1. Page 1
    2. Page 2
    3. Page 3
    4. Page 4
    5. Page 5
    6. Page 6
    7. Page 7
    8. Page 8
    9. Page 9
    10. Page 10
    11. Page 11
    12. Page 12
 
.1
S.95-12
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
OFFICE OF THE VICE-PRESIDENT, ACADEMIC
?
MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
Subject:
Senate
J .
M. Munro, Chair
Senate Committee on Academic Planning
Undergraduate Student Intake Targets for 1995/96
Date:
?
February 13, 1995
The Senate Committee on Enrollment Management and Planning and the Senate
Committee on Academic Planning have recommended the following actions for
consideration by Senate:
1.
Motion on New Undergraduate Admissions Targets for 1995/96
"That Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of Governors,
the following global undergraduate admission targets to SFU for each basis-of-
admission group and for each of the semesters in 1995/96 and that SCAP be
delegated authority to make adjustments based on actual funded enrollment targets
and on actual enrollment experience in 1995-2 and 1995-3.
Admission Targets
?
1995-2 ?
1995-3 ?
1996-1 ?
Total
B.C. Grade XII
?
50 ?
1,500 ?
125 ?
1,675
B.C. College ?
650
?
725
?
550 ?
1,925
"Other" ?
300
?
750
?
425 ?
1,475
Total ?
1,000
?
2,975
?
1,100 ?
5,075"
2.
Mion on New Undergraduate Admissions Targets into the Faculty of Science
"That Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of Governors,
the following undergraduate admission targets into the Faculty of Science for each
basis-of-admission group and for each of the semesters in 1995/96 and that SCAP be
delegated authority to make adjustments based on changes to the overall
enrollment targets and based on actual enrollment experience in 1995-2 and 1995-3.
4 0
?
.... 2
 
EI
Admission Targets
1995-2
1995-3 ?
1996-1
Total
B.C. Grade XII
5
400 ?
25
430
B.C. College
40
70 ?
40
150
"Other"
25
70 ?
40
135
Total
70
540 ?
105
715
(The number of new students proposed for the Faculty of Science is included within
the global target contained in Motion 1 above.)
S
S
 
SCAP 95 - 3a
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
• ?
MEMORANDUM
TO: Senate Committee on
Academic Planning
RE: Undergraduate Student
Intake Targets for 1995/96
FROM: Walter J
.
Wattamaniuk
Director, Analytical Studies
Secretary to SCEMP
DATE: February 2, 1995
In accordance with past practice, SCEMP is bringing proposals to SCAP on new student
admission targets by semester and admission group for 1995/96.
SCEMP is also bringing forward, as a result of recommendations contained in the SCIMO
report, proposals for annual targets for the numbers of students to be admitted into
Majors in limited enrollment programs.
New Undergraduate Admission Targets for 1995/96
The admission targets set out below are based on an expansion of the University's
funded undergraduate enrollment by 450 FTE as approved by SCAP, Senate and the
.
Board of Governors in 1994. Todate, the University has not had any firm indications
from the provincial Government as to the level of FTE enrollments they are prepared to
fund.
Action taken by the Senate Committee on Enrollment Management and Planning at its
meeting of February 1, 1995 gives rise to the following motions for consideration by
SCAP. Documentation is attached which provides more background information.
Motion 1.
"That SCAP approve and recommend approval to Senate the following global
undergraduate admission targets to SFU for each basis-of-admission group and for
each of the semesters in 1995/96 and that SCAP be delegated authority to make
adjustments based on changes to the overall enrollment targets and based on actual
enrollment experience in 1995-2 and 1995-3.
Admission Targets
1995-2 ?
1995-3
1996-1
Total
B.C. GRXII
50 ?
1,500
125
1,675
B.C. College
650 ?
725
550
1,925
"Other"
300 ?
750
425
1,475
Total
1,000 ?
2,975
1,100
5,075
I.
 
