*
/?mended 6&
fk2I-
3nuarj,
1.qq
DRAFT UNTIL APPROVED BY SENATE
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE SENATE OF SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY HELD
ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 4, 1995 IN ROOM 3210 WMX, 7:00 P.M.
OPEN SESSION
Present:
?
Stubbs, j.O., Chair
Alderson, E.
?
Absent: ?
Barrow, R.
Arnason, K.
?
Blazenko, C.
Beattie, S.
?
Chan, K.
Blaney, J
.
?
Dahl, V.
Boland, L. ?
Dean, C.
Bullock, D. ?
Dhir, R.
Ciconte, R. ?
Eaton, C.
D'Auria, J
.
?
Lewis, B.
Dobb, T.
?
Luk, W.S.
Dunsterville, V. ?
McInnes, D.
Etherington, L: ?
- ? Sanghera, B.
Gagan, D.
?
Segal, J.
Heinrich, K.
?
Warsh, M.
Howlett, M.
Jahn, R.
Jones, C.H.W.
Karabotsos, F.
Keto, D.
LeMare, L.
?
In attendance:
Lord, T. ?
Gobas, F.
W
?
Marteniuk, R. ?
Kimball, M.
Mathewes, R.
?
Roberts, M.
Mauser, C.
?
Walls, J.
McAskiII, I.
Morrison, T.
Naef, B.
Osborne, J.
Percival, P.
Peterson, L.
Pierce, J.
Rawicz, A.
Reed, C.
Ross, D.
Scharfe, E.
Shapiro, S.
Stewart, M.L.
Underhill, 0.
Whitbread, K.
Wickstrom, N.
Wideen, M.
Winne, P.
Wrenn, I'. (representing B. Clayman)
Heath, R., Secretary
Grant, B., Recording Secretary
*
S.M. 04112/95
Page
The Chair welcomed new Senator K. Whitbread, Faculty of Arts, to the
Approval
meeting. ?
of the Agenda
•
The Agenda was approved as distributed.
?
2. ?
Approval of the Minutes of the O
p
en Session of November 6, 1995
The Minutes were approved as distributed.
?
3. ?
Business Arising from the Minutes
Referring to the request on page 3 for vector information on the new course
CMNS 200, Senate was advised that this information will be reported at the
next meeting of Senate.
?
4. ?
Report of the Chair
i)
Senate was advised that in light of the uncertainty of the financial
situation, particularly since the University is not expected to have any real
clarity about the budget situation for some period of time, a hiring freeze has
been issued for all University appointments. Although he would not
normally reference the recent budget cuts to post-secondary education in
Ontario, the Chair pointed out that the B.C. Government is looking closely at
what is happening in that Province.
ii)
The Chair was pleased to report that after many years of discussion
settlement has been achieved with the City of Burnaby about the future of
Burnaby Mountain. The University will receive 15 million dollars which
will be designated as Burnaby Mountain Endowment, and consideration can
now proceed about the nature of the community at SFU which the University
may wish to develop over the next period of time.
?
5. ?
Report of Committees
a)
?
Senate Nominating Committee
i) ?
Paper S.95-63 - Elections
The following are the results of elections conducted by Senate.
Vacancies for positions not filled will be carried over to the next meeting of
Senate.
Senate Committee on Disciplinary Appeals (SCODA)
Two Alternate Faculty Members (at-large) for terms of office, from date of
election to May 31, 1996.
Elected by acclamation:
?
Paul Budra
0
S.M.04/12/95
Page 3
Two Alternate Student Members (at-large) for terms of office, fromdate of
election to May 31, 1996.
Elected by acclamation:
?
Ralph Jahn
Senate Committee on Academic Planning (SCAP)/Senate Committee on
University Budget (SCUB)
One Student Senator to replace F. Karabotsos for balance term of office, from
date of election to May 31, 1996.
No nominations received
Senate Committee on Continuing Studies (SCCS)
Two Student Senators (One Regular, One Alternate) to fill an existing vacancy
and to replace T. Morrison for terms of office, from date of election to May 31,
1996. ?
--
No nominations received
Senate Nominating Committee (SNC)
One Student Senator to replace K. Giffen for term of office, from date of
election to May 31, 1996.
No nominations received
Senate Graduate Awards Adjudication Committee (SGAAC)
One Faculty Member (at-large) to fill an existing vacancy for term of office
from date of election to May 31, 1997.
