S
    DRAFT UNTIL APPROVED BY SENATE
    MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE SENATE OF SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY HELD ON MONDAY,
    ?
    APRIL 6, 1992 KLAUS RIECKHOFF HALL, 7:00 P.M.
    .
    OPEN SESSION
    Present:
    ?
    Saywell, W.G., Chair
    Barrow, A.
    Absent: ?
    Bawa, M.
    Blackman, R.
    Beattie, S.
    Blaney, J.
    Cercone, N.
    Boland, L.
    Choquer, K.
    Bowman, M.
    D'AUIia, J.
    Brown, A.
    Evenden, L.
    Bukovac, S.
    Gray, P.
    Carlson, R.
    Leiss, W.
    Covell, M.
    Menzies, R.
    Dill, L.
    Morrison, T.
    Dobb,T.
    Etherington, L.
    Nielsen, V.
    Gee, E.
    Saunders, A.
    Giffen, K.
    Soheili, A.
    Haje,P.
    Swartz, N.
    Heinrich, K.
    Toohey, K.
    Hoegg, J.L.
    Warsh, M.
    Hotter, A.
    Winne, P.
    Jones, C.
    Wotherspoon, A.
    Lim, K.
    Luk, W.S.
    Marteniuk, R.
    Mauser, G.
    McKeown, B.
    In attendance:
    Munro, J.
    ?
    -Jkl,I.
    A. Barton
    Northcott, P.
    J. Nance
    Palmer, E.
    S. Montgomery
    Palmer, L.
    Percival, P.
    Pint ield, L.
    Rae, B.
    Reilly, N.
    Rieckhoft, K.
    Shannon, D.
    Shapiro, S.
    Smith, S.
    Stewart, M.L.
    Thomson, K.
    Verdun-Jones, S.
    Wade, S.
    Walker, R.
    Heath, W.R., Secretary
    Grant, B., Recording Secretary
    S

    S.M. 06/04/92
    Page 2
    1.
    APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
    The Agenda was approved as distributed.
    2.
    APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE OPEN SESSION OF MARCH 2. 1992
    The Minutes were approved as distributed.
    Ec.
    i)
    Referring to the motion at the bottom of page 3 with respect to FTE
    enrolment targets, Senate was advised that it is now believed that SFU's Access
    enrolment target will increase by 200 rather than the originally anticipated 500
    FTEs which will result in a target of minus 170 FTEs for 1992-93.
    ii)
    Reference was made to Item 6 (ii) under Other Business on Page 7, and
    in response to an inquiry about the name of the Chair of the Senate Committee
    on International Students, Senate was advised that the Vice-President, Academic
    had designated S. Shapiro. An objection to this appointment was ruled out of
    order by the Chair.
    iii)
    In response to an inquiry about information pertaining to degree
    completion times for students in the Engineering Science program, it was noted
    that this information had been provided to Senate at its last meeting.
    ;1.it.1IL1I;
    i)
    AppointmentsOn
    behalf of Senate,
    ?
    the Chair extended congratulations for the following
    0
    appointments: E. Gee, Acting Dean of Graduate Studies until the end of August
    1992; A. Barrow, Dean of the Faculty of Education; and K. Heinrich who has
    been appointed to the governing council of the University of Northern B.C.
    ii)
    Elections - Paper S.92-29
    Senate's attention was drawn to paper S.92-29 which was distributed prior
    to the meeting for information with respect to the results of recent elections to
    Senate and the Board of Governors.
    iii)
    Budget
    Senate was advised that the basic thrust of the budget was no surprise
    and in fact the University had been planning for a difficult budget. However the
    University had not anticipated such a reduction on the revenue side. The Chair
    explained that close to two million dollars had been lost over what had been
    expected due to such things as a major reduction in the University's equipment
    budget, a freeze on tuition fees which included all students except foreign
    students, and a significant reduction in Access Program funding at both the
    undergraduate and graduate levels. When all of these things are taken into
    consideration along with increases in obligatory costs such UIC payments, CPP
    payments, utility increases, negotiated agreements relating to pension plan,
    TSSU workload and the traditional progression through the ranks for faculty and
    administrative personnel, it is expected that the University will have to deal with a

