-2-
    ?
    S.M. 5/3/84
    Following are the results of recent student elections to Senate and to the
    Board of Governors:
    SENATE
    By-election of four students (one of whom must be from the Faculty of
    Engineering Science): to fill existing vacancies for terms of office from date
    of election to May 31, 1984:
    Elected by acclamation:
    ?
    R. BRUSKIEW.ICH.
    R. GAWLICK
    N. GRANT
    C. PAGE
    The above-named newly elected Senators were welcomed to Senate by the
    Chairman.
    Regular election of twelve students, with at least one representative of
    each Faculty, for terms of office from June 1, 1984 to May 31, 1985.
    Ballots Cast ?
    870
    Ballots Spoiled 18
    S
    Individual totals:
    Camp
    382
    Chin
    320
    Dalby
    358
    Dixon-Warren
    255
    Flynn
    355
    Gawlick
    203
    Grant
    255
    Julian
    315
    Noonan
    335
    Page
    349
    Sommers
    313
    Stewart
    278
    Tay
    260
    Tham
    284
    Zeller
    407
    The following were elected (in numerical ranking within Faculty) for terms
    of office from June 1, 1984 to May 31, 1985:
    Arts: ?
    C. CAMP
    S. DALBY
    G. M. FLYNN
    C. PAGE
    P. JULIAN
    Business
    AdxñIñi'stration: P. ZELLER
    M. NOONAN
    .
    ?
    K.C. CHIN
    Education ?
    H. McALLISTER (Acclamation)
    Engineering
    Science: ?
    R. BRUSKIEWICH (Acclamation)

    Interdisciplinary
    Studies:
    B. P. ARCHER
    (Acclamation)
    .
    -3-
    ?
    S.N. 5/3/84
    Science:
    ?
    R. STEWART
    BOARD OF GOVERNORS
    Election of two full-time students to the Board of Governors for terms of
    office from June 1, 1984 to May 31, 1985:
    Ballots Cast ?
    849
    Ballots Spoiled 13
    Individual totals:
    ?
    Dowd
    332
    -
    ?
    Grant
    119
    Isobe
    191
    Sommers
    237
    Stewart.
    411
    Williams
    286
    Two individuals receiving the highest numbers
    of votes and declared elected:
    ?
    P. G. STEWART
    S. M. DOWD
    .1
    1.
    APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
    The Agenda was approved as distributed.
    2.
    APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
    The Minutes of the Open Session of February 6, 1984 were approved as
    distributed.
    3. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES
    In response to the request for documentation on visa students and
    related SCAP papers, the Chairman indicated that this material will be
    provided when the proposal on program level quotas is presented to Senate
    for consideration.
    4. REPORT OF THE CHAIRMAN
    a) ?
    Senate was informed that the President was absent due to his attendance
    at meetings of the Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada
    in Montreal.
    W
    The Chairman reported that although the budget is now known, final confirma-
    tion of the exact grant reduction has not yet been received although it is
    expected it will be In the area of five percent and reference was made to
    .
    ?
    the recent letter from the President to the university community outlining
    Simon Fraser's planned response to that reduction.
    c)
    ?
    ?
    Senate was informed that William M. Hamilton had been elected by acclamation
    as Chancellor of Simon Fraser University for a
    .
    -three-year term of office
    commencing June 15, 1984. W. Hamilton holds an honorary degree from SFU
    and, for many years, had been a member of the Board of Governors as well as
    a previous member of Senate.

    -4-
    ?
    S.M. 5/3/84
    5. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES
    .
    ?
    i) SENATE NOMINATING COMMITTEE
    a) Paper
    S.84-17 -
    Elections
    Elections to fill vacancies on a number of Senate Committees were
    conducted, the results of which follow.
    Senate Committee on Academic Planning (SCAP)/Senate Committee on University
    Budget (SCUB)
    One Student Senator to replace R.N.D. Bennett for balance term of office,
    from date of election to September 30, 1985.
    Ballots Cast:
    ?
    36
    Ballots Spoiled: -
    Individual totals: ?
    Noonan ?
    28 ?
    - -
    Tham
    ?
    8
    Individual receiving the higher number of
    votes and declared elected:
    ?
    M. NOONAN
    Senate Committee on Agenda and Rules (SCAR).
    One Senator at large to replace C. OtFallon for balance term of office,
    from date of election to September 30, 1985.
    Elected by acclamation:
    ?
    M.D. HARRIS
    Senate Committee on Continuing Studies (SCCS)
    One Student Senator to replace C. O'Fallon for balance term of office,
    from date of election to September 30, 1984.
    No Nominations Received
    Senate Committee on Honorary Degrees (.SCHD)
    One Student Senator to replace S. Kristen for no specified term of office.
    No Nominations Received
    Senate Library Committee (SLC)/Library Penalties Appeal Committee (LPAC)
    One Student Senator to replace R.N.D. Bennett for balance term of office,
    from date of election to September 30, 1984.
    Elected by acclamation:
    ?
    H. A. THAN
    Senate Nominating Committee (SNC)
    One Student Senator to replace R.N.D. Bennett for balance term of office,
    from date of election to September 30, 1984.
    0
    ?
    No Nominations Received

