Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26

S.89-2

• ?

SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY

MEMORANDUM

To:

Senate

From: Senate Committee on

Academic Planning

Subject:

Task Force on University Size

pate: ?

December 15, 1988

SCAP, at its meeting of December 7, 1988, approved unanimously the recommendations

for limiting enrolments contained in the report "Task Force on University Size: A. Report

on Undergraduate Enrolment".

SCAP therefore recommends the following motion to Senate

MOTION:.

"That Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of

Governors, the set of recommendations contained in S. 89-2 ."

•1..

5cAe ?

.59

TASK FORCE ON UOVERSOTY SIIZE:

A REPORT ON

UNDERGRADUATE ENROLMENT

December, 1988

88-12-1

A REPORT OF THE ? 

TASK FORCE ON 

UNIVERSITY

SIZE 

?

ON UNDERGRADUATE ENROLMENT 

These recommendations represent a set of policies for the

University in the face of increasing demand by students for its

programs and constant or decreasing financial and space

resources. We believe it is regrettable that the University must

consider limiting undergraduate enrolment and we recognize that

any measures proposed to effect such limitation would raise

serious concerns.

General

That policies be developed for limiting enrolment based

upon available resources. Enrolment limits under such

policies are to be reviewed annually and recommended to

Senate and the Board of Governors. The University

Calendar shall inform potential students that any necessary

enrolment limits shall be met by adjustment of the Grade

Point Average (GPA) required for entry or, in the case of

applicants for whom the GPA calculation is not applicable,

by adjudication of the qualifications presented.

That policies for limiting enrolment shall be based on

academic achievement and potential, as determined by the

University.

C. ? 

University Enrolment 

1.

That, unless additional resources are made available and

until the University's operating grant support reflects actual

needs in the costs of operating the University, the

undergraduate head count enrolment in all semesters shall

• ?

0,

be controlled. An annual target shall be recommended to

• Senate by the Senate Committee on Academic Planning

(SCAP) in light of available resources. The target approved

by the Senate shall be recommended to the Board for

• approval. We believe, given the current level of resources,

this target should be a head-count enrolment of 11,500

students. Implementation of the recommended policies to

achieve this number should be phased in over three years.

2. The determination of head count enrolment for this purpose

shall include enrolment in the Directed Independent

Study

Course (DISC) program, at SFU Harbour Centre and in

other specially funded programs operated off-campus.

To implement this overall on-campus limitation, the

following specific measures shall be employed.

a) SFU shall consider the quotas in all student

admission categories (high school, college transfer,

international, mature, etc.) to ensure that each group

of students bears an. appropriate proportion of the

reduction in total enrolment and that there is

consistency between the standards applied to all

admission categories.

• • b) The high school grade point average required

enter the University

directly from B.C. high schools

will be set annually by the Admissions Office in light

of enrolment quotas set by SCAP and after

appropriate approvals as required under General

Regulation l.B.1.

The regulations governing the academic standing

required for continuance as a student should be

made more stringent. The changes should

concentrate on reducing the period of time in which

students with deficient GPA's may continue as

students. The authority of the Senate Appeals Board

to re-admit students who attain "Required to

Withdraw" or "Permanent Withdrawal" status is

normally restricted to those who produce evidence of

acceptable remedial steps taken subsequent to

withdrawal . (Note: Senate has already approved a

reduction in the time students with deficient GPA's

may continue by the elimination of the standing "On

Academic Warning" S88-39.)

• ?

d) ?

The cumulative grade point average required for

admission of students transferring from British

Columbia and the equivalent requirement for out-of-

province institutions are to be set annually by the

Admissions Office in light of enrolment quotas set by

SCAP and following appropriate approvals as

required under General Regulation l.B.1.

3. Understanding that global enrolment restrictions are not

sufficient in themselves, that the problems of distribution

among programs is also a major factor in overcrowding, the

Task Force further recommends the following practises:

Admission to Simon Fraser University shall be

formally to a Faculty of the University.

Admission to a Major is competitive and may require

other evidence of potential success than the GPA.

Formal approval for entry to Major, Honors or other

programs must be sought by all students who are

completing their 45th or greater semester hour of

study. (In some programs the norm may differ, e.g.

Engineering Science, or the Education Professional

Development Program (PDP). Such variations must

have Senate approval).

