. DRAFT UNTIL APPROVED BY SENATE
    MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE SENATE OF SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY HELD
    ?
    ON MONDAY, JANUARY 9, 1995 IN ROOM 3210 WMX, 7:00 P.M.
    ?
    OPEN SESSION
    .
    Present: ?
    Stubbs, J.O., Chair
    Alderson, E.
    Amason, K.
    Barrow, R.
    Blaney, J.
    Boland, L.
    Bullock, D.
    Chan, K.
    Cina A.
    Clayman, B.
    Cohen, M.
    Crawford, C.
    D'Auria, J.
    Dhir, A.
    Driver, J.
    Einstein, D.
    Etherington, L.
    Hater, L.
    Heinrich, K.
    Hoeflich, K.
    Jones, C.H.W.
    Lord, T.
    Luk,W.S.
    Marteniuk, R.
    Mathewes, A.
    McInnes, D.
    Morrison, T.
    Munro, J.
    Naef, B.
    Osborne, J.
    Percival, P.
    Perr
    y
    , T.
    Peterson, L.
    Rawicz, A.
    Sanghera,. B.
    Shapiro, S.
    Stewart, M.L.
    Swartz, N.
    Vining, A.
    Wickstrom, N.
    Wideen, M.
    Winne, P.
    Heath, W.R, Secretary
    Grant, B., Recording Secretary
    Absent:
    ?
    Bacani,J.
    Beattie, S.
    Dean,.C.
    Dobb, T.
    Dunsterville, V.
    Eaton, C.
    Giffen, K.
    LeMare, L.
    Mauser, G.
    McAskiII, I.
    Segal, J.
    Warsh, M.
    Wu, S.
    In attendance:
    Cullen, J.
    Dutton, P.
    Farrell, A.
    Roberts, M.

    S.M. 09/01/95
    Page
    1.
    Approval of the Agenda
    At the request of the Vice-President, Academic, item 5.a).ii) Paper S.95-2 was
    withdrawn from the Agenda. The revised Agenda was approved.
    2.
    Approval of the Minutes of the Open Session of December 5. 1994
    Following a request to amend the words "pointed out" to "suggested" (first
    sentence of the last paragraph on page 4), the Minutes were approved as
    amended.
    3.
    Business Arising from the Minutes
    There was no business arising from the Minutes.
    4.
    Report of the Chair
    The Chair reported that the Government has struck a committee to' decide on
    the future of Royal Roads. Deadline for the committee's recommendatiàn is
    February 28, 1995.
    5.
    Report of Committees
    a) ?
    Senate Committee on Academic Planning
    i) ?
    Paper S.95-1 - External Review - Department of History - For Information
    P. Dutton, Chair, Department of History, was in
    ,
    attendance in order to respond
    to questions. ? . ?
    ..
    In the brief discussion that took place with respect to Recommendation 15
    concerning hiring priorities in East Asian and Women's History, Senate was
    informed that the question of when a new position in Women's History will be
    authorized has not yet been resolved.
    Discussion turned to Recommendation 11 regarding credit for graduate
    supervision. It was noted that this issue appears to be a common problem
    among Departments across the University, and concern was expressed that
    there appeared to be no solution forthcoming from the administration. Senate
    was advised that the present faculty workload policy includes a mechanism for
    dealing with this issue but it is not widely
    .
    useth A revised policy, presently
    being circulated in its second draft, attempts 'to address thisissue but it was
    pointed out that policy can only be facilitating'
    ,
    and that this issue has to be
    worked out within each department.
    ?
    . ?
    .
    Commenting in general about external reviews, it was noted that the majority of
    external reviewers have been Canadian. 'Opinion was, expressed that an
    international and somewhat broader perspective of review, would be more
    desirable and inquiry was made about using reviewers from the United States
    or Great Britain.'Reviewers
    ,
    from the United States have 'been used but it is not
    feasible to bring reviewers from elsewhere.. because of.travel 'costs and other.
    factors..History is a large discipline within Canada and it was felt it could be

