1. Page 1
    2. Page 2
    3. Page 3
    4. Page 4
    5. Page 5
    6. Page 6
    7. Page 7
    8. Page 8
    9. Page 9
    10. Page 10
    11. Page 11
    12. Page 12
    13. Page 13
    14. Page 14
    15. Page 15
    16. Page 16
    17. Page 17
    18. Page 18
    19. Page 19
    20. Page 20
    21. Page 21
    22. Page 22
    23. Page 23
    24. Page 24
    25. Page 25
    26. Page 26
    27. Page 27
    28. Page 28
    29. Page 29
    30. Page 30
    31. Page 31
    32. Page 32
    33. Page 33
    34. Page 34
    35. Page 35
    36. Page 36
    37. Page 37
    38. Page 38
    39. Page 39
    40. Page 40
    41. Page 41
    42. Page 42
    43. Page 43

 
SiMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
?
5.74;??
?
.
?
MEMORANDUM
?
I
?
SENATE
?
From ?
SENATE LIBRARY (flMMTTTFF.
Subject
?
?
Date
?
MAY 16, 1974
SENATE FOR THE PERIOD MAY 1973 -
.
S

 
874-77
.
SENATE LIBRARY COMMITTEE
REPORT ?
TO SENATE
FOR THE PERIOD
MAY 1973 - MAY 1974
0

 
I. ?
TERMS OF REFERENCE
0
?
SENATE LIBEA*.? CONIIITTEE
TYPE ?
Standing
PURPOSE The Senate Library Committee will advise the
University Librarian in:
1.
formulating policy in regard to the development of library re-
sources for instruction and research
2.
allocating funds to the fields of instruction and research
3.
determining policies governing the loan of library resources
and the other service aspects of the library system
4.
drawing up rules and regulations governing conduct in the
library building
The Committee will be charged with keeping the
University Librarian informed concerning the
Library needs and expectations of instructional
and research staffs
?
The Library Representatives of individual depart-
ments are concerned with forwarding to the
. ?
Library the specific book and periodical require-
ments of their departments
MEMBER- President
SHIP
University Librarian
Three members of Senate, one of whom should be a student
Three faculty members, one from each faculty
Assistant University Librarians, who will be joint secretaries
to the Committee and will be without vote
TERMS OF APPOINTMENT
The three Senate representatives will be appointed
biennially and the three Faculty representatives
biennially
FREQUENCY OF MEETINGS
The Senate Library Committee will meet once a
semester. Special meetings will be at the call
of the Chairman
The Committee will present an annual report to
the Senate
Approved by Senate - March 7, 1966
Revised and approved by Senate - January 10, 1972
May 14, 1974
(June 12/69 & Jan. 14/69)
. . . 2

 
-z -
S
II. ?
MEMBERS
?
MAY 1973 - MAY 1974
President ?
Ex-officio Senate
?
I. Mugridge
(designate)
University Librarian
?
Ex-officio Senate
?
D. A. Baird
Senator
?
Elected ?
A. L. Hollibaugh
Senator
? by
?
J. M. Kitchen
5
Senator
Senate
Faculty ?
(Arts)
Elected
Faculty ?
(Education)
by
Faculty ?
(Science)
Faculties
Assistant
?
University
Ex-officio
Librarians
(non-voting)
Ex
-officio
S
Ex -officio
K.
K. Nair
P. Stigger Chairman
G. R. Eastwood
L.
D. Druehi
T. C. Dobb
C. W. MacDonald
L. E. Thomas
...3

 
-3 -
III, ACTIVITIES
?
MAY 1972 - MAY 1973
The Senate Library Committee met three times during this period:
May 2, 1973; January 30 and February 13, 1974. Discussion and
re-
commendations as related to the charge of the Committee are outlined
below.
1.
Formulating policy in regard to the development
of Library resources for instruction and research
Draft Collection Policies and Procedures
Collection development requires several years of continuous
assessment before a cohesive
.
corpus of literary resources appears
to support the instructional and research programmes of a new
university. Interim guidelines which have been developed have
now been brought together in the draft document attached and
further discussion and refinement will take place with the committee
at the next several meetings (see Appendix I).
2.
Allocating funds to the fields of instruction and
research
New Allocation Formula
A chronology of library allocations appeared in the report
to Senate from the Senate Library Committee last year. The
rationale for allocations was accepted by the Board of Governors
in June 1964 and the practice of incremental adjustments, when
possible, has been largely followed since that time.
With the diminution of acquisition funding in the past several
years together with an increase in programmes and courses it
became apparent that this procedure was becoming inadequate
and inequitable to meet the changing requirements of the in-
structional and research programmes at the university.
.4

 
MIM
SWith our automated loan system we were able to produce
data for our collection usage analysis. An additional variable
using average book prices per subject was also introduced into
the allocation formula. These two components, usage and price,
have given us objective guide-lines to aid us in the determination
of subject allocations. We have not taken this formulation as
representing the absolute or a panacea of mathematical exactitude
but rather a rational approach to assist us in answering a problem
that is man-made and defies a single solution
(see
Appendix II).
3. Determining policies governing loan of Library
resources and the other service aspects of the
Library system
Reserve Loan
It is the practice of the Reserve Loan Supervisor, at the end
of every semester, to send to each faculty member a statistical
summary of the usage of materials that he/she has placed on
reserve. From this statistical evidence it became apparent
that many of the titles and the multiple copies of titles were not
being used. Examples were cited of over a hundred titles with
two or three hundred copies for a single course; the actual
usage did not support one-tenth of those available.
A proposal from the Library to reduce the number of mono-
graph titles to thirty per course was discussed by the Committee
and their recommendation of the proposal was approved. Photo-
copies of articles for courses have not been reduced in numbers of
copies.
Reserve Reading Area
The need for a limited area adjacent to the reserve collection
...5

