1. Page 1
    2. Page 2
    3. Page 3
    4. Page 4

 
I
?
SiMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
?
yr,-' 1LaQ
MEMORANDUM
-00 ?
SENATE ?
From
_SENATE COMMITTEE ON UNDERGRADUATE STUDIES
Subject
?
USE OF VECTOR DESCRIPTIONS IN THE
?
Date
November 14, 1974
CALENDAR
MOTION
I:
?
That Senate approve an amendment to its previous
regulation on the use of vector descriptions in the
calendar to permit those Faculties or Departments
who so wish to have a numerical vector description
listed in the calendar against their courses."
EXPLANATORY NOTE:
40 ?
['The intent is to amend attached Issue 7, use of
vector patterns (in regularly scheduled courses)
such that where the Faculty or Department wishes,
the numerical vector description applicable under
Issue 7(d) would appear in the calendar (as well
as in the Course Guide) in lieu of the word
identification called for under Issue 7(b)
If approved,this change would be effective
immediately in preparation for the 1975/76 calendar]
L

 
•1'
7.
Uav of Vector_P
flouIar]vchduidcourco)
-
the intcnt
of
this
&t
ion eas that vector patterns lie ci il,lintcLI
/ ?
fro:
the ltiiversi tv C:flcnd:r Only lTl'1
licit
that, in the prcscntatin
of
11cr:
course pvop(n1s, no indication of the vector pattern :tsined
to
each course shoulti be riven. A Section for this infonmition exists
on
the no;, course prc.po;aI
foim;
and it
is
not intended that this
Sect ton :1;utiid bc clir:inatcd.
?
Ii,ia, in pro;osin a nc:i course,
dcparteein
s
:i] I indicate what they anticipate will he the norm-al
• ?
Vector j):tt tern for ic course; and this ciii he cukni tted for ac'roval
tlireu1:i 11:0 faculty ctirricttlira cc'o;,ittce,CUS
and
Senate.
ilie folior.ing should 'lso
be
ntt:
a)
SOT. c,r:::s,
sirth as (:rccted r;Pns, will not have vectors
b) 11w' ?
office
istrnc's
ciii :v:ititai; a 'it(- of the vector originally
approved. Dcp:n'tuc'ntol offices sh:id 10 likewise.
c)
This
vector can he chan:ed for ruy ,ivcn semester, or semesters,
by
the Chairron of the l
) eic;rtin
.1'.t, si!.icct to the approval of the
DparUnrns:iI CtltTicu1ts Ct'aoitte., and u.ithin the total nun:cr
of
contact hours
ass
ined to the course. If chanc is to be rnad for
any mother
of
Consc'cutive semesters, consideration should be given
to a rcq::e:t for fonsal cçproval to clianc the original vector to
that now desired.
d)
For each scir.cstcr the pertinent vector will appear in the Course
Guide, idontifying
identifying the method for that scu:ester. The ch:nnes and
ztppror: I under el rust reach the flc,i:t r:tr' s Office, ScI:eduli::
Section,
along with
all other schedulin
g
material each sewester.
I.uo
7.
MOTION: ?
"That Senate approve • as vat forth
in S.74-43,
rep
a)
That all vector patterns be olimlitateil from the University
Calendar.
b)
That each course description contained in the University
Calendar be .lecc'spanit:d by an mdi car ion of the nature of
the couruc, c .g. lcctutn/tutorial , le tuIre./LLIrorial/lahorLtory.
scadnar, ctr.
c)
Tint, within the total rnr.,ber of coliLact liotir:; aiiid to a
con rue • .ini oubject to tit,' :Ipprl.v:l I Of the. d;
.
pnrtr.i':itaI under-
• •-•
? flr:l(lli:It ., eli r en I ma eroi it ec • time
ChA
rr.ian lie l
i
e tr.i it Lc(I to
.
?
.
Vary tme vm-ti '
r patLeri l . ?
:cIm v,cl mr l
m ::ttimmr to reflect
?
0111)'
tIc'
t. i.ius riqul r,IJ'IL;
:iui,I
Liii'
e:,Ic;til.it description of
the coui ui ?
-..
?
-
• d) That vector patterns for all regularly scheduled courses be
Included in the Course Celde; I)c.partecntal approval will be
In
writing and ubu11.1-Led to the Registrar."
Rstion.,le
There is considerable confusion shout vector patterns. This is
attributable to the many uses to which they mire currently put. For eeoc
course. • veciot neobera indicate the lecture, tutorial, laboratory pat tern,
while others use the first vector nuciber to iiuli late the amount of outside
work requi re.d. Seminars present rectal protilcos with Coin(: departments
indicating vc'e.tnr paLLcrn of 0-5-0 and others the vector
2-3-0.
There is
agreccnt, lua::cvcr, that currant vector patterns:
,) often do not beat any relationship to either the contact hours
of the course or the credit hours assifned to it.
b)
need not reflect the way in which the course is actually taught.
c)
will vary from sOmostor to rcmestcr for individual courses
dependent upon the jiistructor.
d)
servo no useful purpose in the University's Calendar.
C)
would be of assistance to students if placed in the Course
-
?
CuidonvtcIcd they carried a co:ejstcnt ricantnf.
-
?
?
Becaue teacKrin r.:cthod ,inml content often influence students' chalco
Of courses, ft is reasonable to cpuct that occitrute information on both will
be
supplied to students in advance of time coure. We recognise that indjvidul
faculty i:ewhors clii vary in their approaCh to tic seme course and that the
annual publication of tIic Universtiy 's C"IL-ntlzt r
c;unnt therefore reflect there
sc.westcr chioii;;ee. Furihirnore • time iluiLve: sy :; Calendar is a statci:a.at of
general policies '
and principleS tad we flail 11:11e justification for L;e con-
tinued incite; [cii In
it
or vector patirlus. Perause the Calendar Is u;eui to
dctormlno t ,-a;uii cr cru'dI t for et u,?:;: 1:; onrolling at other tmuil uct:: It! ::; ::ho linen
taken cr'.irue:; CL liii:; tIm I vorsi ty iid i
..
'c:iiism: it.
it
a general futile
(0 1'
r.telr:it
taking couruts at Siunmim Ii'asm-r, e' iciee ru'cor.s:
hued
that carl: cCitmrl:
?
•1ecr!p
contained Iii ti' CnIc-ndnr be nectI:p;si led by
it
t.
h%
CiaI dtecmi m
tion of the 5ni:ti
In
which 11w
uLi:i
rue will -ho Liu111 ,
?
Since the Cu'ut' Cimiute 1mi0vlmk::
?
iferiathiii
on
ftidlvldua nirce;ter
COIIL'SC
offerltirs, we Iil
LuVU
LIlOC it is timc list anIro-
prlatc place in which tm' incorporate course VrCtOI p;mttemnu.