2
Motion
2.
"That SCAP approve and recommend approval to Senate the following
undergraduate admission targets into the Faculty of Science for each basis-of-
admission group and foreach of the semesters in 1995/96 and that SCAP be
delegated authority to make adjustments based on changes to the overall
enrollment targets and based on actual enrollment experience in 1995-2 and 1995-3.
Admission Targets
?
19952 ?
1995-3 ?
19961
?
Total
B.C. GRXII
?
5 ?
400 ?
25 ?
430
B.C. College ?
40 ?
70 ?
40 ?
150
"Other" ?
25 ?
70 ?
40 ?
135
Total
?
70 ?
540
?
105 ?
715
(The number of new students proposed for the Faculty of Science is included within
the global target contained in Motion 1. above)."
r
0
 
I
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
?
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Senate Committee on
Enrollment Management
and Planning
RE: Undergraduate Admission
?
Targets for 1995/96
FROM:
W. Wattamaniuk, Director ?
Analytical Studies
DATE:
January
31, 1995
Enrollment Status Report for
1994195
SFU was funded for
12,455
full-time equivalent (FTE) undergraduates in
1994/95. This includes the increase of
340
fully funded FTE. We were also requested
to deliver a one-time "productivity increase" of 118 FTE for which we will receive
partial funding. Our final enrollment target was therefore
12,573
FTE.
Based on enrollments counts at the end of Week 3 of 1995-1, I estimate that
we will surpass our enrollment target by
237
FTE and will report an actual
enrollment of
12,810
FTE to the Ministry of Skills, Training, and Labour (MOSTL)
later this Spring.
Enrollment Funding for
1995/96
SFU has requested that MOSTL provide full funding for an additional
450
FI'E
for a total of
12,905
FTE in 1995/96. We expect this will encompass the one-time
increase of
118
FTE as well as the surplus of
237
FTE and will mean that actual
enrollments need to increase by only
95
FTE in 1995/96.
Assuming the Ministry complies with our request, and as a result of
discussions with the Vice President Academic, Director of Admissions and the Dean
of Science, we are proposing enrollment and admission targets for 1995-2, 1995-3 and
1996-1 as follows.
Admission Tar
g
ets by Semester for
1995/96
Allowing for FTE's expected to be generated by undergraduates continuing
from previous semesters, our estimate of new students required to achieve the funded
enrollment targets for 1995/96 is as follows:
Intake of New
?
?
Semester
?
Students
?
1995-1 ?
1,000
?
1995-3 ?
2,975
?
1996-1 ?
1.100
•
?
Total intake
?
5,075
Table 1 provides a comparison with actual admissions data from previous
semesters. It should be noted that SFU's total intake of new students was a record
5,809 in 1994/95.
3.
 
2
As usual, in modeling enrollment flows, it has been assumed that retention
rates for continuing students, and student course loads will remain unchanged from
one year ago. Additional constraints are included to ensure that minimum entry
GPAs are stable from semester to semester, historical proportions of new students
by basis of admission are roughly maintained and course supply is manageable in
each semester
Admission Targets by Basis of Admission for 1995196
Within the global targets identified above, there are, broadly speaking, three
groups of students for which separate targets must be identified at this time. These
are B.C. GRXII, B.C. College Transfer, and "Other." "Other" includes University
Transfer, Degree Holders, Mature, Out-of-Province GRXII or College Transfer,
Visiting, Special Entry, Concurrent Studies, B.C. GRXI, B.C. Technical School, etc.
We are proposing that the admission targets for each group be established as
shown below for each of the semesters in 1995/96. The corresponding minimum
Grade Point Averages required for admission are as yet undetermined.
Admission Targets
Minimum Grade
Point Average or %
1995-2
1995-3
1996-1
(Estimated)
B.C. GRXJI
50
19500
125
not available
B.C. College
650
725
550
not available
"Other"
300
750
425
not available
Total Intake
1,000
2,975
1,100
For B.C. college transfer students with an associate degree, a minimum GPA
of 2.00 will be required consistent with Senate policy.
Admission Targets for the Faculty
of Science for 1995/96
Fall, 1995, will mark the fourth academic year whereby students will be
admitted directly into the Faculty of Science. The number of new students proposed
for the Faculty of Science is included within the global target and is shown below.
L
Admission Targets
?
Minimum Grade
Point Average
1995-2
?
1995-3
?
1996-1 ?
(Estimated)
B.C. GRXII
?
5 ?
400 ?
25
?
2.89
B.C. College ?
40 ?
70 ?
40 ?
2.40/2.00
"Other"
?
25 ?
70
?
40 ?
as required
Total Intake ?
70
?
540
?
105
Table 2 provides a comparison with previous semesters.
fwJW
.
i/
 
