S.07-60
• ?
OFFICE OF THE VICE—PRESIDENT, ACADEMIC AND PROVOST -
MEMO
I
ATTENTION: Senate
?
I
TEL:
I
FROM:
John Waterhouse. Chair
I ?
-
Senate Committee on Enrollment Management and Planning
RE:
Underaraduate Admission Targets for 2007/08
DATE: March 15, 2007
?
1 TIME:
Action undertaken by the Senate Committee on Enrollment Management and Planning
(SCEMP) gives rise to the following motions:
.
Motion
1:
That Senate approve and recommend to the Board of Governors the DOMESTIC
undergraduate admission targets to each Faculty, by semester and basis of admission category
as
indicated in Table 1 below, and that SCEMP be delegated authority to make adjustments based
on actual enrollment experience in Summer (1074) and Fall (1077).
Table 1:
?
2007/08 Admission Targets for Domestic Undergraduate Students
by Faculty, Basis of Admission and Semester - All Sites
I
_
1074
I
Basis Adm.
?
APSC ?
ARTS ?
BUS ?
EDUC
?
HSCI
SCI
UNIV.
BC12 ?
10 ?
63 ?
1
?
0
?
3
12
89
BCCOL
?
10 ?
457
?
18
?
0
?
5
42
532
OTHR ?
151143122
27
173
TOTAL ?
35
?
634
?
22
?
12 ?
10
81
794
I
_
1077
I
Basis Adm.
?
APSC
?
ARTS
?
BUS ?
EDUCHSCI
SCI
UNIV
BC12 ?
590
?
1,086 ?
168 ?
0
?
209
689
2,742
BCCOL
?
36 ?
608 ?
13 ?
3
?
33
76
769
OTHR ?
9047816134101
100
919
TOTAL
?
716 ?
2,172
?
197 ?
137 ?
343
865
4,430
I
_
1081
I
Basis Adm.
?
APSC
?
ARTS ?
BUS ?
EDUCHSCI
SCI
UNIV
BC12 ?
33
?
132 ?
2
?
0
?
33
18
218
BCCOL
?
10
?
416 ?
1
?
0
?
0
58
485
OTHR ?
2316035522
34
297
TOTAL ?
66 ?
708
?
6
?
55
?
55
110
1,000
I
_
Ff0708
I
Basis Adm.
?
APSCARTSBUSEDUCHSCI
SCI
UNIV
BC12
?
633
?
1,281
?
171 ?
0 ?
245
719
3,049
BCCOL ?
56
?
1,481 ?
32 ?
3 ?
38
176
1,786
OTHR ?
12875222201125
161 1,389
.
TOTAL ?
817
?
3,514 ?
225
?
204 ?
408
1,056
6,224
Motion
2:
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
?
THINKING OF THE WORLD
OFFICE OF THE VICE—PRESIDENT, ACADEMIC AND PROVOST
.
That Senate approve and recommend to the Board of Governors the INTERNATIONAL
undergraduate admission targets to each Faculty and each semester as indicated in Table 2 below,
and that SCEMP be delegated authority to make adjustments based on actual enrollment
experience in Summer (1074) and Fall (1077).
Table 2:
?
2007/08 Admission Targets for INTERNATIONAL Undergraduate Students
by Basis of Admission and Semester -
All Sites
Term
APSC
ARTS
BUS
EDUC
HSCI
SCI
UNIV
1074
23
134
30
2
0
16
205
1077
59
209
80
2
6
56
412
1081
27
134
42
1
1
17
222
FY0708
109
477
152
5
7
89
839
Notes:
Within each semester in the domestic targets, there are three groups of students for which
separate basis of admission targets are identified. These are students entering from BC secondary
schools, students transferring from BC colleges and university colleges and a number of "other"
admission categories, including university transfer students, second degree students, mature
students, secondary school graduates from other Canadian provinces, visiting, special entry,
concurrent studies, BC grade 11, BC technical schools, etc.