    S.M. 5/3/84
    Senate Undergraduate Admissions Board (SUAB)
    . ?
    Two Student Senators to replace R.N.D. Bennett and K. Clark for balance
    ?
    terms of office, from date of election to September 30, 1984.
    Ballots Cast:
    ?
    35
    Ballots Spoiled:
    ?
    3
    Individual totals:
    ?
    Noonan ?
    24
    Page ?
    28
    Tham
    ?
    12
    Two individuals receiving the highest
    numbers of votes and declared elected:
    ?
    C. PAGE
    M.
    NOONAN
    Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies (SCUS)
    Three Student Senator Alternates to replace K. Clark, C. O'Fallon and
    S. Kristen for no specified term of office.
    Elected by acclamation:
    ?
    N. FINBERG
    N.
    GRANT
    Since only two nominations were received, one position remains vacant.
    0
    ?
    ii).
    SENATE COMMITTEE ON UNDERGRADUATE STUDIES
    a) Paper S.84-18 - History
    Moved by R. Brown, seconded by A. Wotherspoon,
    "That Senate approve and recommend approval to
    the Board of Governors, as set forth in S.84-18,
    the proposed
    New course - HIST 402-3 -. Progress and Decline:
    ?
    Ideas and Realities"
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED.
    bi. Paper S.84-19 - Humanities
    Moved by R. Brown, seconded by A. Wotherspoon,
    "That Senate approve and recommend approval to
    the Board of Governors, as set forth in S.84-19,
    the proposed
    New course - HUM. 303-3 - The Latin Humanist
    Tradition"
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED.
    Subject to approval of the course by Senate and the Board of
    Governors the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies approved
    waiver of the normal two-semester time lag requirement to permit
    first offering in Fall 84-3.

    - 6 -
    ?
    S.N. 5/3/84
    c)
    Paper 5.84-20 - Faculty of Education
    SMoved by J.W.G. Ivany, seconded by A.C. Kazepides,
    "That Senate approve and recommend approval to the
    Board of Governors, as set forth in S.84-20, the
    proposed
    Changes to the Minor in Learning Disabilities"
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED.
    d)
    Paper S.84-21 - Final Exam Scheduling
    Moved by T. Calvert, seconded by A. Wotherspoon,
    "That Senate approve, as set forth in S.84-21, the
    proposals
    i). To provide for a two-day break (Saturday, Sunday)
    between end of classes and the beginning of the exam
    period by shortening the exam period to twelve days.
    [This will eliminate the first day (usually Saturday)
    from the exam period. Normally exams will end on Friday
    (day eleven of the exam period two weeks after the end of
    classes)]
    ii)
    To increase the number of time slots per day for exams
    from three to four.
    ?
    [This is required to produce a generally conflict free
    exam schedule. The proposed start time for exams are
    0830
    1
    1200, 1530, 1900]
    /
    ?
    Exams will be scheduled on Friday and Saturday evenings,
    if required.
    [These items will provide 33 time slots for day exams (11 x 3)
    and 11 time slots for evening exams. This number of slots is
    required to minimize timetable conflict problems].
    iii)
    That in-class final exams are not to be held before the
    beginning of the examination period.
    iv)
    That take-home final examinations may be assigned before
    the start of the examination period, at as early as is reason-
    able, but their return cannot be required until the commence-
    ment of the examination period."
    Attention was drawn to the general background information and intent set
    forth in the transmittal memorandum. (Aspects of basic class scheduling are
    going forward from SCUS as a separate issue to Faculties for comments).
    It was made clear the Student Society supports the proposals. Clarifica-
    tion was requested as to what classified a "final" examination and the Secretary
    provided brief background information and definition.
    . ?
    Speaking in favour of the motion, K. Rieckhoff expressed belief that the
    proposal was long overdue and went a long way in helping to ensure that
    instruction time will be used for instruction, exams will be held during the
    formal exam period and that there will be a reasonable break between the end of
    teaching and the beginning of exams.