 
A
?
5.7L( 1620-
1
?
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
MEMORANDUM
At its meeting of 12th November, the Senate Committee
on Undergraduate Studies considered the attached proposal from the
Faculty of Science that the existing Senate regulation on the use of
vector descriptions in the Calendar be amended to permit those Faculties
or Departments which wish to do so to include course vector descriptions
in the Calendar.
For the information of Senate, a copy of the present
regulation, passed earlier this year as part of Senate Paper S.74-.43,
and of an explanatory note to Departments from the Chairman of SCUS
is attached to this proposal.
?
The Chairman of the Faculty of Science
Curriculum Committee emphasized that, in approving this recommendation,
the Faculty of Science had not intended to ask for repeal of the
existing regulation but merely to make provision for those departments
wishing to do so to include vector descriptions in the Calendar. He
noted that, in the departments In the Faculty of Science, vector
.
descriptions seldom if ever varied and that the elimination of course
vector descriptions from the Calendar deprived these departments of
a valuable means of comparison with other universities. Thus, it
was the wish of these departments that they be allowed to include
such descriptions in the Calendar in future.
This proposal Is now forwarded to Senate, with the
Committee's recommendation that it be approved.
H—cs.
I. Mugrige
ams
att.

 
SiMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
?
MEMORANDUM
I,....................
$,.nate
Committee on ?
.
From..., ?
A.E. Curzon
...... .... ....... ..... .U.n4
?
g
a4.uate....Studies
Act .
ng Dean of Science
Subject
..............
U.S ....OF VC.T.OR PE
SCRIPTIONS
?
.
Date.....
.......
...
.
Novemb.c.r
7,,
, 1974
IN THE -CALENDAR
The Faculty of Science, at its meeting of October 31, 1974,
passed a motion,
"To request Senate to amend its previous regulation so as to permit
those Faculties and/or Departments that wish, to have a numerical
vector description listed in the calendar against their courses."
Rationale:
Vector descriptions are commonly used in universities, particularly
in the local universities, as a valuable means of comparing
courses, especially with respect to the amount and nature of
the material presented in a course, and its division between
.
?
lectures, tutorials, and laboratories. Consequently, the
dropping of the vector notation in the calendar is liable
to lead to misunderstanding and difficulties in other institutions
incomparing our courses with theirs, and could have the effect
of diminishing the credibility of our programs.
1w
104L

Back to top