0 ?
    DRAFT UNTIL APPROVED BY SENATE
    MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE SENATE OF SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY HELD
    MONDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 1981, 3172 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 7:00 P.M.
    OPEN SESSION
    Present: Pedersen, K. G., Chairman
    Anderson, S. K.
    Absent:
    ?
    Arrott, A. S.
    Beirne, B. P.
    Cote, P. T.
    Bhakthan, N.M.G.
    Dobb, T. C.
    Blaney, J. P.
    Doherty, P. M.
    Bowman, M. L.
    Ivany, J.W.G.
    Brown, R. C.
    McKeown, B. A.
    Calvert, T. W.
    Moffatt, D. C.
    Cochran, J. F.
    Toor, J. B.
    Crawley, J. N.
    Webster, J. M.
    Einstein, F.
    Weinberg, H.
    Evenden, L. J.
    Wideen, N. F.
    Geen, G. H.
    Gehibach, R. D.
    In attendance:
    ?
    Brantingham, P. J.
    Hale, L. R.
    Powell, R.
    . ? Hanson, J. A.
    Hinchcliffe, S.
    Holmes, R. A.
    Irwin, J. C.
    Johnston, H.J.M.
    Jones, C.H.W.
    Litwin, W. G.
    Luetzen, S.
    Mackauer, J.P.M.
    McNabb, C. T.
    Munro, J. M.
    Okuda, K.
    Overholt, M. J.
    Palmer, L. H.
    Rieckhoff, K. E.
    Starcevich, R.D.I.
    Trainer, N. D.
    Tuinman, J. J.
    Vérdun-Jones, S. N.
    Wagner,?. L.
    Weinkam, J. J.
    Wotherspoon, A. J.
    Evans, H. M., Secretary
    Heath, N.
    0 ?
    . _
    Norsworthy, R., Recording Secretary

    In the recent elections of students to the Board of Governors and
    to Senate, the following were elected by acclamation:
    Board, of Governors
    Two students to be elected for terms of office from June 1, 1981 to
    May 31, 1982.
    Elected by acclamation: ?
    I. J. McASKILL
    G. T. McNABB
    Senate
    By-election: Two students to be elected (one from the Faculty of
    Education, and one from the Faculty of Interdisciplinary Studies) for
    terms of office from date of election to May 31, 1981.
    Elected by acclamation:
    ?
    A. J. WOTHERSPOON (Faculty of
    Interdisciplinary Studies)
    There were no nominations of students from the Faculty of Education.
    Regular election: Eleven students, with at least one from each Faculty
    for terms of office from June 1, 1981 to May 31, 1982.
    Elected by acclamation:
    ?
    re-elected
    J. M.
    CRAWLEY (Arts)
    re-elected
    L. R.
    HALE (Science)
    re-elected
    '
    ?
    J. A.
    HANSON (Arts)
    re-elected
    S. HINCHCLIFFE (Arts)
    re-elected
    G.
    T.
    McNABB (Arts)
    W. G. SHOWLER (Arts)
    R. J.
    SMITH (Arts)
    re-elected
    R.D.I.
    STARCEVICH (Science)
    A. J. WOTHERSPOON (IDS)
    A second call for nominations and election of two students to fill the
    remaining vacancies is currently in flow.
    1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
    The Chairman advised that an additional item of business had been
    received concerning an appeal to Senate relating to election procedures,
    and T. McNabb requested that a submission by the student caucus be included
    on the agenda in conjunction with Paper S.81-34 - Report, Senate Committee
    to Consider Student Academic Discipline and Conduct.
    Moved by K. Rieckhoff, seconded by M. Trainer,
    "That the agenda be approved with the two additional
    items noted."
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED

