DRAFT UNTIL APPROVED BY SENATE
    MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE SENATE OF SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY HELD
    ?
    MONDAY, OCTOBER 4, 1976, 3172 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 7:00 P.M.
    .
    ??
    OPEN SESSION
    Present:- Jewett, P., Chairman
    .
    Arrott, A. S.
    Birch, D. R.
    Bitle, D.
    Blaney, J. P.
    Brown, R. C.
    Buitenhuis, P.
    Calvert, T. W.
    Carlson, R. L.
    Catalano, J. A.
    Cunningham, F.
    Curzon, A. E.
    Davison, A. J.
    Dawson, A. J.
    Debo, R. K.
    Dobb, T. C.
    ?
    representing D. Baird
    Ellis, J. F.
    Emery, B. E.
    Erickson, D. A.
    Fattah, E. A.
    Finlayson, T.
    Hindley, M. P.
    Hutchinson, J. F.
    Ironside, R. A.
    Johi, R.
    Jones, C. H. W.
    Knight, D. E.
    Latham, L.
    MacDonald, B. L.
    Mackauer, J. P. M.
    McClaren, M.
    Munro, J. N.
    Severy, L.
    Sterling, T. D.
    Thomas, S.
    Walker, R. E.
    Walkley, J.
    Webster, J. N.
    Wemyss, I. D.
    Wheatley, J.
    Wilson, B. G.
    H. N. Evans, Secretary
    H. D. Nagel
    S. Roberts
    Absent: Barlow, J. S.
    Cunninghani, A. B.
    Diamond,
    Doherty, P. M.
    Hall, N.
    Hindle, L.
    Martel, A. G.
    Morin
    ?
    (resigned)
    Okuda, K.
    Overholt, N. J.
    Schiffer, R.
    In attendance: Alderson, 'E. W.
    Gibson, E.
    Garland, i.
    Aloi, S.
    Harley, A.

    - 2 -
    ? S.M.
    4/10176
    1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
    It was agreed to accede to a request by R. Walker on behalf lof
    student senators to add to the agenda consideration of a motion relating
    to the potential impact on academic standards Of the current strike.
    The topic would be consider under item 7.
    With this addition the agenda was approved as circulated.
    2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
    The minutes of the Open Session of September 13, 1976 were
    approved as distributed.
    3. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES
    There was no business arising from the minutes.
    4.
    REPORT OF CHAIRMAN
    There was no report.
    5. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES
    1) Senate Nominating Committee
    a) Paper S.76-121 - Senate Elections
    Elections were conducted to fill vacancies on a number of Senate
    Committees. Details of the returns follow:
    e Committee on Academic Planning (SCAP)/ Senate Committee on
    Uni rsitv Bud2et (SCUB
    0
    One lay-member Senator to replace M. J. Overholt for two-year
    term of office to September 30, 1978.
    Declared elected by acclamation:
    M. J. Overholt
    Two senators-at-large to replace J. P. M. Mackauer and K. Oiuda
    and one student-senator to replace L. Severy for two-year t
    i
    prms
    of office to September 30, 1978. ?
    One
    senator-at-large to replace
    F. Cunningham for balance term of office to September 30, 1977.
    Candidates:
    Votes Recorded!:
    A. S. Arrott
    13
    P. Buitenhuis
    18
    ?
    151
    R. K. Debo
    14
    R. Johl
    10
    J.P.M. Mackauer
    18
    ?
    19
    1
    K. Okuda
    28
    L. Severy
    17
    R. E. Walker
    12

    -3-
    ?
    S.M. 4/10/76
    Individuals recording the higher numbers of votes and
    thereby declared elected for terms of office to September
    30, 1978:
    ' senators-at-large ?
    K. Okuda
    J.P.M. Mackauer
    student-senator ?
    L. Severy
    For term of office to September 30, 1977:
    .
    .
    senator-at-large ?
    P. Buitenhuis
    Senate Committee on Agenda and Rules (SCAR)
    Two senators-at-large to replace D. R. Birch and J.P.M. Mackauer
    for two-year terms of office to September 30, 1978.
    Candidates: ?
    Votes Recorded:
    D. R. Birch
    ?
    25
    J. A. Catalano
    ?
    11
    A. E. Curzon
    ?
    27
    R. E. Walker
    ?
    15
    Individuals recording the higher numbers of votes and
    thereby declared elected:
    A. E. Curzon
    D. R. Birch
    Senate Committee on Continuing Studies (SCCS)
    Three faculty-senators to replace P. Buitenhuis, R. L. Carlson,
    and J. Walkley for two-year termsof office to September 30, 1978.
    Declared elected by acclamation:
    ?
    R. L. Carlsoi
    (J. Walkley withdrew his name)
    ?
    D. A. Erickspn
    E. A. FattaK
    One student-senator and one student-senator alternate to replace
    B. E. Emery and L. Severy for two-year terms of office to
    September 30, 1978.
    Cindi
    t1p
    ?
    Votes Recorded!:
    B.E.Emery ?
    29
    N. G. Hall
    ?
    19
    L. Severy ?
    24
    Individual with the highest number of votes and thereby declared
    elected as the regular member :
    ? B. E. Emery
    Individual with the second highest number of votes and the
    declared elected as the alternate member:
    ?
    L. Severy
    (This latter was incorrectly released on Oct.
    4th as N. G. Hall.)