The target for the Faculty of Applied Sciences includes students who are newly admitted to SFU
and who enter Computing Science, Communications, Engineering Science, Kinesiology and the
TechOne program at Surrey. The Education intake quota is an estimate of the number of new
students to SFU who will be primarily admitted into the Bachelor of Education, PDP and PBD
programs. The targets for Business include students who will be admitted to the main campus as
well as into the Surrey programs. The targets for Arts and Science include students who will be
admitted to the Burnaby campus as well as Surrey programs in Explorations and Science. The
targets for Health Sciences include students admitted to the new BSc and BA programs in
Health Sciences.
2006/07 Enrollment Status:
Funded Domestic and International "B" FTE's:
SFU was funded for 16,568 undergraduate full-time equivalent (FTE) in 2006/07 and achieved
a total of 16,460 actual undergraduate FTE's, falling 108 FTE short of the target. This represents
a 99.3% undergraduate FTE utilization rate.
Unfunded International "A" FTE's:
SFU's internal target for full cost recovery International "A" students was 1,500 FTE's for
2006/07. We achieved 85.3% of this target - International "A" enrolments reached 1280
FTE's, thus resulting in a shortfall of 220 FTE's.
Program FTE Enrollment and New Student Intake Targets for 2007/08:
?
Ob
SIMONFRASERUNIVERSITY
?
THINKING OF THE WORLD
OFFICE OF THE VICE-PRESIDENT, ACADEMIC AND PROVOST
S
Funded Domestic and International "B" FTE's:
SFU's 2007/08 undergraduate domestic enrollment target from the Provincial Government is
16,879 FTE.
Meeting this program FTE target will require a new student intake of 6,224
new
students.
This is an increase of 74 new students over the 2006/07 target of 6150 (or 468 more
than the actual 2006/07 new intake of 5,756).
Unfunded International
"A"
FTh's:
In Fall 2003, SFU began to admit full-cost recovery international students into undergraduate
programs. These students are outside the provincial funding target and are required to pay
higher tuition fees. SFU's international student FTE target is 1507 FTE or 9% of domestic
students. The international target was temporarily reduced from 10% to 9% for 2007/08, with
the intention of raising the target to 10% for 2008/09. Meeting this target will require a new
student intake of
839 new international students.
For comparison, the target for 2006/07
was 815 and the actual intake was 626.
?
5 ?
Understanding the Intake Targets:
The total university enrollment is comprised of continuing student FTE's and new student
FTE's. New student intake targets each semester are determined by first allocating FTE capacity
to undergraduate students who are expected to continue from previous semesters. This can be
estimated from the previous year's retention rates and course loads by faculty, basis of admission
and student year level. The balance of the FTE's is allocated to new students and this capacity
determines the number of new students we need to admit in order to meet the overall university
enrollment plan.
The Office of Analytical Studies has developed an enrollment projection model to estimate the
optimal number of new students to admit to each faculty in order to meet the enrollment plan at
the faculty level and for the university overall (see Table 1 included with Motion 1). This year,
Student Services has developed admission models to estimate the number of new students
expected to register, based on GPA cut-offs, current application data and historical yield rates.
The results of this modeling are provided in the attached SCEMP document (see Appendix A).
For undergraduate domestic students, the admission models indicate that we will attract 1,065
fewer new registrants than we need in order to meet our domestic enrollment targets, thus
resulting in an expected shortfall of 774 total undergraduate domestic program FTE's (4.6%
below our funded FTE targets).
For undergraduate international "A" students, it is predicted that 290 fewer new international
students will register than we require to meet our international targets, resulting in a shortfall of
112 undergraduate international "A" FTE's (-7.4%).
?
• ?
It is anticipated that these shortfalls can be minimized if we improve student retention rates,
reduce course accessibility problems to enable higher student credit loads and step up our
recruiting efforts. For example, it is estimated that a 1% increase in domestic student retention
SIMONFRASERUNIVERSITY
?
THINKING O THE WORLD
OFFICE OF THE VICE—PRESIDENT, ACADEMIC AND PROVOST
rates and a 1% increase in student credit loads could increase our domestic program FTE's by
roughly 600 FTE's. The balance of the projected FTE shortfall (equivalent to approximately
400 additional new students or 145 FTE's) might be achieved through effective implementation
of a number of new recruiting and admission interventions.
