S .88-78
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Senate ?
FROM:
?
J.W.G. Ivany
Chair, SCAP
SUBJECT: MRM
Curriculum Revision
?
DATE: ?
Nov. 15, 1988
Action undertaken by the Senate Committee on Academic Planning/Senate
Graduate Studies Committee gives rise to the following motion:
Motion: ?
that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
Governors as set forth in S.88-78 a revision to the course
description for MRM 602-5
1O
SIMON F R A S E R UNIVERSITY
.
?
MEMORANDUM
NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
TO: Margaret Savage, Chair
FAS Grad. Studies
Committee
SUBJECT: Revisions to MRM 602
?
Description
FROM: Randall M. Peterman
Chair
NRM Program Grad Studies
Committee
DATE: 2 November, 1987
Kindly consider the following course description revisions for
MRM 602-5 at the next meeting of the FAS Graduate Studies Committee.
OLD DESCRIPTION
MRM 602-5. Natural Resources Management II: Advanced Seminar. A
review of selected policies, programs and problems related to natural
resources management; review and evaluation of student research.
Prerequisite: 6 required MRN courses or, permission of instructor.
NEW DESCRIPTION
MRN 602-5. Natural Resources Management II: Advanced Seminar.
A review of selected policies, programs, or institutions related to
natural resources management-
?
(Prerequisites:
8 required MRN courses or permission of instructor).
Randall M. Peterman
RMP/jr
0
New
Graduate Course Pronosal Form
COURSE REVISIONS
?
p
CALENDAR l;FORATION:
Department:
Natural
Resources Management Program
?
Course Number:
NW 602-5
Title:
Natural Resources Management II: Advanced Seminar
A review of selected policies, programs, or institutions related to
Description:
natural resources management
?
-
?
(Prerequisites: 8 required NRM
courses or permission of instructor.) -
5-0-0 ?
8 required
Credit Hours:
?
Vector: ?
_Prerequisite(s)
if an y
: MRM
courses
ENR0LL1ENT AND SCHEDULING:
Estinted Enrollment:
?
When will the course first be offered:
How often will the course be offered:
JUSTIFICATION:
This course is now being taught by .a full-time tenure-track faculty member who feels
the old description didnot mention institutional reviews. Six courses is too few
as a prerequisite -- 8 is a better policy.
I
vcriir'c.
Which Faculty me'.ber will normally teach the course:
What are the budgetary fpl1cations of mounting the course:
Are there sufficient Library resources (anoend details):
Appended:. a) Outline of the Course
b)
An indication of the com
p
etence of the Faculty member to give the course.
c)
Library resources
Approved: Departmental Graduate Studies Committee:
/Z_1ilE/1
__Date:'[ _
4i/i9
::: ?
•
Senate Graduate Studies Committee:
O
Senate: ?
Date:
