?
    '":•' ?
    :., .
    . ?
    DRAFT UNTIL APPROVED BY SENATE
    MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE SENATE OF SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY HELD
    ?
    ON MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 1993 KLAUS RIECKHOFF HALL, 7:00 P.M.
    ?
    OPEN SESSION ?
    ••.
    Present:
    ?
    Stubbs, J.O., Chair
    Alderson, E.
    Absent:
    ?
    Cavers, J.
    Amason, K.
    D'Auria, J.
    Bacani, J.
    Dunsterville, V.
    Barrow, R.
    Giften, K.
    Beattie, S.
    Ingram, E.
    Blaney, J.
    McKeown, B.
    Boland,
    L
    Wideen, M.
    Bowman, M.
    Bullock, D.
    Carlson, A.
    Chunn, D.
    Ciria, A.
    -
    ?
    -
    ?
    -
    ?
    -
    ?
    -
    ?
    -
    ?
    -
    Clayman, B.
    Crawford, C.
    In attendance: Perry, T.
    Dhir, A.
    Ward, R.
    Dill, L.
    Dobb, T.
    Driver, J.
    Eaton, C.
    Etherington, L
    Hater, L
    Heinrich, K.
    Hoeflich, K.
    Hoegg, J.L.
    Irwin, J.C.
    Jahn, R.
    Jespersen, J.
    LeMare, L.
    Lord, T.
    • ?
    • ?
    Luk, W.S.
    Marteniuk, R.
    Mauser, G.
    McAskill, I.
    McDermid, G.
    • ?
    Mezei, K.
    Morrison, T.
    Munro, J.
    Osborne, J.
    Palmer, E.
    Palmer,
    L
    Percival, P.
    Pinfield, L.
    Segal, J.
    Smart, C. (representing S. Shapiro)
    Soheili, A.
    Stewart, M.L.
    Swartz, N.
    Wade, S.
    Waite, K.
    Warsh, M.
    Wickstrom, N.
    Winne, P.
    Wotherspoon, A.
    Heath, W.R., Secretary
    Grant, B., Recording Secretary
    .
    ti

    S.M.
    20/09/93
    Page
    2
    1.
    On behalf of Senate, the Chair welcomed Dr. Joseph Segal, Chancellor, Dr. C.
    Crawford, Faculty Senator, and M. Warsh, Order- In-Coucil Appointment to the
    Senate.
    APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
    The Agenda was approved as distributed.
    The
    Minutes
    tvL1
    :
    I1
    .
    1i
    .
    xL :
    I
    .
    w.i
    distributed. .
    :1IEil l
    i)
    Senate Committee Reports
    In response to an inquiry as to when Senate might receive repprts from
    the Senate Committee on International Students and the Senate. Committee on
    Instructional Methods and Organization, Senate was advised that both reports
    are currently under consideration by the Senate Committee on Academic
    Planning and will be forwarded to Senate in due course.
    ii)
    Final Exam Scheduling
    In response to an inquiry about the status of a proposal of the Senate
    Committee on Undergraduate Studies regarding final exam scheduling, Senate
    was advised that plans are underway to implement recommendations of a report
    from Professor Cameron, Computing Science which sets up exams based on the
    time classes are scheduled. Implementation is expected to take place for
    Summer semester 94-2.
    iii)
    Harassment
    Reference was made to the questions raised on page 5 regarding
    procedures set up to deal with the issue of sexual harassment in the external
    review report of the Department of Psychology, and inquiry was
    -
    made as to
    whether these issues had received further consideration and it the procedures
    had been made available to other departments. Senate was advised that the
    Senate Committee on Academic Planning had considered,
    and approve
    "
    in-
    principle, a draft paper on this subject. 'Some of the recommendat
    i
    ons will be
    forwarded directly to the President, while others will be seen in revisions to the
    external review guidelines which will come forward for SOAP and Senate
    consideration. Referring specifically to the action taken by the Department of
    Psychology, Senate was advised that the Harassment Coordinator is offering
    similar workshops to all departments who have requested them.
    iv)
    Library Hours
    A motion by R. Jahn to reconsider the decision of Senate with regard to
    the issue of library hours was deemed to be out of order.
    v)
    Annual Report -SPCSAB
    Referring to the question raised on page 6 concerning the discrepancy
    between the number of awards (150) and the number of students (170), Senate