Candidates: P. Fankboner, A. MacKinnon
Elected: ?
Allan MacKinnon
Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies (SCUS)
One Undergraduate Student Senator to replace T. Morrison for term of office
from date of election to May 31, 1996.
No nominations received
Electoral Standing Committee (ESC)
One Senator (at-large) to replaceK. Giffen for no specified term of office.
No nominations received
Senate Appeals Board (SAB)
Four Faculty Members (at-large) (2 Regular, 2 Alternate) for two-year* terms
of office, effective January 1, 1996.
*10
allow for continuity of membership, in
this first election the candidates receiving the highest number of votes for the
'Regular' and 'Alternate' positions will have a three-year term of office; the
candidates receiving the second highest number of votes will have a two-year
term of office. Thereafter, all positions will be filled for a two-year term of
office.
S.M. 04/12/95
Page 4
Elected by acclamation as Regular Members -
Term of office January 1, 1996 - May 31, 1998:
?
Stephen Steele
Term of office January 1, 1996 - May 31, 1997:
?
Martin Hahn
Four Student Members (at-large) (2 Regular, 2 Alternate) for two-year* terms
of office, effective January 1, 1996. *To allow for continuity of membership, in
this first election the candidates receiving the highest number of votes for the
'Regular' and 'Alternate' positions will have a two-year term of office; the
candidates' receiving the second highest number of votes will have a one-year
term of office. Thereafter, all positions will be filled for a two-year term of
office.
Candidates: R. Jahn, H.H.W. Nip
Elected as Regular Members -
Term of office January 1, 1996 - May 31,
'
1997:
?
Harry H.W. Nip
Term of office January 1, 1996 - May 31, 1996:
?
Ralph Jahn
Committee to Review Undergraduate Admissions (CRUA)
Three Faculty Members (at-large) (2 Regular, 1' A1teinate) for two-year* terms
of office, effective January 1, 1996. *To allow for continuity of membership, in
this first election the candidate receiving the highest number of votes for the
'Regular' position will have a three-year term of office; the candidate
receiving the next highest number of votes will have a two-year term of
office. Thereafter, all positions will be filled for a two-year term of office.
Candidates for Regular position: L. Erickson, L. Peterson
Elected -
Term of office January 1, 1996 - May 31, 1998:
?
Lynda Erickson
Term of office January 1, 1996 - May' 31, 1997:
?
Louis Peterson
Elected by acclamation as Alternate position -
Term of office January 1, 1996 - May 31, 1997:
?
Norbert Haunerland
Three Student Members (at-large) (2 Regular, 1 Alternate) for two-year* terms
of office, effective January 1, 1996. *To allow for continuity of membership, in
this first election the candidate receiving the highest number of votes for the
'Regular' position will have a three-year term of office; the candidate
receiving the next highest number of votes will have a two-year term of
office. Thereafter, all positions will be filled for a two-year term of office.
Candidates: R. Jahn, T. Morrison, H.H.W. Nip
Elected as Regular Members -
Term of office January, 1, 1996 - May 31, 1998:
?
Tim Morrison
Term of office January 1, 1996 - May 31, 1997:
?
Harry H.W. Nip
Elected as Alternate Member -
Term of office January 1, 1996 - May 31, 1997:
?
Ralph Jahn
0
S.M. 04/12/95
Page 5
b)
??
Senate Committee on Academic Planning/Senate Committee on ?
Undergraduate Studies
1) ?
Faculty of Applied Sciences
Z Q_1LI -
?
-f P
aQ
n
i
irr
p
a
nriPn,irnmn1l Mnaünnf -
Management
Moved by D. Gagan, seconded by R. Marteniuk
"that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
Governors, the proposed Bachelor of Science Degree in
Environmental Planning and Management as set forth in S.95-
- .
?
?
64 including new .courses - ENPL.303-3, 311-3,.313-3, 320-3, 330=3, - - - ?
ENPL 331-3, ENPL 340-3, ENPL 341-3, ENPL 342-3, ENPL 343-3,
ENPL 346-3, ENPL 347-3, ENPL 350-3, ENPL 356-3, ENPL 360-3,
ENPL 404-3, ENPL 410-3, ENPL 412-3, ENPL 420-3, ENPL 445-3,
ENPL 446-3, ENPL 448-3, ENPL 455-3, ENPL 460-3, ENPL 464-4,
ENPL471-3, ENPL 475-3, ENPL 477-3"
F. Gobas, Acting Director, School of Resource and Environmental Planning
and Management was in attendance to respond to questions.
