1. MEMORANDUM

SiMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
S. '+3 \
-0
MEMORANDUM
.
To................................................................................................................
From ...
............. GREG
BAS HAM
STUDENT SENATOR
Subject..
INDEPENDENTTUP''....PROPOSALS
Date...... ...... ...OCTOBER 22
.7•O
Independent Study Proposals
Motion 1. "That Senate approve, in principle, the offering
of a 400 level course of independent semester
study by the departments of the Faculty of Arts
and the Faculty of Science and that credit be
granted as follows:
Majors Program 15 hours
Honours Program 18 hours
The implementation of such proposals be subject
to ratification by Senate in the normal manner
and that only one such course be permitted for
credit towards the degree."
Motion 2. "That Senate approve, in principle, departments
in the Faculty of Arts and the Faculty of Science
offering of a 300 level course of independent
study and that credit granted be ten hours. A
minimum of 45 hours is required for entry to the
course.
The implementation of such proposals be subject
to ratification by Senate in the normal manner
and that only one such course be permitted for
credit towards the degree."
GB/dp
0

The purpose of these proposals is to provide undergrad-
uate students with a means to formulate, research and ascer-
tain solutions to problems of their own selection by intensive
study. The present course structure entails both incremental
learning and some forms of independent study and directed
research.
The proposals are to extend and further evolve the present
undergraduate program as offered. Their classification is not,
however, entirely innovative, experimental and/or interdiscip-
linary. The existence of similarly structured courses pre-
cludes these classifications. For example:
.
B.S.F. 498-18 (Honours)
B.S.F. 499-15
C.C.A. 499-15
History 499-18 (Honours Program only)
There are several other proposals concerning interdiscip-
linary studies, experimental programs, and innovative educa-
tional techniques including a general studies degree, currently
being discussed at various stages. These are complementary.
and, hopefully, soon to be instituted.
The implementation of these does not necessarily strengthen
or enhance the present linear and organized programs in a way
which allows for the most adequate demonstration of learned
skills and abilities. In other words, it is time to create
an institutional framework in which a student has the greatest
opportunity to apply the knowledge gained from the core pro-
grams.
The semester operation is designed to maximize course
selection in line with student preferences and needs. The
semester system further enables a portion, or the full semester,
to be devoted to independent study and research to complement
the concept of a wide selection of course. The two are not
necessarily mutually exclusive as future departmental recom-
mendations will take this into account. This is mentioned
again later.

4
0
- 2 -
The inclusion of a 300 level course (10 hours) is based
on several academic arguments. It initially presents itself
as an intermediate level of independent study while permitting
work to continue towards fulfilling majors, honours or group
requirements. It has the further feature of an option to the
400 level course.
The maximum amount of independent study will remain as
initially stated: One 300 level course and one 400 level
course in a different department or subject area. This would
be determined by the departments.
An alternative to this could be a maximum of two 300
level courses in different areas or departments. Once again,
it is a consideration the department and Senate can give at a
later date.
Further implications involve changes in upper and lower
level hour requirements in the department. In cases where
departments require 30 semester hours at the 300 and 400
level in the department, it will be necessary to determine the
amount of independent study credit which may be applied towards
.
that requirement.
Also to be considered is the basic philosophy of a wide
selection of courses. These are best developed by normal
departmental reviews of the curricula.
These proposals serve as guidelines with which departments
may work to facilitate program changes as well as to provide
stimulation and leadership by Senate in improving the academic
program. Thus, approval will enable the greater development
and extension of a good undergraduate education.
GB/dp
0

Back to top