    S.M.
    20/09/93
    Page 3
    ?
    was advised that 150 students received awards, and there were applicants from
    170 schools.
    4.
    REPORT OF THE CHAIR
    The Chair expressed his pleasure at being a part of Simon Fraser University and
    stated that he looked forward to meeting with, and getting to know, members of
    the Senate and the University community in general. He spoke on what he
    perceived to be the role of Senate and that he was honored to be Chair.
    Referring to recent changes within the Government, the Chair advised that
    universities now fall under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Skills, Training and
    Labour. Although concern has been expressed over the deletion of any
    reference to advanced education, he felt it was important not to pre-judge the
    immediate impact of this change. He was pleased to report that the new
    Minister, Dan Miller, had contacted him shortly after his appointment and he was
    quite appreciative of Mr. Millers willingness to discuss matters.
    He went on to express opinion that universities, in general, have not been
    particularly successful at persuading the broader public and ultimately
    representatives in government that their work is important and valuable, and he
    felt that one of the major and central undertakings for the 1990's will be to raise
    public awareness and public support for higher education. He felt Senate should
    be part of this process and encouraged everyone to take advantage of whatever
    opportunity they could to promote a better understanding of the University.
    5.
    REPORT OF COMMITTEES
    a)
    ?
    SENATE NOMINATING COMMITTEE
    I) ?
    Paper S.93-45 - Elections
    The following are the results of elections conducted at Senate for
    membership on the following Senate committees:
    ENATE COMMITTEE ON ACADEMIC DISCIPLINE (SCAD
    One Senator (at-large)
    to replace L. Pinfield, as Chair, for one-year term of
    office, from October 1, 1993 to September 30, 1994.
    Candidates: L. Pinfield, A. Wotherspoon
    Elected: ?
    Larry Pinfield
    One Faculty Member and One Faculty Member Alternate
    to replace G.
    Mauser and J. Brockman for terms of office, from October 1, 1993 to September
    30, 1995, and October 1, 1993 to September 30, 1994 respectively.
    Elected by acclamation: C. Dean (Regular)
    L. Dill (Alternate)

    r
    S.M. 20/09/93
    Page 4
    Three Senators (at-large)
    to replace A. Blackman, K. Heinrich, and M. Bowman
    for two-year terms of office, from October 1, 1993 to September 30, 1995.
    Candidates: J. Driver, L. Ethenngton, K. Heinrich, L. Hater, L. Palmer, P. Winne
    Elected: ?
    Jon Driver
    Kathy Heinrich
    Philip Winne
    One Lay Senator to
    replace I. McAskill for two-year term of office, from October
    1, 1993 to September 30, 1995.
    Elected by acclamation: Ian McAskill
    One Student Senator
    to replace T. Morrison for two-year term of office, from
    October 1, 1993 to September 30, 1995.
    Candidates: J. Bacani, D. Bullock, T. Lord
    Elected:
    ?
    Julinor Bacani
    SENATE COMMITTEE ON AGENDA AND RULES (SCAR)
    One Senator (at-large)
    to replace E. Ingram for two-year term of office, from
    October 1, 1993 to September 30, 1995.
    Candidates: L. Dill, E. Ingram, L. Palmer, P. Percival
    Elected:
    ?
    Paul Percival
    One Student Senator
    to replace T. Morrison for two-year term of office, from
    October 1, 1993 to September 30, 1995.
    Candidates: J. Bacani, K. Hoeflich, T. Morrison
    Elected:
    ?
    Tim Morrison
    SENATE COMMITTEE ON CONTINUING STUDIES (SCCS)
    Two Senators (at-large)
    to replace K. Giffen and C. Mauser for two-year terms
    of office, from October 1, 1993 to-September 30, 1995.
    Candidates: A. Dhir, K. Giffen, L. Hafer, J. Jespersen, G. Mauser
    Elected:
    ?
    Ken Giffen
    Gary
    .
    Mauser
    One Lay Senator
    to replace V. Dunsterville for two-year term of office, from
    October 1, 1993 to September 30, 1995.
    Elected by acclamation: Norman Wickstrom
    .
    I
    SENATE LIBRARY COMMITTEE (SLC)
    Two Senators (at-large)
    to replace L. DIII and A. Barrow for two-year terms of
    office, from October 1, 1993 to September 30, 1995.