Students who continue beyond 45 semester hours

without an approved Major, Honors or other program

of study will cease to accumulate credit hour points

towards the determination of their Registration

Pnonty Number (RPN).

d) SCUS shall be directed to recommend to SCAP and

Senate a definition of RPN which better reflects the

overall intention that academic achievement will be

the primary criterion for restriction.

Departmental/Program Enrolments

1. That enrolment limitations for individual departments/

programs be considered when one or more of of the

following conditions prevail.

a) enrolment growth exceeds the department's/

program's ability to respond because of physical

space constraints, the inability of the University to

allocate more operating resources to the

department/program, or the inability of the

department/program to attract sufficient qualified

faculty;

b) undergraduate enrolment in the department/program

constitutes an excessive proportion of the

University's total undergraduate enrolment;

it is determined that the best interests of the

department/program and the University in

maintaining academic quality require that enrolment

be limited.

That policies for limiting departmental/program enrolments

be uniform across the University, recognizing that unique

situations may require special attention.

That the policy for limiting departmental/program

enrolments take the following form:

a) recommendation by the department/program, in

conjunction with the Faculty Dean, of the number of

students which it can accommodate in its honors,

major, minor and other programs, to SCAP.

.b)

establishment of a minimum cumulative GPA and/or

other criteria for consideration and/or acceptance

o into departmental programs. These criteria will be

set at a level which is expected to enrol the number

of students determined in a).

c) to remain in a department's program, the student

shall be expected to maintain a cumulative GPA at a

level to be determined at the time that the enrolment

limitation policy is established.

d) students who are not accepted into departmental

programs but who wish to take upper division

courses in the department, may be governed by a

minimum cumulative GPA required at the time they

wish to register in these courses.

Approval by Senate and Board of Governors would be

required in each case.

tiI[:I*1!It*1

1. That SCAP monitor closely the impact of enrolment

limitation measures and recommend appropriate changes,

as needed, to Senate for its consideration.

That TFUS examine and make recommendations to SCAP

on the expected growth

in Downtown and DISC enrolments

with a view to maximizing opportunities for students while

restricting on-campus registration to an appropriate

capacity.

That TFUS investigate and

report

to SCAP the effects of

raising the GPA required for maintaining active student

status and for graduation from the University.

That TFUS examine and

report

on the potential impact of

the proposed enrolment restrictions on the tutorial system

and on graduate student support.

That the University aggressively pursue the appropriate

resources to accommodate the current enrolment of 12,700.

In November.of 1982, following several years of study, the report

of the President's Committee on Enrolment Umitation (PCEL) (which had

been created in 1979), was approved by Senate (Paper S82-136). The

major feature of the recommendations approved was to set the overall

headcount limit for on-campus students at 11,000.

In September 1988 this enrolment quota was exceeded. In this

term Simon Fraser University registered 12,700 students, of whom

11,200 were on-campus, 850 were Distance Education students, 350

were registered at SFU Downtown, 200 in the Prison Program and the

remainder at a number of other off-campus sites. It has also become

abundantly clear to students, faculty and support staff alike that a critical

point has been reached, if not surpassed. The overall decline in capital

and operating resources during the period of restraint has rendered the

prediction of the 1982 report inoperative. Simon Fraser University can

no longer deliver quality instruction to an undergraduate student

population greater than 10,000, on-campus. The general outcry of alarm,

of concern for the deteriorating quality of the instructional environment,

had already led to the establishment of the Task Force on University Size

by President Saywell in October, 1987.

The shape of the current crisis is best described in a few

illustrative tables and graphs. These describe changes in student

numbers, faculty resources, space needs and operating budgets over the

recent years. All dramatically underscore the problems we face.

(Attachments 2 through 7).

The Task Force on University Size (TFUS) was struck as a sub-

committee of the Senate Committee on Academic Planning. Its original

membership was as follows:

Vice-President

George

Ivany, Chair

Associate Vice-President Ross Saunders

Dean Bob Brown

Dean Bruce Clayman

Associate Dean Bob Wyckham

Professor Liora Sailer

Senator Ray Irvine

Ron Heath, Registrar

Walter Wattamaniuk, Analytical Studies

The Task Force has been meeting, almost weekly since October 1987.

During that time period necessary personnel changes resulted in the

participation of Acting Dean Evan Alderson, Associate Dean Bill Wedley

and Senator Ron McGivern.. The mandate of the TFUS included making

proposals for a crisis response to control the 88-3 intake of

students, reporting to SCAP and Senate on procedures for long-term

management of enrolment and providing input to an initiative to

Government for incremental support for enrolment growth.

