DRAFT UNTIL APPROVED BY SENATE
    MINUTES OF THE SENATE OF SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
    HELD IN THE BOARD AND SENATE ROOM
    ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 3, 1966, AT 1:30 PM -
    PRESENT:
    P.
    D.
    R.
    M.
    T.
    A.
    T.
    J.
    J.
    F.
    E.
    A.
    J.
    K.
    A.
    W.
    S.
    F.
    D.
    ABSENT:
    G.
    A.
    W.
    Ar
    C.
    I.
    C.
    C.
    E.
    G.
    D. McTaggart-Cowan
    Chairman
    A.
    Baird
    J. Baker (from 2:35)
    Bawtree
    B. Bottomore
    E. Branca
    H. Brose
    L. Dampier (from 2:30)
    F. Ellis
    J. Frederickson
    S. Lett
    R. MacKinnon
    Mills
    E. Riekhoff
    M. Unrau
    Vidaver
    K. Lower
    Candelaria
    P. Robertson
    Secretary
    L. Bursill-Hall
    J. Ellis
    M. Hamilton
    ro1d F. C. Hean
    Kirchner
    Koerner
    H. MëLean
    N. Perry
    M. Shoemaker
    M. Shrum
    IN ATTENDANCE:
    D. Roberts - Information Officer
    The Chairman announced that he wished to depart from the order
    of the agenda and consider items 3H. and 4.B., relative to the appoint-
    ment of two members of Senate, so that the nominees who were waiting
    outside could be asked to take their place at the meeting without
    delay. This was agreed upon.
    3 H. SCIENCE REPRESENTATIVE ON SENATE
    Moved by K. E. Rieckhoff, seconded by D. A. Baird
    "that for the period of time that K. E. Rieckhoff serves as
    Acting Dean of Science, S. K. Lower serve in his place as
    Faculty Representative on Senate"
    CARRIED

    -2-
    c&4U—.
    4 B. ARTS REPRESENTATIVE ON SENATE
    Moved by F.
    J.
    Frederickson, seconded by W. Vidaver
    "that for the period of time that D. H. Sullivan is
    absent from the University, F. Candelaria serve in
    his place as Arts Faculty representative on Senate"
    CARRIED
    The two newly appointed members were invited into the meeting and
    were introduced to the members of Senate.
    The Chairman then reported that he had asked D. Roberts, the Information
    Officer, to attend the meeting, in accordance with the motion passed at a
    previous meeting. He then introduced Mr. Roberts to the members.
    1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
    On page 2. in the first line of the fourth paragraph the word
    "course" was changed to "coarse". On the same page, second line,?
    T. H. Brose requested the words "as a means of overcoming the problem
    of reconciling the letter system with the numerical system" be changed
    to " for purposes of symmetry ".
    With the foregoing changes the minutes of August 29, 1966, were
    approved as distributed..
    The Registrar asked the members if, in view of the wider dis-
    tribution of the minutes, they wished to continue with minutes as now
    written or if they preferred to make some suggestion for change.
    T. B. Bottomore stated that he would prefer that the minutes be
    written as they have been thus far.
    M. Bawtree recommended as a means of safeguarding the members
    from any adverse effects resulting from statements recorded in the
    minutes incorrectly that the minutes circulated be marked "Draft.
    until approved by Senate."
    The Registrar reported a request from A. MacPherson that supporting
    papers be circulated to the departments with the minutes. The Chairman
    stated that the minutes do refer to documentation that Senate has
    before it and minutes circulated without the supporting papers, make
    understanding imperfect.
    J.
    Mills recommended that the agenda also be sent to departments..
    T. B. Bottomore recommended that the question be deferred in
    order to permit a proper study of the papers involved over a period
    of time.
    The Chairman suggested the agenda be circulated with the minutes
    together with those supporting papers referred to in the minutes if
    required for a proper understanding of the minutes.
    - 3 -