    S.M. 20/09/93
    Page 5
    S
    Candidates: D. Bullock, D. Chunn, J. Driver
    Elected: ?
    Dorothy Chunn
    Jon Driver
    SENATE NOMINATING COMMITTEE (SNC
    Four Senators (at-large)
    to replace A. Cina, E. Palmer, L. Etherington, and M.L.
    Stewart for one-year terms of office, from October 1, 1993 to September 30,
    1994.
    Elected by acclamation: Lois Ethenngton
    Kathy Mezei
    Evelyn Palmer
    Mary Lynn Stewart
    One Student Senator and One Student Senator Alternate
    to replace T.
    Morrison and J. Bacani for one-year terms of office, from October 1, 1993 to
    September 30, 1994.
    Candidates: J. Bacani, A. Dhir, T. Morrison
    Elected: ?
    Julinor Bacani
    Tim Morrison (Alternate)
    SENATE POLICY COMMITTEE ON SCHOLARSHIPS. AWARDS &
    BURSARIES (SPCSAB)
    . ?
    One Faculty Senator (as Chair)
    to replace A. Blackman for three-year term of
    automatically
    office, from date
    becomes
    of election
    an ex-officio
    to September
    member of
    30,
    SUAAC
    1996.
    and
    The
    SGAAC.
    Chair of SPCSAB
    Candidates: K. Heinrich, P. Percival
    Elected:
    ?
    Kathy Heinrich
    Three Faculty Members (at-large)
    to replace E. Palmer, N. Swartz, and P.
    Percival for two-year terms of office, from October 1, 1993 to September 30,
    1995.
    Candidates: D. Chunn, K. Heinrich*, K. Mezei, E. Palmer, P. Percival
    Elected:
    ?
    Kathy Mezei
    Evelyn Palmer
    Paul Percival
    *Since K. Heinrich was elected as Chair of SPCSAB, she was not eligible for a
    faculty (at-large) position.
    One Lay Senator
    to replace V. Dunsterville for two-year term of office, from
    October 1, 1993 to September 30, 1995.
    Elected by acclamation: Valerie Dunsterville

    S.M.20/09/93
    Page 6
    SENATE UNDERGRADUATE AWARDS AND ADJUDICATION COMMITTEE
    (SUACC)
    One Faculty Member (at-large)
    to replace L. Palmer for twoyear term of office,
    from October 1, 1993 to September 30, 1995.
    Candidates: L. Palmer, 0. Underhill
    ?
    Elected:
    ?
    Owen Underhill
    One Lay Senator
    to fill an existing vacancy for term of office from date of
    election to September 30, 1994.
    Elected by acclamation: Suzan Beattie
    One Faculty Member (at-large)
    to replace P. Percival for twöyëàr ferr of office,
    from October 1, 1993 to September 30, 1995.
    Candidates: A. Gina, L. Hafer, P. Percival
    ?
    Elected:
    ?
    Alberto Gina
    Two Student Senators and One Student Senator Alternate to
    replace T.
    Morrison, S. Wade, and K. Hoeflich for one-year terms of office, from October 1,
    1993 to September 30, 1994.
    In this election, the two candidates receiving the higher number of votes will fill the
    Regular positions; the candidate receiving the next highest number of votes will fill the
    Alternate position.
    Candidates: J. Bacani, D. Bullock, R. Dhir, T. Lord
    ?
    * Elected; ?
    Trevor Lord
    David Bullock
    Robin Ohm
    * Balloting resulted in the election of T. Lord as a Regular member, and in a tied vote
    between the next two candidates - D. Bullock and A. Dhir. A run-off election will
    therefore be necessary to determine the second Regular member and the Alternate
    member. This election will take place at the November 1 St meeting of Senate.
    One Undergraduate Student
    to replace A. Chandre for one-year term ofoffice,
    from October 1, 1993 to September 30, 1994.
    Elected by acclamation: Julinor Bacani