The Task Force called for, and received, briefs regarding its

mandate early in its deliberations. Recently a draft of this report was

circulated for information and input.

We recognize that a limit to the size of Simon Fraser University

may be driven as much by design as by resources. Some colleagues

would prefer a university smaller than 10,000 undergraduate students

regardless of resources, others claim that university size - at least within

the parameters available to us - is not a deterrent to quality instruction as

long as sufficient resources are available. We have not yet resolved this

debate and commend to the President that another forum may be

desirable for airing the alternate views. Our approach, therefore, has

been limited to attempting to maximize the opportunities for students to

study at Simon Fraser within the real constraints of available resources,

both people and capital. It seems essential that an enrolment restraint

model be dynamic, capable of reacting appropriately to changes in

student demand, (overall as well as within various categories), and to

changes in our resource base. Nevertheless for the immediate future,

without significant increments in available space and in operating budget

for instruction and support, we have passed the limits of our ability to

respond to student demand.

To effect enrolment limits, the TFUS reaffirms the criteria of

performance and potential set by the former President's Committee on

Enrolment Limitations and recommends a dynamic system of enrolment

limits based upon regular analyses of resources and demand.

Accordingly we have no option but to recommend:

That, unless additional resources are made available and

until the Unh,ersltg's operating grant support reflects

actual needs in the costs of operating the Universitg,

the undergraduate head count enrolment In all semesters

shall be controlled. Rn annual target shall be

resources.

We believe, given the current level of

resources, this target should be a headcount enrolment

of 11,500 students. implementation of the

phased In over three gears.

The Office of Analytical Studies has carried out a projection of the

implications of this measure for our steady-state size. These are

presented as attachments 8 and 9. These graphs show a slight decline

in the total fall enrolments to about the 1987 numbers with concomitant

new student intakes each fall just short of 2,600 students. Our

recommendations are:

The determination of head count enrolment for this

purpose shall include enrolment in the Directed

Independent Study Course program, at SF0 Harbour

Centre and in other specially funded programs operated

off-campus.

That policies be developed for limiting enrolment based

upon available resources. Enrolment limits under such

policies are to be reviewed annually and recommended

to Senate.

The Universltg Calendar shall Inform

potential students that any necessary

limits

shall be met by adjustment of the GPR required for

entry.

That policies for limiting enrolment be based on

academic echleuement and potential.

To implement this overall on-campus limitation, the

following specific measures shall be employed.

a) SURD shall consider the quotas In all student

admission categories (high school, college

transfer, International, mature, etc.) to ensure

that each group of students bears an appropriate

proportion of the reduction In total enrolment and

that there Is consistency between the standards

applied to all admission categories.

b) The high school grade point average required to

enter the University directly from B.C. high

schools will be set annually by the Admissions

Office in light of enrolment quotes set by SCAP

and after appropriate approvals as required under

General Regulation I.B.I.

The regulations governing the academic standing

required for continuance as a student should be

made more stringent. The changes should

concentrate on reducing the period of time in

which students with deficient SPAs may continue

as students. Normally, the authority of the Senate

Appeals Board to re-admit students who attain

Required to Withdraw

or oPermanent

Withdrawai n

status Is normally restricted to

those who produce euidencs of acceptable

remedial steps taken subsequent to withdrawal

The cumulative SPA required for admission of

students transferring from British Columbia and

• the equivalent requirement for out-of-province

Institutions are to be set annually by the

• Admissions Office In light of enrolment quotas set

• ?

by SCAP and following appropriate approvals as

required under General Regulation I.B.I.

vENROLMENT DISTRIBUTION

A major problem in controlling enrolment growth at Simon Fraser

University is that most undergraduate students are admitted to the

University without specification of program. Once enrolled, students can

maintain enrolment for up to sixty semester credit hours before declaring

a major in a particular program. Between admission and the sixty credit

hour point, students are free to explore across a wide variety of

disciplinary areas.

Declaration of a major is based on student choice --

subject to completion of departmental and university requirements and to

achievement of a high enough cumulative GPA for admission to some

programs.

Therefore, limitations on enrolment can most effectively be applied

either at the time of admission to the University or at the time a student is

•

being.considered for formal admission to a major, minor, honors, or other

program.'.

'Enrolment pressures are not limited to upper division courses nor

dothey:depend on the number of students applying to specialize in

• ?

particuthr program.

