1. ?hh?
  2. O" A, 0( &^
  3. s m I11h

DRAFT UNTIL APPROVED BY SENATE
MINUTES OF THE SENATE OF SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
HELD IN THE BOARD AND SENATE ROOM
-
ON MONDAY, JANUARY 9, 1967, AT 1:30 PM.
.
PRESENT:
P.D. McTaggart-Cowan
D. Berg
T.B. Bottomore
A.E. Branca
F.
Candelaria
J.L. Dampier
A.J. Ellis
C.J. Frederickson
W.M. Hamilton
R.J.C. Harper
g. Sperling
G.
Kirchner
I.
Kcerner
E.S. Lett
S.K. Lower
A.R. MacKinnon
J.
Mills
K.E. Rieckhoff
A.M. Unrau
W. Vidaver
W.H. Whiteley
W. Williams
D.P. Robertson
M. Dawson
ABSENT: R.J. Baker
M. Bawtree
J.F. Ellis
A.F.C. Hean
C.H. McLean
G.N. Perry
G.M. Shrum
IN ATTENDANCE
D. Roberts, Information Officer
Chairman
Secretary
Recording Secretary

2
b16 7
1.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
d
On page 4, Item 3E (1), add:
"History 491-3 (Honors Seminar) - Research Methods"
On page 5, Item 3E (2), add:
"Calendar changes;
Department of Economics and Commerce. change semester hours
credit of 370-5 Business Management from 5-to 3
Department of Modern Languages. Change vector of French 100-3,
French 101-3, Spanish 100-3, Spanish 101-3, Russian 101-3,
German 100-3, German 101-3 from (1-5-2) to (1-1-3).
Change vector of 220-3 (Linguistics) and 221-3 (Linguistics)
from (2-1-0) to (2-1-1).'
These amendments to the course offerings for the Spring Semester 1967
were approved at the Meeting of Senate on December 5, 1966, but inadvertently
left out of the Minutes. With these amendments the Minutes as distributed were
approved.
2. BUSINESS ARISING
The Faculty of Education Committee on General Education put forward a
proposal to establish a University Coordinating Committee on General Education,
and a paper setting out its proposed makeup and terms of reference was distributed:
"1. NAME -
The
Committee shall be known as the Coordinating Committee
on General Education.
2. MEMBERSHIP - The Committee shall consist of seven faculty members
and the Coordinating Secretary. The coordinating Secretary shall be
a non-voting member. The faculty members shall serve on the Committee
for a period of two years. The Committee shall elect its own chairman.
3.
METHOD OF APPOINTMENT - Each of the three Centres of the Faculty of
Education shall elect a representative to the Committee. To
representatives shall be elected by the Faculty of Arts, and two by
the Faculty of Science.
4.
DUTIES - The Committee shall review the programs being offered in
General Education in the University, and be responsible for
recommending extensions or revisions to the existing General Education
Program. The Coordinating Secretary shall disseminate information
about the General Education Program to faculty and students, assist in
locating facilities within the University for General Education
offerings, survey programs being offered, solicit recommendations for
extensions to the Program, and act as secretary to the Committee.
/5...

,
q/47
3
ey
.
5. OPERATION - The Committee shall meet as often as necessary to perform
its functions as in (4) above. The Committee's recommendations
regarding the General Education Program will be made directly to the
Faculties or to the Department or Centre concerned.
The Faculty's Committee on General Education recommends the immediate
establishment of a University Coordinating Committee on General Education
and the immediate appointment of the Coordinating Secretary. "
Moved by A.R. MacKinnon, seconded by K.E. Rieckhoff
"that the proposal to set up a University Coordinating
Committee on General Education be adopted"
CARRIED
Moved by K.E. Rieckhoff, seconded by S.K. Lower
"that the composition of the Committee should include one
e-
irem
ie
rPpoI
Pr
4I-ei Faculties
of Arts and Science, instead of two elected representatives"
it
CARRIED
Moved by S.K. Lower, seconded by K.E.Reickhoff
C
"that the Committees terms of reference be extended to include
discussion of the general problem of liberality of the curriculum
of the three faculties and to coordinate the activities in the
three faculties and develop general University policy in this area"
CARRIED
3. NEW BUSINESS
A.
Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Interdisciplinary Programs
The Ad Hoc Committee on. Interdisciplinary Programs had been unable to
conclude its deliberations and report to the Senate within the time
limit set owing to the absence from the campus of several members.
The Senate reserved its discussion for Item 3B, but enjoined the
Ad Hoc Committee to report to Senate at its meeting on February 6 1967.
/3..B...

