*
    /?mended 6&
    fk2I-
    3nuarj,
    1.qq
    DRAFT UNTIL APPROVED BY SENATE
    MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE SENATE OF SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY HELD
    ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 4, 1995 IN ROOM 3210 WMX, 7:00 P.M.
    OPEN SESSION
    Present:
    ?
    Stubbs, j.O., Chair
    Alderson, E.
    ?
    Absent: ?
    Barrow, R.
    Arnason, K.
    ?
    Blazenko, C.
    Beattie, S.
    ?
    Chan, K.
    Blaney, J
    .
    ?
    Dahl, V.
    Boland, L. ?
    Dean, C.
    Bullock, D. ?
    Dhir, R.
    Ciconte, R. ?
    Eaton, C.
    D'Auria, J
    .
    ?
    Lewis, B.
    Dobb, T.
    ?
    Luk, W.S.
    Dunsterville, V. ?
    McInnes, D.
    Etherington, L: ?
    - ? Sanghera, B.
    Gagan, D.
    ?
    Segal, J.
    Heinrich, K.
    ?
    Warsh, M.
    Howlett, M.
    Jahn, R.
    Jones, C.H.W.
    Karabotsos, F.
    Keto, D.
    LeMare, L.
    ?
    In attendance:
    Lord, T. ?
    Gobas, F.
    W
    ?
    Marteniuk, R. ?
    Kimball, M.
    Mathewes, R.
    ?
    Roberts, M.
    Mauser, C.
    ?
    Walls, J.
    McAskiII, I.
    Morrison, T.
    Naef, B.
    Osborne, J.
    Percival, P.
    Peterson, L.
    Pierce, J.
    Rawicz, A.
    Reed, C.
    Ross, D.
    Scharfe, E.
    Shapiro, S.
    Stewart, M.L.
    Underhill, 0.
    Whitbread, K.
    Wickstrom, N.
    Wideen, M.
    Winne, P.
    Wrenn, I'. (representing B. Clayman)
    Heath, R., Secretary
    Grant, B., Recording Secretary

    *
    S.M. 04112/95
    Page
    The Chair welcomed new Senator K. Whitbread, Faculty of Arts, to the
    Approval
    meeting. ?
    of the Agenda
    The Agenda was approved as distributed.
    ?
    2. ?
    Approval of the Minutes of the O
    p
    en Session of November 6, 1995
    The Minutes were approved as distributed.
    ?
    3. ?
    Business Arising from the Minutes
    Referring to the request on page 3 for vector information on the new course
    CMNS 200, Senate was advised that this information will be reported at the
    next meeting of Senate.
    ?
    4. ?
    Report of the Chair
    i)
    Senate was advised that in light of the uncertainty of the financial
    situation, particularly since the University is not expected to have any real
    clarity about the budget situation for some period of time, a hiring freeze has
    been issued for all University appointments. Although he would not
    normally reference the recent budget cuts to post-secondary education in
    Ontario, the Chair pointed out that the B.C. Government is looking closely at
    what is happening in that Province.
    ii)
    The Chair was pleased to report that after many years of discussion
    settlement has been achieved with the City of Burnaby about the future of
    Burnaby Mountain. The University will receive 15 million dollars which
    will be designated as Burnaby Mountain Endowment, and consideration can
    now proceed about the nature of the community at SFU which the University
    may wish to develop over the next period of time.
    ?
    5. ?
    Report of Committees
    a)
    ?
    Senate Nominating Committee
    i) ?
    Paper S.95-63 - Elections
    The following are the results of elections conducted by Senate.
    Vacancies for positions not filled will be carried over to the next meeting of
    Senate.
    Senate Committee on Disciplinary Appeals (SCODA)
    Two Alternate Faculty Members (at-large) for terms of office, from date of
    election to May 31, 1996.
    Elected by acclamation:
    ?
    Paul Budra
    0