A department's lower division course offerings may

be affèctèd by enrolment pressures both from potential majors as well as

from sfüdents wishing or required to enrol in the course but with

interest in another discipline.

•

significant

If all enrolment limitations were imposed at the time of admission

to Simon Fraser University, the University would benefit from the

opportunity to develop and implement a more rational academic

planning and resource allocation process. However, an action this

drastic would deny students the opportunity to inquire in disciplines

foreign to their high school or college experience. Some attention must,

however, be paid to two factors: newly admitted students will not

distribute themselves evenly across all departments and not all

departments are equally able to accommodate current student numbers.

The problem of department-level enrolment limitations is addressed in

the next section of the report but understanding that global enrolment

restrictions are not sufficient in themselves, that the problems of

distribution among programs is also a major factor in overcrowding, the

Task Force further recommends the following practises:

Admission to Simon Fraser University shell be formally

to a Faculty of the University.

Admission to a Major Is competitive, and may require

other evidence of potential success than the SPA.

formal approval for entry to Major, Honors or other

programs must be sought by all students who are

completing their 45th or greeter semester hour of

study. (In some programs the norm may differ, e.g.

Engineering Science, or the Education PUP. Such

variations must have Senate approval).

Students who continue beyond 45 semester hours

without an approved Major, Honors or other program of

study will cease to accumulate credit hour points

towards the determination of their Registration Priority

Number (RPN).

SCUS shall be directed to recommend to SCRIP and Senate

a definition of RPN which better reflects the overall

intention that academic achievement will be the primary

criterion for restriction.

The issue of departmental growth was adequately addressed in

the PCEL report of 1982. It correctly identified a number of direct and

indirect constraints affecting departmental enrolments: "instructional

space, the quality of the program, the anticipated demand for graduates

of the program, the relative proportion of the University's enrolment which

should be in a particular program, the availability of qualified instructional

staff and desirable rates of enrolment growth." In addition there is the

additional problem that "student preferences for particular programs are

not static. They tend to shift over time in response to economic

conditions, job market opportunities and social trends." The report goes

on - "If institutional resources were easily re-allocated, the University

would have far fewer difficulties in responding to student program

demand. Because re-allocation is not easily achieved, particularly in

times of high inflation and tight operating and capital budgets, the

•1

prudent course of action is to ensure a reasonable allocation of

resources across all of the University's programs. Student demand and

the encouragement of proven or potential instructional and research

excellence in particular departments should influence the distribution of

University resources but not to the extent of creating future resource

imbalances between departments.

The report went on to recommend a system of departmental quota

setting which continues to be adequate and which already has Senate

•

approval. The Task Force on University Size reaffirms the process in

the following recommendations:

That enrolment limitations for Individual departments/

programs be considered when one or more of the following

conditions prevail.

e) enrolment growth exceeds the department's/

programs ability to respond because of physical

space constraints, the Inability of the Unh,ersltg to

allocate more operating resources to the

department/program, or the Inability of the

department/program to attract sufficient qualified

faculty;

undergraduate enrolment in the department/

•

program constitutes an excessive proportion of the

University's tot al undergraduate enrolment;

It Is determined that the best interests of the

de p

artment /

Pro g r am

and the University In

maintaining academic quality require that

enrolment be limited.

That policies for limiting departmental/ program

enrolments be uniform across the University,

recognizing that unique situations may require special

attention.

That the policy for limiting departmental/program

'enrolments take the following form:

recommendation by the department/program, in

conjunction with the Faculty Dean, of the number

of students which It can accommodate In its

honors, major, minor and other programs to SCAP.

establishment of a minimum cumulative 6PA and/or

other criteria for consideration and/or acceptance into

departmental programs. The cumulative SPA will

be set at a level which is expected to enrol the

number of students determined in a).

to remain in a department's program, the student

Mall be expected to maintain a cumulative GPA at

a level to be determined at the time that the

enrolment limitation policy Is established.

students who are not accepted into departmental

programs but who wish to take upper division

courses in the department, meg be governed by a

cumulative APR required at th. time they wish to

register In these courses.

Approval by Senate and Board of Governors would be

required In each case.