    'W!3
    .
    J. F. Ellis pointed out that some papers should not be circu-
    lated - such as statements of marks and discipline cases.
    T. H. Brose recommended that it be left to the discretion of the
    Secretary to decide which papers should be sent out.
    Moved by W. Vidaver, seconded by D. A. Baird
    "that if the Registrar, in preparing the minutes, finds it
    necessary to refer to a paper, this paper becomes a part of
    the minutes and should be attached"
    E. S. Lett recommended that the words "at the discretion of
    the Registrar" be added.
    The Chairman stated that the cases in mind could be where indi-
    viduals are involved and the subject is not public property.
    The Chairman then asked for a vote on the motion by W. Vidaver,
    seconded by D. A. Baird, with the amendment recommended by E. S. Lett,
    "that if the Registrar, in preparing the minutes, finds it neces-
    sary to refer to a paper and that paper is necessary for proper
    understanding of the minutes, it becomes a part of the minutes
    and should be attached, at the dicretion of the Registrar"
    CARRIED
    Moved by J. Mills, seconded by T. H. Brose, that the agenda be
    circulated to faculty offices with the minutes.
    CARRIED
    2.
    BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES
    The Registrar reported that in according with the decision of
    Senate at its meeting of August 29th he had applied for membership
    in SACU for the University and had made it clear that this did not
    mean the University was committed to use the tests developed by the
    Service. He then read the letter received from SACU confirming that
    the membership was perfectly valid and acceptable on the basis
    specified. (Attached)
    3 A. STUDENT REPRESENTATIVE ON SENATE
    1) Eligibility, to vote
    The members considered the request of the President of the
    Student Society that Senate reconsider its decision that students
    with 12 semester hours or more would be the only eligible voters
    on the election of a Student Representative on Senate
    Moved by K. E. Rieckhoff, seconded by C. J. Frederickson
    "that the decision of Senate to require a student to be
    enroled twelve semester hours or more to be eligible to
    vote be reaffirmed"
    CARRIED
    -4-

    /D,6.d1
    2) Distribution of Senate minutes to Student Society
    Senate considered the request from the President of the
    Student Society for Senate minutes for each of the Fall meetings.
    After considerable discussion the Chairman recommended that
    the Registrar write a report on each meeting of Senate and send
    the summary report to the President of the Student Society, the
    Peak, and any other party who was interested. This report could
    be written so that supporting papers would not be necessary.
    It was pointed out that it could be assumed that the Student
    Representative, who will receive all documentation for Senate,
    will communicate matters of importance to the students.
    A. R. MacKinnon recommended that there should be a place
    where the minutes with the papers are available.
    J. Mills amended his motion to state
    "that the request of the Student Society to have Senate minutes
    provided be met by making the Library copy of the minutes
    available to students"
    The Chairman then called for a vote in two parts for the motion
    by J. Mills, seconded by A. R. MacKinnon
    "that the Registrar be requested to prepare a summary
    to be distributed freely in the community"
    CARRIED
    "that the agenda, supporting papers and minutes be kept
    in the Library and made available upon request to any
    member of the University community: the papers for this
    copy to be subject to the discretion of the Registrar"
    T. B. Bottomore stated that he felt this was getting away from
    the idea of minutes: that they were for the information of those
    who discuss the business of the meetings and the business of the
    meetings would be deteriorated by such action. He prefers that
    the minutes of a meeting of any body be confined to the membership
    of that body: to go beyond this is to restrict open discussion.
    He stated he was opposed to circulating the minutes.
    T. H. Brose stated that he did not believe candor would restrict
    the body: that since Senate did not have Proceedings, as did the
    House of Commons, minutes and papers were the record of Senate
    and he believed people on campus should have that record available.
    The Chairman then called for a vote on the second part of the
    motion.
    CARRIED
    -5-

    4 .
    6
    Bloc)
    16fo
    -
    5 -
    Procedures for Election of Student Representative
    The Registrar requested a ruling on his suggestion that nomination
    forms for nomination of a student representative required twenty
    signatures.
    Moved by R. J. Baker, seconded by J. F. Ellis
    "that nomination forms for the student representative should
    require twenty signatures"
    CARRIED
    3 F. REQUEST FROM OMBUDSMAN FOR MINUTES OF SENATE
    Moved by J. Lawrence Dampier, seconded by F. Candelaria
    "that the summary report of Senate meetings be sent to
    the Ombudsman and he be advised that copies of Senate
    agenda, minutes and papers will be available in the
    Library"
    CARRIED
    The Registrar will refer the question of the other minutes
    requested to the appropriate bodies.
    3 C. REPORT ON EARLY ADMISSION STUDENTS
    The Registrar reported that the mean point average for the summer
    semester students was 2.14, while that of the early admission students
    was 2.67. It was his opinion that from this report it was evident
    that
    '
    there was no reason to question the early admissions program.
    J. F. Ellis asked about the five students of the early admission
    group whp had not been interviewed. The Registrar stated that if so
    instructed he would arrange to interview the other five students.
    J. F. Ellis recommended that a rport on all these students be sent
    to the schools. The Registrar reported that he intended to send it
    to a number of people, including the B.C. Studerct Loan Commit 'tee and
    the Department of Education. It was agreed that a number of people
    would be interested in a complete report and the Registrar was asked.
    to arrange to interview the remaining five students and complete the
    report. He will also arrange to make a suitable notation on the
    permanent record of these students in order to offset the fact that
    they did not receive high school diplomas.
    3 B. REPORT ON SUMMER SEMESTER GRADES
    .
    The Chairman reported that by earlier action Senate had asked
    the Committee of Heads to comment on the semester grades and that
    -
    this report will be available for the next meeting of Senate.
    It was agreed that the report be received by Senate and discussion
    deferred until the comments of the Committee of Heads had been received.
    The Registrar was requested to provide comparative figures for that
    discussion.
    .
    -6-