    S
    S.M. 09/01/95
    Page 3
    well reviewed by faculty from other Canadian universities. However, in certain
    disciplines where that might not be the case, the University is not bound to limit
    itself to Canadian reviewers.
    b) ?
    Senate Committee on Academic Planning/Senate Committee on
    Undergraduate Studies
    i)
    Paper S.95-3 - Undergraduate Curriculum Revisions - Arts
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by T. Lord
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors the curriculum revisions for the Faculty of Arts as set
    forth in S.95-3 as follows:
    S.95-3a Cognitive Science Program"
    Reference was made to the rationale statement, on page 3 referring to MACM
    101 replacing MATH 151 as a prerequisite, and it was pointed out that the
    proposed changes had no effect on MATH 151 since it was still a hidden
    prerequisite for CMPT 201. Brief discussion followed, and the Registrar was
    asked to seek clarification and report back should any further adjustments be
    necessary.
    Question was called, and a vote taken
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    Secretary's Note
    ,
    : At the Senate meeting of December 5, 1994 in S.94-66b, the
    prerequisite for CMPT 201 was changed from CMPT 101 or 104, 105, MATH
    151 !Q.CMPT 101 (or 104), 105, MACM 101. MATH 151 is no longer a hidden
    prerequisite.
    ii)
    Paper S.95-4 - Undergraduate Curriculum Revisions - Education
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by A. Barrow
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors the curriculum revisions for the Faculty of Education as
    set forth in S.95-4 as follows:,
    i)
    New courses:
    EDPR 410,411,412,413 - Field Based Studies in
    Curriculum Development
    EDPR 414,415,416,417 - Field Based Studies in
    Educational Practice
    ii)
    Change of grading for EDUC 452-8"
    Discussion ensued with respect to the grading alternatives of pass/fail as
    opposed to pass/withdraw. Senate was advised that the grades of P/W show
    on a student's transcript but do not get calculated in the GPA, whereas an F
    grade will affect the GPA. Courses graded on a P/W basis are subject to the
    0

    S.M. 09/01/95
    Page 4
    same Calendar regulation as other courses with regard to. the number of times
    they can be repeated.
    It was noted that EDUC 452 is a required course in a Minor program and
    opinion was expressed that students taking this course as a requirement should
    be graded in the normal way.
    It was suggested that, since there appeared to be no Calendar regulation with
    respect to criteria under which the category of P/W is to be used, the University
    should examine this issue and draft a policy specifying under what conditions
    this would be an appropriate way of grading courses. It was pointed out that
    any course being proposed for a P/W grade has to come to Senate for approval
    and be accompanied with a rationale which is acceptable to Senate. Since an
    appropriate grading system is ultimately dependent on a particular course
    situation, opinion was expressed that it would not be particularly helpful to
    attempt to develop a formal policy with respect to criteria.
    Moved by J. D'Auria, seconded by K. Amason
    "that the motion be divided to allow consideration of item (1) and
    item (ii) separately"
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION TO DIVIDE CARRIED
    Item(i)
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    Item (ii)
    Moved by J. D'Auria, seconded by P. Percival
    "that this item be referred back to the Senate Committee on
    Academic Planning for further discussion and additional rationale"
    Brief discussion ensued with respect to the merits and route of referral.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION TO REFER FAILED
    Question was called on Item (ii),
    and a vote taken. ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    iii) ?
    Paper S.95-5 - Undergraduate Curriculum Revisions - Science
    It was agreed that the items contained in the covering motion on Paper S.95-5
    be considered individually.
    S.95-5a - Department of Biological Sciences
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by C. Jones
    S