ITIONAL MEASUR

The Task Force on University Size recognizes the lack of precision

from which any quota system will suffer. We strongly believe that if we

have erred in our recommendations it has been in the direction of

insufficient restraint on enrolment, given the serious shortages in every

area of resource need. To do other than take this conservative approach

has been unpalatable to most. members of the committee. We have

striven for a balance between the maintenance of opportunity for our

students and the prevention of further erosion in the quality of the

instruction we are capable of offering them. In order to monitor the

impact of these recommendations, and to assess social and political

changes which may affect their salience, several future steps are

needed. In addition, some other potential mechanisms should be

investigated in order to ensure reasonable equity of unfortunately limited

opportunity. Therefore we recommend the following:

That SCRIP monitor closely the impact of enrolment

limitation measures and recommend appropriate

changes, as needed, to Senate for Its consideration.

That TFIJS examine and make recommendations to SCAP

on the expected growth In Downtown and DISC

enrolments with a view to maximizing opportunities for

students while restricting on-campus registration to an

appropriate capacity.

That TFUS examine and make recommendations to SCAP

on the effects of raising the APR required for

maintaining active student status and for graduation

from the University. . . .

That TFUS examine and report on the potential impact of

these enrolment restrictions on the tutorial system and

on graduate student support.

That the University aggressively pursue the appropriate

resources to accommodate the current enrolment of

12.700.

It should be clear that the adoption of some or all of these recommend-

ations may require changes to the mandates of some of the Senate

Committees, e.g. SCAP. It is understood that in light of Senate actions

any required changes will be made and tabled in Senate for information,1

in the near future.

SiMON FRASER UNIVERSITY

4S. ?C;)-

I N6

MEMORANDUM

Attachment 41

1)t.......................................... 

?

From..... ...M. .1:ln................................. 

?

.

Date ...... 

9..

Subjed....... 

?

on

Enrolment Limitation 

Action taken by the Senate Committee on Academic 

Planning at its meeting of September 22, 1982 and the Senate 

Undergraduate Admission Board at its meeting of October 21, 

1982 gives rise to the following motion. 

NOTION 

That Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of 

Governors the following recommendations concerning limitation 

of enrolment. 

A. General 

1.

That any policies for limiting enrolment shall be based 

primarily on academic, achievement and potential. 

2.

That any regulations involving University or department 

enrolment limitations shall be conveyed to students as 

early as possible. Since unforeseen circumstances may 

require special actions to control enrolments, a statement 

advising of this possibility shall be included in the 

University calendar. 

3.

That no action be taken on the specific recommendations 

regarding overall University enrolment limitation until 

a)

there has been discussion with the other two 

universities and other educational institutions; 

b)

the new UCBC grant allocation mechanism has been 

established. 

B. University Enrolment 

1. That, until additional space is made available and until 

the University's operating grant support reflects actual 

increases in the costs of operating the University, the 

undergraduate head count enrolment in the Fall semester 

shall be limited to 11,000 students. The determination 

of head count enrolment for this purpose shall exclude 

enrolment in the Directed Independent Study Course program 

and other programs funded through the Interior budget. 

cont . • . Page 2 

.

• rage 2 

Senate 

November 23, 1982 

To implement this overall limitation, the following 

specific limitation measures shall be employed, in 

the order indicated. 

a)

Reconsideration of the international 

,

student quota 

to ensure that this group of students bears an 

propriate proportion of the reduction in total 

enrolment and that there is consistency between 

the standards applied to this group and other 

admission categories. 

b)

The high school grade point average required to 

enter the University directly from B.C. high schools 

continue at 2.50 for all students, but with modifi- 

cation of the present review process for applicants 

below this level. 

c)

The regulations governing the academic standing required 

for continuance as a student be made more stringent. The 

changes should concentrate on reducing the period of time 

in which students with deficient GPAs may continue as 

Studentsand on removing the authority of the Senate 

-Appeals Board to re-admit students who are on "required, 

to withdraw" or "permanent withdrawal" status. 

(NOTE:- The Senate Undergraduate Admissions Board has 

given consideration to this matter and it is expected that 

specific recommendations will be brought forward to Senate 

shortly. It is 

intended that action in this area be under- 

taken as soon as possible because of academic standards, 

without reference to the enrolment limitation processes. 

The recommendations at present are at SCUS). 

d)

The

admission of students under the maturestudent category 

be adjusted with more stringent conditions for continuance. 

(NOTE:- The Senate undergraduate Admissions Board has given 

consideration to this topic and it is expected that specific 

recommendations will come forward from that body to Senate 

shortly. The recommendations at present are at SCUS). 

cont . . . Page 3 

.

•Pag3. 

Senate 

Nvember 23, 1I2 

) The cumulative grade point average normally required 

for admission of students transferring from colleges 

and universities be set at 2.25 for Canadian institutions. 

