1. Page 1
    2. Page 2
    3. Page 3
    4. Page 4
    5. Page 5

 
/ ?
SiMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
?
2.214-61
MEMORANDUM
To
..........
..............................................
SENATE
Graduate Curriculum Changes -
Subject. ?
of -
4cj;jon
.......................
From.
01f
? .f. .tti ?
.Q
?
.
S.vcLp
Date.. . .
P.cP.kZ . 1.
f
t,. A94............................
Action undertaken by the Executive Committee, Senate Graduate Studies Committee,
at its meeting on October 15, 1984, gives rise to the following motion:-
MOTION:
"That Senate approve and recommed approval to the Board
of Governors, as set forth in S.84-61
?
the proposed
graduate curriculum changes in the Fidiilty of Education:
j) New graduate course - Educ 828-5 Instructional Practices
In Reading
ii) Deletion of Educ 827-5 Diagnosis and Remediation of Reading
Difficulties
Course changes for Educ 870-5, 871-5 and 874-3:
• ?
iii) Educ 870-5 Name Change Only
From: Introduction to School Counselling Psychology
To: ?
Theories of Counselling
iv) Educ 871-5 Name Change and Addition of Prerequisite Only
From: Studies in Family - School Interaction
Prerequisites: None
To:
?
Family Counselling
Prerequisites: Educ 811-5: Field Work 1, or consent
of the Instructor
V
)
Educ 874-3 Addition of prerequisite Only
Name: Counselling Skills & Strategies
Prerequisite: Consent of Instructor"
.M. Webste
Dean of Graduate Studies
mm/

 
?
I
-S ?
I ?
'
II -i-
?
SEp
?
L ?
4i
1 = ?
JLr V
C3 F
=
?
-
r
i
C3 P4
.
M
FEE
M C3 F(f.JDLJI'1
TO: Marian McGinn ?
FROM: Jaap Tuinman
Assistant Registrar ?
Acting Dean
Graduate Studies ?
Faculty of Education
SUBJECT: ?
DATE: September 25, 1984
For your information, the Faculty of Education at it meeting on
September 24th approved the enclosed new course proposal EDUC 828-5
(Instructional practices in reading), the deletion of EDUC 827-5
(Diagnosis and remediation of reading difficulties), and course
changes for EDUC 870-5, 871-5 and 874-3 as described in the attached
doc-umen-ts_FE
849_andEE_84-10._________________________________________
Please include these items on the agenda of the next meeting of the
Senate Graduate Studies Committee.
SiMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
o
MIMORANDUM_
To .
JaapTuinman ?
....... .From............ayPearson
4 IM
Actfng Dean
?
Program Assistant
..... ....................................
.
Faculty of Education
Sub1.ct ........... c.QVRS..
?
P.QS.AII..S............'•
?
.......
?
.
194
....................
-
uca oifj
In Ron's absence I would like to submit tjattached ce prøposaT
form as an agenda item fort!m Sptem5er meeting of the Executive Committee
and then on to the next Faculty meeting. Details of the course proposal
form are as follows:
New Course Proposal - Educ. 828-5
This course will replace Educ.827-5 and is scheduled for offering in
Spring 1985.
Rationale:
The two faculty members who specialize in reading believe that a focus
on instructional practices and materials for classroom teachers Is of greater
relevance and use to larger numbers of teachers and students than is a focus
• ?
on remediating reading difficulties. Thecoursewould also be of relevance
to students in the general curriculum and instruction area, English as a
second language and learning disabilities. In addition, the course would be
useful to students in the extended studies diploma program.
Please let me know if you have any queries.

