1. Page 1
    2. Page 2
    3. Page 3
    4. Page 4
    5. Page 5
    6. Page 6
    7. Page 7
    8. Page 8
    9. Page 9
    10. Page 10
    11. Page 11
    12. Page 12
    13. Page 13
    14. Page 14
    15. Page 15
    16. Page 16
    17. Page 17
    18. Page 18
    19. Page 19
    20. Page 20
    21. Page 21
    22. Page 22
    23. Page 23
    24. Page 24
    25. Page 25
    26. Page 26
    27. Page 27
    28. Page 28
    29. Page 29
    30. Page 30
    31. Page 31
    32. Page 32
    33. Page 33
    34. Page 34
    35. Page 35
    36. Page 36
    37. Page 37
    38. Page 38
    39. Page 39
    40. Page 40
    41. Page 41
    42. Page 42
    43. Page 43
    44. Page 44
    45. Page 45
    46. Page 46
    47. Page 47
    48. Page 48
    49. Page 49
    50. Page 50
    51. Page 51
    52. Page 52
    53. Page 53
    54. Page 54
    55. Page 55
    56. Page 56
    57. Page 57
    58. Page 58
    59. Page 59
    60. Page 60
    61. Page 61
    62. Page 62
    63. Page 63
    64. Page 64
    65. Page 65
    66. Page 66
    67. Page 67
    68. Page 68
    69. Page 69
    70. Page 70
    71. Page 71
    72. Page 72
    73. Page 73
    74. Page 74
    75. Page 75
    76. Page 76
    77. Page 77
    78. Page 78
    79. Page 79
    80. Page 80
    81. Page 81
    82. Page 82
    83. Page 83
    84. Page 84

 
SiMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
MEMORANDUM
?
5
1
I
RW
-
'S
STE
Subject
?
PROPOSED PH.D. PROGRAM IN
CR1 MINOLOGY
From... ?
. ?
ON ACADEMIC PLANNING
?
SENATE GRADUATE STUDIES COMMITTEE
Date...
?
.
Action undertaken by the Senate Committee on Academic Planning at its meeting
of November 7, 1984 and by the Senate Graduate Studies Committee at its
meeting of October 15, 1984 gives rise to the following motion:
MOTION:
"That Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board
of Governors, as set forth in S.84-80 , the proposed
Ph.D. Program in Criminology."
is
04

 
SiMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
MEMORANDUM
I
To......
?
MK
L ............-. ..
Senate Committee on Academic
..............................................
Subjed.9P9
?
.
?
•441• •
9LQ
From
.........M.
?
...............................
Dean of Graduate Studies
Date ......
October 16
?
198.
.............
Attached is the proposed Ph.D. Programme in Crimology. This programme
was approved by the Senate Graduate Studies Committee at their meeting
on October 15, 1984.
mm/

 
S
GS. 84. 14
SiMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
?
MEMORANDUM
T 0
.......
efl
4. ?
S.tuLiea .Cmm.ittee
?
.
?
From .......
?r1an
.
?
.
Ristxa.'s ...
............................
Subject.. ?929c. Ph.1. •
?
p
.
ga .
ti
.
n.
zixp.10
?
Date ........
.
Qct.Qbr. 3,. .1.98.4
.........................
The attached proposed Ph.D. Programme in Criminology was approved
by the Assessment Committee for New Graduate Programmes at their
meeting on September 24, 1984.
mm!
0
n

 
rAUG $ 1984
DEAN OF
G
RADUATE
I
LSTUDIES OFFICEJ
SI,1 )N
\C
DI P\H rI-I DI C ifIH
July 31, 1984
Dr. John Webster,
Dean, Graduate Studies
Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, B.C.
V5A 1S6
Dear Dr. Webster:
Attached please find the revised proposal for the Ph.D.
(Criminology) program. These revisions result from a review of
the recommendations offered by the etTna1 assessors.
We found these assessments to be quite positive with
?
regard to our original proposal. Most of the recommendations do
not reflect on the proposal itself but are recommendations and
cautions related to administration and longer term development.
Of those which do bear on the substance of the proposal,
we have only rewritten our proposal to include the recommendation
made by two assessors (Friel and Doob) that the comprehensive
examination in Research Methods be made mandatory for all students.
We have also added one faculty member to the list of those eligible
to teach the research methods courses (Burns).
A number of other helpful suggestions and cautions were
raised by the assessors. Some of these reflect an orientation to
advanced graduate studies in Criminology which is unique to the
academic context within which the assessor works and which is
not the orientation we have chosen (American vs. European models,
etc.) . A number of suggestions warrant consideration by our
department as the program unfolds and should be acknowledged
here:
1) Expanding the number and diversity of doctoral
courses over time (Friel)
The requirement for on-going curriculum revision has
been acknowledged by our department and wiU include
• ?
deliberate attention to course evaluations and
curriculum review - as with the M.A. program.
.........

 
Dr. John Webster
?
- 2 -
?
July 31, 1984
?
.
2)
Provision of overview course (Friel)
This has been considered by the department. However,
it is our opinion that the organization of the new
core curriculum makes this unnecessary.
3)
Students demonstrate minimal proficiency with
statistical software packages (Friel).
The orientation of our research methods sequence
allows for this and it is hoped we can improve our
offerings in this area over time as resources are
available.
4)
Oral comprehensive examination (Friel)
We agree that this might be a useful idea and will
review this possibility "as the Department gains
experience" with the program.
5)
Library resources (Burns)
A library search has been completed and resources are
sufficient. The library report apparently was not
included in the package which went to the assessors
but has been reviewed by the Senate Graduate Studies
Committee.
6)
Direct admission with B.A. (Doob, Trepanier).
We agree with most of the cautions expressed here.
However, our screening and review process (identified
in the proposal) should be sufficient to limit such
admissions appropriately.
7)
Course duplication (M.A., Ph.D. - Trepanier).
The course requirements stipulated for a Ph.D. student
who enters with an M.A. in Criminology from S.F.U.
(or elsewhere) has been organized in a way which avoids
this problem. No student who has taken a course for
an M.A. will be allowed to take it again for a Ph.D.
8)
Size of program (Doob).
We agree with this concern and acknowledge it in our
proposal (p.7) . For the foreseeable future, the program
will limit the numbers admitted to approximately the
size of our current "Special Arrangements" population (6-8)
/........
.

 
Dr. John Webster
? - ?
- 2 -
?
July 31, 1984.
9) Number of credits required for those admitted without
an
M.A.
in Criminology (Trepanier).
We do not recommend any change to our minimum course
requirements forthose entering without an
M.A.
in
Criminology. The only
M.A.
(Criminology) program we
can make direct comparison with in terms of "lesser"
or "greater" requirements is our own. Using the
"preparatory"/"regular" distinction of Dr. Trepanier,
it can be seen that a student without an
M.A.
(Criminology)
is required to complete a minimum number of preparatory
courses greater than is required of our own
M.A.
students. Cónséquèntly, we feel that the weight of
coursework is approximately the same regardless of
status on entry. Further, our proposal indicates
that the requirements can be increased or decreased
depending on the courses taken or the discipline(s)
involved in any individual's graduate background.
These are our comments and recommendations resulting from
the work of the external assessors. We have found their input most
helpful and positive.
We recommend that this proposal now proceed to the next
level of decisionmaking.
U-QJ.4.
Duncan Chappell, Chairman,
Department of Criminology
jCommittee.
John W. Ekstedt, Chairman,
Criminology Graduate Program
att.
.
ams
0

 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Ph.D. Program Proposal - Department of Criminology .....1
Introduction ...........................................
Justification .........................................2
Admission Requirements ................................10
Degree Requirements ..................................11
Supervision of Candidate's Work ......................14
ComprehensiveExaminations ...........................14
Thesis Development ...................................15
[1
1

 
Ii
I. Ph.D. Program Proposal - Department of Criminology
Introduction
The Department of Criminology requests approval to add a
Ph. D. Program in Criminology to its current Graduate Program
offerings. This proposal to implement a Ph.D. program is
presented as a second phase in the plan of the Department of
Criminology to revise its Graduate Program curriculum and expand
its offerings. This plan involves three discrete phases as
follows:
1.
The revision of the curriculum of the current M.A. program;
2.
The presentation of a proposal to add a Ph.D. in
Criminology; and,
3.
The presentation of a proposal to add a Masters degree in
Criminal Justice Administration.
The Senate Committee on Academic Planning provided approval
in principle for this plan in meetings heldon October 6th and
December 8th, 1982. The first phase of the Plan (revision of the
M.A. curriculum) is now completed and has received final
approval from Senate (July 11th, 1983), and the Board of
Governors (August 2, 1983). The M.A. program is now offered on
the basis of the revised curriculum (beginning Fall, 1983 - see
Appendix A).
.
1

 
As explained in previous submissions, part of the purpose
in revising the M.A. curriculum was to establish a
core-curriculum base which would not only give integrity to the
M.A. Program but also provide the curriculum base for the
eventual introduction of the Ph.D. and Masters Degree in
Criminal Justice Administration programs. The approval and
implementation of the core-curriculum establishes the ground for
proceeding with the Ph.D. Program proposal.
It will be necessary to add one course (Crim. 899 Ph.D.
Thesis) to the core curriculum for purposes of the Ph.D.
program.
Justification-
Concentrated planning to revise the Graduate Program in the
Department of Criminology began late in 1979. As part of this
planning process three studies were undertaken. These studies
are identified as follows:
1.
Market Survey - Proposed Masters Degree in Criminal Justice
Administration (completed May 1980);
2.
Survey of Graduate Programs in criminology and/or Criminal
Justice existing in Canadian, American and British
universities (submitted as
.
a Report to the Department of
Criminology, May 1981); and,
3.
Enrollment and Employment Projections: A Study Concerning
the Proposed M.A. (Crim.) Applied and Ph.D. (Crim.) Programs
.
2

 
at Simon Fraser University (submitted to the Department of
Criminology July 1982).
The studies submitted in' May 1981 and July 1982 are the most
pertinent for purposes of this proposal. On the basis of these
studies and the undergraduate and graduate programs currently
being offered, it has been concluded that a Ph.D. Program in
Criminology would be an important addition to the Department's
current program offerings and clearly meet the criteria for
program assessment developed by the Senate Committee on Academic
Planning. This is further reinforced through our experience with
special arrangement Ph.D.. candidates of which there are
currently
six
enrolled (see Appendix 'B' for summary information
on these students).
r
L
Our studies indicate there is a market for students
graduating with a Ph.D. in Criminology and that the enrollment
potential is sufficient to warrant the introduction of such a
program.
In 1981, 43 educational institutions (colleges,
universities and training centres) and 83 criminal justice
agencies in Canada were surveyed with regard to their support of
candidates for a Ph.D. in Criminology and their potential for
employment of persons successfully completing such a program. Of
the 64 respondents selected for analysis, 35% indicated they
would provide release time for employees to attend a Ph.D.
program in Criminology and 15% indicated that financial
assistance would be available. Additionally, it was determined
3

 
that, ?
in
1981,
28 positions were available across Canada
for
persons
with a
Ph.D. in Criminology and that an average
of 19
possible positions for Ph.D. (Crim.) graduates would be
available each year for the next five years. (Enrollment and
Employment Projections, p.31).
A review of universities in the U.S. offering Ph.D.'s in
Criminology or Criminal Justice indicates that, in 1981-82,
approximately 25 Ph.D.'s were awarded. The number of persons
awarded a doctorate in another discipline with a concentration
in Criminology is not known. No survey of employment
opportunities in the United States was undertaken. No English
language Ph.D. (Crim.) program exists in Canada. (see Appendix
'C' for summary of employment opportunities for Ph.D. (Crim.)
candidates in Canada).
?
.
The majority of persons making enquiry to the Department of
Criminology with regard to candidacy for a Ph.D. in Criminology
(currently by special arrangements) have been employed within a
criminal justice agency. While this may change with the
introduction of a formal Ph.D. program, all our surveys indicate
a growing trend for persons already employed in criminal justice
agencies to seek to advance their academic credentials and a
growing willingness on the part of the agencies to support such
an interest. For example, 39% of our currently enrolled M.A.
(Crim.) students are employed in a criminal justice career
program. It is anticipated that the trend for such persons to
seek admission to graduate studies in criminology will continue.
4

 
The following comments address the criteria for program
assessment as developed by the Senate Committee on Academic
Planning:
1. The program has intrinsic academic excellence and is?
something this University can expect to do well.
As indicated above, considerable work has been undertaken to
ensure that the Department has in place a curriculum
structure
which
promotes academic excellence and which can
provide the framework within which advanced graduate studies
can take place. Additionally, the degree of national and
international recognition which the Department of
Criminology has achieved in a relatively short time gives
evidence of its ability to provide programs which are
theoretically sound and well implemented.
For example, the Department has established two centres
for advanced research: the Criminology Research Centre
(1978) and the Institute for Studies in Criminal Justice
Policy (1980). The Annual Reports of these centres indicate
that, since their inception, 12 faculty and 25 graduate
students have been involved in 33 research and policy
studies supported by $1,362,034 in grants and contracts.
These centres are members of the Association of Criminology
Research Centres in Caadá and the United States and
participate regularly in meetings of the Directors of
Criminology Research Centres (Canada). For additional
information on faculty research grants and contracts, see
0

 
a ?
S
Appendix D.
As well, the Department is attracting increasing
numbers of graduate students applying from other locations
in Canada and elsewhere in the world. Many of these students
apply on recommendation of the universities where they-have
completed their undergraduate studies or with the support of
criminal justice agencies with which they are associated.
For additional information on M.A. (Crim.,) students, see
Appendix E.
2.
3.
Program substantially enriches the existing teaching
programs at this University.
The addition of a Ph.D. Program is viewed as a logical
extension of the existing Graduate Program in the Department
of Criminology. The Department has now reached an adequate
S.
size in terms of its ability to offer comprehensive
supervision to advanced graduate students. This program will
be the only one of its kind in Canada and, as a result,
should provide the opportunity for the admission of
candidates demonstrating high standards of excellence. These
students will enhance the capability of the University to
contribute to the state of the art in criminological
research and education through participation in advanced
research projects and contributions to the teaching program
within the Department of Criminology.
The Program builds upon the existing programs and resources
in the University.
6

 
This program is based on the current B.A. and M.A. programs
0 ?
in the Department of Criminology and the resources currently
available within the Department or the University. No
additional resources are requested. Admissions will be
limited and carefully monitored to assure that program
requirements do not exceed the capacity of departmental
resources. The bulk of the coursework requirements for Ph.D.
students is already provided through the M.A. core
curriculum.
Six
Ph.D. candidates are currently being
supervised under special arrangements. This workload appears
to be within the capability of existing rsources. However,
for the foreseeable future, admissions would be maintained
at or near this level.
As illustrated earlier in this proposal, the surveys
undertaken by the Department of Criminology indicate that a
national need exists for persons with graduate and
post-graduate education in the field of criminology. This
need occurs at two levels: 1) on the part of criminal
justice agencies; and 2) on the part of universities,
community colleges, and other educational institutions. This
department has considerable experience with the problems
created by increasing applications for missions coupled
with the difficulty in locating and employing qualified
faculty.
While there are two English language doctoral programs
in Canada which provide opportunity for persons obtaining a
IT
7

 
degree in a
related
field to pursue
a criminological topic
of research
interest
(University of
Alberta and University
of Toronto), there is no English language criminology
specific Ph.D. program currently available.
The University of Alberta program is the closest in
location to Simon Fraser University and deserves further
comment. This program offers a concentration in Criminology
for Ph.D. candidates in sociology. In 1982-83, six students
were enrolled in this concentration and one student
graduated. These students find employment with universities
in Canada and the U.S. and with government services in
Canada. In the university setting these students are likely
to locate in departments of sociology as well as
criminology.
There is a French language criminology-specific Ph.D.
program offered at the School of Criminology, University of
Montreal. In 1983, five students were enrolled in this
program. Approximately twenty students have graduated with a
Ph.D. (Crim.) since this program was initiated in 1964.
Graduates tend to find employment within universities with
the majority at the University of Montreal or other
locations in eastern Canada. Some graduates have been
employed by the federal and Quebec governments. The program
has also received international students most of whom return
to their country of origin on completion.
.
8

 
An assessment of provincial and national needs in this
field presently and for the forseeable future indicates that
these needs are not .being met. The proposal to establish a
Ph.D. (Crim.) at Sinon Fraser University has already
attracted strong student interest. Seven of 26 M.A. (Crim.)
students surveyed in 1982 indicated a preference to pursue a
Ph.D. (Crim.) degree if offered (Enrollment and Employment
Projects, p.11). Nine requests for information relative to
obtaining a Ph.D. (Crim.) have been received by the
Department since January, 1983.
4.
?
The Program does not unnecessarily duplicate existing
programs at other universities in the Province.
Neither the Universityof British Columbia nor the
University of Victoria offer programs in the field of
criminology.
5. ?
The excellence of the Program attracts students to the
University.
The Criminology Department has attracted excellent students
to its current graduate program both from other provinces in
Canada and from other countries. It has also managed to
attract some of the best SFU undergraduates in criminology
to its M.A. program (see Appendix E). The current enrollment
of the M.A. program numbers 63 with approximately' 18
enrolled from other provinces and 10 enrolled from other
countries. The Department currently has
six
Ph. D. students
admitted under special arrangements (see Appendix B) and is
.
.'
9

 
receiving an increasing number of requests for admission at
the Ph.D. level.
Admission Requirements
The minimum University requirements for admission to a
doctoral program are provided in the general regulations
(Graduate Program) Section 1.3.3. Direct, admission to the Ph.D.
Program in Criminology may be approved for persons applying with
a Masters Degree in Criminology, a Masters Degree in a
discipline other than Criminology, and, under exceptional
circumstances, with a Bachelor's Degree' in Criminology provided
an accumulative grade point average of at least 3.5 has been
maintained.
?
0
Applicants will be expected to write a Graduate Records
examination prior to admission (general aptitude). Applicants
are advised to contact the Department of Criminology to
determine the specific requirements for writing this
examination.
All applicants are required to submit a statement of
research interest and at least two examples of previous academic
work.
.
10

 
Degree Requirements
1. Masters Degree in Criminology. A Person admitted with a
Masters Degree in Criminology must successfully complete
approved courses amounting to a total of at least 15
semester hour credits. Course requirements will be met as
follows:
a. two specialty courses selected from the Graduate Program
core curriculum
(Six
credit hours); and
b.
three additional courses (which may include Directed
Readings) approved by the Senior Supervisor (nine credit
hours).
2. Masters Degree in a: discipline other than Criminology.
?
Persons admitted with a Masters Degree in a discipline other
than Criminology must successfuly complete approved courses
amounting to a total of at least 29 semester hour credits.
The course distribution is as follows:
a.
four core courses, including the Research Methods
course, selected from the Graduate Program core
curriculum (17 credit hours);
b.
two specialty courses selected from the Graduate Program
core curriculum:(six dredit hours); and
C.
two additional courses (which may include Directed
Readings) approied by the student's Senior Supervisor
(six
credit hours).
Because of the number of disciplines which are allied to
11

 
Criminology, the Graduate Program Committee may determine
that courses have been taken in the applicant's Masters
Program which are equivalent to courses required in the
Criminology core curriculum. The Graduate Program Committee
may waive up to 14 semester credit hours of course
requirements on determining that equivalent courses have
been taken at the graduate level.
3. B.A. in Criminology. Under exceptional circumstances,
persons with a B.A. in Criminology may be admitted to the
Ph.D. program. This may be possible for students who have
demonstrated capacity for original research at the
undergraduate level, maintained a 3.5 or better G.P.A., and
are recommended for direct entry by at least two members of
the faculty
of the Department of Criminology eligible to
teach or supervise in the Ph.D.
?
(Crim.) program. Applicants
who meet the G.P.A. requirements and who have demonstrated
research ability through field experience in criminal
justice may also be considered on recommendation of at least
two faculty members involved in the program. Persons
admitted in this category are subject to a review of their
status no later than the end of the second semester
following admission. Through this review, the Graduate
Program Committee will determine the ability of the
candidate to complete the Ph.D. Program by direct entry. The
student will either be confirmed as an approved candidate
for the Ph.D. in Criminology or directed to seek admission
12

 
to the M.A. Program. Students admitted in this category must
successfully complet approved courses amounting to a total
of at least 29
semester
hour credits. The course
distribution is as fllows:
a.
four core courseé,. including the Research Methods
course, selected from the Graduate Program core
curriculum (17 cedit hours);
b. two specialty corses selected from the Graduate Program
core curriculum six credit hours); and
C.
two additional curses (which may include Directed
Readings) approvd by the Senior Supervisor
(six
credit
hours).
A maximum of nine smester credit hours of course work may
be taken in another department or at another university on
W
?
approval of the student' Supervisory Committee and the Graduate
Program Committee. Thesecourses maybe accepted as partially
meeting the requirements for any courses, other than core
courses, in the Ph.D. Prgram.
All students will b required to write comprehensive
examinations in three of the five core areas of the Graduate
Program core curriculum.The core areas are: Criminological
Theory; Phenomena of Crime; Criminal Justice Policy Analysis;
Law and Social Control; and, Research Methods. All students are
required to write the comprehensive examination in Research
Methods.
13

 
Each student will be required to complete and defend an
original thesis.
Supervision of Candidate's Work
Prior to admission, it will be determined that sufficient
faculty and resource support are available to accommodate the
needs of the applicant. And, in consultation with the graduate
student and faculty, the Graduate Program Committee will appoint
a faculty supervisor who will assume responsibility for. the
candidate's program of study. This
perspn
will counsel the
student regarding course work and the selection of a Supervisory
Committee. By the end of the first semester of residence, the
faculty supervisor will recommend a Supervisory Committee to the
?
•k.
Graduate Program Committee for approval. The Supervisory
Committee will normally consist of at least three members, two
of whom must be from the Department of Criminology at Simon
Fraser University.
Comprehensive Examinations
Comprehensive examinations will be set in each of the five
core areas of the Graduate Program core-curriculum and approved
by the Graduate Program Committee. Each candidate is required to
write the comprehensive examination in Research Methods and in
two of the remaining four core areas.
14

 
The breadth of content offered within the core curriculum
does not allow for concentration in each core area. Core areas
for comprehensive examination, other than Research Methods, will
be selected on the basis, of the candidate's chosen area of
specialization and research interest. The Supervisory Committee
in consultation with the student will determine the core areas
to be selected and submit them as a recommendation to the
Graduate Program Committee for approval. Comprehensives will
normally be written by the end of the fourth semester of
residence and no later than the sixth semester of residence.
Comprehensive examinations which are not successfully completed
may be retaken once. Comprehensive exams not successfully
completed must be rewritten at the time of the next regularly
scheduled sitting. The administration and review of
comprehensive examinations will be the responsibility of the
Graduate Program Committee.
Thesis Development
Each candidate isrequired to develop a prospectus for a
thesis based on original research in the semester following that
in which the comprehensive examinations have been passed. The
prospectus will define the proposed investigation and
demonstrate the relati9nship between it and existing
scholarship. The prospectus is presented to the Supervisory
Committee for approval. On approval by the Supervisory
15

 
Committee, the thesis
proposal
shall be circulated to faculty
and resident graduate
students
and presented at a departmental
colloquium.
The completed thesis will be defended in oral examination
by an examining committee constituted under the provisions of
the General Regulations (Graduate Programs) Section 1.9.3.
LI
.
16

 
Calendar Entry
Ph.D. Program
Admission
The minimum University requirements for admission
to the Doctoral Program are provided in the general
regulations Graduate Program Section 1.3.3.
Direct admission to the Ph.D. Program in Criminology
may be approved for persons applying with a Masters
Degree in Criminology, a Masters Degree in a discipline
other than Criminology, and, under exceptional
circumstances, with a Bachelor's Degree in Criminology
provided that a'i accumulative grade point average of
at least 3.5 ha been maintained.
Applicants will be expected to write a Graduate
Records Examination (GRE) prior to admission
(general aptitude)..
All applicants are required to submit a statement of
research interests and at least two examples of previous
academic work.

 
Degree Requirements
Candidates for a Ph.D.
the following requirements.;
LI
(Criminology) must complete
1. ?
A person admitted with a Masters degree in Criminology
must successfully complete approved courses amounting
to a total of at least 15 semester hour credits.
Course requirements to be met as follows;
a) two specialty courses selected from the Graduate
Program core curriculum (six credit hours); and
' S
b) three-additional courses (which may include Directed
Readings) approved by the Senior Supervisor (nine
credit hours).
2.
?
A person admitted with a Masters Degree in a discipline
other than Criminology must successfully complete
approved courses amounting to a total of at least 29
semester hour credits. Course requirements to be met
as follows:
a)
four core courses, including the Research Methods
course, selected from the Graduate Program core
curriculum (17 credit hours);
b)
two specialty courses selected from the Graduate
Program core curriculum (six credit hours); and
c)
two additional courses (which may include Directed
Readings) approved by the student's Senior
Supervisor (six credit hours).
Because of the number of disciplines which are allied
to Criminology, the Graduate Program Committee
reserves the right to determine which equivalent
courses have been taken in the applicant's Masters
Program. The Graduate Program Committee may waive
up to 14 semester credit hours of course requirements
on determining that equivalent courses have been taken
at the graduate level.
3. ?
Under exceptional circumstances, persons with a B.A.
in Criminology may be admitted to the Ph.D. program.
This may be possible for students who meet the
general University regulations for entry with a
B.A.., who have demonstrated a capacity for original
research at the undergraduate level, and are
recommended for direct entry by at least two members
of the Faculty of the Criminology Department eligible
to teach or supervise in the Ph.D. (Criminology)
program.

 
.2
Applicants who meet the G.P.A. requirement and who
have demonstrated research ability through field
experience in crimin al justice may also be considered
on recommendation of at least two faculty members
involved in the program.
Persons admitted in this category are subject to a
review of their status no later than the end of the
second semester following admission. Through this
review, the Graduate Program Committee will determine
the ability of the candidate to complete the Ph.D.
program by direct entry. The student will either
be confirmed as an approved candidate for the Ph.D.
in 'Criminology or directed to seek admission to the
Masters Program. Students admitted in this category
must successfully complete approved courses amounting
to a total of at least 29 semester hour credits.
Course requirements to be met are as follows:
a)
Four core courses, including the Research Methods
course, selected from the Graduate Program core
curriculum (17 credit hours);
b)
two specialty courses selected from the Graduate
Program core curriculum (six credit hours); and
c)
two additional courses (which may include Directed
Readings) approved by the Senior Supervisor (six
credit hours).
A maximum of nine semester credit hours of course
work may be taken in another department or at another university
on approval of the student's Supervisory Committee and the
Graduate Program Committee. These courses may be accepted as
partially meeting the requirements for any courses, other than
core courses, in the Ph.D. program.
All students will be required to write comprehensive
examinations in three of the five core areas of the Graduate
Program core curriculum. All students are required to write
the comprehensive examination in Research Methods.
Each student will be required to complete and
defend an original thesis.
Dissertation Procedures
Each candidate is required to develop a prospectus
for a thesis based on original research in the semester
following that in which the comprehensive examinations have
• ?
been passed. The prospectus will define the proposed
investigation and demonstrate the relationship between it and
existing scholarship. The prospectus ft presented to the

 
.3
Supervisory Committee for approval. On approval by
the Supervisory Committee, the thesis proposal shall
be circulated to faculty and resident graduate
students and presented at a departmental colloquium.
The completed thesis will be defended in oral
examination tT an examining committee constituted
under the prjwisions of the Generar Regulations
(Grauate Pi/ograrns) section 1.9.3.
6+N4 -

 
I.
DATE SENT_________________
.1984-85 copy
1
SFU CALENDAR
1985-86
CR,ii,
FJoLO
G- y'
?
DEPARTMENT
DEGREES OFFERED
The Department of Criminology offers a graduate program leading to
a degree of Master of Arts in Criminology.
M.A.
(Criminoiogy),j..
?
-
J
Areas of Study and Research
The graduate program in Criminology concentrates on advanced
academic study and has a strong research emphasia. The bro5d goal of
--
the program is to prepare students for careers in the teaching of crimi-
nology, in criminological research and In policy-making in criminal (us-
lice.
The emphasis of the graduate program is to fosters spirit of enquiry
and creative endeavour among the students, to develop their critical
i
and analytical capabilities. and to train them in the various techniques
of criminological research.
The graduate program focuses,
at
present, on five major
areas.
Other areas maybe added later. The five areas are:
1. ThePh.nomsnonof Crime
=
a) Epidemiological
?
studies, ?
ecological ?
studies, ?
victimization
• ?
.j
studies, etc.
• ?
bI In-depth study of specific types, such as economic crimes,
commercial crimes, organized crime. etc.
2.
Criminological Theory ?
-
a) Foundations of theory-formation in criminology.
b) Validation of the dfferent criminological theories.
I
3. Criminal Justice Policy Analysis
Innovations in
a)
?
the criminal justice system.
bI Social policy and criminal law reform.
ci Recent developments in crime prevention.
V
d) Diversion from the criminal system.
, Criminological Research
• ?
-
• ?
b)
el Evaluation
Operations
research,
research.
prediction research.
C) Action research.
5. Law and Social Control
Criminology Research Centre
(See
page 288)
Institute for Studies In Criminal Justice Policy
I
(Sea page 28sl
Admission
Students holding a baccalaureate or the equivalent from a recog-
nised Institution must meet the general admission requirements for
graduate studies
(Sea
Sections 1.3.2. and 1.3.8 of the General Regale-
V
lions).
All applicants
are
required to forward official copies of their tran.
scripts and to send a short statement of interests. This statement should
include a description of previous employment, research or other work
relevant to the candidate's proposed graduate studies. In all cakes, let-
ters of recommendation from people who know the candidates and are
familiar with his/her work will be required.
Students will normally be expected to write a Graduate Records
Examination IGRE) prior to admission.
• ?
.1
Applications for the test may be obtained by writing to: G.R.E. Edu-
cational Testing Service. Box 955, Princeton. New Jersey 08540.
V
Deadlines for completed applications are as follows:
V ?
V
For entrance commencing FALL semester —May 31
Applicants will be informed Immediately thereafter..
Suöndsory Committee'
Following enrolment by the student In the Department. • Supervi-
Committee
sory ?
will be formed, which shall have the responsibility for
determining, in consultation with the student, the projected program of
study, selecting approximate research topics, and ensuring that the can-
didate fulfils all degree requirements. The Committee will consist of
at
V ?
,
least two faculty members from the Criminology Department. Other
faculty, outside the Department who are considered n4cessaryby the
• ?
V ?
-
student and his/her supervisors, may be added to the Committee.
0
?
-

 
S.
-
-I,
CRit1,Jpoc-V
DEPARThEN'r
L
DATE SENF_______
?
SFU CALENDAR
1985-86
1984-85 copy
DEGREE REQUIREMENTS
Candidates for an MA. (Criminology) degree must complete the fol-
lowing requirements:
Thesis Option
I. Take
xtxtinn
a minimum
"I'
of fifteen )15) semester hours of couraework con
.
ii
a) nine (9) hours of core courses Including the research methods
course; and
bI six (S) hours selected from the specialty course offerings.
Non-Thesis
2. Satisfactory
Option
completion and oral defence of an original
MA.
theals.
I. Take
Consisting
a minimum
of:
of twenty-three (23) semester hours of coure,wort
a) seventeen (17) hours of core course, including the research
methods Course; and
b) six (6) hours selected from the
specialty
course offerings.
2. Satisfactory
approved by
completion
the Graduate
of
Program
two (2) extended
Committee.
essays
?
ore project"
A grade of "8" or batter In required In all core courses and s "B" or
better
4
average must be maintained for the program ass whole.
Admission requirements
Will
continue
as
presently constituted, l.ó.
average
applicant,
or
must
equivalent.
haves Bachelor's degree with at least a 3.0 grade point
mined
meet
Program
An
from
extended
one
the
in the
Committee,
same
of
same
the
essay
standards
five
way
is
(5)
defined
It
ass
will
core
of
thesis.
normally
as
excellence
areas
a scholarly
andbe
25
as
approved
paper
.
40
a thesis.
pages
on
by
a
It
the
In
topic
will
length
Graduate
chosen
be exa-and
"A project is defined
ass
theoretical, experimental, evaluative or prac-
tical research design applied to a selected area of criminal justice
P
r
actice. Projects provide the student with an opportunity to teat the
application of criminological theory to
4
programs in practice. Topics
examination
must be approved
will be the
by the
same
Graduate
as
for a thesis,
Program Committee. Project
Setsiactoranc"
The progress of each candidate will be assessed at
-___'....f..
leaslances
?
I
Ph.D. Program
by the Department. A course grade of less than B is not considered
satisfactory at the graduate level An student
?
performs
.
?
y ?
who perorms unsatisfac-
WHY in two or more
(-:
attachment
?
'A'
attachment
'
B'
courses may be dropped from the program.
CRIMINOLOGY GRADUATE COURSES (CRIM)
Denotes a Core Course
CRtM 800-4
?
Criminological Theory
A comprehensive overview of theories in criminology. Lectures, read-
ings and examinations will familiarize students with competing levels of
understanding visa via crime and deviance phenomena. The course will
emophasiza the integration of historical and contemporary theory, and
will trace the impact of Ideology, politics, and social structure on the
emergence of criminological thought. Traditional theories will be en,-
vied through the lens of current perspectives on crime and justice.
CRtM ?
801 . 3 ?
Advanced Criminological Theory
Intensive exposure to the major streams of criminological theory. Semi-
nar topics and readings will highlight the development of thinking
about Crimean a problem In the sociology of knowledge. Emphasis will
be placed on the relationship between Ideas and social forces, as well
as the interplay of theory and practice. Students will be expected to
prepare a major research paper focusing on one theoretical school. It
will be assumed that participants have already acquired a fundamental
background in the elements of criminological theory.
•CRIM
8104 ?
The Phenomena of Crime
Designed for the beginning graduate student, this course covers a wide
variety of topics all of which deal with what we know about the phe'
nomena of crime historically, temporarily and geographically. This
course will look at the patterns of crime and victimization, and will
explore crime patterns at local, provincial, national and international
levels. Known characteristics of offender, and victims will be covered
and characteristics of specific forms of crime will be studied.
CRIM
?
811
.
3 ?
Advanced Topics In Phenomena of Crime
An advanced seminar which will build on what is covered in Crim 810.
Topics covered may include historical criminology, the ecology of
crime, environmental criminology, the media and crime, fear of crime,
victimization, organized crime, or white collar crime.

 
SFU CALENDAR
1985-86 ?
QRPrO
or
A
v*r'
S1T___________________
?
1984-85 copy
r
rI,-1IdI1O(J)c
V ?
DEPARTMENT
SCUS/SENATE change)
.
I
.
0
]
CR1M
8204 ?
Criminal Justice Policy Analysis
An introduction to policy development and policy analysis in the field of
.
criminal justice, including a general review of the function of bureau-
cratic agencies in the public sector and the particular role of govern-
ment ministries providing criminal justice services. Major topic
areas
-
and
include:
inter-governmental
organization theory;
analysis
policy
as
planning
it applies
theory;
to the administration
decision theory;
of
4
justice.
:
CRIM ?
821 . 3 ?
CrImInal JustIce Planning and Program Evaluation
Topics for in-depth analysis will be selected according to the availability
4
and interest of specific course instructors and may be selected from any
area of service delivery In criminal justice, including law enforcement.
the judiciary, Court administration, corrections, or legal services. The
course will provide an overview of the systems approach In criminal
justice planning and relate program evaluation to the major types of
planning initiatives taken within the criminal justice system.
•CRIM 830-4
?
Law and Social Control
This course will offer students the opportunity to examine the social
'
utility of legal Intervention in the Instance of criminal law; the relation.
ship between law and social order; and the process of lawmaking and
the social efficacy of specific criminal sanctions. A wide range of quanti.
tative and qualitative methodologies will be accessed, with study or
legal practice ultimately accountable to theoretical explanations of law
and social order.
CRIM ?
8314 ?
Low and Social Policy
While the overriding concern of the courts will be the Interaction
"•
between law and policy. the context of the discussion ntlglrt be found In
• ?
4 ?
:
such subjects
as
law and mental health, the process of law reform, or
victimless crime. This course supplements the more theoretically on.
f
?
-
?
.
ented content of the core course. Law and Social Control.
CRIM 880
.
5 ?
Research Methods
-.
The course will cover basic research design for criminological problems
and basic techniques for statistical analysis. The research methods coy.
A ?
--
ered will include experimental design and non-experimental designs
more frequently used in criminology. The statistical techniques covered
-
will include contingency table analysis and regression analysis
as
well
as
an overview of more advanced techniques.
CRIM ?
881 .3 ?
Advanced Research Methods
?
I
For the more advanced graduate student, this course Is based on the
knowledge developed In the Introductory course and covers both
parametric and non
.
paramelnlc techniques with an emphasis on
parametric statistical analysis. Analysis of variance, regression analysis,
analysis of covariance, discriminant analysis, and other techniques will
be covered. The approach will be conceptual and will emphasize the
strengths and limitations of the various statistical techniques In crlmi.
nologlcal research.
CRIM
?
882.3 ?
Advanced Topics In Criminological Research
Advanced statistical and non-statistical techniques In criminal justice
research. Special attention will be given to some, or all, of the follow.
log; evaluative research, prediction techniques, systems analysis, cost-
benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis and computer simulation
modelling.
CRIM
?
8704
?
Selected Topics
Concentrated studies in areas of student specialization.
CMM
?
8714
?
DirectedReadlngs
•'
Intensive readings under the supervision of e faculty mamber. In areas
of Interest related 10 student's program.
CM 893
?
Extended Essay I
The llrat of two extended essays required for completion of
MA.
(CrimI-
nology) degres under the non
.
thesla option. The topic to be chosen
from one of the five (S) core areas.
CRIM
?
896 ?
ExtsndsdEss.yN
-
The secondof two extended essays required for Completion of
MA
(Clmlrtolog) degree under the non-thesis optIon. Thetopic to be cho-
-,
?
••
San from oneof the five (5)co,eareas.
CRIM ?
897
?
Project
The project is an alternative to Essays I and It, required for completion
of an
M.A.
(Criminology) degree under the non-thesis option. This
j
project Is defined as a theoretical experimental, evaluatIve or practical
research design applied to
a
selected area of criminal justice practice.
Projects provide the student with an opportunity to teat the application
of criminological theory to programs In practice.
• ?
cRIM ?
59$
?
M.A.Thesla
TJ

 
Ii)
1
3
)
ei
.'
I4j
Iii
H
Li
-
•J
•C)
I
IX
-
U-i
-
?
H
Z
<
'-c)
3
;U
I
•.:'
0
.4
0
Li
)
C)
I ..
3
u_•
.4
!.ii
U)
-
2
-
Z
1)
LI)
U
Vi
!
'-ui
'2
Vi
z
-
-
Li
-
3
0
-
u
Ls..
Li
.3
>
Lld
3
U
LI)
LI)
0
:'
Ui
'i')
\.
IC)
2
-
Vi
>
-
4
Li
LU
LI)
0
-
-Ui
IX
4
>
LJ
5-
-
C.)
I-
C)f
Z
*
>
.*
4
4
rl
2
C)
-
Vi
'
i
u.
3
CX
.4
-
:'-'
i-
0
Z
4
..i
cC)
Z
U)
4
-I
P
?
P-
.J
J
0
4-.
4-.
-
If)
3
LU
Z
cC)
II
Vi
s .C)
if)
Li
-'
cC)
'j
-
•CX
s-
ñ
- tj
I
U
u
C)
J
-
0
Vi
_i
I-
z
.4
Irr)
UO
N,'
''
N
LU
I
?
I..
4
.
Z
Z
-
).
C)i
Vi
C)
-
J
Lii
3
I,
41
X
N 1
sft
I0
s-
-.1
Vi
C)
5
33
U
)
U
coL
4 ?
<1
U
ii
iI)•
lz
,4
..J
a
•..
.5-
IX
-
0
5-
I
i&.
Vi
02
-
-
..J
4
5-4-.
0
3
-2
0
U
5-
C
-
0
in
3
Vi
_I
if)
C)
34
U
5-
4
7
0
U-
.J
C)
U.
'i
04
UI
30
-
-
4
0
X
LU
-
Vi
>
IX
4
0
CX
ui
00
-
Z
IX'
0
U
'4
'5-
C)
?
Z
C)
0
Vi
LU
V.
I
ti
ui
4
-
-
3
C)
443
4
C)
'
43
C)
4
•U.
Cc
-
.3
U
If)
LU
<
43
€4
I-
5-.
5-
'5-
C)
4
.42
5-
H
Li..
V
.J
I-
r
'J
Lii
.4
ci)
U.
-
Z
iJ)
ZI
0
3
.
s-
4
Lii ?
-
U.
)
)
:'
1
Iu.
•'
''
'I
>-
4
(C)V..
C)
lu
1)
-.
(.1)
•,J.4
'ii
,.
'3''
.-1
2
?
'-
)i
.4
j
•)
0
i
C)
1
1
.1
U-
-
CII
i
7
.1
U
.J
s--
•C)
II
C)
1
C)
2
2
C)
>
)-
••)
-4
C)
'
0
'.1)
-
C)
30
0
IX
C)
C)
4
5
0
-
Li
Li
-
/)
Vi
4
)'
...J
C)
.
7
5-
5-
'
if)
2
04
J),
'<,
?
' -1
'0
'
3
-
'3
5
,
4
.4
4
(iS
.4
N
'
2
Li
C)
3
3
)-
.J
t)
-JO
-,
'00
;
_a
-
.J
_)
j
4
5-
2
:
-
'ii
.4
,j
J
>
l
.4
'4
.4
C)
41)
-
I
-'
4-
I
C)
-,
>
Z
Ui
0
X
Ci)
CX' ?
I
N
4
:
-
-
ui
N
-
;'
.J
.'C)
14
-5-..'5_P_
5-I-
I--
22
•C).
XJ
•C)'C)'C)v.C)
33
3'.C)
C)C)
f)I)
,
j)4f)
if)LI)
ti)'f
33
r4
C)C) ?
JC)
.JJ
-i _j -j
•is-
'41) ?
.
C).)
1)"c)
a")
J-
)
J)Li
tD-)
33
33LJ'flOU-U-.c)
C)'
30
'M',)Mt/ifltI)cJtfsJ)L)
•i
3:
?
.
•JtI)U'I)J)U
•C).3
C)3 '•
j
H
-
ID
4
C)
-
1)
C)
- ,)
0
.
-0 ?
1s
N
C)
'0
LI ?
N
C'-
r--.
:
N.
3
.0-.
Ti
)
i)i
0'
?
I')
ti
-
•4
s-
-
S
'-
S
0
S
05-
•'t
:.
0
'N
??
•1
.
0'-
•t
.
N
S ?
?
(Y
S
Cl
-4
'i
--
Li
.\
' ??
>: ?
-.
:
'
.
.-.
-:
•\j
7
:-.
Pb
-
.
Li
'-
IC)
3
4
?
0
0'
-
).
'.i
1
4
-C-
'1
(L
C).
"
r
-
t-.
t-
TO
a
•-'
-
-
-
'1)
) 4
o:C)o
-.D'fl
-3-n
I
t
JT
J)
Jl1)J'fl
.4
'Xl
0
'1)
N
0
4
'S
C)7
".J
'S
C)
0 -.-
.7N
'-.")
5-3ZN
b-C)
-:
ZN
5-
-.
'ZN
-()
7"
fl
C)..3
..J\
j4N
uI:
a.
-
O'
biJ
CL
.J\
?
0
?
?
'ujo
_\
J
:
(C):
-\
o
C)-
<I
)'S
ON
0
4
.
•.
>-N
.Dr'
-j
ON>-u
u
ON>-')
IXN
4LIZN
ZN
44
2N
<'Xl
(ro
ZN
.4
44
ZN
Q..N
<'0
o
o\
to
4.-4
a N'Q
j
N
IXN
IXO
IXN
IXJ)
IXO
cr\
U I
U4)
10
N
0
3-
3
.
L
U
U
U
-V
0
0'
-:4
-J
-J
-t
-.4
I-
f)
U
?
U
4
?
-is
p. -
4
• ?
4--
• ?
C)
?
4
4-
•1
3
) •_)..
I
1)') ?
I
14
1) 4
I
C' ?
)
4 4
C)
Co

 
0
U)
a
z
'
-I ?
4
0
J)
3
a
-J ?
I.
'•- 3
-ul
a
z
3
Li
Li
> ?
- L)
7
3 ?
1j I
Ui
2)
2)
-4
I
t LJ
.3
H
'3
3
•1f)
p. -
7
LI
Ui
I
0
\ ?
I-
a
ILL_i
4-
H
La
>- ?
:2
a
3
?
• ?
1-
.2
0
?
I)
3
0
1.)
4
'-I
a:
4)
LI
.T3
2)
0
1
,.
a
'_i
.a
U
Ui
H
L9
H
-
-
-
-
4
>-
-
La
t1
.J
0
2)
3
4
>
4-
U
3
4
3.
J
..J
II
4
Ui
Z
0
Lr
ir
Z
W
LI
LA_i
0
2)
-,
-
.-
.r
.0
3
It
0
Z
C)
-
fl
I
' ?
'. .1)
'z
a
o
.-
a
0
UJI
a
n
-
.j
-
II
10
.
z
0
u
- II
ti_i
o
a
-
4
LI
-
U)
....
i
4
j
4
a
Ia
Ji.
LI
3
Li
z
LI
cr
U..
P.-
._4
Z
o
x
a
o
ix
a
a
>-
j
Z
2)
Z
L4.
j
.11
1
-
Ui
3
'f
:i
I....
U..
3
H
1
t
)
LI
7
-
4
:
....
a
-
C.
-0
1U
II
'
1)
Ct
7
Cr
()
._.
y
4)
•(
fl
fl1
C)
a
ti_i
'Cr
U4
9
Ui
LI
Li
-
C)
a
u_i
>
Lu
<
>
a
c
•z,
.)
j
.3
uj
a
_)
U_i
a
4
-
I
.j
J)
ii
2)
,-
._i
j
.r
..
'
)I
c
2)
)
•••_
)
C.)
2)
')
iL
2i
:'.
'U
-,
3
4
I_I
q
.J
4
a
LI
4- I
j
z
•r
.
>-
-
>-
-1
I)
Cr
,()
.
<
1)I
'
rI
.1'
17
4
.1)
<
4
C)
-'
a
1)
4-
H
-'
•T
4
I . >
,j
J
-.
.-
Lr
ii
p
',
,
n
m
4
-
.j
Cr
4
0
-,
C)
-)
0
'i
.4
ii.
-
.
s-i
i-
C)
>
U
4-
0
C)
-
:
Ci
•)
2)
I-_ i
'-I
4
-
C)
C
Ui
'I)
1s
0
L
U..
0
Z
4
_.
_
I
4
?
0
u
'-
.3
-.
3
0
>
L.
7
U
3
4
.1)
a
3
3
'I
1
E
'
4
-.
N
J
.1)
.
.
•JJ
p...
.-
-
3
-
,f)
4!
U)
-.
a
-
-
,-
<
L.
4
:J
-
.0
J
>
2)
I)
2)
I>
3
71
2)
U)
in
>
0
Z
C)
-.
:
-
TX
13
I-a
.AJ
.1)
'
7
LA
ii
.J
')I
)
T
I)
-
4
Li
Cl1
fi
1)
L
AJ J
j Ij
I, , ?
Lj
Lj
32)
)
39 i-')
...3
.
• 9
.9'?
••.-
4••4-
<4
7''
'-4-
9)
.
.72 23 02
)
..C.
.J.i
j _JJ
ii .
2)3
44
U)'M .1 U)sI)
L)U
44
V) U)
JJ
4-C
3._i 44
4.3
4
2))
:o3
.33
2)0
T2)
'JU
3.2) 2)3 32)
UL
3D :33
0._I
(35')
U
IV)
._.'
2)-)
fiJJfliPUJ1J1L)fiI)U
)
7
.0
N RI3
CO
C)
?
0 0 0
?
0 •a
o o 01 ?
9
0
I ?
N
.-
-.. ?
fl
C)
?
1) 0
0
?
0
.1
2)
0
.2
?
-i
3
9-'
'
C
0 ?
r.
?
. .4 . ?
.
.4 ?
• .
. ?
• -
. .
?
. .
.4
-
.3
I
a
-.
2)
'1
,)
-'J
'I
'fl
'N
-
-
..,
..-.
-
I ?
•-
'-.
:2
a
70
to
.1)
4
i
I)
0
C'
C'
4
3")
ION
C)- .
O f '-
N
-
O"j
(30
ON
C)-
N
3.)
2)2)
(20
'34-
:YU T
42)
43
<0
40
U_iD
a-
.LJ-
;._I0
jjO
.iJ
.-.
UJJ)
2)..
.i
2)3
.a3
ixN
a'
Lr-
.
.y N
1
4 -0
LyN
-U) 0
1) "j Vs -
'f) 1)
.1 0
U) -
Lb .1'
UI ?
• I
/1 ?
41
.J 'Ti"
I. ?
1
-2)0 1
2)0
ON CD . - .
41'J
'i . - I'.'
41
v N
v I -k
V 3
V ?
i--'
..-
I':-
(-i
i10
'U
LI
L
U
3
.3
.3
3
ii
La
ii
.J
,J
3
u_I
.1
.1

 
0
C)
Z
II
Li
U)
0
.J)
C)
ri
C
"I
a - .
-')
I
CJ
14
-J
7
Li
Li
_Ll
>
7
I-
3
.4
7
Li
.J
>
z
u
7
C)
if)
£
LL
C)
J;
?
4 CL
CL
U.
7
C)
tjJ1
?
I-
4
3
I4-
a-.
3 ?
I- .1)
3 -
Li
4
-,
7
)
U, ?
U..
C)
ii
1
•j
.
I
4
C-C
E
4
U. ?
C)
I
C-)
iu
-
Li.
U.
CD
7
_D, ?
ti
C)
O
-U
C)
>-
L.
_
>
4
.r
'r
?
?
CL
,.
'i
z
j
u
4
Z
0
CL
.4
.J
-x
•,
. ?
1 -
-
L/)
C
.4
I-
>.
•)
D
•j
.1)
C)
) ?
)
U
LI
.3
.1)
• 1
u
'-
t
I'
•1
.-.
-1
.1
)
-
,-
..i
-
4:1
. ?
•)
••)
)
.4
C)
?
u
Si
Lii
Li)
Li
1
LI)
D
.L
••:
j ?
•j
.
-
C)
Oj
. x •
j ?
••)
7
7
Li
--
r
> ?
Li
a
?
.
5/
•\.
'
>
3,
f-
7,
Li
z
.1)
)
•_•)
f_I
'
.) ?
L/
j
J -
J
LI
Li
LI i
1
Li
r ?
•-
•L;:'
i
t
r ?
•, :.T
7
Li)
••);.'•)
.
- ?
/
'•I.-'
.)
'Cl ?
)
:t
LI
Cl
?
JA.
lfl 'I ?
•:).:),.)n
j1ff,'f.)flf)C)
)
."
)
..) C)
C)
?
3
C) ?
)
U)
?
IN
C) -
-
-
1) ?
N -
a
.\.
-
M
-
') ?
-
:-u
•cj
• ?
• ?
:
.-
•4
-J
CL
CL
• i
-
?
CL
')l
t'fli
1')
06
0
4
t
t ?
:)
.1)
4
N
N
N
N
'.'
-.
-:
4,
•L)
43
)
.D
.3,
LL
-N
-4
P
-N
-
-
'-N
.4
P-
'-N
?
•i
-
-N
? U-..\
u..\
-
U.N
-
IL\
.,
?
•I)
4'fl
4)
40
40
4 ....
•i••-
:0
0.
.LT'\j
Ii..
IL
L
U..
IL
LI..
Li
U
C)
I
4
p -i
Li
CL
r
3
Li
LU
I'-
.:
Z
x
-
-
u
ti
cr
CL
.4
S
IL)
Iii
Z
LI
LI
7!
C)
I
•Z
0
4
II
U)
Li
C)
'-I
-
If)
CL
-
U).
Li
.)
iZ
Li
P
3
Lii
.r
)
ci.
-
C)
11)
(/
LI
-4
-
•J)
Lt
'I
Z
C)
2
u_I
_.Ji
Li
.l
LI..
U..
>
Li
Li
C)
a
u
....i
-
U)
o
I-
iii
Z
2
U
Z
z
Qi
Li
L
2
4
U)
-
<
-
LLJ
C)
Z
Li
>7
0
Z
4
...
-
U
>-
Li
-
CL
7
C)
0'
-
I-
if)
3
I
U)
C)
4
Li
C)
LI
1j
I)
LI
il)
Ci.
4
I-
.4
CL
Lu...
0
03
Li
-
CL
Dl
Ui
U)
4
1.
IP-
2
'l-J
C)
>
7
Lii
-
0
U
'C)
.')
Li
C)
A)
Li
Ii
I.x
IL)
Ci.)
3
4
CL
.4
'a-
(
C)
Y
4
>
LII
.
LI
I
-
Li
Li
z
-
Si
a.
4
4
.-.
IL
r,1
•x
-..
>
/J ?
1
i
)
•J
i_i
1J
:/)
'1
C)
7
-
J
l
Cl
1
4
Ui
1
ii
I
Li
.4
IL
-
7,
ii..
1'
1
J
fl
-
rr ?
I
t
Li
I
>
I
'.-
C)
I-
7
7
_.j
o
?
1
C)
C)
U
C)
C)
C-i
.3
C)
C)
-
Z
>
.4 ?
?
I
I
.3
/\i
•:
a
)•
'a-
.
Oi
C-)
,J)
.L
'3
'I
1.I
)
-
4
3
'-
--.
•.1
Liii
3
*
C)
Li
-
-u
CL
.r
£
7
>
.3
CL
'-
.1
-
4
ti
<I
Li
ti
i
Li
Li uI
3J
.ULJ
I
CL.I
.
)U)
I,J3
_j _j
_j _j
C)C)
.3_i
£ C
33
S)-..,)
HZ)
C)
-'3
3 ?
r/)
.i
1)1
fl
a
NP--
3'.-
*4
I
U)
(/
.
C)
?
I
N
3
3
),
?
0
- ?
a
If) ?
NI
ID
:C)
-I
'-S
I) ?
4
.3
U)
.3
1
I
1
4
o
o
H
i
.1)
4
N
'US)
Li
N
I)-
N
£4
N
\
•to
\
:c
N
Ti-
N
t-O
I/IC)
•.)-.
U3
LIC)
.J3
.33
C-JO 1LJ3
>
.3
.%
.4
.J
)-\
33
jJ.4S
.3-i
I/IN
U)\
Aja-
tJN
j-
I/IN
i.io
U)"
ii-
I.I)N
4 Oj 4-.
31-
c)3 00
00 0fl
00
0-s
ala
CL
CL
CL

 
11
__________
..
$uJ.
1
'X
0
-'
,
I-
x
-
U.
'JI
i
.
• •;z
z
• ?
-••)• 1
.0
' 0
;
•?<
Ui-1;
04
UJ
.
ç
dN
I
a
"4'
I
Z
Li..
4
.•
-)
,"4-
1z
)1h
2
Z
JJ
>
-J
z
o
-
_a
,>
:.4x
i;z
i
0
t'i
".
z
.
-'
4
Z
-...
iii
k
tJ)
4
I
o
Z
>
-
.4
z
.
'-
I
J0•Z
.'-'
0
1
.
z
o
'''
0
44,
v
uj
a
0
lo
Z
U.)
U
j
-
q
cx -
" 4
4
4
z
4
;1.ttic-
;
0
.
o:.
.4.
_,
?
. a
(.
In
iu
u.i
Lb
N
-
fjo
LU
>
U
t
Ui ?
.
,'D'
Q
I
)
a)
4
In
.
Cl:
o
'•
a
a
a
.
>
0
U.
'..
<
th
V
.
-
..
-
a
ix
t- "4
.0,.UJ
LU
Z.•
:. >.
tO
-
i.ii
k -:. '
.
'In.
.
NHo
ui
U
LU.-o-
rz
x
a
a
,:
•i
-'-
.
jIn
.
oz
iP'
z
L 141
a
Z
u.s
I
a
U.)
a
.4
L
In
£1 ?
':
>
4I)
.
( 'k4
I
. ?
U
ix-..w
'
ix
.4
...a
'4
0
.4
..,
z•-.s
i.oz
,
A Un
Z
u.s
p
.4
C
-
I- I
4
'
J
.4 4.
I-
tfl-
.4
4
I
-
I ?
IZ
.
fl
x
tu
1-
• 4
'•'
/)
tfl.'3.
In In
Ln j)
-z
i
u.s
-u.s
.In
X
4
<
U.
Lii
D
.7
0
IL.
"
r
j'J
iI1
')
.4
.-
4
, ?
,
.J
0
4
-4
LU
-
-
4
-
.
0
4
.J
i
U
2 '
1-
I
7
t
J
.J
0
4
J J
D
4-
o.
-'
:' z
j
!*-
.j
'i;
0
-ix
Li
-
a
i.
4
0
n
.•
ii..
-J
?
.
0
Z
0
0 ?
4/)
-
.4
tfi
'A
U)
'Z)
LL
4
JAJ
.>
'.-t
Z
ix
• 4
>
-
0
0
-
...a
.
-
a
U
U
N
C
-.
..i•.'
-.t
a
*',-u)
•>
.4
cx
-
J)
<
.
>'''.'
i
4
Q•
0L't-
-
?
.
-'O,-4
U'
'.4
0
Tn
ix
D
z
4
r
(1)
r
.1
o
-
.
LIJ
in
.........
•.1•' ?
- z
tj.J
j'.
.
.L) 41
'-' U
ju.j
0
00
"1 -1
..,,Lj
II
I7
Y1
b-I- 0
al
a.
z
z
0: -1 -..s
-
.4400 .4.j ..J .
J.14'4/tJ)
i
.1
Li.j
- DJ
14
t.4
•bQ
'Jj
)L9nLI)V
00
In'
'.1)
QCD
LflInU
0
00
1)Z
naU'fl'm
U4I/)InLr
t
I'f
Ln
'u'.
••,;
:i
-.
,
z
z
z
U)
%4::
4\J
.
O
0 ?
.
ff
.40
..
0
0
tOO
0
ifl
' '0 0
N -- -
-o
0
• 0
?
0 . ?
.
r
0
-
.
?
- •'
,'..
4.
'
,
•4
.
0
• .4
4
N
?
.
N
?
0 .
tfltj
()
Tn
-
-'U U
In
.1
..'
4
-iLULU
LU
.J .J
-
-
.
i
. ?
•,, ,
06.,•
I
ii'i
06
a
Z
o
ff
Z
,
oTno- .
-2
o
0.
a
0.
a
'S
U)
'S
U)
'S-.•]'
'
CO
\
U)
\
U)
4
.
)
I
-)CO
4)
.4
4
14
ZU)
.I'O
ta)
I'
'
-
.
'
• ?
'•\
Z
I\
,.
• ?
-
U)'\
' (JO
.4fl'S'
In"Q
.(J
)
(JO
/)\
(JO
- 0
- bo
- o
j.
o
LU
/)\
¼)
-' N
a
a'
. .
'a' . .
d\
00
%UU)
0('J
5.)r r )
fu
: Q
0'J
'Lii
LL)I)
0-4
LUO
on
V cc
4 C
VO'
Z
cx.
4
cx
-ix
cr
(I)
'14
In
LU
&U.'
UJO
II
-
>
>
>
>
:-
I

 
4 - fl
?
C)
co
fa
co
C)
'-I
C
-H
'H
co
C)
-H
r1
4:1)
.3
0
U)
'I
C',,
co
r44
bD
(3)
I
Al
a)
U
()
(I'
C1)'0
• ?
4-'a)
CC
4
..
o
•.O(
>
WO
S.-
S-Gju
.0
4-3 ?
CO
4-'C9--'
C)
La
V)
C .4)
C 4)
4- J
?
10
to
C(I)
J
4-' 'o c
(0
0)
?
-
C 0 -
(0 0 C
L) 0- 0
0—
c c:
• 4-' U
- C 0
4)
r
iU)
4)3
0
C
-4 ?
4)
3()
4
0
Q)
3Q)
0
•HU)
U) +j
4.).4
.3)!)
4.)
?
?
4--1
?
r-A
HQ)
?
4
3)
4j4) ?
•Q
Q
H
33 ?
.4)
4)41)G)4
3C
Cd
41)4:1)
n.0 C
4)
C
r4
.-.) ?
C
4.)
4:)
cd
-H
UC)
c
C4..4
ct
-H
.
3 4-,
p
C
92
4
(I)?
4-ct
••
41) ?
.H
U) If)
90-
9-4 3-H
cc
4.) Q
C 3-H -H
-'-4 ?
U) 0
4) U)C -
4)
E o -
C
0}
.0
•0
f0
4.)
-r-
-C>)
C4-'
(V .
.-
L)u
-a)
C) >
I'.
H
.QJ
a).
U
C
l_uC
?
+-''Va
4.
U)
'V ?
-
C)
4•S4
) ?
S...
-CO ..
ftFs.'
•,
I
-•
'f-
(V
L)0-Q
o.--
.1. .
• 5- 0
c ?
- ?
..-
••
4:•
c. ?
•-
U IV
'0)
(
N U
• 4• •
U
.CCO
;: 4—
'V
•,.- ?
C
•,
1fl
?
.
.1
'-4
c.3
flPC •
J4•
. rH
•) ?
-
c: ?
) -H
(.
14)
• ?
'H
•.Q_
w
0
P)
wo,44q
{
1
.r
i
..HC
V3'--E
,
FQ)4
-r1
4c3
-' 4-'
?
4)
-•i
-4r1
.
4C
ca P4 0
04-'
30Q.3
G)-H4-
1w:
-H
Cd
WW
'cx:1
;h •
___
4
4
11
c:
C")
cc
0)
to
.4
th4
C
0
z
C
4:1)
4:))
Li
C
U
0
—I
4)
U)
a)
-1
3
• .:' ?
:i)
I.!)
1
U)
(P
41)
41)
•c4
I)
.1
U)
00
r1
-.3
H
F.
?
C
4-4
03
.2
U
U)
r-4
'-4
z
Eli
C")
cc
0)
C
-H
F.,
4-'
.j1
(3
—4
--1
0r4
?
041)
?
3
C
0--
4)0
c •H
Q rH 4-)
H
a.

 
LI ?
I
1$
(Z
o
r)•.-
Cr.'
I - ,
(I
(fly—
CO
S-:
L)
C
.
C)
UV)
.
Li . .' ?
•.
.•••.
.•.
'.'
OL:
.C,•..-
:
I ?
Oi
I ?
-,
:
-
4-
. ' ?
.L.
C)
?
..'
--:
.
C)-
-4.-'O
-'o:
Jr-
_+f 4-4
W
•X ?
U)
C
?
-J) ?
C:
..l.:)..
.
i-.',U)ç.
_4.
.4 ?
Q
4..-,.
'T-.I•.:':
-,u.-
I
?
'.
?
4!:
Ui
.
4..)
I-I ?
.
L.
PH
C)
!.
!
4...)
cj
(.4
0
-C
I-)
-J
U
"-I
U)
C)
-1
414
II)
C,
S..
•-
() ?
.
-
CI(D
(.) ?
..'
':
?
•-
-,--
C)
-"4=
.-.• ?
..'
----'•l•-
S..
-
?
._
. C)
'U
?
F
"4
•-
?
(')
>'.
-u
4:-i ?
C
L
4.
?
4...)
'4)
I
C)S-
4-) ?
>
U'C
c.
-
c_ ?
D
Cl-
4. ' ,')-) ?
4))
. ?
S.,
ri
- ?
j
?
•-
4... ?
j
-.- ?
' ?
.-'
?
c
C) ?
"•.:
;-4
?
.-) ?
L 4
•j
?
,
: ?
-
?
n
-i ?
:
C)
0C'.J)
cC
--. ?
4..!
?
fl
Q')
r-4 ?
(1)
?
,
-. r
?
0
4.'
.'C.z'Hr.,
o ?
'_ ?
cJ •-
••
- ?
c.
- ?
t(.)
?
i) ?
Q
'-U ?
.-
c
P
-.
C)
Oc,
?
,
-'CO U)
-4
?
-,r'4
.
(j ?
ç ?
-.
'-'
I)
?
?
'4
'.Cf)
J.)
4..,
?
?
.-..' ?
'
?
fl
)
'I ?
(1>d
aoZ ?
-
'J..
c
0 4-)
4.
Q)
.I) ?
ci
0
.; C) ?
LD rt 41
.: ?
i
?
-c
C)OON
(fl.4
•.ç
..
C)...)
C ?
4).'r4
C)E,c
c,).'-,
•HJ)
4-) 4.) ()
,'i ?
4-)
.L-flbC
L4j,.,.
c--
4-'Q)
'U).p
CI
P(OCj) )'l):4
, Q
: ?
C) U
?
-( ,-i
C)
S-i
I
4.,
4.
o
Q)-
- v.l
()L1
C
to (1)
?
41)
.- ?
, m r.n .:1
D
4p
W
?
..
C
.,..
Q)
r L) CL J
?
:4) ?
.?
U)4J
(p
-1,
-
If
. ' -4 "
?
L4
-
4..':
c'C)
?
c:.'..c:
0
0-ir-4
4..'
U, ?
•'
-4
C)
C;)
I-i
(I)
to
--
r'1
4-4
CI
'Il
1!
1
1
-
C)
. ?
-.
.)
4-'
.
c1.
•i--'--:
I.i
V . i
;VD#
(1)
• ci
•.
cq
co
r.
'-4
•I-l4
c
c'
(I)
0)
ç
r--4
0,--'
-
i-I
cd
ro
•':.
Q .
9
.
4_
Cl)
I-I
r-4
4."-.
a)
C)
S.,
I

 
•0
IL
U.
LI.
LU
12
4141
u
4141
$J4J
•41
41.41
I '
C
.l
II
4I
I'-'
41.41
co
4144
)..
8
Z
4n
(04
L)0
—4
I
I
in
$
$4
II-
zt
I)
V
z
0.-
I
I
0.-
W
2.
0.-I
P.
04..
on
m
V
z
o
0
'la
0
41
'
in
0
0
z
z
z
z
z
I
.
I
V
0
41
41
41
0
0
41
44
0
41
41
.41
QII
Q.Q
.0
0
0
41
V
§
04
044.1
I
I
I
I
I
1$
C
I
V
41
o
z
4$
0
z
41
41
4.1
o
z..
4'
0
z
4.1
0
z
44
o
$41
0
S
'I
:
S
.41
0
co
"I
0
2-
8
-
Co
o
e
o
o
x
10
ol
ul
'-4
_) ?
0
H
.14
4.1
cc
.41.-I
•••
. 0 ?
$4
o•
V.
0
.00
0g
.l)5
'0
0
'0
1
I,
°444J4
-
0
2
U.
Im
-
.
-
-4
-4
-
El
[II
.
4
2
01
)
I
IL
.
'
ool
4
C
-
- ?
4
'
-

 
^A
ED
.1 .
I..
.4 ?
44
I ?
44
UI ?
In
C 0.
.4
I44
?
1..
44 -
£ ?
v ?
e ?
-
?
4
'4 >. ?
(I,
VI ?
§4.IN
co ?
'4U5Q
44 ?
'4
?
(W4.4
0.+0
U)
4.'
-4
VI
o
?
-
-4 ?
44 U) UI
UI ?
C
U ?
I
44)
0.0
4W ?
(44 ?
1.,_4._4V'
05 ?
014 ?
14
?
640
4444
..
44
-4
U
.
9
V.0
?
4) ?
4,
4J44
40044 ?
.V41 ?
4.'
14i
?
000D
.6
U)
O (4i14
?
4) ?
0
?
C 04) ?
N ?
co ?
auoo
0 u V
-
all
I
?
-
g ?
V
34,
UI
?
0.-v
4)
?
.44 ?
VI
-4
0441
Ce ?
.
?
UI
?
I,
?
0W
v) ?
-
UI ?
Us.' ?
0
1 . 4 g 44
?
01.
QUO
4W
?
...4
?
V,.4UI
U
?
Id ?
VI •
?
UI0'4
?
4,04)
U ?
_m1_ ?
44a4,4.'
?
-
1.40 ?
4
?
Cca
4.4(4
UI
?
?
UI ?
4C ?
UU
00
on
0 ?
Z
?
UUUI
?
)4)
• g4; ?
;L.;
4.40 ?
4W
4) ?
2
?
•• ?
'4-4•4V4 ?
4)
$40
"l>. ?
10
as
tA ?
0
?
00
U) ?
UIU
?
.C4.' '4
?
(41.4
-4 -0
..4(I)
Iola
N 40
.44
4 ?
•UIi
U)
ON1!
?
UI ?
.440
ad
U UU
?
VI-
?
- ? 1g•
U)
$4
4400 ?
.;>. ?
N ?
V
•...
I I
?
V)) ?
I 4.'>.
00 •
?
Ø.4
?
.i.4•UI.O
?
4)
?
00 ?
44(40
. ?
IL
UI.-, ?
• ?
'
4
00I ?
oo
44 %4
r
0-5
-
?
I 44> ?
UIU
?
01.
.4400 ?
0 44)-I ?
C
-c ? _
- ?
4 U) I 0.
?
N ?
N N U)...4 ?
N (.4
4
-A
14
044)0 ?
NO
04)
V:.
44
'44 ?
4W-
>.. 10 ?
0
0
?
0>.
4.40
.4441.144
4,
0
?
I'
4)044 ?
N
?
UI ?
(4I.1
V
o
l
'
U0
.0
$4 UI.4 ?
-4
0
-I
?
. ?
.L.
.44
?
.4)
(4
$4 -.
?
-
4)
.44 ?
•440 ?
• ?
.% ?
-444
I' ?
0
4W 0 ?
• Ill .44
?
(44 ?
(44 ?
4W
?
44
0>. ?
'4 ?
44
?
0 UI
?
$4
- ?
(40.4 ?
41
?
VI
?
4,0
440 ?
4444
go.
•.
--
41140
wo
• q ?
5.44 ?
VI
N ?
..4(404440 ?
0
044 -
iz
I
?
> ?
>

 
4.'
4..
(I
4.'
N
$4
Se
II.'
0.
I.
0
4.'
4.'
I
$4
0
I
4.'
U
I
0
I.
4.'
I
I
U
I.'
0
4.'
I I
.
.
th
N
Ii
II
-1
m
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
a
•ip
vc
I
$4
Se
4.'
I
-
$4
a.
N
E
in
MOe
.
z
-
-
-
I ?
>

 
..
VI
.1
-I
0
4)
z
'.4
0
VI
ii
VI
I
VI
04
VI
0
VI
S.
4)
S
I
0
o
VI
VI
I.
N
VI
I
4)
.4
I
I
14
U
4)
.4
.4
VI
0
0
j
VI
.4
.4
V
VI
VI
V
..4
0
U
N
N
•4
4)
4)
4)
4.4
4)
4)
4)
4)
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
4.4
VI
II
4)
VI
E
4.
m
III
vi
.4
VI
VI
14
&
.4VI
4)
VI
VI
4)
a
I.VI
'.1
5.
I.
O
4)
4)
0
I
.4
0
4)
4-'
4)
4..
VI
VI
I.
WI
4)
VI
VI
4,
4,
VI
in
I.
140
tri
5.
4,4.)
4)
cli
I..
I
S.
&
I
Ln
N
N
N
'C
0
-
U-
I
In
11
.4
L
14)0
I.
LU
.
V

 
j
!W
a
1
bd
2
0.4
2
.4
44
VIZ
'44
$4
o
-
pq 44
2k
UI
-
444
o
44
44
0
IA.
14k
VI
O
U
04
w 03
vi a
U
do
(44
14
$4
4.10
-4
44(44
4
4444
c
.44
W
Zj
4-.
I
41
VI
41
4.4
V
0
.44
-
44.
0
'I
44
I
44
41
V
41
44
44
1
$444
.
0
U
)•.
44
)..
$4
4-I
..
44
44
h
U
'4
VI
u
U.
U.
-
U.
440
the ?
'I
to
-4Q44
-4
-g
VI
$4
4)
44
41
VI
I)
44
-
US$1
V
4-4
VI
vi
'4
I)
$44)
-
0
U)
IA
$1
VI
0
ac
.5
•W4'44
4..
0
-
. -O
.40w
#41
.4444
VI
4..
14
44
.44
44
44414
VI
0.
..4
WI
H
O
44
44
44
b 44
•4 ?
4)
.5
ou:
'4
VI
in
1
044
in 0
S.
(44
e
$444
4444
k
-
•1
044
44
'44
cc:
WI
U.
?
•..4
(.
cc
0
4'
-4
x
C

