S.94-17
O ?
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
OFFICE OF THE VICE-PRESIDENT, ACADEMIC?
MEMORANDUM
To:
?
Senate
From: ?
J. M. Munro, Chair
Senate Committee on Academic Planning
Subject: ?
New Student Intake Targets for 1994/95
Date: ?
February 17, 1994
The Senate Committee on Enrollment Management and Planning and the Senate
Committee on Academic Planning have recommended the following actions for
consideration by Senate:
1.
Motion on Admission Targets by Basis of Admission for Summer and Fall
1994 and Spring 1995
• ?
"That Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of Governors
the admission targets as outlined in Dr. Wattamaniuk's memo of January 31,
1994, and further, that SCAP be delegated authority to adjust these targets
based on the enrolment experience in the Summer, 1994 and Fall, 1994
semesters, consistent with the University's overall enrolment target."
2.
Motion on Admission to the Faculty of Science for 1994/95
"That Senate approve and recommend to the Board of Governors the
admission targets for admission to the Faculty of Science as outlined in Dr.
Wattamaniuk's memo of January 31, 1994."
0
SCAP
94-10
.
?
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
MEMORANDUM
TO: Senate Committee on
?
FROM: Walter J
.
Wattamaniuk
Academic Planning
?
Director, Analytical Studies
Secretary to SCEMP
RE: New Student Intake Targets ?
DATE: January 31, 1994
for 1994/95
Action taken by the Senate Committee on Enrollment Management and Planning at
its meeting of January 28, 1994 gives rise to the following two motions for
consideration by SCAP. Documentation is attached which provides more
background information.
Motion 1.
'That SCEMP approve and recommend approval to SCAP the following global
undergraduate admission targets to SFU for each basis-of-admission group and
for each of the semesters in 1994/95.
.
I
Admission Targets
1994-2 ?
1994-3
1995-1
B.C. GRXII
50 ?
1,550
100
B.C. College
550 ?
900
450
"Other"
325 ?
800
450
Total Intake
925 ?
3,250
1,000
Motion
2.
That SCEMP approve and recommend approval to SCAP the following
undergraduate admission targets into the Faculty of Science for each basis-of-
admission group and for each of the semesters in 1994/95:
Admission Targets
1994-2
1994-3
1995-1
B.C. GRXII
10
420
20
B.C.
College
50
70
20
"Other"
25
70
20
Total Intake
85
560
60
(The number of new students proposed for the Faculty of Science is included
within the global target contained in the first motion).
WJW:cr
Attach.
I.
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
?
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Senate Committee on
Enrollment Management
and Planning
RE: Undergraduate Admissions
?
Targets for 1994/95
FROM: W.
Wattamaniuk, Director?
Analytical Studies
DATE:
January
26,
1994
[I
The Ministry of Skills, Training, and Labour has indicated that they may provide funding
for an increase of 485 full-time equivalent (FTE) undergraduates at Simon Fraser
University for the fiscal year (FY) 1994195. This represents an increase of 4% from our
funded enrollment base in 1993/94.
With this information, and as a result of discussions with ihe Director of Admissions and
the Dean of Science, I am proposing enrollment and admission targets for 1994-2, 1994-3
and 1995-1 as follows.
FTE ENROLLMENT TARGETS FOR 1993/94
The latest estimates indicate that we will come close but short of our funded enrollment
target of
12,114
FTE for FY1993/94 -• we expect that actual enrollments will be about
12,019 FTE, a shortfall of
95
FTE.
Assuming an additional 485 funded FTE, it follows that our actual under-graduate
enrollment base will have to increase by at least
580
FTE in 1994/95. This represents a
year over year increase of 4.8%.
ADMISSION TARGETS FOR 1994/95
Allowing for FTE's expected to be generated by undergraduates continuing from previous
semesters, or estimate of new students required to achieve the funded enrollment targets
for 1994/95 is as follows:
Intake of New
FiscalYear 1994/95
?
Students
Summer semester, 1994
?
925
Fall semester, 1994
?
3,250
Spring semester. 1995
?
1.000
Total intake ?
5,175
Table 1 provides a comparison with actual admissions data from previous semesters.
It should be noted that SFU's total intake of new students was 5,018 in 1993/94. In
modeling enrollment flows , it has been assumed that retention rates for continuing
students will remain constant.
F--]
L
is
PH
.
ADMISSION TARGETS BY BASIS OF ADMISSION FOR 1994/95
Within the global targets identified above, there are, broadly speaking, three groups of
students for which separate targets must be identified at this time. These are B.C. GRXII,
B.C. College Transfer, and "Other." 'Other" includes University Transfer, Degree Holders,
Mature, Out-of-Province GRXII or College Transfer, Visiting, Special Entry, Concurrent
Studies, B.C. GRX.T, B.C. Technical School, etc.
