S
    DRAFT UNTIL APPROVED BY SENATE
    MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE SENATE OF SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY HELD
    ON MONDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 1991 KLAUS RIECKHOFF HALL, 7:00 P.M.
    OPEN SESSION
    Present:
    Saywell, W.G., Chair
    Absent:
    Cercone, N.
    Barrow, R.
    D'Auna, J.
    Bedford, B.
    Deigrande, J.
    Blackman, R.
    DiFonzo, A.
    Blaney, J.
    Gibbons, N.
    Bowman, M.
    Mauser, G.
    Bukovac, S.
    Munro, D.
    Carlson, R.
    Pinfleld, L.
    Clayman, B.
    Rae, B.
    Covell, M.
    Strate, G.
    Dickinson, J. (replacing D. George)
    Dill, L.
    Tjosvold, D.
    Djwa,S.
    Dobb, T.
    Duguid, S.
    Ekstedt, J. (replacing R. Brown)
    In attendance:
    Evenden, L.
    Heath, N.
    Giffen, K.
    McKeown, B.
    Gray, P.
    Heinrich, K.
    Hendrickson, T.
    Hoechsmann, M.
    Hoegg, J.L.
    Jones, C.
    Leiss, W.
    Luk,
    W.S.
    Maaske, R.
    Menzies, R.
    Munro, J.
    Myers, T.
    Nielsen, V.
    Palmer, E.
    Palmer, L.
    Percival, P.
    Reilly, N.
    Rieckhoff, K.
    Saunders, R.
    Shannon, D.
    Shapiro, S.
    Stewart, M.L.
    Tuinman, J.
    Verdun-Jones, S.
    Wade, S.
    Walker, R.
    Warsh, M.
    Winne, P.
    Wotherspoon, A.
    .
    Nagel, H. Acting Secretary
    Grant, B., Recording Secretary

    S.M. 04/02/91
    Page 2
    1.
    APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
    The Agenda was approved as distributed.
    2.
    APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE OPEN SESSION OF DECEMBER 3. 1990
    The Minutes were approved as distributed.
    3.
    BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES
    There was no business arising from the Minutes
    4.
    i)
    Senate was informed that a report, prepared under the Chair's name, in response
    to the Ministry's strategic planning initiative will be presented to Senate at its next
    meeting for consideration.
    ii)
    The Chair reported that the University has received notification that controls are
    being returned for public sector wages. A letter from the Hon. M. Couvelier,
    together with the official press release, is the full extent of the information received
    at this point and copies will be forwarded to the various employee groups on
    campus.
    iii)
    The Chair was pleased to announce that capital funding has been received for the
    planning of the West Mall Complex and that the planning process was now
    underway.
    iv)
    The Chair was pleased to announce the appointment by Order-in-Council of
    Senator Deborah Shannon to the Board of Governors.
    v)
    Senate was informed that the first annual report of the Harassment Co-Ordinator
    will be released in the near future. The Policy has been effective in terms of raising
    the sensitivity of the university community to such issues and in establishing
    procedures to effectively handle complaints in this regard.
    vi)
    Congratulations were extended to J. Ekstedt, School of Criminology, who was
    instrumental in the creation of the International Centre for Criminal Law Reform and
    Criminal Justice Policy which is a joint venture between Simon Fraser University,
    Faculty of Law - University of British Columbia, and Rutgers University in the United
    States.
    vii)
    Congratulations were also extended to M.L. Stewart, Department of
    History/Women's Studies, whose recent book was ranked by the Foundation for
    Humanities as the best book published in the Humanities in Canada this year.
    viii)
    The Chair reported difficulty in receiving written confirmation from all of the
    honorary degree candidates as well as difficulty in scheduling individuals for the
    various ceremonies but he hoped to be able to make a public announcement very
    soon. However, in order to focus more attention on the Fall Convocation, separate
    announcements will be made for the June and October ceremonies.
    ix)
    In response to concerns from L. Palmer about recent changes to the parking policy,
    in particular the regulations relating to evening parking, the Chair requested that
    the concerns be submitted to his office in writing and stated that he would take the
    matter under advisement and report back.
    0

