DRAFT UNTIL APPROVED BY SENATE
    .
    ?
    Minutes of a meeting of the Senate of Simon Fraser University
    held on
    Monday, January 5, 1998 at 7:00 pm in Room 3210 WMC
    Open Session
    Present: ?
    Blaney, Jack, President
    pro tern
    and Chair
    Barrow, Robin ?
    Absent:
    Baert, Jessica
    Bawa, Parveen
    Blazenko, George
    Beattie, Suzan
    Coleman, Peter
    Berggren, J. Len
    Dunsterville, Valerie
    Boland, Larry
    Giffen, Ken
    Bowman, Marilyn
    Hassan, Nany
    Chan, Albert
    Marteniuk, Ron
    Clayman, Bruce
    Morris, Joy
    Cleveland, William
    Nip, Harry
    D'Auria, John
    Osborne, Judith
    Dobb, Ted
    Parmar, Neelam
    Emmott, Alan
    Sanghera, Balwant
    Etherington, Lois
    Segal, Joseph
    Gagan, David
    Warsh, Michael
    Gillies, Mary Ann
    Whitbread, Katherine
    Jones, Cohn
    Wickstrom, Norman
    Jones, John
    Kanevsky, Lannie
    Kirczenow, George
    Lewis, Brian ?
    In attendance:
    Mathewes, Rolf
    Hansen, Joey
    Mauser, Gary
    Heath, Nick
    McInnes, Dina
    Munro, J.M.
    Naef, Barbara
    Ogloff, James
    Overington, Jennifer
    Percival, Paul
    Peterson, Louis
    Pierce, John
    Reed, Clyde
    Russell, Robert
    Selman, Mark
    Tam, Lawrence
    Waterhouse, John
    Winne, Phil
    Wong, Tim
    Wortis, Michael
    Yagi, Ian
    Watt, Alison, Director, Secretariat Services
    Grant, Bobbie, Recording Secretary

    S.M. 05/01/98
    Page 2
    ?
    1. ?
    Approval of the Agenda
    The Agenda was approved as distributed.
    ?
    2. ?
    Approval of the Minutes of the Open Session of December 1, 1997
    The Minutes were approved as distributed.
    Secretary's Note: The references to SGSC on pages 4 and 5 with respect to
    Senate papers S.97-86 and S.97-87 should be changed to SCUS.
    ?
    4. ?
    Report of the Chair
    There was no report from the Chair.
    ?
    3. ?
    Business Arising from the Minutes
    i)
    ?
    S.98-1 - Ad Hoc Committee to Review the Role of Senate regardin
    I Jnivcrcifv PnIirie - Fnr
    Infnrmtinn
    The Chair reported that SCAR had revised the membership and terms of
    reference to reflect the wishes of Senate as expressed at the last meeting. The
    membership of the Committee was reported to Senate as follows:
    Two Faculty Senators, selected by SCAR: Marilyn Bowman and Michael Wortis
    One Student Senator, selected by SCAR: Neelam Parmar
    One Dean, selected by the Deans: Robin Barrow
    One Vice-President, selected by the Vice-Presidents: David Gagan
    Director, Secretariat Services: Alison Watt
    Secretary of Senate (Chair): Ron Heath
    It is hoped that the Committee will report back to SCAR by the April meeting.
    ?
    5. ?
    Reports of Committees
    a)
    Senate Nominating Committee
    i) ?
    Paper S.98-2 - Elections
    Senate was advised that no nominations were received for the positions noted on
    Senate paper S.98-2 and the vacancies will be carried forward.
    b)
    Senate Committee on Academic Planning/Senate Committee on
    Undergraduate Studies
    i)
    ?
    Paper S.98-3 - Grade 12 courses for University admission
    Moved by D. Gagan, seconded by P. Bawa
    "that Senate approve, as set forth in S.98-3, the following motions:
    1. Information Technology 12 shall not be included in the list of
    acceptable courses which may count in the student's average for
    admission to Simon Fraser University. Students who complete

    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    .
    S.M. 05/01/98
    Page 3
    .
    INT 12 in 97/98 only may count this course towards general
    admission, at the discretion of the Director of Admissions.
    2. Effective immediately, Advanced Placement Computer Science
    12 A or AB (APCSC 12A or APSC 12) shall be added to the list
    of acceptable non-science courses, provided that the candidate
    takes the AP examination and scores a grade of 3 or better"
    Nick Heath, Director of Admissions, was in attendance in order to respond to
    questions.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    ii)
    ?
    Paper S.98-4 - Faculty of Applied Sciences
    - Minor Program in Computer and Electronics Design
    Moved by D. Gagan, seconded by P. Bawa
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors as set forth in S.984, the proposed Minor Program in
    Computer and Electronics Design"
    Moved by D. Gagan, seconded by
    J.
    Pierce
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors, as set forth in S.98-5, the deletion of the Latin American
    Studies Major Program"
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    Senate received information that SCUS, acting under delegated authority
    approved minor curriculum revisions to existing programs/joint programs in Latin
    American Studies.
    iv)
    ?
    Paper S.98-6 - Faculty of Education
    - Deletion of Joint Minor in French and Education
    - Undergraduate Curriculum Revisions (For Information)
    0

