1. • FOR INFORMATION S.91-38
  2. SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
    1. MEMORANDUM
  3. . SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
    1. MEMORANDUM

.fr
'a
• FOR INFORMATION
S.91-38

Back to top


SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
MEMORANDUM
Registrar and Secretary of the Senate
To:
Senate
From:
Senate Committee on
Agenda and Rules
Subject:
Student Representation
Date:
June 26, 1991
on Senate Committees
Attached is a report pertaining to student representation on Senate Committees submitted
to the Senate Committee on Agenda and Rules by the Registrar and Secretary of Senate.
The report is now presented to Senate for information.
S
is

Back to top


.
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
MEMORANDUM
Registrar and Secretary of the Senate
To: SCAR
From: Ron Heath
Re: Student Representation
Date:
May 15, 1991
on Senate Committees
At the last meeting of SCAR, I was asked to report on the question of student
membership on Senate Committees. There are 20 committees of Senate (including
sub-committees of Senate Committees), with a total of 54 student representatives. In
some cases, membership on one Committee carries with it membership on another.
This total includes those identified as Alternate members. There are 14 elected
students on Senate.
In general, students members are determined in four ways:
1)
nominated by the Senate Nominating Committee, with elections occunng at
Senate;
SCAP
3 Student Senators
SCUB
3 Student Senators (Student Senators from SCAP)
SCAR
1 Student Senator
SCCS
1
Student Senator and 1 Student Senator Alternate
S
SCHD
1 Student Senator
SLC
1
Student Senator and 1 Student Senator Alternate
SNC
1
Student Senator and 1 Student Senator Alternate
ESC
1
Student Senator
2)
named by
SCAD
SPCSAB
SUAAC
SGAAC
SAB
the Student Society;
3 students and 1 student alternate
1 undergraduate student and 1 graduate student
1 undergraduate student (same as on SPCSAB)
1 graduate student
1 graduate student (same as on SPCSAB)
1 undergraduate student
2 students and 2 student alternates
3)
elected by constituents;
SGSC
5 graduate students (one from each Faculty) and 5 graduate student
alternates (elected by graduate students in the Faculty)
ACNGP
1 graduate student (elected by and from the graduate students on the
SGSC)
4)
elected by members of another Senate Committee;
SCEMP 1 Student Senator elected by members of SCAP
SDCPC 2 Student Senators elected by and from SCAP
0

In addition, the student members of some Committees are determined by a combination
of the above procedures.
LPAC
2 Student Senators (the regular and alternate Student Senator
members from SLC) plus
1 undergraduate and 1 graduate student selected by the Student
Society
SUAB
2 Student Senators and 1 Student Senator alternate plus
1 student member and 1 student member alternate named by the
Student Society
SCUS
1 Student Senator plus
1 undergraduate student named by the Student Society.
Currently there are 24 designated regular and alternate positions for Student Senators
on committees of Senate and there are 19 regular and alernate positions for
appointment by the Student Society. The remaining 11 positions are elected by
students. There is nothing in the Rules of Senate that would prevent a Student Senator
from seeking the appointment from the Student Society to one of those positions.
If the 54 Senate Committee memberships were to be restricted to Student Senators,
each Student Senator would have to average approximately four regular and alternate
committee memberships. My experience suggests that several positions would end up
being vacant, thereby reducing the overall opportunity for student input and access to
Senate Committees. Even with the current designated 24 Student Senator regular and
alternate positions, each Student Senator would have an average of close to two
Committee appointments.
What we have is a situation that has evolved over time, and I'm not convinced we have
any compelling evidence to suggest that there should be a dramatic overhaul to this
structure. In addition, the current membership designations allow for efficient and
orderly replacement in the event of resignations and other vacancies.
If a change is considered advisable, there should be sufficient flexibility to allow for
appointment to vacant positions in order to maintain student representation on
committees. One suggestion would be to give Student Senators right of first access to
any student position(s) on Senate Committees (with elections by Senate or Senate
Committee if necessary) with remaining positions to be filled through request to the
Student Society. I have several concerns about the adoption of this process. For
instance, we would have to do a complete re-assessment of the terms of office for
student positions. For example, the Student Senator position on the SCHD is for an
unspecified term of office meaning that the Student Senator remains a member of the
Committee so long as he/she is a member of Senate. If we go this alternate route and
the position were to be filled by someone other than a Student Senator, the student
named by the Student Society would hold the position so long as he/she remained a
student, even if in the following year a Student Senator indicated an interest in the
position.
In short, while probably not perfect, the current format is working reasonably well.
1*
0

Back to top