    -3-
    ?
    S.M. 9/2/81
    2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
    K. Rieckhoff contested a statement on page 12 of the previous
    minutes and it was agreed that paragraph 4 would be altered to read,
    "K. Rieckhoff and T. Arrott spoke in opposition to the motion."
    Question was called on a motion to approve the minutes as amended
    of the Open Session of January 12, 1981, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    3. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES
    There was no business arising from the minutes.
    4. REPORT OF CHAIRMAN
    i)
    The Chairman informed Senate that the Discovery Park lease is now
    finalized and that the first tenants have commenced construction. Two
    additional leases relating to the B. C. Television tower and use of
    University land for a gun club have been approved by the Board of Governors.
    ii)
    The Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada has made strong
    representations to the federal government with regard to inter-governmental.
    transfers of funding to support post-secondary education, and the Canadian
    Association of University Teachers has taken a similar position. The three
    . ?
    provincial university Presidents have recently met with Senator Ray Perrault
    to indicate major concerns regarding possibility of reduced federal support
    for higher education.
    iii)
    Terms of reference are currently being developed for a committee to
    be charged with consideration and resolution of SFU's enrolment problem and
    the
    effects
    of both the capital and operating budgets.
    iv)
    Universities Council of B.C. has recently requested the University's
    reaction regarding the financing formula
    for the province's three universities.
    V
    )
    A call for nominations and election of Chancellor and four Convocation
    Senators has been issued, and the deadline for receipt of nominations Is
    Thursday, February 12, 1981, with the successful candidates to take office
    for three year terms commencing June1981.
    5. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES
    i) Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies
    a) Paper S.81-31 - Changes - Humanities
    Moved by R. Brown, seconded by W. Litwin,
    "That Senate approve, and recommend approval to the
    • ?
    Board of Governors, as set forth In S.81-31, the
    addition of LATN 101 and FPA. 116 to courses appro-
    priate for the Humanities Minor Program.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    .

    - ?
    /h/Oj.
    ?
    *
    b) Paper S.81-32 - Proposed Changes in Regulations - PDP -
    Faculty of Education
    Moved by L. Hale, seconded by W. Litwin,
    "That Senate approve, and recoimnend approval to the
    Board of Governors, as set forth in S.81-32, the
    proposed changes in general regulations related to
    the PDP: Items (2) (a) (1); (2) (d); (4) (b); (5)."
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    ii)
    Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies/Senate Committee on
    Academic Planning
    Moved by R. Brown, seconded by W. Litwin,
    "That Senate approve and recommend approval to the
    Board of Governors, as set forth in S.81-33, .the
    proposed Joint Major Program in French, History and
    Politics."
    Question was called, and a Vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    iii)
    Senate Committee to Consider Student Academic Discipline and Conduct
    a) Paper S.81-34 - Report
    ?
    is
    P. Brantinghatn was in attendance and was invited to join the
    assembly to contribute to the discussion of the Report of the Senate
    Committee to Consider Student Academic Discipline and Conduct.
    The Chairman instructed that the intention of the Senate Committee
    on Agenda and Rules is that the SADC papers attached to S.81-34 be dealt
    with in the following manner:
    SADC 85 - to be considered in total
    SADC 87 - to be considered seriatim
    SADC 89 - to be considered seriatim
    It is the intention, also, to consider the amendments proposed by the student
    caucus as defined in Paper S.81-34 D, E. and F.
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,
    "That Senate approve the proposed Statement on
    Intellectual Honesty, as set forth in SADC 85."
    J. Munro stated that the proposal would introduce and make public the
    University's concerns for the highest standards of intellectual honesty in the
    conduct of its affairs and to put by way of warning penalties that can be

