. DRAFT UNTIL APPROVED BY SENATE
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE SENATE OF SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY HELD
?
ON MONDAY, MAY
15,
1989 KLAUS RIECKHOFF HALL, 4:00 P.M.
?
OPEN SESSION
S
Present: ?
Saywell, W.G., Chair
Alderson, E. (for R. Brown)
Barrow, R.
Bedford, B.
Berggren, J.L.
Calvert, T.
Carlson, R.
Clayman, B.
Covell, M.
D'Auria, J.
DiFonzo, R.
Freedman, A.
Giffen, K.
Gill, P.
Hoechsmann, M.
Hobson, R. (for .D. George)
Hoegg, J.L.
JOnes, C.
Khosla, S.
Mauser, G.
Mathewes, R.
McGivern, R.
Palmer, L.
Rae, B.
Reilly, N.
Rieckho!f, K.
Rudrum, A.
Saunders, R.
Shapiro, S.
Strate, G.
Swartz, N.
Tjosvold, D.
Tuinman, J.
Verdun-Jones, S.
Winne, P.
Wotherspoon, A.
W.R. Heath, Secretary
Grant, B., Recording Secretary
Absent: ?
Beedic, R.
Blaney, J.
Cerconc, N.
Cleveland, W.
Dickinson, J.
Djwa, S.
Dobb, T.
Fitzsimmons, C.
Goodman, D.
Ivany, G.
Kazepides, A.C.
Kennedy, P.
Maaske, R.
Nicol, I.
Nielsen, V.
Nyvik, S.
Pinfield, L.
Rashed, S.
Salter, L.
Shannon, D.
Shickele, J.
Warsh, M.
Weinberg, H.
Weldon, L.
S.M. 15/05/89
Page 2
1.
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
In response to his request that the 1974 external review of the Department of
English be added to the Agenda, B. Bedford was advised to raise this motion
under "Notices of Motion". The agenda was approved.
2.
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE OPEN SESSION OF APRIL 3. 1989
Objection was raised to the use of 'collaborately on Page 3, Line 6 and request
made for amendment to 'in collaboration with', following which the Minutes
were approved.
3.
BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES
Reference was made to the External Review Report of the English Department,
and opinion was expressed that some of the remarks pertaining to the
expected performance of faculty members might appropriately be considered
by the University Tenure Committee. Inquiry was made as to whether the
report could be forwarded to the UTC for general consideration of these
comments. The Chair indicated that he would take under advisement the
more general question of whether or not reports of this nature, if deemed
relevant by the Academic Vice-President, should be forwarded to the UTC.
4.
REPORT OF THE CHAIR
There was no report from the Chair.
5.
REPORTS OF COMMITTEES
a) SENATE COMMITTEE ON ACADEMIC PLANNING
i)
Paper S.89-21 - Annual Report
The Annual Report of the Senate Committee on Academic Planning was
received by Senate for information.
ii)
Paper S.89-22 - Undergraduate Admission Targets 1989-3
Moved by R. Saunders, seconded by A. Wotherspoon
"that Senate approve and recommend approval to the
Board of Governors, as set out in S.89-22, that a target of
3,400 new undergraduate admissions be established for
the Fall Semester 1989-3"
S
R. Saunders introduced the paper by explaining that subsequent to Senate
passing legislation to reduce admissions in the Fall Semester 1989-3 because
of lack of resources, the University had received increased funding allowing
the target figure to be changed. He advised Senate that the increased funding
was directly tied to the Provincial Government's policy on access and that in
S.M. 15/05/89
Page
. ?
order for the University to acquire this additional funding, the University had
to commit itself to an additional enrolment of 600 FTEs per year for the next
six years. In return, full funding of $6,500 per student would be made
available to the University. The proposed figure of 3,400 would meet the FTE
target of 600 for the coming academic year.
Discussion turned to the definition of FTE as it pertained to Simon Fraser
University. R. Saunders indicated that Simon Fraser University considers an
FTE as a full time student registered over two semesters and indicated an
approximate ratio of two to one for campus registrations and four to one for
Harbour Centre.
Concerns were expressed about the rapidity with which plans for expansion
were proceeding and how increased numbers of students could be
accommodated in view of the current resource and space limitations. Opinion
was expressed that it would be more feasible to improve facilities and
increase staff before such expansion took place. R. Saunders responded that
investigation is underway with regard to the offering of third and fourth year
courses, on stipend, in Fall 1989-3 in existing institutions such as Fraser
Valley College and Kwantlen College. This would account for approximately
• 100 FTEs; Harbour Centre would account for about 100 FTEs, DISC
approximately 50 FTEs; and together with the fifteen percent increase in
Summer registrations, this would bring the total very close to the target
figure.
Inquiry was made as to the planning and decision-making process involved in
the offering of courses at other sites this Fall. Senate was informed that this
was a temporary measure and that details had not yet been worked out but
policy decisions would follow the normal process.
The Chair advised Senate that a more permanent presence was envisioned in
the long term for the Fraser Valley area which would hopefully accommodate
about 2,500 FTEs, leaving approximately 1200 FTEs for campus growth over
the next six years. However, it was noted that the possibility of a Simon
Fraser campus in the Fraser Valley area was currently under investigation.
Referring to the concerns expressed about the shortage of space in relation to
increased enrolments, R. Saunders advised that the nine new classrooms
available this fall will allOw accommodation of the expected increase of 200-
300 FTEs and that the construction of the IMMB building in approximately
two years will add additional classroom space sufficient to accommodate
approximately 750 new FTEs.
• The Chair felt there were several advantages to growing at the level and
speed resulting from the access funding.
?
Government has fast-tracked
S.M. ?
15/05/89
Page 4
approval
of ?
capital ?
funding
allowing
?
the
University ?
to ?
proceed ?
with ?
major
building
and ?
renovation ?
projects, ?
and ?
the
alleviation ?
of ?
structural ?
physical
deficiencies at a much more
rapid pace.
?
The acquisition of additional access
funding
has also enabled the
University to
initiate the hiring process for new
teaching
appointments.
Senate was reminded that Simon Fraser University had admitted as many
students as it could over past years in the belief that it would eventually
benefit under the old formula funding, but past data indicates funding per
student has in fact decreased over that period. Once again Simon Fraser
University is being asked to increase its student numbers without any
recognition from Government for its past efforts in this regard. The Chair
informed Senate the Government had indeed recognized that Simon Fraser
University had taken in more growth over the past years by increasing the
amount of funding per FTE student from a lesser amount originally proposed.
Question was called, and a vote taken.
?
MOTION CARRIED
6.
OTHER BUSINESS
There was no other business.
7.
NOTICES OF MOTION
A request by B. Bedford for copies of the 1974 external review report of the
English Department was ruled to be a request for information rather than a
notice of motion. Since earlier review reports were not automatically
forwarded to Senate, the Chair indicated that he would determine the status
of the report and would report back to Senate. It was suggested that copies
of past review reports could probably be found in the University Archives.
8.
INFORMATION
The date of next regularly scheduled meeting of Senate is Monday, June 5,
1989.
The Assembly moved directly into Closed Session at 5:00 p.m.
W.R. Heath
Registrar and Secretary of Senate
.