1. Page 1
    2. Page 2
    3. Page 3
    4. Page 4
    5. Page 5
    6. Page 6
    7. Page 7
    8. Page 8
    9. Page 9
    10. Page 10
    11. Page 11
    12. Page 12
    13. Page 13
    14. Page 14
    15. Page 15
    16. Page 16
    17. Page 17
    18. Page 18
    19. Page 19
    20. Page 20
    21. Page 21
    22. Page 22
    23. Page 23
    24. Page 24
    25. Page 25
    26. Page 26
    27. Page 27
    28. Page 28
    29. Page 29
    30. Page 30
    31. Page 31
    32. Page 32
    33. Page 33
    34. Page 34
    35. Page 35
    36. Page 36
    37. Page 37
    38. Page 38
    39. Page 39
    40. Page 40
    41. Page 41
    42. Page 42
    43. Page 43
    44. Page 44
    45. Page 45
    46. Page 46
    47. Page 47
    48. Page 48
    49. Page 49
    50. Page 50
    51. Page 51
    52. Page 52
    53. Page 53
    54. Page 54
    55. Page 55
    56. Page 56
    57. Page 57
    58. Page 58
    59. Page 59
    60. Page 60
    61. Page 61
    62. Page 62
    63. Page 63
    64. Page 64
    65. Page 65
    66. Page 66
    67. Page 67
    68. Page 68
    69. Page 69
    70. Page 70
    71. Page 71
    72. Page 72
    73. Page 73
    74. Page 74
    75. Page 75
    76. Page 76
    77. Page 77
    78. Page 78
    79. Page 79
    80. Page 80
    81. Page 81
    82. Page 82
    83. Page 83
    84. Page 84
    85. Page 85
    86. Page 86
    87. Page 87
    88. Page 88
    89. Page 89
    90. Page 90
    91. Page 91
    92. Page 92
    93. Page 93
    94. Page 94
    95. Page 95
    96. Page 96
    97. Page 97
    98. Page 98
    99. Page 99
    100. Page 100
    101. Page 101
    102. Page 102
    103. Page 103
    104. Page 104
    105. Page 105
    106. Page 106
    107. Page 107
    108. Page 108
    109. Page 109
    110. Page 110
    111. Page 111
    112. Page 112
    113. Page 113
    114. Page 114
    115. Page 115
    116. Page 116
    117. Page 117
    118. Page 118
    119. Page 119
    120. Page 120
    121. Page 121
    122. Page 122
    123. Page 123
    124. Page 124
    125. Page 125

 
S.93-60
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
MEMORANDUM
To:
?
Senate ?
From: ?
J.M. Munro, Chair
Senate Committee on
Academic Planning
Subject: ?
Faculty of Arts -
?
-
?
Date
?
November 18, 1993
Graduate Curriculum Revisions
Action undertaken by the Senate Graduate Studies Committee and the Senate Committee
on Academic Planning, gives rise to the following motion:
E1
Motion:
"that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
Governors
the proposed graduate program - M.A. Program in French as set
forth in S.93-60a
and
the proposed Ph.D. Program in Philosophy as set forth in S.93-
60c
and
the curriculum revisions for the Faculty of Arts as set forth as
follows:
?
S.93-60a ?
Department of French
?
S.93-60b ?
Department of History
?
S.93-60c ?
Department of Philosophy"

 
I
S.93-60a
Department of French
Summary. of Graduate Curriculum Revisions
SGSC Reference: ?
Mtg. of October 25, 1993
SCAP Reference: ?
SCAP 93- 38a
Proposed M.A. Piogram in French, including
S
New courses:
FREN 800 - 2
FREN 801 - 2
FREN8O2-2
FREN 823-5
FREN 824 - 5
FREN 825 - 5
FREN 826 -.5
FREN 830 - 5
FREN831-5
FREN 832 - 5
Readings in French Linguistics
Readings in French Literature
Basic Research Methods
Interdisciplinary Approaches to French Literature
Topics in French Canadian Literature
Topics in French Literature
Monographic Studies
Canadian French
Studies of Bilingualism in the French-Speaking World
Theoretical Approaches to the Acquisition of French
as a second language
Acting under delegated authority of Senate, the SGSC has approved the following course
revisions:
Change of credit hours and calendar description for FREN 807-5, 808-5, 809-5, 811-5,
812-5, 813-5, 814-5, 815-5,816-5,817-5,818-5,820-5,821-5,822-5
fl

 
I
.
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
Department of French
To: ?
B.P.
Clayman, Dean of Graduate Studies
From: Phyllis Wrenn
Date: August 4, 1993
Re: ?
French Graduate Program Proposal, overlap with Linguistics
The proposed Masters program in French with concentration in linguistics will provide
training inngui theory
_
-
applied-to--the-analysis-of-the French-language —The theoretical -
?
- -
framework draws on all schools of linguistics, both European and North American. It thus
offers a training distinct from that offered by the Department of Linguistics in several
respects: the overall goal is the study of linguistic methods applied to the analysis of
French,
with the objective of gaining insights into the French language rather than into linguistic
theories
per se.
All courses are taught in French, and data analysed is drawn exclusively from
the French language or varieties of French. The Department of Linguistics uses data drawn
from diverse languages (Amerindian, Asian, as well as European, including English), its
overall goal being an emphasis on the study of linguistic theories. Admission to the
Linguistics M.A. program, and, consequently, to Graduate Linguistics courses, requires a
background in General Linguistics.
Students preparing a Masters in French may count one course from another
department's offerings towards their degree requirements (a total of four courses will be
required to satisfy course requirements). Any student having an adequate preparation in
General Linguistics may thus take one course from the Linguistics Department as part of their
degree requirements. Such a student, however, would most likely be the exception rather than
the norm, since our experience has shown that candidates coming to our graduate program
from other universities, Canadian or overseas, do not have a strong background either in
linguistic theory or in the latest trends in analytical methods. While we would, of course,
encourage suitable candidates to avail themselves of opportunities in the Linguistics
Department, it would be inappropriate to raise false expectations.
If it is judged desirable to include a statement in the calendar entry drawing the
students' attention to the possibility of taking courses in the Linguistics Department, it is
imperative that the necessity for prior preparation in
General Linguistics
be made clear. A
possible wording (inserted on page12, paragraph beginning Upon the approval of) might be:
"For a concentration in linguistics, students able to demonstrate adequate preparation in
General Linguistics may wish to consider taking a course in the Linguistics Department. For a
concentration in literature, students may wish to consider taking a course in the English
Department."

 
I WiVIIk'A I
? ciO1i'flT!
pzII
III
'
III)
N$
-....---....----....---.."---....--
4,
-.... -.... -....
__
- -
- -
a
Note: Lower language courses chaired & taught by lecturers not included
(also not "education" courses)
R.D.:
Rosena Davison
J.V.:
Jacqueline Viswanathan
P.W.:
Phyllis Wrenn
GP.:
Guy Poirier
B.B.:
Barrie Bartlett
C.N.:
Christine Nivet
a
3

 
TENTATIVE FRENCH GRADUATE COURSE OFFERINGS
OWN
TF..
I-
__
-....
Required courses: offered Fall & Spring
?
Projected registration: 5-10 students
Core courses: offered once a year
Specialized courses: on demand
.
.
S
4/.

 
FRENCH GRADUATE FACULTY WORKLOAD - TEACHING
?
(TENTATIVE)
94-1
94-2
94-3
95-1
95-2
95-3
Bartlett
370
Research
270
270
Research
370
414
413
411
406
812
808
(818)
(813)
Davison
140
Research
AL
AL
Research
301
825
Repi. 465
(821)
Fauquenoy
Research
Sabbatical
Sabbatical 270
414
408
RepL 421
422
270
809
811
802
310
Merler
Research
240
230
Sabbatical
Sabbatical
Research
475
470
RepI.
Repi. 360
824
Nivet
411
Research
420
370
Research
270 ?
-
807
370
302
412
802
809
802
Poirier
360
Research
360
46()
Research
463
463
430
360
230
821
801
821/802
802
Steele
Research
360
301
Research
360
475
301
474
431
823
(822)
Grad.
230
course
Viswanathan
230
230
240
Research
341
467
360
472
467
802
(823)
Wrenn
270
408
Research
407
370
Research
407
Spec.
807
301
Grad.
course
AL: Administrative leave
1 ]
.
5-

 
I
Sample Student Program: (Full time)
Linguistics:
First year
Fall ?
800 (req) (2)
807(5)
822
(5)
or 813 (5)
12 credits
Spring 802 (req) (2)
808
(5)
- --- --8-2-l-(5)-or-8-l-2-(-5)------ -______
12 credits
I ,i teratu re:
First year
Fall ?
801(2)
820(5).
823
(5)
S
12
credits
Spring 802 (2)
821 (5)
825(5)
12 credits
S
Second year
Fall: M.A. Thesis or 809
(5)
Spring: M.A. Thesis
or 814
(5)
and field examination
Second Year
Fall: M.A. Thesis
or 822(5)
Spring: M.A. Thesis
or 826(5) and field examination

 
q-.
111111111211111111
IIIIIIIllh'II
IIIIII!IIIIllI
IIllhIIIIIIII1II
IIIII1IIIIIII
IIuhIIIIIIII
lullIIi
lIIllll!ilIlllII
iiiiiiiiiiiiuiui•
IlIllilIlIlIlIlil.
MENNEN
iiiiui
ONE
Imliiiiiiiiiiui
liliI'IlllIlIIIIIi
lIllllIIllll!I
lIIllllIIIlill
IIlIlIllIIIiIIl!Ii
oullIlIlIIllu
IIIIIiliIIlII'II
lluiI'uIIlIII'
liillIIlllIlIGli
I1lIllllIllIlIl
1111111111
MAIMMUMMEMM
IlI
liuiiiullllIIIII
.
0
I
I
.

 
-
z
F)
I
CD
0
w
3
CD
CD
0
-
0
-,
0
(a
C
-o
a.
0
(D
a.
(0
(0
C.)
0

 
ci
1. ?
PREAMBLE
The present Department of French, as the former French Division of the DLLL, was
responsible for the French component of the DLLL Graduate Program. It was for many years
a graduate program in French Linguistics only; students entering the program were expected
to have a strong preparation in French Linguistics, and some training in General Linguistics
was desirable; others were required to undertake a Qualifying year. In recent years the
curriculum was expanded to include three courses in literary analysis, enabling literature
faculty to play a role, albeit still limited, in Graduate Studies.
It was also responsible for the MA - Teaching of French, a Masters program designed
for practising teachers, with courses taught by Graduate faculty from the French Division, as
well as Graduate faculty from the Linguistics Division in its early years, and sessional
appointments.
On dissolution of the DLLL, the new Department was assigned administrative
responsibility for the undergraduate program in French. The graduate program in French,
although it had functioned academically as a distinct entity, and has continued to do so in the
interval, remained a component of the Graduate Program in Languages and Linguistics, along
with the program in General Linguistics. (The very successful MATF had been placed under
moratorium in 1983 for financial reasons.)
In March 1992, SCAP gave approval in principle to the proposal to "repatriate" the
graduate program, in effect to replace the existing calendar entry for Languages and
Linguistics with two separate entries, one for Linguistics and another for French.
The attached program proposal for French incorporates the curriculum of the old
French program, but with a number of important substantive changes that reflect our
experience in recruiting and guiding students through the MA / PhD in French and the
MATF. As a free-standing program it should appeal to and be accessible to graduates from a
French program. While a good background in contemporary methods of linguistic or literary
analysis is desirable, and a knowledge of general theory is an advantage, it is not essential for
success in the program. Students with limited preparation in linguistics or in literary theory
should, however, expect to do some makeup work.
The MA will provide a No-Thesis option, requiring additional coursework and a
"field" examination. In addition to two new required introductory courses, a number of new
courses, reflecting the evolution in faculty research interests and the addition of new faculty,
as well as recognizing the status of literary studies in the Department's curriculum, are
proposed. The expanded course offerings integrate the FSL option represented by the MATF
into a single Masters program as an area of concentration (French as a Second Language)
alongside French Linguistics and French Literature.
Existing graduate courses in French linguistics include the now traditional domains of
ci.

 
linguistic analysis: phonology, morphology and syntax, semantics, dialectology, applied
linguistics, as well as reflecting speéific research interests of current faculty: history of
linguistic theory, French creole studies, phonostylistics, discourse analysis. Proposed new
reading courses will explore topics relevant to the Canadian context, such as bilingualism and
the second-language acquisition of French. In literature, methods of literary analysis and
discourse analysis have been stressed. In proposing new graduate courses, literature faculty
have chosen to design a series of Topics courses based on different approaches to literary
research, in order to obtain maximum flexibility without encumbering the Calendar entry.
The provision of an alternative to the Thesis option in the Masters program is in
keeping with a growing trend in the Faculty of Arts, and reflects a desire to better serve the
various needs of a diverse clientele.
Rather than attempt at this time to revise the curriculum of the MATF,we have
iidè ?
iiio specialize in FSL with a more flexible
curriculum in a single degree program. These students will be expected to explore the
pedagogical applications of linguistic and literary analysis both in their readings and in their
research for courses and thesis or examination. In the future, it is hoped that the collaboration
of colleagues in the Faculty of Education will permit expansion of this pedagogical option.
Finally, it is proposed also that the PhD in French (under the old program a distinct
entity with its own requirements) be available henceforth under Special Arrangements. This
.
?
will permit us to concentrate on recruiting at the Masters level and building that program into
a strong basis for an eventual reintroduction of the PhD program.
2. ?
NEED FOR THE PROGRAM
a) ?
Objectives of the Program and relationship to existing Programs
The French Graduate program will complement and continue the undergraduate
program in French, with its strength in linguistics as well as literature, and its commitment to
encouraging students to combine studies in the two related disciplines. Graduate faculty in
both areas, both in their research and in their teaching, stress the interdependence as well as
the distinctness of literary and linguistic analysis.
The French Graduate program, with its breadth of topics in literature and linguistics,
echoes the interdisciplinary humanistic trend established elsewhere in the SFU curriculum by
the Masters program in Liberal Arts. While complementing the program in General
Linguistics, the linguistics component of the French program is distinct in two ways: while a
variety of linguistic theories and theoretical approaches are studied, both European and North
American, they are applied specifically to the analysis of French. And, since a major goal of
all students enrolled in a French program is mastery of the language, all courses, like those in
. ?
5
/0.

 
French literature, are conducted in French. The literature component will offer a
comprehensive genre- and period-oriented series of courses, in addition to the existing
methods courses.
Both the University of British Columbia and the University of Victoria offer a Masters
program in French; the former offers also a PhD in French. Victoria's program, which was
introduced in September 1992, provides opportunities for graduate study only in French and
francophone literatures, organized according to centuries in the traditional fashion, or by
geographical region. There is no linguistics component. The UBC program, while it does
provide opportunities for specialization in French linguistics, concentrates, as it has always
done, on literature. With its strong linguistics component our program will thus retain its
originality among those available in British Columbia, while simultaneously offering the
possibility of a comprehensive study of literature. In fact, no other French Department in
Western Canada has a graduate program striking an equal balance between linguistics and
literature. In Alberta, the French Department of the University of Calgary and the Department
of Romance Languages of the University of Alberta offer a Masters program in French
Literature; the latter offers also Masters programs in French Translation, in Romance
Linguistics, as well as PhD programs in French Literature, in Romance Linguistics, in
Romance Languages. Neither offers the possibility of study in French Linguistics, or the
combination of literature and linguistics.
b) ?
Recruiting history
?
.
In recent years, enrollments in the existing program have ranged from five to ten
students. In the 1992-93 calendar year, 5 students were enrolled in the MA program in
French; 2 of these have now completed their degree.
As an indication of potential interest, although in 1992 only 8 completed applications
were considered, 74 inquiries were received. There is no record of the number of inquiries
received regarding the status of the MATF; they do, nevertheless, still occur from time to
time. Overall, enrollment in the MA in French has remained modest over the years, due in
large part to the limited opportunity in Canada, outside SFU, for undergraduate studies in
French linguistics. The following sample illustrates the pattern of enrollments in the program
in recent years.
Applied ?
Accepted ?
Enrolled
i) ?
1989-1991 ?
20 ?
8 ?
3
1992 ?
8 ?
4 ?
1
93-1
?
6 ?
4 (2 pending)
The existing program has thus attracted, with its present requirements, and in spite of its lack
of a strong identity and without an aggressive marketing campaign, an average of 7 - 8
candidates per year. The unsuccessful applicants were rejected usually because their
6
/1.

 
undergraduate preparation was judged inappropriate or inadequate. (There is no formal,
quantitative record of the number of requests for consideration that were not encouraged to
proceed to formal application procedures for the same reason.)
It is anticipated that the establishing of a separate identity for the program, as well as
the proposed curriculum revisions, will result in an increase in the number of applications,
and that the curriculum revisions will result in a higher rate of acceptance. We nevertheless
propose that growth be controlled, and predicated on the basis of present faculty resources.
C) ?
Cultural, societal and professional objectives
Simon Fraser University has, since its inception, offered programs that take into
consideration the changing needs of society and of the Canadian fabric. The concept of
?
-
thetudy of French b
--
oth as a theoretical and as
a practical endeavour at the undergraduate and graduate levels has prepared and will continue
to prepare professionals whose skills and competence are sought in various fields.
Graduates of the old program hold faculty positions at major B.C. colleges: Capilano,
Douglas, Kwantlen, Kamloops. Two are faculty members in SFU's Department of French; a
third has retired from the Department, and another is employed as a Language Instructor.
Graduates of the MATF are found in the school system throughout British Columbia, a well
as the other Canadian provinces, in the Public Service as well as in Educational
administration.
Other career possibilities, predicated upon further training, exploit skills developed in
language study, and literary and linguistic analysis: in the media professions, journalism, the
civil service, diplomatic careers, law, tourism.
3. ?
PRESENT AND PROJECTED RESOURCES
a)
Administrative: Responsibility for the Graduate Program in Languages and Linguistics
is presently shared by the Departments of French and of Linguistics. There is one secretary,
part-time, who is "lodged" in the Linguistics Department. The Department of French would
require a Graduate secretary (bilingual); a part-time position is being requested as part of the
Department's staffing requirements.
b)
Faculty: the current Graduate Faculty complement includes I Emeritus, 1 Full,
5
• ?
Associate, 3 Assistant Professors. The complete
curricula vitae
of active Graduate faculty are
attached to this document (Appendix D). One new faculty position, granted in 1991, has been
• frozen. The proposed curriculum revisions are based on the current complement of faculty
actively involved in Graduate Studies. Collaboration with appropriate faculty in the Faculty of
Education with respect to a graduate curriculum for FSL is under development.
.
?
7
/

 
c)
Library: library resources have supported the existing curriculum, although sdñie............
aspects of literary study have required that faculty rely heavily on the UBC resources. The
Library Assessment of the New course proposals is attached to this program proposal
(Appendix A).
d)
Capital costs attributable to the new program are nominal, involving incorporation of
graduate filing and clerical operations into the Department's main office (the part-time
secretary shared with the Linguistics Department is currently housed, along with all files and
equipment, in the Linguistics Department) - the present budget is shared with the Linguistics
Department.
e)
Faculty research awards (over $5000) in the department: two faculty members
(Fauquenoy, Steele) currently hold major research awards, one from SSHRC ($69,380 over 3
years) and the other a New Faculty Research Fellowship ($6,000); the latter has an
application pending with SSI-IRC for additional funding ($2000) for a graduate research
assistant. Another applieation (Wrenn) f8r major rese&eh
fdndii1g
fô11i
SSI IRe,
ad
a -
potential souree of funding for graduate students, is under development.-
4. ?
IMPLEMENTATION
The proposed required introductory courses would be offered for the first time in Fall
93, for incoming students, and will then be scheduled in the Fall and Spring semesters as
required. The first course (FREN800/801), a semester of readings culminating in an oral
examination, has no vector, faculty responsibility consists of supervision as required, and
administering of the oral examination at the end of the semester (two Faculty members for
each examination: the student's Temporary Supervisor and one other). The second course
(FREN802) has a vector of 0-1-0, and will be taught jointly by two Faculty members, one
literature and one linguistics (each one responsible for one-half of the semester).
Most of the curriculum already exists, courses are scheduled for the coming academic
year as part of the existing program, and candidates are being admitted as in past years. The
proposed new courses would be incorporated into the existing curriculum, and scheduled
according to procedures already employed.
4a. PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS
Given current faculty dispositions in the department, it is possible to envisage a
constant enrollment of some 12 - 15 students within the next three to five years. At the
moment, 15 students (representing new and terminal students) appears to represent a maximal
situation.
8
.
/3

 
I
5.
?
SUMMARY OF CURRICULUM CHANGES
SUMMARY OF ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED
.
DEPARTMENT OF FRENCH
French Calendar Entry
French Graduate Program Requirements
a)
Delete PhD requirements; replace with PhD by Special Arrangements
b)
Delete Master of Arts - Teaching of French
c)
Master of Arts - changes in requirements:
i) ?
add option "without Thesis" (course work and "field" examination)
- ii)
add -
to Coursejuirements: FREN800/801,
iii) ?
add to Course requirements: area of concentration (literature or
linguistics or FSL)
New Course Proposals
FREN800-2
FREN8O1 -2
FREN8O2-2
L
FREN823-5
FREN824-5
FREN825-5
FREN826-5
FREN83O-5
FRENH3 1-5
FREN832-5
Course Change Proposals
FREN807-5 Credit Hours and Calendar Description
FREN808-5 Credit Hours and Calendar Description
FREN809-5 Credit Hours and Calendar Description
FREN8II-5 Credit Hours and Calendar Description
FREN812-5 Credit Hours and Calendar Description
FREN8I3-5 Credit Hours and Calendar Description
FREN8I4-5 Credit Hours and Calendar Description
FREN8
15-5
Credit Hours and Calendar Description
(Continued...)
is
/L/

 
Course Change Proposals (Continued)
FREN816-5
Credit Hours and Calendar Description
FREN817-5
Credit Hours and Calendar Description
FREN818-5
Credit Hours and Calendar Description
FREN820-5
Credit Hours and Calendar Description
FREN821-5
Credit Hours and Calendar Description
FREN822-5
Credit Hours and Calendar Description
S
.
10

 
6. ?
PROPOSED CALENDAR ENTRY
Graduate Program in French
The Department of French offers opportunities for graduate research leading to the
MA degree, with a concentration in either French Linguistics or French Literature. Students
interested in French as a Second Language (FSL) should contact the Graduate Program Chair.
(This option will be of particular interest to candidates contemplating a career in the teaching
of French.).
Students seeking admission to a PhD program may apply under the Special
Arrangements provisions of the
Graduate General Regulations
(section 1.3.4).
?
- - ?
-
The major areas of study are:
Linguistics:
Linguistic analysis of French, varieties of French (social, regional and stylistic
variations), French creoles, French linguistic theories, French applied linguistics, theoretical
approaches to the acquisition of French as a second language. A variety of practical
applications of linguistic theory may be envisaged: pedagogy, translation, stylistic analysis,
etc.
• ?
Literature:
The literature option offers a unique curriculum based on theoretical and
interdisciplinary approaches to literature and para-literature: i.e. textual, discourse, genre
analysis; cultural and gender studies; theory of literary criticism; psychological, sociological
criticism, new trends in the history of movements and historical periods, topics in French-
Canadian literature.
MA PROGRAM
Conditions of Admission
Candidates for admission must satisfy the general admission requirements for graduate
studies
(see sections 1.3.2 and 1.3.8 of the
Graduate General Regulations).
Clear admission into the program requires a good background in French Literature or
in French Linguistics, as well as a good command of both oral and written French.
Candidates who do not meet those conditions will be required to remedy the deficiency before
admission into the graduate program can be granted; this may be accomplished through one
or two semesters as a Qualifying Student (see section 1.3.5 of the
Graduate General
Regulations).
.
11
"7

 
Upon acceptance in the program, each student will be assigned a Temporary
supervisor.
The program offers the possibility of completing the degree requirements "with
Thesis" or "without Thesis". In either case, the student will work under the direction of a
Supervisory Committee (see section 1.6 of the
Graduate General Regulations), to
be
appointed by the end of the second semester. The student's program of course work, as well
as thesis topic or area of field examination must be approved by the Supervisory committee.
Degree Requirements:
The MA program has the following minimum requirements:
1)
Successful completion of:
FREN800-2 or FREN80I-2 taken during the first semester of enrollment,
and
FREN802-2 taken during the first or second semester of enrollment
2)
Successful completion of an additional 20 semester hours of graduate coursework
selected, for each concentration, from the FREN courses listed below:
Linguistics: 807, 808, 809, 811, 812, 813, 814,
815,
816, 817, 818, 830, 831, 832.
?
0
or
Literature: 820, 821, 822, 823, 824, 825, 826.
Upon the approval of the supervisory committee, one course from the other concentration may
be substituted, or, one course may be taken outside the department. For a concentration in
linguistics, students able to demonstrate adequate preparation in General Linguistics may wish
to consider taking a course in the Linguistics Department. For a concentration in literature,
students may wish to consider taking a course in the English Department. For a concentration
in French as a Second Language (FSL), course selection will be subject to the approval of the
Graduate Program Committee.
3)
One of the following:
a)
MA with Thesis - a thesis of about 100 pages on a topic acceptable to the
supervisory committee, defended at an oral examination as described in section 1.9
and 1.10 of the Graduate General Regulations, or
b)
MA without Thesis - successful completion of a further 10 semester hours of
graduate coursework within the Department of French and a written field examination
L

 
M
?
£
?
based on three of the courses taken. These additional courses may be selected from
either concentration. Preparation
for
the field examination will be undertaken
on the
advice of the Supervisory Committee.
Language requirement:
All students must demonstrate a level of competence in written and oral French acceptable to
the Graduate Program Committee. They are also expected to show at least a reading
knowledge of one language other than English or French that is acceptable to the student's
supervisory committee. This requirement can be fulfilled either by having successfully
completed two courses in that language or by passing a special examination consisting of the
translation of a 250-word text into English.
(;raduate Courses
Required Courses:
FREN802-2 and
either
FREN800-2 or FREN801-2 are required of all
students. They are
offered on a regular basis.
FREN800-2
Readings
in French
Linguistics
• ?
A semester of required readings in French linguistic theory. This course, which culminates in
an oral examination, will be graded Satisfactory
I
Unsatisfactory.
FREN801-2 Readings in Literary Theory
A semester of required readings in French literary theory. This course, which culminates in an
oral examination, will be graded Satisfactory / Unsatisfactory.
FREN802-2 Basic Research Methods
The study of research methods and tools used in French linguistics or French literature.
Planning a long-term research project. Graded Satisfactory / Unsatisfactory.
Core Courses:
The following courses treat fundamental aspects (in linguistics and literature) of the student's
chosen field of specialization. These courses are all offered at least once every six semesters.
Selection of and need to take any specific course or courses is decided in consultation with
the student's supervisor.
Linguistics
FREN807-5
Problems
in
French Phonology
Explores a selection of classic problems of French phonology from different theoretical
viewpoints.
I ^

 
I
FREN808-5 Problems in French Grammar
Explores a selection of classic problems of French morphology, morpho-syntax and/or syntax
from different theoretical viewpoints.
FREN809-5 Problems in French Semantics and Lexicology
Theories, methods and major research trends in the diachronic and/or synchronic analysis of
the lexicon and structures of meaning in French.
Literature
FREN820-5 Types of Discourse
A study of the language in use, discourse strategies, the enunciation devices
of various types
of texts, both traditional and non-traditional genres such as oral or para-literary texts.
FREN821-5 Theories and Methods of Literary Analysis
A study of a selection of significant works by contemporary French critics (Barthes, Genette,
Kristeva ... ). The application of their theories and models to the analysis of specific works.
May concentrate on one area, e.g. narratology, semiotics, etc.
FREN822-5 Socio-cultural Approaches to French Literature
Provides a framework for a detailed study of French literature within its sociocultural context.
Specialized courses:
The courses listed below treat specialized areas with respect to the student's particular
These
interests
specialized
or thesis topic.courses
?
are
-
?
offered as needed to complete or to enhance a student's
0
program of coursework. Depending upon content and upon enrollment, they may be offered
as directed readings courses or as seminars rather than lecture courses.
Linguistics/Applied Linguistics
FREN811-5 Problems in French Dialectology
Methods in the study of social and geographical dialects (from fieldwork techniques to the
analysis of data). Linguistic theory (traditional, structural, generative and sociolinguistic) as it
applies to French dialectology.
FREN812-5 Problems in French Linguistic Theory
Studies the contributions of a selection of twentieth-century French-language linguists to the
evolution of various aspects of linguistics and linguistic theory.
FREN813-5 Problems in the History of French
A diachronic study of a variety of phonological, grammatical or lexical aspects of French
presenting descriptive/explanatory challenges.
FREN814-5 Contrastive Structures of French and English
A contrastive study of the grammatical structures of French and English with emphasis on
'rank-shift' across discourse techniques. A variety of practical applications may be envisaged:
pedagogy, translation, stylistic analysis, etc.
14
Iq

 
FREN815-5 French Creoles
Development, diversity and sociality of French Creoles. Theoretical approaches to the study
of the life cycle of creole languages, with special emphasis on French-based creoles.
FREN8I6-5 Sociolinguistic Approaches to French Studies
Language, society and identity in France. Study of social markers in speech, conversational
rules, objective versus subjective norms, attitudes towards language variation and their
implications among French speakers from an integrative perspective.
FREN8I7-5 French Applied Linguistics
Study of the contribution of linguistic theory to the teaching and learning of French as a
second language.
FREN8I8-5 Phonostylistics of French
The linguistic analysis of paralinguistic features of French and their expressivity in various
types of oral discourse.
FREN830-5 Canadian French
--
AdvindUd iftheiiniiisTi ?
und sociolinguistic rules of French in Canada.
FREN83I-5 Studies of Bilingualism in the French-Speaking World
Theories of bilingualism as they apply to French and the place of French in the world.
FREN832-5 Theoretical Approaches to the Acquisition of French as a Second Language
New trends and theoretical developments in the acquisition of French as a second language.
Literature:
Topics in the following literature courses will vary to meet the interests of both students and
• ?
faculty.
FREN823-5 Interdisciplinary approaches to French Literature
Explores the relationships between French literature and the other arts or applies concepts and
models developed in other disciplines to the study of French literature.
FREN824-5 Topics in French Canadian Literature
An in-depth study of a theme or an aspect of French-Canadian Literature through different
literary works.
FREN825-5 Topics in French Literature
An in-depth study of a topic relating to a period or a movement in French literary history,
such as: Middle Ages, Renaissance, Classical period, Enlightenment, Romanticism, Realism,
Naturalism, Existentialism.
FREN826-5 Monographic Studies
An in-depth study of one writer, from a particular theoretical perspective\(psychological,
historical, linguistic).
FREN898 ?
MA
Thesis
FREN999 ?
Field Examinations
.
?
15
ORA

 
7. ?
NEW COURSES
RATIONALE FOR NEW COURSE PROPOSAL
DEPARTMENT OF FRENCH
FREN800
-2:
Readings in French Linguistics
FREN801-2: Readings in Literary Theory
RATIONALE:
Successful candidates for admission to the old program have had a good command of the
French language, and an adequate descriptive knowledge of the language and/or of
francophone literature and culture. However, the theoretical framework used (or not used) in
undergraduate French programs varies widely across North American universities. In order to
undertake research in French linguistics or literature they need to possess a coherent and
homogeneous preparation in the respective fields of linguistics or literature.
The objective of these courses is to remedy this deficiency: a limited, and fixed bibliography
of "classics", the works of major scholars that have in some way shaped the field, of which
knowledge is assumed, or on whose methodology contemporary linguistic or literary analysis
is based.
FREN802-2: Basic Research Methods
RATIONALE:
Students are expected in a 13-week semester to produce an original research paper in a
subject area that they may be studying for the first time. The addition of a course in research
methodologies will enable them, in their other courses, to concentrate on the subject matter
and spend less time on the mechanics of the preparation of a research paper.
These courses will be graded Satisfactory / Unsatisfactory
16
?
)I

 
I
?
I
.
NEWRADUATE COURSE PROPOSAL FORM
Calendar Information:
Department: French
?
Course #:800
Title: ?
Readings in French Linguistics
Description: A semcsur of required readings in French linguistic theory. This course, which culminates in
an oral examination, will be graded Satisfatcory
I
Unsatisfactory
Credit Hrs:2
?
Vector. 0-0-0
?
Prerequisite(s), if any:
__Enr p
ljment and Scheduling:
Estimated Enrollment: 5-6
?
When will the course first be offered: 93-3
How often will the course be offered: every semester, as required by new enrollments
Justification: ?
This course is compulsory fro all students in a Master's Program in French Linguistics
whether Thesis option or No-Thesis option. In order to take courses and to do research in French linguistics
students need to start with a coherent and homogeneous knowledge of what the discipline involves.
Which Faculty member will usually teach the course: (See Course outline)
What are the budgetary implications of mounting the course: (See Course outline)
Are there sufficient library resources (append details):
Appended ?
a) ?
Outline of the course
b)
?
An indication of the competence of the Faculty member to
give the course
C )
?
Library resourcesApproved:
Approval:
?
.
Departmental Graduate Committee:
_
?
L
Ut4
J'i.
W'A&L ?
Date:
A
r
j
(b
11
Faculty Graduate Committee;
?
Date:
?
2S
_LT 3
Faculty: ?
EiII__
?
-'
?
Date:/'i
Senate Graduate Committe

 
DEPARTMENT OF FRENCH ?
Graduate Studies
FRENSOO-2
Readings in French Linguistics
Course outline:
A semester of required readings in French linguistic theory to serve as a preliminary to
graduate research in the chosen field. The Reading List represents a limited bibliography of
"classics", the works of major scholars that have in some way shaped the field, of which
knowledge Is
assumed, or on whose methodology contemporary linguistic analysis is based.
This course must be taken. in the first semester of enrollment in the program, however,
FREN802-2 may be taken concurrently, as may one other course. There are no contact hours,
and the reading list will be supplied upon acceptance into the program, to permit the student
to undertake this requirement without delay. At the end of the first semester in the program,
the student will be examined on the content of the reading list, in an oral examination to be
conducted by at least two members of the graduate faculty, who will be available during the
semester for consultation.
The course will
be graded
Satisfactory / Unsatisfactory.
Bibliography: see Reading List attached.
18

 
I
Ir-
?
NEW GRADUATE COURSE PROPOSAL FORM
L
Department: French
?
Course #:801
Title:
?
Readings in French Literature
Description: A semester of required readings in French literary theory. This course, which culminates in an
oral examination, will be graded Satisfatcory /Unsatisfac tory
Credit Hrs: 2
?
Vector. 0-0-0
?
Prerequisite(s), if any:
Enrollment and Scheduling
Estimated Enrollment: 5-6
?
When will the course first be offered: 93-3
How often will the course be offered: every semester, as required by new enrollments
Justifica1in: ?
This course is compulsory fro all students in a Master's Program in French Literature
whether Thesis option or No-Thesis option. In order to take courses and to do research in French literature
students need to start with a coherent and homogeneous knowledge of what the discipline involves.
S
Which Faculty member will usually teach the course: (See Course outline)
What are the budgetary implications of mounting the course: (See Course outline)
Are there sufficient library resources (append details):
Appended:-
?
a) ?
Outline of the course
b) ?
An indication of the competence of the Faculty member to
give the course
C)
?
Library resourcesApprove.d
Approval:
Departmental Graduate Committee:
?
D ate
- ?
ate: ?
i( q
Faculty Graduate
Faculty
S
?
Senate Graduate

 
DEPARTMENT OF FRENCH
?
Graduate Studies
FREN8O
1-2
Readings in Literary Theory
Course outline:
A semester of required readings in French literary theory, to serve as a preliminary to
graduate research in the chosen field. The Reading List is a limited bibliography of "classics",
the works of major scholars that have in some way shaped the field, of which knowledge is
assumed, or on whose methodology contemporary literary analysis is based.
This course must be taken in the first semester of enrollment in the program, however,
FREN802-2 may be taken concurrently, as may one other course. There are no contact hours,
and the reading list will be supplied upon acceptance into the program, to permit the student
to undertake this requirement without delay. At the end of the first semester in the program,
the student will be examined on the content of the reading list, in an oral examination to be
conducted by at least two members of the graduate faculty, who will be available during the
semester for consultation.
The course will
be graded
Satisfactory / Unsatisfactory.
Bibliography: see Reading List attached
20
S

 
N
ew Graduate Course Proposal Form
çNDAR INFORMATION
Department:
French ?
Course number:
?
802
Title:
Basic Research Methods
Description:
The study of research methods and tools used in French
linguistics or French literature. Planning a long-term research
project.
credit Hours: 2
?
Vector: 0-10
?
Prerequisite(s) if any:
none
Estimated Enrollment: 5-6
?
When will the course first be offered: 93-3
How often will the course be offered:
Fall and Spring, as required by
new enrolments.
JUSTIFICATION This course is compulsory for all students
enrolled in a Master's program in French, whether Thesis option or
No-Thesis option. It will provide the basic methodological tools
for the planning and organizing of research papers and/or thesis.
RE S OU RCES
Which Faculty member will normally teach the course:
Any
What are the budgetary implications of mounting the course:
None
Are there sufficient Library resources (append details)
Appended: a) Outline of the Course
b)
An indication of the competence of the Faculty member
to give the course
c)
Library resources
Approved: ?
Departmental Graduate Committ
?
h/14,i
/i .
kI.iA-
Faculty Graduate comndttee
?
Date
Faculty:_'
K
?
Date4Z
53
Senate Graduate Committee
?
Date:
Date
Senate:
Ii!

 
DEPARTMENT OF FRENCH
?
FREN8O2-2
Basic Research Methods
Instructor: ?
Faculty (Linguistics) and/or Faculty (Literature)
Course Outline:
The aim of this course is to teach the student how to plan and undertake a research
project and/or a thesis. It will first focus on bibliographical matters: how to plan a library
search; which sources should be consulted; how the material should be classified and
analysed. The student will also be asked to write and present a research project description
(an
état present),
including a critical bibliography, on a topic chosen in consultation with the
course chair.
Finally, the student will learn to apply a style sheet appropriate to his chosen
discipline.
Organisation and evaluation:
The student's presentation will count for 30% of the final grade, and the projA description
and bibliography for 70%
Final grade will be Satisfactory
I
Unsatisfactory
Bibliography
Barzun, Jacques & Henry Graff (1985)
The Modern Researcher.
San Diego: Harcourt, Brace
Jovanovich. (4th ed.) (D 13 B334 1985)
Béaud, Michel (1988)
L'Art de la these.
Montréal: Boréal Express.
Calais, Etienne et al (1992)
Dc la mCthode: Epreuves de culture gCnérale et de philosophic.
Paris: Ellipses.
Deshaies, Bruno (1992)
Méthodologie de la recherche
en
sciences /zumaines.
Montréal:
Beauchemin.
Laflèche, Guy (1977)
Petit manuel des etudes littéraires.
Montréal: VLB Editeur.
22

 
RATIONALE FOR NEW COURSE PROPOSAl.
1)E1 3
ARTMEN1' OF FRENCH
FREN823-5 Interdisciplinary Approaches to French Literature
FREN824-5 Topics in French Canadian Literature
FREN825-5 Topics in French Literature
FREN826-5
Monographic Studies
The French component of the old graduate program in Languages and Linguistics provided
only limited options for study in literary analysis (three courses added in recent years to the
original French linguistics program). Recent additions to faculty permit expanding offerings in
- French _Literature to give it equal status _with
th
e
jguistics compone
n
t, _and
_offerstuefl5
not only a choice of concentration (Linguistics or Literature) but also a choice within the
Literature option.
FREN830-5 Canadian French
FREN83I-5
Studies of Bilingualism in the French-Speaking World
FREN832-5 Theoretical Approaches to the Acquisition of French as a Second Language
The addition of these courses complements existing offerings in French Linguistics, and
• reflects the evolution
in
Faculty members' research interests. The choice of topics is intended
to provide greater options
in
Linguistics research,
as
well as facilitate the tailoring of courses
in
Linguistics
and
Literature to the FSL option, compensating for the deletion of the Master
of Arts - Teaching of French.
n
23
^
Fr

 
NEW GRADUATE COURSE PROPOSAL FORM
Calendar Information:
Department: French
?
Course f!: 823
Title: Interdisciplinary Approaches to French Literature
Description: Explores the relationships between French literature and the other arts or applies concepts
and models developed in other disciplines to the study of French literature.
Credit Hrs: S
?
Vector: 0-3-0 ?
Prerequisite(s), if any:
Enrollment and Scheduling:
Estimated Enrollnent: 5-10
?
When will the course first be offered: See proposal, page 3
Flow often will the course be offered: See proposal, page 5
Justification:
Graduate course offerings in French Literature have been selected to reflect major critical trends in literary
criticism. This course will enable the student to approach French literature in the con
?
of other arts or
disciplines, and explore the relationships between literary texts and other works of art.
Resources:
? -
Which Faculty member will usually teach the course: Visvanathan, Davison, Merler
What are the budgetary implications of mounting the course: See proposal, page 5
Are there sufficient library resources (append details): See Appendix A, Library Report
Appended: ?
a) ?
Outline of the course
b)
?
An indication of the competence of the Faculty member to
give the course
C) ?
Library resourcesApproved:
Approval:
'Departmental
Faculty Graduate
Graduate
Committee:
Committee-0
?
QL_
t -_--.
Date:
Date:
?
k
93
tq -
b
r
I
I93
uaLer''i
_'-
?
I—
Senate Graduate Committee:
''
Date:
?
C'
Senate: ?
Date:__________________
Arts 92-3
?
.
P CI

 
I
?
Calendar Information:
?
NEW GRADUATE COURSE PROPOSAL FM
Department French ?
Course #: 824
Title: Topics in French Canadian Literature
Description: An in-depth study of a theme or an aspect of French Canadian Literature through different
literary works.
Credit Hrs: 5
?
Vector: 0-3-0
?
Prerequisite(s), if any:
Enrollment and Scheduling:
-----Estimated-Enrollment: --5-1 0-- ?
—When-will-the-course first- be-offcred-----See-proposal,-page -5
How often will the course be offered:
?
See proposal, page 5
Justification:
The student will have the opportunity, in this course, to study French Canadian Literature
from
a specific
and original point of view. Unlike traditional literary approaches that deal with movements or historical
periods, this course studies what may be a variety of literary genres or a number of authors from different
periods where the theme or goal of the texts represents the common element.
L
?
Resources:
Which Faculty member will usually teach the course: Poirier, Merler, Viswanat.han
What are the budgetary implications of mounting the course:
See Proposal, Page
5
Are there sufficient library resources (append details): See Appendix A, Library Report
Appended: ?
a) ?
Outline of the course
b)
?
An indication of the competence of the Faculty member to
give the course
C )
?
Library resourcesApproved:
?
- *
Approval:
Departmental Graduate Commiuer) ?
Date: ?
I
& / ')
Faculty Graduate Committees
?
Date: ?
13 -.
Faculty:__
?
._Date:
/
Senate Graduate
Senate:_ Date*
____________________
.
?
Arts 92-3
IP

 
LI
DEPARTMENT OF FRENCH
?
El
FREN824-5?
Topics in French Canadian Literature
Writing from the Margins:
?
New Voices in Literary Discourse
Instructor:
?
Dr. Guy Poirier
Since the Quiet Revolution, many powerless groups (women, the
poor) or minorities (Jewish people, immigrants, gays and lesbians,
etc.) within the French-Canadian minority have spoken out, tried
to express their feelings or find their identity.
In this course, we will explore different types of discourses
and themes used by authors writing from or for those multiple
"solitudes".
Course reauirements: Students will present oral reports on the
themes chosen for study and a final paper presenting the results
of original research.
Evaluation:
Oral reports and participation in seminars
?
40%
Research paper
?
40%
Final examination
?
20%
Procrarn:
Part I: ?
"To write for, about the poor":
The Parti Pris experience
André Major,
Le Cabochon,
Montréal: Parti pris, 1964.
Jacques Renaud,
Le
Cassé,
Montréal: Parti pris, 1964.
Laurent Girouard,
La y
ule
inhurnaine,
Montréal: Parti pris,
1964.
(all, in SFU
Library)
3t
.
.