M 9 11/6 1
4
. 3.
B. Undergraduate Calendar 196768
The following amendments to the draft presented by the Registrar
were proposed:
Chapt en
La3e 13
It was proposed that the names of senators holding temporary
office during the absence of the elected holder should be
annotated in some way. It was also suggested that before the
next issue of the Calendar Deans should consult their Faculties
to see if they were in favour of including given names in
Calendar listings of Faculty.
It was proposed to delete a reference to "Two General Education
courses are required before graduation, but there are no semester
hours credit attached to them." The Registrar said that General
Education is mentioned throughout the Calendar and if the
Faculty of Education proposal were approved there would be a great
deal of editing required. It was agreed to decide the question
of deletion after a decision had been made about the entry under
General Education.
.
Chapter I was agreed with no further amendments.
Chapter II - Admission and Registration
Page 32 -.Mature Students
A discussion took place on the wording requiring two letters of
reference from close acquaintances. It was felt that close acquaintances
were not the best people to give letters of reference for academic
studies. However, after discussion the meeting agreed that this
phrase met the requirement of pointing out to the applicant that he
should ask people who know him reasonably well and are also able to
assess his academic ability, to write letters of reference for him.
It was further agreed that the statement of the reasons why the
applicant wishes to proceed to a university degree and an indication
of the program which he wishes to pursue should be combined.
/Pages...

D% 4
c1/,/e;7
5
to
Pages 35,36 and 37
It was agreed that the composite table listing the courses to be
offered in the summer and fall and spring semesters be deleted
from the Calendar. It was felt that this table had now grown so
large that it was not a very useful guide for the student, and
in fact may serve to confuse him.
Chapter III - General Regulations
Page 40
There was some discussion on the deletion of the requirement of
the $5.00 fee to accompany requests for re-reading of answer papers.
It was pointed out that the Faculty of Arts and the Faculty of
Education had both agreed to this deletion. The Registrar
supported the move to eliminate the $5.00 fee as experience has
shown that more students bypassed the $5.00 fee than paid it.
Instructors were willing to look at a student's paper and term
work and check his grades without him paying the fee, and it was
therefore an injustice to those students
observed the regulation
and paid the $5.00.
A vote was taken and it was agreed that the $5.00 fee should be eliminated
and that the wording submitted by the Registrar for the reconsideration
of grades should be accepted.
Page 41 - Letter Grade DEF
D. Berg questioned the wording of the paragraph referring to the
/
letter grade DEF and asked why it had been changed from the 1966-67
Calendar. It was pointed out that the wording had been changed by
the Senate in May of 1966 and that a supplement to the 1966-67
Calendar containing this new wording had be issued by the Registrar.
The Registrar repotted that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate
Admissions and Standings had discussed the problem arising from the
letter grade DEF and was preparing a proposal for Senate. Essentially,
the proposal will be that instructors be permitted to give the
gre DEF without having to consult the Registrar and that the grades
DEF be removed from the student's transcript and automatically converted
to N's after a certain period of time had elapsed.
The Registrar reported that there were difficulties in administering
the wording as it stood at the moment, inasmuch as the short period
of time allowed to process the examination grades did not leave room
for consultation between the instructor and the Registrar as was the
intention of the wording.
/Page...