 
-5-
has been a desire of the Loans Division
for
some time and the
Committee strongly recommended that such an area take priority
at a time when space is available on the third floor.
Proposal to Extend Borrowing to the Community
by Fee
As background to this proposal it should be noted that Library
cards are also used as identification for entrance to the gymn-
asium and the theatre by students, faculty and staff. Cards are
further issued on a reciprocal basis by request to graduate
students and faculty at UBC and UVic; faculty at B. C. Community
Colleges and BCIT, also Alumni and faculty from outside B. C.
doing a research assignment at SFU. Permission may be given to
others on the approval of the University Librarian.
The Library card has a multiplicity of uses and acts as an
identification card and therefore its preparation and issuance,
plus certain logistical factors, is the responsibility of the Registrar's
Office not the Library. As the request for borrowing Library
materials by persons outside the university community impinges
on other areas of the university the Registrar is examining the
implications of the library card as a multi-purpose card and a re-
port is being prepared by his office in an attempt to resolve this
question. The committee is waiting to read this report before
making recommendations on this proposal.
Library Penalties Appeal Committee
The creation of the LPAC as a standing committee of Senate
has created a jurisdictional problem in that recommendations
from the LPAC to Senate, having effect on Library policy, may
be implemented by Senate before the SLC has been invited to
comment therein.
. .6

 
• ?
a
-6-
This matter is of sufficient importance to justify consulta-
between the Committees concerned and it is hoped to resolve it
at that level.
4. Drawing up rules and regulations governing conduct
in the Library Building
Standards for Library Readers
A. statement covering this charge to the committee was pre-
pared and recommended as a standard of conduct within the
Library dated November 26, 1970. No revision has been nec-
essary (see Appendix III).
IV. OTHER ACTIVITIES
During the course of the meetings of the Senate Library Committee
other topics were discussed that fall outside the charge given to the
committee but are germane to their interests.
Proposed Revised Terms of Reference
The Terms of Reference of the committee were reviewed
and have been recommended to go to Senate for consideration.
It was agreed that no action be taken until after the new rules
for Senate have been ratified and the Departmental Review takes
place so that any comments the reviewers may make relating
to the SLC may be considered.
Departmental Review
Three reviewers were invited by the university to evaluate
the University Library and make recommendations. Members
of the team were: Royce Butler, Director of Libraries,
• . University of Manitoba; Donald Redmond, Chief Librarian,
Queen's University; Ralph Stierwalt, Assistant Librarian,
University of Western Ontario. The report is being examined

 
S ?
I
-7-
0
by both librarians and the Academic Vice President and certain
aspects of the report will doubtless come before the committee
in due course.
Library Building Expansion
The Board of Governors, at their meeting in September 1973,
authorized Robert F. Harrison & Associates, architects, to pre-
pare preliminary drawings of the two floor expansion of the Library.
These drawings were approved by the Board at their March meet-
ing and final drawings will be completed and tendered in August.
Construction begins in September with .completion in late Fall, 1975.
Philip Stigger
Assistant Professor, History
Chairman
:
d c r
16/5/74
.
S

 
Appendix
DRAFT
2.1 ?
December 1, 1973
SUBJECT: ?
COLLECTION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
GENERAL
The following pages contain the complete statement of the
Collection Policies and Procedures as approved by the
University Librarian on
is

 
S
S
CONTENTS
Introduction
-
1.1 ?
Library Provides Materials By Borrowing and By Purchasing
1.2 Criteria to Determine That Materials Are to Be Purchased
2. General Collections Policies
2.1
Support of Teaching Programme
2.1.1 ?
General Collection
2. 1. 2 ?
Reserve Collection
5
2. 1. 3
?
Non-Print Collections
2.2
Support of Faculty and Graduate Research
2. 2.1
?
Definition of Research Materials
2. 2. 2
?
Criteria for Purchase of Research Materials
2. 2. 3
?
Special Collections and Archives
2.2.3.1 ?
Manuscripts
Z.3
Support of Non-Credit Activities
2.4
General and Current Interest Material
2.5
Heavily-Used Materials
2.5.1 ?
Multiple Copies
2.5.2 ?
Replacements
2.5.3
?
Temporary Reserve
1.

 
-2-
• ?
2.6 Low-Use Materials
2. 6.1
?
Low-Use Storage
2. 6. 2
?
Withdrawal of Materials
Z. 6. 3
?
Cancellation of Serials Subscriptions
2.7 Cooperation With Other Libraries in Collections Development
2.7.1 ?
TRIUL
2. 7. 2
?
Public Libraries
3.
Policies on Specific Collections
3.1
Monographs
3.2
Serials
3. 3
Reference Works
3.4
Government Publications
3.5
Microforms
3.6
Curriculum Collections
3.7
Maps
3.8
Theses and Dissertations
4.
Communications With Faculty and Students
4.1 How the Library Knows What to Collect
4.2 University Committees
4. 2. 1
?
Senate Graduate Studies Committee
4. 2. 2 Senate Library Committee
4.3 Resource Surveys
S4.4 Usage Analysis

 
mm
5.
Book Budget and Allocations
5.1
Maximizing
Book Funds
5.2 Responsibility for the Preparation of the Book Budget
5.3 Allocations
5.4 Miscellaneous
5.4.1
?
Photocopied Materials
5. 4. 2 ?
Replacement Costs
5.4.3 ?
Reserve Books
6.
Responsibilities of the Assistant University Librarian for Collections
and Public Services
6.1 Implementation and Revision of Collection Policy
6.2 Summary of Collecting Objectives by Subject