If we fail to improve student retention rates or if our recruitment and admission inventions fall
short, the financial impact on the University will be severe. Based on the potential shortfall in
enrollments estimated above, the University stands to lose a minimum of $3.5 M in domestic
student tuitions, $5.6 M in provincial grant, and $1.6 M in International student tuitions, in total
$ 10.7 M.
S
SIMoN FflASER UNIVERSITY
?
THINKING OF THE WORLD
Appendix A
. ?
Simon Fraser University
Senate Committee on Enrollment Management and Planning
?
Proposed 2007/08 New Student Intake Targets
Attached is a revised set of new undergraduate student intake targets for 2007/08.
Separate targets are provided for domestic and international students. These
targets take into account the latest revisions to the undergraduate enrollment plan
and other preferences from Faculties'. The Office of Analytical Studies estimates
that achieving intake targets of 6,224 new domestic students and 839 new
international students will result in the university meeting it's 2007/08
undergraduate domestic program FTE targets (16,879 FTE domestic and 1,507 FTE
international2).
At the last SCEMP meeting on March 7, 2007, it was agreed that GPA cutoffs would
be revised (see cut-off's in Table D3) and the effect of these revised cutoffs would be
modeled by Student Services to estimate the number of expected registrants, based
on current application data and historical yield rates.
For undergraduate domestic students, the admission models indicate that we will
attract 1,065 fewer new registrants than we need in order to meet our domestic
enrollment targets, thus resulting in an expected shortfall of 774 total undergraduate
domestic program FTE's (4.6% below our funded FTE targets).
For undergraduate international "A" students, it is predicted that 290 fewer new
international students will register than we require to meet our international targets,
. resulting in a shortfall of 112 undergraduate international "A" FTE's (-7.4%).
It is anticipated that these shortfalls can be minimized if we improve student
retention rates, reduce course accessibility problems to enable higher student credit
loads and step up our recruiting efforts. For example, it is estimated that a 1%
increase in domestic student retention rates and a 1% increase in student credit
loads-could increase our domestic program FTE's by roughly 600 FTE's. The balance
of the projected FTE shortfall (equivalent to approximately 400 additional new
students or 145 FTE's) might be achieved through effective implementation of a
number of new recruiting and admission interventions (see attached).
In summary, enrollment projections and admission modeling is now complete. This
document provides the proposed new domestic student intake targets (Table Dl),
proposed new international intake targets (Table Ii) and the GPA cut-offs for
domestic and international students (Table D3). Approval of these targets and cut-
offs will be sought at SCEMP with the understanding that these intake targets are
intended to achieve the program FTE targets for each Faculty. FTE shortfalls are
anticipated in some faculties with an FTE surplus in Business. The FTE shortfalls can
be minimized with improvements in recruitment, retention and student course loads.
1
Faculty preferences for enrollment modeling:
a)
Arts and Social Sciences preferred a new intake distribution of 43% college transfer and 36% Bc12.
b)
Business preferred a target of zero college transfers in the Fall (1077) and Spring (1081), however, this
would create differential GPA cut-offs for domestic and international students and lead to a reduction in
college transfer students, offset by a smaller increase in BC12 students (because BC12's take more
• ?
credits). Therefore, to maximize the headcount intake to Business, college transfer targets remained at
?
13 for Fall and 1 for Spring, as suggested by the admission modeling and GPA cut-offs.
2
Unfunded international "A" target is 9% of the domestic funded target and excludes grandfathered
international "B" students.
3.
Heslop, Analytical Studies ?
SCEMP, March 13, 2007 ?
Page ,i
3
For reference, a brief description of some of the
recruitment and admissions
interventions under development or already implemented is provided below.
(Source: SFU Student Services).
-
stopped cancelling applications for non-payment of application fee, thereby
providing applicants a longer timeframe with which to pay their application fee
and still have their application evaluated; also, extension of the application
deadline
- evaluating and admitting BC college applicants on earlier interim grades; in the
past, for Fall college transfer applicants to be evaluated they had to have
completed their Spring college courses - now, we are evaluating and admitting
them on the basis of their in-progress Spring courses, in effect a semester's
worth or 4 months earlier
- if passed by Senate, a proposed change to the admission average calculation
for grade 12's will allow more students to be admissible, at least in the short
term. For Fall 2007 and Fall 2008, it is proposed that SFU will apply one of two
admission models that enables the student to be admitted, either using SFU's
current 5-course model or UBC's 4-course model.