    5 -
    ?
    S.M. 9/2/81
    applied for violations of standards of intellectual honesty.
    Discussion centred on the definition of "aiding and abetting" in
    connection with cheating.
    An amendment was moved by T. McNabb, seconded by L. Hale,
    "That the word 'kowirigly' be inserted prior to
    'aiding and abetting."
    Question was called on the amendment, and a vote taken.
    AMENDMENT FAILED
    Question was called on the main motion on SADC 85, and a vote taken.
    MOTION ON SADC 85 CARRIED
    Senate then turned attention to SADC 87, with intent for main
    motion followed by discussion and action seriatim.
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,
    "That Senate approve the Procedures for Dealing with
    S ?
    Incidents of Intellectual Dishonesty, as set forth
    ?
    in S.81-34B (SADC 87) ."
    Moved by T. McNabb, seconded by J. Crawley,
    "That S.81-34B be referred back to the Committee,
    together with S.81-34E, for redrafting."
    L. Hale suggested that it would be more expedient than engaging in
    lengthy debate to refer the matter back to the Committee for its recon-
    sideration in the light of the proposals for amendment prepared by the
    student caucus. W. Litwin felt that recent revisions to the proposal,
    following the January open forum, had not been circulated in sufficient
    time for members to be prepared to consider the report formally. K.
    Rieckhoff and J. Munro urged that the matter be dealt with at the current
    meeting, as the essential thread of most of the caucus amendments had
    been considered previously at great length, with legal advice, by the
    Committee in the course of its deliberations. There is need to obtain
    some sense of feel of what Senate desires. J. Crawley felt referral
    would satisfy most of the questions students are concerned about.
    Question was called on the motion to refer, and a vote taken.
    MOTION TO REFER FAILED
    .
    ?
    ?
    Discussion resumed on the main motion, and T. McNabb stated that
    the proposed amendments were designed to increase students' access to
    appeal procedures. P. Brantingham provided information relating to
    judicial procedures. Lengthy discussion followed.
    Motion was moved by J. Munro, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,

    - 0 ?
    b.L1. ,/L/öj.
    "That Paragraph A.l '..of SADC 87 be approved."
    An amendment was moved by T. McNabb, seconded by J. Crawley,
    "That Paragraph A.l of SADC 87 be amended by
    substituting for the words 'does not in any way'
    the word 'may,' in the last sentence; and substi-
    tuting for the word 'expected' the word 'required'
    in the first sentence."
    Question was called on the amendment, and a vote taken.
    AMENDMENT FAILED
    Question was called on the main motion on Paragraph A.l, and a vote
    taken.
    PARAGRAPH A. 1 CARRIED
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,
    "That Paragraph A.2 of SADC 87 be approved."
    Amendment was moved by T. McNabb, seconded by J.. Crawley,
    "That a new paragraph be added before the existing
    Paragraph A.2, to read as follows:
    'When a course instructor suspects that a student is,
    or has been, involved in academic misconduct, the
    course instructor shall inform the student of that
    suspicion, and allow the student to present his/her
    defense in such a manner, and with such assistance as
    the student sees fit. This shall occur before either
    the imposition of a penalty (under Section A.2(a)) or
    referral to the Department Chair (under A.2(b)), or to
    the President (under A.2(c))."
    An amendment to the amendment, proposed by F. Einstein, seconded
    by W. Litwin, "That the words 'in such a manner, and with such assist-
    ance as the student sees fit' be deleted' was accepted by the mover as
    a friendly amendment.
    Question was called on the amendment, and a vote taken.
    AMENDMENT CARRIED
    Question was called on the motion as amended on Paragraph A.2 of
    SADC 87, and a vote taken.
    PARAGRAPH A. 2 AS AMENDED
    CARRIED
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,?
    "That Paragraph A. 3 be approved."