R. Marteniuk introduced the paper by explaining that in 1991 a task force was
established to bring forward a new program of studies in Environmental
Science.. Deliberations resulted in decision to split the program into three
along Faculty lines - one in the Faculty of Science which has already been
approved; another in the Faculty of Applied Sciences, and a third in the
Faculty of Arts, both of which are currently before Senate. All three programs
have a common core of courses, with the REM proposal attempting to
produce a new kind of manager to meet current needs in the environment.
B.C. in particular is developing many environmental initiatives at this time
and it is expected that program development in this area will receive strong
support from the Provincial Government.
Opinion was expressed that the documentation before Senate contained many
typographical and other errors which should have been corrected in earlier
drafts at the committee level before coming to the floor of Senate. In
particular, discrepancies between the sums put forward in the text on page 7
versus the sums listed on page 8 for lower division requirements for the
Major Program and upper division requirements in the Honors program
were pointed out. Reference was made to the bottom of page 18 and the
listing of compulsory core courses for Honors Program wherein courses are
specified only as ENPL 3XX and ENPL 4XX. Referring to the list of optional
courses on page 18, it was noted that prerequisites were shown for some
S.M.04/12/95
?
Page 6
?
courses and not for others, and that the Calculus II course listed as MATH 151
?
should be MATH 152. Objection was raised about Senate approving
?
incomplete documentation, particularly when program requirements are not
?
clearly specified. It was pointed out that many of these discrepancies probably
?
occurred because the proposal went through a long process with many
?
different people involved and many changes making it difficult to keep track
of everything. It was argued that most of the points raised could be easily
corrected.
Opinion was expressed that the difference between an Honors Program and a
Majors program is not just additional hours but involves an in-depth study
of a subject, and concern was expressed that only one Directed Studies course
appeared to differentiate the Honors program from the Major program in this
proposal. Opinion was also expressed that a knowledge of integration should
be required for a program in environmental planning, and inquiry was made
as to why MATH 152 was not a required course rather than an optional
course.
Concerns were also expressed about the degree designation Bachelor of
Science for a program which some felt did not contain sufficient Science
content. Senate was reminded that this is not a traditional Science program.
It is an integrated program which takes information from many disciplines
with different approaches to environmental and resource management.
Students are educated in a very broad sense to become environmental
managers. Expectation is that graduates of this program will be working with
teams of researchers to make important decisions about the basic sciences and
their role in the environment. Senate was also reminded that the Faculty of
Applied Sciences currently offers Bachelor of Science degrees, and opinion
was expressed that faculty members from the School of Resource and
Environmental Management and Planning spent several years developing
this proposal, incorporated feedback from both SCUS and SCAP, and the
proposal before Senate is their statement as to the kind of program they want
and the program they feel is best suited for students undertaking studies in
this area.
In response to an inquiry about whether'
'
or not the program has been
submitted to the Canadian Institute of Planners, Senate was advised that once
the program is fully developed and new faculty hired, application will be
made for certification of the program.
Concern was expressed that present REM faculty members did not appear to
be interested in teaching any of the core required courses. Senate was advised
that efforts will be made by the Director of the School and the Dean's office to
involve current faculty members in the teaching of lower level courses.
S.M. 04/12/95
Page 7
. Discussion turned to the issue of funding, and Senate was assured that this
program would not be implemented until full funding was available. It was
felt that external funding, either from the private sector or from the
Government, was the most likely source of support, and belief was expressed
that special funding might be available from the Provincial Government
since environmental issues remain a high priority. Financial support from
the Academic Enhancement Fund was also noted as a possibility.
In response to a concern that the external assessments were no longer valid
because of the many changes the original proposal has gone through, it was
pointed out that since the writing of this proposal, a new degree approval
process has been established and a Provincial body will review and compare
the proposal to what other universities are doing in this area prior to granting
approval, and funding, at the Provincial level.
Amendment moved by R. Marteniuk, seconded by J. Pierce
"that the program be approved in principle with full approval
contingent on the clarification of editorial type corrections"
R. Marteniuk advised that the intent of the motion was to have substantive
debate settled at this meeting with the program approved in principle, and
with final approval at the next meeting of Senate contingent only on the
correction of editorial changes.
Discussion ensued with regard to the consequences of approving the
amendment.
Question was called, and a vote taken.
?
