S.96-20
• ?
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
OFFICE OF THE VICE-PRESIDENT, ACADEMIC
?
MEMORANDUM
To: ?
Senate
From:
?
D. Gagan, Chair
4zv14
Senate Committee on Academic Planing
Subject: ?
Undergraduate Student Intake Targets for 1996/97
Date:
?
February 12, 1996
The Senate Committee on Enrollment Management and Planning and the Senate
Committee on Academic Planning have recommended the following motions for
consideration by Senate:
S
Motion 1:
"That Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of Governors
the following global undergraduate admission targets to SFU for each basis-of-
admission group and for each of the semesters in 1996/97 and that SCAP be
delegated authority to make adjustments based on changes to the overall
enrollment targets and based on actual enrollment experience in 1996-2 and
1996-3.
Admission Targets
1996-2
1996-3
1997-1
Total
B.C. Gr. XII
50
1,510
100
1,660
B.C. College
375
700
450
1,525
"Other"
250
650
350
1,250
Total Intake
675
2,860
900
4,435"
0 ?
over
Motion
2:
"That Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of Governors
the following undergraduate admission targets into the Faculty of Science for
each basis-of-admission group and for each of the semesters in 1996/97 and
that SCAP be delegated authority to make adjustments based on changes to
the overall enrollment targets and based on actual enrollment experience in
1996-2 and 1996-3.
Admission Targets
1996-2
1996-3
1997-1
Total
B.C. Gr. XII
10
345
20
375
B.C. College
40
65
25
130
"Other"
10
75
25
110
Total Intake
60
485
70
615
(The number of new students proposed for the Faculty of Science is included
within the global target contained in Motion 1 above.)"
L
0
SCAP 96-5
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
?
MEMORANDUM
TO: Senate Committee on
Academic Planning
RE: Undergraduate Student
Intake Targets for 1996/97
FROM:
Walter J
.
Wattamaniuk
Director, Analytical Studies
Secretary to SCEMP
DATE: February 1, 1996
[I
In accordance with past practice, the Senate Committee on Enrollment Management and
Planning (SCEMP) is bringing proposals to SCAP on new student admission targets by
semester and admission group for 1996/97.
New Undergraduate Admission Targets for 1996/97
The admission targets set out below are based on the University's funded undergraduate
enrollment targets remaining at the same level as in 1995/96.
Action taken by the Senate Committee on Enrollment Management and Planning at its
meeting of January 24, 1996 gives rise to the following motions for consideration by
SCAP. Please see the attached documentation for more information.
Motion
1.
'That SCAP approve and recommend approval to Senate and the Board the
following global undergraduate admission targets to SFU for each basis-of-
admission group and for each of the semesters in 1996/97 and that SCAP be
delegated authority to make adjustments based on changes to the overall
enrollment targets and based on actual enrollment experience in 1996-2 and 1996-3.
Admission Targets
1996-2
1996-3
1997-1
Total
B.C. GRXII
50
1,510
100
1,660
B.C. College
375
700
450
1,525
"Other"
250
650
350
1,250
Total Intake
675
2,860
900
4,435
[1
I.
Motion 2.
That SCAP approve and recommend approval to Senate the following
undergraduate admission targets into the Faculty of Science for each basis-of-
admission group and for each of the semesters in 1996/97 and that SCAP be
delegated authority to make adjustments based on changes to the overall
enrollment targets and based on actual enrollment experience in 1996-2 and 1996-3.
Admission Targets
?
1996-2 ?
1996-3 ?
1997-1 ?
Total
B.C. GRXII
?
10 ?
345 ?
20 ?
375
B.C. College ?
40 ?
65 ?
25 ?
130
"Other" ?
10 ?
75 ?
25 ?
110
Total ?
60 ?
485
?
70 ?
615
(The number of new students proposed for the Faculty of Science is included within
the global target contained in Motion 1. above)."
WJW:cr
Attach.
0
IN
.
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
?
MEMORANDUM
TO: Senate Committee on
Enrollment Management
and Planning
RE: Undergraduate Admission ?
Targets for 1996/97
FROM: W.
Wattamaniuk, Director ?
Analytical Studies
DATE:
January
22,
1996
(Amended Feb 1, 1996)
Enrollment Status Report .
.