    .
    k
    M
    /uI1d
    -6-
    3 D.
    REPORT FROM ADMISSIONS & STANDING CO1ITTEE
    The Registrar reported that preparation of this report involved
    much more study and that the Committee requested Senate to defer this
    matter in order to provide sufficient time to Work on the report.
    Senate noted that the report of the Senate Undergraduate Admissions
    Committee on Academic Standings would be received at a later date.
    3 E.
    REPORT ON FALL ENROLMENT
    The Registrar presented his report. Senate agreed to receive and
    take note of the report. It was also noted that the report did not
    include the graduate students, who number approximately two hundred.
    3 C
    • NEW PROGRAM IN SCIENCE
    Dean Rieckhoff presented his paper requesting the approval of Senate
    on the new program for a degree in "Honours Chemical Physics". He
    stated that the program would provide a sound basis for the B. Sc.
    degree with honors and would enable students to gain admission to
    graduate work in this University and to other universities in the
    appropriate areas.
    Moved by K. E. Rieckhoff, seconded by A. M. Unrau
    "that Senate approve the new program for a degree in
    'Honours Chemical Physics' "
    Dean MacKinnon pointed out the small number of electives in the
    program and stated that Princeton and Stanford noted in the docu-
    mentation as having similar programs, have a larger number of electives.
    He expressed concern that the proposed program was so narrow that it
    would produce students who would not be able to continue their studies
    at other universities. R. J. Baker stated that the program appeared
    to he a double honors program, which at UBC takes an extra year.
    There followed a discussion which clearly indicated a general
    concern about such a specialized course at the undergraduate level.
    Dean Riekhoff stated that some of the Science Faculty had expressed the
    same concern, but asked that the program be considered on its own
    merit within the framework of programs already approved at this Uni-
    versity, then the fact that this and other honors programs in the
    University made little or no provision for the humanities could be
    discussed. If it was decided that the general requirements for the
    University should be changed, then it should be done to affect other
    programs in the same manner. It was pointed out that neither Senate
    nor the faculties had discussed the curriculum since the University
    started except for the discussions at the time when it was necessary
    to make immediate decisions on the content of the calendar. Thus it
    was possible to have a series of programs similar to the one under
    discussion. Dean Rieckhoff stated that the Science Faculty had given
    the program very careful consideration from the point of view of
    broadening it, but could not work out anything that offered more breadth
    in the eight semester framework.
    .
    - 7 -

    SM
    5 /16
    et
    a-,h
    - 7 -
    F. J.
    Frederickson asked if it was vital that a decision be made
    at this time, stating that he would not like to see the proposal de-
    feated, but that there were implications which made decision difficult.
    Dean Rieckhoff replied that it was important that a decision be reached
    without delay, because there were certain students who had to be
    advised on their program in the Spring semester.
    The Chairman expressed the opinion that Senate would have to make
    a very careful examination of the question of the elimination of
    courses outside the area of specialization in order to meet standards
    for an honors program.
    The Chairman then called for a vote on the motion of
    K.
    E. Rieckhoff,
    seconded by A. M. Unrau
    "that Senate approve the new program for a degree in
    'Honours Chemical Physics' "
    CARRIED (8 to
    7)
    Moved by
    S. K.
    Lower, seconded by A. R. MacKinnon
    "that Senate direct the faculties of Arts, Science and
    Education to examine the general question of the
    liberalism of their degree programs and report back to
    Senate"
    CARRIED
    3 I. STUDENT FACULTY RIGHTS
    Senate agreed with a recommendation from the Faculty Council that
    it was not proper for the University to assign specific rights to any
    group on the campus in as much as all members of the University Com-
    munity enjoy those rights which are theirs by virtue of being citizens
    and that to single out any rights over others would be to leave doubt
    about those omitted. It was the opinion of Senate that individual and
    group rights at a University are best left assumed and that any in-
    fractions of such rights very quickly come to light.
    Moved by K. E. Rieckhoff, seconded by M. Bawtree
    "that the report of Faculty Council on Student Faculty
    Rights be accepted"
    CARRIED
    The Registrar then stated that he wished to use this paper as
    an example of papers for distribution and asked if this paper should
    be considered a Senate paper to be circulated and made available to
    Student Council. It was agreed that this would not be necessary:
    that a notation in the Registrar's summary report would be sufficient.
    1•
    - 8 -