 
I
Calendar Information:
Department: French
Course #: 825
I
?
I
NEW
GRADUATE COURSE PROPOSAL FORM
L
Title: Topics in French Literature
Description: An in-depth study of a topic relating to a period or a movement in French literary history, such as:
Middle Ages, Renaissance, Classical Period, Enlightenment, Romanticism, Realism, Naturalism,Existentiaiisrn.
Credit His: S
?
Vector: 0-3-0
?
Prerequisite(s), if any:
Enrollment and Scheduling:
Estimated Enrollment: 5-10
?
When will the course first be offered: See proposal, page 5
How often will tile course be offered
?
See proposal, page 5
justification:
This course examines a specific period or movement in French literature and provides a background for more
detailed study of an author or literary work or trend.
Resources:
Which Faculty member will usually teach the course: Davison, Poirier, Merler, Steele, Viswanathan
What are the budgetary implications of mounting the course: See Proposal, Page 5
Are there sufficient library resources (append details): See Appendix A, Library Report
Appended: ?
a)
?
Outline of the course
b) ?
An indication of the competence of the Faculty member to
give the course
C )
?
Library resourcesApproved:
Approval:
'Departmental Graduate Committe:
T
PQ..
Ll---- ti
?
Date: ?
- ?
t.
\C13
Faculty Graduate Committee
?
a4Pfl/7-A
?
Date:
lj129,
3
Faculty: ??
-
Date:
_
5_ AE'
_
5_/
Senate Graduate Committee:
?
-
?
-
?
2.-¼
Senate; ?
_
Date:____________________
Arts 92-3

 
DEPARTMENT OF FRENCH
FREN8 25-5
Topics in French Literature
Instructor: Rosena Davison
The French Enlightenment:
-
Literature, ph&iQQphy and Je0
Course objectives: The aim of this course is to provide an
overall view of the French Enlightenment and its literary and
philosophic importance, with special emphasis being given to the
development of pedagogical thought.
Evaluation: This will be based on in-class oral reports on texts
in both bibiliographieS (60%), and on a research paper on a
specific author or aspect of his/her theories (40%).
Course outline:
I.
Introduction to the main literary and philosophical movements
of the eighteenth century, and to the circumstances which caused
changes to current thinking. Situate pilosoPhes (Voltaire,
Diderot, Rousseau, Helvétius) in their historical and cultural
context. L'Encyclopédie, its aims, importance and sphere of
influence.
II.
The philosoohes' contributions to the evolution of ideas.
Means at their disposal for diffusion of their ideas: books,
journals, salons, schools. Effect of censorship.
III.
Teaching in eighteenth-century France: schools, colleges,
academies, private education. The Jesuits. Texts used. John
Locke. Philoso
p
hes' contribution to pedagogical theories.
IV.
Rousseau, Emile: importance of his ideas and impact on his
contemporaries and successors.
V.
Diderot: several texts (see reading list).
VI.
Women's education: Mine d'Epinay and her contemporaries.
VII.
The French Revolution. Dreams come true?
S
0

 
NEW
GRADUATE COURSE PROPOSAL FORM
Calendar
lnfonng(in
Department: French
?
Course Th
826
Title: Monographic Studies
Description: An in-depth study of one writer from a specific theoretical perspective (psychological,
historical, linguistic)
?
Credit Hrs: 5
?
Vector: 0-3-0
?
Prerequisite (s), if any:
gnrollmcnt ant! Scheduling:
Estimated Enrollment: 5-10
?
When will the course
first
be offered: See proposal, page
S
-
?
How often will the course be offered:
?
See proposal, page 5
jjficnIion:
This course will enable the student to apply a specific theoretical methodology to the detailed study of one
author. It is complementary to other courses in which a variety of methododogies and/or authors may be
studied.
RcnrCeS
Which Faculty member
will
usually teach the course: Davison, Merler, Poirier, Steele
What are the budgetary implications of mounting the course: See Proposal, Page 5
Are there sufficient library resources (append details): See Appendix A, Library Report
?
?
Appcnde&
?
a)
?
Outline of the course
b)
An indication of the competence of the Faculty member to
give the course
c)
Library resourcesApproved:
?
Approval:
DepamenL
?
Graduate Committee:
Date
:_
*
Faculty Graduate Coin mittees_
Date:
1/
1/
Faculty:
Senate C
_________________________________________________________________________________
Senate: ?
Date:
• ?
Arts 92-3
3L1

 
c
l-
p.
DEPARTMENT OF FRENCH
FREN826-5
Monographic Studies
The Teleological Implications of a Text and of Behaviour?
(Stendhal and Adler)
Instructor:
?
Dr. Grazia Merler
Course Content and General Objectives:
Stendhal's prediction that he would be famous fifty years after his death has proven
accurate. Much has been written about Stendhal since 1842, indeed these writings reflect the
very history of literary criticism (from historical to biographical to thematic to sociological to
structural to linguistic). For the purpose of this course we will concentrate on a psychological
approach. Analytical psychology (Jung) and psychoanalysis (Freud) have produced the largest
critical body in this perspective. We will use both the fictional and the non fictional texts of
Stendhal to analyze them in a
new
perspective, that of Individual Psychology, founded by Alfred
Adler. We will compare our findings with those of the other two schools.
The objective of the course is to find commonalitiës between the inherent logic of a text
(be it in the sequencing of its narrative structures or in the presentation of various fictive
characters), and the "private logic", "fictive goals" of human behaviour. In this perspective, some
characters of fiction which have often been considered contradictory or mad or afflicted with a
specific fixation, can in fact be explained in perhaps more humane ways than has the
psychanalytic analysis.
This course will concentrate on one/two novels:
Le Rouge et le noir; La Chartreuse de
Parme,
and other non-fictional texts:
Dc I'Amour; Vie de Henri Brulard; Histoire de la peinture
en Italie; Mémoires d' un touriste; Vies de Haydn, de Mozart, de Métasra.se.
(The complete works of Stendhal are available in the library.)
C6urse Requirements and Gradin
g
Structure:
The student will be expected to complete weekly assignments and a term paper. Grade
distribution
is 40% for weekly assignments and 60% for the 'final paper.
.
0
/_^
7
of-

 
NEW GRADUATE COURSE PROPOSAL FORM
Calendar information;
W ?
Department: French ?
Course #: 830
Title: Canadian French
Description: Advanced study of the linguistic structures and sociolinguistic rules of French in Canada.
Credit Hrs: 5
?
Vector: 0-3-0
?
Prerequisite(s), if any:
Enrollment and Scheduling:
-- ?
—Estimated-Enrollmcnt:—i-2 ?
Whcn-will-the-course-first-be-offered:–when-required
How often will the course be offered: On demand
Justification:
The extent and importance of research on Canadian French cannot be dealt with satisfactorily within our
existing graduate offerings and it warrants the addition of a new course which will be the continuation and
intensification of the material covered in French 422-3 Canadian French.
Resources:
Which Faculty member will usually teach the course: Fauquenoy, Wrenn
What are the budgetary implications of mounting the course:
Are there sufficient library resources (append details): See appendix A,
Library Report
Appended: ?
a)
?
Outline of the course
b)
An indication of the competence of the Faculty member to
give the course
c)
Library resourcesApproved:
Approval:
Departmental Graduate Commi ' ?
1A,{ ?
-
ah-CAA
A_ -. ?
Date:
4>_t
161 q)
Date
2'4/
2!- 573
Faculty Graduate Co
mmi ttees
___ ?
: _______________
Faculty: ._.-'&.
?
t ?
Date:
Senate Graduate Committe ?
Date: ?
1/4)
Senate: ?
Date:____________________
Arts 92-3

 
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
?
.
DEPARTMENT OF FRENCH
FRENCH 830-5:
CANADIAN FRENCH
INSTRUCTOR: Dr. Marguerite Fauquenoy
CALENDAR DESCRIPTION:
Advanced study of the linguistic structures and sociolinguistic rules of
French in Canada.
COURSE CONTENT:
This course discusses issues and research pertinent to the situation of
French in Canada. It focuses on the notions of "norm" and "variation" from
a linguistic and sociolinguistic perspective, with a special emphasis on
Quebec French. Topics will include phonological norms, grammatical
norms, lexical norms, social styles, social dialects and regional varieties,
systems of address and attitudes towards variation.
GR ADTN:
The student will be required to write an extended essay on one topic of
his choice related to the course content (40%) as well as prepare an
annotated bibliography on another aspect of the program (20%). In- class
oral reports on the readings will count for 40%.
S

 
NEW GRADUATE COURSE PROPOSAL FORM
. ?
Calendar Information:
?
Department: French
?
Course
Th 831
Title: Studies of Bilingualism in the French-Speaking World
Description: Theories of bilingualism as they apply to French, and the place of French in the world.
Credit Hrs: 5 ?
Vector: 0-3-0
?
Prerequisite(s), if any:
Enrollment and Scheduling:
Estimated Enrollment: 1-2
?
When will the course first be offered: when required
-How-often-will-the-coursc-be-offered:—on-demand
Justification:
While most of our graduate offerings concentrate on the linguistic and sociolinguistic study of French as the.
sole language of a community, the need exists for the description of situations where French is not the only
means of linguistic communication, that is the study of problems of bilingualism as they arise from
language contacts and language conflicts.
. ?
Resources:
Which Faculty member will usually teach the course: Fauquenoy
What are the budgetary implications of mounting the course:
Are there sufficient library resources (append details): See appendix
A,
Library Report
Appended:
?
a)
?
Outline of the course
b)
An indication of the competence of the Faculty member to
give the course
c)
Library resourcesApproved
Departmental Graduate Committc),}
?
1fL
/. LJ-t.w._-
Date: ?
/
i'/ 41
Faculty Graduate Coffimiuee
?
Date: ?
2
f5 ?
Faculty
Senate Graduate
Senate:
?
Date:____________________
. ?
Arts 92-3
4

 
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
DEPARTMENT OF FRENCH
FRENCH 831-5:
?
STUDIES OF BILINGUALISM
IN THE FRENCH SPEAKING WORLD
INSTRUCTOR: Dr. Marguerite Fauquenoy
CALENDAR DESCRIPTION:
Theories of bilingualism as they apply to French and the place of French
in the world. (COURSE CONTENT:
This course surveys current research concerning the situation of French as
the second international language in the world. In most countries, French is
in contact with other languages, therefore in a bilingual context. The
program will start with an overview of the historical background explaining
the contemporary status of French in the world and explore attitudes and
policies in France and abroad, language contacts and conflicts, and the
notion of "Francophonie". Topics will include: state vs individual
bilingualism, language choice, code-switching and accommodation theory
(where French is one of the options in the bilingual setting).
GRADING:
The student will be required to write an extended essay on one topic of
his choice related to the course content (40%),. as well as prepare an
annotated bibliography on another aspect of the program (20%). In- class
oral reports on the readings will count for 4001o.
is
W";

 
NEW GRADUATE COURSE PROPOSAL FORM
Calendar Information:
?
Department: French
?
Course I: 832
?
Tide: Theoretical Approaches to the Acquisition of French as a Second Language
Description: New trends and theoretical developments in the acquisition of French as a second language.
Credit Hrs:
5 ?
Vector: 0-3-0
?
Prerequisite(s), if any:
Enrollment and Sche(luling:
Estimated Enrollment: 1-2 ?
When will the course first be offered: when required
?
How often
will
the course be offered: on demand
Justification:
While French 817: French Applied linguistics focuses on the role of linguistic theory in the
teaching of French as a second language, this course will be more specifically oriented towards a social and
psychological perspective in the acquisition of French, as it is illustrated in the intensive research taking
place in the European Community.
. ?
Resources:
Which Faculty member will usually teach the course: Fauquenoy
What are the budgetary implications of mounting the course:
Are there sufficient library resources (append details): See appendix A, Library Report
Appended:
?
a)
?
Outline of the course
b)
An indication of the competence of the Faculty member to
give the course
c)
Library resourccsApprovcd:
Approval:
?
,
Departmental Graduate Committee: ?
i
i 1
(A1C '
f-i
AAJ. ?
- ?
Date:
AhJ
f(
Al
3
Faculty Graduate Committees_____________
Faculty:
?
- ? Date:/7
Senate Graduate Commiuee:
?
-
?
- _(._ ,--•-. ?
Date:_(-.-'_
Senate;
_Date:___________________
Arts 92-3
L
'V

 
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY ?
DEPARTMENT OF FRENCH
FRENCH 832-5:
THEORETICAL APPROACHES TO THE
?
ACQUISITION OF FRENCH AS A SECOND
?
LANGUAGE
INSTRUCTOR: Dr. Marguerite Fauquenoy
CALENDAR DESCRIPTION:
-New trends and theoretical developments in the acquisition of French as
a second language.
COURSE CONTENT:
This course will allow students to compare and evaluate traditional
approaches to the acquisition of French as a second language and more
recent theories based on a sociolinguistic perspective. Topics include first vs
second language acquisition theories, the role of motivation in language
acquisition, the linguistic continuum and the notion of interlanguage,
systems of learning, learning strategies, cognitive theories as they apply to
second language acquisition, communicative tasks vs learning tasks etc.
GRADING:
Students' performance will be assessed on the basis of their participation
in class discussions and their weekly oral reports, on their readings during
the semester
(50%),
and on an extended essay dealing with one aspect of the
program
(50%). ?
-
0
En
/%'2
-0,

 
MEMNDUM
W.A.C. Bennett Library, Simon Fraser University
?
Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Date:
?
28 July, 1.993
From: Ralph Stanton (Collections Management Office)
To: ?
Phyllis Wrenn, Graduate Program Chair, Department of
French
Re: ?
REVISED Graduate Curriculum Proposal, Library
Assessment
Thank-you for your memorandum of March 12, 1993. Here is our
assessment of the Librar
y
's needs in relation to the
following new courses:
French 800-2 Readings in French Linguistics
French 801-2 Basic Research methods
French 823-5 Interdisciplinary Approaches to French
Literature
I
. French
French
French
French
Fr: iich
L
1. c:1
Fr en c h
824-5 Topics in French Canadian Literature
825-5 Topics in French Literature
826-5 Monographic Studies
830-5 Canadian French
831-5 Studies of Bilingualism in the French-speaking
832-5 Theoretical Appr-:.aches to the Acquisition of
as a Second Language
PRICES
Current: book prices in this field are $47.10 per title.
CPECIAL TOPICS COURSES
The February 8, 1993 Senate motion on Library resources
states under item 3 Special topics courses which have no
previously been offered shall be presented to the Library
or an assessment of Library materials as early as
possible. For the purposes of this definition we think that
French 825-5, and 826-5 are special topics courses; should
.
?
the topic/s change the revised course outline and reading
list should be resubmitted to the Library so that we can
ensure that adequate resources are available.
401

 
SERIALS
?
.
We note that just 16 of the 189 reading list citations are
from serials (10 titles) . This is an unusuall
y
low number o
serials compared to other course assessments hut may
e
h
comDletely normal for the topics covered. The Librar
y
holds
8 of the 10 serials titles cited. The French Department
should confirm that the Librar
y
serials collection is
adeuate to Cover these courses since we will not be able to
add new serial titles from our funds.
PROFILE
There is no need to amend the current Library profile in
Linguistics Or Languages.
COURSES:
Th
i
s
Compulsory
2 credit hour course will first be offered
In 93-3 and ever
y
semester thereafter. It will have an
enrollment of 5-6 students.
There are 20 items in the reading list of which 8 are not in
the catalogue. Of those in the catalogue 4 are on loan and
shoiild have etra copies purchased. 12 books will
cost
$ 5 65 2 0.
There are no perodica1.s required.
French, 80i.-2 Bas i..c R-esearch methods
This compUlsor y
2 unit course will be offered for the first
ti.-me in
, 93-3 and as required after that. Estimated
enroiLmerit is 5-6..
There are 5 monographs rand no periodicals on the reading
lisc. Thtee titles are not in the catalogue:; they will cost
$14.l..3..
;French.823 -5, .Int.erdi.st1o1 ina.rv AoDroa'ches to French
.L itera'tur e
This cbursew.i.11 be offered ante every :56 •semesters 'to '5-10
Studen'ts."There are .22 items in the reading 1Is't ot which 1:8
are 'motiog.rh.s an 4 from periodicals.. 7 of the monograph
43