[I
A 7
6
Page 41 - Credit for the Semester
It was agreed to add the words "credit may be granted for a course
once only." This was a recommendation of the Undergraduate
Calendar Committee in order to point out to the students that if
they re-register in a course which they have already passed, they
may be able to raise their grade but they will not e able to add
additional credits to their total.
Chapter IV - Fees
Page 45
The statement that students who are applying for a Canada Student
Loan should try to make arrangements to pay fees from other sources
as loans cannot be authorized until the student is officially
registered was queried. After discussion, it was agreed that the
wording of this paragraph gave the Registrar and the Bursar the necessary
discretion in dealing with students who cannot complete payment of
fees at registration and that the system works well now and wording
should therefore remain the same.
The Registrar pointed out that the Bursar now allows students to
register who have at lea't $75.00 in some form or another and those
who do not have the $75.00 and who are applying for a Canada Student
Loan are usually allowed to go to the Bank and complete their Canada
Student Loan form so that their fees can be paid later on in the
registration period.
Page 46
A.R. MacKinnon requested that the reference to Stage 1 and Stage 2
of the Professional Development Program be altered as the Stage 1
and Stage 2 reference had now been dropped.
Page
It was pointed out that the fee schedule seems inconsistent in that the
fees for students registered for a program of 11 or less semester hours
of credit is $15.00 per semester and that as soon as they reach
12 semester hours, the fees jump to $214.00. The President explained
that this had probably arisen as a result of a last minute change in
fee schedule prior to registration in the fall of 1965, and that no
adjustment had been made in the per semester hour fee. He requested
that Senate not recommend any changes to the fee schedule at this time
as the University was committed to holding the line on fee increases
unless absolutely necessary, which he took to be an increase in part-
time student fees as well as full time student fees. It was agreed
that the schedule should stand as it is.
/Chapter 5...
L.

'5M
qIiI
7
Chapter 5 - Faculty of Arts
Pag 52
A lengthy discussion took place on the number of semester hours which a
department may require in the first four levels of the general and
honors program. T.B. Bottomore reported that the Faculty of Arts had
considered allowing the departments to require no more than 18 hours
but that the Faculty meeting had changed this to 24 hours in order to
accommodate the Department of Modern Languages and the Department of
Economics and Commerce.
A suggestion was made that the requirement should remain at 18 hours
and that a footnote should be inserted pointing out that the Department
of Modern Languages and the Department of Economics and Commerce
required more than the 18 hours recommended by the Faculty.
It was decided, however, that since the Faculty meeting had agreed
on 24 hours that this should stand.
Moved by T.B. Bottomore, seconded by G. Sperling
that Senate should express extreme concern at the amount of
time that may be required by a Department in the first four
levels and would like the Faculty of Arts to discuss this
matter further and at the same time to consider whether, if
the need for a greater number of hours relates only to one or
two departments, those departments should be specifically
identified as exceptions to a general rule."
CARRIED
Page 56
It was agreed that the last sentence after the Faculty Listing
such as several additional appointments to be made before September
1967" should be deleted. This statement has some meaning for
graduate student applicants perhaps, but not for undergraduates.
Page 76 - Department of English
It was pointed out that the Department of English course numberings
at the 400 level w'e in error and it was agreed that the Department
should be requested to consult with the Registrar to straighten out
the confusion. The difficulty arises because the 400 level English
courses are offered in two parts, one as a 3 credit lecture, and the
other as a two credit tutorial. The course numbers should therefore
read something as follows:
/401-3...