    S.M. 04/02/91
    Page 3
    llIul*1
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by R. Blackman
    "that Senate approve, as set forth in S.91-1, undergraduate
    curriculum revisions in the Faculty of Arts as follows:
    Department of Psychology - Changes to the program admission
    -
    requirernentsiorPsychologyMinor,Major-and- Honors students" --
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    i.iia35'
    lIi11i,1uIiitC11t1Th(]est]si
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by K. Rieckhoff
    "That Senate approve, as set forth in S.91-2, the following recommendations of
    SCUS (as amended by SCAP): (Note: SCAP amendments underlined)
    1.
    In order to qualify for graduation from the general degree program, a
    student must satisfy, as a minimum, both of the following requirements:
    and
    a minimum grade point average of 2.00 calculated on the basis of all
    upper division courses taken at Simon Fraser University. This grade
    point average will be calculated by dividing the total number of grade
    points earned in upper division courses by the total number of semester
    credit hours assigned for those courses, counting only the higher grade
    in courses that have been duplicated.
    2.
    In order to qualify for graduation from the honors degree program, a
    student must satisfy, as a minimum, both of the following requirements:
    and
    a minimum grade point average of 3.00 calculated on the basis of all
    upper division courses taken at Simon Fraser University. This grade
    point average will be calculated by dividing the total number of grade
    points earned in upper division courses by the total number of semester
    credit hours assigned for those courses, counting only the higher grade
    in courses that have been duplicated.
    If a student in the honors degree program has completed both the CGPA
    filld the grade point average for upper division courses at 3.50 or higher,
    the designation "First Class" will apply.
    3.
    Individual faculties and departments may, with the approval of Senate,
    maintain their own supplementary graduation requirements. Individual

    S.M. 04/02/91
    Page 4
    faculties and departments may apply to Senate for permission to
    increase the minimum grade point average required for graduation, or to
    impose additional requirements, or both.
    4.
    In keeping with the above regulation, the definition of the grade "C-" on
    page 22 of the current calendar should be revised from 'Satisfactory
    Performance' to 'Marginal Performance'.
    5.
    The upper division grade point average should appear on students'
    transcripts in a running manner.
    6.
    The revised minimum graduation requirements apply to all students
    entering the University commencing with the Fall 1991-3 Semester.
    Students who were registered at the University prior to the Fall 1991-3
    Semester may satisfy either the minimum graduation requirements as
    stated on page 11 of the 1990/91 Calendar, or the revised minimum
    graduation requirements as set out in S.91-2"
    In response to an inquiry about grandfathering current students, A. Blackman drew
    Senate's attention to Item 6 of the motion which explicitly addresses this issue.
    Responding to an inquiry about the effect of the proposed changes, J. Munro pointed out
    that at the present time graduation CGPA is not calculated until students apply for
    graduation. If the proposed regulation is approved, a running entry will appear on student
    transcripts so they will know exactly where they stand with respect to this requirement.
    The regulation will also establish a consistent university-wide calculation for the
    grConcaduaertn ion
    waCs
    PeAxpr.
    essed that the proposal as it was originally motivated by departmental
    9
    curriculum committees had been radically transformed by SCUS and SCAP and opinion
    was expressed that this represented a departure from the spirit of the original proposal.
    In response to an inquiry concerning the C- designation, R. Blackman indicated that the
    committee felt that since it was not possible to obtain a degree with only C- grades, C-
    should not be described as it currently appears in the Calendar as 'satisfactory
    performance' and therefore the committee recommended C- be described as 'marginal
    performance'.
    Inquiry was made as to the need for changing the current regulation and, in response, it
    was pointed out that it was now possible for a student to graduate with less than 2.00
    grade point average which was lower than the current maintenance standard. Although
    this did not happen frequently the Committee felt it should be corrected. Opinion was also
    expressed that this proposal places greater weight on upper level course work which is
    where the emphasis for graduation should be.
    It was pointed out that under current conditions of academic probation, and if the
    proposed regulations are approved, students will be able to continue with a cummulative
    grade point average below 2.00, complete their graduation requirements provided that
    their grade point average in a review period is higher than 2.00, and at the end of their
    studies not be eligible for a degree . Request was made that the Senate Undergraduate
    Admissions Board review the condition of academic probation. The Chair advised that
    the request will be noted and taken under advisement.

