,
    SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
    Paper S-82
    •To ................ Senate
    .....
    ... . ....... ....... ... ............................... ..... ..... ... .....From.....D.
    G.
    Tuck,...........................................................
    Acting Dean of Scienc...................................
    Subled....
    Administrative ... Loa.d on Faculty
    Date....
    October. 31,.1967
    .......................
    .............
    Members.
    Every member of the faculty must be aware that while
    considerable lip service is paid to the importance of teaching and
    scholarship, the time of faculty members, and especially senior
    members of the faculty, is completely misused. These people,
    appointed by yirtue of their ability in teaching and research are
    spending a large proportion of their time as administrators. It may
    well be that this is due in part to the difficulty of getting administrative
    positions established in the budget. I suggest, however, that we ought
    to be setting our sights above this, since the scholastic reputation of
    the University will depend on the impact it makes on the general
    university world by good teaching and good research. It follows that the
    heavy load of administration on faculty members merely delays the
    time in which academic excellence is likely to be achieved in this
    University.
    While most people came here expecting to be involved in son-ic
    administration, the signs are that the administrative load upon faculty
    members is constantly increasing, so that faculty find less and less
    time for teaching and research. There are a number of actions which
    could remedy this, and which will no doubt be the subject of future
    discussions, but the one which I- wish to bring to the attention of this
    Committee is concerned with the situation in the summer semester.
    Many faculty members take their research semester during the summer,
    and many, particularly in the. Science Faculty, stay on campus in order
    to make use of the facilities here. Unfortunately, much of the administrative
    machinery of the University continues to grind on during the summer
    semester and a member of faculty who sits on a committee for example
    is then faced with a dilemma: he can either give up his work on the
    committee (which reduces its efficiency), or he can continue to attend
    in the hope that the committee will achieve what it set out to do. A
    faculty member who adopts the latter point of viewmay (and does) find
    a considerable fraction of his research time cut out. Members of the
    University are growing increasingly resentful of a situation in which
    the summer semester is merely a period in which one does not teach,
    rather than as at other universities, a period in which research can be
    .
    carried out in a relatively uninterrupted manner. From a poll of faculty
    members in Science, I know that this resentment is widespread.. Here
    is a situation in which the real purpose of the University is being seriously
    -
    .
    .

    5i
    41
    7
    -2-
    .
    hindered by administrative duties. I would like to suggest that we could
    overcome this particular evil to a large extent by cutting out as much as
    possible of the committee work during the months of June, July and August.
    I think Senate could set a startling example to the rest of the University
    by declaring now that it will hold no meetings during those months, except
    on an emergency basis. No doubt people will protest that important
    business must be carried out in those months, but I believe that with a
    little foresight we can prevent such business arising. From discussions
    with colleagues, I can see little which cannot be put off until the
    • September meeting of Senate. Furthermore, if Senate itself refuses
    to meet in June, July and August, the many committeeswhich depend upon
    Senate and which report to it directly or indirectly,will also cease to
    function automatically. Faculty meetings would also be needed only in
    emergencies. This would, I believe, do much to restore to members
    of the faculty that time for research which is their right and responsibility.
    I hope that these matters can be discussed in Senate at
    its
    next
    meeting.
    D. G. Tuck
    Pt

    Back to top