1. Page 1
    2. Page 2
    3. Page 3
    4. Page 4
    5. Page 5
    6. Page 6
    7. Page 7
    8. Page 8
    9. Page 9

 
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
'54
c?L,1!
MEMORANDUM
To: Senate
?
From: Senate Committee on
Undergraduate Studies
Subject:
Faculty of Education -
?
Date:
October 1. 1986
Curriculum Revisions
Action undertaken by the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies at its
meeting of September 30, 1986 gives rise to the following motions:
"That Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board
of Governors, as set forth in S.86-
7i,
the proposed
New course EDUC 350-3 Instructional Programs for Diverse
.
?
Settings"
"That Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board
of Governors, as set forth in S.86-
71,
the proposed
New courses EDUC 485 - 3, 4 or 6 Special Topics
EDUC 497 - 3, 4 or 6 Special Topics
EDUC 498 - 3, 4 or 6 Special Topics"
Subject to the approval by Senate and the Board of Governors the Senate
Committee on Undergraduate Studies approved waiver of the normal two-
semester time lag requirement to permit first offering of these course in Spring
87-I.
FOR INFORMATION:
Acting under delegated authority at its meeting of September 30, 1986 the Senate
Committee on Undergraduate Studies approved
. Change of credits for EDUC 486
EDUC 487
EDUC 488
EDUC 495
EDUC 496
Special Topics from 4 to 3, 4 or 6
Special Topics from 4 to 3, 4 or 6
Special Topics from 4 to 3, 4 or 6
Special Topics from 6 to 3, 4 or 6
Special Topics from 3 to 3, 4 or 6

 
the Senate
Please include them o
Committee on Undergi
Enclosures
cc: Stan Kanehara
S
Svs
IkON PIASIR WIIYDITY
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ron Heath
?
FROM: Stan Shapson
Registrar
?
Acting Dean of Education
SUBJECT:
?
DATE: 1986-07-03
For your information, the Faculty of Education at its meeting on June 23,
1986 approved the New Course Proposal: EDUC 350-3 Instructional Programs
for Diverse Settings and changes of numbers to the special topics courses as
described in the attached documents.

 
ean
^^^^^
Chairman, SCUS
r,
Date
SENATE COMMITTEE ON UNDERGRADUATE STUDI?
ES
NE COURSE PROPOSAL FORM
Calendar 1niornation ?
. ?
Dtpartmcnt:__Education
Abbreviation Code: EDUC. Course Number:
350 ?
Credit Hours: 3
?
Vector:
2"1-0
Title of Course: Instructional Programs for Diverse Settings
Calendar Description of Course: An introduction to the design of instructional programs
for a variety of purposes and settings. The course is designed to be appropriate for
people for whom instruction is an important responsibility, including persons in industry,
government, and educational settings other than the public schools. During the course,
students will be involved in the application and practice of what they are learning, both
in classroom workshops and if possible in their instructional setting.
NaLure of Course lecture/seminar
Prerequisites (or special instructions):
60 hours of credit. This course will not count toward B.Ed. Degree or Education 404
requi rements.
What course (courses), if any, is being dropped from the calendar if this course i
s
• approved:
None
2. Scheduling
How frequently will the course be offered? twice per year
Semester in which the course will first be offered? 1987 Spring
• Which of your present faculty would be available to make the proposed offering
c
possible? Dr. Roger Gehlbach
• Objectives of the Course
?
0
I. Students will learn general principles in the design of instructional programs,
including (a) identification of goals, (b) crrganization of content-, (c) design of
instructional activities, (d) implementation, and (e) evaluation and revision.
2. Students will complete a prototypical instructional program.
4. Budgetary and Space Requirements (for information. only)
What additional resources will be required in the following areas:
Faculty ?
None
Staff
None
Library
?
Minor
Audio Visual
None
Space
None
Equipment
None
SCS 73-34b:-
(When completing this form,
for instructions
see
Memorandum SCUS
7334a.
Attach course outline).
?
.