- we will be evaluating BC grade 12 applicants who are deficient in a required
course but who plan to complete the required course in the Summer
- we've sent emails to thousands of applicants, providing them with a specific
"go-to" contact for any admission concerns or questions they may have
- marketing in local and ethnic newspapers
- press-release for new scholarship guarantee for 95% and up
- high school counsellor lunch being organized with our top ten feeder high
schools
- simplifying our admission requirements and harmonizing our English language
and Literacy requirements
- enrollment services teams are consulting one-on-one with faculties for a more
collaborative, university-wide approach to strategic enrollment management;
enrollment summit was held in February.
A number of
retention
initiatives are also being pursued, for example, one such
initiative would provide academic assistance to students facing academic difficulty
and allow them an extended opportunity to improve their academic performance and
continue their studies at SFU, rather than being required to withdraw.
Note: This document was revised after the SCEMP meeting on March 14
th
to reflect a minor
change in the undergraduate enrollment plan.
3. Heslop, Analytical Studies
?
SCEMP, March 13, 2007
?
Page i (#
Nr,I00m
be . Jco.-I
ZN00
NOON
ZNC'000'
)00-
ZOa'NeD
N00
U)Ir4Nmoc
U)Oa'INOCr'J
-
0
N 00
U)mo-0
- In
C)
0 - -
00
ID -. -
0
0
.1
15
15
W ?
1m11,
IJ)0000N
U).Oa'00
1I0N2
co
v
?
?
U)0000'OCfl
ilD
W2
- ?
U)0a'..CON
mo
0
D ee0e
0
or.4emN
0WQ
0000IDN
IL
09
LU
OlD
10
00
N
00
15
ge
-
co
u,NOm0
OD
0 ? -
10
UIN0ID
0 ?
co
?
ol
C)
C)NODllC)
- Ifl
0
-
.9
-
-
-
U') ?
<.N_010.I
0N100010
<InNN0l0
o10N00N
<.IInNONN
a'a'mo-o
NOU)
e
< INNO
a'amo
NInm0ID10
0InUl0N10
<N
NNI00CI
-
0
C
-J
-
-J
Q0
76 D
3•!
0.
p
.15
?
?
O0Oos
10101001U.U)
00O
1010100E-U.0
o15 ?
000I
1010100-UU)
0004s
1010100-u
a
r.
'I
e
2
?
o
o
N
0
o
e
N
45
Z In-
IN
>Na'O'O
2t-.N0)
r
.
Z
>10U)NO
Zni'r,e
-
>Q110CA
Zor-C,r,1
1010N
--d
'
T ?
2:
Z1010
m
N10.1
(7,0
co
1010
000
U)
IS
2
N
lN10
N N
-
10N0l0
ID 10
In ?
- 10 10 10
OINIOIn
a'
ID -
ID
0 N N
15
E
-
rq
15
'I)
C)
U) N
0
O C) C) ?
-
0
m
?
N
Nil)
U)
Uc.rjo
U) co U) 10 ?
-
Lia'a'.
10
U)
U)
U)
0 M
N
U)
U)
N ?
-
U)
r-
o ?
I
I
I
I
I
IS
IL
0
00 N
(N ?
00
C)
N
?
000
U)
U) ?
0
0 I') -
0
I',
10 U)
15
-
-
C) C) ?
D
U) U)
00
00 00
.X ?
0
0 -
- ?
0
0
N
N ?
0
a' 0)
10
UJ
UI
UI
UI
C
C ?
U)
- 10 Cl)
N ?
(j) 10 In
ID
N
?
(r) N - Il)
ID ?
U)
- N N
U)
?
U)
0)
a' 0
15 ?
D
-I
N
ID .0 -
a'
N m
N
N
(N
m-
V ?
C13
co
-
..I
-
NC3 00 10
V
-
?
U)InN
v ?
U)101010N
U)N10010
U)I.IN
U)0
I-
CC
10
U)
-T.-lID
-
mI-
0I0'(.1
10 0
N N
?
I-
2l 100
I-
NNU)
10 10 U)
- ?
I-
Cl)
NN
N
it
a ?