    S.M. 06/04/92
    Page 3
    projected deficit of approximately four million dollars. Provincial law does not
    . permit universities to run a deficit so efforts must be made to reduce the
    University's total expenditure. This was the reason for the communication
    recently sent to the university community announcing a freeze on all
    appointments. In addition, consultations are underway with the Deans and
    Chairs of Departments to seek their advice, and a meeting between the President
    and the Senate Committee on University Budget has been scheduled. It is
    hoped that a budget will be available to present to the Board of Governors at its
    next meeting.
    At the request of the Senate Policy Committee on Scholarships, Awards and
    Bursaries, R. Blackman, as Chair was asked to bring to Senate's attention the
    Committee's concern about the budget for scholarships and awards. Senate had
    no objection to A. Blackman's request to present the following statement from the
    Committee to Senate for consideration:
    "This Committee urges the administration to give financial aid and
    awards the highest priority when establishing the 92-93 operating
    budget. We recognize that all components in the university budget
    are vulnerable in this time of financial exigency however we feel it is
    particularly important to protect those components that serve to
    reward the very best students and to support those most in need."
    Senate was invited to show its support for the statement and responded by
    enthusiastic clapping on the table.
    • In response to an inquiry to the Vice-President Academic as to what his priorities
    will be in arriving at the distribution of funds under his control, J. Munro advised
    that in a period of serious financial restraints his overriding priorities are not to
    damage the programs of students, particularly undergraduate students that are
    pursuing degrees, and not to damage the excellence in research that the
    University has achieved over the years.
    a)
    The following are the results of elections to the Senate Committee on
    Instructional Methods and Organization (SCIMO):
    Four Faculty members elected by Senate for no specified term of office.
    Candidates: L. Boland, P. Coleman, C. Day, M. Dubiel, N. Dyck, J. Jones, J.
    Ogloff, L. Palmer, G. Poole, G. Strate, L. Weldon.
    Elected:
    ?
    Peter Coleman, Leigh Palmer, Gary Poole, Grant Strate
    One Undergraduate Student
    elected by Senate for no specified term of office.
    Candidates: Z. Barabas, J. Laidley
    Initial balloting resulted in a tie vote; second balloting was required.
    Elected: ?
    Zoltan Barabas

    S.M. 06/04/92
    Page 4
    One Graduate Student
    elected by Senate for no specified term of office.
    Candidates: V.R. Black, K. Giffen ?
    0
    Elected: ?
    Ken Giffen
    In reply to a concern that all members of the Committee are male, the Chair
    indicated that he had deliberately reserved naming one of the two presidential
    appointments to the committee until after the election in case a balance issue
    arose. He advised that he would take these concerns into consideration when
    making the appointment.
    MIEL
    -g-
    11 1 1MQ0
    =11 11 ?
    If.1s,1.sIli(!:
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by S. Wade
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors as set forth in S.92-24, the change in degree
    requirements for the Master of Resource Management to allow
    students to take either MRM 642 or MRM 644 rather than
    requiring MRM 642 alone"
    Question was called, and a vote taken. ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    ii) ?
    Paper S.92-25 - Department of Psychology - Experimental Psychology
    Program - Change in M.A. degree requirements
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by R. Blackman
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors as set forth in S.92-25 the changes in the M.A. degree
    requirements in the Experimental Psychology Program"
    It was noted that the credit hours for a large number of courses had increased
    and concerns were expressed that this would result in budgetary implications and
    increase the cost of the program. Senate was advised that not all of the courses
    are given every year; in fact some of them are offered quite infrequently, and the
    increased faculty teaching load represented by this change will be significantly
    less than the equivalent of one additional faculty load per year. In response to an
    inquiry as to whether the faculty resources might not be better employed at the
    undergraduate level where courses are over-subscribed, it was noted that the
    Psychology Department already teaches a large proportion of the undergraduate
    student population and the Department felt the graduate program needed more
    attention. Senate was also advised that although the Psychology Department is
    making a relatively minor shift in teaching distribution to favour the graduate
    program, the Department feels confident that they will be able to continue to