 
.
I
I
?
.
S.
V
-j
1)
4)
0
•0
4.
I
I
4)
4.)
41
4.)
0
-
I
-
V
o
.4)
V
z
0
.4)
4.4
V
4)
4)
4)
1.4)
V ?
41
-
-
d
V
.
lo
w
i
.:.
V
V
j
-
V
'44
VI
0
1..
'-4
.4)
-
..3
.4)
U)
Z
0
.4)
U)
4.)
V
U
'.4
8'
.4)
C
4..)
0
U
V
-
.4)
V
V
1)
4)
U
..4U
.
4-)
.4)
V
.4)
V
'44
.04
V
4..
'.4 I)
V
'.4
4)
.4
-.
-
•.
-V
4.)
4.)
-
C
0
-
0
-V
.4-
0
.4
4)
4)4.)
4)
4)
4)4)
V
VOSU
V
V
V
.4)1
0
1)
m
0
4)
4.1
'.4
.
C
--4
Q
.4
'."
C
lz 4A
9
1.
-
I>

 
('I
4)
4)
' .4
g
U
4)
U
1
L
•i
i
00
4)4.'
.0
4)
4)
U
4)4)
Ua
4)
4)
04)
-44)
4)44
14cfl
U.
S
14
4)
•0
4,
U
-
8
4J
I)
4)
4 ,
4)
4-'
-
U)
0
4.,
cc
z
-.4
U
0
4.'
4)
ii
0
0
ca
-
0
4)
(3
14.
•0
4)
U
14
I0
U
'4)
4)
U
4)
'4
4.'
0
4-'
1
-
.4'
1.40
0
4
o
4)
4)4)
4-'
4,
4)
14
0
VD
-
(3
1.'
•8
.
41
4)4'
0
4)4)
-
144'
L.
-.4
4-'
I
o
uu
fl
&
Om
.;
ci)
4)
U)
4)
4)
r
g
H
-
I-'
0
'
4)4-'
010
4)•
0
4v
4.1
.
uI1 ?
4-'
:kc
.0
•0
04)
•0
4)4.'
0•
4-' ?
-
.-.m
- ?
4)
U
".4
14
•-4
•M
•0
..40
§.UI.I ?
0
4J ?
0
-4
p-I
4.'
0
0-.4
4)
4.,
0
z
z
Z4.'
4)4, ?
..4
S
-
ad
.
I,
U)

 
N
-
!p
-'
Cl
2•J
CL
-4
LI.
00
-
4..
VI
44
U
-4
V
-
V
.4!
.4
VI
.4
VI
0VI4
I
VI
;•
VI
4+4
VI
VI
in
-4
U
44
1.
-00
.
C
.
I
4.4
00
0.
VI
°
a
in
4.4
0IflC
4.4 N
-4
U
VI
0
?
VI..4
--4
o
0.44
VI
4
_l -
'0
4+4
-
IL
4.'.i4
-
V
VI
-4
• ?
'
-
*
-•9 -
-4
- • 4
44
in ?
VI
U
0.
-I Lain
I
I
$00
I..
g
0.0.
40.0
z
--
?
J.
V
iV
3i
--
VI I. ?
...4
V
-40
.
*0
.4
U
a
co
­
4401.
1
0.
Ik0
VI
0
E 1U2
g
lU
0.
?
4I!U0.
.'4N..4U
..44 Ii
?
VI
ca ?
cc
U
4'
4.4
4 ?
0
4 ?
U
U
0
I.
VI
1.
V
V
VI
4'
VI
).
VI
VI
VI
V
V
0
1 0
w
!
rc ?
1I4.4
VI
?
g..4
V-4O
'0
0-o
4in4+4i
I.
*4.4'0
?
Ill
I ?
4.0
0 ?
?
0i
4..
FA
'0
VI ?
4-0
1.0
$1 -.4
VI ?
*44
VIE,
.inOV4.
UII400OQ
0.ICUMo
41
V
u
41
- ?
$4'
'0
?
I
.14 -M
I.
VVIC- ?
•J
I
?
Q. ?
4 (0 U
p
$
?
_VI0
- V
-
41
4'
V
0
?
..i..4in
-
41
-
I
?
-
$+40
?
-4
- ?
.4+400
4.4..4$OI..4
VI4'4'U ?
'MOM
V00
VI,0•
k0...I ?
VIOl.
4.4 ?
U
VO4.IQvI
N
0.-.-
-I-0(0$-g
00.
Ic
ix
U.
X
(I)
-
I
4.4
?
I
-

 
L1
DO
-
044-
4)
4)
c
.44
U)
144)4)
V
U)
14
1444
G)
U)
g
.44
4)0
..4l4.l
I
U..
0.
o
14
?
4)
o
41
U
I)
4)
4)0gw
4)
14
V.44
44
14 ?
4.1
4)
14044>
?
00
4.1
4)
-
€4-.-.
-.4
4444144)
44
.4
U
14E
I
4)4)14..4
I
14
1444
0
4.4U
V)
-'
4)
444414-4
>
-A
>
U
S
U
0.0
14
V
144
-.4
144
.,.4
g
-g
144.1
0
4)
0)
444)
UI)
- . 4
U)
U)
4.14.1
4)4.11414.4
-44.144
._€
.44
44
co4.1
41
4
V
..
4)
4)
44
4)IU)V
?
:14
44
4)
44
4)
U) .44
a
4)
Z
0
Z
0
0 ?
U'-'-..
.V
V
a
V
€40
44
4)
•0
4)
.
DI
(d
1.
.4)
14
00
I.
•0
14
44
4)
?
.
.
?
0
14
•0
4.1
14
4)
.1
4.1
4)
444)
4.1
4)
. ?
•0
1..
0
Ll
0
4
.04)
co
4
C
to
3 ?
4)
C))14
VU)
U)U)
U)
U))..
04
11.1
4)
44
ba
4J
4)4)
4)
41
4)444)44
- M
4.1
0)
4)
44.444)4.1
0)
U
0.
144)
.4444
.44
4J
4.1
-
4.1
-'-Z
44)4
4)
U)
144(n
0)14
0)
--I
I
V
U
4)
U
U.
044
0
-44)
U)
U)
€44
4)
U)
U)
4)
.44
U)
140
. ?
II)
4
bOO
4) .
€44
I
444)
4.1
c
44)14
4)4)
44
4.1
4)
4)
4)0.
0
c
V
(014
oc
-4444
44
144)
14
14
(4
14
44>
>4)
4.4.44
.44
0)
44.4
0
0
V
,0
44(0
(fl
0
44
04)
04)
0>
.44
44
40
0
(4 ?
E
U)
44) ?
•(0
4)
Cd
I).
co
441)
14
444)
I
.00
444)
4)44
3
4)4)
V.0
(44)
0)
0.
B
0100)
(44)4)
>
rz
44
44
0.
--414
>4)
0
U
'0044
4)4.4
og
og
4)0.
S. ?
4)
.44
4)
.44
00
14
4)
U
?
.
4)
1..
14
1414
044
1414
4)41
0.
440
140
4.4
4..
14
-4EU)
440.
.0
g
4)
4)
14(4
140
04)
4)44
.
U
4)
.0
4)4)
1.
40
14U)
•.-4
WI
4)
--4
0.
4.4
.44U)
0) 4)
1444
4)
144)14
?
DO
14
VU)
4)
44 14 .0
.44-44
.4 4.1 ).
g
U)
4)
-
ZO
z
0 a
1.
W. U
4)0.0
U)
<
a
-)
o
u
LL.
X
U)
.
U)
44
17-^

 
I.
-4
4)
14
0.
U)
)4.
0
V
0.
0
4)
-4
(4
(4
g
4)
-
0
0)
44
-
4J
•04
0
VI
-
440
V
K
V
ml.
VI
I.
-40
0
0.4
-4
VI
as-
01
4_4
V
g
g.
-444
00
(44
1)
4)
K
V
-to
4)4)
4.4
4)
4.44)
_
44
0
V)u
*
0
.44-4
0
(44
0
.44
00
OX
0..
.44
lI
•*4.4
00)
0
-4
4)
0
4
..
40K
-v
144)
0)
14
VI
0
V
04,
0
444)
(4
(414
...4
.44
.44
00
0.
•'I4
-
.
?
-
...,
0)
4)
1..
44
o
4
44
.4
00
(0
4444)
0..
4.4 (4
44
V
4.4
41
is
0
.44
44
4
04
4
V
4
I.
4)14
F
0)
40
.44
.44
04)
0)
0)
44 4
.
4444
VI
VI
440)
£40
0
v
'44
0..
U)
VIVI
0014
140)
0
0)
(4
S.
I
4)
0)
0
0..
0
.0)444
)..
.44
(4.
.•
0)
V
-
.0) .0)
U)
40.44
.44
-4
44
444
444.4
_4_4
U,
On
39 x
10.
V
44
VI
(4
.4444
40
o
I..4
in
co
4'
(4440
440.
_4V
140
VI
0.
14-
4
4
.
440
0)0<
4)40.
9444
V ?
V
.0)
K
K
'4)40
'0 ?
.
4)(fl
4414
00
4)00
0)
4.44)04
144.4
4000
V
0)
'44
0)
(.040
4)
0)40
4)4)
00)
'44
.4
'.4
•Q
04
0<0
00
VI
-
I!)
?
.44
(4
.4444
4)0)
'.4
4)
U)
444
0. c o
0. ).'0
0(4
•.-'
V
'0
04)
I..
0
0)
4)400
In
0)
0)0..
0)
0
404
4)
440)
'00)
(40)0
.0)
4)
4)0
0)44
4)
0.0
0. 4
l
0
'.4
4'
4)
40404)
a.a
.44
'.44)40
).
?
u s'
0
0..
0.
0)
41
-
0001.
14040
0)444)
0
00
.44
.)
a.
0) ?
.44
4) ?
-
.0)
001.
00
.41
4)04' ?
04
0444.
co
0.
0..
14.44 40
W4
VI
14
VIm
-
>..
a
0)
In0...
V) )..14
140)
Id)
40
41 v
004)
co
(40)40
4044
a.
a.
) ?
0)
4) 0)
?
444
4..
1.
1.
14
4)40
14(4'.40
1.
4)
cn
4)
4)
4)
44
4)44.44
?
(4
'4)4)
44140)
4)
44
44EV)
440<
-4
44
'44
44.1
44
4 0
444 0
40 VI
414
44.4
?
0•.4
VI
Cl)
101
.
On
cc
-.4
-
IL)
4,
iE
U.
z
U
-
>
-
.
-4
I
.1
...
•1
0

 
4.1.
•0
0'-.
4..
0
ow
C)
I-
C)
C?
4
4?
0
(I)
4)
I..
0
04
.4..
8 ?
S
-.
0
4)
C3 0
C?
1
4
..
dc
C3
1..
4)4)
CL
C)
4?
0
8
4)4.
4..
4)
0)
1.
0
1.
0
93
61
0
0
0
4)1..
-.
C)
1.4?
4
. ?
.4 8
1.0
0
0
0
2
1.
4?
£4.
CO
I).
1.
5
4)
C)
0
44
4?
4?
tm
44
4)04?)
44
4?
1.
444
4?
?
C)
C)
0
4)4?
C)
C)
4. ?
4
C)
C) C)
I
0
.01.
0
.00
.
S ?
04.
.
04)
440
4?)
00
.4 U
4)1.
C)
UC)C)
.44
4) 0
4)
).
4)
.0 -
0 ?
(4
0.
00
1
g
4?4)
0.0•
C)
4.0)1.
1440
440
4?
.44
41
4J1U)
4?
?
4)
4n ?
w
4)4)0
10.
'44
4) ?
444
C)>4
C)
44)440
4044)
()S
4?)
44.0
4)04)
-
VI
0C)
0.
0444
00
.h
0•
2
0. ?
(3)
.com
0 ?
8
4)04)
4)
1.4)
0.80
-
0
41
?
4?
4)4?.
41U0 IN,
4)444
Q4?
O.
448
C)4J4)
4141
4)8
4)0.-I
80
4)
I
418 ?
40
vi w
4J0
..
4.1.40
u,u
(fl 10
0 0
C)
C)
444
540
CO
I ?
-
?
00000
(3)
434
I
I_I
0.14
144?
00
C)
044
C)
-.
4J0
-
41.
.0
1.
84)
444
'0
C)
9:
C
34
0
O.0
.4 4A
C) 4)
?
p
U - -4 Z I)
U U
-
--4
4.800
?
.0 04
.
4)
LI
£-V0 ?
4)
44
..4 ) •
?
1.
14
0.4
U 1..
1.0
E.
'44 ?
>,
444.1444
40
0
404)
4)
08
4)
?
C)440
44)6
?
080
44
144
.1 ?
.2
C)44e..401.
VI
04?
60
C)0
4)00-'
4)6 0
4)
1.
4)44
1.0
14
4)
••4)
14.4
44.1
-4
4. J ?
..-
-
- 1.
?
'444)
(00
- ?
.' ?
)..
4044
444
C)
- U •
- C)
40.0
406(6.8
6400-
ca
6
40404)
6VI
4a6m40t)
0
go 0
.440 ?
1.
04-4 ?
0
"-4
04 ?
C)
8061.6
04
C)
.4
C)
?
0
4(4
-
40
.44ug
04.44
.4 4444
6
.44 444
C)
..4
1.4
.44 C)44
4.60
.44 Ifl4?
1.4)84) ?
444
4.
060
1.0
04)
06....0
0
000
01..00000
0
•0
C)
4)
C)
4?
4.
4.)
40
8
40
$.
C)
4.)
6
-4
6
6
411
144
4 ?
.44
6
.44
8
0
C)
C)
6
6
0
N
-.
0
Z
N
-
4?)
-
Z
I r -
4-
"3
-)
0
-4
CL)
o
4.)
'4.
-I
th
-
.
-
-4
-4
. 444
0
bd
N
4
4.
£
.
.

 
.
V
V
V
V
44
0
4.1
40
40
41
40
41
.4
.4
.4
4.1
4.1
44
4.1
4.1
41
41
U
U
U
U
U
U
4
4.1
4.1
4.1
0
0
.44
4.1
In
UI
0.
CO
.44
-
o
UI
(4
In
14
.4
0
*5
U
UI
-
D.
4
-
0
U
*5
w
.
143
0
in
*5
4.1
•0
vi
U
In
V
I
-.4
U,
.
0
-3
44
.
V
I
UI
1450
+1
VI
0
0
to
-
•.4
0
'+4
0)'
41
6 0
U) -
u
.444.1
In
O.4
.44 4.1 *44
Ln
- ..
In
(4
O
-
-
O
0444
•••
4J.*
C)
-4
4)
.- .
.4
UI
14
4.1-4
VI
*5
*5 4)
.44
VI.
.4 ?
0)
..4
44
(VU)
4)
4.1 .
V).CIIC
.44 1) .4
-4
-
.44
*5
I.
••1•4)
(4
(514
>43
S
V to
ca
4)
(4
In
-
Q.Q
>
4.4
-4
0
-
•,40.4
.44.
In
C
.0 .2
44 .444.'
•,4.*544
14
4'
-
4Jo.1D
4)
1.1
14+4
V
4)44
0 ?
.44
44.44).0
-4
0
I.
0-4JIn
ca
?
it
l#44.1Q
U0
050
4
0 ?
VI...
0.14
(no
co0
.44)1.4
II
4.1
U,*54)
*4.4
0
4)
-44
4)0
Ifl...4.-4*44
.4
4)
4)
00)
-
.I
E 4) )'
41
-
.0
.
..4 0
41
cc 0.
.0
(5
39
?
4j
(4
(44.1
. 44
.44
.
..U)4450
5) ?
5)
.44
(4
.4
(4
4)4)
CE
(5
,'44'#4
Zcfl
00
'I)
1
.4
>-
S
14.
1
0)
I ? - -
-
>
+4
41
+4
14
U
1..
.
?
.4
m
4.1
44
-4
-4
U.

 
4
U)
0
LU
o
?
c
U)
-
x ?
i-
Na
4)
p..
-j
4.
0
a)
11)
11)
•g
.14
(4.4
.14
U
V
a)
4)
4,
ci)
0
(4)
4)
14)
0
4)
0
1)
0
0
)
?
Z
Z
Z
Z
4
I
14)#4
4)
a)
an
?
0
4)
'44
co
-
co
.
14
.14
Cu
co
4.4
.14
a)a)
a)
4
4J4,..4
0
0
lIla)
4,
4
a)00
00
.14
0
.4
0
?
.14
U
.01.4)
.0
> ?
*
.4.I
4,4.4
4)
4,
-44,4)
0
4)0
4.4
4.4
1
(
4 .
144)
U)
-.
04) ?
-
4)5
4)
4.4
0
V
4.44.)
cn
4)
41
04
44)
In ?
V)
in
.,4 ?
to
.*.
.l4
0
ci)
(440
V.14
(fls
C
U)
(4)
a)
V.0
in V
0
4)
4,
In
go
z
>.
U
C ?
V
4)
U V
.14
0
'.4
4.44.44)
000
$4
a)
4)
11)
4.444)
4)
-
?
.14
4)4)4,
II)
0
.4
0
p..
010
04)4)
(4.41.
1)
• 01.
(4)41
4)4,
4)
•140
o
0
in
4)
4)
(4)
4)
(I)
41
4)
("
4)4)
1.0
C/)
>-
>-
U).O4)
4,
C
o
4)
4.)
4,
.14
-
4)41
(1)
.0
4)4,
0
"1
(4)
1(4
14
.0
C
0
-
4)4.4
(4
(4)
14.4
v p
co
(4)4)
414
(4
0
-44)
4)
(44)
4.
6)
4)
4,
4)
(4)
4)4)
4.0.
C
C
0).
co
.0
4.)
.0-.
04)
0
C)
g
0
-U>
0
41.4
U)
44)
4)
0
4)
0.
6)14)
.144,
1(4
014.4
CIO
(41.0
4)
1<
-
(4)44)
00
41
((40
1/)
N
.4)4.44)
0.0)4
14(4
NC
0
4)
4)
*
*
0
C
*4)
.0
(4)
(4)
4) ?
.4)
0
L;
411)4
(4)
0
000
0-4
0
(4)0
Z-4
Z
U)
'a)
1-
0
I)
ce
-
1))
S
Ii.
-
cz
-
.
.
.