The equivalent requirement for non-Canadian institutions 

shall be increased to 2.65. 

f) Limitation of enrolment beyond the levels achieved 

through a), b), c), and d), be accomplished by in- 

creasing the required level of academic achievement 

in some or all of the above areas. 

2. That, since part-time students constitute an increasing 

proportion of total undergraduate enrolment, a separate 

study be made to assess the implications of this trend on 

operating and capital costs and the character of the 

University. 

C. Departmental Enrolments 

1. That enrolment limitations for individual departmentS,be 

considered when one of the following conditions prevails: 

a)

enrolment growth exceeds the department's ability to 

respond because of physical space 

constraints,

the

inability of the University to allocate more operating 

resources to the department, or the 

inability 

of the 

department to attract sufficient qualified faculty; 

b)

undergraduate enrolment in the department constitutes 

an excessive proportion of the 

University's total 

undergraduate enrolment; 

c)

it is determined that the' best interests of the 

departmert and 

the University in 

maintaining

academic 

quality require that enrolment be limited. 

2. That policies for limiting departmental enrolments be 

uniform across the University, recognizing that unique 

situations may require special attention. 

3. That the policy for limiting departmental enrolments take 

the following form: 

a)

determination by .the department, in conjunction with 

the Faculty Dean, of the number of students which it 

can accommodate in its honors, major, minor and other 

programs. 

b)

establishment of a minimum cumulative G.P.A. for accep- 

tance into departmental programs. The cumulative G.P.A.' 

will be set at a level which is expected to enrol the 

number of students determined in a); 

to remain in a department's program, the student shall be 

expected to maintain a cumulative G.P.A. at a level to 

be determined at the time that the enrolment limitation 

policy is established; 

Pge4 

Senate 

November 23, 1982 

d) students who are not 

but who wish to take 

departments shall be 

required at the time 

courses. 

Approval by Senate and B 

in each case. 

accepted into departmental programs 

upper division courses in the 

governed by the cumulative 

G.P.A.

they wish to register in these 

oard of Governors would be required 

D.

Scheduling and Flexibility 

That the recommendations of the Senate Committee on University 

Budget in its report "Enrolment Growth: The Effect on Instructional 

Facilities", relating to the feasibility of assigning courses to 

individual rooms after the completion of in-person registration, 

spreading of courses more evenly across the five-day week, more 

effective scheduling of evening courses, and more efficient use 

of large lecture theatres be considered for implementation. 

E.

Future Review 

That the Senate Committee on Academic Planning be given 

responsibility for monitoring the impact of enrolment 

.

?

?

limitation measures and recommending appropriate changes to 

Senate for its consideration. 

RATIONALE

The report of the President's Committee on Enrolment-Limitation 

is attached for information, and provides rationale for the 

proposed motion. The report and its recommendations were considered 

by the Senate Committee on Academic Planning and, in addition, 

section C of those recommendations, dealing with university. 

enrolment, has received consideration by the Senate Undergraduate 

Admissions Board, with specific recommendations from that Board 

expected to come forward shortly to Senate. The motion now 

proposed for Senate consideration is based on the actions of the 

two Senate committees. 

j. x. Munro 

/d s 

Attachment #2

ttt ?

atatat

atatatat

at ?

aat

C WI-In

ID10PS10M)

.00001IflI0

001011004W

at, ?

ON ID .-(I.' ?

('Vi .IflP.WI.CID

ID .

.00' ?

C ?

(7.-

01 ft

f l )

In ?

I') ?

- ID

01 WO .

Win

ID In

ID 01

I') PS I".

WoOf) In

I'.

I') N ID P

P ..

F-QIDV).V) ?

• Ot.IDIDID

OC'.0)

0.-.'q

001

ID ?

CCJ ?

• ,.

ID ?

1 IDIDF.iOPS

CY M

a 010W0N1')IDIOO

ID .NWIDF-.'

W10mnO.-IDIDOI00 ?

(V ?

100)ID

•

01041')

P. 0) WIn I')

0101001

ID '

- N N 10-N It) N ?

VI ?

ID ?

In (4 'V -

ID -

- I') N

(. 4 (I0) Cu 1') U)

0)01 ID ?

• - 100)1')

0 C'. ID

001001

In . C'. 0)

10 .

N ID ?

(V N ID .

'mWF-IDOIDPSNID2 ?

SNIA N

I. ?

-0) ?