 
S
1. ?
Introduction
1.1 ?
The Library has two principal ways of providing the published
resources required by the University community:
a)
purchasing
materials to be added to its own collection
b)
borrowing from other libraries through Inter-Library Loan.
The policies and procedures presented here are concerned ex-
clusively with purchased materials and are used by Collection
Librarians to guide them in their decisions to purchase, store
and discard materials.
1.2 A publication is purchased when it appears that most of the
following criteria will apply.
a)
It relates to courses and programmes offered at the Uni-
versity.
b)
It will be useful to a substantial number of faculty and
students rather than to a few individuals.
c)
It is of strong general interest and has sufficient intellect-
ual content to be of concern to an academic readership.
d)
It is not an acquisition that needlessly duplicates a re-
source at the University of British Columbia or other near-
by institutions.
5
...2

 
- a-
2. General Collection Policies
2.1 Support of Teaching Programme
The first priority in the development of collections is to provide
the information resources needed for the University teaching
programme. Since most courses are undergraduate there is
emphasis on the selection of current publications, both mono-
graphic and serial, over a broad range of subjects. The Lib-
rary accomplishes the objective of supporting courses by de-
veloping the General collection (2.1.1), the Reserve collection
and non-print collections (2.1. 3).
Z. 1. 1 ?
The General Collection is the open-shelf collection.
As a major information resource of the University,
it must support both teaching and research (2. 2. 2).
Since providing materials for the teaching programme
is the first collections objective, the Library uses
most of the book budget to acquire current and retro-
spective publications on the subjects of the courses.
Unless there is demonstrated demand for multiple
copies (2.5.1), only one copy of each title is added to
this collection so that the broadest possible coverage
of the subject matter is obtained. The General Col-
lection contains materials that are letterpress and
microform, current and retrospective, serial and
monographic.

 
-3-
2.1.2
The Reserve Collection, a closed stack collection,
exists to provide all students fair and reasonable
access to their required reading materials without
excessively duplicating holdings. While not attempt-
ing to provide all the materials needed by students,
through the establishment of this service, the Lib-
rary recognizes there is a valid demand for multiple
copies (2. 5. 1) created by the teaching programme.
It accommodates this demand by:
a)
acquiring multiple copies of readings required
or recommended by the faculty member giving
a course, and
b)
lending this material under loan regulations
especially designed to insure that each copy of
each book receives maximum use.
The Reserve Desk supervisor, in discussion with
faculty members, determines the number of copies
to be bought. This decision is based on the expected
enrolment and, if deemed relevant, past usage sta-
tistics. In any case, the ratio of one copy per ten
students is rarely exceeded.
2. 1. 3
?
The Library has the responsibility to build non-print
media collections as well as print collections. Non
...4

 
MAE
print media are defined here as any physical format
used to disseminate information that is not print or
microphotographic copy of printed matter. Standard
examples are audio tape, slides, video tape, films,
magnetic tape, and punched cards. Characteristically,
most non-print media are used to aid teaching (machine
readable forms are an exception); they often have a
high unit cost; they require expensive special equip-
ment to be used; and, they present unique problems in
regard to cataloguing, storing, and servicing. For
these reasons, and the fact that in most disciplines
non-print media at an academic level are not extensive,
the Library policy is to limit purchases to items where
there is a clearly demonstrated need.
The Collections Librarians keep themselves informed
about the current "publishing" of non-print media and
select materials, usually in consultation with faculty,
giving full consideration to the impact a purchase will
have on the budget and, as a result, on the acquisition
of printed materials. In all cases non-print material
is acquired only if it meets the same criteria applied
to printed sources.
...5

 
-5-
2. 2 Support of Faculty and Graduate Research
2. 2. 1
?
Research collections are defined in this policy as
materials which are used primarily by faculty and
graduate students to complete projects for the pur-
pose of scholarly publication or the fulfillment of a
requirement for a paper, thesis, or dissertation.
The content of these materials is often more special-
ized, detailed, and extensive than is required by
undergraduates writing essays. They are also fre-
quently out-of-print and in languages other than
English.
2. 2. 2
?
As most of the book budget is required to support the
teaching programme, the development of research
collections takes second priority, and as a result,
faculty and graduate students have to rely heavily on
Inter-Library Loans and the collections at the Univer-
sity of British Columbia. Nevertheless, in so far as
possible, the Library does attempt to build research
collections. After budgetary provision has been made
for current publications and the renewal of serials
subscriptions germane to the teaching programme,
allocations are made to acquire research materials.

