,
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
Paper S-82
•To ................ Senate
.....
... . ....... ....... ... ............................... ..... ..... ... .....From.....D.
G.
Tuck,...........................................................
Acting Dean of Scienc...................................
Subled....
Administrative ... Loa.d on Faculty
Date....
October. 31,.1967
.......................
.............
Members.
Every member of the faculty must be aware that while
considerable lip service is paid to the importance of teaching and
scholarship, the time of faculty members, and especially senior
members of the faculty, is completely misused. These people,
appointed by yirtue of their ability in teaching and research are
spending a large proportion of their time as administrators. It may
well be that this is due in part to the difficulty of getting administrative
positions established in the budget. I suggest, however, that we ought
to be setting our sights above this, since the scholastic reputation of
the University will depend on the impact it makes on the general
university world by good teaching and good research. It follows that the
heavy load of administration on faculty members merely delays the
time in which academic excellence is likely to be achieved in this
University.
While most people came here expecting to be involved in son-ic
administration, the signs are that the administrative load upon faculty
members is constantly increasing, so that faculty find less and less
time for teaching and research. There are a number of actions which
could remedy this, and which will no doubt be the subject of future
discussions, but the one which I- wish to bring to the attention of this
Committee is concerned with the situation in the summer semester.
Many faculty members take their research semester during the summer,
and many, particularly in the. Science Faculty, stay on campus in order
to make use of the facilities here. Unfortunately, much of the administrative
machinery of the University continues to grind on during the summer
semester and a member of faculty who sits on a committee for example
is then faced with a dilemma: he can either give up his work on the
committee (which reduces its efficiency), or he can continue to attend
in the hope that the committee will achieve what it set out to do. A
faculty member who adopts the latter point of viewmay (and does) find
a considerable fraction of his research time cut out. Members of the
University are growing increasingly resentful of a situation in which
the summer semester is merely a period in which one does not teach,
rather than as at other universities, a period in which research can be
.
carried out in a relatively uninterrupted manner. From a poll of faculty
members in Science, I know that this resentment is widespread.. Here
is a situation in which the real purpose of the University is being seriously
-
.
.
5i
41
7
-2-
.
hindered by administrative duties. I would like to suggest that we could
overcome this particular evil to a large extent by cutting out as much as
possible of the committee work during the months of June, July and August.
I think Senate could set a startling example to the rest of the University
by declaring now that it will hold no meetings during those months, except
on an emergency basis. No doubt people will protest that important
business must be carried out in those months, but I believe that with a
•
little foresight we can prevent such business arising. From discussions
with colleagues, I can see little which cannot be put off until the
•
• September meeting of Senate. Furthermore, if Senate itself refuses
to meet in June, July and August, the many committeeswhich depend upon
Senate and which report to it directly or indirectly,will also cease to
function automatically. Faculty meetings would also be needed only in
emergencies. This would, I believe, do much to restore to members
of the faculty that time for research which is their right and responsibility.
I hope that these matters can be discussed in Senate at
its
next
meeting.
D. G. Tuck
Pt