    -t
    S.M.
    20/09/93
    Page
    7
    we
    "An
    i) ?
    Paper S.93-46 - External Review - Department of Linguistics (For
    Information)
    T. Perry, Chair of the Department of Linguistics was in attendance in order to
    respond to questions.
    Senate received the External Report of the Department of Linguistics for
    information.
    T. Perry, Program Coordinator was in attendance in order to respond to
    questions.
    In response to an inquiry concerning the end results of external reviews, Senate
    was advised departments are required to prepare responses to the reviews which
    are considered by the Senate Committee on Academic Planning. Reviews are
    revisited after two years and the usual practice has been to direct six to eight of
    the most important recommendations back to the Department for a follow-up
    .
    ?
    response.
    Concern was expressed about the lack of information in this particular review
    summary. Senate was reminded that this is a very small, specialized program
    and there is not a lot of scope for recommendation. Currently departmental
    responses do not come forward to Senate. However, revisions to the external
    review guidelines are being considered and expectations are that there could be
    changes in that area. Senators were also reminded that the full report is
    available from the Secretary of Senate upon request.
    • ?
    c) ?
    SENATE COMMITTEE ON ACADEMIC PLANNING/SENATE
    ?
    COMMITTEE ON UNDERGRADUATE STUDIES
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by J. Osborne
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors, as set forth in S.93-43, the change to the tuition fee
    refund policy for undergraduate students
    Senators were given background information on the current refund policy and a
    . brief summary of how the proposed revision will operate. Examples were also
    given of how the current policy prevents students from enrolling in courses which
    appear to be full because students who are still considering their options have

    I'
    S.M.
    20/09/93
    Page 8
    not dropped courses they do not
    intend to continue. It was noted that this
    measure would not eliminate the problem entirely but it is hoped that it would
    discourage the current practice of over-enrolment and change behaviour
    patterns.
    Opinion was expressed that there may be students who are taking up spaces
    who have in fact qualified forgraduation but not applied to graduate, and inquiry
    was made if the question of imposing maximum hours on graduation was being
    looked at. Senate was advised that the SCUS would be looking at this issue this
    fall.
    It was noted that students applying for loans are required to take a full course
    load and usually do not know if their student loan has been approved until after
    the start of classes. Concern was expressed that should these students not
    receive a loan they may then have to reduce their course load and end up being
    penalized financially on top of an already bad financial situation. It was also
    suggested that there are many legitimate and valid reasons for students finally
    enrolling in fewer courses than they initially registered for, and concern was
    expressed that this proposal arbitrarily penalized students solely based on when
    the courses are dropped. It was pointed out that there is an appeal procedure in
    place to deal with such situations on an individual basis.
    In response to an inquiry about student input into the proposal, Senate was
    advised that the proposal originated in the Registration Advisory Committee and
    passed through two Senate committees, all of which have student representation
    on them.
    Opinion was expressed that the revenue generated by this revision should be
    returned to the students through scholarships and bursaries. Senate was
    informed that the proposal was not intended to raise revenue but to influence
    behaviour patterns because of the trouble students have accessing courses. Any
    additional revenue from this will go into general university revenues in the same
    manner as tuition revenue.
    Discussion turned to the proposed deadline for dropping without penalty and
    Senate was advised that one week after the last release of students to the
    telephone registration system was felt to be the most consistent with the
    objective of providing the maximum opportunity for other students to register in
    these courses. However, opinion was expressed that it seemed unfair not to
    allow students to attend at least the first class before deciding whether to drop
    because there is often a discrepancy between what appears on the course
    outline and the information given out during the first week of classes. It was
    pointed out that course descriptions are often rather generic in nature and
    suggestion was made that course descriptions should be distributed earlier and
    in more detail so that the student is more informed with regard to course
    expectations. Senate was advised that the Vice-President Academic would
    remind departments of the Senate policy with regard to course outlines. Senate
    was also assured that efforts will be made to fully publicize the deadline date so
    that students are fully aware of how long they have to drop without penalty