 
. ?
items are not in the catalogue and a further 2 are on loan
and require a second copy. The
cost
of 9 books is $423.90.
One serial cited is not in the collection, it is,
Le Journal
:madien de reclierches semiotiques.
The cost of this journal
including tax and binding is $73.26 and it is a recurring
Cost
French 824-5 Topics in French Canadian Literature
This course will have an estimated enrollment of 5-10
students. The date of first offering and frequency are not
y
et determined. The topics covered in this course will not
change significantly year by year.
There are 29 items in the bibliography, all are monographs.
5 items are not in the catalogue and 4 items are on loan, on
reserve or missing. The cost of 9 titles is $423.90.
French 825-5 Topics in French Literature
This course will be offered once every 5-6 semesters to
between 5 and 10 students. There are 8 topics suggested for
. ?
this course. One topic, The French Enlightenment has a 24
item reading list attached.
All items in the reading list are monographs, 9 are no-- in
the catalogue. The cost of this group is
$423.90.
We
( :
Ixpect: that the other seven topics noted in the ccu:e
)UC
Line will generate similar costs (minus the Dideroc :
the topic French Enlightenment. We consider that this caurse
falls into the category Special Topics Courses as noted on
page 1. Please notify the Library and send a revised
reading list when the topic changes.
French
826-5
M p no q r g
Dhic Studies
This course will provide an in-depth study of one write: per
offering, which will be once every 5-6 semesters with 3-10
students per offering. The reading list is constructed
around Adler and Stendhal and has 25 items, all but 2 are
monographs.. 5 of the items are not in the catalogue and a
further 5 are on loan and should have a second copy ordered.
The cost of the 10 items is $471.00.
The Library is concerned that similar costs could attach
?
themselves to other authors covered by future versions of
this course. We consider that this course falls into the
category Special Topics Courses as noted on page 1. Please
44

 
nOtify
the Librar
y
and send a revised reading list when the
topic changes.
French 830-5 Canadian French
This course will be offered on demand and will have an
enrollment of 1-2. 17 items are in the bibliography, 14 are
monographs of which 3 are not in the catalogue and 2 are on
loan and should have a second copy ordered. The cost of 5
titles is $235.50.
French 831-5 Studies of Bilin
g
ualism in the French-speaking
World
This course will be offered on demand to 1 or 2 students.
There are 29 items in the reading list. Of the 24 monographs
cited 14 are not in the catalogue and a further 6 are on
loan or missing and need added copies. 20 books will cost
$942.00.
French 832-5 Theoretical ADor
p
aches to the
ACfliiti
p n
o
French as a Second Language
This course will be offered on demand to 1-2 students. There
are 19 entries in the reading list. 9 monographs are noc in
the catalogue and a furtI-er three are on loan and need added
copies. The cost of 12 monographs is $565.20. The one serial
cited is not in the collection; it is
Journal of French
Langiage
Studies and its cost is $103.02 per year inctidinq
b
i n
d ing
and is a recurring cost.
.
L5

 
t.L.t
L:;
! ?
tt ?
ci ?
lien de re
'iii-1
ot H:ericli Langung
ToLi L Recurring
sCmiorj ?
73.26
$103
.02
Per Year ?
$176.28
LI
curring co:;L:; per course ía .L9 .53
p
er year
iie line coar a, Monograph:;
$41-9-L9-0
Totji 1.
?
$4, 191 .90
Lilflt? co::;t p-r course is $465. 76.
lIE FIJND T
Nr4 RHOIJIRED FOR THESE SDURSES IS $4, 191.90 (ONE
lCME
TRANSFER
ONLY)
FROM
AND
BASE)
$176.28 PER YEA-
::, ,
FOR NEW SUBSCRIPTIONS
THIS IS A REVISION OF AN ASSESSMENT FIRST COMPLETED ON APRIL
OR NOTE ON
?
REMOVE THE EARLIER ,VERSION FROM YOUR FILES
THE APRIL 15 VERSION THAT THIS REVISION EXISTS.
.
711

 
• ?
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
Program in Languages & Linguistics
?
MEMORANDUM
TO:
?
Dr. Evan Alderson
?
FROM: Jacqueline Viswanathan
Dean of Arts
?
Graduate Chair, French
Graduate Studies
SUBJECT: Graduate Proposal
?
DATE:
June 14, 1993
Library costs
I have received a copy of your memo of May 26 to Dean Clayman
regarding library costs entailed by our new course proposals. We share
your concern regarding the expenditure for monographs and serials as
assessed in Ralph Stanton's report, and would like to propose the
following:
Serials: we have reviewed our current subscriptions and
have recommended several cancellations. We shall include the two new
titles coming under the proposal
in
our replacement subscriptions. (I am
attaching a copy of the French Library representative's memo to Ralph
Stanton).
?
2. ?
Monographs: there are several ways through which we can
decrease the projected amount.
a)
The costs can be spread out over a period of three years. (See
Phyllis Wrenn's memo of May 4 and Ralph Stanton's answer)
b)
Some of these items are basic references which belong in the
undergraduate collection and should come from the French base budget.
?
• c) ?
Extra copies of books which are already in the library do not
have to be purchased. They may be placéon reserve.
?
d)
?
The single most expensive item is the edition of the complete
works by Diderot in the Slatkine edition ($1,360). This item should not
appear as part of library expenses entailed by the Graduate Proposal.
Please see Dr. Davison's attached memo regarding this matter.
.
S
I shall be happy to further discuss the matter with you, if you so
wish,
Ice-
fft -
a^k L
JV/cnj
?
Avt I
'
Jo
'J
tC
o ?
/ ?
Jacqueline Viswanathan
Enclosures z
?
. 7)
./
,j ?
'\1
'•ct (
?
/c4a1' ?
i
• ?
p, ?
.f ?
2rw ?
:
t1V/
.

 
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
Office of the l)ean, Faculty of Arts
MEMORANDUM
To: Bruce Clayman, Chair
?
From:
Evan Alderson
Senate Graduate Studies Committee
?
Dean of Arts
Subject:
Graduate Proposal: French ?
Date:
26 May 1993
This is to note that my signature on the attached course proposal
forms signifies the academic approval of the Faculty of Arts for the proposed
changes. My signature does not constitute a commitment to fund new
library costs associated with these courses from monies available to me in
__accordancew-iTh---t-he--sc-hed-u-le—proposed -by--the--Department
cf.
Wrenn/Stanton May 4, 1993). 1 will be considering these costs in relation to
other curriculum revision proposals coming before me and discussing with
the Department the appropriate distribution of these costs.
I trust that academic consideration of the program can continue. I
hope to have a clearer perspective on the possible implementation of the
new courses before the matter is considered by the Senate Committee on
Academic Planning.
-
Evan Alderson
lA/hj
?
Dean of Arts
cc:
?
I. Wrenn
R. Davison
A. Lebowitz
R. Stanton
I
I
n

 
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
Office of the Dean, Faculty of Arts ?
MEMORANDUM
T& Rosena Davison, French ?
From: Evan Alderson
/ ihyl1is
Wrenn, French ?
Dean of Arts
SUbjëët Graduate Proposal
?
Date:
26 May 1993
You will see from the attached that I think we should talk about how
the library costs entailed by the French graduate program proposal are to be
fühdêd. As
bite
specific matter I ask you to consider whether the recurring
costs for serials might better be secured by cancelling other serials now in
ubscriptibn for the French Department than by transferring base funds
froth theFaculty of Arts, or the Department of French.
Evan Alderson
' EA/FIj ?
Dean of Arts
cc: ?
A. iêbbWitz
•i. Stanton
.
L41

 
?
To: Ralph Stanton
From: Guy Poirier
Subject: Periodicals--French Dept.
Dear Ralph,
you will find hereby the lists of periodicals we wish to delete / keep / buy membership to
for both lists: Arts-lit-&cn and Arts-ling.
As you will see, we wish to be informed of the costs of the new periodicals we a-e
asking you to buy before taking a final decision and though before the library buys any
-
Finally, as Dr. Bartlett and I told you, we also wish to be aware of the decisicns made
by the Dept of linguistics concerning the Arts-ling list, and consulted before ),ou delete from
the list any periodical that will be of some interest for us.
I will be away for a research trip from June 7th until July 30th, but you can caitact
meanwhile Dr. Bartlett who kindly accepted to be in charge of the French Linguiics list, or
Dr. Viswanathan for the literature one.
Sincerely,
Guy Poirier
.
.
3D

 
French Linguistics - Journals/periodicals
The following journals relating to French linguistics received
regularly
*(to
appear in PERRM) or irregularly (to appear in STACKS).
All but 4 (marked *) appear on the ARTS-LING-0000 list; the other 4
appear on the ARTS-LITO-FREN list.
We need to retain all of them.
?
27.82 ?
*Langues et linguistiques
?
02267144
?
48.38
?
*Francais moderne
?
65.51 ?
*Langue francaise
?
79.97 ?
Le francais dans le monde 00159395
?
8.46 ?
Cahiers linguistiques dOttawa
?
03153967
?
74.89
?
Langages ?
0458726X
?
33.88
?
Lecons de linguistique de Gustave Guillaume
pub276376799
?
79.58
?
La Linguistique
Presence francophone (appears in PERRM but not on lists)
?
?
27.24
?
Quebec franca is
?
03162052
?
0.00
?
Langues et linguistique
204.07 ?
Lingvisticae investigationes ?
03784169
.
[]
61

 
0
2
We recommend deletion of the following French linguistics serial
acquisition (appearing on the ARTS-LIT-FREN list)
58.10
?
Franzosisches etymologisches Worterbuch
There are no French linguistics journals appearing in the ARTS-
LING-0000 list that we can eliminate.
We are however recommending elimination of the following journals
classed in two groups. They all appear on the ARTS-LING-000 list.
i )Journals with_lttUe a
pp
ar-ent-or--no interest-for eith gënëa[
linguists or French linguists:
.
45.05
Modern Language Journal
00267902
51.48
Modern Philology
00268232
92.71
Modern Language Notes
00767910
130.62
Modern Language Review
00267937
57.24
Neuphilologische Mitteilungen
00283754
48.07
Neuren sprachen
03423816
153.83
Neophilologus
00282677
83.64
Classical philology
0009837X
82.55
American journal of philology
00099475
72.07
Classica et Mediaevalia: revue danoise
?
01065815
77.52
Revista de filologia espanola
2) The French Department would have no complaints if the following
were cancelled but recognizes that the Linguistics Department may
wish to retain them:
.
48.82
General linguistics
?
00 166553
51.47
NALLD [Lang. Lab directors newsletter] 00275905
15.27
Texas Linguistic Forum
25.73
Journal of English Linguistics
31.12
Indian Linguistics
40.28
Australian Joiurnal of Linguistics
45.03
Journal of Chinese Linguistics
52.25
Oceanic Linguistics
100.54
Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan
149.45
Anglia
474.40
Pacific Linguistics
?
Series A - D
470.15
Proceedings of Inter. Congress of Onomastic Sciences
5:;L

 
The French Department would like to add the following journals
relating to French linguistics but would prefer to know the costs of
all items before making a preferential listing.
Cahiers de linguistique francaise
Cahiers de Lexicologie
Carrier pidgin
Espace creole
etudes creoles
Langage et Societe
Recherches sur le francais pane (Aix-en--Provence)
Revue quebecoise de linguistique
Studies in French Linguistics
Travaux de linguistique et de philologie (Nancy)
About half of these have random numbers appearing either in the
periodical stacks or in the general stacks.
We would like to assure their continued and uninterrupted supply
whether they appear regularly or on an irregular basis.
.
S
53

 
0 ?
French Literature-journals periodicals
1.
From the list ARTS-LIT-FREN, the French Literature section of
the Dept. of French decided to eliminate the following
memberships:
22.89 French 17
39.56 Bulletin de l'academie royale de Belgique
46.75 French periodical index
58.19 Franzosisches etymnologisches
68.74 Revue d'etude du roman du XXe siecle
132.95 Cahiers Saint-Simon
-We -also -wou-ld
accept todeiet 11183 Fñff YX bibliographie
F i-h
?
rnmT -y-ch-h-
i-,
4-1
?
(\4-4-
?
Vi ?
V , ? -
2.
We also think that the membership for the following titles
should be sharewith other Departments who are using it:
46.75 French periodical index
should be transferred to the library budet
101.60 International Journal of Canadian Studies
.
?
?
should be shared with Canadian Studies or the Dept. of
History.
1279.12 Studies on Voltaire and the 18th century
should be shared with the English Department and perhaps the
History Dept.
0

 
MEMORANDUM
?
L.
W.A.C. Bennett Library, Simon Fraser University
?
Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Date: 10 June, 1993
From: Ralph Stanton (Collections Librarian)
To: ?
Guy Poirier (French)
Re: ?
Serials
This memo confirms that the International Journal of
Canadian Studies has been transferred to the History account
and that the French Periodical Index has been transferred to
the Library General account.
RS
.

 
I
?
I
S
MEMORANDUM
W.A.C. Bennett. Library, Simon Fraser University
?
Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
l)it:e:
?
6 May, 1993
Irorn: Ralph Stanton (Collections Librarian)
French
lu: ?
P.W. Wrenn,
Graduate Programme Chair, Department of
Re:
?
Library Course Assessment French Graduate Curriculum
Proposal, Your memo of May 4,
1993
!liink-you for
your memorandum with a proposed three year
r)Itse---JlI
of
the one time costs. We agree with your proposal
piti
itid
Will
after
purchase
the transfer
the required
of the sums
material
indicated.
according
I am
to
assuming
your
hit you are also agreeing with the transfer from base of
176.28
in the fiscal year 1993-94 to cover the costs
i:•;:;uc iatd with two serial publications.
Noose call it you have any questions
c. Dr. Bruce .: layman, Dean of Graduate Studies
0

 
DEPARTMENT OF FRENCH
To: ?
Ralph Stanton, Collections Librarian
From: ?
P.,Wrenn, Graduate Program Chair, Department of
French
Graduate Curriculum Proposal, Library Assessment
Date:, ?
May 4, 1993
Thank you for the assessment of the Library
'
s needs. in relation
to the .
new graduate courses we have proposed for French.
I' am gratified that the recurring annual, costs are small. As far
as the more significant one time costs of $5,552 are concerned,
please note that the courses to which. these apply
willi be phased in
over a period o three years thereby considerably reducing the
funding, required to start the program.
The following represents a workable breakdown:
?
S
1st year
?
2nd year
?
3rd year
800
?
$565
80 1
?
$141
823
?
$423
?
824: $423
?
825: $1783
826: $471
830:
?
$235 ?
832: $565
?
8'31: $442
831: $500
?
831: $442 (baL)
(from $942)
$1364
?
$1959
?
$2225
B.
Ag w^^—
for P. Wrenn
I,
?
S

 
?
llJ1©1
?
llIRllTf
DEPARTMENT OF FRENCH
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ralph Stanton
?
FROM: Rosena Davison
?
Collections Librarian
?
Chair
RE: Graduate Proposal Library
?
DATE: June 14, 1993
Costs
I refer to your memo of April 15 addressed to Phyllis Wrenn concerning the
library funds for the French Graduate Programme. In particular I refer to the monographs
required for French 825-5 To
p
ics in French Literature.
I was indeed surprised to learn that Diderot's Oeuvres compltes was considered
an item to be purchased with this budget. Since I have worked extensively on Diderot
I was dismayed to discover on my appointment in 1982 that SFU did not possess a copy
of Diderot's Complete Works.
I therefore requested that this be purchased and was informed that it would be
considered. No purchase was made, because of the cost. When I received a copy of the
Slatkine Reprint Catalogue of 1991, I noticed that the Lewinter edition of Diderot's works
was available at a "bargain" price (the new edition being prepared is at least ten times that
price), and requested in 1991 that it be purchased.
I therefore have difficulty in understanding why this acquisition is now being
treated as part of the texts for French 825, rather than an essential acquisition for the
library as a whole. It presents an unreasonably high total for funding required for the
graduate courses in French.
R. Davison
RD/cs
c.c.: Evan Alderson, Dean of Arts
.
31

 
' U
?
I
c
_
I
c
?
c)
SIMON FRASER UN[VERSITY
,t1A
IA.
?
.
1V.A.C. BL-i\JNi'1"I' lIBRARY
?
MEMORANDUM
To: ?
Phyllis Wrenn, Graduate Program
?
From: Ralph Stanton
Chair, De
p
artment of French
?
Collections Librarian
Subject: Graduate Curriculum Proposal,
?
Date:
?
April 15, 1993
Library Assessment
Thank 'iou for your memorandum of March
12,
1993. Here is our
?
of the Library's
needs in relation to the following new courses:
French
800-2
French 801-2
French 323-5
French 824-5
French 825-5
French 826-5
French 830-5
French
331-5
French 322-5
Readings in French Linguistics
Basic Research methods
Interdisciplinary Approaches to French Literature
Topics in French Canadian Literature
Topics in French Literature
Monographic Studies
Canadian French
Studies of 13iliriguaiism in the French-speaking World
Theoretical Approaches to the Acquisition of French as a second Lang i::ge
.'
PRICES
Current book prices in this field are $47.10 per title.
SPECIAL.. TOPICS_COURSES
The February 8, 1
,
993 Senate motion on Library resources states under Item 3 'Special topics
courses which have not previously been offered shall be presented to the Library for an
assessment of Library materials as early as possible" For the purposes of this definition, we
think that French., 825-5, and 826-5 are special topics coUrses. Should the topics, change the
revised course outline and reading' list should be resubmitted to the Library so that we can
ensure that adequate resources are available.
-5q
S

 
I
Page
2
April 15, 1993
Phyllis Wrenn, Graduate Program Chair - French
SF AlA
LS
We note that just 16 of the 189 reading list citations are from serials (10 titles). This is an
unusuIlly low number of serials compared to other course assessments, but may be
completely normal for the topics covered. The Library holds 8 of the 10 serials titles cited.
Th Frnch Department should confirm that the Library serials collection is adequate to cover
these coi.jrses since we will not be able to add new serial titles from our funds.
PROFILE
There is no need to amend the current Library profile in Linguistics or Languages.
COURSES
French 800-2 Reading5 in French Linguistics
This compulsory two credit hour course will first be offered in 93-3 and every semester
thereafter. 11 will have an enrollment of
5-6
students.
There am 20 items in the reading list of which 3 are not in the catalogue. Of those in the
catalogue, four are on loan and should have extra copies purchased. Twelve books will cost
$505.20.
There are no periodicals required.
French 801-2 Basic Research
methods
This cnmpulsory two unit course will be offered for the first time in 93-3 and as required after
that. Estimated enrollment is 5-6.
There are five monographs and no periodicals on the reading list. Three titles are not in the
catalogue: they will cost $141 .30.
Liter
atu
re
This course will he offered once every 5-6 seniosters to 5-10 students. There are 22 items in
the reading list of which 18 are monographs and 4 from periodicals. Seven of the monograph
items are not in the catalogue and a further two are on loan and require a second copy The
cost of nine books is
$423.90.
S
4

 
Page 3
April 15, 1993
Phyllis Wrenn, Graduate Program Chair - French
One serial cited is not in the collection. It is,
Le Journal canadien de recherches semiotiques.
The cost of this journal, including tax and binding, is $73.26 and it is a recurring cost.
Fr e nch
?
E5Topics
in French Canadian LiteratUre
This course will have an estimated enrollment of 5-10 students. The date of first offering arid
frequency are not yet determined. The topics covered in this course will not change
significantly year by year.
There are
29
items in the bibliography, all are monographs. Five items are not in the
catalogue and four items are on loan, on reserve or missing. Th cost of nine titles is
$423.90.
French 825-5 Tonics
in
French Literature
This course will be offered once every 5-6 semesters to between 5 and 10 students. There
are 8 topics suggested for this COUrSe. One topic, The French Enlightenment has a 24 ireiii
readine list attached.
All items in the reading list are monographs, nine are not in the catalogue. 1 he cost of this
group is $423.90.
An additional item,
Diderot's Oeuvres completes,
Statkine edition of 1991,
is on order for this course and should be paid for by it. The cost is $1,360.00. The totOl
iS
$1,783.90.
We expect that the other seven topics noted in the course outline will generate similar costs
(minus the Diderot) to the topic French Enlightenment. We consider that this course falls into
the category Special Topics Courses as noted on page 1. Please notify the Library and send
a revised reading list when the topic changes.
French 826-5 Mon ogiaphicStudie
This course will provide an in-depth study of one writer per offering, which will be once every
5-6 semesters with 5-10 students per offering. The reading list is constructed around Adler
and
S::aridhal
and has 25 items, all but 2 aru monographs. Five of the items are not in the
catalogue and a further five are on loan arid should have a second copy ordered. The cost of
the 10 items is $471.00.
The Library is concerned that similar costs could attach themselves to other authors covered
by future versions of this course. We consider that this course falls into the category Special
Topics Courses as noted on page 1. Please notify the Library and send a revised reading list
when the topic changes.
?
0
(D

 
Page 4
April 15, 1993
Phyllis Wrenn, Graduate Program Chair - French
French 830-5Canadian French
This
course will be offered on demand and will have an enrollment of 1-2. Seventeen items
are in the bibliography, fourteen are monographs, of which three are not in the catalogue and
two are on loan and should have a second copy ordered. The cost of live titles is $235.50.
Frenc
h
?
1
-5
Studies of BilinMalis
rnm
t
hp
TThre-are291tem ifth'ë7ëdi
list. Of the 24 monographs cited, 14 are not in the catalogue and a further 6 are on loan or
missing and need added copies. Twenty books will cost $942.00.
Fre
nc
h
?
_5Theoretical Approaches to the Ac
q
uisition of Frenchas_cond
LP
gLgig
This course will he offered on demand to 1-2 students. There are 1
,
9 entries in the reading
• ?
list. Nine monographs are not in the catalogue and a further three are on loan and need
added copies. The cost of 12 monographs is $565.20. The one serial cited is not in the
collection; it is
Journal of French Language Studies
and its cost is $103.02 per year including
binding.
?
-
SUMMARY OF COSTS
Cu
Ur nQQsts.rjaIs
Le Journal canadien de recherches semiotiques
?
$
73.26
Journal of French Language Studies
Total
Recurring Costs Per Year
?
$176.28
Recurring costs per course is $19.58 per year
U
ce^a