    S.M.04/12/95
    Page 3
    Two Alternate Student Members (at-large) for terms of office, fromdate of
    election to May 31, 1996.
    Elected by acclamation:
    ?
    Ralph Jahn
    Senate Committee on Academic Planning (SCAP)/Senate Committee on
    University Budget (SCUB)
    One Student Senator to replace F. Karabotsos for balance term of office, from
    date of election to May 31, 1996.
    No nominations received
    Senate Committee on Continuing Studies (SCCS)
    Two Student Senators (One Regular, One Alternate) to fill an existing vacancy
    and to replace T. Morrison for terms of office, from date of election to May 31,
    1996. ?
    --
    No nominations received
    Senate Nominating Committee (SNC)
    One Student Senator to replace K. Giffen for term of office, from date of
    election to May 31, 1996.
    No nominations received
    Senate Graduate Awards Adjudication Committee (SGAAC)
    One Faculty Member (at-large) to fill an existing vacancy for term of office
    from date of election to May 31, 1997.
    Candidates: P. Fankboner, A. MacKinnon
    Elected: ?
    Allan MacKinnon
    Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies (SCUS)
    One Undergraduate Student Senator to replace T. Morrison for term of office
    from date of election to May 31, 1996.
    No nominations received
    Electoral Standing Committee (ESC)
    One Senator (at-large) to replaceK. Giffen for no specified term of office.
    No nominations received
    Senate Appeals Board (SAB)
    Four Faculty Members (at-large) (2 Regular, 2 Alternate) for two-year* terms
    of office, effective January 1, 1996.
    *10
    allow for continuity of membership, in
    this first election the candidates receiving the highest number of votes for the
    'Regular' and 'Alternate' positions will have a three-year term of office; the
    candidates receiving the second highest number of votes will have a two-year
    term of office. Thereafter, all positions will be filled for a two-year term of
    office.

    S.M. 04/12/95
    Page 4
    Elected by acclamation as Regular Members -
    Term of office January 1, 1996 - May 31, 1998:
    ?
    Stephen Steele
    Term of office January 1, 1996 - May 31, 1997:
    ?
    Martin Hahn
    Four Student Members (at-large) (2 Regular, 2 Alternate) for two-year* terms
    of office, effective January 1, 1996. *To allow for continuity of membership, in
    this first election the candidates receiving the highest number of votes for the
    'Regular' and 'Alternate' positions will have a two-year term of office; the
    candidates' receiving the second highest number of votes will have a one-year
    term of office. Thereafter, all positions will be filled for a two-year term of
    office.
    Candidates: R. Jahn, H.H.W. Nip
    Elected as Regular Members -
    Term of office January 1, 1996 - May 31,
    '
    1997:
    ?
    Harry H.W. Nip
    Term of office January 1, 1996 - May 31, 1996:
    ?
    Ralph Jahn
    Committee to Review Undergraduate Admissions (CRUA)
    Three Faculty Members (at-large) (2 Regular, 1' A1teinate) for two-year* terms
    of office, effective January 1, 1996. *To allow for continuity of membership, in
    this first election the candidate receiving the highest number of votes for the
    'Regular' position will have a three-year term of office; the candidate
    receiving the next highest number of votes will have a two-year term of
    office. Thereafter, all positions will be filled for a two-year term of office.
    Candidates for Regular position: L. Erickson, L. Peterson
    Elected -
    Term of office January 1, 1996 - May 31, 1998:
    ?
    Lynda Erickson
    Term of office January 1, 1996 - May' 31, 1997:
    ?
    Louis Peterson
    Elected by acclamation as Alternate position -
    Term of office January 1, 1996 - May 31, 1997:
    ?
    Norbert Haunerland
    Three Student Members (at-large) (2 Regular, 1 Alternate) for two-year* terms
    of office, effective January 1, 1996. *To allow for continuity of membership, in
    this first election the candidate receiving the highest number of votes for the
    'Regular' position will have a three-year term of office; the candidate
    receiving the next highest number of votes will have a two-year term of
    office. Thereafter, all positions will be filled for a two-year term of office.
    Candidates: R. Jahn, T. Morrison, H.H.W. Nip
    Elected as Regular Members -
    Term of office January, 1, 1996 - May 31, 1998:
    ?
    Tim Morrison
    Term of office January 1, 1996 - May 31, 1997:
    ?
    Harry H.W. Nip
    Elected as Alternate Member -
    Term of office January 1, 1996 - May 31, 1997:
    ?
    Ralph Jahn
    0

