.
    DRAFT UNTIL APPROVED BY SENATE
    MINUTES OF MEETING OF SENATE OF SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
    HELD MONDAY, OCTOBER 2, 1972, 3172 ADMINISTRATION
    BUILDING, 7:30 P.M.
    OPEN SESSION
    PRESENT:
    ?
    Strand, K.
    Chairman
    Aronoff, S.
    Beirne, B. P.
    Birch, D. R.
    Bradley, R. D.
    Brown, R. ?
    C.
    Cote, P.
    ?
    T.
    Dawson, A. J.
    Doherty, P. M.
    Gilbert, K. L.
    Hollibaugh, A. L.
    Jamieson, D. H.
    Kissner, R. F.
    Lardner, R. W.
    MacPherson, A.
    Mugridge, I.
    Representing B. G. Wilson
    Munro, J. M.
    O'Connell, M. ?
    S.
    Rieckhoff, K. E.
    Robinson, N.
    Salter, J. H.
    Seager, J. W.
    Sullivan, D. H.
    Sutherland, G. A.
    Swangard, E. M.
    Wagner, P. L.
    Weinberg, H.
    Evans, H. M.
    Secretary
    Meyers, D. A.
    Norsworthy, R.
    Recording Secretary
    ABSENT: ?
    Baird, D. A.
    Caple, K. P.
    Copes, P.
    Eliot Hurst, M. E.
    Thunott, A. H.
    Hodge, F. D.
    Nair, K. K.
    Reid, W. D.
    Wheatley, J.
    Williams, W. E.
    0

    - 2-
    ?
    S.M. 2/10/72
    1.
    APPROVAL OF AGENDA
    The agenda was approved as distributed.
    2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
    The minutes of the Open Session of September 11, 1972 were
    approved as circulated.
    3.
    BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES
    There was no business arising from the minutes.
    4. REPORT OF CHAIRMAN
    Papers S.72-113 and S.72-113a - Report on Special Topics and Directed
    Studies Courses. Fall Semester 72-3
    The. Chairman read the motion which had been passed at the August
    1972 meeting of Senate, viz:
    "That Deans of Faculties and Divisions report on topics
    being covered under Special Topics and Directed Studies
    courses during the Fall semester 72-3, with report to be
    available at the October meeting of Senate."
    He noted that an additional paper, S.72-113a, submitted by the PSA
    Department, had been distributed to the assembly. The Deans were then
    asked to comment on the Report.
    K. Rieckhoff felt that there was considerable confusion in the use
    of the terms Directed Readings, Directed Studies, Special Studies, and
    Special Topics, noting that courses with identical descriptions are
    sometimes numbered differently, and suggested that a consistent pattern
    would be useful. D. Sullivan explained the utilization of the various
    expressions in the Department of English to meet the individual require-
    ments of students, but stated that most of the questions were answered in
    the paper, and any problems that might arise through abuse would be
    resolved by the Faculty.
    H. Weinberg enquired whether there is a uniform policy on the matter
    of contact hour teaching credit for faculty, to which I. Mugridge responded
    that with a few exceptions the situation was as described in the paper, the
    normal procedure being not to count these as part of teaching load.
    Moved by K. Rieckhoff, seconded by A. MacPherson,
    "That Papers S. 72-113 and S.72-113a be referred
    to the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies
    .
    ?
    ?
    for its analysis, comments, and recommendations,
    ?
    if any, to Senate."

    .- 3 - ?
    S.M. 2/10/72
    Question was called on the motion to refer, and a vote taken.
    MOTION TO REFER CARRIED
    S. Aronoff enquired if it was possible for a student, having
    taken a directed studies course, to then request and obtain a sub-
    stitution for a required course as outlined in the calendar. The
    Chairman indicated that this was similar to other questions recently
    raised at Senate, and the questions are under consideration for
    report.
    5. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES
    1. Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies
    1. Paper S.72-114 - Division of General Studies - New Course,
    Proposals - Computer Science CMPT 100-3, CMPT 102-2
    Moved by R. Brown, seconded by A. Hollibaugh,
    "That Senate approve the new course proposals of
    the Division of General Studies, as set forth in
    Paper S.72-114 for Computer Science 100-3 - Intro-
    duction to Concepts and Procedures in Computer
    . ?
    Science, and Computer Science 102-2 - Introduction
    to PL/1 Programming."
    K. Rieckhoff commented that there was overlap between the new
    course 100-3 and Math 106, and R. Brown explained that the Mathematics
    Department had agreed to revise the overlapping portion of Math 106.
    R. Lardner confirmed that the revision would be submitted to Senate.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    Moved by R. Brown, seconded by A. Hollibaugh,
    "That Senate waive the normal two semester time
    lag requirement to permit offering of Computer
    Science 100-3 commencing in the Spring Semester
    1973, and of Computer Science 102-2 commencing
    in the Summer Semester 1973."
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    C