 
Page 5
April 15,1993
Phyllis Wrenn, Graduate Program Chair - French
One time cts, Monographs
90 monographs
Slatkine Diderot
Total
One time cost per course is $6,16.87.
.
$4,191.90
$5,551.90
THE FUNDING REQUIRED FOR THESE COURSES IS $5,551.90 (ONE TIME ONLY) AND
$176.28 PER YEAR FOR
NEW'SUBSCRIPTIONS
(TRANSFER FROM BASE).
Ralph tanton
Collections Librarian
RS/eg
('3
0
-it

 
j\ppF:Nvtx i
DEPARTMENT OF FRENCH
French Graduate Irograni
In:
?
Ralph Stanton
?
Iroiii Phyllis Wrcnn
Collections Librarian
?
(iradu tt.e I > rograI1
('11,1117
Re:
?
( raduatc (.urricukiin Proposil
Date: March 12, 1993
I
-
l'utThcr to our recent telephone conversation, please find aUacl
ied your copy of.'
tfuctuiints relevant to
it
(iraduate Curriculum Proposal to he presentc(l by the Dcpatrncnt of
l'rtncli to the l'aculty of Arts Graduate Studies Committee br approvil. Since the proposal
includes nine new COUrSeS, 1 am requesting that you prepare the required report of Iibrat'
reS( n irces.
Attachments include: Summaty of Changes; and Rationales for Changes; New Course
.
?
Proposal Form, Course ( )uttinc and 131bliognmphy lbr each nev course; complete Candar
I ntrv and Program Requirements br French ( raduate Program. As discussed, I have not
included Course ( )ut hues and I ih!iographies of existing courses.
i )
'
?
-
?
ji
0

 
APPENI)IX B
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
Faculty of Education
MEMORANDUM
.
?
It'rW- -N
Ls,I:
,:*r-ICE
w
To
?
Dr. Phyllis Wrenn
?
From
?
Mike Manley-Casimi-
Department of French
?
Director of
Fax: 291-5932
?
Graduate Programs
Subject ?
New Calendar Entry
?
Date ?
April 14, 1993
This memo confirms our conversation regarding the new calendar entry
for the MA program and its possible appeal to teachers of French as a Second
Language. I have no objection to the phrasing of this entry but would ask you to
consult with Dr. Obadia upon his return.
Mike Manley-Casimir
MMC:rnw
/

 
S.93-60b
I
S
Department of History
Summary of Graduate Curriculum Revisions
SGSC Reference: ?
Mtg. of October 25, 1993
SCAP Reference: ?
SCAP 93- 38b
New course: ?
HIST 900 - 0
?
Research Project
0
0

 
?
S
Calendar Information; ?
NEW GRADUATE COURSE PROPOSAL FORM
Department: History
?
Course#: HIST 900
Title:
?
Research Project
Description: ?
A written research project normally with a minimum length of 35 pages, to be defended
before a project committee.
Credit Urs: n/a ?
Vector: n/a
?
Prerequisite(s), if any: n/a
Enrollment and Scheduling;
Estimated Enrollment: n/a
?
When will the course first be offered: 93-3
How often will the course be offered: n/a
Justification:
The research-project option has already been adopted as slated in the calendar. It simply
needs an identification number.
SResources;
Which Faculty member will usually teach the course: n/a
What are the budgetary implications of mounting the course: n/a
Are there sufficient library resources (append details): n/a
Appended: ?
a) ?
Outline of the course
?
b)
?
An indication of the competence of the Faculty member to
give the course
, :L....
Arts 92-3
0

 
S.93-6O
Department of Philosophy
Summary of Graduate Curriculum Revisions
SGSC Reference: ?
Mtg. of October 25, 1993
SCAP Reference: ?
SCAP 93- 38c
Proposal for a PhD Program in Philosophy offered jointly by Simon Fraser
University and the University of British Columbia, including
L
New courses:
PHIL 805-3
PHIL 815-3
PHIL 825-3
PHIL 845-3
PHIL 855-3
Directed Studies I
Directed Studies II
Directed Studies III
Directed Studies IV
Directed Studies V
S
(g'

 
L
• i
1:0 LAN O
L
revised February, 1993
?
8Tumcu
OFFIC
E
.
A PROPOSAL FOR A DOCTORAL PROGRAM IN
?
PHILOSOPHY FOR SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
Preamble
The following document is in six parts: The first sketches past and current anangejents__
with the U B C Dcuj
parent _of Philosophy for the-supervision-of gradnt sIiidnis, summarizes
-- the proposed arrangements, and, for the sake of comparison, mentions the cooperative
arrangements for graduate supervision in Alberta. The second provides the required general
information about the proposed program. The third is a statement (the proposed entry for the
S.F.U. calendar) of academic regulations governing admission to the MA and PhD programs,
courses offered, and requirements for the degrees. The fourth, not for inclusion in the Calendar,
is a statement of the academic procedures through which we propose to realize and regulate the
program. It stipulates the schedule by which requirements for the degrees will be met and
provides details of such matters as comprehensive examinations. The fifth is a timetable
indicating the stages by which a typical doctoral student would progress through the program.
. ?
The sixth provides the required documentation for five additional Directed Studies courses
which the S.F.U. department proposes to add to its course offerings.
Since each of the two universities speaks in its own administrative idiom, we have, in
some places, couched the document in a vocabulary which is neutral between the usages of the
two. Thus, for example, we use "course" to mean indifferently semester course at S.F.U. or one
term course at U.B.C.
0

 
.
CONTENTS
1
?
Need for the Program
?
.....................................
2
1.1
1.2 Graduate
Past
and
proposed
Programs
arrangementsin
Alberta
............
..........................
?
................
5
3
1.3 Note on Course Requirements/for the PhD Degree ...............
5
2
3 ?
General
Proposed
InformationCalendar
Entry
.........................................................................
7
6
Cooperation with U.B.0..................................
-j
Application Procedures
?
..................................
7
Application Fees
?
.......................................
7
M4
Program ?
............................................
8
Admission ..........................................
8
Degree Requirements ?
...................................
8
PhDProgram
............................................
9
Admission ..........................................
9
Degree Requirements ?
..................................
10
Graduate Coo ises .....................................
12
4 ?
Proposed Academic Procedures
..............................
14
The MA Program.....................................
14
The PhD Program ......................................
14
$A
.
doctoral student's progress
....................................
.17
S
If
A
s
t
, 0

 
n
?
I Need for the Program
The University of British Columbia has had programs leading to the MA and the PhD
degrees in Philosophy since 1963. Simon Fraser has had a graduate program leading to the MA
degree since 1970. Since the inception of the U.B.C. program that university has awarded 33
PhD degrees and 36 MA degrees in Philosophy. Up to 1991, S.F.U. had awarded 15 MA
degrees in Philosophy; 5 students have completed the requirements for the degree in 1992. The
current enrolment in the two programs is:
U.B.C.: MA 15, PhD 15
S.F.U.: MA 14 (+1 qualifying student)
Hie two departments have enjoyed increasingly close cooperation in their graduate
programs for a number of years. The S.F.U. department has typically drawn its external
examiners from the U.B.C. department. S.F.U. department members have offered joint graduate
seminars at U.B.C. and participated in the supervision of U.B.C. doctoral research, receiving
adjunct appointments at U.B.C. S.F.U. graduate students in Philosophy participate in U.B.C.
graduate seminars, as do U.B.C. graduate students in those at S.F.U. There is increasing contact
hetween the graduate students of the two departments both informally and at jointly sponsored
conferences and meetings.
The benefits of this cooperation, for graduate and undergraduate students and for
department members, have always been found worthwhile and sometimes lustrous, but the
methods have, of necessity, been cumbersome and
ad hoc.
A planned, joint program with
regularised and codified procedures, and published opportunities and requirements will bring
these benefits more smoothly and reliably to more students, and more students to the two
universities.
There is increasing contact between philosophers and researchers in other disciplines,
particularly computing science, and there may well be nearly as many graduates of Philosophy
programs working, for example, in computing related industry in British Columbia as there are
teaching Philosophy in the universities and colleges. Many of these have doctoral degrees in
Philosophy. But
110
such trend would justify the multiplication of doctoral programs in
Philosophy. It is not anticipated that enrollment in the joint program will exceed 45. Of these,
• ?
some will take degrees who will never receive academic appointments in Philosophy or apply
any precisely definable part of their training to any commercial purpose. The justification for the
'1k'
-

 
merger is, on the one hand, that it will make an existing, indeed long established program better,
and on the other, that it will bring the Simon Fraser department into fuller participation in the
only Philosophy doctoral program in the province. It is a necessary condition for a proper
partnership in the doctoral program that Simon Fraser University be Prepared to admit the
program to its calendar and to confer some of the degrees.
In September, 1993 the S.F.U. department will have 14 members, the U.B.C. department
12. Combined, our numbers and breadth of specialties will be roughly comparable to the
combined graduate programs in Philosophy at the University of Alberta and the University of
Calgary.
if
1 Past and Proposed arrangements
Our working arrangement has been that a philosophy student at one university wishing to
take a graduate course at the other registers in a course at his own university bearing a calendar
description comparable to that of the course to be taken. S.F.U. faculty teaching U.B.C. courses
have been given adjunct V.B.C. appointments for the academic year of the course, as are S.F.U.
facifity. serving on supervisory committees of MA and PhD students at U.R.C. With the
Introduction of the joint program, these
ad hoc
arrangements will give way to others by which
transcripts will record courses as those of the sibling institution, and administrative complexities
of registration in sibling department courses will be made as transparent as possible to our
students.
The principal immediate proposal is that the arrangements between the S.F.U. department
and the U.B.C. department be made symmetric by the introduction of a doctoral program in
Philosophy at S.F.U. which would bear to tile U.B.C. department roughly the relationship that
theirs now bears to ours. That is to say, the S.F.U. doctoral program would draw
UOfl
the
resources of the U.B.C. department approximately as theirs now draws upon ours, and students
being principally supervised at S.F.U. would be registered at S.F.U., probably, but not
necessarily, receive most of their instruction at S.F.U. and receive S.F.U. degrees. In addition,
the two programs would cooperate in the promotion of the program, would not compete for
admissions, and would coordinate course offerings. Within these arrangements, the MA
programs would continue to operate more or less autonomously and with slightly different
requirements as in the past. In the case of the Pill) program, we have made an attempt to codify
Common regulations, and the U.B.C. department has now adopted the regulations which our
discussions have produced. Nevertheless, there may well be global changes at U.B.C. or at
S.F.U. which would disrupt any attempt at permanent uniformity. We have concluded that, at
3
?
IJ

 
• least initially, we will minimise administrative stress while maximising opportunities for
genuinely academic interaction by instituting two programs with parallel rather than identical
requirements, and by coordinating operations and all future changes in operating procedures and
requirements. In time, with continuing goodwill and experience, we will find the academically
Optimal level of integration.
A few administrative details of these arrangements are still being worked out, and this
proposal
aSSUmeS
a happy issue out of these negotiations. In particular, we propose symmetrical
policies on course credit, course transfer, and
transfer of registration,
as follow:
1.
It is proposed that enrollment in courses at the sibling university be handled within the
- - -
general provisions Of _the _Western—DL ins'—tgieemcnt-
Lxce
l) t
thi[ th authority for
- - approving such registrations be delegated to the Graduate Chairs of the departments. It is
proposed that the deadlines for such registrations be the same as for the students at the
university offering the courses.
2.
As regards the S.F.U. program, it is proposed by
our
Dean of Graduate Studies that
U.B.C. (500 level) graduate courses other than thesis courses be listed in the S.F.U.
. Calendar at the 700 level. This will being two benefits: First it will facilitate accurate
records of courses taken. Secondly it will permit full
transfer
credit for students moving
from the U.B.C. program to the S.F.U. program at any point in their doctoral program.
Thus
students for whom changes in the direction of their research necessitate a change of
supervisor will be
able to register
ad cundem gradum
at the
sibling university
if that is
where the work should be supervised. U.B.C. numerical scores will be translated
according to a formula already in use within the
office of
the Dean of Graduate Studies at
S.F.U.
We anticipate that the interchange of
students
will be roughly
equal.
Thus, neither
department could be seen as unfairly subsidising a graduate program in the other. There will in
any case be only a
modest
increase in the number of students, so that no great additional
demands upon library or department resources need be expected.
We anticipate only a modest increase in the number of graduate students as a result of the
new
program. Since we
are
heavily dependent upon teaching assistantships for graduate support,
any doctoral admissions without external funds such as SSI IRCC fellowships must affect
?
?
admissions at the MA level. It seems that there will be no shortage of candidates for admission
?
to the doctoral program. Several very strong candidates present themselves from among our
1^
4

 
recent MA graduates, and, without any advertisement, we had 13 inquiries
ill)OUt doctoral
studies
for 92-3 in addition to the 105 MA enquiries. (Of the 105,
about
30 applied;
about
12 were
clearly admissible; we were able to admit 6.)
1.2 Graduate Programs in Alberta
By way of comparison, the graduate program in the department of Philosophy at the
University of Alberta had as of 1990: 17 faculty, 11 PhD students and 7 MA students. At the
University of Calgary the program had: 18
faculty,
13 PhD students and 8 MA students. An
agreement between the two universities provides for faculty at either university to supervise or
serve on graduate committees for students a the other university. In
addition,
funds are being
made available for students registered at one university, but supervised from the other to spend at
least a year at the supervisor's university.
1.3 Note on Course Requirements for the Phi) Degree
The requirement of 12 graduate courses (36 semester hours) for the
PhD
degree (8 (24
semester hours) after the MA) exceeds the
number
of required courses for the PhD degree in
other departments at the university, but is not
unusual among
Philosophy doctoral programs in
Canada and the U.S. Some other Canadian departments' requirements are furnished below as
examples:
University of Alberta
?
6 after the MA. Up to 12 after the BA
University of B.C.
?
10-12 courses (usually 12)
University of Calgary
?
at least 6 after the MA. 12 after the
BA
Dalhousie University ?
varied
McGill University ?
two years of
COUSC
work
Queen's University ?
4 courses & 4 comprehensive essays
University of Toronto
?
12 courses, 8 after the MA plus one course outside the department
Western Ontario
?
12 courses
York University ?
10 courses
J^
.
5

 
1
0 ?
2 General Information
I. ?
Title of the program:
S.F.U. Doctoral Program in Philosophy
2.
Credentials to be made available by it:
Doctor of Philosophy (S.F.U.)
3.
Departments to offer the program
The Department of Philosophy (S.F.U.)
with the cooperation of
The Department of Philosophy (U.B.C.)
4.
Schedule of Implementation
First admissions: September 1993
First graduations: 1998 or 1999
.
6

 
(revised 1 October, 1992)
?
I
3 Proposed Calendar Entry
Cooperation with U.B.C.
The Philosophy Departments of S.F.U. and U.B.C. cooperate in the administration of
their graduate programs. A student enrolled in a graduate program at S.F.U. is supervised by a
member of the S.F.U. department, but may count graduate courses at U.B.C. toward degree
requirements and have members of the U.B.C. department as other members of a supervisory
committee. Since Simon Fraser University operates on a trimester system, and the University of
British Columbia on a sessional system, the language adopted for descriptions of Course
requirements is intended to be neutral as between the two systems.
Titus, in what follows,
"course" means "semester course" or "one term course".
Application Procedures
The Philosophy Departments of S.F.U. and U.B.C. cooperate in the administration of
applications to their graduate programs. Prospective applicants are sent application forms for
both universities and may submit applications to one or both departments. Applicants who apply
to both universities may indicate a preference to enroll at one of them. Applicants who wish to
be considered by both departments are asked to submit applications and supporting documents to
each department.
Application fees
An application fee of $40.00 is charged.
.
7

 
MA PrOgram
Admission
In addition to meeting the minimum university admission requirements (see
the Graduate
General Regulations), an applicant for a Master's degree normally must hold, from a recognized
university, an
1-lonours
Bachelor's degree with a
cumulative
grade
point average
(CGPA) of 3.33
or a General Bachelor's degree with a grade point average of 3.5 in third and fourth year
Philosophy courses, and must submit references from qualified referees.
A student whose undergraduate work does not satisfy the above conditions may be
- ---
Teqwrechoc(m1.plete additional undergraduate courses as a part of a graduate program, or to
register as a Qualifying Student before consideration for admission to the MA program.
Degree Requirements
A candidate for the MA in Philosophy must:
I.
?
complete four courses at the graduate level, gaining at least a second class standing
(CGPA of 3.00) and
2.
submit and successfully defend a thesis giving evidence of independent critical ability.
3.
show competence in such foreign languages as the Graduate Studies Committee
determines to be required for the proposed research.
J'^
.
8

 
PhD Program
Admission
Applications for the PhD degree must have completed:
1.
a Bachelor's degree with First Class 1-lonours (and
it
CGPA of 3.67 or equivalent in
Philosophy courses), or
2.
a Master's degree (or equivalent), or
3.
a Bachelor's degree with one year of study in
it
Master's program, four graduate courses
with a CGPA of 3.67 and clear evidence of research ability. (Transfer directly into a
Doctoral program is not normally permitted beyond the first year of study and will not be
permitted after the completion of the second year in a Master's program.)
0
Rk
Loll

 
Degree Requirements
I. ?
Courses:
a.
Students
in the
PhD
program are normally
required to complete twelve
graduate
courses, six
in the
first year of registration in the program, and
six in
the second. Students admitted
after
one year in the MA program are
normally
required to complete
at
least eight
graduate
courses beyond those
completed
in
the MA program.
b.
Students entering the PhD program after completing the requirements
for
mi -
M!c ddir 1ha
t
course requirements
reduced, but in no case
by more
than
four courses. Each student's
committee
will recommend,
according
to the student's background and
the
requirements appropriate to
the field of research,
the
kind and number of courses to be taken by the
student.
C.
?
Students entering directly from
the
Bachelor's degree must, during the first
year of graduate study, complete six courses
with
a CGPA of at least 3.33.
2.
Examinations:
Students
in the Phi)
program are required to pass a Comprehensive Examination,
normally by the end of the first semester of the third year of registration in
the program.
Upon successful completion of the Comprehensive
Examination and
an approved thesis
proposal,
a
student is admitted to candidacy for the PhD degree.
3.
Language Requirements:
Students in the PhD
program are required to demonstrate
such
competence in foreign
languages
as the
Graduate Studies Committee deems essential to the successful
completion of their proposed research.
4.
Formal Logic Requirement:
Students in the PhD program are required to either
have or
acquire competence in formal
logic,
at a minimum at the
level of Phil 210, higher
when
relevant to their research.
r
L
10
?
J^

 
Thesis Proposal and Seminar:
Before the end of the first semester of the third year in the program, a candidate for the
PhD degree is required to submit a thesis proposal for approval of an examining
committee consisting of the student's Supervisory Committee and one further member of
the combined graduate department. The proposal must give evidence that the student is
acquainted with the literature in the area of the proposed research and must represent a
well defined program of investigation.
5 ni'
Before the end of the second ftrmaof the third year of the program, the candidate is
required to make a presentation to a colloquium of faculty and graduate students of the
combined department on the subject of the proposed research.
6. ?
Thesis:
Students in the PhD program are required to write and cicIen(1 a thesis embodying
original philosophical research.
I
.
I

 
SGraduate Courses
Courses in the 700 range are offered at U.B.C. The U.B.C. number is given in parentheses.
S.F.U. students enrolling in these courses register in the course at S.F.U. tinder the 700 number
and enroll in the course at U.B.C. under the U.B.C. number. Registration must be approved by
the Department Graduate Studies Committee.
1
1
1111, 710-3 (510 (3-12)(1)
Ancient Philosophy
PI 111, 712-3 (512 (3-12)d)
Medieval Philosophy
III 111, 714-3 (514 (3-12)(1)
Early Modern Philosophy
- --- ----PI
111-1-7-16-3--(51-6 (3;12)d
MödPtiilob
P1111. 718-3 (518 (3-12)(1)
Twentieth Century Philosophy
I
I
I II L 720-3 (520 (3-12)(1)
Logic
P1111 ?
725-3 (525 (3-12)(1)
Philosophy of Language
P1111.727-3(527 (3-12)(1)
Philosophy of Mathematics
III I IL 728-3 (527 (3-12)d)
FOun(lat ions of Mathematics
1)
III1,
730-3 (539 (3-12)(1)
1
1
1111, 731-3
Moral Philosophy
(531 (3-12)(1)
Political Philosophy
MIlL 732-3 (532 (3-12)(1)
Ethical Theory and Practice
P1111. 733-3 (533 (3-12)(1)
Issues in Biomedical Ethics
P1111. 734-3 (534 (3-12)(1)
Issues in Business & Professional Ethics
PHIL 735-3 (535 (3-12)(1)
Issues
in
Environmental
Ethics
PhIL 736-3 (536 (3-12)(1)
Ethical Issues in Social Policy
I'IIIL 739-3 (539 (3-12)(1)
Aesthetics
PhIL 740-3 (549 (3-12)(1)
Epistemology
I
I
I IL 750-3 (550 (3-12)(1)
Metaphysics
III 111, 751-3
(551 (3-12)(1)
Philosophy of Mind
l'lllL 760-3 (560 (3-12)(1)
Philosophy of Science
PII1L 781-789-3 (581-589 (3-12)d) Problems
Courses in the 80() range are offered at S.P.U.
PhIL 800-3 ?
Pllhl 801-3 ?
S1
1
1111, 805-3 ?
I'IIIL 810-3
Graduate Seminar in Epistemology I
Graduate Seminar in Epistemology II
Directed Studies I
Graduate Seminar in Ethics I
j
%k