We are proposing that the admission targets for each group be established as shown below
for each of the semesters in 1994195. The corresponding minimum Grade Point Averages
required for admission have been estimated and are also shown. Forecasts of student
demand for admission by semester and admission group are consistent with the GPA
cutoffs required.
Admission Targets
Minimum Grade
Point Average or %
1994-2
1994-3
1995:1
(Estimate)
B.C. GRXII
50
1,550
100
80%
B.C. College
550
900
450
2.50/2.00
"Other"
325
800
450
as required
Total Intake
925
3,250
1,000
Note that for B.C. college transfer students with an associate degree, a minimum of 2.00
will be required. Transfer students without associate degrees will likely be required to have
a 2.50 entry GPA average.
ADMISSION TARGETS FOR THE FACULTY OF SCIENCE IN 1994/95
Fall, 1994, will mark the third academic year whereby students will be admitted directly
intothe Faculty of Science.
The number of new students proposed for the Faculty of Science is included within the
global target and is shown below.
Admission Targets
?
Minimum Grade
Point Average
1994-2 ?
1994-3
?
1995-1 ?
(Estimated)
B.C.
GRX.TI
10
420
20
?
3.00
B.C. College
50
70
20
?
2.30
"Other"
25
70
20
?
as required
Total Intake
85
560
60
[1
fwJw
DISTRIBUTION:
J.M. Munro, VP Academic and Chair, SCEMP
J. Osborne, Associate VP Academic
R. Marteniuk, Dean of Applied Sciences
A. Lebowitz, Associate Dean of Arts
R. Rogow, Dir., Undergrad. Programs, Business Admin
R. Barrow, Dean of Education
iqL^
N. Heath, Director of Admissions
R. Heath, Registrar
J-L. Hoegg, Dean of C. Studies
T. Morrison, Student Senator
A. Watt, Director, Acad. Ping. Services
C. Jones, Dean of Science
Table 2 provides a comparison with previous semesters.
=
U.) C') C'.
2l c'.
I T NC
C)j r- C')
I:
C),
U)
C)
N
C
l
) cc
CO
co
Lo c
C
• 1 -
C C'.
('41 C) ('4
-
U)
C
—-
(O
C
C6 ?
dcD.
I•1
0 ?
=10•c'jcc
0
2
C')
CD
'-
??
'ClC)O)'-
or
-C.0
coU) ??
•-1C)0N
2JC)C)U ?
'C.
U)
co
?
Cl.
?
C)
N ?
-
N
0
N. ?
U)C'
o
I
.
-
fib
0
0 ?
CV CN
o
co
(0
C'.; ?
C)I(tO)C
C)
C)
(C
o
I-.
--
o
Jc. O -
I-I
C) C).
g'Lt)Lt)
I
. -
.
?
C'.!
U)
;N N
ok
o:4
.!
1
?
O
O,'r.c'j
at
l
.,L)It)
i r
El
U) U)
Ir
N ('4
(0
U.
C, 0 C
>-I
('4
C'4N
01
0
0
..C)tt)N
2 ?
—Ic
ON'-O
0
>-l.NC')('
CU)r.
N
CV
too
jC')N
_Lt)0
U, 0
N Cl
(I)
CA
0
d
-0N.C)
0
?
U"
0
(O
0
C'):C
•
0 ?
C
Io
U_I
?
Ii,
N
t
IEo 0 C
?
0U)
'
•i
('4
0. ?
.I0'•Cc
I
T
Lo
2 ?
>-IC')
0
oc
0
('4
0 ?
o ?
0 ctjC
U_I
?
U)
Lt
('4
Io 0 C
_Io F's C
cti c..i
Q
0 ?
d.C. C)N
C)C
2 ?
V'')C'
0
0t
.EE
0
co
C';
0
?
= I
?
C';
CD 0
('4
0
?
I ?
o
0 -
C
N
0
t6 c
co V')C'
o
=
C ) U.) r-
o
C;
2
-
Il)
N
(D1
C)'.-
C- ?
U).-
-
0
' ?
0 -
j)c
•
C\itS)
¶_
C')
U)
.
'C)T'.C')
-C)C')
('4
0
CC
jC'40'
N.
Cl)
0
(0
C')I C) ?
CD
1C)o0r-.
C)
C')jIt
N C
I'-c
co.
Ci0•
('4.
.- -
?
-
()
CO
0
N!0.-v
Jc')0N
U)
0
C) LO
INC')CC
I'-
c')
C)
o
0
0
I-
=-
<JLJC).
o
=I(')C)0)0
=I':
iotc
4
o
NNO
U)
C'i.-C'JC-
o
C)INC)C'4
Lttt
C)
O-
.-C
N
N.