 
•1
?
I:?
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
CRIMINOLOGY DEPARTMENT
M.A. CURRICULUM
Crlm.800-4 Criminological heory
(Core) Lecture/examination.
Crim.801-3 Advanced Criminological
Theory. (Specialty) seminar.
Crim810-4 Phenomena of Crime
(Core) Lecture/examination
Crim.811-3 Ecological or
Environmental Criminology
(Specialty) seminar
Crim.820-4 Criminal Justice
Policy Analysis
(Core) Lecture/examination.
Crim.821-3 Criminal Justice.
Planning and Program
Evaluation.
(Specialty) Seminar
Crim.830-4 Law and Social
Control
(Core) Lecture/examination.
Crim:831-3 Law and Social Policy
(Specialty) Seminar
Crim.960-5 Research Methods
(Core) Lecture/examination
CrimJ61-3 Techniques of
Evalu:itiv° Research
(Specialty) seminar.
Crim. 862-3 Advanced Topics
in Criminological Research
(Specialty) seminar
Crim.870-3 Selected Topics
(Specialty) seminar
Crim.871-3 Directed Readings
Crii,895 ?
. Fsay I
Crim. 896
?
Essay II
Crim.897
?
Project
Crim.88
?
Thesis
NOTE: Not
all
courses are offered
each semester.
.
9

 
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY ?
CRIMINOLOGY DEPARTMENT ?
Illustrative Course Outlines
Course: Criminology 800
Title: ?
Criminological Theory
DESCRIPTION:
This course will provide the student with a comprehensive overview of theories in
criminology. Through lectures, readings and examinations, students will be familiarized
with competing levels of understanding vis a vis crime and deviance phenomena.
Materials and format are constructed to accommodate those who have not previously
experienced an intensive exposure to these theories. Participants will be reading the
works of original authors, as well as critiques and reformulations of the conventional
theoretical positions. The course will strongly emphasize a "paradigm" approach, by
integrating historical and contemporary theory, and by tracing the impact of ideology,
politics, and social structure on the emergence of criminological thought. Traditional
theories will be analyzed through the lens of current perspectives on crime and justice.
Students will be expected to acquire an understanding, not only of theoretical content,
but also of the dynamics of theory construction more generally. Individual theories will
be addressed as both independent and dependent constructs. At each stage in the course,
theoretical positions will be judged according to their structural validity, elegance,
utility, longevity, synchronicity with social forces and justice policy, as well as their
implications for notions of human nature, reform, punishment and justice. Finally, the
course will explore the potential for theoretical integration, i.e., the construction of
multiple factor theory, taking into account the many levels of criminological
explanation.
Course: Criminology 801
Title: Advanced Criminological Theory
DESCRIPTION:
This course is designed to offer the student an intensive exposure to the major
streams of criminological theory. Seminar topics and readings will highlight the
development of thinking about crime as a problem in the sociology of knowledge.
Theoretical "schools" of criminology will be identified, and their contributions will be
analyzed in the context of wider soeio-politicial and philosophical trends. Emphasis will
be placed on the relationship between ideas and social forces, as well as the interplay of
theory and practice.
The course will be structured as a series of colloquia. Individual students will be
responsible for specializing in at least one of the subject areas. As well as directing'
class discussion in their area of specialization, students will be expected to prepare a
major research paper focussing on one theoretical school. Since this course will
emphasize selective concentration on the part of students, it will be assumed that
participants have already acquired a fundamental background in the elements of
criminological theory.
?
40

 
2.
.
Course: Criminology 810
Title: The Phenomena of Crime
DESCRIPTION:
This course is designed for the beginning graduate student and covers a wide
variety of topics
all
of which deal with what we know about the phenomena of crime and
what we know about crime historically, temporarily and geographically. This course will
look at the patterns of crime and victimization. It will explore crime patterns at local,
provincial, national and international levels. Known characteristics of offenders and
victims will be covered. Finally, characteristics of specific forms of crime will be
studied. The emphasis throughout the course will be on the sources of our knowledge of
crime and how we can learn more about crime.
Course: Criminology 811
Title: ?
Advanced Topics in Phenomena of Crime
DESCRIPTION:
• This course is an advanced seminar which will build on what is covered in Crim.
810. The content of the course
:
will vary somewhat depending on the interests of the
students taking the course and the faculty member teaching the course.
Topics covered in the course may include historical criminology, the ecology of
crime, environmental criminology, the media and crime, fear of crime, victimization,
organized crime, white collar crime.
The general format of the course will include some lectures and some seminar
presentations. Guest speakers will be invited in special topic areas.
Course: Criminology 820
Title: Criminal Justice Policy Analysis
DESCRIPTION:
This course will provide an introduction to policy development and policy analysis
in the field of criminal justice. The course will include a general review of the function
of bureaucratic agencies in the public sector and the particular role of government
ministries providing criminal justice services. The course will include an analysis of
political/bureaucratic interface in the development of public policy as well as the
involvement of non-government or private sector agencies. Subject matter to be covered
includes: how policy is formed, including administrative and legal constraints; the ethics
of policy making in the public sector how policy analysis is performed the role of
• policy planning and the mechanisms of policy planning. Major topic areas include:
organization theory policy planning theory; decision theory and inter-governmental
analysis as it applies to the administration of justice.

 
Course Criminology 821
Title: Criminal Justice Planning and Program Evaluation
DESCRIPTION:
This seminar course will provide students with an opportunity to address specific
problems in criminal justice planning and program evaluation. Topics for in-depth
analysis which will be selected according to the availability and interest of specific
course instructors. Generally, the course will provide an overview of planning and
program evaluation techniques with application to issues in criminal justice. Topics may
be selected from any area of service delivery in criminal justice including law
enforcement, the judiciary, court administration, corrections, or legal services. The
course will provide an overview of the systems approach in criminal justice planning and
relate program evaluation to the major types of planning initiatives taken within the
criminal justice system including reactive and proactive planning. The student will have
the opportunity to relate the various techniques in program evaluation to the objectives
chosen for planning, including planning for policy-making.
Course Outline - Crimiminology 830
Title: LAW AND SOCIAL CONTROL
DESCRIPTION:
This course will offer students the opportunity to examine the social utility of
legal intervention in the instance of criminal law; the relationship between law and social
order will be discussed and analyzed, with respect to both legal theory and practice. An
understanding of the process of law-making and the social efficacy of specific criminal
sanctions is integral to our discussion of law and other modes of social control.
The intention of the course is to acquaint students with the relationship that
exists between legal theory and legal practice.
The focus of our efforts is thus set on longitudinal studies of law-making and law-
breaking, attempting to comprehend the intentions and consequences of such purposive
social action. A wide range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies will be
accessed, with study of legal practice ultimately accountable to theoretical explanations
of law and social order.
Course: Criminology 831
Title: Law and Social Policy
DESCRIPTION:
This "specialty' course in the core area of Law and Social Control is designed to
provide students with an understanding of the relationship that exists between law and
public policy. As a specialty offering, it can be accommodated to the expertise of the
specific instructor. While the overriding concern of the course will always be the
interaction between law and policy, the context of the discussion might be found in law
.

 
4.
and mental health, the process of law reform, or victimless crime. The course is needed
to supplement the more theoretically oriented content of the core course, Law and Social
Control.
Course: Criminology 860
Title: RESEARCH METHODS
DESCRIPTION:
This course is the research and methodology core course. It is designed for a
beginning graduate student wh& has minimal undergraduate training in research and
methods. The course will coverbasic research design for criminological problems and
basic techniques of statistical
an
a
lysis.
The course will be oriented towards "hands on"
research situations and problem sessions on the computer. The research methods covered
will include experimental design
i
and non-experimental designs more frequently used in
criminology. The statistical techniques covered will include contingency table analysis,
and regression analysis as well as an overview of more advanced techniques.
Course: Criminology 861
Title: Advanced Research Methods
$
• ?
DESCRIPTION:
This course is designed tofollow the beginning course in research methods. It is
designed for the more advanced graduate student and is built on the knowledge base
developed in the introductory course. As with the introductory course this course is a
"hands-on" project/problem oriented course where the student develops conceptual skills
as well as competency in analyzing data.
The course covers both parametric and non-parametric techniques, but -
emphasizes parametric statistical analysis. The course will cover analysis of variance,
regression analysis, and analysis of covariance, discriminant analysis, and other
techniques of interest to the students. The approach will be conceptual and will
emphasize the strengths and limitations of the various statistical techniques in
criminological research.
Course: Criminology 862
Title: Advanced Topics in Criminological Research
DESCRIPTION:
This course is an advanced methods course. Advanced statistical and non-
statistical techniques in criminal justice research will be covered. Special attention will
be given to some, or all, of the following evaluative research, prediction techniques,
systems analysis, cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis and computer simulation
modelling.

 
Faculty are identified below who are designated as eligibl
to teach in each of the core areas,.
Criminological Theory - C
.
rim.800-4; Crirn. 801-3
Robert Menzies
Douglas Cousineau
Duncan Chappell
Patricia Brantingham
Paul Brantinghani
Phenomena of Crime - Crim.810-4; Crim.811-3
Robert Menzies
Douglas Cousineau
Duncan Chappell
Patricia Brantingharn
Paul Brantingham
Ezzat Fattah
John Lowman
Criminal Justice Policy Analysis
.-
Crim.820-4; Crim.821-3
Patricia Brantingham
Paul Brantingham
John Ekstedt
Margaret Jackson
Raymond Corrado
Law and Social Control - Crim.830-4; Crim.831-3
Duncan Chappell
Neil Boyd
Judith Osborne
Simon Verdun-Jones
Research Methods - Crim.860-5; Crim.861-3; Crim.862-4
Ted Palys
Patricia Brantirgham
Robert Menzies
Ronald
Roesch
Raymond Corrado
th
page 1 of 2

 
Faculty identified below are eligible to supervise Crim.899 (Thesis)
Douglas Cousineau
Duncan Chappell
Patricia Brantingham
Paul Brantingham
Ezzat Fattah
JohnLowman
Johr Ekstedt
Raymond Corrado
Neil Boyd
Simon Verdun-Jones
Ted Palys
Shelley Gavigan
Judith Osborne
Curt Griffiths
Ronald Roesch
1-71
?
page 2 of 2
.
r

 
U) ?
C)
3.
0
EE
in
W ?
4.)
:.
.c.
C)
S..s
C)
o
1:0
ot
o
;J ?
C)
>
C) C)
•4(
r
C)
'4-4 ?
0 ?
C)
4.)
:
?
' ?
:
•.
?
4.i
o
4:
C)
0
C)
?
'J
'4 '
-a
U
C)
U)
(1.)i'-I
C,.,r0C:)
.0 0
?
4.4
?
>C)C)
r;
Q
00
c."O
0
?
C-i
0
•(71'-
O
4 .
C)
40-i
r4(
C)
).iQC)
rtn
C)
0 . "
4
?
c..44iç),
4
0
J C ?
in
•J.r..r)
U)U)
?
i
.C)
C)
0
r
4J)0,4
rou:
0-1u
•.-ir-icj
CIL1
4i:)-4
:i>o
I t
'i
t
CL,--4(()
w(1
Qti.i...
C-i ?
CY' ?
-i
.
E-
0)
L)
?
C.)
••4JC)C)'i)
r.14-c:1Qr
::.c:oo
&j
C
C) 0 c
-4:-
>i(Q-s
rj ?
) C-
0Qo
>
0
C-i
U
>1
CO
U)
C) co
::.-, ?
C:
rj
or -
•-
C-i
4))
?
C'
..4 ?
C)
.,
I
u :
..
c: r'
C)
.c w ?
-
0
0
-.
?
C)
U
C) (
,.,
.,.,
U)''
>1::.:-'4
C) 00
00
C-i
If) ?
-,
C.) ?
•-4
U-4
U
:.
C-)
0C-i
•>(5
•If)
?
• ?
4)
.,. ?
4)
4:
r N
4: (Z)
<
4 N
• 0 0
• -4aN
'
• ?
• 0
::a4-i
'-
)-4
C))
.0
If'
o
C .
.,.
4.)
U
r.
C)
.-
?
i-C
0
:
0
0
".4
>1
U)
(I)
U
II)
0
U)I.4
0
•()
-'
?
CC)cJ
0U)
••
?
?
4'
OC-
.—'
-
0-1
0c
tf)'...O
U
N
.CC"4i,-4
() QN
C44
U)>
?
'.4
>,
0
4
0
-4
C)
?
41
Ct ?
4fl
?
4:
• ?
.
4:i
• ?
.
4:- .
• 44.4 CO
?
U)
•c
X)<
?
fl0
?
C/)
•r.O(y
U)
0
C) 'U
U: -1
C) 0
CD
C)
s-I
C)
C)
C)
C-i
N
C)
C)
.
(T)
0
4-)
o
S4
C)
0
S.
?
i.:1
0
.0
'-4
ra
4:
"-4
>
U)
Ct)
Ct)
0
C)
(0
0
4.)r4
p_)
0
.
.0
_C::
0
0)
-
0
0
>1
(C)
c;:.
a)
-
'C,
0
)
U)
C-i
C)
.0
(Cj
'0
0)
4-I
0
".4
4-) ?
Z
cc
C-i
4)
C)
?
4Jtfl ?
0)
.,.4 4])
0)
z
0-'
3.
) 0'
0 (Ut
0
C).,..:
f) (_),
0.
C))
If)
0
C)
I r l
C,
4) .0
V) 4-)l
.4)
C.) 0
• (4
'I-i
o (
C)
' C.)
.4 >,
?
.,4 Q
?
0
.1
4-
00
IH
(V)
?
f')
?
(N ?
('4
I ?
I ?
I ?
I ?
I
C' ?
'1 ?
I
.-.
co ?
m
('P)
??
co
('4

 
Arperji :c C
?!P.!2 Y j
1!B tO
E
Olriit
ies
f
r
?
(
Cr
?
in) ?
t
I
:nts (C,an
i'lit)
I .
?
Agenc
or more
I es
Ph
s u
.1)'
r yvcd
s
(1
(Cr
¶)8
im.
2
)
) i nd I en I I n
?
1Juj
tt'uci t t o
err;
I ov cn e
L
A ?
tit
G 1,
if
A
t ?
izcEvnn CO
I
I cçe ( •i
roun t Ito
.
V11
I (
'
i, I
?
ce (
British CoUrmbju
College of New Un I edon In (I
Universit vofV
j
eto1 .
j,, (1)
On t a r I a
Uni
vers i ty of (. twn ( I )
It 11
I tobn
University of
?
Inr it obii (1)
Atlili
ntie
Provinces
St. Franj
s
Xnv Icr Un i vers it
v (i)
St. Mary's University (i)
(
IJus t i cc AgeneLes
Alberta
Eli zbe t h Fry Soc let y-( n I gary (I)
British Columbia
Huma n
Rights Program, l)ep t . of Lalwur (3)
Ombudsman (1)
toha
Probation Servi'e (2)
JUVenile Correct ions (1)
Saskatchewan
Attorney General's
F'eptntuwnt (1)
Federal Civil Service
Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics (1)
Ministry of Solicitor General
Atlantic Region (1)
Prairie Region (2)
Programs Branch, Ottawa (2)
Police and Security
Brunch,
Ottrwn (2)

 
II. Ageneies
emp 1 ovmt.:
Irt
it for
Canada
pe 1-son5;
identfied
wi
t
h a I'll
tis
.1.).
potent
(Ur i m.
j
uz !y piuvicjjn
I:duci t
I
o:ut 1
?
IllS t
I
tilt
i
ALBERTA
1.
Te Univ ?
usi t
?
of Aiher ta
?
Depar tmut of Soc iOlorjy.
2.
The
U
niversity of
C
aiqary - D
r^
nlartinont of Socioloqy.
3.
Jniv2r:ity
?
of
?
?
rt1hhri(e ?
-.
?
L
?
ulty
?
of
Arts.
4.
Ath
i - 1 1 ),asca ?
TJnjverjty
Mount ?
floval CoUc;.e
.
Procjrail.
uart ?
Mact:wn Coi.3.
?
-Correctjnai
?
TUstj
7.
Lethbridge
Com
munity College -
L
a
w !
nforcement Dept.
I3RITISU COLUMBIA
3.
ii
versity
?
of: ?
V
ictor
j
1 ?
- ?
Facilit-y
?
of ?
Liw.
9.
COntinuing
U
niversity
EduCation.
of Briti
?
Columbia -
Faculty of
10.
Coll
Sc
ie-ces.
?
of New Caledonia -
T
i j
hera1 ?
Arts and
U.
u;tjc ?
instit.tit
p
?
of
?
T3ritish
?
Columhj
12.
Okmq
?
Coi.leqe -
Academic and
Applied
Studies.
13. C ap j
laIr) Co.l1qf- - Legal Studies.
14. Douj1
?
College, Criminal Justice Program.
15.
Fraser Valley
Coileqe,
Criminal
Justice
Proqram.

 
I ?
*
16. Vancouver Communit
y
College, Crimin.)i
Jtitjr,
-
?
Projrain.
. ?
MANITOBA
17.
Brandon tin ive; i ty - Department of Soc iolc;v.
18.
University of W.nnipeg
19.
University of Manitoba - Department: of ocio1ocjy.
20. University
of
Manitoh -- I'acn1.ty
of
ONTARIO
21.
McMaster Un i
y
e: si ty
?
Chairman of Graduate nroqU3111n.
22.
Gue1h University
?
De:irtrnf
3
nt Of ocioloqv
2:3. Carelton University -- Department Of oc1o).ojy.
24.
Quccns Univer3i.ty - Depa r tment:
Of ?
C
iolojv
25. University of
Ottaw
-
Department of
Criminology-
26.
University of Toronto - Centre of Criminology.
27.
Seneca Colleqe of Applied Arts and Technolojy.
28.
Number Colleqe - Law and Security Program.
29.
Algonquin College -
Law and Security Program.
30.
Ontario Police College.
31.
Sheridan College.
32.
Conestoga College, Crimlnolojy and L
?
nforcement.
33.
Georgian College, Law and
Scuritv
Administration.
34.
T
oya1ist Coliege,Law and Security tianaqement.
35.
Sir Sandford Fleming College, Law and Security
Administration.
ATLANTIC PROVINCES
36.
College of Cae Breton - Faculty of Arts and
Sciences.
37.
Mount Allison University - Faculty of Arts.