 
0
PHIL 811-3
Graduate Seminar in Ethics It
PHIL 815-3
Directed Studies H
PHIL 820-3
Graduate Seminar in Philosophy of Mind I
PHIL 821-3
Graduate Seminar in Philosophy of Mind II
PHIL 825-3
Directed Studies III
PHIL 830-3
Graduate Seminar in Aesthetics
PHIL 840-3
Graduate Seminar in LQgic
PHIL 845-3
Directed Studies IV
PHIL 850-3
Graduate Seminar in Philosophy of Language
PHIL 855-3
Directed Studies V
PHIL 860-3
Graduate Seminar in Philosophy of Science
PHIL 870-3
Graduate Seminar in Philosophical Texts I
PHIL 871-3
Graduate Seminar in Philosophical Texts Ii
PHIL 880-3
Graduate Seminar in Social Philosophy
PHIL 898
MA Thesis
PHIL 998
PhD Thesis
.
El

 
4 Proposed Academic Procedures
(Department Document)
The MA Program
Upon admission, every student is assigned a member of the department as Interim Tutor.
A supervisory committee is appointed before the end of the student's second semester.
Both the original composition of and any subsequent changes to thet Supervisory
Committee are subject to the approval of the Graduate Studies Committee and the Dean
of Graduate Studies.
2. No later than the submission of the first draft of the thesis, the Department, on the
recommendation of the Graduate Studies Committee, nominates an examiner for the
thesis. The examiner must hold a university appointment outside of the Simon Fraser
Department of Philosophy and where possible, will be a member of some other
Philosophy Department.
. 3. The progress of each student working for the MA degree is reviewed from time to time
and at least once a year after a student's second semester in the program. A student may
be required to withdraw for unsatisfactory course work, for deficient examination results,
or for inadequate application or progress in thesis research. Procedures are given in
Section 1.8.2 of the Graduate Calendar (Procedure for Review of Unsatisfactory
Progress). ?
-
The Phi) Program
Upon a student's admission to the program, an InliSrim Tutor is appointed. Upon
registration, the Interim Tutor, in consultation with the student proposes to the Graduate
Studies Committee a program of studies.
2. A Supervisory Committee consisting of a Senior Supervisor as its chair and at least two
other members is appointed before the end of the student's second semester in the
program. The Supervisory Committee will normally have members of both universities
and may include faculty members from other departments. Both the original composition
of and any subsequent changes to the Supervisory Committee are subject to the approval
of the Graduate Studies Committee and the Dean of Graduate Studies.
14
?
j5

 
3.
The Senior Supervisor is expected to take an active part in the direction of the doctoral
student's research activities, and Lhe student is expected to take an active part in the active
life of the department. Engagement in collaborative research, attendance at colloquia,
presentation of work in progress, and participation in discussion are all considered
important aspects of that academic life.
4.
The Supervisory Committee, upon its formation, determines in consultation with the
student, what specific credentials must be demonstrated before thesis research in the
proposed area may begin, and by what form of examination they are to be demonstrated.
The Supervisory Committee will submit the requirements in writing for the approval of
the Graduate Studies Committee. No subsequent changes in the requirements may be
made without the approval of the Graduate Studies Committee. In particular:
a.
The Graduate Studies Committee may set examinations to test a candidate's
ability to read any language needed for the program of
work.
b.
Candidates must either have or acquire competence in formal logic.
C. ?
Candidates must acquire familiarity with such classic works in the history of
philosophy as are appropriate to their overall programs, but including in any case
?
40
?
a familiarity with the main works of one major philosopher or school of
philosophers.
d.
?
The student must demonstrate by comprehensive examination, that an acceptable
standard has been met.
The Supervisory Committee bears primary responsibility for the supervision of thesis
research. When the thesis is completed to the satisfaction of the Supervisory Committee,
the Graduate Studies Committee in consultation with the Supervisory Committee,
recommends two examiners, an eter-nl examiner who is a member of the faculty of
S.F.U. outside the Department of Philosophy and not a member of the supervisory
committee, and an external examiner who is not a member of S.F.U. or U.B.C. and not a
member of the supervisory committee.
6. ?
Changes in a particular student's program of study may be made from time to time by the
Graduate Studies Committee in consultation with the Supervisory Committee and the
student.
?
:0
$1^
15

 
$ ?
I
.
7. The progress of each student working for the PhD degree is reviewed from time to time
and at least once a year after a student's second semester iii the program. A student may
he required to withdraw for unsatisfactory course work, for deficient examination results,
or for inadequate progress or application in research. Procesures are given in Section
1.8.2 of the Graduate Calendar (Procedure for Review of Unsatisfactory Progress).
[]
F-I
S6
16

 
LIBRARY RESOURCES
?
I ?
IHLe
U.B.CL - S.F.U. JOINT GRADUATE PROGRAMME IN PHILOSOPHY
T
h
e
Simon Fraser University Library is now more than twenty-five years old and the
collection is no longer insignificant. Holdings include aDDroxi mate Iv:
980,000 monographs
179,000 bound journal volumes
840.000 microforms
1,999,000
The Library subscribes to some 11,000 serials, 'including about 5,200 journals. The
philosophy collection consists of 25,000 - 30,000 books, as well as subscriptions to 110
,,journals, with major backfiles held in most cases. The Departmental Library Representative
has worked diligently with Librarians for a number of -.years and, as a consequence, effective
approval profiles are in place, the serials subscriptions have been carefully monitored and
discretionary purchases are well-planned. This year we will spend approximately $40,000 for
philosophy and will add about 425 books and 200 bound journal volumes to the collection.
These figures are not, perhaps overly impressive when compared to the UBC collection
of about eight million items, but other comparisons might be more useful.
The Library has recently acquired the capacity to compare its monograph holdings for a
ten year period (1978/79 - 1987/88) with those of the 927 (largely U.S.) academic and research
libraries whose holdings are represented in the OCLC On-line Database. This database
includes more than 1.6 million titles which were published during that period and which are held
'
by at. least one of the 927 libraries. In the following charts the SFU philosophy collection is
compared to three groups within the OCLC database:
a)
The entire Database
-
,all 927 libraries.
b)
ARL (Association of Research Libraries) members in the database.
.
This group includes 71 of th
academic libraries in the United
California at Berkeley, Harvard,
Texas, Wisconsin, and Indiana.
largest and most prestigious
States such as the University of
and the Universities of Illinois,
c) Large Academic Libraries.
This group includes 72 institutions with monograph holdings in
excess of 700,000 volumes but excludes the ARL libraries grouped
in Category b) above. It includes such institutions as Bowling
Green, Baylor, Brandeis, Oberlin, andthe Universities of Ohio, New
Hampshire, and California at Santa Cruz. In terms of overall
holdings SFU should rank close to the center of this group.
.

 
(page 2)
?
-
CHART
A
L ?
COLLECTION COUNTS*
CLASS#
DESCRIPTION
SFU
THE ENTIRE
DATABASE
ARL
LIBRARIES
LARGE ACADEMIC
LIBRARIES
81 -B68
Philosophy
95
1,195
1,115
517
B69 - B789
Ancient, Renaissance
342
4,186
3,948
1,967
B790 - B5739
Post-renaissance
947
8,544
8,196
4,420
BC - BC9999
Logic
125
885
813
532
BD1 - BD9999
Speculative
?
_-
306- - - ?
-2615- -
-2,435
1,815
17,425
16,507
8,789
* This chart compares titles held by SFU to the
combined collections of each group
L
CHART B ?
COLLECTION COUNTS*
CLASS #
DESCRIPTION
SFU
THE ENTIRE
DATABASE
ARL
LIBRARIES
LARGE ACADEMIC
LIBRARIES
Bi - B68
Philosophy
95
42
176
84
B69 - B789
Ancient, Renaissance
342
152
713
318
B790 - B5739
Post-renaissance
947
387
1,738
808
BC1 - BC9999
Logic
125
40
180
95
BD1 - BD9999
Speculative
306
120
476
261
1,815
741
3,283
1,566
* SFU is compared to
avera g
e
holdings of
the members of each group.
40
%I

 
(page 3)
Chart A clearly illustrates the richness and scope of the aggregate collections in
each peer group and SFU appears sadly deficient. However, when compared with the average
holding of each peer group (Chart B) the picture is quite different. In terms of average size SFU
compares very favorably to the entire database and exceeds the average holdings of our
closest peer group (the large academic libraries) by 15.9%.
However, numbers tell only part of the story and must be supplemented by a
knowledgeable qualitative assessment of the collection: As part of a preliminary discussion Of
this programthe Philosophy Department examined the SFU collection and stated:
"The philosophy holdings are quite varied and contain the complete
writings of virtually all the major figures in the history of philosophy
in the original languages as well as the complete works of a
considerable number of secondary figures. The holdings are
particularly strong in 17th - 20th century British philosophy in all
branches. Continental and Medieval philosophy and aesthetics are
much less well represented."
The final version of the proposal includes five new Directed Studies courses, with
five sample course outlines and bibliographies. The Library owns virtually all of the titles cited
in the five examples and I have been told that these materials are also owned by the
Department itself.
In summary, the Philosophy collection appears to stand up well, both in quantity
and quality against all but the largest research libraries, although some weaknesses are noted.
However, since this Graduate Programme is to be offered jointly with UBC in North America, it
would appear not to suffer any serious lack of Library support. However, if $5,000 were added
to the base budget it would be possible to upgrade those areas of the collection in which we are
weakest. This would enable us to provide a balanced on-campus collection to supplement the
greater resources held by UBC.
r,^t^
philos.st
Jan. 11/93
.
fl
p

 
SIMON FRASER UNWERSITY
NEW GRADUATE COURSE PROPOSAL
.
CALENDAR ThFORMATION:
Department:
Philosophy
?
Course Number:__
305
Tide: _Directed Studies
I
Description:
Credit Hours:
?
3
?
Vector:
?
Prerequisite(s) if any:
ENROLLMENT AND SCHEDULING:
EstimatcdEnrollment:
?
__When will -the
-course-first-be- of-fcrcd:--9-2-1--0r -92
?
- -
How often will the course be offered: Asrequired
JUSTIFICATION:
This increases the number of courses available for graduate instruction in a small
graduate programme
in which courses must be designed individually for a diversity
of students.
RESOURCES:
Which Faculty member will normally teach the course: _
Any dept. member
None
What are the
budgetary
implications of mounting the course:_______________________________________
Are there sufficient Library resources (append dctails):
Yes
Appended: a) Outline of the Course
b)
An indication of the competence of the
?
ber
to give
the course.
c)
Library resources
Approved: Departmental Graduate Studies
?
Date: Apr
4,1991
Faculty Grade Studies Commiuçc
?
Date:'
Faculty:
?
_
?
Date: ?
_7L
Senate Graduate Studies Committee:— ?
Date: 3
,_
Senate: ?
Date:_____________
f^q
.

 
(a)
Outline
The
of the
attached
Coursedescription
?
is merely a sample of a course which might be
0
given using this number.
(b)
The course will be offered in areas in which department members are
competent to give courses at a graduate level.
(c)
The course will normally have only one or two students. The department's
own resources in books and journals will be sufficient.
r
L
S

 
PHIL 805-3: DIRECTED STUDIES
Knowledge cannotjq
j
pjv be justified true belief, many have argued. It is not enough that
• tile belief be cruc and hcld for good reasons; it must also be appropriately related to the
conditions, typically external, that make it true. Othcrwise it could still be merely a lucky
coincidence, in spite of one's cpistcmic conscientiousness, that one manages to know something,
as many examples seem to show.
There is by now a plethora of proposals as to what this further appropriate relation to
typically external conditions must be, including 'causal' theories, 'reliability' theories,
'informational' theories, and 'counterfactual' theories of knowledge. None of these proposals
necessarily impugns the idea that
j
ustification is at least nccessjiry for knowledge. But some
recent versions of such 'excrnalist' accounts of knowledge have put a further, cxtcrnalist, spin
on the notion of justification as well. They suggest that no matter what the subjective, internal,
psychological conditions of tile believer, e.g., no matter what her reasons for her belief, it counts
as 'justified' provided, e.g., that it results from a cognitive process that is
j
fact reliable
(enough); i.e., that in fact tends to produce true beliefs. This appears to write out of the picture
as irrelcvent to justification and therefore to knowledge as opposed to mere belief any internal
subjective constraints. On the face of it this seems quite implausible.
?
- -- - -
?
- -
Two recent proponents of such radical forms of externalism are Robert Nozick and Alvin
Goldman; Nozick in his countcrfactual theory in Philpsphical planajjQfl., and Goldman most
recently in his reliability theory in
Eth tcr
jcJc
g
y aj
j
l Cgjjji.
In this course we shall subject
these theories to close critical scrutiny. In doing so. we shall be especially concerned with the
prior issue of what the point is of having notions like knowledge and justification. What are
these notions f, in our intellectual economy? What is their practical function? And do these
radically cxtcrnalist accounts succeed in capturing it?
• ?
Slectcd 3ibliogrpiy
Armstrong, DAM.. Belief, Truth andKnowlcdg, Cambridge University Press (London, 1973).
Boniour, Laurence.h Structure
.f
mpirical
Knpwl
cçgç, 1-larvard University Pres
(Cambridge, MA, 1985).
Goldman, Alvin. F-pi.stctno lo gy an
d
?
Harvard University Press (Cambridge, MA,
1986).
Kripke, Saul. "Counterfactual Theories of Knowledge", (unpublished taped lec(ures)
Nozick, Robert. Philosophical
Ex _
lanations, Harvard University Press/Bclnap (Cambridge, MA,
1981).
Pappas, George S. (ed.) JtistifIcu ion
aiiii
Kno
w
lcdgc D. Reidel Pub. Co. (Dordrecht, 1979).
Shope, Robert. The
?
f
Knowing. A Decade
Qf
Research Princeton University Press
?
(Princeton, 1983).
Shienar, Doininik. "Goldman's Reliability Theory of Knowledge." (unpublished manuscript).

 
SIMON
FRASER UMVERSITY
NEW GRADUATE COURSE PROPOSAL
ALENDAR INFORMATION:
Department*
Philosophy
?
Coursc Numbcr:_815
idc: ?
Directed Studies LI
Description:
1.
Hours: _Vector:
?
Prerequisite(s) if any:
ENROLLMENT
AND
SCHEDULING:
Estimated Enrollment: _
1
When will the course first be offered:
92-1 or 92-3
How often will the course be offered:
As required
JUSTIFICATION:
This increases the number of courses available for graduate instruction in a small
graduate programme in which courses must be designed individually for a diversity
students.
0
.
RESOURCES:
Which Faculty member will normally teach the course:
Any dept. member
What are the budgetary implications of mounting the coursc:
_Non(!
Arc there sufficient Library resources (append details):
Yes
Appended: a) Outline of the Course
b)
An indication of the competence of the Facult'
c)
Library resources ?
-
Approved: Departmental Graduate Studies Committ _____
?
Faculty Gradtc Studies Commi cc:
Faculty:
YC
Senate Graduate Studies Committee:
bcr to give the course.
a t e:
Apr 4. 1991
ate:2
?
0 .
/1
ate-
ate:
'0(4'>
Senate: ?
Datc:
c;L

 
(a)
Outline of the Course
The anached description is merely a sample of a course which might be
given using this number.
(b)
The course will be offcrcd in areas in which department members arc
competent to give courscs at a graduate level.
(c)
The course will normally have only one or two students. The department's
own resources in books and journals will be sufficient.
I
q3

 
SUGGESTED OUTLINE FOR PHILOSOPHY 815
Directed Studies in Social and Political Philosophy
Prepared by Ishtiyaque 1-laji
REQUIRED TEXTS:
-
Hobbesian Moral
and
Political Theory,
Gregory Kavka
-
Morals by Agreement,
David
Gauthier
-
Hobbes and the
Social Contract Tradition,
Jean
Hampton
-
Leviathan,
Thomas Hobbes
Paradoxes of Rationality and Cooperation,
R. Campbell and L. Sowden (eds.)
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
It is not unreasonable to
suppose
with Hobbes that each one of us is a predominant egoist:
given a choice between
two
altcrnativcs,each prefers the one that is better for himself or for
those he cares about. The value of cooperation is starkly evident in a resource-scarce world
replete with predominant egoists. For example, given our overfished seas, it is better for each
angler if he cooperates with the others to restrict the catch, than if no angler cooperates. Given
the monumental expenses and the insecurity of continued competition, it is better for each
superpower if each such power curbed is output of weapons than if neither did. Given our
polluted skies, it is better for each if each drives less than if no one does. But these very sorts of
situations seem to be ones in which cooperation lies beyond the reach of
rational
predominant
egoists. For instance, each superpower prefers mutually disarming to mutually arming, but each
does best if it arms unilaterally. These situations can be represented by the classic game-
theoretic matrix of the Prisoner's Dilemma (PD). The focal question of this course is this: Is
rational cooperation in a PD possible? Alternatively, is it possible for rational agents to escape a
PD?
It's worth beginning with an examination of what Hobbes had to say on this question. On
one reading of the Hobbcsian texts, persons in the state of nature are in a multi-party I'D, and
Hobbes is supposed to provide instruction on how these persons are mean to escape their
predicament.
\Ve
will then consider more recent "solutions", for example, the one offered by
David Gauthier.
COURSE REQUIREMENTS:
Three typewritten double-spaced papers 10-12 pages in length, and an annotated
bibliography.
0
^4

 
1MULN 1KALk U1'ilVlKfIY
NEW GRADUATE COURSE PROPOSAL
CALENDAR INFORMATION:
Department:
Philosophy
Title:
?
Directed Studies [IL
Dcscription:
Credit Hours:
?
3
Vector:
82 5
Course
Number:____________
Prerequisite(s) if any:
ENROLLMENT AND SCHEDULING:
Estimated
How often
Enrollment:
will the course
?
be
l
?
offered:
When
As required
will the course first
be
offered: 92-1
or
92-)
--
JUSTIFICATION:
This increases the number of courses available for graduate instruction in a small
graduate programme in which courses must be designed individually for a diversity
of students.
RESOURCES:
Which Faculty member will nonnally teach the course:
_Any dept. member
What arc the budgetary implications of mounting the course:
None
S
Arc there sufficient Library resources (append details):
Yes
Appended: a) Outline of the Course
b)
An indication of the competence of
the
Faculty
c)
Library resources
Approved: Departmental Graduate Studies Comrnittcc:
Faculty ?
.. ?
_
Faculty:
Senate
ber to give
the course.
ate:
Apr4,L991
te:
tc:
Senate: ?
Date:______________

 
* ?
I
(a)
Outline of the Course
The attached description is merely a sample of a course which might be
given using this number.
(b)
The course will be offered in areas in which department members arc
cothpctcut to give courses at a graduate level.
(c)
The course will normally have only one or two students. The dcpartmcns
own resources in books and journals will
be
sufficient.
.
LI

 
SUGGESTED
OUTLINE
FOR PHILOSOPHY 825
Directed
Studies in
Philosophy of Mind
Prepared by Martin Hahn
REQUIRED TEXT:
A set of readings purchased from the department
COURSE DESCRIPTION
Topic for the course: Individualism and Cognition.
___lntcmalism-or—individualism —
isihe vicvtli[ mental states are non-relational properties of
individuals which can be specified or individuated without reference to anything outside the
individual whose states they are. The view is intuitively plausible, but hard to state without
circularity. Part of our task will be a clear statement of the view.
Individualism has recentl
y
been defended by Jerry Fodor, John Searle, and others. Tyler Burge
has launched a series of attacks on the thesis, beginning in 1979. The debate has been lively and
centrally important to philosophy of mind, of language, and of psychology. The main goal of
?
this course is to acquaint the students with the details of the debate and, one hopes, enable them
to participate in it.
COURSE REQUIREMENTS
Students arc expected to come prepared to participate in the discussion each week. The grade
will be based 20% on class participation, 80% on a
15-20
page terril paper.
LIBRARY RESOURCES:
The required readings as well as research materials for term papers are mostly in major journals
the library subscribes to or books it already has in its collection. All the resources are also
available in the department.
.'
0^'^

 
Approved: Departmental G raduatc Studies Committee:
Ce:
A
p
r ?
1991
?
te: )_/
i ;
,
/
J
I
cc:ZC
?
j1 C'), 1-19) ?
.
Faculty Gradj
?
Studies Comrni
Faculty: ?
-
Senate Graduate Studies Committcc'
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
NEW GRADUATE COURSE PROPOSAL
CALENDAR INFORMATION:
Department:
Philosophy ?
Course Numbcr:_
Tide:
?
Directed Studies IV
Dcscription;________________________________________________________________
Credit Hours:
?
3 ?
Vcctoç: ?
Prcrcquisitc(s) if any:
ENROLLMENT AND SCHEDULING:
Estimated Enrollment:_\Vhcn will the course first be offered:
92-ior92-
How often will the course be offered:
As required
JUSTIFICATION:
This increases the number of courses available for graduate instruction in a small
graduate programme in which courses must be designed individually for a diversiLy
of students.
RESOURCES:
Which Faculty member will normally teach the course:
Any dept.member
What are the budgetary implications of moupting the course:
None
Arc there sufficient Library rcsourccs (append details):
Appended: a) Outline of the Course
b) An indication of the competence of the Facul
?
to give the course.
c) Library resources
Senate:
?
Date:_____________
E,

 
?
• (a) ?
Outline of the Course
The attached description is merely a sample of a course which might be
given using this number.
(b)
The course will be offered in areas in which department members are
competent to give courses at a graduate level.
(c)
The course will normally have only one or two students. The department's
own resources in books and journals will be sufficient.