?hh?
(

Back to top


O" A, 0(
&^
8
English 401-3 Chaucer
English 451-2 Chaucer tutorial.
This will convey to the student and to anyone reading the
transcript the way in which these courses are offered. J.Mills
pointed out that most students will take both of them for the
five credits but that the odd student does take the lecture
in one course and a tutorial in another. With the change in
the course numbers, it will be necessary to change the honors
seminar numbers from the 450 series to the 490 series.
Mved by T.B. Bottomore, seconded by LMills
"that Senate approve this method of numbering English
courses in the 1967-68 Calendar and also approve the
offering of these courses in the Summer of 1966 and the
Fall of 1966, and request the Registrar to make the students'
records conform to this new method of numbering the courses."
CARRIED
It was
also
suggested and agreed to that the Department of English
submit these proposals to the Arts Faculty curriculum Committee
for endorsement and transmission to the Faculty 'of Arts and that
meanwhile, these proposed amendments be approved by Senate.
Page 91
W. Williams pointed out that there was an error in the typescript
for the requirements for majors and honors students in the 5th to
8th levels in the Department of History: rather than honors students
requiring 42 hours of course work in History, it should read
52 hours, and rather than being divided into six 400 level courses
and four honors courses, it should read divided into eight 400 level
courses and four honors courses. This amendment was agreed to.-
Page 104 -
tment of Modern Languages
The Department of Modern Languages submission was discussed with
respect to the number of hours which the department requires a
student to take during the first four levels. It appeared from the
typescript that the Department was asking for 25 hours rather than
the minimum of 24 hours which they are permitted to do under the General
Regulations. It was agreed that T.B. Bottomore should discuss this
matter with the Department of Modern Languages and request that the
Department reduce the requirements to the minimum permitted under the
.
General Regulations.
/The...

Back to top


s m I11h
The Senate also questioned the comment in brackets after the
introductory Hindi course description, namely
'The introduction
of this program is in the nature of an experiment'. It was
commented that all courses are somewhat experimental and while the
note seemed to be intended to convey that there would be no
guarantee made that further Hindi courses would be offered, it did
provide an opening for misinterpretation. TB, Bottomore was
requested to consult with the Head of the Department of Modern
Languages about this comment.
The rest of the Faculty of Arts departmental section was approved
without amendment.
Page 166- Faculty of Education. Physical Development
A lengthy discussion ensued on what to do with the Calendar material
for the Interdisciplinary Program for the Study of Human Movement
as the Committee set up to discuss this matter had not been able
to prepare the report for this meeting
The main bone of contention
seemed to be the type of degree that could be offered for such a
program It was suggested that the copy as presented by the Faculty
of Education be included in this draft Calendar and that by the
time the Committee had reported and Senate had met again the Calendar
should be at the page-proof stage and it would be a simple matter to
delete or alter this program if the Committee recommendation was that
this should be done.
It was agreed to follow the above course of action with the understanding
that the inclusion of t:iis material in the draft Calendar in no way
conveyed Senate's approval of the program or of any degree for the program
but was an expedient taken by Senate in order to let the Calendar go
forward to the printer.
Page 173 - Faculty of Science
There was considerable discussion on the differnces in requirements for
an Arts degree as compared to a Science degree.
Moved by T.B. Bottomore,seconded by G.Sperling
"that Senate express its deep concern to the Science Faculty
with the fact that there appears to be no limitation on the
requirements which a department in the Faculty of Science can
impose on a student in the first four levels and requests
the Faculty of Science to reconsider its program with a view to
liberalizing it".
CARRIED
/After...

'M
7
tA.
10
Is
After further discussion
Moved by LB. Bottomore, seconded by G.Sperling
"that the Science Faculty and in particular the
Departments of Physics and Chemistry be asked by
Senate to examine the course requirements, particularly
in the first four levels and see what positive action
they can take to secure greater freedom of choice for the
students in Science".
CARRIED
Page 179 - Department of Biology
It was agreed to change the title of course 202-3 Human Genetics
to Genetics, and to change the title and description of
402 - Physiological Genetics - Advanced Problems in the Nature
and Function of Genetic Material.
Chapter XI - Financial Aid to Students
The question of scholarships with restrictive conditions was
discussed. The Registrar said that it had been pointed out to
him that the Leonard Foundation Scholarship has the following
provisions:
'That those eligible must be of the white race,
of British nationality, and of the Christian religion in its
Protestant form'.
Moved by A.E. Branca, seconded by R.J.C. Harper
"that scholarships with restrictive conditions such as those
of the Leonard Foundation Scholarship not be listed in
the Calendars of Simon Fraser University".
CARRIED
Approval of Undergraduate Calendar
Moved by K.E. Rieckhoff, seconded by R.J.C. Harper
that the Undergraduate Calendar as amended be approved'.
CARRIED
/3.C...