    S.M. 04/12/95
    Page 5
    b)
    ??
    Senate Committee on Academic Planning/Senate Committee on ?
    Undergraduate Studies
    1) ?
    Faculty of Applied Sciences
    Z Q_1LI -
    ?
    -f P
    aQ
    n
    i
    irr
    p
    a
    nriPn,irnmn1l Mnaünnf -
    Management
    Moved by D. Gagan, seconded by R. Marteniuk
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors, the proposed Bachelor of Science Degree in
    Environmental Planning and Management as set forth in S.95-
    - .
    ?
    ?
    64 including new .courses - ENPL.303-3, 311-3,.313-3, 320-3, 330=3, - - - ?
    ENPL 331-3, ENPL 340-3, ENPL 341-3, ENPL 342-3, ENPL 343-3,
    ENPL 346-3, ENPL 347-3, ENPL 350-3, ENPL 356-3, ENPL 360-3,
    ENPL 404-3, ENPL 410-3, ENPL 412-3, ENPL 420-3, ENPL 445-3,
    ENPL 446-3, ENPL 448-3, ENPL 455-3, ENPL 460-3, ENPL 464-4,
    ENPL471-3, ENPL 475-3, ENPL 477-3"
    F. Gobas, Acting Director, School of Resource and Environmental Planning
    and Management was in attendance to respond to questions.
    R. Marteniuk introduced the paper by explaining that in 1991 a task force was
    established to bring forward a new program of studies in Environmental
    Science.. Deliberations resulted in decision to split the program into three
    along Faculty lines - one in the Faculty of Science which has already been
    approved; another in the Faculty of Applied Sciences, and a third in the
    Faculty of Arts, both of which are currently before Senate. All three programs
    have a common core of courses, with the REM proposal attempting to
    produce a new kind of manager to meet current needs in the environment.
    B.C. in particular is developing many environmental initiatives at this time
    and it is expected that program development in this area will receive strong
    support from the Provincial Government.
    Opinion was expressed that the documentation before Senate contained many
    typographical and other errors which should have been corrected in earlier
    drafts at the committee level before coming to the floor of Senate. In
    particular, discrepancies between the sums put forward in the text on page 7
    versus the sums listed on page 8 for lower division requirements for the
    Major Program and upper division requirements in the Honors program
    were pointed out. Reference was made to the bottom of page 18 and the
    listing of compulsory core courses for Honors Program wherein courses are
    specified only as ENPL 3XX and ENPL 4XX. Referring to the list of optional
    courses on page 18, it was noted that prerequisites were shown for some

    S.M.04/12/95
    ?
    Page 6
    ?
    courses and not for others, and that the Calculus II course listed as MATH 151
    ?
    should be MATH 152. Objection was raised about Senate approving
    ?
    incomplete documentation, particularly when program requirements are not
    ?
    clearly specified. It was pointed out that many of these discrepancies probably
    ?
    occurred because the proposal went through a long process with many
    ?
    different people involved and many changes making it difficult to keep track
    of everything. It was argued that most of the points raised could be easily
    corrected.
    Opinion was expressed that the difference between an Honors Program and a
    Majors program is not just additional hours but involves an in-depth study
    of a subject, and concern was expressed that only one Directed Studies course
    appeared to differentiate the Honors program from the Major program in this
    proposal. Opinion was also expressed that a knowledge of integration should
    be required for a program in environmental planning, and inquiry was made
    as to why MATH 152 was not a required course rather than an optional
    course.
    Concerns were also expressed about the degree designation Bachelor of
    Science for a program which some felt did not contain sufficient Science
    content. Senate was reminded that this is not a traditional Science program.
    It is an integrated program which takes information from many disciplines
    with different approaches to environmental and resource management.
    Students are educated in a very broad sense to become environmental
    managers. Expectation is that graduates of this program will be working with
    teams of researchers to make important decisions about the basic sciences and
    their role in the environment. Senate was also reminded that the Faculty of
    Applied Sciences currently offers Bachelor of Science degrees, and opinion
    was expressed that faculty members from the School of Resource and
    Environmental Management and Planning spent several years developing
    this proposal, incorporated feedback from both SCUS and SCAP, and the
    proposal before Senate is their statement as to the kind of program they want
    and the program they feel is best suited for students undertaking studies in
    this area.
    In response to an inquiry about whether'
    '
    or not the program has been
    submitted to the Canadian Institute of Planners, Senate was advised that once
    the program is fully developed and new faculty hired, application will be
    made for certification of the program.
    Concern was expressed that present REM faculty members did not appear to
    be interested in teaching any of the core required courses. Senate was advised
    that efforts will be made by the Director of the School and the Dean's office to
    involve current faculty members in the teaching of lower level courses.

