1. MEMORANDUM
  1. SiMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
      1. MEMORANDUM

SiMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
?
S.'34S
MEMORANDUM
From...... ?
.P
9fT. ?
BOARt
Sub
jed.........POLICY ON ADMISSION
X
?
Date...... ?
.3•9,• .]3
INDEPENDENT
SCHOOLS
Action undertaken by the Senate Undergraduate Admissions Board at
its meeting of July 14, 1983 gives rise to the following motions:
"That Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board
of Governors, as set forth in S.83-65
MOTION 1 - 'That for purposes of uhdërgraduate admissionsT,
the University accept applicants from all
independent schools which adhere to the British
Columbia High School Curriculum, subject to the
same conditions as apply to applicants from
British Columbia public schools'
MOTION 2 - 'That the University consider applicants from
independent schools in other Canadian provinces
10 ?
requirements
if the applicant meets the admission
requirements of the leading university in that
province'
MOTION 3 - 'That the SUAB in Spring semester 1986 review
the academic performances of students from
independent schools to evaluate the effect of
the above policies'
MOTION 4 - 'That above policy changes become effective for
applicants for 1984 and subsequently"
The above action modifies actions taken by Senate in February, 1983
under S.83-16 revised.
Motion 1 does not supercede the quota regulations on international
students, whether entering from British Columbia public or private schools.

Back to top


SiMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
MEMORANDUM
TO
.............
0m..
SE ?
BOPD
subject ........
ADM
At the February meeting of Senate the following motion was approved
and subsequently approved by the Board of Governors:
"That Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board
of Governors, as set forth in S.83-16 Revised
?
-
'That for admission from a Private HighSchooi, Simon -.
Fraser University consider only those qualified applicants
from B.C. Private High. Schools granted Group II status
under the Ministry of Education guidelines (including
equivalents in other Canadian Provinces and Territories).
Where a school chooses to remain outside the Ministry of
Education guidelines for Group II status, for reasons
other than academic, the Senate Undergraduate Admissions
Board may grant that school a waiver.'
That this policy become effective for applicants in
1984 and subsequently."
This measure was adopted for the purpose of ensuring that academic
standards of entrants from private schools would be consistent with those
entering from public schools. There was concern over the possible
proliferation of new private high schools, recruiting students mainly from
overseas. The University had established no standards by which to evaluate
such new schools.
A number of difficulties have arisen over the implementation of the
new policy with the result that it would be impractical to implement the
policy in January 1984 as planned. Certain private schools do not wish to
apply for Category II status for other than academic reasons and hence have
appealed for waivers. The University has therefore been placed in the
position of virtually accrediting such schools by granting a waiver or denying
the school a waiver on potentially inadequate grounds. The University is not
equipped to establish an accreditation process for independent schools. Such
a process would require significant resources.
Other recently adopted policies will also have a mitigating affect
in respect of the Private High School policy. Firstly, the total number -
of international students has been limited by the quota adopted by Senate and
effective September 1983. ?
Secondly, for international students those with
. ?
inadequate or marginal ability
in
English will be screened and assisted by the
new ESL test and remedial program. Lastly, the new continuance policy will
have the affect of removing the poorly-prepared student in a shorter time than
previously.

-2-
?
01
A full comparative evaluation of the performance of students from
independent schools cannot be carried out before adequate data has been
collected. This will require that students from independent schools entering
Simon Fraser University in Spring 1984 be allowed two years to establish
an academic record for evaluation. This would normally take the student
half way through a degree program, i.e. to the 60th semester hour.
Independent schools elsewhere in Canada will most likely not be
adhering to the B.C. Curriculum. It has been the practice of the
Registrar's Office to accept students from such schools if they met the
entrance requirements of the most prominent university in that province.
Therefore students from an independent school in Ontario should meet the
published entrance requirements of the University of Toronto and those from
independent schools in Alberta should meet the requirements of the University
of Alberta. This approach is pragmatic but is necessitated by the additional
problems encountered in attempting to evaluate or accredit institutions outside
this Province.
The proposed policy is consistent with the policies of the University
of British Columbia and the University of Victoria, except that international
students attending UBC may not be admitted on transfer from another Canadian
institution.
Implementation for January, 1984 of the revised policies set out
?
10
in the motion sheet is not expected to pose any additional difficulties.
S

Back to top