'
    ?
    p..
    S
    DRAFT UNTIL APPROVED BY SENATE
    MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE SENATE OF SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY HELD ON MONDAY,
    ?
    FEBRUARY 8, 1993 KLAUS RIECKHOFF HALL, 7:00 P.M.
    OPEN SESSION
    Present: ?
    Saywell, W.G., Chair
    Alderson, E.
    Barrow, R.
    Bawa, M.
    Beattie, S.
    Blackman, A.
    Blaney, J.
    Boland, L.
    Bowman, M.
    Carlson, R.
    Cavers, J.
    Ciria, A.
    Clayman, B.
    D'Auria, J.
    Dawson, J.
    Dill, L.
    Dobb,T.
    Etherington, L.
    Evenden, L.
    Fickling, D.
    Green, C.
    Heinrich, K.
    Hoeflich, K.
    Hoegg, J.L.
    Hotter, A.
    Jones, C.
    Leiss, W.
    Lim, K.
    Mauser, G.
    Menzies, R.
    Morrison, T.
    Munro, J.
    Nielsen, V.
    Osborne, J.
    Palmer, E.
    Palmer, L.
    Percival, P.
    Pint ield, L.
    Rae, B.
    Rieckhoff, K.
    Shannon, 0.
    Shapiro, S.
    Stewart, M.L.
    Thomson, K.
    Wade, S.
    Winne, P.
    Heath, W.R., Secretary
    Grant, B., Recording Secretary
    Absent: Cohen, M.
    Covell, M.
    Driver, J.
    Gitfen, K.
    Gray, P.
    Luk, W.S.
    Marteniuk, A.
    McKeown, B.
    Plommer, T.
    Smith, S.
    Walker, R.
    Warsh, M.
    Wotherspoon, A.
    0

    q ?
    '
    S.M. 08/02/93
    Page
    1.
    Approval of the Agenda
    The Agenda was approved as distributed.
    2.
    Approval of the Minutes of the Open Session of January 11. 1993
    The Minutes were approved as distributed.
    K
    Referring to page 4, reference was made to the first paragraph dealing with an
    alleged discrepancy between a statement in the current Calendar concerning the
    status of changes to rules and regulations with regard to currently registered
    students and a previous regulation passed by Senate in this regard. It was
    agreed that the matter would be reviewed with a report back to Senate.
    4.
    ?
    Report of the Chair
    I) 1993/94 Budget
    In an attempt to clarify the Premier's recent announcement about an increase
    of 3% to post-secondary education, Senate was advised that the 3% was
    slated for enrolment growth only. It is believed that the three established
    universities will receive very little of that increase as expectations are that a
    significant portion will be allocated to UNBC and University-Colleges. The
    actual change to the operating grant is expected to be very close to zero,
    perhaps no change from last year, which in fact represents a reduction in
    terms of real dollars because of the effects of inflation. It had been hoped that
    written confirmation of exact figures would be forthcoming in sufficient time
    before the beginning of the fiscal year so that planning could take place with
    precise numbers rather than estimates but nothing definitive has yet been
    received. The university- administration is working diligently to determine
    ways in which the budget question can be addressed but recommendations
    have yet to be finalized.
    ii) Since this was his last Senate meeting, W. Saywell wished to reflect on the
    university as he leaves it. Speaking on matters he believed to be positive
    changes to SFU, the Chair made reference to the quality of the staff,
    students, faculty and Alumni of SFU and how the university had matured and
    received recognition over the years. He believed that the concept of life-long
    learning is increasingly becoming a major issue for higher education and he
    felt SFU has reacted better than most institutions to this pressure through its
    innovative programming and very successful co-op program. Despite lack of
    resources, he felt SFU had done its best to remain accessible, and in fact had
    gone the extra step, in initiatives such as the Alaska Highway Project or the
    Harbour Centre campus within the city core, with both projects offering
    accessibility to special groups beyond the immediate campus. He was also
    very pleased to see the way the Alumni Association had developed. They
    now had Chapters around the world and were in a position to make major
    contributions, especially in the area of student financial aid and, more
    recently, the library endowment fund which has been targeted as another