0
L0
?
.
0
Op
??
0
0
9
(V) ?
U) -.Ø
N
?
U)N-C
?
ul
0 ?
0 ? 0
cr)
op
?
op ?
ppp
CM a)_0
?
— ?
_0CC
IL ?
U) ?
u.
N-
0 ?
u
Cal
,u)
LO ?
0
C\J
? C%J
0
d
0 0
?
C
0 0
p
?
'- ?
op ?
ippp
E° N-
•
2
?
El
C V )
?
04
?
C0C'J ?
DIu)cncs
U) ?
U) ?
U) ?
•<
0
° ?
?
W
'4
CO
0) 0
?
?CCN-0
Cu '-
CC 0) 0
?
?
(1)
(000
'- 0
CC
0
0
?
>-IC')COC'J
C00000
?
>-C000
0
LO 0
d
N-
(\J
C\j ?
CM
L( ?
(
LO 0
-!
?
OiN-
Li
LLCC
C)l
L00
(s'
(I)
.-
aD ?
IC) ?
N-
>-
C)J CO
CO
?oo
•=I
0 U)
—
-cc
N-LC)
100
W
I
L) 0
C'J
U)
0
0
?
CU
G)C'JC')
CO CO C)
=
N-
(0
CC
COI
CV)CJ
- 0 N
-
0 ?
C0CC0)
?
c
co
0 ?
CJC\J
0 ?
-CD
i6 L
0
0 ?
OC'jcc)
0 ?
LACLO
LO C\ j C\I
0c.-N-
c;AIL 0LC)4:
0 ?
LC)CC'J
1
0
?
0
0
LC)C,jCJ 0
- 0 ?
(01
N- tO- CO ?
'4 U)
C) .-
0)
IC)
?
?
C)ICO(D
I'4tL
?
0)N-C)
I t ?
0)r r ?
'4
?
r r
0) ?
0)
co ?
(00
CC 10
?
• 0)
CC U)
co
?
U) 0)
'4- ?
CC ?
.-
0) 0 -N-
N-
?
C"J'-'4 ? -
COL()
co ?
LC)L0C)LUC) ?
(0
-.
c ?
?
C)C0C0
CCCO(0CC
IC) ?
C)
?
- ('4 ?
- ?
U)
(0 ?
-0'I000N-
?
.-
C)OLC)
'4:
N - L000 ?
C)U)
LO
N
(C)
`:1
0
0
—
0 Cli
co a
IC)
c . ) 0,
U)J-CJN-
0
CJ ?
0)N-O)C'4
It
LO U)
U)
C'J ?
.-CCLC)LC)
N- ?
(D'-O
'-I I
uJ
-J
I-;
I t ?
C\J
C'JCcO
C\JI
0)
U) 1-
( j
CO
co
Mi ?
co co
U)
?
CI)
?
C)LL)0
co
c,_ ?
'.
It
ID CO
cJ
CC ?
CJCC'J
'4
.
?
L0.-'4
N-
?
LO
It
'4-)CC-
0) ?
0CC10
-
N ?
COCON-
C'J
UD
0
?
?
C'J000
IC)INO)
0)
-
U)COCCCC')
CO
0
?
C0C)C0
('4
0
N-
?
?
('JN--'-
N-0
N- ?
mi LO CO
?
?
CO ?
CON-U)0)
?
(0 ?
C'J.-C)
?
(c ?
,(0CCN-
('4
?
-0) ?
C'4C)0)C0
,-
?
C) ?
aDO)
;
-
?
C)
to
?
N.
to
co
, ?
L()IC)O
- ?
0)! ?
(0(0
F-
IC)
N
0)
C\4
0
0
0
.
- 0 ?
-
?
0
?
- ?
0 ?
o ?
- ?
-co
?
•6
cu ?
-ca
}— ?
co
I-
=E ?
=FE ?
=! ?
= ?
=:
?
=:
(J)Iö
tO.05
?
t1Q o ?
lQq5 ?
tQQ5 ?
1qq
m co ?
co
m
ca co =
 