 
SUGGESTED OUTLINE FOR PHILOSOPHY 845
?
Directed Studies in Logic
Prepared by R.E. Jennings
Topic: Managing Inconsistency.
Readings:
Books:
G. Priest, R. Roudey, J. Norman eds.
Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the
iflCOflSiStCn(.
München: Philosophia Verlag, 1989.
A.R. Anderson and N. D. Belnap Jr.
Entailment, Vol.
1. Princeton, 1975.
N. Rescher and R. Brandorn.
The Logic
of Inconsistency.
Oxford: Blacicwell's, 1980.
Articles:
N.D. Belnap Jr. "How a computer should think",
Contemporary Aspects
of Philosophy.
Proceedings
of
the Otford International Symposiwn,
Boston: Oriel Press, 36-5 1.
D. Lewis. 'Logic for Equivocators.'
Journal
of Philosophy
1980.
R.E. Jennings and P.K. Schoich, "The Preservation of Coherence"
Siudia Logica 43:1/2
(1984).
P.K. Schotch and R.E. Jennings, "Inference and Necessity"
Journal
of Philosophical Logic
9,
August 1980, 327-340.
G. Priest, "Logic of Paradox",
Journal
of
Philosophical Logic 8,
219-241.
R.E. Jennings and D.K. Johnston, "Paradox-tolerant Logic",
Logique er Analyse.
1984.
Course Plan:
S&atcgies for non-trivial inference from inconsistency may be classified according to the
kinds of inconsistency they tolerate. Three sorts of inconsistency are studied in the literature: (I)
inconsistency of data from distinct sources,
(2)
inconsistency in data from a single source, and
(3) inconsistency due to paradox. The readings and weekly meetings will consider these three
kinds of inconsistency in that order, with about four weeks devOted to each.
I
100

 
1MON FRASER UNIVERSITY
NEW GRADUATE COURSE PROPOSAL
CALENDAR INFORMATION:
Department-
Philosophy
Tide: ?
Directed Studies V
Description:
Credit Hours: ?
Vector:
ursc Number:
?
855
Prcrcquisitc(s) if any:
ENROLLMENT AND SCHEDULING:
Estimated Enrollment: ?
When will the course first be offered: _92-1
or
2
2
±
-
}
?
required
-
-
JUSTIFICATION:
This increases the number of courses available for graduate instruction in a small
graduate programme in which courses must be designed individually for a diversity
of students.
RESOURCES:
Which Faculty member will normally teach the course:
_Any dept. member
What are the budgetary implications of mounting the course:
None
.
Are there sufficient Library resources (append details):
Yes
Appended: a) Outline of the Course
b)
An indication of the compctcncô of the Faculty
c)
Library resources
Approved: Departmental Graduate Studies Committee:
Faculty -
Faculty:
Senate
give the course.
Date:
A
p
r 4 1991
Da t
e::
:
?
:'
I
Date: ?
7/73
Dace:i/
Senate: ?
Date:______________
ID'

 
(a)
Outline of the Course
The attached description is mdrely a smp1eof a cusc which i
i
jighi bo
given using this number.
(b)
The course will be offcftd in areas in whith dcprtmtnt rntnbr
competent to give courses at a taduan level
(c)
The course will nOrmallyhave only one Or two studuits, The
dc(LiCnLS
own
resources in books and journals will be sufriendfit.

 
SUGGESTED OUTLINE FOR PHILOSOPHY
855
.
?
Directed Studies in Philosophy of Language
Prepared by Martin Hahn
REQUIRED TEXT:
Steven Davis (ed):
Pragmatics, a Reader, Oxford University Press, 1991
COURSE DESCRIPTION
For philosophers, unlike linguists who have a richer taxonomy, the study of natural language has
traditionally been divided into three Categories: syntax, semantics and pragmatics. Of these,
semantics has been the major subject of study for Philosophy-of-language. -Semantics.-after all-
It
.
i1swersquestion-, about truth-conditions, validity, meaning, etc. There is nothing particularly
philosophically interesting about the syntax of natural languages, it would seem. Pragmatics, on
the other hand, has been seen as the catch-all category of variations in usage which semantics
couldn't capture because they depended on the context of utterance, conversational background.
interests of the speaker and audience, etc. In other words, the category of pragmatics has been
used largely to account for those unwieldy linguistic phenomena that threatened the purit
y
and
universality of semantics. The alternative to maintaining the distinction has seemed to be a
radical version of the Wittgenseinian thesis that meaning is use, construed as an injunction to
give tip
on the systematic study of meaning, i.e. semantics.
Beginning as early as the mid 1960's, this account and dismissal of pragmatics has been seriously
challenged. The argument, proposed in different versions and strengths
by various
philosophers.
hinges on the premise that the truth-conditions of certain (perhaps most) sentences cannot be
given without considering their particular context of utterance. This, in itself, was not a new
observation. What was new were arguments to the effect that what such sentences expressed
could not be rendered by an equivalent context-independent sentence.
Much
of the material in
our reader concerns these arguments, various responses to them, and attempts to re-draw the
semanics/pragmatics distinction in light of this debate. Near the end of the course, we will
consider some particular issues in pragmatics: presupposition, metaphor, irony, and the relation
of pragmatics to psychology.
COURSE REQUIREMENTS
Students are expected to come prepared to participate in the discussion each week. The grade
will be based 20% on class participation, 80% on a 15-20 page term paper.
LIBRARY RESOURCES:
The required readings are all contained in Steven Davis's
Reader.
Research materials for ccrni
papers are mostly in major journals the library subscribes to or
available
in the department.
0
i Db

 
Review
f ?
SflIt.t
of a
Proposed.
joint
PhD. in Philosophy:
Simon Fraser University and
the University of British Columbia
Brian F. Cheila
?
Deparrnent of Phiosoçy?
The University of Calgary.
?
24 May 1993
Introductory remarks. in what follows, I consider, as requested, the
proposal for
a joint Ph.D. program in the philosophy departments at Simon
F
raser
University
and the University of British Columbia. To create the proposed joint, program is
also, however, to inaugurate a philosophy PhD.
program on its own at Simon
Fraser University. Thus, secondarily,
I
have assesd the proposal in these terms.
as well.,
The sections below
address
(
the main, points raised by Bruce P. Clyman; Dean
of Graduate
Studies at Simon Fraser,
in a
letter to me dated 19
Ap . ri
1993:
1.
The academic merit and structural integrity of the proposed
program
2.
The adequacy of the faculty and other resources available to
the proposed program for achievingits intended goals
3.
The demand for the proposed program among: prospective
students
4.. ?
The demand fér graduates of the proposed program
1. Academic
merit, and structural integrity of the proposed program.
The pro-
posedjoint program gets high marks on both counts, judging academic merit, pri-
.
0
kDA

 
SFU/UBC Joint Ph.D. Program
?
2
manly on the faculty (see section 2 below) and on the curriculum of the proposed
program.
The new graduate courses to be introduced at Simon Fraser University, together
with those already on the books, will provide a curriculum adequate to Simon
Fraser University's own graduate program and should be attractive to students
from the University of British Columbia as well.
The proposed joint program integrates Simon Fraser University and the
University of British Columbia securely in respect of admissions and crediting,
and likewise in respect of curriculum, given proper attention to the difference in
the length of terms at the two universities.
2.
Adequacy of the faculty and other resources available to the proposed pro-
gram for achieving its intended goals. Numerically, the philosophy departments
of Simon Fraser University and the University of British Columbia should afford
sufficient personnel to accommodate the increased graduate teaching courseload
and to provide the requisite graduate supervisors for the anticipated maximum
of forty-five enrollees in the proposed joint program. From a qualitative stand-
point, Simon Fraser faculty will provide a strong component: based on the four-
teen vitas submitted, more than two-thirds of the department members are quali-
fied to direct Ph.D. theses. The picture for the University of British Columbia is
less well-evidenced—of the sixteen vitas submitted, three are up to date, seven
are current only to 1989, six to 1987. Nevertheless it seems that more than two-
thirds of the faculty are well qualified to direct Ph.D. theses, and some of the
others are probably competent to do so as well.
The library resources of Simon Fraser University are alone barely sufficient to
support a Ph.D. program. But the combined resources of the two universities pro-
vide holdings that are certainly adequate.
3.
Demand for the proposed program among prospective students. Given the
paucity of Ph.D. programs in the Canadian West, particularly in British Columbia,
there should be considerable demand for the proposed joint program. It will be
particularly attractive in light of the range of interests and expertise among the
faculty at both Simon Fraser University and the University of British Columbia.
In the Canadian West, the Universities of Alberta and Calgary will be the main
competitors for doctoral students.
a
C]
o6

 
SFU/UBC Joint Ph.D. Program ?
3
4. Demand for graduates of the proposed program. This is a difficult matter
to judge. In qualitative terms, the proposed program will certainly produce first-
rate doctoral students. It is another question whether, in the "downsizing" envir-
onment current in North American universities, such students will readily find
positions commensurate with their qualifications. Persons earning doctorates at
Simon Fraser University and the University of British Columbia will enjoy a
heightened competitive position vis-à-vis those from many other üniversitie in
Canada. What can be said, I think, is that sooner or later (probably sooner) there
will be a resurgence of demand for highly quaIiie4 holders of the Ph.D. Thus it
is probably reasonable to be positive as regard this question.
Conclusions. The proposal for a joint program is well merited. Faculty at Simon
Fraser University have for some time contributed to the Ph.D. program at the
University of British Columbia, and with a joint program in place such contribu-
tions will be regularized and, importantly, reciprocated. As a program on its own
at Simon Fraser University, only the weakness in the area of library resources is
noteworthy (see section 2 above); but this is overcome by access to the holdings
'at the University of British Cohmbia. Thus bothfor a joint program and for a
Ph.D. program at Simon Fraser University the proposal can be strongly recom-
mended.
\V10

 
4 ?
41
2
.
?
Review of Simon Fraser University proposal
loint Ph.D. in Philosophy
I.
?
?
The academic merit and structural integrity of the proposed
?
program.
Every indication is that this is a program of exceptional
merit. It will cover a wide range of contemporary philosophical
problems, traditions, and projects, but is especially focused where
the Simon Fraser department is particularly strong, in mainstream
Anglo-American analytic philosophy, with courses in epistemology,
philosophy of language, logic, and early modern philosophy. The
program is coherently structured, and will complement the U.B.C.
department's strengths most effectively.
?
On
its own
the Simon
__Fraser—pregr-a-m-seems-
most
impressive and active
to rnethescod7
philosophical
ãThdiisiii
program
areas
in
the
British
first,
Columbia. As the other pre-eminent department is U.B.C., and an
arrangement of graduate program interaction with the latter has
been in operation for some years, this new development can only
make a good academic environment better. It promises to make for
a powerful and creative nexus of philosophical activity, at the
highest professional level, in the Vancouver area.
Simon Fraser's Master's program has been in place for twenty-
three years, and clearly has been a healthy and successful
. enterprise. These years have brought considerable experience,
administratively as well as pedagogically, to the department's
faculty. This has been augmented by extensive involvement in the
U.B.C. doctoral program.
It appears very much to be a program development that is due,
that has outstanding quality, and will offer to students two first-
rate doctoral programs, with the combined strengths of both, in
British Columbia.
I*
^LJ

 
II. ?
The adequacy of the faculty and other resources available to
• the proposed program for achieving its intended goals.
• The thirty philosophers listed as comprising the members of
the
?
philosophy
?
departments ?
of ?
Simon
?
Fraser
?
University ?
and
?
the
University of British Columbia for 1992-93 constitute a very fine
collection of philosophical talent, and achievement.
?
Each of the
departments taken separately is a strong, versatile, and productive
complement of professional philosophers.
?
Strength and versatility
are compounded with the two groups-conceived as a unit.
I note strengths by area:
?
8 of the 30 work in the philosophy
of language, ?
8 in philosophy of mind,
?
14 ?
in metaphysics/epistem-
ology--these three constitute an overlapping cluster of central
analytic ?
philosophical ?
categories, ?
where
?
the ?
largest ?
share ?
of
energy and creative ingenuity in Anglo-American philosophy has been
concentrated ?
for ?
the ?
past half-century. ?
With ?
5
?
specialists ?
in
philosophy of science,
?
and 7
?
in logic and philosophy of mathem-
atics, this supplements and broadens a primarily analytic depart-
ment. ?
Normative
?
philosophy ?
is ?
by ?
no means ?
neglected ?
in ?
this
aggregate: ?
12 of the thirty philosophers in the group work as
specialists in ethics or social and political philosophy.
?
There is
also
?
a ?
reasonable,
?
though ?
more
?
modest, ?
representation
?
in ?
the
history of philosophy (9 specialists).
?
(It will be noted that the
numbers indicated will not add up, since each of the philosophers
has more than one specialty.)
All but a few of the thirty are active, regularly publishing
members of the profession.
?
(I do note that a large portion of the
c. v. 's were not up to date,
?
some no more recent than the early
1980 1 s. ?
It would be useful,
?
and augment the program's case,
?
to
have ?
more
?
current ?
information ?
on ?
publications
?
and ?
research
projects.) ?
Several
?
have authored or
?
edited ?
significant recent
monographs, ?
and must have contributed to leading journals in the
profession (Ethics, Mind, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Theoria,
Analysis, ?
and a great many others).
?
A large number are actively
involved in giving papers at,
?
and organizing, major conferences.
Of significance too is that both the current and the preceding
Anglophone editors of Dialogue, one of the two leading philosophy
journals in Canada,
?
are among the thirty
?
(the current editor an
S.F.U. philosopher). ?
It adds disciplinary centrality,
?
as well as
lustre, ?
to ?
house
?
the ?
operations ?
of ?
an ?
important ?
professional
journal.
Library resources also seem entirely adequate for' the proposed
doctoral program.
?
Indeed the aggregated philosophy collections of
U.B.C. ?
and ?
S.F.U. ?
will ?
make ?
for ?
one, of
?
the ?
most ?
substantive
collections of monographs and journals in philosophy in Canada, and
as ?
the
?
library ?
report ?
included ?
in the proposal
?
shows,
?
a ?
fully
respectable and adequate collection from an international perspec-
tive.
There are areas of philosophy that these two departments do
not represent, either sufficiently or at all.
?
There ought to be a
more substantial representation in European philosophy.
?
And it
cannot be seen as desirable that among thirty philosophers only two
'I

 
4
. are women. It would be valuable, for the breadth and vitality of
the program and the department, for philosophers to be hired, when
new positions develop, to remedy these deficiencies.
These qualifications noted, this is a very good group of
professional philosophers, and some among them whose work I know I
would judge outstanding. Certainly faculty and other resources are
fully adequate for the program's intended goals.
^ 0

 
5
III. The demand for the proposed program among prospective
students.
There are approximately ninety doctoral programs in philosophy
in the U.S., and thirteen (general) doctoral programs in the
English-speaking universities in Canada (plus significant compar-
able doctoral programs in philosophy in the United Kingdom,
Australia, New Zealand, and elsewhere). In spite of general
economic recession, and the special financial difficulties and
constraints of universities, philosophy continues to do well, and
to draw large numbers of students to major in the discipline, and
to go on to postgraduate work at the doctoral level.
The S.F.U. Ph.D. program, particularly with the conjunctive
structure that is envisaged with the longer-established U.B.C.
program, may be expected to thrive. Serious students of very high
academic ability, from British Columbia, the rest of Canada, and
elsewhere in the world, will be drawn to this complex of first rate
philosophical activity, able to move back and forth between both
institutions as their programs and special philosophical interests
incline them.
There are several very good Ph.D. programs in philosophy in
Canada, in my view. Most admit only very modest numbers of
applicants each year. Since applicants invariably include large
numbers of non-Canadians, there is in general no difficulty in
securing quite good candidates for a doctoral program.
I think there is little doubt that there will be 'very
extensive demand for the S.F.U. Ph.D. program among prospective
students.
.
.
0
oo

 
6
IV. The demand for graduates of the proposed program.
This is a more difficult or uncertain matter to comment on.
To offer genuinely informed remarks would require well-grounded
information on university faculty demographics, finances, and
patterns in the Canadian economy, over the next fifteen or twenty
years. Universities, surprisingly, have been rather often slow to
discern or predict patterns in their own futures.
The chief employment for people with a Ph.D. in philosophy,
where that credential is utilized, is as a member of a philosophy
department at a university. So the demand for graduates of the
proposed program is a direct function of what the employment market
for academics will be over the next quarter-century.
That said, there is every reason to expect that graduates of
an S.F.U. Ph.D. program in philosophy will be in a strong position
t
o _compete_for_suGh_Jobs--as-there-w1rlbpanadian philosoph-
ical community is reasonably small and reasonably homogeneous.
There is a single national professional association (the Canadian
Philosophical Association), in which both U.B.C. and S.F.U. are
well represented. (There is also a very lively and active Western
Canadian Philosophical Association, in which the S.F.U. philoso-
phers are particularly well represented; the S.F.U. department has
hosted W.C.P.A. conferences twice in recent years.) The S.F.U.
department is well-known, and well-respected, and its recommenda-
tions for its graduates will be taken very seriously by departments
S
??
all over the country. From what I have seen of the department vis
A vis its students at the undergraduate and M.A. levels, I would
judge faculty-student relations to be excellent, and the department
to be an energetic and effective advocate of its graduates.
In sum, I think there should be considerable demand for
graduates of the proposed program (given always the vagaries of the
Canadian academic economy).
0

 
7
Summary
The
ViewSimon
?
Fraser University philosophy seems clearly to have
0
the resources in respect of faculty skills, logistical and
administrative structures, and library resources, to offer an
academically first-rate effective doctoral program. This would
seem to be the case were S.F.U. the only university in greater
Vancouver. The prospect of a joint program with U.B.C., making the
faculty, graduate courses, and library resources also fully
available to S.F.U. graduate students, augments and strengthens
this case.
I would certainly recommend highly that this program be
approved.
Peter Loptson,
Professor,
Director of Graduate Program,
Department of Philosophy,
University of Saskatchewan.
PJL: DF
0

