SENATE 

?

B .G.11SON .AqAD 

?

. PRESIDENT 

AND CHAIRMAN, SENATE UNDERGRADUATE 

ADMISSIONS BOARD 

............. RELEASEOFGRADES .S.. 71738......................... 

Date ... .. ..... FEBRUARY 

9

19.7.1 

MOTION: 

"That Senate approve that Paragraph 10 of Senate 

Paper 

(7th March, 1966) be replaced by the 

following: 'Provisional course grades may be 

released by instructors at the end of semester. 

Students must be told orally or by personal 

communication -- Lists should not be posted."' 

.

NOTE: Paragraph 10 of Senate Paper 

as revised and approved by 

Senate at its meeting of March 7, 1966 reads as follows: 

"Course grades at the end of a semester are not to be 

released until approved by the Committee on Admissions and 

Standings. 

ir

TO: SENATE ? 

FROM: DR. B.C. WILSON 

ACADEMIC VICE-PRESIDENT 

AND CHAIRMAN, SENATE 

UNDERGRADUATE ADMISSIONS 

BOARD 

SUBJECT: RELEASE OF GRADES ? 

DATE: 9th FEBRUARY, 1971 

This is to advise that the Senate Undergraduate Admissions 

Board approved Paper SUAB 13 at their meeting on February 

4th, 1971, and it is now being forwarded to Senate for 

approval. 

.

End. 

SUAB 13 

TO: MEMBERS, SENATE UNDERGRADUATE 

?

FROM: GD. BASHAN 

ADMISSIONS BOARD 

?

K.W. GILBERT 

DATE: 29th JANUARY, 1971 

SUBJECT: RELEASE OF GRADES 

Moved 

"That S.U.A.B. recommends to Senate that Paragraph 10? 

of Senate Paper 3i (7th March, 1966) be replaced by 

the

following: 'Provisional course grades may be 

released by instructors at the end of semester. 

Students must be told orally or by personal communi- 

cation -- lists should not be posted'." 

.

?

The present regulation is ignored by many faculty and is 

unknown to many others. It appears that the posting of 

grades by number and the verbal release of grades are standard 

practices. 

One of the problems with the rule, as it exists, is that by 

the time the transcripts are released, the teaching assistant 

and/or faculty member may be beginning an off-semester and 

unavailable for queries or appeals. 

In effect, the elimination of this rule would serve merely to 

legitimize present practices. Further, the overview of trans- 

cripts by the S.U.A.B. is not affected by this course of action. 

The S.U.A.B. reviews only transcripts of students on probation, 

RTW and P.W. 