 
Sample Course Outline
.
Education 350-3
Instructional Programs for Diverse Settings
Purpose:
The purpose of this course is to teach people for whom instruction is an
important responsibility (in educational settings outside of the public
schools) how to design and deliver an effective program.
Guidelines:
1.
This course is designed to be taught using the practises it teaches. It is
designed to occomoclete diverse learning styles, to lead to increasing
--
2.
During the course, students will be Involved in the application and
practice of whet they ore learning both in classroom workshops and in
their homebese teaching settings.
Program:
I. ?
Identification of Program Pur
p
oses and Goals
A.
Resources: Readings, lecture, personal experience.
B.
Learning Activities
Direct Instruction: Students wil consider the problems
involved in designing instructional programs. The moth
problem examined will be how to analyze the situation in
order to determine the purposes of the instructional program.
It will include such general issues as needs assessment,
accommodating diversity among clients and differences in
goal-setting authority.
Experiential Worksho p
: Students will examine their own and
sample situations to derive purposes and goals.
Smell Grouos: Using readings, lecture material and their own
experiences, students will work in groups to learn to identify
differences among venous references for program goals,
0

 
ranging from external prescriptions to assessments of user
needs.
- ?
A
Individual: Each student
will select
a general objective
for
an
in-course instructional project.
C.
Settin g
: Classroom
D.
Instructor Role: Lecture, management of group learning.
II.
?
Desi g
nin g General Prog
ram Structure
A.
Resources: Readings, lecture, personal experience.
B.
Learning
activities
• ?
Direct Instruction: The
instructor will introduce the range of
designs available for fulfilling various purposes for different
kinds of students. And students will learn the methods for
?
creating such designs.
ExDeriential Worksho
p
: Students will work in groups to solve
design problems.
Small Grou
p s: Students
will identify a common purpose and
develop
a
program design to achieve it.
Individual: Students will make decisions about the structure of
their own instructional projects.
C.
Setting : Classroom
D.
Instructor role: Lecture, management of group learning.
III.
Or g anization
of Pro
gram
Content
A.
Resources: Individual source materials, lecture.
B.
Learnin g
activities:
.
S
S

 
Direct Instruction: Students will consider the interaction
between the "natural" organization of subject matter and the
specific re-organization of it (e.g., goals, objectives, and the
scope and sequence of topics) for instructional purposes.
Ex p
eriential Workshotr Students will develop and organize goals
and topics for assigned situations.
Individual: Students will complete preliminary statements of
program learning objectives and topic sequences for their
course projects.
• Small groups: Students will present for feedback the content
outlines of their individual programs, and will develop their
__groupproject -
- ?
-. ?
-- ---- -- -•-- -
IV.
?
Desi g
nine Instructional Activities
A.
Resources: Readings, lecture, personal experience.
B.
Learnin
g
Activities:
Direct Instruction: Students will consider the dynamics of the
interaction among student, teacher and learning environment in
the determination of learning outcomes. A variety of
instructional modes will be presented and analyzed, including
(a) direct instruction, (b) self-instruction, (c) small-group
learning, (d) experiential learning, and (e) technological
prosthetics.
Experiential Workshop: Students will practice the skills involved
-
?
in each
of the instructional modes using such approaches as role
playing, simulation, VTR playback, and micro-teaching.
- Individual: Students will consider their individual projects to
determine the scope and sequence of activities they will use to
achieve their objectives.
Small Grou p
: Students will present for feedback their
instructional activity plans for their in-course projects.
C.
Settin g
: Classroom and individual-field sites.

 
D.
?
Instructor role: Lecture, management of individual and group
learning, facilitation of self-education.
.,
?
4
V.
?
Field Develo p
ment. Evaluation, and Improvement
A.
Resources: Readings, lecture, field work.
B.
Learnin
g
activities:
Direct Instruction: Students will consider major problems in
the early field testing of programs, including logistics, data
generation, program validity and evaluation methods.
Experiential Worksho
p
: Students will design approaches to the
formative evaluation of
-
a program, and to the design of
program improvements where indicated.
Individual: Students will rough-out
their plans for field
development of their own projects and complete preliminary
site identification.
Small groups: Students will present for feedback their field
development plans.
C.
Setting: Classroom, individual field sites.
D.
Instructor role: Lecture, mangagement of group and individual
learning, facilitation of individual initiative and problem
solving.
III. Revision and Implementation
A.
?
Resources: Readings, lecture, individual project evaluations.
'I
.
B. ?
Direct Instruction: Students
will
consider some of the findings
of research on innovation, implementation and institutional
change.
?
.