    -7-
    ?
    S.M. 5/3/84
    In reply to concerns with regard to students writing three or four exams
    in one day and whether or not there was any formal course of appeal in such
    situatIons, Senate was assured that the administration would undertake all
    efforts to ensure that no student would be required to write four exams in one
    day and that the Registrar's Office will undertake to keep at a minimum the
    number of cases requiring three examinations on one day.
    D. McDonald referred to the possibility of scheduling some evening exams
    on Saturday and of joint examinations in some cases for day and evening groups.
    K. Rieckhoff observed that there was no assurance that an evening student
    necessarily could be available during the day on Saturday and the Chairman noted
    the new provisions for examinations on Friday and Saturday evenings if needed.
    The Secretary indicated that there had been discussion at SCUS and that on this
    topic his. office would be talking further, particularly with the Faculty of
    Business Administration and the Faculty of Education relative to some of these
    proposals.
    T. Calvert indicated support for the proposal as a reasonable compromise,
    that it should be tried and if adjustments are required they should be based on
    experience. He intends to look in his Faculty at basic clash scheduling items.
    R. Brüskiewich suggested that there be inclusion of a statement in the
    Calendar relative to examination conflicts and the requirement of no more than
    three exams in a day. A statement may also be placed on the exam timetable.
    R. Brown expressed concern that the working of Item iii appeared to weaken
    • ?
    some present regulations, was open to a variety of interpretations and requested
    clarification as to the intent. J. Munro indicated that it was not intended to
    change or weaken present policy but rather to give more direct emphasis and
    visibility to the items involved. Dropping of the phrase "in-class" in Item iii
    might render that item clearer.
    Discussion ensued with a variety of opinions and suggestions being expressed
    as to possible alternatives. A. Wotherspoon moved that the proposal be referred
    back. to SCUS for further consideration; there was no seconder.
    Question was called on the main motion,
    and a vote was taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED.
    iii) SENATE COMMITTEE ON ACADEMIC PLANNING/SENATE COMMITTEE ON UNDERGRADUATE
    STUDIES
    a) Paper S.84-22 - Extended Studies Diploma - Ethnic Relations
    Moved by R. Brown, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,
    "That Senate approve and recommend approval to the
    Board of Governors, as set forth in S.84-22, the
    proposed program Extended Studies Diploma - Ethnic
    Relations"
    .
    ?
    ?
    Given current financial restraints and the fact that PACUP was in the
    process of developing a statement on mission and academic planning priorities,
    R. Stewart opposed the motion on the grounds that consideration of new programs
    should be postponed until such time as PACUP comes forward with a proposal
    for the long-term planning and development of the university. Senate could
    then evaluate more clearly whether or not proposed programs are needed and
    in the best interest of the University.

    - 8 -
    ? S.M. 5/3/84
    K. Rieckhoff stressed the fact that this proposal would not cost the ?
    University any additional money or resources since it was entirely consistent
    S
    on regularly offered existing courses and that it simply identified a coherent
    academic area which could be offered as 'a package to interested students.
    R. Brown expressed belief that this kind of creative use of
    existing curriculum should be
    ,
    encouraged in times like this and indicated
    full support for the motion.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED.
    iv) EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE SENATE GRADUATE STUDIES COMMITTEE
    a)
    Paper S.84-23 - Mathematics
    Moved by J. Webster, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,
    "That Senate approve and recommend approval to
    the Board of Governors, as set forth in S.84-23,
    the proposed new graduate courses:
    MATH 850-4 Numerical Linear Algebra
    MATH 851-4 Numerical Solution of Ordinary
    Differential Equations
    MATH 852-4 Selected Topics in Numerical Analysis"
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED.
    b)
    Paper S.84-24 - Approval of Credit For Short Courses sponsored
    by the Western Canadian Deans of Graduate Studies
    Moved by J. Webster, seconded by N. Grant,
    "That Senate approve and recommend approval to
    the Board of Governors, as set forth in S.84-24,
    the following motion:
    'That the specialist Short Courses
    sponsored by the Western Canadian Deans
    of Graduate Studies carry one semester
    hour of credit' "
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED.
    6.
    REPORTS OF FACULTIES
    There were no reports from Faculties.
    7.
    OTHER BUSINESS
    There was no other business.
    8. NOTICES OF MOTION
    There were no notices of motion.
    /
    9. ?
    INFORMATION
    The next regular meeting of Senate is scheduled for Monday,
    April 2, 1984.
    At 8:00 p.m. the assembly took a brief recess prior to moving into Closed Session.
    H. M. Evans,

    Back to top