    - 4 -
    ?
    S.M. 2/10/72
    2. Paper S.72-115 - Division of General Studies - New Course
    Proposal - GS 101-3 - Formal Development of the Symphony
    Moved by R. Brown, seconded by A. Hollibaugh,
    1. ?
    'That Senate approve the new course proposal of
    the Division of General Studies, as set forth in
    S.72-115 for General Studies 101-3 - Formal
    Development of the Symphony."
    K. Rieckhoff objected to Fine Arts courses being brought for-
    ward in piece meal fashion in advance of the establishment of a
    complete program in Fine Arts, noting that the current proposal
    would represent a third course in Fine Arts. He was concerned that
    approval could lead to a de facto situation which might be prejudicial
    to the best development of a program and did not consider this an
    appropriate procedure.
    R. Brown referred to Motion 2, noting that the matter had been
    discussed at some length at SCUS, with the result that the Committee
    had proposed a motion calling for review of the currently proposed
    course as and when the Fine Arts program and courses were under con-
    sideration. He was concerned that there was considerable demand for
    this particular course and that it would probably be some two years
    • ?
    before a comprehensive Fine Arts program could be introduced. He
    believed the proposal would satisfy the current situation and would
    not necessarily prejudice appropriate program development.
    K. Rieckhoff felt that this was circumventing the activities of
    the Academic Planning Committee for appropriate overall planning.
    Introduction of the course would call for commitment of teaching
    resources with some shift in current utilization of that teaching
    resource. There had been no priority assessment as would normally
    be undertaken through the Academic Planning Committee, and he was
    concerned that such priority assessment in relation to other proposed
    courses might give different results.
    R. Brown responded that the Division of General Studies has two
    main functions, one of which is to house programs not properly housed
    elsewhere, and the other is to provide for courses not clearly fitting
    in other areas. This course fell in the latter category.
    D. Sullivan expressed his belief that many of the courses of this
    type were to be offered on a one-time basis only. He believed that
    General Studies could look annually at such offerings and establish
    priorities within the offerings. He wished the matter of one-time
    offerings considered.
    R. Brown noted that in the courses already approved by Senate
    there had been only one course specified to be a one-time offering
    . ?
    only. He felt there was need for clarification on this matter. He
    was not strongly opposed to the suggestion, but noted that there were
    some problems relating to clearing followup approvals in sufficient
    time for the offering of courses where demand was obvious and success
    of the course was not in doubt.

    . ?
    - 5 -
    ?
    S.M. 2/10/72
    D. Sullivan and D. Birch were of the opinion that, pending
    establishment of the proposed new program, the course should be
    offered once only to avoid a long term commitment of teaching
    resources. An amendment was proposed by K. Rleckhoff, "That to
    Motion 1 there be added, 'this course to be offered once in the
    Spring semester 1973," but the amendment failed for lack of a
    seconder.
    Question was called on Motion 1, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    Moved by R. Brown, seconded by A. Hollibaugh,
    2. "That the course GS 101-3 - Formal Development
    of the Symphony be reviewed when any proposal
    for a Fine and Performing Arts program and
    courses is under consideration for approval."
    A substitute motion was moved by D. Birch, seconded by K.
    Rieckhoff,
    "That GS 101-3 not be offered a second time
    prior to a review by the Senate Committee on
    Undergraduate Studies and Senate."
    Question was called on the substitute motion, and a vote taken.
    SUBSTITUTE MOTION CARRIED
    Moved by R. Brown, seconded by K. Gilbert,
    3.
    "That Senate waive the normal two semester
    time lag requirement to permit the offering
    of GS 101-3 commencing in the Spring Semester
    1973."
    K. Rieckhoff requested that the word "commencing" be deleted
    from Motion 3. As there was no objection, the word was removed and
    the motion then read as follows:
    "That Senate waive the normal two semester
    time lag requirement to permit the offering
    of GS 101-3 in the Spring Semester 1973."
    Question was called on Motion 3, as altered, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    3. Paper S.72-116 - Faculty of Education - Retitling Recently
    Approved Courses, Ed.220-3, Ed.230-3, Ed.240-3
    Moved by D. Birch, seconded by K. Rieckhoff,

    1
    .-
    6 -
    ?
    S.M. 2110/72
    That Senate approve the request of the Faculty
    of Education, as set forth in S.72--116 to re-
    title recently approved courses as follows:
    Education 220-3 - Psychological Issues in Education
    Education 230-3 - Philosophical Issues in Education
    Education 240-3 - Social Issues in Education.'
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    MOTION CARRIED
    6.
    REPORTS OF FACULTIES AND DIVISIONS
    There were no reports from Faculties or Divisions.
    7. OTHER BUSINESS
    1.
    Notice of Motion
    There were no notices of motion.
    2.
    Date of Next Meeting
    It was noted that the next meeting of Senate is scheduled for
    Monday, November 6, 1972, at 7:30 p.m.
    3.
    Other Items
    K. Rieckhoff noted that Senators had received a report submitted by
    the Division of Continuing Education, but the item had not been included
    on the agenda. The Chairman advised that the paper had not been submitted
    to the Secretary or to the Senate Agenda Committee, but that it would
    appear on the agenda for the November 6, 1972 meeting of Senate.
    H. Weinberg enquired about development of University policy in con-
    nection with certification of the ethics of research proposals submitted
    to the National Research Council. I. Mugridge indicated establishment
    of a committee but it was not the intention to involve Senate in discussions.
    E. Swangard asked for the policy governing the Division of General
    Studies, and was advised that the paper approved by Senate was numbered
    S.424 Revised. The Chairman added that it was his intention to review
    that document in view of the earlier discussion.
    R. Kissner enquired if Senators could be provided with a list of
    faculty members holding tenure, and the Chairman responded that the matter
    was not within the terms of reference of Senate.
    4.
    Confidential Matters
    The Open Session of Senate recessed briefly at 8:50 p.m. prior to
    moving into Closed Session.
    H. M. Evans
    Secretary

    Back to top