 
-6-
?
Material for this purpose is generally expected to
meet the following criteria:
a)
It should relate to the graduate programmes of
a Department.
b)
It should be useful to more than one member of
the faculty, or graduate student, or more than
one research project.
c)
It should be useful also in a more limited way to
undergraduates in their research efforts even
though the material is to be acquired primarily
for faculty and graduate research.
d)
It should not duplicate a resource at the Univer-
sity of British Columbia or other institution in
the Province if it is available by extended inter-
library loan or can be consulted by visiting that
library.
Though materials in Special Collections and Archives
are used frequently by undergraduates, they are viewed
by the Library as being fundamentally a research col-
lection. A full statement of the policies on this collec-
t;on was approved by the University Librarian on July 17,
1972 (Library Policy 2.3).
Though some materials are shelved in Special Collec-
tions only for preservation purposes, the collection is
basically in two parts:
...7

 
-7-
a)
Special Collections, the core of which is a collec-
tion of post-war experimental and avant-garde
poetry known as the Contemporary Literature Col-
lection.
b)
Archives, which acts as the archives for the Uni-
versity (approved by the Board of Governors, 1968)
and which contains archival records which are the
property of the Municipality of Burnaby.
It is the policy of the Library to continue the develop-
ment of these collections, as specified in Library Pol-
icy Z. 3, in as vigorous and definitive a manner as fin-
ancial constraints permit.
2.2.3.1 Manuscripts are collected as part of both
Special Collections and Archives. Their
content must relate strictly to designated
areas of specialization within these col-
lections, and they are selected only after
full consideration with faculty. The Lib-
rary has adopted a detailed policy on the
acquisition, processing, and use of manu-
scripts (cf. Library Policy 2.3.1).
2.3 Support of Non-Credit Activities
In some instances, non-credit courses or activities do re-
quire published resources that can only be supplied by the

 
-8-
Library. After, having met the requirements of the credit
courses and research at the University, the Library will
acquire materials to support non-credit courses within the
limits of its budget. Librarians will make every effort to
keep themselves informed about the collections needed for
these activities and select titles accordingly.
2.4 General and Current Interest Materials
At any point there are topics of current and, often, general
interest to the University community that do not necessarily
relate to the courses then being offered. Publications con-
cerned with significant political and social events, emerging
disciplines, and new areas of study and investigation are
usually required by academic readers for their personal intel-
lectual growth as well as for possible'use in a course reading
list. The purchase of'these publications is not allowed to di-
minish Library support of courses and major research objec-
tives. An attempt is made, also, to avoid a duplication of
services offered by the local public libraries (2.7. 2).
2.5 Heavily-Used Materials
2. 5.1 ?
The need for 'multiple copies 'is accommodated, for
the most part, by the Reserve Collection (2.1. 2).
However, a small number of extra copies are added
to the General Collection for the following reasons:

 
BLOM
a)
If there is considerable public discussion
about a new publication, and there is reason
to believe the University community shares
this interest, an additional copy or copies
may be acquired.
b)
At the end of each semester the Collection
Librarians review loans records and order
additional copies of the few most requested
titles if they feel that interest in these books
will persist for several semesters.
c)
Since Special Collections materials do not
circulate and are not shelved in the open
stacks, selected titles are duplicated and the
second copy is added to the General Collection.
ci) Because three specialized Reference Service
areas are maintained it is occasionally necessary
to have added copies of some general and basic
reference publications.
2. 5. 2 ?
Replacement copies are obtained in most cases when
a heavily used book is damaged, lost, or stolen.
However, as seldom used books too may have to be
replaced for these reasons, each title identified for
re-order, is reviewed by the appropriate Collection
• 10

 
- 10 -
lu
Librarian to determine if it is still required. Re-
placements are not usually ordered if there are
other copies already in the collection, or if the
Library has a more recent edition. If a replace-
ment is to be ordered, an attempt will be made to
secure the same edition, but in some cases it may
be desirable to order a later edition.
2. 5. 2 ?
Single copy titles are placed on temporary reserve
when three recalls have been submitted in one sem-
ester. Materials requested this frequently are re-
viewed by Collection Librarians and, possibly, dup-
licated for the General Collection or the Reserve
Collection.
2.6 Low-Use Materials
2. 6.1
?
Generally, materials are placed in low-use storage
when the following conditions apply:
a)
There has been no more than one request over
a period of three years.
b)
The material is shelved in an area that urgently
needs space for
in-coming
high-demand current
materials.
In
most cases, material
in
storage can be delivered
to the reader within twenty-four hours or less. After
• 11

 
- Ii -
?
being placed in storage the demand for specific titles
is carefully observed, and they are returned to the
open shelf if it increases. Materials for which there
is zero demand over a three-year period are con-
sidered for withdrawal from the collection (cf. 2. 6. 2)
or are retained in storage for another three-year
period of observation.
2. 6. 2 ?
A publication is withdrawn from the collection when
most of the following conditions apply:
a)
It has not been used in at least three years on
the open shelf.
b)
It has not been requested from low-use storage
more than once a year.
c)
It is also available at the University of British
Columbia, the University of Victoria, or other
library in the Province; and it has been con-
firmed that that library will not withdraw its
copy and is willing to make it available to S. F. U.
readers.
d)
It is available via Inter-Library Loan from other
Canadian and United States libraries.
e)
It is no longer related to existing courses or re-
search activity because of changes in the Univer-
sity calendar or the faculty membership.
12

 
f
0
- 12 -
2. 6. 3
?
Serials subscriptions are reviewed for cancellation
when the conditions described above (2. 6. 2) apply.
In addition, it may be necessary to cancel subscrip-
tions to lesser-used serials because of budgetary
constraints (cf. 3.2).
Collection Librarians will confer with Department
Library Representatives about titles, monographic
or serial, that are being considered for withdrawal.
2.7 Cooperation With Other Libraries in Collections Development
2.7.1
?
TRIUL (Tr-University Libraries) is an informal or-
ganization of the three university libraries in British
Columbia. One of its major committees is concerned
with comparing the make-up and growth of the three
collections. The committee attempts to establish the
general outlines of a coordinated collections policy,
to eliminate needless duplication of acquisitions costing
approximately $500 or more, and to rationalii.t spe-
cific areas of collections, e. g. government publications,
microforms, serials, etc..
TRIUL is concerned also with improving access to
the Provinical university collections by faculty, grad-
uate, and undergraduate students.
.13