    .
    .
    - 4 -
    ?
    S.M. 4/10/76
    Senate Committee on Honorary Degrees (SCHD)
    One facu1ty-enator from the Faculty of Arts to replace
    E. MacWhinney for no specified term of office.
    Declared elected by acclamation: ?
    P. Buitenhuis
    Senate Library Committee (SLC)
    One student-•enator and one student-senator alternate to
    replace R. A. Ironside and J. A. Catalano for two-year
    terms of office to September 30, 1978.
    Candidates:. ?
    Votes Recorded:
    J. A. Catalano ?
    10
    R. A. Ironside ?
    25
    Declared elected as the regular member: R. A. Ironside
    Declared elected as the alternate member: J. A. Catalano
    Senate Nominating Committee (SNC)
    Four senators-at-large, one student-senator, and one studerft-
    senator alternate to replace F. Cunningham, J. F. Hutchinson,
    W.A.S. Smith, T. D. Sterling, R. Schiffer, and I. D. Weymss for
    one-year terms of office to September 30, 1977.
    Candidates:
    ?
    Votes Recorded
    A.
    E. Curzon
    34
    B.
    E. Emery
    26 ?
    18
    J. F. Hutchinson
    32
    C.
    H. W. Jones
    26
    B. L. MacDonald
    23
    T.
    D. Sterling
    33
    S. Thomas
    34
    I.
    D. Wemyss
    26 ?
    lT
    Individuals recording the higher number of votes and thereby
    declared elected as senators-,t-large:
    A. E. Curzon, S. Thomas
    T. D. Sterling, J F. Hutchinson
    Individual declared elected as regular student-member: B. E. Emery
    Individual declared elected as alternate student-member: I. D. Wemyss.
    0

    5 -
    ?
    S.M. 4/10/7
    Senate Committee on Scholarships, Awards and Bursarjes (SCSAB)
    One lay-member senator to replace L. Latham for two-year term
    of office to September 30, 1978.
    Declared elected by acclamation: ?
    L. Latham
    Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies (SCUS)
    Two student-senators as alternates to replace C. Carlson and
    R. Schiffer for no specified term of office.
    Votes Recordd:
    D. Bitle
    ?
    14
    J. A. Catalano
    ?
    22
    R. E. Walker
    ?
    16
    I. D. Wemyss ?
    22
    Individuals with the higher number of votes and declared elected
    as student-senator alternate members:
    J. A. Catalano
    I. D. Wemyss
    Senate Undergraduate Admissions Board (SUAB)
    One senator-at-large to replace R. K. Debo for two-year
    term of office to September 30, 1978. Two student-senators and
    . ?
    one student-senator alternate to replace R. A. Ironside, B. E. Emery
    and D. Bitle for one-year terms of office to September 30, 1977.
    Candidates: D. Bitle, R. K. Debo, B. E. Emery,
    R. A. Ironside, C. H. W. Jones,
    B. L. MacDonald, R. E. Walker.
    The results of the election as conducted at Senate were
    released at the meeting as R. A. Ironside for two-year term
    as senator-at-large, B. E. Emery and B. L. MacDonald as
    regular student-members, and R. E. Walker as alternate student-
    member. This was then changed to show R. E. Walker as a
    regular member and B. L. MacDonald as alternate and these two
    candidates were immediately informed at the meeting but without full
    announcement as Senate had entered upon other pressing business.
    Note: This election, since the meeting of Senate, was challenged on.t'he
    grounds that the ballot paper named one or more persons who wer
    not nominated and It failed to name persons who were nominated.
    There were verbal attempts at the meeting to correct the error
    after some ballots had been distributed and some marked, and
    possibly some collected. The electoral officer has ruled the e1ection
    and results as declared invalid and election Is scheduled to
    be held at the next meeting of Senate.

