1. Page 1
    2. Page 2
    3. Page 3
    4. Page 4
    5. Page 5
    6. Page 6
    7. Page 7
    8. Page 8

 
SiMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
?
S.
,
cc-1o9
MEMORANDUM
To
?
Senate ?
From,
Office of the Dean ... of Graduate Studies.
Subject ......
Graduate. Curd ciitum Changes. .. ..Master.....Date...........JulY......4. .1
?
O ?
..............
of Arts - Teaching of French Program
MOTION: That Senate approve and recommend approval to the
Board, as set forth in
?
s.80-109 - Graduate Curriculum
Changes in the Master of Arts - Teaching of French Program.
MOTION: That Senate approve and recommend approval to the
Board, as set forth in
?
- new graduate course
proposal, DLLL 603-5
These changes were approved by the Senate Graduate Studies Committee
on July 14, 1980.
Bryan P. Beirne
Dean of Graduate Studies
mm/
attachs.
0

 
SiMON FRASER
0
MEMORANDU
Mf
KNY,
14-3:1980 .
I
- ?
j ?
JATE
4-i
To ...... Bryan P. Beirne
?
..
?
Chairman
Dean of ?
........
.
1
?
Faculty
?
Arts Gradiate •3'• Committee
CURRICULUM CHANGES: Master of Arts -
Subect.
?
9$."'.................
Date.
MY. .9.,. ?
.....................................
At its meeting of
8
May, 1980, the Faculty of Arts Graduate Studies
Committee approved the attached modifications to the degree requirements of
the Master of Arts Teaching of French Program. The Committee also agreed to
recommend to you that the changes be in effect so as to govern students
entering the program for the first time in 80-2. Naturally, these students
would have the option of choosing to be subject to the requirements of the
current calendar. Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
tALJ
W. L. Cleveland
?
[ft
WLC/md ?
MAY ill
113S)
Attachment ?
RGIST ?
• ..
W ?
c.c. H. Evans Registrar
?
.
I
B. Bartlett, D.L.L.L.
?
MAIL UE-IJK
N. Lincoln, D.L.L.L.
R. DeArmond, D.L.L.L.
These changes were approved by the Executive Committee, Senate Graduate Studies
Committee at their meeting on June 16, 1980.
0

 
Proposed calendar change: Master of Arts - Teaching of French Program
Delete:
Procts
Project 1
(5)
to be
carried
out between the Ant and second sessions.
These projects - set up individually - will deal with the study and dooumenta-
tion of the ptublems related to the behavlo Of the lazigua.. learner., An outline
of the project must be submitted by December 15 and the definitive project
must be submitted by the following June 1
Project
II
(5) to be carried out between the second and thfrd sessions.
These projects will be directed at the practical problems encountered In the pte-
paration of classroom material and óvaluitloà procedures. The seme tula
tions apply u for Project I.
(
p.
98 - 1979/80 Graduate Calendar)
Substitute:
Project (5)
Graduation from the program requires the completion of a
project dealing with a theoretical, experimental, evaluative
or practical aspect of the teaching of French as a second
language.
Students should attempt to select and delimit a project
topic before arriving for the second Summer Semester.
Topics most be approved by the supervisory committee.
Before the project is undertaken, students must submit for
approval a fully developed outline..and bibliography. Work
on the project is undertaken between the second and third
sessions. In the third session, time will be provided for
what should be final work on the project and for detailed
discussion, where required.
Students can realistically expect to complete the project
requirements (as per General Regulations) no later than
April following the third and final session and thereby to
graduate at the first Spring Convocation following
completion of the course work.
Add (immediately after above)
DLLL 603 (5) - Reading course
At the end of the first Summer Session, students will be
furnished with a reading list which they should have
completed by the beginning of the third Summer Session.
This reading course will be evaluated on a satisfactory/
unsatisfactory basis by written_inatton
in
the
third Summer Session. The examination may not be
taken more than twice. Students will register for
the course concurrently with DLLL 602.
Approved: M.A. -Teaching of French Cttee. March 5, 1980
DLLL Graduate Studies Committee. March 13, 1980

 
2
Justification of above Deletion, Substitution and Addition.
1. ?
Deletion
The deadlines for the planning, execution and submission
of the projects have proved to be impractical. This is due to the
fact that:
1)
students in this program are all full-time teachers
who, upon their return to school in the fall, are far too busy to be
giving time to meeting the deadline for outlines,
2)
after only one session in the program, students are
still ill-prepared to undertake a project,
3)
any such projects undertaken generally require
substantial reworking by the student in the light of knowledge. and
experience gained in the subsequent sessions of the program.
In practice, few of the students succeed in delimiting a
topic, submitting an outline and starting work on even the first of
the
,
two' projects before the third year of the program.
The requirement of two projects proves to be unduly
onerous for both the student and the supervisory committee. Thus,
• ?
students undertake the projects either between summer sessions or
after completion of all three summer sessions, i.e. always in off-
campus (on leave) status, while working full-time, and while dispersed
virtually across Canada. This means that the on-going supervision is
maintained, for the most part, only by mail (with, where possible, the
occasional visit by some of the students to campus). Working under
such conditions on their first project, students tend to become
frustrated and discouraged, particularly by the inevitable hiatuses
in communication; the realization that they must undertake yet another
project under similar circumstances-'frequently leads to the abandonment
of both projects (and consequently to the loss of their and the
supervisory committee's work on the first) and, of course, to a failure
to graduate even after the successful completion of three years' course-
work.
On the basis of these arguments, we request the proposed
deletion.
2. Substitution
Para. 1 - self-explanatory
Para. 2 - Experience of four cycles of the program shows
that this timing is more realistic. The approval of topic, outline and
research bibliography ensures that the work undertaken in on-leave
status is well-founded. Supervision of drafts of the projects will
continue as before. Providing time for work on the projects in the
third session will ensure that the final details that are so difficult
is
?
will
write about in a letter can be thoroughly discussed so that students
will be in a position to prepare the final manuscript form.

