1. Page 1
    2. Page 2

 
- ?
.. -. ....- ?
. ?
-
'
SiMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
FOR INFORMATION
MIMORANDUM
?
S.79-ll
(as
adjusted following Senate,
January 8, 1979)
SENATE
.
?
.From.. SNATh CQ)9(ITTU...QW.AG DA...MW.1ULS....
Subject.
?
STATEMENTS PROPOSED. FOR INCLUSION ...... .
Date ..... DEC.SEL.2.7,...19.78
.
...... ............................... ... .... ... ...
IN CALENDAR
It
• i9
proposed that statements be included in the Undergraduate
Calendar and the Graduate Calendar as follows - (subject to
legal review of wording when appropriate).
1.
LIMITATION OF ENROU(ENT
The University reserves the right to limit enrol-
ment and to limit the registration in, or to cancel
any of the courses listed. The curricula may also be
changed, as deemed advisable by the Senate of the
University.
2.
LIMIT OF RESPONSIBILITY (heading not to be included)
SIMON FRASER
UNIVERSITY Pake4ill reasonable efforts
to ensure that its classes and courses of instruction
proceed on a regular basis and without interruption.
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY does not accept responsibility
for the interruption or termination of any class or
course of instruction which results from firs, riot,
labor disruption or other event which occurs despite
such efforts.
3.
STUDENT CONDUCT
The University does not assume parental obligations
or responsibilities, but holds the student responsible
in matters of personal conduct. Any student whose
behavior causes Or is likely to cause wrongful injury
to
any person, or damage to the University or its
property, or who unlawfully enters a building on the
campus, is subject to disciplinary action and may be
suspended or expelled from the University, subject to
appeal
to
the Senate.

 
-2-
4. INTELLECTUAL HONEST, ACADEMIC DISCIPLINE
The standards and reputation of a university are
a share responsibility of faculty and students. A
prime aspect of the university's activities is concerned
with the teaching-learning
function. Intellectual honesty
is a cornerstone of the development and acquisition of
knowledge which itself is cumulative and dependent on the
contribution of others for further advances. Intellectual
honesty requires that the contribution of others be
acknowledged. At the undergraduate level such of the work
must involve the consideration of ideas and material
originally conceived or made accessible by others. There
is a significant difference between the use of the
acknowledged restatement of such ideas and materials after
intelligent assimilation, and the unacknowledged literal
reproduction of them. The University Ins
ists
on
intellectual honesty in scholarship.
Intellectual dishonesty may take many for, -_
such as verbatim and unauthorized copying of the works of
others, fraudulent obtaining of desired laboratory results,
the use of commercially prepared essays as a substitute
for one's Own work, the submission of the same essay or
other work to more than one instructor for credit without
due explanation or prior approval, unauthorized use of
material in examinations or tests, impersonation of another
student at an examination, misrepresentat
ion
of information
or falsification of academic records.
Withoutlimiting the generality of this section, and
dependent upon the seriousness of th
e
Offense, sanctions
imposed for various academic offenses may range from a
simple warning on .a minor first offense, to reimposition
of the
.
work assigned, to failure on the particular
assignment or fully on the course, through to denial of
admission or readmission Or to suspension (or
expulsion) from the University for repeated flagrant
offenses or for a single serious offense.
The University insists on scholarly integrity from
all its members and emphasizes that it will impose
appropriate sanctions on thOse who directly or indirectly
contribute to the weakening of this integrity.
Procedures for student appeals in matters of
academic discipline will be applied consistent with section
31(8) of the Universities' Act.

Back to top