AMENDMENT DEFEATED
Discussion followed on the advisability of referring the motion.
Moved by E. Alderson, seconded by P. Percival
"that the proposal contained in S.95-64 be referred back to the
Senate Committee on Academic Planning"
In order to facilitate more useful feedback with respect to the referral, the
Chair ruled that discussion on the main motion could continue prior to
taking a vote on referral.
Given the current financial situation, concern was expressed about the need
for six new faculty members to offer this program. It was noted that if faculty
• members in REM taught four courses instead of three as do many other
faculty members in other departments, only two new faculty members would
be required. Opinion was expressed that this kind of expansion should not be
S.M. 04/12/95
Page 8
encouraged at a time when budget cutbacks are likely. In response, it was
pointed out that faculty workloads in the Faculty of Applied Sciences are in
accordance with the University policy on faculty workload.
Question was called, and a vote taken.
?
MOTION TO REFER CARRIED
2) ?
Faculty of Arts
S
i) ?
Paper S.95-65 - Undergraduate Curriculum Revisions
Moved by D. Gagan, seconded by J
.
Osborne
"that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
Governors
the curriculum revisions for the Faculty of Arts as set
forth in S.95-65
as follows:
S.95-65a
Department of Archaeology
S.95-65b
School for the Contemporary Arts
S.95-65c
School of Criminology
S.95-65d
Department of Economics
S.95-65e
Department of French
S.95-65f
Department of Geography
S.95-65g
Department of History
S.95-65h
Humanities Program
S.95-65i
Division of Interdisciplinary Studies
S.95-65j
Department of Linguistics
S.95-65k
Department of Political Science
S.95-651
Department of Psychology
S.95-65m
SCES/SFU Program
S.95-65n
Department of Sociology and Anthropology
S.95-65o
Department of Spanish and Latin American Studies
S.95-65p
University College of the Fraser Valley/SFU"
Opinion was expressed that Senate should receive more specific information
with regard to the items reported to Senate for information. It was pointed
out that SCUS acts under the delegated authority of Senate to approve minor
curriculum revisions and that full documentation is available in the
Registrar's Office to any member of Senate interested in reviewing more
details.
.
Question was called, and a vote taken.
?
MOTION CARRIED
Senate received information that, SCUS, acting under delegated authority,
approved a variety of revisions to existing courses as outlined in SCUS 95-15a,
15c, 15d, 15e, 15g, 15h, 15i, 15j, 15k, 151, 15m, 15p. SCUS also approved
revisions to existing Chinese courses as outlined in SCUS 95-10, including a
waiver to permit offering of the revised courses in 96-1.
.
S.M.04/12/95
Page 9
ii)
Paper S.95-66 - Asia-Canada Program - Proposed Minor or Extended
Minor
Moved by D. Gagan, seconded E. Alderson
"that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
Governors, the proposed Asia-Canada Program as set forth in
S.95-66 including - Proposed Minor or Extended Minor Program;
New courses ASC 101-3, ASC 102-3, ASC 201-3, ASC 300-3, ASC
301-3, ASC 303-3, ASC 400-3, ASC 401-3"
J .
Walls, Director, Lam Centre for International Communication, was in
attendance in order to respond to questions.
?
-
?
- - - -
Reference was made to ASC 303 and objection was raised about the course
having 'The Political Economy of Japan' in its title when Economics did not
form part of the course. It was pointed out that the actual title of the course
would be 'Selected Topics in Japanese Studies; the reference to the Political
Economy of Japan was used only for the sample course outline and would not
be part of the official Calendar title.
Brief discussion took place with respect to the workload of faculty members
teaching in this program.
Question was called, and a vote taken.
?
MOTION CARRIED
Senate received information that acting under delegated authority, SCUS
approved the following revisions as detailed in SCUS 95-15b: Course changes
- from CS 201-3 to ASC 200-3; CS 251-3 to ASC 202-3; CS 311-3 to ASC 302-3.
iii)
Paper S.95-67 - Faculty of Arts Proposal for Environmental Studies
Moved by D. Gagan, seconded by E. Alderson
"that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
Governors, the Faculty of Arts proposal for Environmental
Studies as set forth in S.95-67, including Proposed Joint Major -
Geography /Economics - Environmental Specialty; Proposed
Geography Major - Environmental Specialty; New courses -
GEOG 389-4, GEOG 450-4"
Note: The Faculty
of
Arts proposal for Environmental Studies included a
• proposed B.Sc. in Environmental Science (Physical Geography) which has not
yet been approved by the Faculty
of
Science. It will come forward to Senate
for approval at a Inter date.