 
3
Para. 3 - Experience again shows that only such a
statement honestly reflects a reasonable and achievable completion
date for graduation. It is therefore important if only in terms of
'fair advertising'.
On the basis of these arguments, we request the proposed
substitution.
3. Addition
Practical justification
1)
This M.A. program must maintain a total of 40 credits.
Hence the 5 credits assigned to this course.
2)
The proposed entry is designed to ensure that students
who are full-time teachers are fully aware, right from the start of
the program, of this requirement and that they will have time to
a) obtain the books, and b) organize their study of them.
Academic justification
It is believed that the proposed reading list will provide
a broad context and setting for the course-work (and the readings
required for each course) and that it will therefore furnish the basis
for an even greater coherence of the total program.
The readings have been selected to cover three major
areas: a) an historical view of second-language teaching developments
in the twentieth century with particular emphasis on b) the
philosophical and psychological foundations of the audiolinguãl method
(almost exclusively the method used in B.C. schools) and on the
aüdiolingual method; c) a selection of current views and developments
emerging in opposition to both a) and b).
The restricted reading list lends itself to a final
written exam. To a certain extent - given the coherence of the total
program and the timing of the examination - the exam will inevitably
act, in some degree, as a comprehensive exam without, however, this
being its principal purpose.
On the basis of these practical and academic arguments,
we request the proposed addition.
S

 
..
SIMON
FRASER
UNIVERSITY
New Graduate Course Pro
p osal
Form
CALENDAR INFORMATION:
Department:
Languages, Literatures and Lin
g uistics
Course
N umber :
DLLL 603
Title:
Reading Course
?
-
Description:
A reading course covering_ the broad categories of audiolingual
audiovisual and other diverse SL teaching philosophies.
Credit Hours:
?
5 ?
Vector:
?
Prerequisite(s) if an":
fli_I_
601
, 602
.
ENROLLMENT
ANDSCHEDULING:
Estimated Enrollment. 20
mm.
?
When
will
the course first be
offered:
1982
How
often will the course be offered:
as
p
art of each
_M.A._
Teaching _of_French
program.
JUSTIFICATION:
see attachment,
p.
3.
RESOURCES:
Which
Faculty member will normally teach the course:
?
nil
What
are the budgetary implications of mountin
g
the course:
nil
Are there sufficient Library resources (a
pp
end details):
yes
Appended: a) Outline of the Course
b)
An indication of the comDetnce of the Faculty member to
give
the course.
c)
Library resources
Approved: Departmental Graduate Studies
C
o
mm
ittee: ?
'
Date:
March13,l20
Faculty
IA&A
-
^
m
/
Date:
?
Date:
Faculty
Senate Graduate Studies Committee:—
Sena te ?
_

 
DLLL 603 (5) Reading Course
?
Outline:
The assigned readings have been selected to cover three
major areas: a) an historical view of second-language teaching
developments in the twentieth century, with particular emphasis on:
b)
the philosophical and psychological foundations of
the audiolingual method and of the audiovisual method, and
c)
a selection of. current views, trends and developments
emerging in opposition to both a) and b).
Bibliography:
Besse, H., 1974.
uSignes
iconiques, signes linguistiques", in
Langue francaise, 24, December.
Brooks, Nelson, 1964. Language and Language Learning. Harcourt,
Brace and Jovanovich.
Diller, Karl C., 1978. The Language Teaching Controversy, Newbury
House.
Girard, Denis, 1972. "Mthodes directes et méthodes audio-visuelles",
in R.
Filipovic.
Filipovic,
R. (editor), 1972. Active methods and modern aids in the
teaching of foreing languages, Oxford University Press.
Mackey, William
F.,
1965. Language Teaching Analysis, Longmans.
Mirand, S., 1974.
?
"'AUdio-visuel intégré' et coniunications(s)".,
in Langue francaise, 24, December.
Montani, Kiara. "Les procédés didacticques en fonction des étapes
successives dans l'apprentissage des langues vivantes",
in R.
Filipovic.
Porquier, R. and R. Vives, 1974. "Sur quatre méthodes audio-
visuelles, essai d'analyse critique", in Langues francaise,
24, December.
Reboullet, Andre, 1973. L'enseignement de la civilisation francaise,
Hachette, Paris.
Rivers, Wilga M., 1964. The Psychologist and the Language Teacher,
University of Chicago Press.
Roullet, E., 1979. Theories grammaticales: description et
enseignement des langues. Nathan, Paris.
Savignon, Sandra J., 1972. Communicative competence: an experiment
in foreign-language teaching. The Center for Curriculum
Development, Inc.
Taggart, G., 1974. "L'utilisation de l'image dans les exercices
structuraux", in Langue francaise, 24, December.
Titone, Renzo, 1968. Teaching foreign languages - an historical
sketch. Georgetown University Press.
Wilkins, David A., 1976. Notional syllabuses: a taxonomy and its
relevance to foreign language curriculum development,
Oxford University Press.
0

 
Competence of Faculty to give course
Not a consideration.
The M.A. - Teaching of French Committee will be responsible
for setting and evaluating the final written examination.
Library resources
Most of the books are currently available in the Library
with at least one copy.
A series of journal articles will be provided in photo-
copy form.
All published books in print will be ordered through the
bookstore for purchase by students.
Library copies will hopefully be available through the
Telebook service.
.
/7

Back to top