    S.M. 09/01/95
    Page 5
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors the curriculum revisions for the Faculty of Science as
    set forth in S.95-5a - Department of Biological Sciences"
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    S.95-5b - Department of Mathematics and Statistics
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by C. Jones
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors the curriculum revisions for the Faculty of Science as
    set forth in S.95-5b - Department of Mathematics and Statistics"
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    S.95-5c - Department of Physics
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by C. Jones
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors the curriculum revisions for the Faculty of Science as
    set forth in S.95-5c - Department of Physics"
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    S.95-5d - Earth Sciences Program
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by C. Jones
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors the curriculum revisions for the Faculty of Science as
    set forth in S.95-5d - Earth Sciences Program, including new
    courses EASC 101,102,201,202,203,204,205,206"
    Dr. M. Roberts, Director of the Earth Sciences Program, was in attendance in
    order to respond to questions.
    Senate was informed that the Earth Sciences program was approved by
    Senate and the Board of Governors in 1988. At that time the overall program
    structure was presented in detail but the courses to be offered were listed and
    described briefly but not approved. Senate is now being asked to approve the
    100-200 level courses in order to allow implementation of the program in Fall
    1995. The 300-400 level courses will be brought forward at a later time. The
    Academic Enhancement Fund and the Faculty of Science will provide base
    funding building over a five-year time frame. The Program will be operated by a
    Steering Committee chaired by a Director of Earth Sciences.
    Opinion was expressed that there was a general perception that Earth Sciences
    • programs were declining due to a decline in mining, petroleum and coal
    activities around the world. The response was that the curriculum in this
    program emphasizes Environmental Geosciences. Concern was expressed

    S.M. 09/01/95
    Page
    that there appeared to be nothing innovative or different about the lower
    division courses in this program. It was pointed out that the core of required
    lower division courses within this program is designed to meet the professional
    requirements for certification by the Association of Professional Engineers and
    Geoscientists of British Columbia, and the innovative nature of the program is
    not apparent until the third and fourth year level.
    Discussion turned to the course offerings and concerns were expressed with
    regard to overlap between courses within the program and others offered by
    Chemistry and Physics. It was pointed out that the courses within the Earth
    Sciences program have a different thrust. For example, crystal structure is
    considered from the practical aspect of identification of minerals, whereas
    courses in Physics and Chemistry have a more theoretical approach.
    Reference was made to EASC 205 on page 16, and it was suggested that the
    prerequisite should read CHEM 118 rather than CHEM 115.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    S.95-5e - B.Sc. Program in Environmental Science
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by C. Jones
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors the curriculum revisions in the Faculty of Science as set
    forth in S.95-5e - B.Sc. Program in EnvironñiCnt Science,
    including new courses ENPL 100,200"
    ?
    .
    ?
    .
    A. Farrell, Department of Biological Sciences, was in attendance in order to
    respond to questions.'
    Senate was advised that the two new courses - ENPL 100 and 200 - are, part of
    an undergraduate program proposal in the School of Resource and
    Environmental Management to be called the Environmental Planning Program.
    That program is not yet ready to come forward but the two courses before
    Senate are integral to the proposed B.Sc. Program in Environmental Science
    and have been brought forward separately so that the B.Sc. program could
    proceed in Fall 95-3. It was further pointed out that there has been intensive
    consideration of environmental programs within the Faculty of Science, the
    Faculty of Applied Sciences, and the Faculty of Arts at the committee level with
    a view of working towards an integrated set of
    .
    undergraduate programs. It was
    hoped that all programs could be brought forward at the same time, but since
    this was not possible it was decided to bring forward the Faculty of Science
    component because it can be offered largely with existing courses.
    In response to a question on the large number of required courses, it was
    pointed out that the five streams within the program' offer students a wide
    spectrum of choice and provide an in-depth core within the Science discipline.
    In addition, they have considerable breadth built into them and, as a
    consequence, the streams are relatively rigid and highly structured.

    S.M. 09/01/95
    Page 7
    . In response to an inquiry about the course EVSC 401 referred to in the
    supporting documentation, Senate was advised that the course proposal would
    be brought forward for approval at a later date.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    iv) ?
    Paper S.95-6 - Deletion of Courses Not Offered
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by J. Osborne
    n
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors that the following courses be deleted:
    ATHL 200
    Olympic and Educational Gymnastics
    CMNS 301
    Communications Network Research Methods
    CMPT 350
    Information and Public Policy
    CMPT 483
    Parsing and Interpretation
    GERO 405
    Aging in Rural Canada
    POL 383
    Government and Politics: India
    POL 482
    Comparative Political Elites
    PSYC 435
    Sensation
    PSYC 440
    Motivation
    SA 469
    Symbol, Myth and Meaning
    SA
    477
    Southern Africa
    CHEM 005
    The Chemistry of Life"
    Senate was advised that Gerontology had originally agreed to thedeletion of
    GERO 405 because they had not been able to find a suitable instructor.
    However, a qualified individual is now available on a continuing basis to teach
    the course and they would like to retain it for offering in Summer Semester 95-2.
    Amendment moved by E. Alderson, seconded by B. Clayman
    "that GERO 405 be removed from the list of courses for deletion"
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    AMENDMENT CARRIED
    Brief discussion took place with respect to the criteria and procedures followed
    with respect to the deletion of courses under this regulation.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED
    c) ?
    Senate Committee on Academic Planning/Senate Committee on
    ?
    Continuing Studies
    i)
    ?
    Paper S.95-7 - Non-Credit Post Baccalaureate Certificate Program in
    Employment Communication Skills
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by J. Blaney