U)
0)
gtLo0
CM 04
_L00
4
IL
C,
C
g
N- CMJ
M
CM
EW
4
CM -
?
:
A
(0
10.-
N
-
CM
(0
Uill- C\
j ?
LO
0) CM 0 LO
0)
0)
—0C')O)
0)
C').-Co(O
00
0)
CM
CM
0) N-
'-CM
0)
w
oil
c10
rn 0
OLI
LI..
V
a)
0
o0
- ?
o0
co 0
0
LO
o1
?
a,
(1)1
CM
?
CM
?
..-
L ?
C')
•
?
0W
.
?
.-
CDI
0100
CM
(I)
CM<
Cl)
(I)
C)J<
V
0 0
5
0
0 ?
-
0)
—
—
-
j
LI)0
CC
LLcO
LLCMOa)
V
V
o
'-I
WI
U)
.
LO0
0)
co
0
.
(1)
-
U)
0
..
CI)
kci2
IN-LI)
00 LO
0 ?
c
WI
U)
U)
Cl)
U)
•
0
0CMC
ICM.00.0
0
()
_:
?
C)
0
a)I
CM
0) (0
0
C)
0
N-
-v0
>-I
0
Lo ?
04 ?
C\j
00
C;
??
cz
N-
N-.--
LI)Co
0 ?
C'JN--
0
?
(0
N-
C)IC00)CM
N-
(OCM
0)
LI)
0)1
(0 0
(0
CO
N-
0)
0 CM CM
0)1
0)
01
0)
C)
Co
'—CF) ?
.-
N-Q
C)
'-(0'-'-
0)
0)
N-
C)COCMCM
C)000(0
"o '
C
)
'Co
(V)
N-
CM
Co
q CO 0
CM
0)
0) C)
(0
C4
C'J.-LI)
0)
0)1
co
?
cr
U)
0 -
'I)
-
CD
0'.-
E
E°
0
cr
w
U)
Cl)
CM<
'-
'- 0 0
0
0
01
-00 0
c ) 'n 0
0
ol
N'-'--
co to m
'Lr)Oo
LI)
(00) CM
0
0 00 0
100N.
O)l ?
q -
LO
It
CML0Lc)
0)
LI)
CMN
0
0
0
0
1-
0
0
0
It
:!
-
0
Co
CM
LI)
CM
co
L00
N- U
fcJcJ
_LI)0
N-L0
LLccj
Lr)0
N-
.0
CM
CM
U)
0
d
.-0C
0).-0)
N-CDL
0
N-'--
LI)
CMI
CM N-
Co
N-
LI)
0)ILOC'J.-
0)
0)
CM
-CDN-0
'-
m co
0)
U)
'-
.
CN-(O
?
Co
?
CMCMC)CM
?
- ?
C)C)
0)
0=L0CoN-
co
0 ?
N--'-
LI)
LO
(0
?
0)01010
L01010
0)
0)
0
0
?
'-t CM 0
0)
?
• ?
C')(OCMCo
?
N- ?
N-00Co
?
- ?
co
-CMN-
co ?
10 CM
0)
I
1
—
6
-
I—
16
•0
I—
16
I—
-
F-
0 ?
-
=:
=1
F7
=!
cn
75
75
tQQ
<im
tIQ°.
m
-tlQQ-
I
o
?
Q.o
 