    S.M. 04/12/95
    Page 7
    . Discussion turned to the issue of funding, and Senate was assured that this
    program would not be implemented until full funding was available. It was
    felt that external funding, either from the private sector or from the
    Government, was the most likely source of support, and belief was expressed
    that special funding might be available from the Provincial Government
    since environmental issues remain a high priority. Financial support from
    the Academic Enhancement Fund was also noted as a possibility.
    In response to a concern that the external assessments were no longer valid
    because of the many changes the original proposal has gone through, it was
    pointed out that since the writing of this proposal, a new degree approval
    process has been established and a Provincial body will review and compare
    the proposal to what other universities are doing in this area prior to granting
    approval, and funding, at the Provincial level.
    Amendment moved by R. Marteniuk, seconded by J. Pierce
    "that the program be approved in principle with full approval
    contingent on the clarification of editorial type corrections"
    R. Marteniuk advised that the intent of the motion was to have substantive
    debate settled at this meeting with the program approved in principle, and
    with final approval at the next meeting of Senate contingent only on the
    correction of editorial changes.
    Discussion ensued with regard to the consequences of approving the
    amendment.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    AMENDMENT DEFEATED
    Discussion followed on the advisability of referring the motion.
    Moved by E. Alderson, seconded by P. Percival
    "that the proposal contained in S.95-64 be referred back to the
    Senate Committee on Academic Planning"
    In order to facilitate more useful feedback with respect to the referral, the
    Chair ruled that discussion on the main motion could continue prior to
    taking a vote on referral.
    Given the current financial situation, concern was expressed about the need
    for six new faculty members to offer this program. It was noted that if faculty
    • members in REM taught four courses instead of three as do many other
    faculty members in other departments, only two new faculty members would
    be required. Opinion was expressed that this kind of expansion should not be

    S.M. 04/12/95
    Page 8
    encouraged at a time when budget cutbacks are likely. In response, it was
    pointed out that faculty workloads in the Faculty of Applied Sciences are in
    accordance with the University policy on faculty workload.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION TO REFER CARRIED
    2) ?
    Faculty of Arts
    S
    i) ?
    Paper S.95-65 - Undergraduate Curriculum Revisions
    Moved by D. Gagan, seconded by J
    .
    Osborne
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors
    the curriculum revisions for the Faculty of Arts as set
    forth in S.95-65
    as follows:
    S.95-65a
    Department of Archaeology
    S.95-65b
    School for the Contemporary Arts
    S.95-65c
    School of Criminology
    S.95-65d
    Department of Economics
    S.95-65e
    Department of French
    S.95-65f
    Department of Geography
    S.95-65g
    Department of History
    S.95-65h
    Humanities Program
    S.95-65i
    Division of Interdisciplinary Studies
    S.95-65j
    Department of Linguistics
    S.95-65k
    Department of Political Science
    S.95-651
    Department of Psychology
    S.95-65m
    SCES/SFU Program
    S.95-65n
    Department of Sociology and Anthropology
    S.95-65o
    Department of Spanish and Latin American Studies
    S.95-65p
    University College of the Fraser Valley/SFU"
    Opinion was expressed that Senate should receive more specific information
    with regard to the items reported to Senate for information. It was pointed
    out that SCUS acts under the delegated authority of Senate to approve minor
    curriculum revisions and that full documentation is available in the
    Registrar's Office to any member of Senate interested in reviewing more
    details.
    .
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    Senate received information that, SCUS, acting under delegated authority,
    approved a variety of revisions to existing courses as outlined in SCUS 95-15a,
    15c, 15d, 15e, 15g, 15h, 15i, 15j, 15k, 151, 15m, 15p. SCUS also approved
    revisions to existing Chinese courses as outlined in SCUS 95-10, including a
    waiver to permit offering of the revised courses in 96-1.
    .

    S.M.04/12/95
    Page 9
    ii)
    Paper S.95-66 - Asia-Canada Program - Proposed Minor or Extended
    Minor
    Moved by D. Gagan, seconded E. Alderson
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors, the proposed Asia-Canada Program as set forth in
    S.95-66 including - Proposed Minor or Extended Minor Program;
    New courses ASC 101-3, ASC 102-3, ASC 201-3, ASC 300-3, ASC
    301-3, ASC 303-3, ASC 400-3, ASC 401-3"
    J .
    Walls, Director, Lam Centre for International Communication, was in
    attendance in order to respond to questions.
    ?
    -
    ?
    - - - -
    Reference was made to ASC 303 and objection was raised about the course
    having 'The Political Economy of Japan' in its title when Economics did not
    form part of the course. It was pointed out that the actual title of the course
    would be 'Selected Topics in Japanese Studies; the reference to the Political
    Economy of Japan was used only for the sample course outline and would not
    be part of the official Calendar title.
    Brief discussion took place with respect to the workload of faculty members
    teaching in this program.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    Senate received information that acting under delegated authority, SCUS
    approved the following revisions as detailed in SCUS 95-15b: Course changes
    - from CS 201-3 to ASC 200-3; CS 251-3 to ASC 202-3; CS 311-3 to ASC 302-3.
    iii)
    Paper S.95-67 - Faculty of Arts Proposal for Environmental Studies
    Moved by D. Gagan, seconded by E. Alderson
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors, the Faculty of Arts proposal for Environmental
    Studies as set forth in S.95-67, including Proposed Joint Major -
    Geography /Economics - Environmental Specialty; Proposed
    Geography Major - Environmental Specialty; New courses -
    GEOG 389-4, GEOG 450-4"
    Note: The Faculty
    of
    Arts proposal for Environmental Studies included a
    • proposed B.Sc. in Environmental Science (Physical Geography) which has not
    yet been approved by the Faculty
    of
    Science. It will come forward to Senate
    for approval at a Inter date.
    Senate was advised that the proposal is currently