    SP4
    b8ft/
    - 8
    W
    3 J. SENATE COMMITTEES
    The paper presented to the Senate by the Registrar pointed out
    that the Rules of Procedure adopted by Senate calls for re-election
    of Senate Committee members in October, but since these Committees
    were not established until last March, he recommended the present
    membership be carried on until October 1967.
    Moved by C. J. Frederickson, seconded by W. Vidaver
    "that the reconimer±dation of the Registrar be accepted"
    CARRIED
    4 A. NEW COURSE IN ARTS
    Dean Bottomore reported that the proposed new course, PSA 273-3,
    Archaeology of the New World, had been approved by the Arts Faculty.
    It was a companion course to 272-3, Archaeology of the Old World.
    Moved by J. F. Ellis, seconded by A. R. MacKinnon
    "that PSA 273-3, Archaeology of the New World, be approved"
    CARRIED
    4 C. CONFERMENT OF THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS ON MICHAEL J. MULKAY
    Dean Bottomore made the following report:
    The Faculty of Arts, at its meeting on Monday 26th September.
    recommended Michael J. Mulkay, B.A. (Sociology) 1st class Honours
    (London), for the M.A. degree. The details are as follows:
    Residence
    3 semesters at Simon Fraser
    Courses
    801 Sociological and Anthropological Theory
    (Systems and Models in Sociological Theory)
    891 Master's Seminar
    (The Concept of Power)
    893 Readings in Sociology
    (Two courses: Ideology and Social Change,
    Science and Society
    Thesis: Supe4n Committee
    T. B. Bottomore
    Title: "The Recruitment of Scientists:
    A Case Study in Canada"
    - 9 -

    t•
    ••.
    ism
    Final Exam. Examiniommit tee
    T. B. Bottomore
    I. Neustadt - University of Leicester
    Thesis Defence. Passed
    Moved by Dean MacKinnon seconded by D. A. Baird
    "that the Degree of Master of Arts be granted to Michael
    J. Mulkay and that the Chancellor be requested to confer
    this degree on Michael J. Mulkay, at the Spring Convoca-
    tion 1967"
    CARRIED
    4 D. SENATE'S RESPONSIBILITIES UNDER THE
    JECTION46F
    It was agreed that this item be held for discussion at the next
    meeting of Senate.
    DEFERRED
    .
    4 E. UNIVERSITY CALENDARS
    The paper distributed by the Registrar recommended the following
    schedule for both the undergraduate and graduate calendars for the
    Summer and Fall semesters of 1967 and the Spring semester of 1968:
    December 15, 1966 - All copy in hands of Registrar
    January 9, 1967
    - Calendar presented to Senate for approval
    January 13, 1967 - Copy given to printer
    February 10, 1967 - Calendars ready for distribution
    The Chairman pointed out that on January 9th both calendars would
    be presented to Senate. He stated that it was clear that the Senate
    Committee on Graduate Studies should examine the graduate calendar
    material so that it would come to Senate with the approval of this
    Committee. Since there was no like body to examine the undergraduate
    calendar material he suggested the formation of a Senate Undergraduate
    Calendar Review Committee.
    Moved by J. Lawrence Dampier, seconded by J. Mills
    "that Senate approve the schedule for the calendars
    recommended by the Registrar and that a Senate Undergraduate
    Calendar Review Committee be appointed by the Chairman"
    .
    CARRIED
    It was agreed that the Chairman would ask the three Deans for
    two nominations from each faculty to this Committee.
    - 10 -

    L
    The question of whether the study of the University Programs,
    as agreed to in 3 C., should be made prior to preparation of the
    calendars was discussed. It was agreed that this study could not
    be made in a month or two, as any solution that was pushed through
    too quickly would not be a good one. R. J. Baker felt that such
    a study could take a year to complete. It was agreed that the study
    could not be completed prior to preparation of the calendars.
    4 F. LETTER FROM CANADIAN NTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION
    Correspondence relative to a request from the Canadian Mental
    Health Association on the mental health training in the professional
    preparation of teachers was circulated to all members. It was agreed
    that Senate receive this correspondence and that discussion of the
    matter be deferred pending a report from the Faculty of Education on
    the question.
    The meeting adjourned at 5:00 PM.
    D. P. Robertson
    Secretary

    Back to top