1C)U,U)C)
•Ho.o
co
.1U)
c
O)
0 c
C') C-
Cl
N-
U)
C)
C')IC)U)O
IT to CD
1
C)
C')IN
J0
N'
C) (C
C
N
C
co
lU)—
eNNC)
'C
0
•J
C'J10'CC
in
Cl.
°
o
I-
o
•i.-
=1
=-
oq —
<IC)
oq-
00
o
o ?
oE
_o0•
_•0
LI)0 cr
-C
?
C., ?
-
?
C.)
C) ?
. ? C) ?
. ? 01
E
U
)
0
?
00-
cv
o ?
C)C)C'J0 ?
NC)(0
?'?
o
?
r- 0 c
0 1'J N..- 0
?
0
tHc;d
o ?
r-.-.-c
?
0
?
'-0 ?
r-----o
N-U)
C)
?
?
C)000N-
C')Ir)oC)CSJ
C) ?
''- (0
?
?
C)
C)0C\JU)
(0
2 ?
2
,-
N. ??
0OC)
'Je,J
' ?
?
?
C)I'
C0(0
J0r-
m It
, ?
r) ?
0
N. ?
000 ?
C)C)('- ?
C4 ? Ii)
(0 ?
JO
CD
0
N-
LI
(0j CJ C1
U)0
-U)
Ll.I ?
C,j
CJN
Io•
2
00C)C)
?
>'
2
0
LI)
I2
-.
•-
?
!J)Lt)Lt)
0
0
(0 0
0
IrJ
C • ,J csi
—p0.
c,JC,.J
LO U) ?
CJN ?
0
2 >'
a-
lU)0
CJN
0
o
2 >
U)0
o
2
?
t-.
?
or- o
C)
?
N.
?
.-C\lC
?
IC\J ?
..JN.NN-
.-
?
0 ?
C'C')C)C'
?
PLO ?
• ?
(•JC,,J
0
?
='-.-
0
I
e 0-
0 C-0
Lr)
?
m
?
o
2
C)
cli 0L)
(0
C .'J ?
•J0LO
t-I
U)
L()
ctl
-r
U) U)
CV
?
C\j
>I
'
0
C . ) Ir
.
ci
0 C
roN.r
.:J
Cl)
0 U) Li
??
0
,-
(0
c
. I C,
LLr
C
LU
U
Liii
U.
0
<
H
>-
U.:
-
-
-
-
.-
.-
2
12
11I—
€1)
2
11
I—
(
N-
(
U)
U)
U)
Q
OC)
CO
U)!O
OC)
IoOC)
<corn.
<1(0(0.
<1(0(0.
<corn.
<icoco.
<1(0(0.
6
Additional Information Regarding New Students
TABLE A. & GRAPH A.....Basis of Admission- "Shares"
• Our largest admission group consists of students who transfer from BC
Colleges.......39% of all new students.
•
BC secondary schools continue to provide us with about 27% of all new
students.
• Mature Student entry now contributes only 4% of all new students..., down.
from over 15% in 1981/82.
TABLE B .... Gender and Average Age of New students
'The average age of new students has declined from 25 years to 23 years over
the last five years. This is largely due to the increasing proportion of
students coming from college and secondary Schools.
'Females students make up 58% of all new admissions to SFU.
.
P_j
190
CO
a)
E .LD
C) 0
CO —
(I)
CO —
C
o
(C) 0
UC ?
-
C)
E
cu
C)
O)
-(0
CO
(C)
D C
to
?
C)
C)
in
a
E
C o
o .
C
U,
• ?
(.
o
Cc
a
C)
-v; ?
. ?
•
a,>
0 ?
-
EoE
o
Ll
'• ?
U) ?
4
CO
U)
0
0
0
0
0
0
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C;
0
0
0
0
U)
N-
0
N
C)
0
N
N
N
N
N
(C)
N
N
N
N
i 0) 0) C)
(0 - ?
)
N-
0)1 ?
U)
?
C)
U) (0 (0 0)
.
? -
N U) .– .– N
C)C)
0)
C)
-
U)
N
0
,–coN
?
U)
0
CD
0
C)
?
—
- N
CD
CD
U) ?
N- ?
N
U)
(0(0
0)1 '–
U)
C) C)
(0
0
CD
C)
C
?
.– L ?
N
Ic
t
C) .– C)
o1
'
0)1
-
1
N
C)
N-
-
-
?
U)
0 co
N
I
c)
(0
T
?
(0
0 (0-.-
.–
.-
N
0)1
01
U)
N
N
C)
(0
U)
(0
C)
0)
0)
(0
N
.–
N-
C)
N-
V j .–ac t ?