 
Report on the Proposed Joint SFU/UBC Ph.D. in Philosophy
Overview
I support the proposed program. There are clearly the resources on the ground if SFU ifint
to mount a strong Ph.D. program in Philosophy. This is not to say that I have no worries at all. In fact I
have two, which are detailed below, under the headings "the perceived tradition" and "nature of the
program". Both exfoliate into some recommendations to the department, which I offer in the friendliest
possible spirit.
The Perceived Tradition
The existing MA program at SFU does not enjoy an enviable reputation. In fact it is often seen as
a program into which students can vanish, virtually without trace, for several years, to no good effect.
Such a thing is usually a sign that some or all of the members of the department,Jack-commitrnent-to-the
?
- ?
-
— -program LhavebeW uiddthtfhis does not accurately reflect the current departmental
zeitgeist;
that new additions to the staff are deeply committed to the program, and that those whose enthusiasm
might have been called into question are 'off the critical path'.
In spite of this, it might be thought useful, in view of the unfortunate history, to pay special
attention to 'tracking the progress of students admitted to the new program. What I am suggesting is
that each newly admitted student be assigned a committee of three or four faculty (there would be
nothing to prevent the same committee from overseeing the progress of several students). The
?
important thing would be that this committee be required to convene two or three times each semester
to discuss the progress of each student under their supervision. In cases where progress seems to be
flagging, the causes could be sought and possible remedies brought forward. I would propose that this
sort of committee have a charter which empowered it to intervene when, in its judgment, such
intervention would be useful. Such intervention might take the form of restructuring a student's
program of study, of changing a particular advisor, and even,
in extremis,
of recommending that a
student withdraw from the program.
This finely drawn a suggestion is perhaps taking too much upon myself - the basic idea is to
make it very hard; harder than in the majority of existing Ph.D. programs, for a student to fall unnoticed
by the wayside. When it
starts
to happen; when they start to fall (e.g. in the judgment of the sort of
committee I suggest) something should happen. I am fully aware that some students are going to fall by
the wayside (in the grand old days of the Waterloo program more than half of them did) no matter how
heroic are the measures taken to rescue them. That cannot, in my view, be prevented. But what can and
should be prevented, is that no notice is taken of such an event for a significant period of time,
sometimes for years.
The nature
of
the program
I am inclined to the view, which is supported by cvidece from the new-ish Ph.D. program in
philosophy at Dalhousie, that it is a mistake to think of the Ph.D. degree as a kind of D.Phil, with Some
required coursework tacked on. This was more or less acceptable a generation ago when the
. ?
universities were in a period of expansion. New faculty were being acquired, and somebody's research
specialty was an important factor in hiring, especially as many departments were concerned to fill what
\0

 
they thought of as 'gaps'. When a new position came UP, departments would often hire somebody
whose perspective on philosophy was significantly different from that of the existing members. I call
this, with deliberate abusiveness, the zoo theory of how to build a department.
The zoo theory is bolstered only by a perception of infinite resources. It has resulted in a number
of departments in which there is virtually no critical mass of faculty who can engage and stimulate each
other, which fact constitutes a serious drag on the vitality of the departments in question. The day of
the zoo departments is done. Most of them no longer have the resources to acquire mature specimens of
exotic philosophical species. The norm now is to hire only at the junior level, and the people being hired
are now being scrutinized very carefully with an eye to what use they will be in helping (lie department
with its 'bread and butter' activities.
As we all know, enrollments have expanded, in many cases dramatically, over the past few years
- in spite of the predictions of the demographers to the contrary. The participation rate has increased
and our 'jobless' economy has resulted in many people coming back to university in
it
more or less
desperate attempt to make themselves employable. Classes have gotten much larger and, in general, the
academic workload has increased beyond all expectation.
What this means is that when a department has finally got a position (usually replacing
it
senior
member of faculty who has retired or otherwise left the department) they are
not
going to be interested
in hiring somebody who wrote a wonderful thesis (as far as anybody can tell) in Chinese numenolgy
(about which nobody currently in the department knows anything). What they want is somebody who
looks to be able to help them with their teaching load. Of course somebody's research interests are
going to be relevant, but they aren't, by themselves, going to get anybody a job.
It is for this reason that I think that a Ph.D. should be a teaching degree as well as a research
degree. I didn't see anywhere in the written proposal any words to this effect and I think the words
should be there. As a student in the proposed program studies various specialties, there should he some
emphasis on the teaching of the subjects in question. Ph.D. students will have, at least towards the end
of their program, some teaching responsibilities. It ought to be part of the formal program that some of
their classes will be monitored and that they receive advice on improving their teaching. Finally, when
the department prepares the file which is sent out to prospective employers, there should be
documentary evidence that the student knows how to teach several subjects, at the introductory level at
least.
As a final remark connected with the main theme: I was very disappointed to see that the
proposd logic requirement was so thin. At Dalhousie, the logic requirement includes the ability to
teach a two semester introductory course in logic. Since introductory logic is one of the staple 'service'
courses at most North-American universities, anybody who has evidenced the ability to teach that
course is bound to be more attractive in the job market. Even though most of the Dalhousie Ph. 1).
students specialize in some or other flavour of moral philosophy, the ability to teach logic has given
them a decided edge (as I know from our experience).
Respecfully,
Peter K. Schotch
Professor of Philosophy, Dalhousie University

 
May 6, 1993
l)epartment of Philosophy
Iaculty of Arts
4-109 I tumanities Centre. Telephone (403)
AY t9t9
CAj
or
CRADUA
132.33tt
University of Alberta
Edmonton
lJv
--
?
Canada
r&;
2I5
Dr. Bruce P. Clayman,
Dean of Graduate Studies
Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, British Columbia
V5A 1S6
Is
Dear Dr. Clayman:
I have now reviewed the proposal to establish a joint SFU/UBC
Ph.D. program in Philosophy. The proposal seems perfectly sound,
and should be to the benefit of bohinstatut-.ons-----
Re: the academic merit and structural integrity of the proposed
program.
The question of the structural integrity of the joint program
is difficult to speak to. For the moment, the two programs are
simply presented side by side, existing collaboration is formalized
and made symmetrical, and there is notice of intent to collaborate
?
in curriculum development and in other substantive academic
matters.
?
This means that for the moment there is considerable
overlap between the programs. One trusts that the curriculum
collaboration projected for the future will set responsibilities
for emphases in the core and for development of subdisciplinary
areas. Curriculum planning and staff rejuvenation combined will
remediate the problem of too much "integrity" and not enough
diversity.
At present, the important similarities between the philosophy
courses making up the graduate programs at the respective
institutions are these: coverage of the core areas of
epistemology, logic, philosophy of mind, philosophy of language,
philosophy of science. There is also good coverage of moral
philosophy and ethics, although SFU emphasizes pure, and tJBC
applied, ethics. Aesthetics, an area of increasing importance, is
also available at both institutions.
The important differences are that UBC is strong and SFU weak
in the significant area of history of philosophy,
?
UBC. covers the
vital ?
area
?
of
?
metaphysics
?
better
?
than
?
does ?
SFU, ?
and
?
UBC
?
has
strength in the mathematics specialization whereas SF0 does not.
SFU has, in theory, an opportunity to remediate its weakness in the
history of the discipline and in metaphysics, or to open up another
subdiscipline, with the five new Directed Studies courses proposed..
However, ?
the sample Directed Studies course descriptions provided
. ?
suggest ?
that ?
this
?
will ?
not ?
be ?
the ?
case. ?
The ?
practical
consideration ?
of ?
available
?
expertise will ?
likely mean
?
that ?
the
Directed Studies courses will cover material squarely within the
confines of existing named courses
?
(Epistemology, ?
Logic, ?
Social
Philosophy, Philosophy of Mind and of Language.)
\\'?

 
SF0 therefore needs access to UJ3C offerings to obviate a
serious
an
independent
disadvantage
Ph.D.
it
For
would
its part,
have were
tJJ3C
it
will
to
be
attempt
able to
to
offer
introduce
more
coverage
Philosophy
and
Department
depth in
will
core
also
areas
enhance
to
its
its
indifferent
students.
?
reputation
The UBC
?
because
at SF0.
of its formal association with the
w
ell-regarded department
There is one degree requirement which might be re-examined.
4
Fhis is Requirement l.c: "Students entering directly from the
Bachelor's degree must, during the first year of graduate study,
complete six courses with a CGPA of at least 3.33." It is not
clear that those obliged to work or to be care-givers should be
constrained to do a M.A. en route to a Ph.D.
Re: the adequacy of the faculty and other resources.
The proposed program is viable on the presupposition that
staff numbers will remain relatively constant. Given that at least
four professors at SF0 and more at UBC are close to retirement, and
the fact of budgetary cutbacks in most institutions, approval of
the program should imply a commitment to maintaining the complement
of staff. Otherwise, in the next three years SF0 will lose
considerable capacity in core areas such as metaphysics, logic,
language, and e
p
istemology, and have even less flexibility outside
the core, in areas where demand is increasing.
There is need for faculty renewal and for some diversification
of specializations at both institutions. Both Philosophy
departments have a decided "analytic" cast, that is, they bear the
intellectual stamp of
an
approach to Philosophy prominent in
American and British schools from the late
1950s
to the early
1970s. The discipline has changed more than is reflected in the
research orientations of most staff members. (One might note that
the staff
'
-homogeneity is more than a matter of being trained in
similar istitutions with a common philosophical style. It is
still a predominantly white male group. Changing graduate student
enrollments and the demographics of the Vancouver region suggest
more diversity is desirable, however difficult to achieve.)
The SF0 library holdings
in
philosophy are relatively modest,
and apparently reflect the "analytic" training of most of the
staff. That is, the collection is particularly strong in modern
and recent British philosophy. it is of considerable benefit to
SF0 graduate students to have access to the quantity and range of
Material in the superior UBC collection. Certainly those combined
c011ections are adequate to a joint Ph.D. program, given the
adequacy of tJBC's collection to its own Ph.D. program. However it
is desirable that the collaboration between the two institutions in
curriculum development be mirrored by a collaboration in collection
development.
Re: ?
the demand for the proposed program among prospective
students.
-
^\10

 
It is not surprising that the SFU Philosophy Department
receives inquiries about Ph.D. studies.
?
The department i
Is
sufficiently well known and well regarded to cause one to assume
that it already has its own Ph.D. program. Because it is judged to
be better than UBC's department, it might be supposed that it
will
rob UBC of some students. However UBC's fortunes will have turned
with the hiring of a new high profile chair, and with the
opportunity for rejuvenation that imminent retirements provide.
That should mean it can expect to retain students, and that both
institutions will be able to attract more students from outside.
Despite the fact that there are presently very few academic
positions for philosophers, the field continues to attract people.
Philosophy will likely continue to attract people who do not aspire
to academic careers (or who know that their aspirations may be
disappointed by the academic marketplace.) The discipline provides
of
excellent training for a number of professions, as is evidenced by
?
philosophy graduate programs ucha
g_.
t-ha atBbWflng
Green,
by _ l , l.ows h-i-ps--wh
-j
chomote collaboration between
-----------phfidàh
ers and, e.g., members of the U.S. Supreme Court, by
compulsory philosophy courses in some pre-law programs, etc.
Re: the demand for Philosophy Ph.D.s
The Bowen/Sosa report suggests that there will be strong
demand for academics trained in the area toward the end of the
decade. If the projected 20 % shortfall between 1997 and 2002
of
humanitiesacademics is correct, this Is the ideal time to provide
more graduate Philosophy training. (It should be added that the
American Philosophical Association, while retaining confidence in
the Bowen projection, is considering warning graduate students that
current moves to control government debts and deficits make the
future prospects of philosophy students uncertain.) At a
conference sponsored by the Canadian Federation for Humanities held
in Ottawa in 1989 on
.
the matter of employment for humanities
graduates, participants from industry (Bell Canada, IBM, etc.)
indicated their interest in attracting people trained in humanities
subjects into
management,
and
the success of those whom they had
already employed.
This view on the non-academic employability of Philosophy
Ph.D.s is corroborated by the Alberta experience. Some Alberta
Ph.D.s
in
Philosophy have senior government positions, others work
in law, broadcasting, and in computing industries. None seems to
regret the academic training in philosophy, although some regret
the scarcity of academic positions. The only Ph.D.s without
permanent
employment, so far as I know, are those who refused to
consider non-academic employment.
Re: the University of Alberta\University of Calgary collaboration.
The formal arrangements between the Alberta universities are
broaderand looser than the SFU/UBC proposal.
?
Ours is a
?
collaboration that, in itself, does not
entail much
co-planning.
(I attach a copy of the regulations.) In addition to permitting
really strong co-supervisions, its normal use has been to round out
a supervisory committee when additional expertise in the
subdiscipline is needed. In the three years of operation, there

 
have been
25
visitors from Calgary departments to Alberta, and 7
from Alberta to Calgary. Almost all faculties have been
represented. The only difficulties thus far have been the result
of an inattentive reading of the regulations. This has resulted in
some confusion on occasion about whether the visitor is functioning
as an external examiner, as a member of the staff of the student's
department, or as a member of another department in the same
faculty. With that exception, Albertais well pleased with the
arrangement.
The Philosophy Department has twice had a Calgary philosopher
on a Ph.D. supervisory committee, and one of our people has served
in Calgary. Staff and students have enjoyed the closer contact,
the better understanding of the correlate department, and the
opportunity to learn of the visitor's latest research. We hope to
intensify our collaboration. In addition, there have been
tentative discussions about graduate program collaboration between
the Alberta/Calgary Religious Studies departments, but nothing has
come of it as yet. The only other deeper collaborations have been
between our Slavic and Germanic languages people. The Slavics
group worked out and tested a course combining instructor visits
and teleconferenced classes in an area where one of the units was
deficient. This sort of curriculum collaboration is being explored
further. The Germanics group has long collaborated on library
collection development.
In sum, the SFU/UBC proposal looks feasible, and the current
proposed regulations
are sufficiently close to, indeed considerable
refinement upon, the
succes;fu] Alberta model to make one confident
that ?
the ?
scheme will work well.
?
The hope
?
that ?
"In ?
time, ?
with
continuing goodwill
and experience, ?
[SFU and UBC] will
?
find the
academically optimal
?
level of ?
integration"
?
(Proposal, ?
4) ?
is ?
the
only sensible one to
entertain in these difficult times.
?
If in the
long run the two BC
departments collaborate more intimately they
may provide a model
to us all, and could well be turning out some
of the best trained
philosophers in Canada.
Sincerely.
• M.M. Van dePitte
Professor
S
e

 
University of Alberta
?
Inter-departmental Correspondence
. ?
10: ?
Chairs, Graduate Coordinators,
?
date:
?
5 November 1990
and Department Graduate Contacts
our (lie:
1ron:
?
FS Chia, Dean
?
your (lie:
Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research
2-8 University Hall
Subject: ?
Agreements with The University of Calgary
Please find below some information on our agreements with The University of Calgary for the
provision of supervision. I would very much appreciate if you would share this information with
colleagues in your department and if you would add it to the FGSR Graduate Program Manual sent
to you recently.
Section 8.1.8 Supervision Agreements with-The University of-Calgary
The University of Calgary and the University of Alberta have agreements on graduate student
supervision for the following:
• an academic staff member from one university may serve as a co-supervisor for a graduate
student at the other university
• an academic staff member from one university may serve as a member of the supervisory
committee of a graduate student from the other university
The terms of the agreements include the following:
1.
The appointee shall be counted as a regular member of the supervisory committee internal to
the student's home department unless it is agreed at the outset that the member will be
treated as coming from another department.
2.
The appointment should not be made unless a satisfactory level of interaction can be
maintained between the appointee and the graduate student, and between the appointee and
the other supervisory committee members. It is the responsibility of the chair of the student's
home department to define a satisfactory level of interaction and to ascertain that this can be
maintained throughout the student's program.
3.
If additional expenses will be incurred because of the appointment it is the responsibility of the
chair of the student's home department, in consultation with the appointee, to make
satisfactory arrangements for meeting these additional expenses. Otherwise, the appointment
should not be made.
4.
Co-supervisors and supervisory committee members will be bound by the procedures and
policies of the student's home institution and shall be made known to the committee member
in writing prior to approval.
Appointment/approval forms are available from the FGSR office.
FS Chia, Dean
?
oq

 
UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA/THE UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY
?
'V ?
9'
AGREEMENT FOR THE PROVISION OF GRADUATE STUDENT SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBER
PART I: APPOINTEE'S INFORMATION
Name of Appointee: ?
___
?
1
Rank:
Home University: ?
Host University:
Home Department: ?
Host Department:
Curriculum Vitae is
?
U
Attached
U
Already on file with host department
PART II: STUDENT'S INFORMATION
Name of Student:
I.D. Number:
Degree Program:
?
Date Started:
Estimated Date of Completion:
Name of Supervisor:
PART III: AGREEMENT AND SIGNATURES
A.
Appointee: I agree to serve on the supervisory committee of the student named in Part II in accordance with the terms of
the University of Alberta/The_University of Calgary Agreement for the Provision Committee Members. I agree
to abide by all regulations and procedures of the host university for supervisory committee members.
Signature of Appointee ?
Date
B.
Host Department: I agree to the appointment of the Appointee as a full member of the supervisory committee of the student
named in Part II. I confirm that satisfactory arrangements have been made for a significant level of
interaction between the Appointee and the student and his/her committee members. I also confirm that
satisfactory arrangements have been made to meet the additional expenses incurred by this appoint-
ment.
Signature of Chair/Head
?
Date
C.
Confirmation Signatures:
Chair/Head of Home Department ?
Date
Host Graduate Dean
?
Date
Home Graduate Dean
?
Date
?
^ ;[
0
?
0-
Distribution: White-Host Graduate Faculty Green-Host Department Yellow-Home Department Blue-Home Graduate Faculty Pink-Appointee
1989/12

 
Ir
U
ME
lo: ?
B.P.
Clayman
I)ean of Graduate Studies
Subjeci:
?
external reviews of
proposed joint Ph.D.
in philosophy
MORANDUM
From: ?
P. l-lansoii
R. Jennings
Philosophy
Date: July 16, 1993
.
- - _W_e are on_the_whole veiypleased with theendorsements,-in-these-rev-ie-ws--of the-proposed Ph-. D—
.- -
programme in particular and of our department in general. We arc also most appreciative of the
concerns raised (few in number) and of the constructive suggestions.
With respect to adequacy of faculty, Margaret Van de Pitte and Peter Lopston both noted
weakness in the area of history of European philosophy. It is true, there are gaps. Neither the
URC nor SFU departments has
it
medievalist or Kant scholar, for instance, and only UBC has an
historian of ancient philosophy. And it would be nice to have more historians around. Still, this
is not atypical. There are really only a handful of departments in North America with strong
comprehensive complements of historians. People who are planning to work in the history of
philosophy gravitate to such places. But if the issue is whether there is enough historical
competence, between the two departments, to give a Ph.D. candidate the historical background
she needs for the primarily nonhistorical issues she is likely to he pursuing with us, or to prepare
her for teaching history of philosophy at the undergraduate level, then we would argue that the
proposed Ph.D. programme is adequately served.
Peter Skotch noted that there was a period during which the SFU M.A. programme produced few
graduates. But more recently this has turned around. We graduated five last year and are
graduating five more this year. Skotch suggests assigning each incoming student to a committee
of three or four faculty overseers who will meet to assess the student's progress two or three
times a term. But it seems to its that that many meetings would he rather intrusive. And one
advantage of our current practice of assigning
it single faculty member as an incoming student's
11M R11
tutor' is that it is less impersonal.
Rut
we really liked Skotch's suggestion that we emphasize teaching skills more. For instance,
college teaching represents a potential growth market for Ph.D. students, and it is a candidate's
teaching skills that is of primary interest to a college.

 
Simon Fraser University
?
Memorandum
I ?
ANc
L
STUr
To:
Dr. Bruce Clayman
Dean of Graduate Studies
Re:
Joint Graduate Program
Proposed memorandum of agreement
From:
R.E. Jennings
Graduate Chair, 4
Date: ?
November 18, 1992
Enclosed is a draft memorandum intended to serve as the basis for an administrative agreement
between UBC and SFU on the running of the proposed joint graduate program. If you think that
it is all right as it stands, I'll try to arrange a meeting with the UBC (D Graduate people and Dean.
If you have any suggestions for changes, I'll send a revised version to UBC before organizing
the meeting. Some of the points are ones which we, for our part have already accepted and
incorporated in our proposal (transcript records, for example.) Their inclusion in the agreement
is intended to get the same assurances for the UBC (D Department that we have provisionally
received.
II

 
.
U.B.C./S.F.0 Joint Graduate Program
?
Agreement on Registration, Credit, Library use and Transfer
1 Preamble
The Philosophy Departments will operate a joint graduate program upon terms set out in [Name
of Document]. The general aim of this agreement is to ensure that the cooperation of the two
departments be such as to lead to certain academically desirable conditions:
I. Such a cooperative program must overcome the obvious psychological obstacles
inherent in its geography. Students must be helped to feel equally at home among other
graduate students in courses at either university, and encouraged to have contact with
fellow students at either site. We can help create the ambience -of a single cohesive
graduate program,-by-so arranging-n ttSthdt
a. In the matter of coursework,
students can register, with nearly equal ease, in courses at either
university.
ii.
students can participate in courses at either university on equal terms
with students registered at that university. This requires equal access
to library resources.
iii.
students' transcripts record in some manner the institution at which
their courses are taken
b.
?
In the matter of supervision, it is recognized that:
i.
Official responsibility for a student's supervision must lie within the
disciplinary reach of the dean charged with responsibility for the
student's fair treatment.
ii.
Doctoral supervisors must be accorded accurate acknowledgement for
their role in postgraduate research.
iii.
Accordingly a student in the program must be permitted, after any
number of terms in the program, and with the approval of both
departments, to change registration to the university of his or her
proposed principal supervisor.
^q
p'3

 
Accordingly, it is agreed that a student admitted to the program and registered at one of the
universities shall be given access to the resources of the other university according to the terms
set out below: ?
&I
2 Registration in courses:
a.
The student will be permitted to register in graduate Philosophy courses in
accordance with the terms of the Western Deans' Agreement.
b.
The power to authorise such registrations will be delegated to the Graduate
Studies Committee of the department offering the course.
c.
The student will be bound by the same deadlines as those applying to students
at the university at which the course is taught.
d.
The student's transcript will record the course in such a way as to make evident
in which university it was taken.
e.
The student will be exempted from activity fees at the university offering the
course.
3 Credit and Transfer
a. When the requirements of supervision require it, the student will be permitted
to transfer registration to the university with full credit for all graduate courses
successfully completed in the program.
4 Library Use
a. The student will have the use of all library facilities on the same terms as a
student registered at that university.
4^1
—2— ?
^ '4A

Back to top