    S.M.
    04/02/91
    Page 5
    0
    Moved by B. Bedford, seconded by T. Hendrickson
    "that the motion be referred back to the Senate Committee on
    Academic Planning and the Senate Committee on Undergraduate
    Studies for further discussion"
    Opinion was expressed that there appeared to have been little discussion between
    SCUS and SCAP regarding the impact of the changes and it would have been more
    democratic to refer the committee amendments back down to the curriculum committees
    for consideration.
    Question was called on the motion to refer,
    and a vote taken.
    MOTION TO REFER FAILED
    -
    Question was called on the main motion,
    and a vote taken.
    MAIN MOTION CARRIED
    ii)
    Senate Committee on Academic Planning/Senate Graduate Studies Committee
    a)
    Paper S.91-3 - Change to Graduate Studies General Regulation 1.9.5 re Ph.D.
    External Examiners
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by B. Clayman
    "that Senate approve changes to the Graduate Studies General
    Regulation 1.9.5 regarding Ph.D. External Examiners, as set out in
    S.91-3"
    As a point of clarification, B. Clayman indicated the intent was that students would not be
    made aware of the exact question the examiner wished to pose at the defense but there
    was no prohibition against informing students of the general nature of any concern the
    examiner might have.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    b)
    Paper S.91-4 - Graduate curriculum revisions - Faculty of Applied Sciences
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by B. Clayman
    • "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the
    Board of Governors, as set forth in S.91-4 curriculum
    revisions in the Faculty of Applied Sciences as follows:
    Natural Resource Management Program -
    - Change to description of program
    .
    - Change to degree requirements re credit hours and
    elective courses
    - New course - MRM 658-5
    - Change of title and description - MRM 650-5
    - Change of description and addition of prerequisite -
    • MRM 670-5

    S.M. 04/02/91
    Page 6
    - Change of title - MRM 615-5"
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    fl'lL1i
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by B. Clayman
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors, as set forth in S.91-5, curriculum revisions in the
    Faculty of Arts as follows:
    i)
    S.91-5a
    School of Criminology
    ii)
    S.91-5b
    Department of Economics
    iii)
    S.91-5c
    Department of Geography
    iv)
    S.91-5d
    Department of Linguistics
    v)
    S.91-5e
    Department of Political Science"
    Referring to S.91-5, a suggestion to amend section (c) of the proposed modifications to
    read 'at least twenty-one (21) hours selected from additional graduate curriculum
    offerings' was accepted as a friendly amendment. Referring to S.91-5e concern was
    expressed about possible overlap between the proposed new course POL 855 with
    courses in existence in the Department of Communication. B. Clayman pointed out that
    representatives from both Departments were present at the various levels when
    committees approved this course and this issue had not been raised.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    d)
    Paper S.91-6 - Graduate curriculum revisions - Faculty of Business Administration
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by B. Clayman
    "that Senate approve and recommend apprOval to the Board of
    Governors, as set forth in S.91-6, curriculum revisions in the
    Faculty of Business Administration as follows:
    - New courses - MBA 660-5, MBA 661-5, MBA 662-5,
    MBA 663-5
    - Change of title - MBA 607-5, MBA 681-5, MBA 691-5"
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    e)
    Paper S.91-7 Graduate curriculum revisions - Faculty of Education
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by B. Clayman
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors, as set forth in S.91-7, curriculum revisions in the
    Faculty of Education as follows:
    - Revision to PhD Supervisory Committee
    - Revision to requirements re Comprehensive Examinations in
    is
    the Curriculum Theory and Implementation PhD Program
    - Revision to Comprehensive Examination Committee for the