    S.M. 05/01/98
    Page 4
    Moved by D. Gagan, seconded by R. Barrow
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors as set forth in 5.98-6, the deletion of the Joint Minor in
    French and Education"
    Question was called, and a vote taken. ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    Senate received information that SCUS, acting under delegated authority,
    approved minor curriculum revisions to an existing program and course within the
    Faculty of Education.
    Paper S.98-7 - Deletion of courses not offered
    Senate regulation provides that any courses not offered within a six semester
    period be deleted from the Calendar unless adequate justification for retaining
    the course is presented. Senate received information that SCUS, acting under
    delegated authority, approved the deletion of the following courses under this
    regulation: CMNS 401, KIN 280, FREN 298, LING 440, POL 412, PSYC 304,
    EDUC 280, MATH 426.
    c)
    ?
    Senate Committee on Academic Plan nin
    g
    JSenate Graduate Studies
    Committee
    i) ?
    Paper S.98-8 - Graduate Diploma Programs and resulting changes to
    Graduate Regulation 1.3.1 and new Graduate Regulations 1.3.2 and 1.7.2.
    Moved by D. Gagan, seconded by B. Clayman
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors, the establishment of Graduate Diploma Programs and
    the resulting changes to Regulation 1.3.1, the new Regulation 1.3.2
    and the new Regulation 1.7.2 as set forth in S.98-8"
    In response to an inquiry as to why this proposed diploma was necessary when
    Post Baccalaureate Diplomas were available, Senate was advised that the
    Graduate Diploma was primarily a graduate level offering while PBD's were
    almost always completely comprised of undergraduate courses.
    Reference was made to the possibility of charging higher than standard fees for
    graduate diploma programs. Senate was advised that a higher than standard fee
    may be charged depending on the program and the students' willingness to pay.
    The current Executive MBA program was noted as an example of such a program.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    1]

    S.M. 05/01/98
    Page 5
    S
    ?
    ions
    Senate received information that the SGSC, acting under delegated authority,
    approved minor curriculum revisions to existing graduate courses in the Faculty of
    Education.
    iii)
    ?
    Paper 5.98-10 - Molecular Biology and Biochemistry Program - Change of
    administrative authority
    Moved by D. Gagan, seconded by B. Clayman
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors, as set forth in S.98-10, that the full administrative
    authority for the Graduate Program in Molecular Biology and
    Biochemistry (MBB) be transferred to the Biochemistry Program
    from the Departments of Chemistry and Biological Sciences. For
    the purpose of assignment of Teaching Assistantships, graduate
    students qualified to teach in, but not registered in, a departmental
    program and supervised by a member of the department will be
    given preference over external graduate students, undergraduate
    students, and candidates for appointments as External Teaching
    Assistants"
    .
    ?
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    Senate received information that the SGSC, acting under delegated authority,
    approved a change to the Calendar entry for the MBB program to reflect the
    administrative authority as approved by the above motion.
    iv) ?
    Pa p er S.98-11 - Facult
    y
    of Science - Graduate Curriculum Revisions (F
    Senate received information that the SGSC, acting under delegated authority,
    approved minor curriculum revisions to existing graduate courses in the Faculty of
    Science in Biological Sciences, Mathematics & Statistics, Marine Science and
    Earth Sciences.
    At this point of the meeting, N. Heath replaced A. Watt as Secretary of Senate.
    d) ?
    Senate Committee on Agenda and Rules
    i) ?
    Paper S.98-12 - Harassment Policy - Proposed Revision - For Discussion
    J. Munro, Chair, Harassment Policy Revision Task Force, together with
    J.
    Hansen
    and A. Watt, members of the Task Force were in attendance in order to respond
    to questions. The other member of the Task Force, K. Heinrich, was out of town
    and unable to attend the meeting. R. Coe, President of the Faculty Association
    was also in attendance as a resource person.