000U)U)
0010010
U)In.INW
OmomID
(flCflU)N.1OInIDIDN
0.1m
U)0)0
0.
Z ?
U),I.I.1Cl)
0.
u)a'ma'-
U)
N
?
0.
0-
'D
O
N
10
<Cl4N
H - -
E
---
•0
Ittt
C ?
<
-J I-• ?
<
-J
-
< -J
-J ?
<
-J
-J
4_<O
.! ?
UCO
1nNO<
O.INO<
ICNO<
0
0.15
?
CO ?
co
o00-
co
C3
0I
to
o00-0
.J0I
45000
0-
10o100-
45004-0
.I0I
CL
r
i0,- .
r
co
U
O
N
1.4
0
U)
2
[
I
E-
z
-I
.4
n
I-
'U
ID
I-
a
'U
Ul
0
0.
0
0. ?
.
U
V
U)
C
0.
0
U
I
N0LUC)..CCC)
N0
-4
.0
2 U )
CC
o
U)
0
-
C
LU
C' C)
0
N
00
-4
0NNC'C0'W
0
2.-CIC'0LL)O)
:
COIL)
;;
:E:
03
0N.C'C'0)
at
..LU
(.4
(.4
9
U)
N. NLI)
.
N.
If) U,
N
Li)
N
IL)
N
N
000
N
N
E
'VS.
o
o
1..
<) . O
cn
>.
LUI<
0.LU00UJ
co
-
It
0
?
C
E
?
.2
I.
U)
I-
uJ
4
I-
U
U)
I-
'U
0
U)
'U
0
0.
0
ce
0.
>
2
i)LU.-)
',
?
.-.
0 ?
>
2
2
LNLflU)
m N N
LU ?
>
LU
?
Z
-LUN
- ?
-
-
?
>
N ?
Z
NNOLS)
"
I
LU
>
-
- -
o'
0.
IL 0)00)
U)
U)
U)
U)
U)LULULU
2
2
2
2
OCLNNV
LU00
.
.-..II,r.IC'
NmNN
Oi)LLU.-'0
LI,0NN
ULUONV
0NLU.
U)
U)
lo
U)
LA
co
?
U)U,...O
tg
00 0 0
N
I.L ?
co 0
N
Lfl
LU
??
.
0
-
LU 0
to
-
-
C') co
U,
LU ?
L'J
LO
0)
o
LU
a'
0'
0)
a'
.
U)
U)
xU)
U)
U)N
-
I
I
I
•
0 ?
-.
0001LU,
CJ000LU.0
000
000NN.
0mLU
0
LULUø'O
-"'VO
0
0)0)
00LU)0'
0'
o
UJ
LU
Lii
Lu
0
- In
). ?
U)
.-L
LU
C') N
?
U)
C' C') N
0)
?
U)
-
N
?
0
C') ?
U)
N N 0
v ?
U)
C)
N
C')
N
0
.0
-
N
LUC')
C')
-
C
N
N.
C') ?
LU
LU"
C') C')
0
co
Q !
131
co
3
C
0.
>..-.
-
U)
U)Q
?
I-
C')
C C
)ON.0
co
C')
U)
0
C'N.C
co 'D
. ?
_'VL-O)Na'.0
0 ?
U)
N
U, 0)
'
D
Li)
U, .)
co
U)
0 LU
C')
CC°
LU
.V. U
C')
GoLU C')
0)
LU
0 C') I')
0'
N LU
o;<
<..
-
..n
r.Z
<LUN
U)
0. ?
?
-
0
C
?
(.1 'D Go
U,
0'
- ??
0U)NNU,"
0 U) N
- < ?
0
0
U)N
C')
CC C')
-I
U, ?
0
U)LUCI.I
C
C
)
N 0
U) ?
C.)
U)CINLU°
.-C
N
LU
'
U)
U)
LU ?
In ?
0.
0.
U,
N
<NC'4
N
a
a
WE
Z
10
In-
-
E
<
.!..!
CflNO<
-J
<
C0NO<
I0NO<
.
LIINO<
9L
O'V
L.W
In ?
?
LULULU0-
o00Q
-0I
LULULU0-
0U-O
n0I-
LULULUO.
o00Q
-UI-
LULULUQ
000
.-.0I-
-
O4
I
i
U)
'V
2
U)
LU
-
--
.00
,0
.