spp1
7
11
3. C. Graduate Calendar 1967-68
The draft Calendar was approved with the changes suggested
by the Senate Graduate Studies Committee and other editorial
amendments.
The following new graduate courses were aproved for offering
in the Spring Semester 1967:
History 800-5
Seminar in Historiography
Physics 871-4
Nuclear Physics. Selected Topics from
Modern Nuclear Theory.
Developent of Graduate Work at Simon Fraser
The President said that he had received a memorandum from
C.D. Nelson regarding the development of graduate work and
had subsequently had a lengthy discussion with him on this
question.
As a result of this he wanted to pose some questions for
Senate that he felt should be tackled soon. One of these was
the extent to which graduate students at Simon Fraser should
be involved in the challenges and tribulations of academic instruction.
Some of them were involved as Teaching Assistants, but this
• may not go far enough. All students at the master's and doctor's
level could be exposed to discussion on where education is going.
Could this be done without lengthening the degree program?
It was suggested that the need might be met by holding a general
seminar for students of all faculties, and by holding frequent
meetings with Teaching Assistants on the technique of tutorial
leadership; encouragement of innovations by Teaching Assistants
themselves in running their tutorials; and exposure of graduate
students to large classes when they feel they are ready to lecture
to groups.
Members felt that what was required was a coordinated program and
it was questioned whether there was any organisation for adminstering
the programs within each department, and whether there was any
administrative machinery for exchange of views between departments.
It was agreed that the Senate Committee on Graduate Studies should
explore the subject further and perhaps prepare discussion papers for
the Faculties.
-
3. D and 3.E.
It was agreed to carry these items over to the next Meeting.
.
/4...
-p

• .':
12
4.
OTHER BUSINESS
A.
New appointments to the Joint Board of Teachers
The President said that for the past three years Mr.Frederickson and
Professor Baker had been Senate members appointed by the Board, and
President's alternate, and now wished to be relieved of these duties.
Moved by K.E. Rieckhoff, seconded by G.Kirchner
• "that Dr;W.Vidaver replace Mr.C.J. Frederickson as the
Senate's nominee to the Joint Board, and Professor F.Cunningham
be the President's alternate".
CARRIED
B.
Senate Committee on Honorary Degrees
Moved by G. Kirchner, seconded by R.J.C. Harper
"that W. Williams replace T.H. Brose as a member of this
Coninittee".
CARRIED
C.
Academic Planning
The President said that agreement had been reached to establish
an Advisory Committee on Long Range Academic Planning, consisting
of the Dean of each Faculty, one additional member from each
Faculty, one member from the Board of Governors, one lay member
of the Senate, and the Director of University Affairs.
Moved by A.R. MacKinnon, seconded by K. Rieckhoff
"that the Hon.Wm.Hamilton be appointed as the Senate's
representative on the Long Range Academic Planning Committee".
CARRIED
D.
Program for Convocation Founders
The President told Senate that there had been no official visit
from the Visitor, Lt.Governor the Hon.George R.Pearkes, since the
installation ceremonies, and also nothing had been done to bring
Convocation Founders on campus for well over a year.. Now that two
or three candidates had qualified for the Master's degree it was
felt that this should be a suitable reason for arranging a program
for Convocation Founders. A date in February had been tentatively set.
Senate agreed that the matter should be taken to the Board of
Governors.

13
i
s4.
E. Convocation in May
,
- Speaker
It was agreed that everyone in the University should inform the
Registrar of the name of the best speaker that they know. A
speaker would be drawn from this list by the Senate Committee
on Honorary Degrees. The deans were asked to disseminate this
information.
5.
DATE OF NEXT MEETING
The next Meeting of Senate will be Monday 6 February, 19'7, at
1.30 PM.
The Meeting adjourned at 7 PM.
D.P. Robertson
Secretary
0

Back to top