    S.M.
    20/09/93
    Page 9
    ??
    question.
    Since the speaker's list was now complete, the Chair ruled to move to the
    ?
    Moved by L. Palmer, seconded by A. Soheili
    "that the ruling of the Chair be challenged"
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    RULING OF THE CHAIR UPHELD
    A request by A. Jahn to have a recorded vote on the main motion was rejected
    as being contrary to the Rules of Senate.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    - -
    ?
    d) ?
    SENATE LIBRARY COMMITTEE
    i) ?
    Penalties
    Paper S.93-49
    Appeal
    -
    Committee.
    Annual Reports
    University
    - Senate
    Libraries
    Library
    (For
    Committee.
    Information)
    ?
    Libraly
    ?
    time
    decision
    space
    external
    library
    In reply
    before
    for
    space
    to
    made
    review,
    the
    a concern
    the
    Library
    which
    by
    Library
    Senate
    Facilities
    appeared
    about
    in the
    can
    was
    Management
    having
    capital
    be
    advised
    to
    expanded
    be
    an
    plan.
    similar
    external
    that
    in
    Since
    relation
    the
    to
    this
    the
    consultant
    it
    hiring
    is
    may
    to
    one
    probably
    plans
    of
    have
    done
    the
    do
    to
    been
    going
    provide
    at
    consultant
    another
    the
    somewhat
    to
    time
    expansion
    report
    be
    of
    was
    sometheon
    a
    ?????
    planning.
    premature but at the time there was a different outlook with respect to capital
    Concern was expressed that 59% of the total increase in acquisitions went to
    serials in the Faculty of Science and the question was raised as to whether any
    plans were underway to rectify this situation. Senate was informed that the
    measure that the SenatLibrary Committee has undertaken is to direct the
    reduction in expenditure at high cost journals where the alternative of document
    delivery service is available. However, it was pointed out that the industry itself is
    becoming increasingly monopolized and, in some disciplines, has formed a very
    close cartel that exercises a lot of market power with the result that this has
    become a very serious problem for all universities.
    Reference was made to the future plans listed on page 4, and Senators were
    encouraged to watch for the implementation of the new system of library liaison
    assignments and encouraged to make use of this development. Some
    departments have already been approached in this regard and have found this
    general.
    contact to be very useful and informative of new developments in the Library in
    9
    ?
    procedures.
    Brief discussion also took place with respect to changes in reserve and recall

    £iM.20/09I93
    Page 1.0
    j)
    ?
    Paper S.93-50 - Annual Financial Statement (For Information)
    A. Ward, Vice-President Finance was in attendance in order to 1respond
    10
    questions.
    In reply to an inquiry as to why Senators were requested to return statements,
    Senate was advised that returned copies are sent back to Finance in order to
    minimize the cost
    ?
    ber of wasted copies as there may be some
    alternative uses for them.
    Suggestion was made that if the document were made available on the campus
    wide information service those interested in reviewing the information from year
    to year would be able to do so without keeping an annual copy. A. Ward agreed
    this was a possibility and that he would look into it.
    Reference was made to page 16 and an inquiry was made as to why information
    with respect to SF Univentures was not considered material to the report. Senate
    was advised that a separate financial statement for SF Univentures is reported
    on by the Auditor General and was not considered material as the total value is
    very, very small. Brief discussion followed.
    7.
    ?
    INFORMATION
    Senate was advised that no agenda items had been received for the meeting of
    Senate scheduled for October 4th and therefore the meeting was cancelled. The
    date of the next regularly scheduled meeting of Senate is Monday, November 1,
    1993.
    The Assembly recessed briefly at :50 p.m. prior to moving into Closed Session.
    W.R. Heath
    Secretary of Senate

    Back to top