 
S
S
- 13 -
The S.F. U. Library participates in TRIUL in order
to increase the number of unique titles in the major
academic collections, to eliminate unnecessary dup-
lication, and to make all area resources more readily
available to the S. F. U. community.
2. 7. 2
?
Public library services of the lower mainland are
available to all members of the academic community.
The Library generally avoids the duplication of kinds
of material available from those collections, e. g.:
detective fiction, how-to books, etc.
3. Policies on Specific Collections
3.1 Monographs
Traditionally the largest component of an academic collection
has consisted of monographs with serials (3.2) forming the
next most sizeable segment.
The emphasis on monographs within libraries, of course, is
a reflection of the importance they have in academic writing
and publishing. Until there is some significant change in the
balance between monographic and serial publishing, the Lib-
rary will continue to build a letterpress collection with pro-
portions of approximately 80% monographs and 20% serials.
S
14

 
- 14 -
The one exception to this rule is the science collection, where
there has always been greater reliance on serials than mono-
graphs (cf. 3. 2). Science monographs will comprise approx-
imately 4016 of that collection.
3.2 5erials
Though serial publications represent a relatively small por-
tion of the letterpress collection (approximately 20%) they re-
quire a large portion of the book budget. This is because most
subscriptions have to be renewed annually, and as a rule these
costs inflate dramatically.
Though the Library is committed to keeping primary emphasis
on the collecting of monographs (cf. 3. 1) it must also provide
a serials collection that gives adequate support to teaching and
research. A policy is required, therefore, to keep these two
areas of the collection in balance. This is achieved in the
following ways:
a) Subscriptions to new serials are approved on a highly se-
lective basis; in most subjects related to the programmes
offered at the University the serials collection now (1973)
provides the basic periodicals, and new subscriptions are
required only to secure the more important titles that are
published; the adoption of additional programmes by the
.
• .15

 
f
- 15 - ?
-
University, however, does necessitate the acquisition of
titles that are fundamental to the new discipline.
b)
Each proposed new subscription is reviewed by the Col-
lection Librarian, the Collection Division Head, and the
Assistant University Librarian for Collections and Public
Services before a decision is reached.
c)
The serials lists of the University of British Columbia
and the University of Victoria are used to determine if a
subscription from S. F. U. would duplicate their holdings;
each university library informs the other universities
about subscriptions to newly published serials it is con-
sidering. In many
instances
duplication is desirable, but
this exchange of
information
is used to reduce it to a mini-
mum.
d)
The use of serials within different disciplines is moni-
tored on a
continuous
basis; a list of low-use titles is pre-
pared from time to time by Collection Librarians for
faculty advice on possible cancellation. Funds freed by
cancellations may be used for important new subscriptions.
e)
As a guideline, an attempt is made to keep the allocation
for new subscriptions to approximately 1. 5 -. 2% of the
total book budget; when more funds are needed than pro-
vided by the allocation, every effort is made to cancel
subscriptions that are not being used before the allocation
is increased.
.16

 
3.3 Reference Works
A reference collection is a non-circulating collection of pub-
lications that is designed to supply concise, factual data or
assist readers in the bibliographical identification of journal
articles and other publications. It contains such materials
as guides and manuals, bibliographies, indexes and abstracts,
encyclopedias, dictionaries of special terms, handbooks, etc..
A reference collection is maintained in each of the Collection
Divisions: Humanities, Science, and Social Science. In ad-
dition, large bibliographical compilations such as the cata-
logues of the Library of Congress and the British Museum are
S
?
shelved in the Acquisitions Division, where they
are required
to process SFU accessions.
3.4 Government Publications
Government publications are defined as publications (including
non-print media) issued directly or under the sponsorship of
any office of a legally organized government regardless of
level. The Library is committed to the development of such
a collection in support of the teaching and research objectives
that prevail at SFU. To assist in the achievement of this goal,
the Library requested, and was granted, full depository status
for the publications of Information Canada (effective August,
.
?
1969). Because of this the Library receives one free copy of
17

 
S
.
-
1.7 -
most English or bi-lingual publications distributed by the Queen's
Printer. The Library also collects. provincial and municipal
documents as well as publications from other countries and inter-
national organizations. Emphasis is on Great Britain, United
States, and the United Nations. (cf. Library Policy no. 2.4 for
a detailed policy on the government publications collection.)
3.5 Microforms
Microforms are documents that have been micro_photographically
copied on film, fiche, or paper. They require special reading
equipment and are usually physically, separated from other library
collections because the storage and service requirements are not
compatible with conventional printed materials.
The selection of microforrns is guided by the same general col-
lection policies used in the selection of letterpress publications.
They are collected by the Library because, in most cases, the
material has been out-of-print and can be acquired in no other
form. Theses and dissertations (cf. 3. 8), being mostly type-
script, are frequently available on microfilm only.
Generally the Library acquires letterpress rather than micro-
form when there is a choice. However, many newspapers and
periodicals are obtained in this form, rather than paper copy,
to save shelf space and to have a more easily preserved record.
S
OM
18

