1. Page 1
    2. Page 2
    3. Page 3
    4. Page 4
    5. Page 5

 
S.92-33
O
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
OFFICE OF THE VICE-PRESIDENT, ACADEMIC
MEMORANDUM
To: ?
Senate
From: ?
J.M. Munro, Chair, Senate
Committee on Academic Planning
Subject: ?
Advanced Registration for Direct Entry from B.C. Secondary Schools
Date: ?
April 23, 1992
Action undertaken by the Senate
Committee
on Academic Planning at its meeting
of April 8, 1992 gives
rise to the following motion:
Motion
• "That Senate approve
and
Governors, that students s
entry from B.C. secondy
for 92-3, and that ip-egi
and
report on t3.e'finding
ecompiid approval to the Board of
admission on the basis of direct
;chools be given advanced registration
trar monitor the effects of this change
to SCUS."
A)A"
/fla&
AMY
/qQ
1^1

 
Simon Fraser University
?
Roger Blackman
Department of Psychology
?
Department Chair
?
CC 5245 291-3358
MEMORANDUM
To: Jock Munro, Chair SCAP
Date: ?
April 3, 1992
Topic: Advanced Registration for Direct Entry Grade 12
Students
Please place on the SCAP agenda the following
recommendation regarding advanced registration for Direct
Entry Grade 12 students that has been approved by SCUS.
Motion
"That students seeking admission on the basis of direct
entry from B.C. secondary schools be given advanced
registration for 92-3, and that the Registrar monitor the
effects of this change and report on the findings to SCUS."
.
?
?
It is further proposed that this advanced registration
be scheduled in the manner described in Alternative 2 in the
attached memo from Ron Heath to SCUS and dated March 26,
1992.
Additional documentation offer a brief history of this
recommendation, including a rationale for the above motion.
\scus5\jmadregl
__
U S
[]
I.

 
Simon Fraser University
?
Roger Blackman
Department of Psychology
?
Department Chair
?
CC 5245 291-3358
MEMORANDUM
To: Jock Munro, Chair SCAP
Date:
?
April 2, 1992
Topic: Change in Registration Timing for B.C. Direct Entry
Secondary School Students: A Recommendation from SCUS
When teleregistration was being planned in 91-1, it was
recognized that changes accompanying this new procedure
might have a negative impact on the admission of B.C. direct
entry secondary school students. Specifically, it was
anticipated that other universities, particularly but not
only UBC and the University of Victoria, would complete the
admission and course registration process much earlier than
at SFU, and that this would undercut our recruiting efforts.
While most secondary school students are admitted
provisionally in the spring, the timing of course
registration varies across universities, with SFU's
registration being by far the latest. Students considering
competing offers would be faced with paying substantial non-
refundable deposits to other universities several weeks
before they would know the outcome of their registration at
SFU. It was also recognized that the problem would be
exacerbated by the lower success rate in our registration
system compared with that at other universities.
In response to these concerns, it was proposed by Nick
Heath, Director of Admissions, that changes should be made
in our registration release timing for B.C. secondary school
students. The proposal was that these students applying for
fall entry to SFU should be allowed to register earlier in
the summer, preferably at a time before the deadline for
non-refundable deposits at UBC and the University of
Victoria. There was insufficient time to address this
proposal before registration for 91-3. The matter was
forwarded to the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies
(SCUS) for its consideration.
SCUS formed a small subcommittee to identify and assess
the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed change in
the timing of registration for students admitted from B.C.
secondary schools. That subcommittee returned to SCUS with
a split report that listed some of the pro and con arguments
but left it to the full committee to decide the issue.
1

 
??
SCUS first considered the general question of whether
B.C. secondary school students should be given early
registration. The basic argument against the proposal is
that it would be unfair to continuing students and to other
new students who would find it more difficult to secure
places in 100-level courses. The counterargument is that it
would be unfair to students admitted from secondary school
not to make the proposed change. It is relevant to note
that about 15% of the students who currently register in
100-level courses are upper-level students.
After considerable discussion, and having received the
opinion of the SF13 Student Society and a large petition from
students, SCUS narrowly decided in favour of the proposal.
The consensus view of SCUS is that the potential disservice
to B.C. secondary school students of failing to advance the
timing of their registration weighs heavier than the
expected costs to other student groups. SCUS asked the
Registrar to report back to it with some alternative
mechanisms for implementing the change.
At a subsequent meeting, SCUS again •reviewed the
arguments for and against the change and considered the
alternative mechanisms proposed by the Registrar. SCUS then
voted in favour of a proposal that would allow B.C. direct
entry secondary school students to register earlier than
?
before and on a schedule that was coincident with continuing
students.
\scus5\jmadreg3
3.
.
2

 
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
MEMORANDUM
To: ?
SCUS
?
From: Ron Heath
Secretary, SCUS
Subject: ?
BC Grade 12
?
tration Priority ?
Date: March 26, 1992
Cu.S
v-jo
At the last meeting, the following motion was approved:
?
-
"that SCUS approve, for 92-3, priority registration for students admitted directly from BC
Grade 12 and that the Registrar will monitor and provide feedback to the Committee".
It has been determined that this motion will have to proceed to SCAP and Senate for
approval before implementation, and that the method of implementation should be
included as part of the proposal.
Two alternatives for implementation were considered. In each case, it is assumed that
there will be approximately 1200 students in this category, and that a maximum of 900 to
1000 students may be released to the telephone registration system on any given day.
Alternative 1
The first alternative would allow the BC Grade 12 students absolute priority by releasing
one half of these students to the system on day I and the remainder on day 2 of the
telephone registration process for the Fall 92-3 Semester. On day 3, the top 900 - 1000
RPN students would be released to the telephone registration system.
Alternative 2
The second alternative, and the one that is being recommended for implementation,
would call for the release of the target of approximately 1200 BC Grade 12 students over
the first five days of the telephone registration process for the Fall 92-3 Semester (i.e.
approximately 240 per day based on a descending admission GPA). Concurrently, on
each of those days, approximately 660 - 760 continuing students would be released to
telephone registration starting with those students with the highest RPN. On day 6, all
900 - 1000 students would be released on the basis of the RPN.
The process being recommended should allow senior students, especially those in
graduating semesters, sufficient opportunity to register in courses necessary to complete
programs. It also should give those students who have been offered entrance
scholarships the opportunity to gain entry to courses required for their programs. In
effect, this is a compromise situation between the current procedure and one which
would give the new student first chance at all courses.
Motion: "that SCUS approve, for the Fall 92-3 Semester, the process identified in
Alternative 2 as- set out above, for the release of students to the telephone registration
system."
?
0
4

Back to top