    - 7 -
    ?
    S.M. 9/2/81
    Amendment was moved by T. McNabb, seconded by A. Wotherspoon,
    "That the paragraph be amended to read, 'The
    Department Chair shall investigate the facts, with
    the affected student and his/her representative
    present, relating to the incident of alleged
    intellectual dishonesty, before approving a penalty
    under Paragraph A. 2(c)."
    Question was called on the amendment, and a vote taken.
    AMENDMENT FAILED
    Question was call on the main motion on Paragraph A.3, and a vote taken.
    PARAGRAPH A. 3 CARRIED
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,
    "That Paragraph A. 4 be approved."
    Amendment was moved by T. McNabb, seconded by J. Crawley,
    "That Paragraph A. 4 be amended by the addition of
    . ?
    the words 'subject to approval by Senate' at the end
    of the last sentence of the paragraph."
    Question was called on the amendment, and a vote taken.
    AMENDMENT FAILED
    Question was called on the main motion on Paragraph A. 4, and a vote taken.
    PARAGRAPH A. 4 CARRIED
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,
    "That Paragraph A. 5
    be approved."
    Amendment was moved by T. McNabb, seconded by J. Crawley,
    "That Paragraph A. S be amended by adding, after
    the word 'appeal' in the second sentence, the
    words 'the allegation of guilt and/or."
    Through friendly amendment "allegation" was replaced by "judgment."
    Question was called on the amendment, and a vote taken.
    S. ?
    AMENDMENT CARRIED
    Question was called on the main motion on Paragraph A. 5, and a vote
    taken.
    PARAGRAPH A. 5 AS AMENDED
    CARRIED

    --
    ?
    - ?
    .,.J&. ?
    ij L/ (_L1_
    Moved by J. Munro, secondedby K. Rieckhoff,
    "That Paragraph A. 6 be approved."
    Amendment was moved by T. McNabb, seconded by J. Crawley, ?
    S
    "That Paragraph A. 6 be amended by the addition at
    the end of the sentence, 'A departmental committee
    shall have the power to relieve against a failure to
    meet such time limit, by a vote of 3/4ths (or more)
    of the committee."
    Question was called on the amendment, and a vote taken.
    AMENDMENT CARRIED
    Question was called on the main motion on Paragraph A. 6, and a vote
    taken.
    PARAGRAPH A. 6 AS AMENDED
    CARRIED
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,
    "That Paragraph A. 7 be approved."
    Amendment was moved by T. McNabb, seconded by J. Crawley,
    "That Paragraph A. 7 be changed to read: 'If the
    course instructor and the departmental chairman,
    after thorough investigation, believe that the
    seriousness of the alleged conduct warrants action
    under Paragra A. 2(c), they will forward the case
    to the President who shall, after full investigation
    and allowing the student involved to present such
    case in such manner as the student deems fit and
    having proper regard to the principles of natural
    justice, deal with the case at his/her discretion."
    Einstein and other
    "involved to present
    and having proper
    replace them with
    An amendment to the amendment proposed by F.
    changes were incorporated by the mover to delete
    such case in such manner as the student deems fit
    regard 'for the principles of natural justice" and
    "to present his/her defence."
    Question was called on the amendment, and a vote taken.
    AMENDMENT FAILED
    17 in favor
    18 opposed
    Question was called on the main motion on Paragraph A. 7, and a
    vote taken.
    PARAGRAPH A. 7 CARRIED
    ?
    0

    - 9 -
    ?
    S.M. 9/2/81
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,
    "That Paragraph A. 8 be approved."
    An amendment was moved by T. McNabb, seconded by J. Crawley, incor-
    porating some change in wording from recent discussion at Senate,
    "That Paragraph A. 8 be amended to read, 'When the
    Registrar believes that any document has been falsified
    or a misrepresentation has been made, that in any case
    may create an incorrect perception of a student's academic
    position or credentials, the Registrar may, after full
    investigation and allowing the student to present his/her
    defence, either issue a reprimand or recommend that the
    President review the case for a possible application of
    penalties involving the individual's status as a member
    of the university community."
    It was noted that the amendment is equivalent to the change in
    Paragraph A. 2.
    Question was called on the amendment, and a vote taken.
    .
    ?
    AMENDMENT CARRIED
    Question was call on the motion as amended on Paragraph A. 8, and a
    vote taken.
    PARAGRAPH A. 8 AS AMENDED
    CARRIED
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,
    ?
    "That Paragraph A. 9 be approved."
    T. McNabb announced that the amendment which had been proposed by
    the student caucus had been withdrawn.
    Question was called on the main motion on Paragraph A. 9, and a
    vote taken.
    PARAGRAPH A. 9 CARRIED
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,
    "That Paragraph A. 10 be approved."
    Question was called on the motion on Paragraph A. 10, and a vote taken.
    .
    ?
    PARAGRAPH A. 10 CARRIED
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,
    "That Paragraph B. 1 be approved."

    - 10 -
    ?
    S.M. 9/2/81
    Amendment was moved by T. McNabb, seconded by J. Crawley,
    "That the following be substituted for Paragraph
    B. 1: 'The rules and procedures governing the treat-
    ment of alleged incidents of misconduct shall conform,
    in all cases, to the requirements of natural justice.
    A person accused of an act of intellectual dishonesty
    shall enjoy the right to a speedy hearing by an impartial
    body; the right to be informed of the nature, cause, and
    originator of the accusation; the right to confront the
    witnesses against him/her self; the right to have the
    assistance of a representative of his/her choice in the
    presentation of her/his defense."
    An amendment to the amendment proposed by W. Litwin, seconded by
    L. Hale, "to insert following the word 'enjoy' the words 'but not be
    limited by," was accepted by the mover of the amendment.
    Question was called on the amendment, and a vote taken.
    AMENDMENT FAILED
    Question was called on the main motion on.Paragraph B. 1, and a vote
    taken.
    PARAGRAPH B. 1 CARRIED
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,
    "That Paragraph B. 2 be approved."
    Amendment was moved by T. McNabb, seconded by J. Crawley, with some
    change in wording from the written submission,
    "That Paragraph B. 2 be altered to read: 'A person, or
    a departmental committee making a recommendation or decision
    or imposing a penalty, shall adopt appropriate procedures and
    shall give the student every 'opportunity to present his/her
    defense. Such person, or committee, shall also hold all docu-.
    mentary evidence submitted to him/her/it, in connection with
    the matter under consideration, until all appeals under the
    procedures have been exhausted. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
    the minimum period for the retention of this evidence shall be
    one year. This material shall be forwarded to the Registrar,
    for safe keeping, at the termination of the appeal process."
    Question was called on the amendment, and a vote taken.
    AMENDMENT FAILED
    Question was called on the main motion on Paragraph B. 2, and a vote
    taken.
    PARAGRAPH B. 2 CARRIED

    'I
    S.M. 9/2/81
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,
    "That Paragraph B. 3 be approved."
    Amendment was moved by T. McNabb, seconded by J. Crawley,
    "That Paragraph B. 3 be amended by the addition of
    the following sentence to the end of the paragraph:
    'The possible grounds for appeal shall Include, but
    shall not be limited to, any or all of the following:
    (a) innocence; (b) violation of due process; (c)
    mitigating circumstances; (d) new evidence; (e) other
    reasons, as specified by the student."
    On discussion, the mover agreed to drop Clause (e).
    Question was called on the amendment, and a vote taken.
    AMENDMENT FAILED
    Question was called on the main motion on Pagaraph B. 3, and a vote
    taken.
    PARAGRAPH B. 3 CARRIED
    0 ?
    Moved.by J. Munro, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,
    "That Paragraph B. 4 be approved."
    Amendment was moved by T. McNabb, seconded by J. Crawley,
    "To substitute wording as follows: 'A student who
    appeals to the Senate Committee on Academic Discipline,
    pursuant to these procedures, shall be entitled to
    and shall be given a copy of the full record of the
    case under appeal. "Full record" of the case shall
    consist of all available documentary' evidence and oral
    presentations given, to the transcripts of the
    meetings of,and the decisions of each prior decision
    maker.
    The Chairman drew Senate's attention to the near expiration
    of the normal duration of Open Session deliberations.
    Moved by W. Litwin, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,
    That the Open Session of the meeting be extended
    by one hour."
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED TO
    EXTEND THE MEETING