    S.M. 08/02/93
    Page
    • area of interest. Reference was made to the success of the first national
    fundraising campaign which had raised approximately sixty-five million dollars
    for the University and had helped to fund endowed chairs, faculty
    appointments, new buildings, and the purchase of equipment throughout the
    • university He felt SFU had become a more international university in terms of
    outlook and involvement overseas with quite successful student exchange
    programs. While he acknowledged the down side of the rapid growth
    experienced by the University, he stressed that it had provided the only
    opportunity to get additional resources to hire new faculty which he felt was
    extremely important to a community of scholars and students. He was
    pleased to report that attempts to change the gender balance of faculty had
    resulted in 40% of the new appointments being women. In closing, W.
    Saywell wished to thank everyone associated with the Senate for their
    collegiality and support, and he wished theuniversity good fortune.
    5. ?
    Report of Committees
    -
    mie
    0017
    117 1i=
    Senate was advised that Student Senators Flores and Haje had failed to meet
    eligibility requirements to remain on Senate and that a by-election to fill their
    positions will be conducted.
    . ?
    The following are the results of elections conducted at Senate to the
    undernoted committees:
    Senate Committee on Continuing Studies
    One Faculty Senator to replace N. Cercone for balance term of office, from
    date of election to September 30, 1993.
    Elected by acclamation: ?
    J. Cavers
    International Underaraduate Student Exchanae Commi
    (Sub-Committee of the Senate Committee on International Activities)
    Three Faculty Members elected by Senate for term of office from date of
    election to September 30, 1994.
    Elected by acclamation: ?
    P. McFetridge
    K.S. Viswanathan
    J. Zaslove
    One Undergraduate Student elected by Senate for term of office from date of
    election to September 30,d 1993.
    Candidates:
    ?
    A. Chande, S. Smith
    Individual receiving the higher number
    of votes and declared elected: ?
    A. Chande

    S.M. 08/02/93
    Page
    • ?
    Committee
    P
    aper
    S.
    9
    3-1
    ?
    Lib
    rajy
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by S. Wade
    "that Senate approve in principle the proposal concerning Library
    resources for new courses and programs as set forth in S.93-1 1"
    Concern was expressed about the wording 'in principle' and clarification was
    requested as to its meaning. Senate was advised that the wording had been
    used because it was not certain that Senate had the power to determine or
    establish budget procedures but J. Munro indicated, for the record, that it was
    his intention to ensure that the recommendations as outlined in the proposal
    were followed.
    Question was called on the main motion,
    and a vote taken. ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    c) Senate Committee on Agenda and Rules
    i) Paper S.93-9 - Revision to the Rules of Senate. Section ll.A - Officers -
    Election of Vice-Chair
    Moved by K. Rieckhoff, seconded by S. Wade
    "that the Rules of Senate, Section Il, Officers, A. Chair, be changed
    from: Chair: The Chair of Senate is empowered and expected to
    take actions he/she deems necessary to ensure the orderly
    advancement of the legitimate business of Senate. In case the
    President is unable to chair a meeting of Senate, the Academic
    Vice-President will take the Chair.
    to: Chair: The Chair of Senate is empowered and expected to take
    the actions he/she deems necessary to ensure the orderly
    advancement of the legitimate business of the Senate. The Vice-
    Chair shall be elected annually by and from the members of
    Senate, and shall sit as a member of the Senate Committee on
    Agenda and Rules. In no case shall a Vice-Chair serve more than
    two consecutive terms."
    Question was called, and a vote taken. ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    Senate was advised that the report before Senate resulted from previous
    concerns that a notice of motion was taking two meetings to reach the floor of
    Senate and SCAR had been requested to review its procedures and report back.
    The proposal now before Senate sets out proposed guidelines for the operation
    of SCAR in determining agenda items for Senate, and offers an opportunity to
    speed the process up as well as a way of apprising Senate of SCAR's decisions.

    S.M. 08/02/93
    . I
    ?
    Page 5
    Concern was expressed that the proposal appears to eliminate the opportunity to
    present a notice of motion and further gives to SCAR the power to determine
    whether or not a motion reaches the floor of Senate. It was pointed out that
    SCAR has the authority to determine the Senate agenda but that a motion to
    suspend the rules, if successful would allow for discussion of an item at a Senate
    meeting. In addition, the proposal would apprise Senate of the actions taken by
    SCAR, thereby being more accountable than under the current process.
    In response to an inquiry as to the procedural steps necessary to require SCAR
    to follow different procedures, Senate was advised that the current terms of
    reference for SCAR only specify that SCAR should set the agenda for Senate;
    they do not specify how to go about this. The proposal before Senate is an
    explanation from SCAR of how it intends to operate in this regard. If Senate
    does not agree with the procedures, it was suggested that perhaps the most
    effective way to deal with it is to amend the terms of reference to include specific
    recommendations. However, it was reiterated that the proposal before Senate
    increases the accessibility of the Senate agenda and is a much more open way
    of apprising Senate of what SCAR is doing.
    Suggestion was made that Senate provide SCAR with an opportunity to see how
    the revised procedures work, and if concerns were still present thereafter they
    could be brought forward at a subsequent meeting.
    6.
    OTHER BUSINESS
    On behalf of Senate, K. Rieckhoff unanimously expressed Senate's appreciation
    to President Saywell as Chair of Senate and wished him very happy and
    successful prospects for the future.
    On behalf of the Student Senators, D. Fickling and S. Wade presented a small
    token of their appreciation to President Saywell as Chair of Senate.
    7.
    INFORMATION
    The date of the next regularly scheduled meeting of Senate is Monday, March 1,
    1993.
    The Assembly moved directly into Closed Session at 7:35 p.m.
    W. R. Heath
    Secretary of Senate
    0

    Back to top