•0 ?

IDID.'F-ID ID

U)IDIDON

• WI- IDID

0IDO ?

ID -

0)1

5 ?

Ow ID

C'.

I') 0)

ID In

C') (II'. 0) N (V

N I. ?

(V N N 0

In ?

ID ?

ONIDON ?

IDID.(IDNI-IDIbVIDNIDIDW

ftPSIDIDIDIDID

I')

• Cl

In ID ID ?

F-

I- 01 ID 01 Cl ID U) P.. . ?

ID .- ID ID In IA

a. 0 )

ID C'. ID (V

ID 1') ?

C'. N 0) .- .-

N ?

ID ?

N .

(

0* ?

0 .In

atatat

IDOIf).

ttt

satatatatatatatatatat

OWOIDIDID ?

atatatatatat

IDIDInOU) ?

atM

'ID

(V *ewPs'7

0)N. ?

O01NO'VInOOOVI')

i')0)IDi')

. 17 Ôr)w)

CllDIDI')

In ID

0 0 01

IOIDWIDIDIDF-ONWO01U)NPSIDO

01 ?

15010

0)0)

0 Ps

030

N1-ft

In NO ??

0) (.4

- It)

IDID0)IDP0)

01 t

f 1-

0) OInU).0

F-InW01WID0)IDGGNNon

U) •P-IDNIDO ?

F-C'. ?

C') 0) VI Cl 01F-

4001040) 4')

ID U)

It) ?

0101 ?

040) 0) N N

N ?

It) ?

0) N ID . ?

• ?

0 ?

P..

• ID.10In4')

IDIDOPSO

N In 0)

IDIDID01InIDIDNPSNNOIn

..I')ID..V)IOPSIDIDU),IDID.W)aU)

ID ?

InID00ID

Ø10ID

ID ?

ID ? ID ?

P..

ON'S

C4InC'.NID

InV)IDOID

I') ID

WF-WCl

InOCu.F-IDIDN10IDOOOID.GID

C')

ID U)

.-OIDID*PS

N.IDt'

I

'

ft

o OF-

.. ?

'.' ?

ID._ ?

InInWIDO)

IDID.WWIDIDIDInIDIDC'.10iA 0 P.

*'VF--In- ID

P-P-In P..

US ?

• 10(0W

N ID

(.4

0)1-OlD

0) ?

IDIOPSIDIDID

010

ID .- N C'. 'V

C'.

N ID N ?

In ID

N ID .-

ID ?

F-

o. ?

IDIDWOI.4

ID In 0 0 01

NIDWIn

1') ID

OID.1-ID.PSNID*

PSI-U) P

WON

0) ?

010)IDO

1') ('30110

ID ?

Cu 01

N ID 0) ?

0) ID

(V Cd ID (V -

ID ?

CliIà IV

-P-N ?

0)NOID ?

I*.0) ?

Il Z1?

)- ?

0 ?

C'. ?

ID ?

M1 IDON

P..

Cd IDWIDWID

ID It)

C'.

GU)InCID(.40.200

F- ?

0)...(I)'V10ID

- .-

ID ID

P..

•

.'IDOON

ID P

01 ?

C'. ? 0)

C'. 0)01 01

I') It) NI- .

ID 1')'0 I-ID NW ID ID OW ID N F- In ID ID ID ID -

ID ?

1010W

0)InIt)In

ID (.4N

O0)NIDID

OF-IDP

0) ID

I- IDIDIDU)

. ?

0) ?

N ? N

IA ?

I')

WIDF-

ID-IDOl')

It) OCVP-In

UI-IANIAIDONIDInIDOIDIDNNID

W.I0ID IDF-IDO ?

1010001ID

OOIDIDNN

ID ?

. ?

In (V

ID ?

In ?

N ?

In ?

('4

ID N N ID

C'. wow-"

(0101001.-

WIn ID ID(VW04P.(gOID

ID N ?

N ?

CO to - --

0) ?

ID In

('4

. P-'oW

(0W

0 0

P.. P

IDIDNO0

0 ID . 0

0)010001

ID 0

1010(00.10

ID ?

- am"-C-

N ?

N I-

I".

• 100)01

1010

(VIAl')

'0 .- .(

I')

ID ID

OW .- . ID ID ID .- ON -00 F-

('30110100 PZ

IDIDWPS

ID ?

ID Cu

. ?

(V .

ID ? 0

F- -

(l)'C

9..J

000) ?