Senate was advised that the proposal is currently
S.M.04/12/95
Page 10
before the Faculty of Science Undergraduate Curriculum Committee and it is
expected to come forward to Senate over the next month or two.
Reference was made to Page 5, Program I, Upper Division Economics
requirements; a suggestion to change "and at least two 400-level Economics"
to
friendly
"and at
amendment.
least two 400-level Econon,ics or BLIEC courses"
was accepted as a
Some editorial changes were suggested, including a vector change for GEOG
450-4 from 0-3-0 to 1-3-0.
Referring to the course requirements for Program II outlined on page 7, it was
pointed out that ENPL 311-3 is listed among the upper division course
requirements. Since the proposal from REM (including this new course) was
referred back, inquiry was made as to what effect this would have on Program
II. Since these programs were developed on the notion of integrating core
disciplinary courses, all students going through the Faculty of Arts program as
well as the proposed program in the Faculty of Applied Sciences, would he
required to take the same seven core courses, and if the REM proposal is not
approved then Program II would have to be modified.
Question was called, and a vote taken.
?
MOTION CARRIED
iv) ?
Paper S.95-68 - Minor Programs - University
.
College of the Fraser
Valley/Simon Fraser University
Moved by D. Gagan, seconded by E. Alderson
"that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
Governors, as set forth in S.95-68, the Minors in those subjects
that have been approved with Extended Minors in the BA
Program at the University College of the Fraser Valley"
D. Gagan provided brief background infbimation and advised that the
proposal is mainly housekeeping in nature by way of extending a courtesy to
UCFV while undergoing the transition that will eventually see them offering
their own programs.
3)
?
Faculty of Education
i) ?
Paper S.95-69 - Undergraduate Curriculum Revisions
Moved by D. Gagan, seconded by M. Wideen
"that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
Governors the curriculum revisions for the Faculty of
S.M. 04/12/95
Page 11
. Education, as set forth in S.95-69 including: change to Minor in
Learning Disabilities; Changes to B.Ed. Degree - General Program
and Honors Program"
Question was called, and a vote taken.
?
MOTION CARRIED
Senate received information that acting under delegated authority, SCUS
approved a variety of revisions to existing courses as detailed in SCUS 95-17.
4)
Faculty of Science
i) ?
Paper S.95-70 - Undergraduate Curriculum Revisions
Moved by D. Gagan, seconded by C. Jones
"that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
Governors the curriculum revisions for the Faculty of Science as
set forth in S.95-70 as follows:
S.95-70a ?
Department of Biological Sciences
S.95-70b ?
Earth Sciences Program
S.95-70c ?
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
S.95-70d ?
Department of Physics"
M. Roberts, Director, Earth Sciences, was in attendance in order to respond to
questions.
Question was called, and a vote taken.
?
MOTION CARRIED
Senate received information that, SCUS, acting under delegated authority
approved a variety of revisions to existing courses as detailed in SCUS 95-18a,
18d, and The.
5)
Paper S.95-71 - Deletion of Courses not offered
Moved by D. Gagan, seconded by J
.
Osborne
"that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
Governors, that the following courses be deleted: CMPT 111, CMPT
113, CMPT 114, CMPT 115, ENSC 451, FPA 164, FPA 165, GEOG 447,
SPAN 452, SPAN 454, BUS 479, BISC 003, CHEM 417, CHEM 433"
Question was called, and a vote taken.
?
MOTION CARRIED
S
S.M. 04/12/95
Page 12
C)
i) ?
?
Paper
Senate
S.95-72
Committee
- External
on Academic
Review
Planning-
Department
?
of Women's Studies -
0
For Information
M. Kimball, Department of Women's Studies, was in attendance in
order to respond to questions. The external review report was received
by Senate for information.
d) ?
Senate Committee on Agenda and Rules
i) ?
Paper S.95-73 - Notice of Motion
Senate's attention was drawn to the Notice of Motion concerning a
revision to the Rules of Senate which will be discussed at the next Senate
meeting.
6.
Other Business
There was no other business.
7.
Information
The next regularly scheduled meeting of Senate will take place on Monday,
January 8, 1996.
The Assembly moved directly into Closed Session at 9:30 p.m.
W. R. Heath
Secretary of Senate
S