    .
    .
    0
    -
    ?
    S.M. 4/10/76
    ii) Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies
    a)
    ?
    S.76-122 - Minor in Education Studies- Faculty of Education
    Moved by D. Birch, seconded by J. Ellis,
    1. "That the prerequisite for the following courses be changed
    from'EDUC 401/402 or equivalent' to 'Not less than 60 hours
    of credit':
    EDUC 421-4 Learning and Evaluation
    EDUC 461-4 Trends and Developments in Educational
    Practice
    EDUC 465-4 Children's Literature
    EDUC 471-4 Curriculum Development: Theory and
    Practice"
    2. "That the following calendar statement describing a Minor in
    Education Studies be approved:
    'MINOR IN EDUCATION STUDIES
    A Student undertaking a degree other than
    la
    Bachelor of Education and who does not intend to
    - undertake P.D.P. may complete a Minor in Eduction
    Studies. The Minor in Education Studies includes
    both lower and upper division credit.
    The lower division credit includes 6 hours of
    Education made up of two of:
    '• EDUC 220-3 Psychological Issues in Education
    EDUC 230-3 Philosophical Issues in Education
    EDUC 240-3 Social Issues in Education
    The upper division credit included 14 to 18
    semester hours of credit from the following courses
    (or approved transfer credit);
    EDUC 421-4 Learning and Evaluation
    EDUC 431-4 Analysis of Educational Concepts
    EDUC 435-4 Educational Theory and Theory of criticism
    EDUC 437-4 Ethics and Education
    EDUC 441-4 Cultural Difference and Education
    EDUC 442-4 Contemporary Issues in World Education
    EDUC 461-4 Trends and Developments in Educational Practice
    EDUC 465-4 Children's Literature
    EDUC 471-4 Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice"
    3.
    "That the calendar statement on page 233 'There aretwo classes
    of Education Minors: general and specific' be amended to
    read 'Two classes of Education Minors, general and specific,
    are offered as part of the Bachelor of Education Degree Program.
    The Faculty also offers a Minor in Education Studies for

    7
    ?
    S.M. 4/10/76
    students in other Faculties.
    ?
    The Minor in Education
    Studies is described on page ...
    ?
    ."
    In response to an enquiry concerning the reason for the
    submission of the proposal it was observed thatthe
    development by the Faculty of Education was in response
    to a series of requests from the former Dean of Science
    who had provided verbal information on the perceived need
    and suitability of such an offering.
    It was further noted that the courses would notbe being
    mounted for any special group but were part of the
    normal offerings in education.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    b) Paper S.76-123 - Centre for the Arts - New course proposals
    Moved by D. Birch, seconded by R. Brown,
    "That Senate approve and recommend to the Board of Governors
    for ?
    approval ?
    the following new courses in Fihe and
    Performing Arts:
    FPA. 116-6 The Arts in Context: North American Styles
    FPA. 160-3 Introduction to the Image
    ?
    I
    FPA. 251-3 Dramatic Interpretation II
    FPA. 382-3 Aesthetics of Performance
    FPA. 384-3 Criticism of Performance"
    E. Alderson, S. Aloi, I. Garland, E. Gibson were in
    attendance to respond to questions.
    In response to an enquiry as to whether there would-be some
    form of introductory or general art history or "history of
    the arts" course, E. Alderson emphasized the need and
    reason for the courses as proposed for background and
    selection but indicated that consideration also is being
    given to an appropriate set of courses to replace the
    current General Studies courses on appreciation.
    ?
    In
    order to keep costs of programs at reasonable levels selectior,
    would be required on the minor programs with open courses
    at the first levels to provide experience in art to as
    many students as possible but with screening to follow. ?
    He
    referred to the proposals as presented earlier to Senate.
    R. Brown indicated that there was approval of budget for the
    current proposals but that there undoubtedly would be
    down-the-road costs if the programs were as successful as
    anticipated.