 
- 18 -
3.6 Curriculum Collection
This collection is developed and maintained by the Library as a
physically separate collection unit to support the Professional
Development Programme of the Faculty of Education. The fol-
lowing materials are systematically acquired for this collection:
a)
all textbooks listed in the British Columbia List of Prescribed
Texts
b)
textbooks used in other provincial, state, or city school
systems - purchased selectively
c)
course outlines from all Canadian provinces and selected
American cities.
?
d) major works in children's literature
e) learning kits, film strips and loops, etc. - purchased Se-
lectively.
3.7 Maps
The Map Collection acquires and catalogues topographic and
thematic maps relevant to the University curriculum. There is
general world coverage in small scales and coverage in large
scale for Canada, United States, Africa, some Latin American
countries, and selected European countries. Thematic maps
with emphasis on these areas are collected particularly in
climatology, biogeography, geomorphology, demography, re-
sources, and urban and regional planning.
19

 
?
.1
-
19 -
3.8 Theses and Dissertations
1
Generally,
it is not Library policy to acquire M.A. theses or
Ph. D. dissertations as permanent additions to the
collection.
It is expected that these materials will usually be purchased by
the reader through Inter-Library Loan. In exceptional cases
a thesis or dissertation may be acquired when its subject deals
with
a
high collecting priority, and if the quality of the work is
outstanding. Normally these materials will be acquired in
microform although xerographic copy will also
be considered
if frequent use
of the material is anticipated.
••
Communications With Faculty and Students
4.1 How the Library
Knows What to Collect
To accomplish its goal of acquiring the published materials
that are needed
by faculty and students, the Library must
have up-to-date
knowledge of what subjects are being taught
and researched. It must also have accurate information about
new programmes and courses that are to be offered in the
near
future
80
that
it can gather the necessary materials before
they are requested.
To insure that it receives complete and accurate information,
the Library maintains a
staff of professional librarians,
des-
ignated
throughout this policy as "Collection Librarians", each
of whom is assigned responsibility for the development of spe-
cific subject collections.
I--
20

 
20
Each Collection Librarian is responsible also for establishing
communication with faculty departments, undergraduates, and
graduate students. These communications are accomplished as
follows
a)
Liaison is maintained with the Faculty Library Represent-
ative to keep informed about departmental requirements;
this channel is also used to keep the faculty department in-
formed about library developments.
b)
Collection Librarians are encouraged to discuss library
resources with all faculty who make primary
use
of the
materials; this kind of contact also provides the Library
?
information on the research interests of individual faculty
members.
c)
Each Collection Librarian is required to spend approxi-
mately one third of his/her time at the public reference
desk answering the questions of students and faculty; this
is a major
?
source of information on the resource needs
of un ergraduates and graduate students, but it also pro-
vides additional information on faculty requirements.
d)
Each Collection Librarian invites graduate students who are
using the materials under his/her responsibility to discuss
their research needs.
e)
All Inter-Library Loax requests are reviewed by Collection
Librarians to determine if materials are being borrowed
often enough to justify purchasing them for the SFU collec-
tion.
21

 
- 21 -
f)
?
At the end of each semester, Collection Librarians review
the usage of the Reserve Collection to determine if some
titles should be duplicated and to keep themselves informed
of the bibliographic coverage of each course.
4..Z University Committees
In addition to the prsonal contacts with students and faculty
described in 4. 1, the Library administration is represented on
the membership of several academic committees and it regularly
receives the minutes of the Academic Planning Committee,
Faculty Curriculum Committees, and the Senate Committee on
Undergraduate Studies. The University Librarian is an exofficio
?
member of Senate, and Collection Librarians participate on
various academic committees (e.g. Canadian Studies Committee).
4. 2. 1
?
The Senate Graduate Studies Committee, of which the
?
University Librarian is a member, is the major source
of
information
on the development of gi aduate courses
and programmes. This committee requires that the
Library report on the state of its resources in regard
to new programme proposals before it makes a decision
(cf. 4.3).
4. 2. 2 Though the Senate Library Committee has been estab-
lished by Senate to advise the University Librarian on
library matters generally, it specifically concerns
22

 
- 22 -
f
itself with collections development when it reviews th
proposed allocation of the book budget submitted by the
Librarian each year.
4.3 Resource Surveys
A resource survey is a thorough comparison of S.F. U. holdings
with standard and authoritative bibliographies in a given subject
area to determine the strengths and weaknesses of the collection.
The results of the survey are used to guide future selection.
.
Such a survey is most often done in response to a request from
the Senate Graduate Studies Committee (cf. 4. Z. 1) when it is
considering a new programme proposal. However, at times
they are also done in response to a faculty or department re-
quest, or if any of the Collection Librarians and/or the Library
administration feel it is desirable to examine an area of the col-
lection closely.
4.4 Usage Analysis
Since the Library has. an
obligation to acquire materials that
are needed by the University community and, conversely, avoid
purchasing those that are not needed, it is necessary to study
how the collections are being used on a continuous basis.
The following data, which is occasionally supplemented by a
use-study in a specific collection area, is periodically gathered
and reviewed:
.23