F- 0)

° ?

4 ?

031-1

0-1 ?

wo 2T

E ?

o jw!;0 ?

'C'CZU)O

ID •

JIA(01I(

U.'CUOwmwu.OXIOa.a.A.O

CULTYCFLC'ISTRBIJTIONSFRZADSHEET --

History of CFL Assignments

10.00

9.00

42%

24.50

24.50

1925

19.00

19.75

27.00

27.00

13.00

12.00

11.00

-14%

244.60

247.85

4025

4025

42.10

4230

CMIIIS

12.50

11.50

13.50

21.50

15.00

15.00

15.50

NRM

3.75

4.00

3.75

APPLIED SCIENCES

51.75

51.75

5125

50.50

51.50

5425

BISC

33.00

33.00

33.00

32.00

34.05

HEH

24.17

24.17

24.17

24.17

24.17

25.17

MATH

30.00

32.00

33.50

12%

19.00

108.17

114.22

ENSC

11.00

UNIVERSITY

502.47

503.47

504.12

,l14,

LLJ

<"a

O)-

a)a)a)a)a)a)

a). ?

a)a)(O

<... ( a) a) Co C) CJ C) C) C) C) C) C) C') C) C) a) a) C) C) C) C) Co a)

C) C) a) C) C) C) a)

I-

C')

C)C)C)C)C)a) ?

a)C)C)C)C)C)a) a) a)

)- .,

C) C) C) C)

I- CY

a) C) a) C) C) C)

C) C) a) a) a) C) a) C)

C) CD CD CD

c'.j

CD -

IkJZ

- ?

—

(0C'JC) ?

C)C)C))C)C)C)a)C)')(')(O ?

C) C) a)

C) C) a)

Ct) a)-C)C)r-. a)a)a)a)C)C)C)C)C)a)a)C)C)C)C)C)C)

14)

—a)c)c)

ddda)a)a)a)a)a)a)a)

ó C..J

ea)C)v)-

(< C.)-

'--

-Z ?

..J

Corgo,a)Lr)

C)C)P-C)C)C)

a). ?

a)a)a)r-a)C)

C')

- ?

v,u

U) U

- -

•• - -

-, ?

OUJ

cD cD cD co

CO)r.C)a)O)C)

a)C)C)a)a)

C) C)

a) ?

C) C) a) C) C) C)

Ci r-

U) C') ( C) ('4 ('4 C) ) CO

C) -

14)11) CO COO) 7- ('4 a) C) - a) C') CO C)

C) C) CO CO C) CO C') - -

7-CO (OCO7-C)7-O) tna)a)cor-tn7-

U) 0)C)2C)C)Co7

Ct)

•

'U ?

UJLU

C.)

C?) ?

x ? -

LLJ

-w w

, ?

LLJ

QULUC<

UQCJLUW

C-)

(JJb. ?

LA-

C-n?

LLJJU-

wI_w

<'U LL.

U)U)

(.)U)

I- U-

(flw

-J

I-

W(fl

'LIZ

ZC)

I-

LLJ

I-I---

LLJ

(nZ

LLS

— Cx ? 0-NP' 04ON(7'0-N

LL, OD

U)z

LLJ

O-JU)U)

Cx ?

I- Z<

LLJ

U)Ch0

-, ?

-J

W ZU - WZ

_aW'UWz

>-I-

Ct) Ct)

<.:

Ezz

l-.I-0

aww

I_ •<

a CO OD

cx cx (n

a. a

% a' . z z

o '.0 '.0 0 0 00 00 00

Attachment #6

ID.

• 0

o ?

0 ?

o ?

0 ?

o ?

0 ?

'0 ?

0 ?

- ?

o ?

—w

In—I

c'i

0%.

B.C. U1VTE8

Attachment 7

Index (1972==100) of the B.C. Government Operating Grazits/rrS ___

Arid BC. Government Operating Grants Plu

Tuition

F902

(Credit Courøe)/l'i

(Constant Dollars)

110

(O5

100

Sea

z,'a

72/74 T41TJ T4/TO

re/Fr

TT/7J TIfiD

re/mo mo/at

Cf/U a/a.

U004 a.,U CU/B U/i? CY/il

Y Eft

SQi4rce;

UCBC Amrvea2 Reports. T. U.?. C., an4

)tj,fl(fl.ja

3tatcnwnt.

frstUitiq Aiys'

JI cL

1981

Attachment 8

Attachment #9