    8 -
    ?
    S.M. 4/l/76
    B. Wilson indicated funds had been requested in budget as
    provided ?
    to the Universities Council and that Council
    was seeking further data on Fine Arts programs in the
    province.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    c) ?
    Paper S.76-124 - Centre for the Arts - Minor in Dance
    Moved by D. Birch, seconded by R. Brown,
    "That Senate approve (and recommend approval by the Board
    of Governors) a Minor in Dance as set forth in the
    ?
    I
    accompanying paper S.76-124."
    Discussion was held on the large number of credits in lower
    division courses required to enter the minor,with some
    reservations as to the desirability of this.
    ?
    Respons 1 e was
    made emphazing
    ?
    the amount of breadth considered necessary
    in the field of the arts and the need for intensive
    study by dedicated students who would pursue the minor
    in a small but quality program whilst at the same time
    providing open courses for general experience at the
    lower levels to as many students as possible.
    ?
    E. Alderson
    indicated that it was not envisaged that prerequisits to
    a major program would be much larger than those of the
    minor
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    d) Paper S.76-125 - Faculty of Interdisciplinary Studies - New
    Course Proposals Women's Studies
    ?
    -
    Moved by D. Birch, seconded by F. Cunningham,
    "That Senate approve (and recommend approval by the
    Board of Governors) the following new courses, as
    set forth in S.76-125:
    W.S. 300-5 Special Topics in Women's Studies
    W.S. 402-2 Directed Readings
    W.S. 403-3 Directed Readings
    It was noted that the major objectiveof W.S. 300 is
    to provide an opportunity, especially in the case of
    visiting faculty, for taking advantage of specialized
    areas of faculty expertise.
    A number of general questions were raised concernin
    special topics courses and directed readings course.

    _9 -
    ?
    S.M. 4/10/7
    R. Brown indicated that the proposal followed the
    ??
    practice in many departments and that the proposal
    ?
    was much less flexible than the Computing Science
    program. A number of the upper division courses in
    Women's Studies had not been offered yet as there
    was not sufficient faculty for this.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    e) Paper S.76-126 - Guidelines for the Establishment of Ceftificate
    and Degree Programs
    Moved by D. Birch, seconded by J. Blaney,
    "That Senate approve (and recommend approval by the hoard
    of Governors) the guidelines for the establishment
    certificate and diploma programs as contained in paper
    S.76-126 with the exception of sectionIV.2."
    In response to a query from A. Curzon, B. Wilson indicated
    that the Universities Council now had intention to
    identify programs in three categories - those clearly
    falling under Council review, those clearly not falling
    ?
    ?
    under Council review, and those in the middle of the
    ?
    two. He believed these proposals fell in the grey-area
    middle group. P. Jewett stated that the proposals definitely
    would be sent to the Universities Council for inforthation.
    J. Blaney responded to an enquiry concerning the possible
    issue of certificates retroactively, and he indicated
    that this would not be done.
    It was emphasized that section IV.2. on diplomas was not
    included but would come forward separately at some
    future time.
    ?
    I
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    2)
    Paper S.76-127 - Certffft
    ?
    m f
    Moved by D. Birch, seconded by J. Blaney,
    "That Senate approve (and recommend approval by the Board
    of Governors) the establishment of a Certificate Program
    for Senior Citizens and requirements as set forth in
    paper S.76-127."

    _10 -
    ?
    S.M. 4/10/76
    A. Harley was available to answer questions.
    (Correction is required on pages 5 and' 6 of a
    typographical error - Political Science 143-3,
    should be 141-3)
    It was suggested that on page 3, paragraph 2,
    "sympathy with" be changed to "sensitivity to"
    and this was accepted.
    C. Jones raised a number of questions. He was
    informed that the UBC program is non-credit
    whereas this is credit; the rationale for the courses
    and disciplines selected followed review by
    A. Harley on courses given elsewhere for similar
    groups with English ranking first and Psychology second
    and discussion with local senior citizens; that
    there had been discussion a year ago with the Dean of Science
    concerning CHEM 005.
    J. Blaney indicated it was assumed that teaching
    of the courses likely would be on an overload basis.
    It was hoped over time to encourage senior persons
    to continue studies and come to campus.
    MOTION CARRIED
    g) Paper S.76-128 - Program in British Columbia Studies
    Moved by D. Birch, seconded by J. Blaney,
    "That Senate approve (and recommend approval by the
    Board of Governors) the establishment of a Program in
    British Columbia Studies with requirements as set forth
    on pages 4 and 5 of paper S.76-128."
    J. Blaney indicated the program was a response to
    initiation by the Vancouver Centennial Museum, and
    that advertizing would include statement to the
    effect that it is being offered in conjunction with
    that institution.
    There were some concerns that the title was too
    broad for what was included and that a number of
    suitable options were not included. J. Blaney
    indicated that over time there undoubtedly would be
    changes and the adding of some courses.
    A. Arrott expressed concern on the proposal to add further
    off-campus offerings and desired data on direct costs.
    J. Blaney indicated that four courses per year could be
    operated on current budget.
    0