    S.M. 05/01/98
    Page 6
    Prior to the start of the meeting, the following materials relating to this issue were
    distributed to members of Senate: Letter to Senate dated 2 Jan 1998 from Rick is
    Coe, President, Faculty Association; and a letter to Senate dated 24 Dec 1997
    from the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association.
    In order to allow less formal and more open discussion, the following motion was
    put forward.
    Moved by L. Boland, seconded by W. Cleveland
    "that this item be discussed as if we are in Committee of the Whole"
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    The Chair reminded Senators that while this item is open for discussion of all
    issues related to this policy, Senate has an advisory role only and will not approve
    the document as policy. Senate may make motions representing views that they
    wish conveyed to the Board of Governors or motions recommending
    amendments but specific amendments will not be entered into. The substance
    of Senate's debate, together with any motions passed, will then be forwarded to
    the Board of Governors, and all discussion and motions, if any, will be given
    consideration by the Task Force prior to their final submission to the Board of
    Governors.
    A full discussion of various elements of the draft Harassment Policy took place.
    Moved by M. Wortis, seconded by M.A. Gillies
    "It is the sense of Senate that the Harassment Policy should include
    a provision stating that the Human Rights Coordinator shall prepare
    each year a public document containing a summary (including
    findings and reasoning) of all completed cases which will have
    reached the investigative stage with names and other identifiers
    deleted wherever necessary so as to be consistent with the practices
    of the B.C. Human Rights Commission"
    Question was called, and a vote taken
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    Moved by M. Words, seconded by L. Etherington
    That the term "Human Rights" be replaced by "Harassment
    Prevention" at appropriate points throughout the draft policy.
    Question was called, and a vote taken
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    The following additional comments or suggestions were made by one or more
    members of Senate.
    1. ?
    Add definitions of "faculty" and "student" to clarify who is eligible to be
    appointed to the Board or to search committees.

    S.M. 05/01/98
    Page 7
    2.
    It was suggested that the Policy be written to anticipate a possible change in
    the persons responsible for non-academic student misconduct matters
    under existing policy (Ti 0.03).
    3.
    A potential conflict was noted in that the Policy appeared to authorize two
    responsible officers to make a decision on the investigator's report.
    4.
    Senators recommended changing frivolous, vexatious or malicious
    complaints of harassment may be grounds for discipline" to stronger
    language.
    5.
    It was suggested that the Policy should specify more clearly the criteria for
    selection of the Human Rights Co-ordinator, the Chair and members of the
    Human Rights Policy Board, members of search committees, and the Vice
    President, Academic's choice of designate.
    6.
    The Policy should avoid an obvious concentration of power by either having
    the search committees chaired by someone other than the Vice President,
    Academic, or having the Vice President, Academic make a
    recommendation for appointment to the President.
    7.
    It was suggested that the time limit (12 months) for the initial filing of a
    • ?
    complaint was too long.
    8.
    The investigator's lack of power to subpoena, compel participation, or take
    evidence under oath and the lack of opportunity for cross examination was
    of concern.
    9.
    It was suggested that information about the cost of administering the Policy,
    including the costs of investigations and redress, should be a part of the
    annual report.
    10.
    The Policy does not appear to be congruent with the "United Nations
    Universal Declaration of Human Rights".
    11.
    Preference was expressed for an arbitration process as part of the Harassment
    Policy, rather than the investigation and administrative decision process.
    12.
    There was discussion on various aspects of the University's right to take the
    role of the complainant.
    13.
    The issue of whether the Human Rights Commission would recognize the
    University's policy and procedures was raised.
    14.
    A respondent's prior criminal record, if any, could be accessible and be used
    in determining the severity of the penalty.
    0

    5 ? -.
    S.M. 05/01/98
    Page
    8
    15.
    When the responsible officer takes the role of the complainant and has
    access to legal advice, the respondent may be at a disadvantage.
    16. The publication of the names of those found to have violated the Policy,
    similar to the publication of penalties by the B.C. College of Teachers, was
    suggested.
    17.
    It was suggested that an annual report would delay the publication of
    decisions and so detract from the educational goals of the Policy.
    On report from the Chair that there were no further speakers, and that two
    motions had been approved, the committee of the whole was dissolved.
    The Chair expressed thanks to Senate and to the Faculty Association for the high
    quality of criticism and helpful and constructive comments over the past four
    months with respect to revisions to the harassment policy.
    The Chair expressed thanks and appreciation to the members of the Task Force
    and, on behalf of Senate and the University, the Chair commended them for
    completing a task that he hoped will serve the University well in future.
    A. Watt resumed her role as Secretary of Senate.
    6.
    Other Business
    There was no other business.
    7.
    Information
    The next regularly scheduled meeting of Senate will take place on Monday,
    February 2, 1998.
    The Open Session adjourned at
    9:15
    pm and moved directly into Closed Session.
    Alison Watt
    Director, Secretariat Services
    S

    Back to top