 
JIMUN )'RASL'R uNIvr,R;1TY
?
Ne. ?
Course Proposal !i
?
Form ( . 8
A Li N PA I I N) ORMAT I ON
I :
?
Education
?
Course Number:
Instructional Practices in Reading
Description:- The history of reading materials and methods will be discussed, and
past and present instructional practices in reading evaluated in terms of
state-of-the-art knowledge of instructional research; methods of analyzing
reading materials will be critiqued.
Credit Hours: ?
5 ?
Vector: ?
Prerequisite(s) if any:
?
826
2.
ENROLLMENT AND SCHEDULING:
L:;timaled Enrollment:_ ?
10 ?
When will the course first he offered: January l98S
tw 'if
tc.ri
will tilt.
COUX"P
be offered: ?
once per year
J. JtJ5I'I I I
CAT1 ON:
This course represents a change in emphasis in our program in reading because of a
"
Ti
minished emphasis on diagnostic practices and an increased empflaSIS on classroom
instructional practices. The new course will serve a larger variety of interests of
-
students in the reading program as well as
students In our
pruurdIIus
111
curriculum and
instruction, English asa second language and learning disabilities. Accordingly,
Educ. 827 will be deleted.
4. R,150tJR(' I
Which 1icu1ty member will normally teach the course:
?
J. Tuinman or J. Kendall
WIi..t •ir
th.'
hudgi'tary implications of mounting the course:
none - ED 827 will be deleted
Are there sufficient Library resources (append details):
Appended: a) Outline of the Course
b)
An indication of the competence of the Faculty member to give the course
c)
Library resources
Approved: Departmenta1)raduate Studies Comm i
ttee: ?
Date _If
Faculty Crauate Studies Committee:
?
Date ?
-
?
-
Faculty:
?
te
;inate
'riate:
(Iraduare Studies Committ
?
i1
?
Date
?
-

 
p
Education 828: Instructional Practices in Reading
Rationale: Outstanding classroom teachers must be knowledgeable about
and able to analyze critically past and present instruc-
tional practices in reading and various reading methods
and materials.
Objectives:
1. Students will be knowledgeable about the history of
reading methods and materials.
_2. Students ii1
.
bc
acquainted with• cf•fccti••'.'c instructional
practices in reading and familiar with research examin-
ing these practices.
3.
Students will evaluate methods of analyzing reading
materials.
Topics: ?
Over 12 weeks the following areas will be covered:
. ?
- History of reading methods and materials
- Instructional practices in word recognition.
- Instructional practices in comprehension
- Methods of analyzing reading materials.
Assignments:
1.
Paper describing the elements of an "effective instruc-
tional practice" in reading and critically evaluating
this practice.
2.
Paper presenting the analysis of a reading program
carried out with a particular method and then critically
evaluating the analysis.
0

 
RATIONALE FOR THE PROPOSED COURSE CHANGES IN THE COUNSELLING EMPHASIS
(Educ. 870, 871, 874)
These proposed changes are intended to make more clear the actual prac-
tices in our counselling emphasis. With Educ. 870 and Educ. 871 the change
in name will more accurately describe the course content and with Educ. 874
the additional prerequisite will help to prevent administrative problems with
the course.
The focus in our counselling emphasis has evolved to one which emphasizes
counselling in a generic sense. Our students initially study a substantive
body of knowledge that is common to various counselling applications, and
acquire a repertoire of generic skills that are appropriate for a wide variety
of counselling settings. At the end of their program, they specialize in
certain counselling applications,e.g.,, vocational counselling, family
counselling, etc. Thus Educ. 870 has become a course in counselling theory,
broadly construed, rather than a course which focused only on school counsel-
ling. The proposed change in name will more accurately convey the actual
content covered in this course. A similar situation exists with Educ. 871.
Family-school interactions are viewed as a subset of family interactions per
Se. The focus In this course has been to address family interventions on a
broad plane, rather than focus on only those parts of a problem that affect
the school directly, i.e., school problems are viewed within a larger,more
complete, problem context. Thus, Educ. 871 has been taught for the past 5
years as a course in family counselling, where the focus is on the family,
rather than only that small part of the family's Interaction that concerns the
school directly. The change in name will portray more accurately the actual
course content.
In Educ. 874 the instructional format consists of a 3 day residential
workshop at the beginning of the course, followed by regular class meetings.
In order to make plans for the workshop, it is necessary to know ahead of time
who is planning to take the course. Currently, we rely on informal communica-
tion channels to make sure the students know about the format of this course
and make the necessary time arrangements to accommodate the workshop portion
of the course. Requiring consent of the instructor would make sure that no
slip-ups occur and that people are well informed about the special instructional
arrangements in this course.
0

Back to top