    - 11- ?
    S.M. 4/10/76
    Moved by M. McLaren, seconded by A. Arrott,
    "That the main motion be tabled."
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION: TO TABLE FAILED
    Vote was then undertaken on the main motion.
    MOTION CARRIED
    iii) Senate Committee on Academic Planning
    a)
    Paper S.76-129 - Winegard Commission Report - For Information
    This paper was provided for information.
    b)
    Paper S.76-130 - Winegard Commission Report
    Moved by B. Wilson, seconded by D. Birch,
    "The University is currently reviewing the implications
    of the Winegard Commission report relating to the proposed
    role for Simon Fraser University in interior programming.
    The Senate, however, does not accept the role limitations
    for this University as stated on page 10 of the report."
    P. Buitenhuis who had been a member of the committee did not
    .
    ?
    know of discussion of the roles as they appeared in the report.
    J. Blaney, also a member, indicated •hereT had been discussion
    at the final meeting of the committee and that the stated roles
    had been opposed but now appeared in the report. B. Wilson
    indicated that the other institutions also were opposing the
    roles as suggested.
    Discussion indicated general agreement with the intent of the
    motion but that a wording in a more positive sense would be
    preferred and the secretary was instructed to incorporate a
    number of suggestions made.
    "That the role assumed for Simon Fraser University by the
    Winegard Commission, as stated on page 10 of the report, be
    rejected for the following reasons and that the
    Universities Council be so advised.
    First, the assignment of roles to specific universities was
    not within the terms of reference of the Commission. Second,
    the Commissioner, Dr. Winegard, did not formally discuss this
    question with the University, and these comments are deemed
    only to reflect his preferences. Third, the University has
    long expressed its interest in the development of professional
    programs of an integrated and interdisciplinary nature, several
    0

    - 12 -
    ?
    S.M. 4/10/76
    of which have been successfully implemented. Finally,
    and most important, Simon Fraser University has,
    .
    ?
    since its inception, been committed to graduate work at both
    the masters and doctoral level. Today, fifteen of the
    University's nineteen departments do offer doctoral level
    programs.
    To accept the role restrictions assumed in the Winegard
    Commission Report would be to deny the commitments that
    this University has made over the past ten years to
    high quality graduate teaching and research."
    MOTION AS CHANGED CARRIED
    iv) Senate Committee on Agenda and Rules
    a)
    Paper S.76-131 - Offering of CHEM 420-3, CHEM 423-3, CI-IEM 424-2
    Moved by B. Wilson, seconded by J. Webster,
    "That Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
    Governors, as set forth in S.76-131, that the Department of
    Chemistry be permitted to offer the following Chemistry
    courses earlier approved under Paper S.76-10 (adjusted):-
    CHEM 420-3
    ?
    Clinical Chemistry I
    CHEM 423-3
    ?
    Clinical Chemistry II
    CHEM 424-2 ?
    Clinical Chemistry Laboratory"
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    Moved by J. Catalano, seconded by R. Walker,
    "That the open session be extended to 10:30 p.m."
    Question was called, and a vote taken,
    MOTION TO EXTEND TIME CARRIED
    b)
    Paper S.76-132 - Proposed Placement Testing, English
    Moved by D. Birch, seconded by R. Brown,
    "That Senate approve the participation of Simon Fraser University
    in the development and implementation of the English Placement
    Test proposed by the Department of Education. It is understood
    that this will involve:
    .
    0