    S.M. 06/04/92
    Page 5
    serve the undergraduate student population well and without any great increase
    in sessional instructors. Bnef discussion followed.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    3 ?
    !i1uF W1If.ji sli ?
    i1i11T]
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by S. Wade
    "that Senate approve and recommend to the Board of Governors
    the proposed agreements with the University College of the Fraser
    Valley dated 26 February 1992 covering:
    • Selection, Recruitment and Assignment of Faculty;
    • Curriculum Development, Grading and Evaluation
    • Program Administration and Monitoring"
    In response to an inquiry concerning the impact of this arrangement on the
    Library resources, it was noted that inter-library loans service would have to be
    provided and expectations are that students from the University College of the
    Fraser Valley would make some use of SFU's library resources. However, it was
    pointed out that the Provincial Government has provided a grant to cover the cost
    • of the partnership agreement and some of that grant will be allocated to the
    Library. It is anticipated that program proposals will be presented to Senate at its
    next meeting and further details will be available at that time.
    Reference was made with respect to the first two sentences in point #2 on page
    one. Opinion was expressed that these two sentences appeared to be in conflict
    with one another and request for clarification was made. It was noted that two
    stages are identified in the process; the first one is that SFU departments will
    review vitae, the second is that a joint committee will also participate in the
    review process but Senate's attention was drawn to point six on page 2 which
    specifies that final approval on the assignment of existing and new faculty to
    teach upper level courses rests with the University. It is the University's
    understanding that the joint committee would not be able to overrule a
    Department if a Department should find a candidate unsuitable. It was also
    pointed out that approval on the assignment of faculty to teach upper
    ,
    level
    courses at UCFC would be done initially and would continue indefinitely unless
    some problem developed.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    ii)
    ?
    Paper S.92-27 - Department of Archaeology - External Review (For
    Information)
    J. Nance, Chair of the Department of Archaeology, S. Montgomery,
    Undergraduate Archaeology Student Representative, and A. Barton, Graduate

    S.M. 06/04/92
    Page 6
    Student Archaeology Representative were in attendance in order to respond to
    questions.
    Reference
    ?
    was made to the comments of the reviewers with respect to
    0
    inadequate resources and opinion was expressed that this is a recurrent theme in
    all of the external reviews presented to Senate and that Senate itself must bear
    some of the responsibility for this situation.
    Concern was expressed about the issue of gender bias toward female students
    in the Department which was commented upon in the report and discussion
    turned to this issue. Senate was advised that the University Harrassment Officer
    had been invited to address this issue with faculty members in the Department
    and all members of the Department are now aware and sensitive to this issue. It
    was acknowledged by the undergraduate students that the Department had
    taken their concerns seriously and was taking steps to prevent any further difficult
    situations from occurring.
    Discussion turned briefly to the issue of sessional instructors. In response to an
    inquiry about student complaints about grading by sessional instructors, Senate
    was advised that guidelines for TAs and Sessional Instructors establishing
    standards and procedures for course structure and grading are under
    preparation.
    Senate's attention was drawn to the concerns of the undergraduate students with
    regard to the Archaeology Field School and it was pointed out that the
    Department is in the process of drafting guidelines for participation in the Field
    School and it was noted that the Department has been very responsive in
    addressing the concerns of the students in this regard.
    Further information was requested with reference to points 19, 23 and 25 on
    pages 3 and 4 of the report which dealt with course offerings and completion
    times. In response, Senate was informed that the Department felt the report was
    somewhat inaccurate in their assessment in this area. It was felt that the variety
    and diversity of courses was at issue rather than the number of courses offered;
    and it was explained that the number of faculty in the department, particularly in
    the area of physical anthropology, accounts, in part, for the lack of variety in
    courses. However, an additional faculty member will be added and hopefully the
    variety of courses will be increased.
    d) ?
    Senate Committee on Agenda and Rules
    i)
    ?
    Paper S.92-28 - Responsibilities and Terms of Appointment of Faculty
    Deans
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by S. Wade
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors, as set out in S.92-28, the Responsibilities and Terms of
    Appointment of Faculty Deans"

    S.M. 06/04/92
    Page 7
    .
    ?
    Senate was advised that the revisions essentially update documents approved in
    1970 in order to reflect the current role of Deans.
    Question was called and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    6.
    ?
    Other Business
    Concern was expressed about the gender specific language contained in the
    University Act, and inquiry was made as to why the language had not been
    changed. It was pointed out that the University Act is the responsibility of the
    Provincial Government .
    _
    flthS
    gtuU4tIH
    uuuti_W.*flt.
    The following notice of motion was received from K. Rieckhoff:
    "that Senate establish regulations which will ensure that no new
    or revised courses and programs, or offerings of existing
    courses and programs at new locations, including individual
    offerings of special topics courses, can be offered unless
    adequate library resources are in place, or funds for them
    guaranteed in the base budget of the Library"
    8.
    ?
    Information
    The date of the next regularly scheduled meeting of Senate is Monday, May 11,
    1992.
    The Assembly moved directly into Closed Session at 8:10 p.m.
    W.R. Heath
    Secretary of Senate
    0

    Back to top