    S.M.04/12/95
    Page 10
    before the Faculty of Science Undergraduate Curriculum Committee and it is
    expected to come forward to Senate over the next month or two.
    Reference was made to Page 5, Program I, Upper Division Economics
    requirements; a suggestion to change "and at least two 400-level Economics"
    to
    friendly
    "and at
    amendment.
    least two 400-level Econon,ics or BLIEC courses"
    was accepted as a
    Some editorial changes were suggested, including a vector change for GEOG
    450-4 from 0-3-0 to 1-3-0.
    Referring to the course requirements for Program II outlined on page 7, it was
    pointed out that ENPL 311-3 is listed among the upper division course
    requirements. Since the proposal from REM (including this new course) was
    referred back, inquiry was made as to what effect this would have on Program
    II. Since these programs were developed on the notion of integrating core
    disciplinary courses, all students going through the Faculty of Arts program as
    well as the proposed program in the Faculty of Applied Sciences, would he
    required to take the same seven core courses, and if the REM proposal is not
    approved then Program II would have to be modified.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    iv) ?
    Paper S.95-68 - Minor Programs - University
    .
    College of the Fraser
    Valley/Simon Fraser University
    Moved by D. Gagan, seconded by E. Alderson
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors, as set forth in S.95-68, the Minors in those subjects
    that have been approved with Extended Minors in the BA
    Program at the University College of the Fraser Valley"
    D. Gagan provided brief background infbimation and advised that the
    proposal is mainly housekeeping in nature by way of extending a courtesy to
    UCFV while undergoing the transition that will eventually see them offering
    their own programs.
    3)
    ?
    Faculty of Education
    i) ?
    Paper S.95-69 - Undergraduate Curriculum Revisions
    Moved by D. Gagan, seconded by M. Wideen
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors the curriculum revisions for the Faculty of

    S.M. 04/12/95
    Page 11
    . Education, as set forth in S.95-69 including: change to Minor in
    Learning Disabilities; Changes to B.Ed. Degree - General Program
    and Honors Program"
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    Senate received information that acting under delegated authority, SCUS
    approved a variety of revisions to existing courses as detailed in SCUS 95-17.
    4)
    Faculty of Science
    i) ?
    Paper S.95-70 - Undergraduate Curriculum Revisions
    Moved by D. Gagan, seconded by C. Jones
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors the curriculum revisions for the Faculty of Science as
    set forth in S.95-70 as follows:
    S.95-70a ?
    Department of Biological Sciences
    S.95-70b ?
    Earth Sciences Program
    S.95-70c ?
    Department of Mathematics and Statistics
    S.95-70d ?
    Department of Physics"
    M. Roberts, Director, Earth Sciences, was in attendance in order to respond to
    questions.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    Senate received information that, SCUS, acting under delegated authority
    approved a variety of revisions to existing courses as detailed in SCUS 95-18a,
    18d, and The.
    5)
    Paper S.95-71 - Deletion of Courses not offered
    Moved by D. Gagan, seconded by J
    .
    Osborne
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors, that the following courses be deleted: CMPT 111, CMPT
    113, CMPT 114, CMPT 115, ENSC 451, FPA 164, FPA 165, GEOG 447,
    SPAN 452, SPAN 454, BUS 479, BISC 003, CHEM 417, CHEM 433"
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    S

    S.M. 04/12/95
    Page 12
    C)
    i) ?
    ?
    Paper
    Senate
    S.95-72
    Committee
    - External
    on Academic
    Review
    Planning-
    Department
    ?
    of Women's Studies -
    0
    For Information
    M. Kimball, Department of Women's Studies, was in attendance in
    order to respond to questions. The external review report was received
    by Senate for information.
    d) ?
    Senate Committee on Agenda and Rules
    i) ?
    Paper S.95-73 - Notice of Motion
    Senate's attention was drawn to the Notice of Motion concerning a
    revision to the Rules of Senate which will be discussed at the next Senate
    meeting.
    6.
    Other Business
    There was no other business.
    7.
    Information
    The next regularly scheduled meeting of Senate will take place on Monday,
    January 8, 1996.
    The Assembly moved directly into Closed Session at 9:30 p.m.
    W. R. Heath
    Secretary of Senate
    S

    Back to top