 
C.
Fxneri p
nti&
Workshnn: Students will devise solutions to
implementation problems.
D.
Individual: Students will plan the evaluation-based
revisions and strategies for implementation of working
models of their course projects.
E.
Smell Grou
p
: Students will present for feedback their
ideas regarding the future implications of their own
projects and the teem project.
Di bi I ogpjy
Bloom, ft(Eci.) (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York:
-__D&iMcKo.
?
- ---------
de Bono,E. (1954). The direct teaching of thinking as o skill. Phi Delta
K a ppan 64. 703-708.
Good, T. & Brophy, J. (1978). Looking in classrooms. New York: Harper & Row.
Gross, Ronald. (1977) The lifelong learner. New York: Simon and Shuster.
Hirst, Paul H. (1974) Knowledge and the curriculum. London: R.K.P.
Johnson & Johnson. Circles of learning: Coo
p
eration in the classroom.
• ?
Joyce, B. & Weil, M. Models of teaching. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hell.
?
Kidd, J. R. (1973) How adults learn. New York Associated Press.
Knowles, Malcolm. (1973) The adult leorning: A
ne
g
lected species. Houston
Gulf Publishing Company.
McCarthy,
B. The 4-Met
instructional system: Teaching to leorning.tji
?
?
with left/right mode techniq
ues
. Arlington Hghts,IL.: Excel Inc.
McPeck, John E. (1961). Critical thinking and education. Oxford: Martin
Robertson.
Phenix, P. (1964). Realms of meaning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Romiszowski, P. Designing an Instructional System.
Slevin, R. (1963). Coo
p
erative learning. New York: Longman
Smith, Robert M. Learning how to learn: Aplied theory for adults. New
?
York, Cambridge, The Adult Education Company.
Tough, Allen M. (1979).The adult's leorningj
.
Qjects. (2nd edition).
Austin, Texas, Learning Concepts.
von Oech. A whack on the side of the heed.
Welter, G. & Marks, W. (1981). Experiential learning and chang
e . New York:
Wiley.
0

 
EDUCATION SPECIAL TOPICS COURSES
Proposal
For administrative reasons, more special topics course numbers are required. (There are no anticipated
academic consequences of this change).
1. To add additional Special Topics Education course numbers without changing the current maximum
number of semester hours of credit in Education Special Topics courseswhich may be used twoard a
Bachelor of Education degree.
1. To add variable credit hours (3,4 or 6) for each special topics course number.
Rationale
Current conditions and changing needs in the field, are being met effectively through a variety of short
term special topics education course offerings. However, it is also important that the general course
content be identified on the students records, and to do so requires individual course numbers for each
topic. In addition to clarifying the students record, duplications of content can be avoided.
As well, variable credit hours for each special topics course will give us maximum flexibility especially
for articulating interior offerings with the other two universities. Once a particular topic has been
assigned credit value this value will remain constant in subsequent offerings.
Current Calendar Entry
EDUC 496-4/487-4/488-4 Special Topics
EDUC 495-6/496-3 Special Topics
Sections will deal with major issues of present concern. Subjects to be discussed will be announced
during the semester prior to that in which the course is to be offered.
Prerequisite: Permission of Instructor or EDUC 401/402.
Note: A maximum of 12 semester hours of credit in Education Special Topics courses may be used toward a
Bachelor of Education degree.
Proposed Calendar Entry
EDUC 485-0,4 or 6)/486-(3,4 or 6)/487-(3.4 or 6)/488-(3,4 or 6)
Special Topics
EDUC 495-(3,4 or 6)/496-(3.4 or 6)/497-(3.4 or 6)/498-(3,4 or 6)
Special Topics
Sections will deal with major issues of present concern. Subjects to be discussed will be announced
during the semester prior to that in which the course is to be offered. The exact assignment of credit
hours (3,4 or 6) for the special topics offering will be announced prior to the beginning of each semester.
Prerequisite: Permission of Instructor or EDUC 401/402.
Note: A maximum of 12 semester hours of credit in Education Special Topics courses may be used toward a
Bachelor of Education degree.
11

Back to top