    S.M. 09/01/95.
    Page 8
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors the proposed non-credit post-baccalaureate Certificate
    Program in Employment Communication Skills"
    ?
    ..
    J. Cullen, Continuing Studies, was in attendance to respond to questions.
    In response to an inquiry about the possibility of offering this program in line
    with other Continuing Studies offerings as evening or part-time options, Senate
    was advised that although it would take quite some time to complete the
    required 140 contact hours on a part-time/weekend basis, there was no reason
    why it could not be done that way.
    Reference was made to the budgetary implications on page 5, and Senate was
    advised that the program will operate on a cost recovery basis. Based on 50
    students per course, fees are expected to be at least $1,000 to cover the cost of
    salaries and overhead. Request has been made to Employment Canada for
    bursary assistance and expectations are reasonably optimistic that some form
    of bursary help will be available.
    Reference was made to the component on technological skills and concern was
    expressed that students graduating from University would not already possess
    these skills. Senate was advised that this component has .a very wide range of
    skills in terms of students and exemptions will be considered for those not
    needing this component.
    Opinion was expressed that the title of the Certificate seemed to imply
    ,
    a much
    narrower program than the contents of the program actually indicate, and
    Senate was informed that the title may be modified prior to implementation.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    d), ?
    Senate Committee on International Activities
    ? .
    i) ?
    Paper S.95-8 - Annual Report - SCINIUSEC - For Information
    Clarification was requested with respect to the Development Education
    component in the Eastern Indonesia University Development Project. Senate
    was advised that it essentially brings into the project components that deal with
    environmental and social development, broadens the science-based focus of
    the project, and attempts to make the project more instrumental in the
    development of Indonesia along sustainable lines. The addition of this
    component was instrumental in the positive recommendation of Phase II and
    the Committee expects to receive regular reports on the implementation of this
    component. A considerable report has already been received and is available
    to Senators. Reference was made to the issue of human rights in Indonesia
    and inquiry was made as to the University's position on this matter. Senate wasP
    advised that the Committee felt the effect of the project on the human rights
    situation would be considerably more positive if the project continued than if it

    S.M. 09/01/95
    Page 9
    • did not continue, and the Committee is satisfied that the guidelines for
    international activities which were approved by Senate are being adhered to
    within the project.
    Senate was advised that further study has led to the conclusion that a branch
    campus in Malaysia is not feasible at this time.
    Senate was advised that the number of students placed in other universities
    under the exchange agreement is roughly equal to number of students
    attending SFU.
    Discussion turned to Item #3 and concern was expressed about final approval
    of the Kenya Field School being made at the last minute, thus making it difficult
    for departments to schedule on-campus courses and teaching assignments a
    year in advance because of the possible off-campus involvement of faculty
    members. Senate was advised that provided certain conditions are met, the
    next Kenya Field School is tentatively scheduled for Spring Semester 1996-1,
    and as soon as a final report on the 1994 Field School and a proposal for 1996
    have been submitted, final decision can be made.
    ?
    6. ?
    Other Business
    There was no other business.
    ?
    7. ?
    Information
    The date of the next regularly scheduled meeting of Senate is Monday,
    February 13, 1995.
    The Assembly moved directly into Closed Session at 8:45 p.m.
    W.R. Heath
    Secretary of Senate
    9

    Back to top