 
-23-
Records of monograph loans and recalls
In-house shelving statistics
Reserve Collection loans
Inter-Library Loan requests
Lost and missing books
From this review, Collection Librarians obtain the following
information:
a)
Specific subject areas are identified in terms of a scale
ranging from most used down to unused.
b)
Individual titles of the most heavily used materials are
cited.
• ?
c) Individual titles that have not been used over a period of
?
several years are also cited.
d) ?
Titles to be replaced.
This information guides Collection Librarians when they are
selecting new accessions, and it is used by them to make de-
cisions on the duplication, storage, or withdrawal of specific
titles.
5. Book Budget and Allocations
5.1 Maximizing Book' Funds
By a continuous close scrutiny of salaries and operating costs,
the Library attempts to use' as much of its budget as possible
to develop the collections. However, funds must also be pro-
vided for processing costs, reference services, and adminis-
24

 
.
f
-24-
tration. The Library, therefore, recognizes that it is res-
ponsible for
maintaining
the most efficient procedures possible
so that salary and operating expenditures do not unreasonably
constrict the book budget.
5.2 Responsibility for the Preparation of the Book Budget
The University Librarian has overall responsibility, within the
Library staff, for the preparation of the book budget. As part
of his responsibility for
planning
the total Library budget he de-
termines the size of the book budget in relation to salary and
operating costs.
The Assistant University Librarian for Collections and Public
Services is responsible for the preparation of allocations within
the book budget (cf. 5.3). This responsibility is executed by
coordinating
recommendations from Collection Librarians,
Faculty Library Representatives, and the Senate Library Com-
mittee. Collections usage data, departmental enrolment, etc.,
are considered in the process of making allocations.
The Senate Library Committee annually reviews and advises
the University Librarian on the proposed book budget and the
allocations.
5.3 Allocations
The book budget is allocated in the following ways:
25

 
- as -
a)
The total budget is divided into two parts, one for mono-
graphs and one for serials.
b)
The serials portion is then sub-divided into allocations
for renewals, new subscriptions, backfiles, and govern-
ment publications;, except for government publications,
serials funds are not allocated to subject disciplines; the
money for renewals, new subscriptions, and backfiles is
distributed among the Humanities, Sciences, Social Sci-
ences, and Library general accounts.
c)
The monograph portion is sub-divided by academic sub-
ject; further sub-divisions are made within a subject allo-
cation for current and retrospective materials, govern-
ment publications, and non-print media.
New allocations are added to the book budget as required by the
development of curriculum.
5.4 Miscellaneous
5.4.1 ?
Photocopied materials that are to become permanent
additions to the S.F.U. collection are charged to the
appropriate book budget allocation. The only exception
to this policy is theses and dissertation by S.F.U. stu-
dents which are paid for
.
by
the student or the Depart-
ment.
26

 
- 26 -
5.4. 2
?
Replacement costs for lost, missing, or damaged
materials are charged to the appropriate allocation
of the book budget. Revenue from readers who have
been charged replacement costs goes into a special
account established for this purpose, and then funds
can be transferred to other allocations or used di-
rectly from this account to replace materials.
5. 4. 3 ?
Reserve books are charged to the Mark Collins Fund
until the annual grant from the fund is exhausted.
Only then are Reserve books charged to the subject
allocations.
6. Responsibilities of the Assistant University Librarian for Collections
and Public Services
6.1 Implementation and Revision of Collection Policy
The Assistant University Librarian for Collections and Public
Services is responsible for the implementation and continuous
supervision of this policy, as well as its future revisions.
6.2 Summary ofCollecting Objectives by Subject
The Assistant University Librarian for Collections and Public
Services is responsible for preparing and maintaining an up-
to-date summary of collecting objectives in terms of the var-
ious academic disciplines. A statement of these objectives,
ED
at any time, will be available upon request.

 
SIMON. FRASER UNIVERSITY
?
Appendix I I
?
MEMORANDUM
To ...................... .......a...Likrary .Cornmt
.
t
.
e
?
?
.From .......
?
..........La..y. Thorn
a.s
?
................... ?
Assistant University Librarian
................................................................................................................................................for. Collections., and Public..Servic es
Subject ... .. ...
197...
5
,
Book .
Date.....................................1,,
Attached is the 1st draft of the 1974
/75
book budget. Please note
that the allocation pattern is based arbitrarily on the current budget
total of $520, 000. After the new real total is known, the allocation
ratios will be applied to that figure. The current budget has been in-
cluded for comparison. The summary at the bottom of the page per-
tains to 1974/75.
The procedure we have used to distribute these funds is as follows:
I. An estimate was made of subscription renewal costs. This
came to $240, 000, leaving $280, 000 for all other materials.
2.
An estimate was made of the cost to keep pace with current
S ?
monograph publishing. This figure was put at $200, 000 which
left some $80, 000 for new subscriptions, backfiles, govern-
ment publications, retrospective monographs, and non-print
materials. The summary at the bottom of the page shows what
allocations were made for these categories.
3.
Within this framework, funds for monographs (current and
retrospective), government documents and non-print materials
were then allocated by subject. (This is approximately $241, 000,
or 46% of the total budget.) The totals shown for each discipline
are to cover requirements for materials in all these categories.
Renewals, new subscriptions, and backfiles on the other hand
are covered by the general accounts 981-984.
4.
To insure that the portion of the budget distributed by subject
was allocated effectively and objectively
we
analyzed collections
growth and usage for the past two years and reviewed estimates
by each Collection Librarian on the individual lines of the budget.
These figures along with the current budget gave us three pos-
sible allocation patterns. A small committee was set up, and
they reconciled the alternatives taking into consideration such
critical matters as new courses and changes in programme
S ?
emphasis. A general description of the method used to relate
past collections growth and usage to budget planning is also
attached.
LET /dap
Att.