 
A
38.
Memorial University - Pactilty Of Arts.
39.
SocioltDgy/Anthropogy.
Mount 11son University - Department of
?
I
40.
Acadia University - Faculty of Art.
41.
St. Francis Xavier University.
42.
St. Mary's University.
43.
Urivrity of P.E.T.
•1
0

 
I
?
t
0
Criminal Jut.ice Aqcncje
The followinq is
?
! i
st
of criminal 1ustir acjc
.
iic ics wh ic
cc
'
m)r isecl one corn)ocrt of tL'.' P i.e H Study. '
;
t.
e .
ff
l
j
ad
r
:av be acquire( b
y
, conu
t ?
t.Iu
Can:di zn A::j
t:ir
FCC
reVtnt. -m uC C
1
i me, Set viCes Directory, M
ALBERTA
?
I.. ?
C
Correczt
en € r a 1
j
r'!
Serviec; 1.)
j v j
jon, 1'.i ?- ?
Si.j
?
2.
?
E1. j
-h T.'r
y
?
UCiet'/, E'j!flQfltC)p
?
3
?
11! zabezh Fr
y
So
id'1
Calqary.
?
4.
?
Albrrta Crime
?
JnpenJtjori Board.
?
. ?
Tttnr'ev
Director,
General.
t,eql Research and AnaiVi;, ri:
1 ?
of th
6. Y q
it.h De/elOjnnnt C.:nt.j ,
F(l!flfltofl
7.
Di
Attorney
rector,
General.
Cr iina].
Just ice Pro-j ranv, Dept tf
8.
Alberta, O.[fice of the Ombudsman.
3PI'rISi COLtJM311\
. B.C. Police CornrnjS4jofl.
10. B.C.
Ministry of the Attorney
r
,enetal , Corctjo5
Branch, Vancouver e.ori.
11. B.C.
C
orrections, Northern Re;ion.
12.
B.C. Correctj(,r,
Staff
Developmnt
Analyst.
13.
B.C. Corrections, South Fraser Reqion.
14.
of
Director,
the Attorney
Program
General.
An1y3i
g
and
Eva1aLion, Minit
15. Corrections
Branch, B.C. Vancouver tind
P.eqion

 
16 .
The ?
Om ?
1 smart ?
for
?
Bri
?
i. ;h
?
Ce)
ub i a
17.
1hnn:n ?
Ri']hts
?
Puxram, ?
Ministry ?
of
?
f.bnr,
18.
Th o ?
3hn
?
}cward ?
Sc.cic'ty
of
?
''.
MA I
TO
19.
Manitoba Human Rights Comm10,
?
Department- of the
Attoriey General.
20 .
0uhu
j
f;:-n , ?
t:n i
toha
21.
an i toha
?
fiumn ?
R iqt
?
Commi
?
r: on
22.
John :ozard ?
n1 E.
?
Fry
of Mn i toha
23.
Dcr- ?
of ?
Wirmj.j
M.tba,
?
Jvnjie ?
Cor
25. !/. :,
1
1-1
ni toha
?
\hii t
?
Cor ctct ions.
26.
Ai:;;j ?
Cent.r
?
for: ?
Youth,
?
t4anj ?
oh,:.
27.
Manitoba
?
Y 0,1th ('cntre
28.
Man
P
i.tobi,
?
ions;
?
Dent. ?
of
?
the
?
ttot ny-GenPra1,
?
Dfrector
of
2').
N1anioha Probation Service.
30.
Manjtoh ?
Police Cornmjgio.
31.
The ?
Criminal
?
1njuri
?
Cornpenti
?
floard.
ATLANTIC PROVINCES
32.
Ne.: ?
1rL1n,;wjcc
?
iicc ?
Co:nmi:3j_
33.
Wo ?
k ?
Compen;;- t ion r3oar(1 ,
?
Foot h
34.
Court
P.E. :
Services.
, ?
Dpartr ?
ut ?
of Jutfc, ?
ProLijcm and Family
35.
Nova
?
Sc o tia
?
O:ubu(L3mart.
36.
1. ?
Department of Health and Social
?
Srviue.
37.
Ornbu9;man,
?
Newfoundland.
33.
Crimi n.I
?
Injurie.; ?
Co mpensation
?
flo.jr ?
.

 
39.
Nova Scot La P:olice Ccntmis;ion.
?
-
?
-
40.
Nu; irunswick Uuman Ri.qhs
Cmrnisj
.n.
41.
Nw
ProqrEi
irun;wick,
iii .
Department of .Twt
Director
iue,
of
42.
P.F.t., Dcprtrnnt of
Justice,
Corr !. :.
ton5
flivsion.
43.
Nfld. and
I')t1d0r,
, Adult
Cor
rection,-, Dlv Is Ion,
Deoartrnent ol Justice.
44. At1iitic
?
-
45.
Atlantic T; .oi:ì1.
?
ultn:t,
Soi.r,i:
Cnrral o
Cnad-.i
4C.
?
Erunswic:
(trctna1
Tv j r . ?
V)i
47. Corr:oction ?
D.ivis ion,
?
e;711,t7
?
I
) t
u r,
.V_.0 '.
48.
49.
co.
.
?
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
7.
Nova SCOt Li,
rTh)1rt;ileflt
c: ?
a I
Nova Scotia, D(
?
r: trnt. of (Die At: i':j ny
?
rif
rat
Correctional Servic'; Di v
Nova Scotia. Jnhn T1o;drd Sos
ONTMIO
Ontario Human iaht Comm ii ion.
Criminal Injuries Compensation Bcard.
John Howard Society ol Ontario.
Ministry
of th Solicitor General, Ontario.
Ministry of th Attorn(.,,y General., (rIo.
Office of the Onbudin, Ontar io.
Ontario Provincial.
P'1.ice.
58.
Ministry o' Com:nur.ity and Social Services,
Ontari).
59.
Ministry of Correctiori1 Services.
a,

 
S
I'll
SKATCUFWAJ
60.
Saskatoon
?
rjiorljj Office, Departmnt of Justice.
61.
Personnel and Training Branch, Dept. of the Attorney
General.
62.
Criminal
the
A
ttorney
Justice
General.
C oord j
nat j
nj Committee, Dept. of
63.
Policing Branch, Dept. of the Attor;v"/-G rr l,
Sa.akat-chcwan
Skatchewan, Public Prosecutions Frnch.
5.
Cot rect i on D
j
vjj, Saskatchowan Po i al erv ices.
YUKON a
n
cl N.W.T.
6.
Trtinincj
Dent. 'f Healt.h
BrancH.
ard
ilurnn esojrce, ?
aeacch and
/•
1\ii
'r
?
lio:
rLoriai
I ty
CoTn ernt
j
o,i for \'ictim: ?
Cri
68.
N.
LTerritories, Chief of Corrctjo;, Social
Services.
FEDnrAr.
GOVERNMENT
Training and Human Resources,
N
ational Parole
Board.
69.
The Correctional Investigator,
Canai
70. C
orrectional Service of Canada, Req,nai Chief,
Planning and Analysis - Offender Pro-Jrarns.
71.
Prairios and
1
4.W.T Regional CnsuU:;rt, CoLiSultation
Centre, Solicitor General of
C-nin.
7R.
Canada
Police and security Branch,
Soictr General of
73.
General
Programs
of
Branch,
Canada.
Resarch Division,
:.)ljC1tC
74.
General.of
Programs Branch,
Cahada.
Consultation Centre,
SOlicit)t
75. Canadian
Centre
for Criminal JUstice Statist:j
76. Regional
C on;uitant,
C
onsultation
Centre,
Soljcjtr

 
General of Can,-Ada.
77.
Yukon, Health and Human Resoircen, Re;earci
and
• ? Training Branch.
78.
Solicitor
Programs Branch,
General
Planning
of Canada.
and Liaon Division,
79.
Solicitor General
of Canada,
Statitjcs Division.
80.
RCMP, Staffing and Personnel Branch.
81. Correctional
Service
of Canada, Praii Rcjion.
82.
Statistics
Canada,
Ottawa.
83.
Canadian Human Rights
Commission.
.
El'

 
• ?
•.I
?
II ?
KV.
H
?
CAN,% ?
V',i\ SH
1 ?
I. ?
1! '..:"jl 4?Y
February 29, 1984
Professor C. Friel
Assistant Director
Criminal Justice Centre
Sam Houston State University
Huntsville, Texas
U.S.A.
77340
Dear Professor Friel:
Thank you for agreeing to serve as an assessor
of the proposed
Ph.D. Criminology Programme.
?
is
The honorarium paid by this University for such services is
$200. I enclose a copy of the proposal, a copy of the University
Graduate Regulations governing all graduate students at Simon
Fraser, and a description of the proposed programme as well as a
npi lation of curricula vitae.
The Assessment Caitnittee would appreciate your frank arinents
on the academic merit and suitabilit
y
of the proposed programme.
Please include in your report answers to the following questions:
1.
Is the available academic expertise (see attached curricula
vitae) sufficient to implement the programme?
2.
DD
you think that graduates of the programme will be of quality
comparable to those produced at the leading institutions in the
field?
3.
How large is the need for the graduates that this programme
would produce and is it a continuing need?
4.
Is the particular prograxme proposed likely to meet the stated
objectives?
You should note that these questions are not meant to limit the
range of your coirrnents in any way.

 
S
I.
OOZ
?
February 29, 1984
rtherrnore, it would be most helpful if you could make, in
addition to your other ccztnents, specific recarrrendations on
either the approval, modification, delay or disapproval of the
program.
Your report will be made available, upon request, to members
of the Comnittees and other governing bodies both within and without
the University that must approve the programme before it can be
imD1nted.
It would be appreciated if, you could see your way to responding
within the next couple of weeks.
ofessor C. Friel
7
)ro
sincerely,
,0o
Johh M. Webster, Associate Vice-President,
Academic and Dean of Graduate Studies
J7/dle
Attachments
is

 
CENTRE OF CRIMINOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO
JOHN P. ROBARTS RESEARCH LIBRARY
?
ROOM 8001. 130 ST. GEORGE ST.
?
TORONTO MSS 1AI
THE DIRECTOR
?
(416) 978-3720
LI
16 April 1984
Professor John M. Webster
Dean of Graduate Studies
Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, B.C.
V5A 156
Dear Professor Webster:
First of all, I would like to apologize for my delay in
responding to your letter requesting my assessment of the
proposed Ph.D. program in Criminology at Simon Fraser University.
All of the ususal excuses made at this time of year apply and,
quite frankly, I wasn't aware that as much time had elapsed as,
in fact, has since you wrote to me.
I have read the materials that you sent me quite carefully
and find both strengths and weaknesses in the proposed program.
I should point out that we, here at the Centre of Criminology,
are currently considering applying for permission to begin a
Ph.D. program in Criminology ourselves. I don't think that puts
me in a position of conflict of interest, but I raise the point
for reasons of fairness in case something I say might be
interpreted (correctly or incorrectly) as being related to our
own tentative plans. Much of what I have to say about your
proposed program is related to questions that have arisen in our
own discussions about a Ph.D. program. pence the issues are not
new to me.
I will eventually address the questions you raised in your 7
March letter; however, I hope that you do not mind if I formulate
questions (and answers) somewhat differently from the way in
which they were formulated in your letter before addressing your
questions.
1) Does SF0 need to have a Ph.D. program in Criminology? I asked
this queTon for the simple reason that the existence of the
"Admission under special arrangements" system that does exist does
allow the exceptional student to get a Ph.D. in criminology at
Simon Fraser. It does not, however, allow a program per se to be
advertised or set up within the department; hence good students
.
.

 
C ?
- ? S
from other Universities' cannot easily be recruited into the
program. In addition, it does not allow for there to be a real
group of Ph.D. students
?
would benefit from eachother. Looked
at in these ways, having a Ph.D. in criminology would clearly be
a good thing.
2)
Is there a market for Ph.D.'s in Criminology from SFU? It
think it is clear from the documentation provided to me and from
our own informal surveys that the answer is overwhelmingly "yes."
As they point out, therearè no English language Ph.D. programs
in Canada. Even if we were to start one here at Toronto, it would
probably never admit moie than five people per year and probably
it would have fewer than that. There is plenty of room for a
program at SFU. Indeed, I would welcome a Ph.D. at SFU for
another reason: I think' that even if we were to have a Ph.D. here
at Toronto the emphasis' would be somewhat different. SFU tends to
have a slightly higher emphasis on those in criminal justice
careers than we do. Hence the programs would probably end up
being somewhat different. Indeed, since I don't see what would
probably be slightly different emphases to be quality
differences, I think that the SFU program that is proposed (and
the students likely to be attracted to it) would complement ours
(if we ever get a program) rather than compete with it.
3)
Can a program really be mounted without additional resources?
I think that the designers of the program may be overly
optimistic in thinking that additional resources will not be
needed. I don't know how much teaching they are doing at the
• ?
moment, but Ph.D. supervision can obviously involve a lot of
time. In particular, in this field it can involve the department
(or the advisor) in ,a lot of negotiating for research access.
Hence there are "real" time costs to be considered. I would
strongly urge the Department, however, to start with a small
program and to keep it small for quite some time. There will be
strong pressure on admissions in the beginning and it would be
best, I think, to limit enrollment to only those outstanding
students who clearly will benefit from a program such as is being
proposed.
4)
Are the people likely to be entering the program likely to be
appropriate for Ph.D. studTes?
Eh,
I raise
question because
programs in applied areas such as this one are likely to attract
people who think that they are appropriate for doctoral studies
but, in fact, are not. I think that one of the things that the
department might want to re-think is how they would keep out
people in applied settings who really don't have the capabilities
or real interests in doctoral work. I note, in particular, the
notion that those "who meet the GPA requirements and who have
demonstrated research ability through field experience in
criminal justice may also be considered [for entry directly into
the Ph.D. program with only a BA in criminology] on
recommendation of at least two faculty members involved in the
program"
(p.
12). My own recommendation is that this is a very
dangerous thing to do, especially since demonstrating "research
experience through field experience" is very hard to assess. In

 
addition, it is exactly this kind of person -- the person in the
field who thinks s/he is capable of doctoral work but really
doesn't understand what research really is -- who could easily
end up bringing down the standards (and the reputation) of the
program. Talking intelligently about criminal justice policy and
doing first class research in criminal justice are two quite
different sets of skills. Some may have both sets; but the
presence of one tells little, I think, about whether the person
has the other set of skills.
5)
Are the requirements sensible I personally would question
whether it is really appropriate (see page 13) to have the
choice that exists for the comprehensive exams. In particular, I
think that the "Research methods" comprehensive should be
required of all, given the variety of things that people do in
criminology.
6)
Are the courses reasonable? The manner in which criminology
should be taught at any level is not established to a degree that
there is consensus on how the field should be split up. I would
think that the course requirements are as sensible as anything
that one might come up with though different places will have
different ways of organizing the field.
7)
Are the staff productive researchers who are capable of
teaching and supervising graduate students at the doctoral level?
It is her that I think the proposal is weakest. I should hasten
to say that this statement is not a reflection on the department
as a whole, nor is it a reflection on individual members of the
Department. ?
Most of the staff are, as far as I can tell (at
least one of the c.v.'s I was sent appeared to be seriously out
of date) very productive researchers. The work that they have
done is extensive and varied. The research tends to have more of
an emphasis on evaluative research and research of immediate
policy relevance than the research carried out in some places;
generally it is of very high quality.
The problem that I see is that there are some people who are
associated with the program who are really, from my perspective,
a bit too academically young to be involved in the training of
Ph.D. students. Some do not have their doctorates yet and, I
think, shouldn't be involved in the training of doctoral
students. (The legally trained staff might be excluded from this
suggestion given that doctorates are relatively rare in law).
Some of the others aren't really well enough established yet, in
my opinion, to be involved in doctoral teaching, but undoubtedly
soon will have enough proven research experience to make this a
non-issue. It is this area, I think, where the proposal is the
weakest.
Obviously different people would count the staff in
different ways. Using my criteria for "acceptable level of proven
research capability", I would count about eight who are clearly
capable and a few others who are marginal. This isn't bad and
probably is sufficient in and of itself. I would, therefore,
.

 
- - suggest that the department might want to re-think who could be
involved in graduate teaching and/or supervision.
?
8) Are there ways of strengthening the proposal? I didn't see a
reference to ways of
.
using expertise that exists in other
departments for the Ph.D. in criminology. I would think that
the Department might want to explore whether there are people
whose interests are not primarily criminological who might well
be able to contribute to a program such as this one, in such
ways, for example, as by serving on dissertation supervision
committees. An agreement by a few people elsewhere at SFU might
well have a large benefit to the program.
I can now return to the four questions that were put to me
in your letter of 7 March. First, there is available academic
expertise for the program, though what is defined as adequate
might want to be re-examined. Second, given that the staff are
productive researchers and there is every reason to believe are
also good graduate teachers, they should produce high quality
Ph.D's as long as they limit their admissions to those few people
who are really top research students. Third, there is no real way
to forecast need, but I am confident that the need for such a
program exists and will continue to exist for some time. Fourth,
I have suggested a few minor changes in the proposal. They are
minor because essentially the program looks like one that will
meet its objectives.
I hope that this letter is of some help to you.
Sicerely,
Anthony N. Doob
Director

 
FACULTY OF LAW
?
OFFICE OF THE DEAN
?
THE. UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
VANCOUVER, CANADA V61 1W5
26 March 1984
?
(604) 228-2818
Dr. John M. Webster
Associate Vice President, Academic
and Dean,. Graduate Studies
Simon Fraser University.
Burnaby,
?
B_ C.
V5A 1S6
Dear Dr. Webster:
Re: ?
Proposed Ph.D. Programme in the Department of Criminology
I have examined the material you forwarded to. me pertaining, to. the. above:
proposal and have reached the following
; contlusions:
1. ?
A Ph.D., programme does indeed appear
,
to be- a. logical outgrowth of' a., very
successful undergraduate and-
?
p:nogramme in Criminology at. Simon
Fra:se'r University.
2.. ?
The programme proposal is consistent with Simon Fraser Univelrs.ity"s:
genera-1 regulations pertaining: to. gria;dua:te studies and. in terms of
course requirements and disserttio1i would. offer a. rigorou.s a.n-d: detai.led.
programme.
3.
?
My impression is that the faculty- in the: Criminology Department are very
good in terms of the range of ex-pertise. they have as well as their-
academic depth in specialised subjects..
?
Tb my knowled-ge at lea:s,t. six
have international reputations. (Professo.rs Brant.ingham (both), Chappell,
Fattah, Roesch, and Verdu.n-Jones)'... As well, two faculty membe:rs.
(Professors Chappell and Fattah) a-re a-cknowledged scholars by any
standard in their respective fields.
I am unable to comment on the other memb:ers of faculty but this. should
not be regarded as a negative. feature since there is. no rea:sori why I
should have come in contact with their resea.rch in terms of-my own
discipline. ?
Looking at the curriculum vita-e provided I am struck by
the achievements of all the departmental faculty members both in-terms
of' publications and obta-ining, resea-rch grants,. having regard to. their,
ages and level of experience..
My impression is that the department's academic expertise will
undoubtedly be sufficient to implement the programme', subject. to- one
caveat. ?
This pertains to the three courses on Research Methods.
.

