1. Page 1
    2. Page 2
    3. Page 3
    4. Page 4
    5. Page 5
    6. Page 6
    7. Page 7
    8. Page 8
    9. Page 9
    10. Page 10

 
SiMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
S7/-Z9
Sf
MA
lflW
&
f
e
lf
D
lU
A
V
Ifl
W
h
VC
IU
... .... ..... ...
.Q.f See nate. .................. . ...........................
.From .....
Q. . W.iso
Chairman....Sente .gendaCommittee
Subject......................................................................................
Date..
January
18....19.7.1
....................
The Senate Agenda Committee asked me to bring to your attention
a possible conflict between two papers to be discussed at Senate on
the 18th of January, 1971. Paper S.71-4 - Definition of Minor Program -
sets out University requirements for a designation of "Minor" on a
student's transcript. The recommendation is that Senate define a
Minor Program to include 14-18 upper division credit hours in the
subject area. On the other hand Paper S.71-14 under the heading:
Report of the Faculty of Arts, uses a somewhat more restrictive designation
for a Minor Program. Consequently the approval of Paper S.71-4 prior
to consideration of Paper S.71-14 would imply changes in the latter paper..
The Senate Agenda Committee also wished to point to certain
divergence of nomenclature in the description of courses and
programs presented at different times to Senate. The Agenda Committee
suggests that Senate'approve the word level to refer to the status
of an individual student's program For example the first four
undergraduate levels (i.e. the first 60 semester. hours of credit) would
be referred to as the lower levels.
The levels beyond level four
would be referred to as the upper levels.
)(
The word division would
then be restricted to the description of undergraduate courses. Under-
graduate courses numbered in the 100 and 200 series would be referred to as
lower division courses; those numbered 300 and above would be referred
to as upper division courses."
The restriction of the word level to the stage in a student's
program and relating division to the course numbering would, In the
opinion of the Committee, eliminate ambiguities in the wording of
papers and regulations appearing in the University Calendar.
B. G. Wilson
ams
'A
, I

Back to top