributed.
    3.
    Business Arising from the Minutes
    There was no business arising from the Minutes.
    4.
    Report of the Chair
    i)
    Paper S.00-34 - Chair's response to a request to consider Hellenic Studies
    issues
    The Chair reported that both the University and the Canadian Hellenic Congress
    - the parties officially involved in the Hellenic Chair - were satisfied with the
    terms of reference and with the appointment of the Chair. In addition to the
    documentation before Senate, the Chair advised that copies of correspondence
    between the University and the Canadian Hellenic Congress were available to
    interested Senators.
    While there was no objection to SCAR's decision with respect to motion 2,
    concern was expressed about the decision with regard to motion 1 and the
    following Notice of Motion was suggested: "that motion 1 on S.00-34 be placed
    on the next Senate meeting for discussion and Tasos Kazepides, Professor
    Emeritus, be invited to act as a resource person". It was pointed out that SCAR
    had already determined that motion 1 was not a matter of Senate concern and
    suggestion was made that the motion be reworded.
    Notice of motion moved by E. Hyslop-Margison, seconded by G. Kirczenow
    "that Tasos Kazepides be invited as a resource person to speak on
    the Hellenic Studies Chair at the next meeting of Senate"
    Senate was advised that the intent of the motion was to provide opportunity for
    T. Kazepides to present his side of the issue to Senate with particular reference to
    the suggestion that the initial terms of reference for the Hellenic Studies Chair be
    restored.

    S.M. 3 April 2000
    Page 3
    . Brief discussion ensued with respect to procedural issues. Senate was advised
    that SCAR would consider the notice of motion and report back to Senate at the
    next meeting.
    ii)
    The Chair was pleased to report that for the first time in approximately
    nine years the budget provided increased funding for the core operating budget
    in addition to funds for more student spaces. The Government has clearly
    demonstrated that investment in post-secondary education was critical and has
    made a commitment to address the issue of the funding gap in revenue per
    student over the next number of years.
    iii)
    The Chair reported that two very positive articles had appeared in the
    Vancouver Sun in which SFU was identified as taking a proactive role in regard
    to the problem of faculty renewal and retention which was facing universities
    across Canada. Reference was made to the report of the Task Force on Faculty
    Renewal and Retention, and Senate was advised that all of the recommendations
    of the Task Force had either been implemented or were in the process of being
    implemented.
    iv)
    Referring to the discussion at the last meeting of Senate about the
    commercialization of university research, the Chair reported on meetings with
    representatives of the Federal Government and advised Senate that there would
    likely be no comment or report from the Government until at least June
    0
    5.
    Reports of Committees
    a)
    Senate Committee on Academic Planning/Senate Committee on
    Continuing Studies
    i)
    Paper S.00-35 - Non-Credit Certificate Program: Professional Program in
    Community Economic Development
    Moved by J
    .
    Munro, seconded by S. McBride
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors, as set forth in S.00-35, the proposal for a Non-Credit
    Certificate Program: Professional program in Community Economic
    Development leading to a Non-Credit Certificate
    M. Roseland, Director of the Community Economic Development Centre, and M.
    Conn, Community Economic Development Associate were in attendance in
    order to respond to questions.
    In response to a question about the effect of this program on small communities
    within BC, Senate was advised that is designed for professionals in the economic
    development area many of whom would be working in small communities. The
    .
    program was not designed for international delivery.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED

    S.M. 3 April 2000
    Page 4
    b)
    Senate Committee on Academic Planning/Senate Committee on
    is
    Undergraduate Studies
    i)
    Paper S.00-36
    - Admission - BC Grade XI Upgrading
    Moved by J
    .
    Munro, seconded by C. Steinbach
    "that Senate approve, as set forth in S.00-36, that upgrades of BC
    Grade XII marks may be made in accordance with Ministry of
    Education policies, except that the final mark in a provincially-
    examinable course may not be increased by taking a college course
    deemed to be its equivalent"
    N. Heath, Director of Admissions, was in attendance in order to respond to
    questions on this item and the following three items.
    Concern was expressed that the motion implied that a college course was of less
    value than a normal Grade XII course. It was noted that Adult Basic Education
    courses were not provincially examinable. Senate was advised that the motion
    before Senate, as well as the motion on Paper S.00-37, was a result of a
    fundamental change last year in the acceptance of courses by the two Ministries
    that serve the K-12 and post-secondary systems. In order to provide more
    flexibility, courses taken either at the college level for work towards high school
    graduate or courses taken at the high school level would be recognized for work
    towards the new BC Adult Graduation Diploma.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    ii)
    Paper S.00-37 - Admission - BC Adult Graduation Diploma
    Moved by J
    .
    Munro, seconded by J
    .
    Osborne
    "that Graduates of the BC Adult Graduation Diploma who are at
    least 19 years of age and who have completed those courses
    specified for admission in the regular BC (secondary school)
    Graduation Diploma or equivalent courses offered through post-
    secondary institutions, except that a Grade 11 language course is
    not required, be eligible for admission in the high school admission
    category. The four Grade 12 or equivalent courses must be from
    different disciplines. A minimum average of 67% (C+) based on
    English 12 and three other academic Grade 12 courses or their
    equivalents is required. This policy is to be effective for three
    years, from May 2000 to September 2003, with a review to occur in
    Fall 2001"
    In response to an inquiry as to what admission category these students would
    fall under, Senate was advised that they were counted in with the BC High

    .
    S.M. 3 April 2000
    Page 5
    School students and, in the past, students from the previous credential - Adult
    Basic Education Provincial Diploma - only amounted to approximately twelve
    per year.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    iii)
    Paper S.00-38 - Admission - BC Secondary School Students taking AP or
    TB exams
    Moved by J
    .
    Munro, seconded by J
    .
    Osborne
    "that Senate approve, as set forth in S.00-38, that Advanced
    Placement or International Baccalaureate final course grades may
    be translated for B.C. secondary school graduates to percentage
    marks, in accordance with the following table, and used in the
    admission average in lieu of other BC Grade XII courses:
    AP Exam Grade lB Exam Grade
    Eauivalent BC% mark
    5
    7
    96
    6
    90
    4
    5
    86
    3
    80
    4
    76
    2
    3
    70"
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    C)
    Senate Appeals Board
    i)
    Paper S.00-39 - Annual Report
    The Annual Report of the Senate Appeals Board was received by Senate for
    information.
    d)
    Committee to Review University
    Admission
    i)
    Paper S.00-40 - Annual Report
    C. French, Director, Student Academic Resources was in attendance in order to
    respond to questions. The Annual Report of the Committee to Review
    University Admission was received by Senate for information.
    e)
    Senate Committee on Continuing Studies
    i)
    Paper S.00-41 - Annual Report
    C. Yerbury, Dean of Continuing Studies was in attendance in order to respond to
    questions.
    0

    S.M. 3 April 2000
    Page 6
    Concern was expressed about the inaccuracy of the statistics on pages 17 and 18
    and suggestion was made that in future, either this information not be included
    or more accurate information be obtained from departments.
    6.
    Other Business
    i)
    Paper S.00-42 - Change of date - September Senate Meeting
    Senate received information that SCAR had considered and approved a request
    that the September Senate meeting be changed from Monday, September 11, 2000
    to Monday, September 18, 2000 in order to accommodate approval of graduands
    for the October Convocation ceremony.
    ii)
    In response to an inquiry, Senate was advised that the Senate Library
    Committee, after careful consideration, decided it was not appropriate to issue
    free library cards to high school students, including lB students.
    7.
    Information
    Date of the next regularly scheduled meeting - Monday, May 15, 2000.
    Open Session adjourned at 6:25 pm; Senate moved directly into Closed Session.
    Alison Watt
    Director, University Secretariat
    9

    Back to top