    S.M. 04/02/91
    Page 7
    [1
    C
    Curriculum Theory and Implementation PhD Program
    New Course - EDUC 863-5
    Revision to list of core courses in the Counselling Psychology
    Program"
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED.
    1)
    Paper S.91-8 - Graduate curriculum revisions - Faculty of Science
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by C. Jones
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors, as set forth in S.91-8, curriculum revisions in the
    Faculty of Science as follows:
    i)
    S918a DepartmentoLBio log icaLSciences
    --
    - -
    ii)
    S.91-8b
    Department of Mathematics and Statistics"
    Clarification was requested with regard to the explanation that some of the new courses in
    Biological Sciences were instituted in response to the external review of the Department
    since Item 3.9 of the Review indicates that the number and diversity of courses should be
    reduced. C. Jones explained that by introducing these special topic courses, the
    Department hoped to provide an appropriate array of courses to allow students the
    opportunity to take what they want without offering a very large number of courses.
    In response to an inquiry concerning the introduction of 900-level courses in the
    Department of Mathematics and Statistics, B. Clayman explained that graduate course
    numbers range anywhere from 500 to 900. These were not the first 900 numbers in the
    University, and he indicated he intended to look into this issue in an attempt to rationalize
    the numbering system in graduate studies. It was also pointed out that in order to keep
    some rationale for their own sequence of numbering the Department had to move to the
    900-level as the majority of numbers at the 800-level had already been used.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    The External Review Report of the Department of Biological Sciences was received by
    Senate for information.
    40

    S.M. 04/02/91
    Page 8
    M-1 iUJT
    riii.1u :ririi
    Moved by R. Saunders, seconded by C. Jones
    "that Senate approve the admission of students from Fraser
    Valley, Douglas and Kwantlen Colleges who have completed the
    Associate in Science Diploma subject to the following minimum
    conditions:
    - 6 credits in mathematics (Calculus)
    - 6 credits in english
    - at least 6 further credits in a discipline other than biological
    sciences, chemistry, physics or mathematics
    - at least 36 further credits in biological sciences, chemistry,
    physics or mathematics, with at least 20 credits in one of these
    disciplines
    - at least 6 further credits in any discipline
    -. a minimum CGPA of 2.50
    All of the above courses and, all courses included in the CGPA
    must transfer to Simon Fraser University"
    In response to an inquiry as to why this was before Senate, J. Munro explained that it
    required Senate approval because it guarantees admission for students who have
    completed the Associate Program in Science with a transfer GPA of 2.5 no matter what
    the admission requirement for college transfer is set at. It was pointed out, however, that
    the question of the grade point average is open for discussion on a continuing basis. At
    the present time the college transfer admission GPA is 2.2 so the guarantee doesn't really
    mean anything but it would become crucial should the college transfer admission be
    raised above 2.5. It was also noted that Senate had already approved admission by
    Faculty and effective September 1992 the Faculty of Science will take advantage of this
    regulation; this proposal although not required for this change, complements it nicely.
    Concern was expressed about approving exceptions to rules, especially at this point
    when the exception is not really needed and the possibility in future of ending up with
    different exceptions to different rules in various faculties.
    In response to an inquiry with respect to potential conflicts between the motion and
    enrolment limitations, it was pointed out that if college transfer admission GPAs are set
    higher than the 2.5, any students admitted with the Associate credential at 2.5 would have
    to be taken into account in calculating the overall number of students admitted in the
    college transfer category. It was pointed out that students admitted with the Associate
    credential would be admitted to upper level Science courses which is an area where
    extra enrolment would not have severe effect on the rest of the university. The intent of
    the Associate Program was to encourage students in the college to focus their attention
    on the possibility of attending university and mapping out for them a cohesive program of
    courses that will allow them admission to the University to take a degree program in the
    Faculty of Science.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    B. Bedford requested his opposition be noted.

    S.M. 04/02/91
    Page 9
    6.
    Other Business
    There was no other business.
    7.
    Notices of Motion
    Paper S.91 -11 - Changes to the Rules of Senate. Sections V.A.6. V.A.7
    Senate received notice of motion for a proposal to change the Rules of Senate in order to
    allow the meeting time of Senate to be changed.
    The Chair indicated that a suggestion to consider this issue in the Closed Session of
    Senate will be reviewed by the Senate Committee on Agenda and Rules.
    8.
    Information
    The date of the next regularly scheduled meeting of Senate is Monday, March 4, 1991.
    Th Asèmb' moved dfrecfly uito Closed Session at 8:05 p.m.
    H. Nagel
    Acting Secretary of Senate
    U
    0

    Back to top