.
.
NUMBER OF NEW STUDENTS
?
- ?
•
m ?
CD
- o ?
b ?
b. ?
o
?
o ?
o
o ?
0 ?
0 ?
0 ?
0 ?
0
0 ?
0 ?
0
0 ?
0 ?
0 ? 0
81/82 ?
T ?
.i!_IIIIIHn.[nn
82/83
• ? ___ ?
:
83/84
•
?
•..
84/85
85/86
Fn
86/87 ?
-
?
lifit
?
:
87/88 ?
H - __ ?
JilUt
88/89 ______ ?
1 ?
IlIUM
89/90 -
90/91
Lq
91/92 ?
II ?
I
92/93 —
? -.--•____ -
?
Ill
?
:
93/94
IiII
U
?
ii ?
I_I ?
U
?
11.11
W
00
Q
?
0 W C
2.
?
0
-
0060
z ?
- ?
Q.. ?
-'
CDCD
?
?
CD
- D
?
CD
-
a
-
z
?
-' (
?
'<
-
0
I
C)
CD
-
?
?
?
0
?
-.
C) ?
?
Cl)
-'CD
-1
?
Q
- ??
3
-.
-
?
g ?
CD ?
' ?
C')
cn
0
C)
- ?
(I)
 
81/82
82/83
83/84
84/85
85/86
86/87
cn
87/88
88/89
89/90
90/91
91/92
92/93
93/94
94/95
C)
uj
S
PERCENTAGE OF NEW STUDENTS
- ?
Ca ?
o
o
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
.
•
LI
LI
[I]
•
FI
co
•
0
m
c:
a
o
o
;.
CD
C)
z
0
0
C)
0
CD
CD
CD
-
-'
CD
CD
0
E
CD
=
CD
>
3
CD
CD
0
U)
.
 