 
These courses are key to the success of the graduate programme at the
Ph.D. level and only Professors Palys and Patricia Brantingham are
identified as eligible to teach them.
?
Given the constraints of leave?
and the demands of the undergraduate programme I would have been happier
to see at least one other member of the Department designated as having
the expertise necessary to pick up those courses if required.
?
In a
?
sense, this is merely a cavil since administrative allocation of
teaching resources can always ensure that these particular courses are
covered off.
4.
Given the quality of the faculty and the presence of the Criminology
Research Centre and the Institute for Studies in Criminal Justice
Policy, as well as the academic structure of the proposed Ph.D.
programme, I have little doubt that prospective graduates will be
comparable to those produced by the leading institutions in North
America and England.
?
I would have had no doubt at all if I had been
satisfied that the library resources available, to the Department of
Criminology were sufficiently comprehensive to ensure that all the
relevant source material would be readily available to prospective
students. ?
I was not given a statement relating to such library
• ?
resources and thus cannot pass any comment on them.
5.
It is very difficult to gauge the extent of the need for graduates of
the type of programme proposed.
?
The Department has surveyed a number
of potential users and has found considerable depth of interest.
?
The ?
Department surveyed the field and concluded that an average of 19
potential positions for graduates in such a programme would be available
each year over the next five years in this country.
?
This may be an?
optimistic projection in the light of present economic conditions but it
does reveal that the very specialised expertise that the programme would
develop would at least render the graduates competitive in the Canadian
market. ?
I suspect that the need for such graduates is likely to be a?
continuing one rather than a diminishing one.
6.
Although the objectives of the programme are not explicit in the
proposal statement they are implicit in the rationale set out.
?
I
believe that the intrinsic value in terms of academic goals has been
well made out and that the proposed programme will indeed enrich the
existing undergraduate and Master's programme in the Criminology
Department. ?
As well, such a Ph.D. programme will undoubtedly attract
?
very highly qualified sLudents to the Department who will, on
graduation, ultimately provide a pool of highly trained
research-oriented, professionals who should prove most attractive to
prospective institutional employers.
S

 
.
- 3. -.
My general conclusion is that the proposal is meritorious and makes a convincing
case for the establishment of a Ph.D. in Criminology at Simon Fraser University.
The University may be wise to commit some scarce resources towards beefing up
its Faculty strength relating to Research Methods courses and should also be
convinced, that its library resources, are sufficient.
If youwould like me to elaborate on wha.t I have said or deal with any other
matter p-lease do not hesitate to let me know.
Kindest regards,
Yours sincerely
Peter' Burns
Dean
PTB:lw ? .
?
.
U

 
UNIVERSITE DE MONTREAL
ECOLE DE CRIMINOLOGIE
Mardi, 17 avril 1984
Professor John M. Webster:
Associate Vice-president
Dean of Graduate Studies
Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, B.C.
V5A 1S6
Dear Professor Webster,
As agreed, I have reviewed the proposed Ph.D. programme in
Criminology. Here are my observations.
0 ?
The programme
The proposed programme follows a model which has been adopted in
various North American universities and has already demonstrated
its value. I think that it is good. The courses cover a wide
spectrum of topics on crime, social control and criminology,
looking at the issues primarily from a sociological perspective.
The programme seems well balanced, both in terms of the subjects
covered and the amount of work required from the students.
Of course, the value of this remark depends very much on the extent
to which different groups will be formed for Masters and Ph.D.
students. I assume that a student who would have attented a course
for his Masters degree would not be allowed to attend it again for
his Ph.D. programme, unless the course is divided for the students
of the two levels to avoid for Ph.D. students a mere repetition
of the course already attended at the Masters degree level.
I*
Case postale 6128, Succursale "A"
Montréal, P.Q., H3C 3J7
?
...2

 
/2
?
.
In fact, a division of two groups in
.a sufficient number of courses
will be necessary to ensure that Ph.D. students have a sufficient
choice between a number of subjects. Another way to provide
sufficient choice without duplicating too many groups for small
numbers of students may be to include a more substantial amount
of individually supervised work (such as Crim. 871, 895, 896) in the
Ph.D. programme. This may be a way to ensure that Ph.D. students
be offered a programme that is really distinct from the Masters programme,
that provides them with sufficient choice between various subjects,
and that can be administered with a minimum of group fractionning
(which can be costly in terms of staff resource allocation). In any
case, my observations on the programme take for granted that the
Department can administer it so as to provide Ph.D. students both
with sufficient choice between subjects and a sufficient number of
courses reserved to them.
In addition to this observation, I would have a question concerning
the number of credits which some students would have to complete.
I note that students who already hold a Masters degree in criminology
have to go through what I would call the " regular " programme
(two specialty and three additional courses, totalizing 15 credit
hours). Other students, i.e. those holding a B.A. in criminology
or a Masters degree in another discipline, also have to complete
a " preparatory " programme of 17 credit hours. However, they
are dispensed with one of the three additional courses which are
part of the " regular " 15 credit hour programme for students holding
a Masters degree in criminology. The programme which those students
have to complete in addition to the 17 preparatory credit hours therefore
includes only 12 credit hours instead of 15. Might this not suggest
that, in terms of Ph.D. level courses, the requirements would be
lesser for those students whose initial preparation in criminology
is already weaker? Should not all students go through the same
number of courses of Ph.D. level (what I called the " regular
programme), irrespective of their individual backgrounds? The
17 credit hours for students without a Masters degree in criminology
could then be viewed for what they really are, i.e. a preparatory
programme to initiate a student to criminology before he can enter
the regular Ph.D. programme. One further advantage of this
formula might be to make it far less necessary to have special
Ph.D. level courses for the preparatory programme I would see no
real objection to having courses of the level of Masters degree
in a preparatory programme (whereas I think that the inclusion
of courses of that level in the " regular " Ph.D. level programme
raises more delicate issues).
0

 
/3
S
.
Admission requirements
I note that under exceptional circumstances persons with a B.A. in
criminology could be admitted to the Ph.D. programme. This provision
follows section 1.3.3 of the graduate studies general regulations and,
therefore, would not be unique to the criminology programme. I also
note that special care is provided for revieving the status of
such students after a while. However, I am not sure that I would
support this provision woleheartedly.
?
The elimination of a student
from a Ph.D. programme is a gesture which is never done easily and
often creates conscience problems for the teaching staff; I have
seen such eliminations unduly delayed for reasons of this kind.
I would find it difficult to assess the research abilities of a candi-
date from his work at the undergraduate level. Furthermore,
however limited it may be, the research experience provided by a
Masters thesis may not be superfluous before undertaking a major
research venture such as a Ph.D. Perhaps the experience gained so
far in other programmes bySimon Fraser University does not confirm
my fears in that respect. And I assume that, if this provision is
adopted, the Department will exert great care in selecting those
exceptional students. In any case, I thought I had to raise the question.
Academic expertise
I have no reservation concrning the availability of academic exper-
tise. The Department of Criminology of Simon Fraser University has
succeeded in building itself an excellent reputation in very little
time. Its staff includes some of the finest criminologists in Canada..
A solid research infra-structure and staff have already shown their
productivity in authoritative research work, which is one of the best
guarantees for the success of the proposed programme.
Comparison with other institutions
The content of the proposd programme is quite comparable with those
offered by leading North merican institutions in the field of
criminology. Given the epertise and research involvement of the
staff, I have no doubt that graduates of the programme should be of
quality comparable to those produced by other leading institutions.

 
a
Need for graduates
The proposal includes an assessment of the need for graduates which seems
realistic to me. Although criminology can be approached through
such disciplines as sociology, criminology or law, there definitely
is a need for a doctoral programme in criminology in an anglophone
Canadian university. I know from personal experience how difficult
it is for some government departments to recruit well trained
research manpower. Growing scarcity of resources is leading
departments and agencies to question and evaluate their policies
and programmes more than before. Furthermore, I think that, with
time, Ph.D. graduates are likely to replace gradually other people in
teaching positions outside universities (particularly at college level).
Hence the need for qualified staff. In my experience, graduates from
similar programmes have tended to be relatively mobile on the labour
marked, so that I would view this need as a continuing one rather
than a tempory one.
A programme located at Simon Fraser University might be likely to
attract primarily students from the western part of the country.
However, the fact that it would be the sole programme of its kind
in an English-speaking Canadian university as well as the reputation
of the Department would certainly attract interesting students,
both from elsewhere in Canada and outside the country.
In brief, I think that the proposed programme is likely to meet the
objectives assigned to a Ph.D. programme in criminology. It would
meet real needs. And Simon Fraser University has the expertise to
support it.Therefore, I would recommend its approval by the
University. The above observations and suggestions should not be
viewed as conditioning my recommendatjion, but rather as expressing
questions and concerns which I thought might be of interest to you.
I hope that these comments will be helpful and I remain
Yours sincerely,
/&^'
Jean Trépanier
4c"^
El

 
CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER
Sam Houston State University
Huntsville, Texas
77341
(409) 294_1633
r
May 18, 1984
Mr. John M. Webster
Associate Vice President
Academic and Dean of Graduate Studies
Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, British Columbia
Canada, V5A1S6
Dear Vice President Webster:
As requested, I have reviewed the Ph.D. program submitted by the Department of
Criminology and I wish to share with you the following observations and comments:
(A) Strengths of the program
1)
The Criminology P-ogram at Simon Fraser University enjoys a
sound academic reputation in both Canada and the United States.
I base this observation on several criteria. Over the past few
years I have heard repective colleagues in the United States laud
the program both in terms of the quality of Masters students it
has recruited and the quality of faculty publications.
Also I have been to Canada several times over the last few
years and have heard high praise of the program from a number
of middle and upper managers within Canadian criminal justice
agencies.
The sound reputation the program enjoys for both academic
excellence and research activity is an excellent basis for giving
serious consideration for the development of a Ph.D. program in
criminology.
2)
After reviewing dhe vitae that you sent it would appear that
the department has dne a fine job in recruiting a diverse faculty
well capable of offering students a rich mixture of different
academic interests and research experiences. There appears to be
a healthy diversity Within the faculty with respect to a number
of criteria including:
o The quality arid geographic diversity of the degree
granting institutions from which the faculty gradu4ted.
o Areas of academic concentration at both undergraduate
10
?
and graduate levels.

 
Mr. John M. Webster
Page Two
o Previous academic appointments.
o Mixture of both academic and operational experience.
o Breath of research interests and publications.
3)
An active and creative research environment is a critical ingre-
dient in the development of a sound Ph.D. program. The Department
is particularly sound in this regard given the successful develop-
ment over a relatively short period of time of the Criminological
Research Centre and The Institute for Studies in Criminal Justice
Policy. I am particularly impressed by the number of research
projects that the department has undertaken over the past few
years, the heavy involvement of both faculty and students, and the
diversity of funding sources that have been identified to help
bear the costs of these research efforts. The Institute and the
Centre provide an excellent laboratory for Ph.D. students to gain
research experience and the contracts secured by both programs
should be of great assistance in underwriting the cost of research
fellowships and internships.
4)
Another strength of the program is that it will be the only
English language Ph.D. program in Criminology in Canada. The
surveys conducted by the Department seem to indicate a strong need
for such a program and I would imagine that it would also draw
students from the western part of the United States. It would
appear that the need is strong and the Department should not have
difficulty in recruiting qualified students for the proposed
program.
(B) Comments and Suggestions
1) Course Hours. The proposed program offers three tracts for
incoming students: students with a Master's Degree in Criminology,
students with a Master's Degree in a related field, and exceptional
students with only a Bachelor's Degree.
The proposal would require entering students with a Master's
Degree in Criminology to take only five courses in the Ph.D. program;
two speciality courses from the core curriculum and three additional
courses which could include invidiaully directed readings.
By American standards, this is a very minimal requirement in a
Ph.D. program. I have attached a survey recently completed by a
colleague of mine which compares the doctoral requirements of the
seven Ph.D. programs in the United States in Criminology/Criminal
Justice. As you can see from Table B, American institutions require
anywhere from twenty-four semester hours of course work to as many
as 72 semester hours. This represents minimum course requirements,
not maximum requirements. ?
is
.

 
I
?
I ?
b-
Mr. John M. Webster
Page Three
I recognize that tiere are fundamental differences between
the philosophy of approach in American Ph.D. programs versus
English/European progrms. In the American system, considerable
emphasis is given to cpurse work while in the English/European
tradition more emphasi is given to individual reading and the
development of the doctoral thesis. I assume, therefore, that
the requirement of five courses in the proposed Ph.D. program
reflects an English/European approach to doctoral education
and should be judged acordingly.
However, the surveys conducted by the Department indicate
that graduates of the program will be primarily eniployed as
teachers in undergraduate and graduate programs in Criminology
or Criminal Justice or individuals returning to civil service
positions in Canadian criminal justice agencies. It has been my
own experience that individuals seeking careers in these two
areas are sometimes better served by a diverse education than
a specialized one in which most of their doctoral experience has
been in a single area of research. It is not my intent to criti-
cize the English/European approach to doctoral education, but
the Department may want to consider expanding the number and
diversity of required doctoral courses as it gains experience
and feedback from its graduates.
• ?
2) The Department proposes eleven courses at the doctoral level
in five areas: Criminological Theory, Phenomena of Crime,
Criminal Justice Policy Analysis, Law and Social Control, and
Research Methods.
In my opinion, the' proposed schedule of courses covers the
obvious areas of inquiry in the field of criminology with one
exception. There is no specific course that addresses the admini-
stration of justice, namely, the operation of police, courts and
corrections. To some extent this topic is included tangentially
in the description of some of the proposed courses, specifically
Criminology 821; Criminal Justice Planning and Program Evaluation.
It is my view that some understanding of the sociology of police,
courts, and corrections and the administration of justice is
critical in a doctoral curriculum on Criminology. The Department
may want to consider at some future date the inclusion of such an
overview course which assures that sutdents have a thorough under-
standing of the organization, administration, and processes of
the criminal justice system.
3) Comprehensive Examinations. The proposed program requires each
candidate to write a comprehensive examination in three of the five
core areas, the areas to be determined in consultation with the
students supervisory committee.

 
Mr. John M. Webster
Page Four
Since the proposed program gives primary emphasis to doctoral
research vis-a-vis course work, the Department may want to con-
sider requiring all students to write comprehensive examinations
in the research area regardless of their particular specialty
within the core curriculum. This would assure that all students,
regardless of their area of research interest, have demonstrated
proficiency in research methodology, statistics, and related
subjects. In our own program, we allow students to concentrate
in three different areas: research, administration and theory,
but all students are required to take comprehensive examinations
in research methodology. This approach has worked well, and gives
us assurance that all graduates are competent in basic research
skills.
4)
Language Requirement. Traditionally, American doctoral programs
require students to show proficiency in either a foreign language or
computer language, as can be seen in Table G of the attached survey.
Four of seven require either a foreign language or proficiency in
computer science.
I recognize that Canada is a bi-lingual country and that many if
not all your doctoral candidates have bi-lingual skills. However,
the Department may want to consider a requirement that students
demonstrate minimal proficiency with statistical software packages.
Again, if the emphasis of the program is on doctoral research, pro-
viding students an opportunity to develop proficiency with various
computerized statistical packages might be a very good investment.
We require all students to either take a comprehensive exam in a
foreign language or complete two three-hour courses in the use of
statistical packages. Most opt for the statistical requirement
which proves very helpful in the conduct of their doctoral research.
5)
Oral Examination. We require all students to pass an oral
examination within sixty days of passing the written comprehensives.
Although this may sound like a redundant requirement, we find that
oral and written examinations provide two very different and useful
measures of the students academic performance. The oral examination
normally lasts for two hours and provides the faculty useful insight
into the students ability to converse intelligently on topics in
his field and to defend his positions.
As the Department gains experience with doctoral education,
they may want to consider the inclusion of an oral comprehensive
examination. We have found it extremely useful in guiding the
development of our own students and, in addition to the written
examination, assures that our students are competent both in written
and oral expression.
.
0

 
Mr. John M. Webster
Page Five
(C) Summary and Recommendation
Being somewhat personally familiar with the criminology
program at Simon Fraser, I strongly endorse the Departments'
application for a Ph.b. program. ?
They have a sound faculty
and a good reputation for academic excellence. There is a
strong interest in research on the part of the faculty which
has found enthusiastic financial support within the Canadian
criminal justice community.
I have included various materials that may be helpful to
you and to the Department in the development of the Ph.D.
program. As I mentioned before, I have included a summary of the
results of a summary we conducted of the seven Ph.D. programs in
Criminology/Criminal Justice in the United States. The results
are summarized in Tables.A - M. I have also included a copy
of our doctoral handbook which sets forth the requirements and
policies associated with our Ph.D. program in criminal justice.
In addition, I have included various other brochures and handouts
which describe our program.
I hope that these few comments and suggestions are helpful. I endorse the
• ?
proposal for the Ph.D. program, and if I can be of any further assistance, I
hope that you will not hesitate to call.
ce li,
Charle M. Friel
CMF:mj
Enclosures
-
.

Back to top