 
.
901
1st DRAFT
Ec. &
Corn.
BOOK BUDGET
1974/75
1973/74
$ ?
25, 600
1974/75
$ ?
33, 000
905
English
39,000
28,000
910
Geography
9,550
8,000
922
Linguistics
10,000
7,000
924
Mod. Lang. Lit.
14,000
9,000
928
Philosophy
8,000
6,000
930
Po. Sci.
7,500
10,000
931
Sociology
6, 350
10,000
932
Anthropology
5,550
6,000
933
Archaeology
2,300
4,000
935
Psychology
2,900
5,000
940
Curriculum Materials
12,000
12, 000
942
Education
5,700
8,000
944 Ath. ?
& Rec.
500
1,000
946
Kinesiology
4,250
7,000
950
Fine Arts
9,000
8,000
952
955
Communications
Comp. Sd.
2,500
1,000
3, 000
1,000
960
Bio. ?
Sci.
15,000
13,000
965
Chemistry
4,900
7,000
970
Mathematics
7,000
8,000
975
Physics
5,000
6,000
981
Soc. Sci. Gen.
10,900
10,500
982
Hum. Gen.
14,000
10, 500
983
Sci. Gen.
11,000
11, 000
984
Lib.
Gen.
231,700
247,000
988
Hist. Amer.
8,500
15,000
992
Hist.
?
N. E. /Africa
8,500
10,000
993
Hist. Europe
8,500
10,000
997
Hist. Gen
29,300
6,000
TOTAL ALLOCATIONS
?
$
520,000
$
?
520,000
Monographs (Curr. + Retro)
?
$ 222,000
New Subs. ?
9,000
Backfiles ?
23, 000
Gov. Docs.
?
20,000
Renewals ?
240, 000
? Media ?
6,000
$ 520,000
LET /dap

 
Use of the Allocation.Formula• in this Years' Book Budget
As the formula is still under development and as there are
still some conceptual problems to be disposed of, the book budget was
developed with the figures derived from theformula serving in
advisory capacity.
The procedure used was as follows:
I. The percentage of the collections usage was calculated
for each subject area from figures derived from our
collections analysis programs - e.g. Economics accounted
for
10-.7459.'
in
1973,
Geography
2.132?.
2. The loans per volume ratios were calculated for
1972
and
1973.
The
1973
ratio was divided by the
1972
ratio
to give a comparative increase/decrease-in-usage figure.
E.g. if in
1972 subject area I had
5
loans per volume
subject area
2
had
3
loans per volume
subject area
3
had
1
loans per volume
and in
1973
these figures became:
. ?
area 1 ?
4
loans per volume
area
2 ?
2
loans per volume
area
3 ?
5
loans per volume
the comparative ratio would be area 1 = 0.8, area
2 = 0.67,
area
3 = 1.25.
3.
The mean of these comparative ratios was taken, and the
deviation from the mean calculated. These deviations were
expressed as a percentage (Add them all up, divide the sum
into 100, and multiply each one by the quotient).
4. The figures thus gained were added to the percent-usage figures.
5.
Steps similar to those in
3
were taken with average book prices
per subject area and multiplied by the sum in
4.
At this point we had a usage factor modified by a growth/
decline in usage factor, adjusted for average book cost.
This was the figure used as a guide in preparing the
allocations.
.
?
L1 /i
M. Sanderson/cd
February
7, 1974

 
Appendix I I I
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
?
Off
ice
of
the
STANDARDS FOR LIBRARY READERS
?
University Librarian
Concern for the rights of all readers is the reason for the following standards
1.
The Library is operated on the. open stack principle and all readers have
free access to the book collections. This system is based on the belief
that readers wish to browse in the collections.
2.
There is an extreme shortage of study space in the Library. Please keep
the available, space clean and use it only for study purposes..
3.
Please respect the rights of your, fellow readers by keeping conversation
'to a minimum while in the study areas.
4.
Please take care of what you borrow: readers are responsible for the
replacement costs of Library material damaged or lost while charged out
to them.
5.
Fines are charged to all readers for overdue books and media material.
6.
Please place books taken from the shelves for use in the Library on the
wooden shelving provided in the corridors of the collections floors. They
will be picked up from there for reshelving. Reference works should be
used in the reference areas and not removed to other parts of the Library.
7.
It is necessary to present brief cases and books for inspection at the exit.
8.
Seating for readers, other than in study rooms, cannot be reserved.
Books, papers, and coats left in carrels for that purpose are subject to
removal. Books in carrels are also cleared on a nightly basis.
9.
Individuals and organizations can use some areas of the Library for display
or other purposes with the permission of the University Librarian.
10.
The Library is not responsible for lost or stolen *articles. Such losses
should be reported immediately to Traffic and Security.
11.
Readers may sn-ioke only in he lounge areas or study rooms provided for
this purpose on the collection floors.
12.
Readers are requested not to.bring'beverages to the collection floors.
13.
Animals will not be allowed in the Library.
Senate Library Committee, November 26, 1970

Back to top