S I V3 05 6
    A PROPOSAL FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE
    SENATE UNDERGRADUATE ADMISSIONS BOARD
    and the
    SENATE APPEALS BOARD
    The general philosophy proposed is to regard the Registrar's
    Office as the "executive branch"; the Admissions Board as the
    "legislative branch"; and the Appeals Board as the "judicial
    branch". These terms are to be regarded as descriptive and
    should not necessarily be interpreted in a strict conventional
    sense.
    THE REGISTRAR'S OFFICE
    In performing the executive function, this office is charged
    with the administration and application of those directives
    .
    emanating from the Admissions Board. If a need is felt for inter-
    pretation or if a case arises that has aspects not covered by
    policy, the Registrar is charged with the duty to seek the advice
    of the Admissions Board. The Registrar is to act in a similar
    manner if he finds that some directives appear to be in conflict
    with each other, or if he encounters a case not covered by
    Admissions Board directives or if he feels any directive is in
    violation of the spirit of Senate policy (particularly the Ellis
    Report, as amended).
    THE SENATE UNDERGRADUATE ADMISSIONS BOARD (SUAB)
    Purpose:
    To receive the Senate's policy decisions on under-
    graduate admissions, re-admissions, standing, and
    credit transfer policy and, where necessary, to
    elaborate, provide direction on applicability and
    provide specific interpretation of such policy.
    The spirit of Senate's policies and, particularly,
    the spirit of the Ellis Report (as amended) are to
    be adhered to at all times.
    When necessary, to make recommendations to Senate
    for change and revision of policy concerning
    .
    undergraduate admissions, re-admission, standing,
    and credit transfer.

    .
    -2-
    Procedure:
    The SUAB will consider individual cases (involving
    aspects not previously considered) at the request
    of the Registrar's Office. These decisions on
    individual cases may subsequently be generalized
    and serve as a basis for future cases. Decisions
    by the SUAD shall be final.
    All decisions by the SUAB that elaborate, provide
    direction on applicability and provide specific
    interpretation of Senate policies, shall be forward-
    ed to the SAB.
    Membership: The Academic Vice-President or his designate as
    Chairman (voting).
    One faculty member elected by each Faculty from
    its Undergraduate Curriculum Committee for two-
    year terms.
    One student from each of the Faculties, selected
    by a method to be determined by Student Council,
    for one-year terms.
    Dean of Student Affairs.
    Director of Admissions.
    Registrar.
    Recording Secretary (non-voting).
    Operation:
    A quorum shall be five voting members.
    Decisions will be based on majority (of those
    present) rule.
    The Director of Admissions will be responsible for
    preparing the Agenda of the Meetings, sending out
    notices of meeting, preparing and distributing
    minutes of each meeting to the members of the SUAB
    and SAB.
    Meetings shall be closed and proceedings shall
    remain confidential. Policy statements shall be
    publicized through. normal channels.
    0

    -3-
    0
    THE SENATE APPEALS BOARD (SAB)
    Purpose:
    To consider each case of Appeal that is initiated
    by any individuaL.ho. feels aggrieved by the
    decision of the Registrar's office concerning
    admission, re-admission, standing, credit transfer
    or grade changes. The appellant has the option of
    a personal appearance before the Board, if so
    desired.
    Procedure:
    The SAB is charged with the responsibility of
    applying Senate policy as directed by SUAB. This
    body cannot make policy. It is thus obvious that
    Senate policy and SUAB directives need to include
    flexibility -- clauses such as "in normal circum-
    stances"; "in most cases"; and "usually"; etc.
    The SAB then must seek out and consider information
    about each individual case it hears that the
    Registrar's Office may not have had access to. It
    must then decide whether this additional information
    is sufficient to rule an individual case to be
    "unusual" or "special" and apply the implicit
    flexibility of Senate policy and SUAB directives.
    Membership: Registrar or his designate as non-voting chairman.
    Two faculty members, plus one alternate (who votes
    only in the absence of one of the regular faculty
    members) elected by Senate for two-year terms.
    Two students, plus one alternate (who votes only in
    the absence of one of the regular student members)
    determined by Student Council for one-year terms.
    Recording secretary (non-voting).
    Operation:
    A quorum shall be two faculty members and two students.
    The Appeals Board must decide each case presented to
    it as speedily as possible.
    Meeting shall be closed and proceedings shall remain
    confidential.
    Meetings will occur three times a semester; in the
    week before registration; after regular registration,

    -4-
    but before the final date to change courses and,
    third, around the ninth week of the semester.
    (A heavy number of cases could result in "one
    meeting" being spread over two or even three days).
    The schedule of meetings will be announced well in
    advance.
    The Office of the Registrar will be responsible
    for preparing the cases and notifying the
    appellants of their option to make a personal
    appearance (or have someone make an appearance on
    their behalf), recording and distributing the
    minutes to the members of SUAB and SAB and notifying
    the appellant of the SAB's decision.
    JOINT MEETINGS
    If either the SUAB or the SAB feels the need for a joint meeting
    to discuss new policies, or the clarification or revision of
    existing policies, then either group shall have the right to call
    .
    such a joint meeting. This does not abrogate or supercede the
    rights or responsibilities of the individual committees as detailed
    above.
    John E. Sayre,
    Senate Committee on the Implementation
    of the Ellis Report.
    DM:JES :bc
    0

    Back to top