0
- --
000
0C
,0.0
Ln
o
N N N
N N N
N N N
N N N
z
U)
'V'V'V
3.00
)i)fl0.
'V0
0
LL)
I
U)CC
NNN
.
?
U)LflC
IC'
N
U)
1N
N
0
-
q
?
0)0)00
? ^°
0)0)50 >. ?
QISISO
0)5)00
L) ?
0
N
0
N
0 N
0
i
LU
LU
LU
LU
U) ?
U).00
Ln
00
(n
.00
LI,0
'V ?
U)
.00
0D
U)
LU
jC
co
C
0
U)00
U).00
E
U).00
Lfl.00
<N
N N
<N.
N N
to
<N
N N
<N
N N
LU
U)OO
o.eoe
.*
o,0000
. ?
U)O
o..00
0
00
-
Ln
N N N
- N N
>
N N N
NJ NJ
o
.0<
.0
0.
In
C'.
U
U
CiNQ )
C0N0
ICNLQ
CO
LULULUO
LULULUO
LU ?
LULULUO
LULULUO
N
0
0
N
.!
CC
1.
.2 ?
0
LU
N
0
.0 ?
-
CI
0 ?
CCI
CS
.
0)
U)
>-
(5
C
a
0
(5
I
.
I)
a
U)
0
a.
0
a.
>
Z
D
0
U)
N N
- ?
•
N
?
Z
— ?
0
U) -
n
0
-.
o
1n0eU)
?
m
N
N
s
??
>
'N
N ?
0
U)
U)N
N
?
Z
NDU)U)
LI)
•
-
m
0
in
..
•
?
•
?
-
- ?
0
a -
U)
• ?
U)
- N ?
U) •
• ?
U) -
?
•
?
• N
—
0
i) II) N
•.
0 ?
—
N II) -
U)
N
N
?
0 N
..
N 00 N
=
=•
I
000NN
•
UCmI
iflUl
U00
inLI)
ui
.0
U)
?
?
U)
D
0000
(n
D
N
I
?
0
'-(U)
-
N ?
U)
D
00 (()
U)
DN.-
0 CO
N
U)
co _ - ?
co
to
-
IS
-u
3 ?
U)
0 0
?
(0
U)
U)
0 N U) ?
U)
0 O ?
-(
N ?
U)
U)
0 0
IS
. ?
0
• ? - ?
• N
IC'0Lfl
- ?
-. N
I-
•
U)C
I-1000N
IN - N
Ill
cx
(5'—
•
••
'0
(N 0 (0 ?
0
U) -
U)
U) ?
00-I
0
00
U)
N
(5 VI ?
U)
ce — ?
a
E
• -
•
U)
a
m .-(
•
U) ?
U)
• ?
a
-
•
•
N ?
U)
a
in - I'
•
0
-
<
-
UI
<
V
j
j
j
j
••
a.. ?
U)U)U)O-
(500O
00O
s00O
's00O
0
-i
o
N
0
N
0
U)U)U)O-
0
0
N
0
IS
ri
-I,
U
V
2
V
2
0
0.
U)
?
to
.4
2
?
CUl
C
C
(4
U
(5
IL.
U,
^'^ '^
=
41
-
(
0.
'- <
ZC
410 ?
UI
.'4
w0000
I----
I-
I.
41
E
U ?
In0O
0 ?
I co
C
41
U
?
00O
I ?
4•1'1
.0
41
C
•
_
?
UI''
N
IT ?
LA
UI
.4
IS ?
UE
oc
C ?
<r.JInr.4.
-0
...0
0 ?
0
C UI ?
0
r,
co^z
--
t0Q0
0
41. ?
I.-
U)
It
I-
w
w
4
I-
-I
.4
0
I
Ln in
rz
m m o
0.
In
z
IV
41
41
E
O(N
C
41
or4.D
LO
(/)
0
I
0.
.;
.0
?
e_e_
U-
•0
C
UI
0
Ui
41
01 ?
Inmr-0
*1n_
CflNO'
Go
19co
co
0
4
f)mrI'a
In0LflU
2
ID 10
C
u.J0.o
-
V)
0.
r,
?