    - 13 -
    ?
    S.M. 4/10/76
    [1
    1. The naming (by the President) of an individual to an
    ad hoc committee for refining the objectives of such a
    test.
    2.
    Participation, either directly or through representation
    of the universities generally, in the governing board for
    the test.
    3.
    Making available the data relevant to research associated
    with the development of the test, i.e. high school and
    university English grades.
    4.
    A commitment not to use the test for admissions
    purposes, at least during the two year development period.
    5.
    An opportunity to confirm participation or to opt out after
    the test objectives are further defined in the near future."
    D. Birch described the circumstances leading to the recommendations,
    emphasizing that the intent was for a permission facilitating action
    permit involvement in the current discussions and planning and
    with commitment to come back to Senate when there were more
    substantive developments with full opportunity to opt out at the
    later time. The desire was to be influencing rather than
    being impacted.
    It was agreed to add the word "possible" in the second
    line, preceeding "implementation".
    Moved by L. Severy, seconded by B. Emery,
    "That the topic be referred to SCAP for consideration."
    D. Birch concurred that it was appropriate for the topic to go
    forward to another body, likely SCUS, but that this should
    occur simultaneously whilst the general discussions proceed
    and that time prevented referral without concurrent action.
    P. Jewett indicated that the matter would be placed before
    SCUS to consider directions and to keep a watching brief but that
    this should be done concurrently.
    Question was called on the motion to refer, and a vote taken.
    MOTION TO REFER FAILED
    10 in favor
    21 opposed.
    Amendment was moved by L. Severy, seconded by B. Emery,
    "To delete the last portion of item 4, 'at least during
    the two year development period.' "
    0

    - ?
    - ?
    S.M. 4/10/76
    • ?
    It was again emphasized that item 4 was a required
    commitment from an institution which was prepared to
    participate, calling for a guarantee not to use the proposed
    . test for admission purposes during the development
    period. The intent is for a diagnostic test, with
    appropriate actions to follow.
    Question was called on the amendment, and a vote taken.
    AMENDMENT FAILED
    Vote was then undertaken on the main motion (with the word
    "possible" included)
    MOTION CARRIED
    21 in favor
    9 opposed.
    Moved
    by R. Walker, seconded by R. Debo,
    "That the open session be extended to 11:00 p.m."
    Question was called,
    and a vote taken.
    MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FAILED
    Moved by R. Walker, seconded by D. Knight,
    ?
    ?
    "That the open session be extended to 10:45 p.m."
    Question was
    called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION TO EXTEND TIME CARRIED
    7. OTHER BUSINESS
    ft. Walker provided a statement, moved by R. Walker, seconded
    by-L. Severy, as follows:
    "Whereas it is the express responsibility of this body of
    Senate to deal with matters which speak to the academic
    quality of education at the university and whereas the current
    strike at S.F.U. has as a direct result severely, reduced the
    number and quality of academic services available on
    campus normally expected to maintain academic standards, moved
    that this body of Senate express its concern for the maintenance of
    recognized academic standards at S.F.U. and urge the parties
    to the dispute to take this issue into account in the
    bargaining process."
    0

    -
    ?
    - ?
    S.M. 4/10/76
    R. Walker refr.red to increased load on faculty members,
    reduced library and others hours, availability of
    • ?
    laboratories and of case study materials, as hurting students and
    affecting academic quality. He stressed that the motion
    does not take side but is concerned with academic impact.
    Several senators commented on the degree of inconvenience, noting the
    tolerance and flexibility being displayed by faculty, students
    and administration but were not sure that academic quality is
    yet severely strained but that it may become so. R. Walker
    indicated willingness to have changes made to reflect comments and
    in response to direct question as to whether fault is implied
    he responded that there is no position taken and that the motion
    does not take sides.
    Moved by R. Walker, seconded by B. Wilson,
    - ?
    "That the open session be extended to 10:52 p.m."
    Question was called and a vote taken.
    MOTION TO EXTEND TIME CARRIED
    B. Wilson indicated that he opposed the motion as he
    believed it to be counter-productive particularly as the
    impact could be long-term and not necessarily good.
    D.
    Birch suggested that negotiations best take place at
    the table and outside actions may prove to be bad or
    non-controllable.
    Change was made to the wording of the motion to indicate
    potential impact on academic quality, as follows:
    '!Whereas it is the express responsibility of this body of
    Senate to deal with matters which speak to the academic
    quality of education at the university and whereas the current
    strike at S.F.U. has the potential to sevex1y reduce the
    number and quality of academic services normally expected
    to maintain academic standards, moved that this body
    of Senate express its concern for the maintenance of
    recognized academic standards at S.F.U. and urge the parties
    to the dispute to take this Issue into account in the
    bargaining process."
    Question was called on the motion as changed, and a vote
    taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    16 in favor
    11 opposed.
    .
    (0

    - ?
    - 1.6 -
    ?
    S.M. 4/10/76
    9. INFORMATION
    The Chairman drew attention to the date of the next scheduled meeting
    of Senate - Monday, November 1, 1976, at 7:00 p.m., and declared a
    brief recess at 10:52 p.m., prior to moving into Closed Session.
    H. M. Evans
    Secretary
    S
    9

    Back to top