(0
CD
co
1
(0 .– C)
N-
0 0
(0
N
CC)
?
.– C) 0 0
N c
U)
;i
o
Vj
(f)
CO
C) .–qlT
CDI
co
LO
?
0)
0)N
M N-
N
?
?
'-(0
C).-
?
CDI'
zfl
?
-
N.jN-
CDl
-
N
??
N)U)U).-U)
N
CJ(0
N
N-
I
T
(0
(0
C)C\J
(ON
cDt '-
(01
(0
i
CD
I
t
N-
'–It
It
CDI C)
?
N-
0 0)
U)
N
C)
CDI
U) 0(0(0
CDN
-
CDI
lc'J_N
?
?
1
0
m
0
CD
(0
CD
CDI
i 0
?
N- C) .–
(0
N
D
CC)
I .– C)
U)
0 .–
N-
C)
CD
C) ? (0 (0
co
x
('DI 0
C)
0(0
CD ?
(')
C
coICD
?
0C'D 00)-
?
cli
CO
o c c'
CD .-
C
N
(0 ?
<
0
N
C') (0
c C')
co
I
C')
t
co
N
(0
C)
N
U) CD
CD! '
C-)
0
co
U)
'
U)
0
N-
C')
CCCC')CDU)
CN
N
(00)0
C')
N-
C')C'DU)II
.–
II
C')
(0
C
0
C)
<
C')
U)
Lt)*(OI
0
C)U)
N
N-
N-
N- '-
N-
-
N
N-
. -c)l
?
Hi
-
I
LI)
0
0
N
0
it
C')Lt) C')
N
CD
LL)0)
U)
'
O)IN
co
(0
LO
co
N
C)
C)
C l ) -
LO
-
0
N-
N -
—:
U)
.–
N
Cl)
—
U)
(0
N
0
N
0)
I
ccoo(0N-
.–
0)00) C) CC)
C')
'-
0
.-
CD
N-
CD
0
0
LI)
LO
C
l )
N-
CDC'J
CD
IN
N
.–
—
C')
C')
N-
C')
CD
(0
—:
L()
Cl)
0(0(0
LI)C
N-
(ON-.-CC-
•
CD
IN
N
— .–
-
CD
co
N
0
" s-
CD,
N -
C')
N
0)0)
C
coI
N
N
-
C/)
a
C)
(0
N
U)
Z
U)l
U)
.
-
,
'
-
-
CD!N
1(0
C)
N
NNONN-
N-CDN-
(
I
i
C'J
C)
C')
N-
CD
u.
-
-
U)
0)
-CDCDC)N
-
(0(0
Lt)
)
C l )
N
.–
0
co
(0
N
-:
<
cr
<
C')l
U)N N
QQ
'- U)
NI
-
CD!N
N
.–
-
z
N
CD
U)
N-
9
U)
C)
1
0)
U)
CD
CC-(0(
N-
6
L
U)
.–
—
.
fl,
LU
-J
im
I -
t
0-c
-
?
0
?
c
?
? C)
?
2t.o ?
I- ?
•5-c
?
)<
?
C) C)
?
-
<000
?
0 0 0 0 'E o
CO ?
=
(0(0(0(0 DO 0<
U,
CD
o
=
I
t
C)
0.2
g
H
()
-
C)
75
co
d000Ea,
=
I-
2
cm(0(0DO
0<
U,
C)
0
I
C)
a,
C)
C)
a
co
C)
?
(C)
CO
0
?
CO
I-
(I)
C
.20
.,
E
:
2
:
•
C
-
=
:<
9
0
0)
.
0)
0)
0
ci
L..
CL)
D
E
=
00
>000,
X
-
><
i.-.
0
a
CL
0
TABLE B
Average Age of New Students by Basis of Admission
89/90
90/91
91/92
92/93
93/94
BC Grade 12
18.2
18.2
18.1
18.0
18.1
BC Colt Tfr
23.0
22.7
22.8
22.9
22.9
Degree Holder
33.8
34.2
32.6
32.3
31.8
Mature
38.0
35.8
35.0
35.6
37.5
Non BC12
20.0
20.4
19.8
19.3
20.3
Other
27.2
26.6
25.0
25.3
25.3
Univ Tfr
26.9
26.6
26.2
25.6
26.0
Total New
24.8
24.4
23.3
22.9
23.1
Gender of New Students in 1993/94
Female
Male
Total
% Female
BC Grade l2
868
710
1,578
55%
BC Coll Tfr
1,083
873
1,956
55%
Degree Holder
355
196
551
64%
Mature
128
56
184
70%
Non BC12
80
79
159
50%
Other
178
116
294
61%
Univ Tfr
209
87
296
71%
Total
2,901
2,117
5,018
58%
0