    • T. McNabb noted that basically the final sentence of the original
    B. 4 would be deleted.
    Question was called on the amendment, and a vote taken.
    AMENDMENT FAILED
    Question was called on the main motion on Paragraph B. 4, and a
    vote taken.
    PARAGRAPH B. 4 CARRIED
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,
    "That Paragraph B. 5 be approved."
    Amendment was moved by T. McNabb, seconded by J. Crawley,
    "That Paragraph B. 5 be amended to read: 'The
    Senate Committee on Academic Discipline shall hold
    a hearing (or hearings) in respect of each appeal
    made to it, pursuant to these procedures, to hear
    such evidence and representation as the student wishes
    to present and to review the transcripts, records, and
    decisions from previous hearings, concerning each
    individual case. The student shall have the right and
    the opportunity to attend and to participate and to have
    a representative of his/her choice attend and participate
    in each hearing In respect of her/his appeal.
    The Chairperson of the Departmental Committee on Academic
    Discipline may be present and may be permitted to testify
    at any relevant hearing of the Senate Committee on
    Academic Discipline.
    The course instructor may be present and may be permitted
    to testify at any relevant hearing of the Senate Committee
    on Academic Discipline.
    Neither the appellant, nor his/her representative, nor the
    Chairperson of the Departmental Committee on Academic
    Discipline,-nor the course instructor, nor any other person
    having an Interest in the case (as determined by the Com-
    mittee) shall be present when the Senate Committee on
    Academic Discipline deliberates."'
    Question was called on the amendment, and a vote taken.
    AMENDMENT FAILED
    Amendment was moved by J. Munro, seconded by K. Rleckhoff,
    "That the following words be added to Paragraph B. 5,
    at the-end 6f-sentence 1 and at the end of ientence-2:
    'but may not be present during the Committee's deliberations."
    Question was called on the amendment, and a vote taken.
    AMENDMENT CARRIED
    .

    - 13- ?
    S.M. 9/2/81
    Question was called on the motion on Paragraph B. 5 as amended, and
    a vote taken.
    PARAGRAPH B. 5 CARRIED
    Moved by.J. •Munro, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,
    "That Paragraph B. 6 be approved."
    An amendment moved by T. McNabb, seconded by J. Crawley, to insert
    the word "every" prior to the word "reasonable" was accepted by the mover
    of the motion.
    Question was called on the motion as amended, and a vote taken.
    PARAGRAPH B. 6 AS AMENDED
    CARRIED
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,
    "That Paragraph B. 7 be approved."
    Amendment was moved by-T. McNabb, seconded by J. Crawley,
    "That the first sentence be changed to read:
    'Each finding of guilt and each decision to
    impose a penalty on a student and each decision
    on appeal therefrom shall be communicated, with
    the reasons for such finding or penalty, in
    writing to the student affected."
    Question was called on the amendment, and a vote taken.
    AMENDMENT FAILED
    Amendment was moved by J. Crawley, seconded by T. McNabb,
    "That the words 'and of the Student Society's
    legal services' be added to the second sentence
    of Paragraph B. 7."
    Question was called on the amendment, and a vote taken.
    AMENDMENT CARRIED
    Question was called on the motion as amended on Paragraph B. 7,
    and a vote taken.
    . ?
    PARAGRAPH B. 7 AS AMENDED
    CARRIED

    - 14 -
    ?
    S.M. 9/2/81
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,
    "That Paragraph B. 8 be approved."
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    PARAGRAPH B. 8 CARRIED
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,
    "That Paragraph B. 9 be approved."
    An amendment was moved by T. McNabb, seconded by J. Crawley,.
    "That Paragraph B. 9 be amended to read:
    'If an appeal is successful, every reasonable
    effort shall be made to return the student to
    the position he/she would have been in if the
    decision appealed from had not been made.
    More specifically, in the case of penalties
    imposed under Paragraphs A.,.3(a) or A. 3(b),
    the student shall be given the option of either
    completing the course (including objective grading
    of the work originally submitted) in which case
    the student shall be given an automatic thirty (30)
    day extension on the normal final date for the
    submission of work under special deferrals, or
    withdrawing from the course without academic or
    financial penalty.
    If on appeal all penalties are removed and course
    completion is not feasible within the automatic
    extension period, then
    a)
    the course tuition fees shall be repaid, and
    b)
    the costs of course materials and books shall
    be repaid, and
    c)
    a mark of
    AR
    shall be given for the course.
    The Senate Committee on Academic Discipline may
    recommend to the President that other additional
    forms of dispensation be granted, such additional
    dispensation shall not be unreasonably denied.
    If an appeal is successful, all reference to the
    alleged misconduct contained in the student's file
    shall be removed within ten (10) days of the appeal
    decision, and the Registrar shall confirm, in
    writing, to the student that this has been done..'."
    The mover and the seconder of the main motion agreed to incorporate
    the Aegrotat grading portion of the amendment into their motion.
    Question was called on the amendment, and a vote taken.
    AMENDMENT FAILED
    S
    S
    S