L1)I
C', U) LI) '
?
0) ?
N- 0
C') C') 0 CD 0) C', U) 0
0)04 ?
0
Th2
C') 04
C',
0) 0)
0 N 0) 0
C')CDC')C')CDU),-C')U)O
0)04 ?
C') ?
'-
?
0
-.1 '-0)
?
C') LI) .- CJj 0
C',1 0 C') ?
CO ?
0) U) CD 0
CO
0
?
C')
?
0
C\,l
NN04NC')0
'—(00)
0)04 ?
co
?
U)0CDN
.-
?
0
0
(4)
C')
LI) Cl) C') (\J CD 0) 0
0)I0
01 C')
' J ?
c6 C
C')
ui
?
CO
.-
C
?
N N 0
0
0
1 Q
0
C',
C')
C') C', N
C',
N
?
0
?
C')
0)1
N-
?
,-0 00 ?
0 ?
C', CD C', 0 N
C') CO
0) 0
(0104 ?
co
?
. ?
0
CD
(0U)0C')NC',0
N 0) ?
co
0) (0 C', co* 0 0
11 N
?
C',
co
U) ?
LI) C') 0
(0
co C', 0
(ON
0)04 ??
cli
04
C0-.-C','-0
?
,- '-'-0
co
CD]
LO
?
0)040)C'4OO
Lt CD
?
C', U) N- 0)
U)
C') 0
0)104
?
('4
?
'-'-0
LO
CD
M
?
N C',
C',
0
C',
0) 0
CD ?
C') - N
CD
N C', 0
0)04
?
('4
0
?
('4 .-
CD CD 0) .— 0
0)0)
C"
'
- ?
?
C',
?
CDCDLI)0
—.— Co
.--LI)C',CU0
N
C'4
??
C',
0 CD N N N 0
(004 q,tC"4'CDO
U) ?
Cl)
CD
N 0 LI)
?
0
'-040
U)
o .-
?
C
.2
CD ? Con)
-
: ?
Q) a,
<I 0 0 9 0 ?
0
0! 0 0
?
0 E
?
CO =
?
0 m 0
q.
C"
0
I-
U)
a,
0
0
I
a,
a,
0)
0
ad
a)
?
U)
C"
C',
IL)
(0
CD
>-'
• ?
u
E .2?
a,
co
V
CD
a,
0
U)
a, '-
,-
U) CO
a,
a)
'-
rO
I
0
co ?
a)
01
V C
5
U)..
C
0)
0)
>c
0
.00
rL
CO
CO
o
00)
C
U)
CO
i5 ?
.?
'-01
CO
— U).
0 a,
U) '-
a)
ZL/
LO
N
0
C',
0)
0
C',
('4
It
C',
LO
C',
C',
C',
It
C',
cli
LOI N
0)
04
(0
.—
L()
0)
04
0)
(00
LI)
N
N-
0)0)0
.-
(C
.- 04
C
0) (0 .-
C')
U)
N
C',
L
.
0)
0)
0)
0)
(0
N
0)
Ct)
0)1
'
LI) (0
0)
U) 0)
.-
C')
N
01 '-
LI)
C')
U)
0
Ct)
-
0)
C')
0)
0)1
LI) (0 CD
' 0)
0)
.-
Ct)
CD
0
-J
04 ,-
.-
I!)
.- C l )
C',
C',
'-
(0
-
•
cDI'-
041
N
(0
C',
U)
(0 CD
I
T
0
04
0)1
.-
LI)
(0
0) C')
(0
0
C')
0)
N
1
C
Ct)
04
C')
C')
II)
N
0
(0
I
T
CD C',
U)
0
0)1
04
N
(0
II)
04
C')
0
.- 0
0
U)
01 LI)
04
.-
0)
(0
0)
(0 0)
(0
U)
O
C
0)
N
U)
C')
0)
C',
N
(0
cli
C')
.- 0)
CD
CD
N
'-
Lt)
(0 '- (0
.
0)
N
0
0
C
U)
0
CDI
—
C')
0)
(C)
0
C',
U)
c l i
C',
l
S
C')
,-
C')
C')
CO
C')
CD
0)
co1
OD
LO
0)
(0 N
(0
0
'
Z
0)i
N
0)
0)
04
C',
.-
(0
N
Q
lt
0•uS
S
C/)
CDI
'-
Lo)
.-
.
N
I
N
C')
04
CD
N
(C)
('4
C')
C')
(0j
N
(0
04
("4
0) 04
C')
LL
o
C',
,-
('4
C l ) LO U)
LI)
CD
'-
(01
SQ
CO
(01
(0
co
N '-
T
co
(01
C')
C',
N
0 (3)
LI) 0)
0)
2-
U)
a:
w
(01
N
co
U)
0
CD
co
N-
0)
04
cot
C
(0
0 C')
CD
(0
00
CD
U)
z
D
,-,-C')C')NU)Lt)
CE
0)1'—
w
U)
-1
0
('4
N
0)
.- (0
(0
C')
N
00
C) U)
0.-
N-CD
(0
Z
C'
C')
CD
CD
U)
0)
o
a'
-
co
1
0
()
C') 0
(0
CO
0)
0
C',
co
CO
0)
0
C')
0
.-
(0
U)
-4
C\J
0 .-
0)
C')
C')
CD (0
(0
.-
z
w
C
0
D
co
0 ('4
C')
0)
('4
U)
0) 1(0
LI)0)
-It
0)0) CO
CD
N
Ct
0)
(01'-
C
0
z
0
a,
U)
C
-
I
.
.2
a,
0
C-
E
a,
o
bzo>o
-
<
0
41
Oj0O0CW"O
 
TABLE
B
Average Age of New Students by Basis of Admission
89/90
90/91
91/92
92/93.
93/94
94/95
BC Grade 12
18.2
18.2
18.1
18.0
18.1
18.4
BC Coil Tfr
23.0
22.7
22.8
22.9
22.9
23.3
Degree Holder
33.8
34.2
32.6
32.3
31.8
30.7
Mature
38.0
35.8
35.0
35.6
37.5
38.1
Non BC12
20.0
20.4
19.8
19.3
20.3
19.9
Other
27.2
26.6
25.0
25.3
25.3
25.3
Univ Tfr
26.9
26.6
26.2
25.6
26.0
24.5
Total New
24.8
24.4
23.3
22.9
23.1
22.9
.
Gender of New Students in 1994/95
Female
Male
Total
% Female
BC Grade l2
954
881
1,835
52%
BC Coll Tfr
1351
1004
2,355
57%
Degree Holder
380
195
575
66%
Mature
98
41
139
71%
NonBC12
116
86
202
57%
Other
187
145
332
56%
UnivTfr
223
148
371
60%
Total
31309
2,500
5,809
57%
.
go
/0.

Back to top