InD'Jr,0
?
-. ?
<
4141
ZC
410
- -
- -
- -
410000
o
am )
...<o
O
-
IU
41
0.
>U.INr.IO
-o-rm
0.
>NN0
ZIflIll
00
m 0
U,
1
IDIONC
00"
''
41
41
01
o.a-r.
-10
U)
In
•
0 ?
I
I
C
'4
QneJ..lca
u'n
0
0
U.
LU
.0
x
41 ?
In001'JIN
mU)
&,rem
r,m
co
-
C
C
41 ?
InC.4N
-m0lN
u,oa'as
F-"'0
4
LI
m 0' N.
0'0
-
0 1'J
—
g
?
?
<
U)r1ItCJO
0.
-.
U)OIN
C ?
- - -
co
-
,
41 ?
410000
I.--.--
LO
U,
2
.0
0.
/0.
.
I
?
I ?
I
I
?
?
I ?
bIE
I
10,
I
1nr7
4&
I
I
?
I ?
I ?
I
p..
I ?
I ?
I
-
I
?
I
N}
I
?
I
?
I
?
I
I ?
I
?
I
?
I
I
?
I
?
I ?
I
-
u
(fl
•
I ?
I
?
I
?
I
I
?
I
?
I ?
I
I
I;>
I ?
I ?
I
?
I
I ?
I
-
- - -
15
I ?
I ?
I
I ?
I
?
I
Ce
n
D
00
I
to
0,-
ID
i
o
00.
I
- -
--- -
?
-
0 ?
0
?
0
?
0
?
0
?
0
o
?
0 ?
0
?
0
?
0
?
0
ID
?
Lu ?
(1 ?
(N ?
—
—
— 0
—
UflO3p2aH
z w
2
tj
ZU)
0
IA
(AE
I ?
I ?
I ?
I
I ?
I ?
I
-
WI;
I-
-
I
?
I
in
E >
i ?
I ?
I
t ?
I
rJ uL
0
go LU
I
?
I
?
I
I ?
I ?
I ?
I
I
?
I
I
?
I
?
I
?
I
U
I ?
I
?
I LU
-
?
-
CC
I
?
I
?
I
- - -
o
lAO
ID
I
I.
_________
I ?
I ?
I
co
0
10 0
.-
IDVI
(0
I ?
I
p .
I
IL
I
?
I
?
I
e
0
N ?
0
0
ID ?
0
0
II ?
0
0
t
?
0
0
(fl ?
0
0
('I ?
0
0
-
0
t
0
C
Ui
oL
5 .3.14 WEJ5Od
zotVI
cm
—I
4
I
4
U
—
0
I
.
I ?
I
I
?
I
?
I
?
I
Rn
dJ
I ?
I ?
I
?
I
?
I
?
I
I
?
I
?
I
?
I ?
I
-
- I ?
I ?
I ?
I
?
I ?
I ?
I
C I ?
I ?
I ?
I ?
I ?
I
- II ??
II
?
?
I ?
I
I
?
I
IA
I
?
I
?
I ?
I
I -
I
?
t
?
I
-x
I ?
I ?
I ?
I -
E
C
I ?
I
?
I ?
I
I
0rN
o a
I ?
I ?
I ?
I ?
iU
r- -
I
?
I
tflo
-
Ow
z .-.
I ?
I ?
I ?
I ?
I
02
I
N
00.
I
?
I
?
I
Vu N
o
o
i
(N
N
I ?
I ?
1.1
0
I
———I--
-
--
o
0
00000000
?
o
VI ?
0
0 ?
0
Lfl ?
0
0 ?
0
Lfl ?
0
0
?
0
V(
0
0
o
— ?
0)
wnopeau
Z
w
2
IA '
Ui
IIA
0
(00S
EW
10••
ch
LU
I ?
I ?
I ?
I ?
I
I ?
I ?
I
- - - - -
I ?
I ?
I
WE
E'
co
I ?
I
?
I ?
I
n
I ?
I ?
I ?
I ?
I
__
000000000
00000000
00000000
01/)
S
.314 WCJAOJd
ZU1/)
00
• .
0
'I)
1/-
(0
C
0.
0
0
I
1/.