    .- 15 -
    ?
    S.M. 9/2/81
    Amendment was moved by J. Munro, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,
    "That the following words be added to the end of the
    second paragraph of Paragraph B. 9: 'and the student
    may 'receive a grade of AE for the course."
    It was pointed out that should the amendment be approved it would
    be necessary to revise the 'current definition of Aegrotat standing
    through the standard SCUS/Senate processes.
    Question was called on the amendment, and a vote taken.
    AMENDMENT CARRIED
    Question was called on the main motion as amended on Paragraph B. 9,
    and a vote taken.
    PARAGRAPH B. 9 AS AMENDED
    CARRIED
    Moved by J. Munro, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,
    "That Paragraph B. 10 be approved."
    Amendment was moved by T. McNabb, seconded by J. Crawley,
    "That the motion be amended by the addition of the
    following at the end of the paragraph: 'The student
    shall have the right of access to his/her permanent
    file and she/he shall be advised when any addition or
    deletion is made to his/her file."
    An amendment to the amendment proposed by W. Litwin to specify "copy
    of the student's file" was accepted by the mover of the amendment.
    ?
    ?
    The one hour extension of the meeting having elapsed, a motion
    was moved by A. Wotherspoon, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,
    "That the meeting be extended to 12 midnight."
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION FAILED
    Moved by W. Litwin, seconded by P. Wagner,
    S
    "That the balance of Paper S.81-34 be tabled."
    Question was called, a
    .
    nd"a vote taken.
    MOTION TO TABLE CARRIED

    - 16 -
    ?
    S.M. 9/2/81
    Further consideration of this item will ensue with the motion and
    the amendment on the floor in connection with Paragraph B. 10.
    Moved
    by J. Crawley, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,
    "That the meeting be extended to consider an
    item under Other Business."
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    6.
    REPORT OF FACULTIES
    There were no reports from faculties.
    7.
    OTHER BUSINESS
    A paper entitled "Annual Election, Two Students to the Board of
    Governors, 1981-82, Results - Challenge," and a paper from the complainant,
    R. Powell, were distributed (since numbered S.81-45) which outlined the
    general background under which the Secretary of Senate is responsible for
    the overall procedures in connection with elections. The Chairman informed
    Senate that it had the option of approving the procedures and accepting the
    results or to direct the Secretary to hold a further election. The Secre-
    tary provided information with respect to previous elections and the basis
    of the decision to combine by-election and regular election calls for
    effectiveness in meeting time and cost constraints.
    Moved by N. Nackauer,. seconded by W. Litwin,
    "That the appeal of R. Powell be rejected."
    Discussion followed on the adequacy of the current procedures for
    announcing elections to ensure that the information is made available to
    all interested members of the community.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    T. McNabb asked that his abstention be recorded.
    R. Powell stated that the purpose of his challenge was to ensure that
    students will receive proper notice of calls for nominations and elections.
    8.
    NOTICES OF MOTION
    There were no notices of motion.
    9. INFORMATION
    The next regular meeting of Senate is scheduled for Monday, March 2,
    1981.
    The meeting was recessed at 11:35 p.m., prior to moving into Closed
    Session.
    H. N. Evans
    Secretary

    Back to top