.1995/96
SFU was funded for
12,590
full-time equivalent (FTE) undergraduates in
1995/96. This includes an increase of
135 fully funded FTE for the fiscal year.
Based on actual enrollments for summer, fall, and spring, I estimate that we
will surpass our funded enrollment target by
425
FTE and will report an actual
enrollment of
13,015
FTE to the Ministry of Skills, Training, and Labour (MOSTL)
later this Spring.
Enrollment Funding for
1996197
Although SFU has requested that MOSTL provide full funding for an
additional
200
FTE in 1996/97, it appears likely that this offer will be declined leaving
?
•
?
?
the 1995/96 funded
?
targets in effect. This means that undergraduate enrollments
need to decrease by
425
FTE in 1996/97.
As a result of discussions with the Vice President Academic, Director of
Admissions and the Dean of Science, I am proposing enrollment and admission
targets for 1996-2, 1996-3 and 1997-1 as follows.
Admission Targets b
y
Semester for
1996/97
Allowing for the generation of FTE by undergraduates continuing from
previous semesters, my estimate of new students required to achieve the funded
enrollment targets for 1996/97 is as follows:
Intake of New ?
?
Semester
?
Students
?
1996-2 ?
675
?
1996-3 ?
2,860
?
1997-1 ?
900
?
Total intake
?
4,435
Table 1 provides a comparison with actual admission numbers from previous
semesters. SFU's total intake of new students will have to decline by about 300
students in 1996197.
c3.
2
As usual, the modeling of the intake targets is constrained to ensure that
minimum entry GPAs are stable from semester to semester, historical proportions of
new students by basis of admission are roughly maintained, and course supply is
manageable in each semester.
I have also assumed that retention rates for
continuing students, and student course loads will remain unchanged from
one year ago. If tuition fees increase sharply, retention rates and course
loads
will
decrease and these intake targets will have to be revisited.
Admission Tar gets b y
Basis of Admission and b
y
Semester for 1996/97
Within the global targets identified above, there are, broadly speaking, three
groups of students for which separate targets must be identified at this time. These
are B.C. GRXII, B.C. College Transfer, and "Other." "Other" includes University
Transfer, Degree Holders, Mature, Out-of-Province GRXII or College Transfer,
Visiting, Special Entry, Concurrent Studies, B.C. GRXI, B.C. Technical School, etc.
I am proposing that the admission targets for each group be established as
shown below for each of the semesters in 1996/97. The estimated minimum Grade
Point Averages required for admission are shown in Table 1.
Admission Targets
?
?
1996-2 ?
1996-3 ?
1997-1
B.C. GRXII ?
50 ?
1,510 ?
100
B.C. College ?
375
?
700
?
450
"Other" ?
250 ?
650 ?
350
Total Intake ?
675 ?
2,860 ?
900
For B.C. college transfer students with an associate degree, a minimum GPA
of 2.00 will be required consistent with Senate policy.
Admission Targets for the Faculty of Science for
1996/97
The Faculty of Science has separate admission requirements. The number of
new students proposed for the Faculty of Science is shown below and is included
within the global target.
Admission Targets
?
1996-2
?
1996-3
?
1997-1
B.C. GRXII
10
345
20
B.C.
College
40
65
25
"Other"
10
75
25
Total Intake
60
485
70
Table 2. provides a comparison with previous semesters and estimated
minimum Grade Point Averages required for admission.
.
.
3
/WJW
.
DISTRIBUTION:
D. Gagan, VP Academic and Chair, SCEMP
N. Heath, Director of Admissions
J. Osborne, Associate VP Academic
R. Heath, Registrar
R. Marteniuk, Dean of Applied Sciences
Mark Selman, Director, Extension Credit
E. Alderson, Dean of Arts
S. Shapiro, Dean of Business Administration
A. Watt, Director, Academic Planning
R. Barrow, Dean of Education
C. Jones, Dean of Science
.
Q
0
0
0
U)C'JC'J
0LC)'
1
o
0-0
?
_Jc
00 ??
LLi'
LOC'JCJ
i10
U) ('1
(0 C')
CJ
N-
(0
C
(C
?
CO
cd co - P
(I)
ca
?
lie
0
U)
--
0
0
, ?
LO
10
•
:.I
L..I
?
?
CJ C)
i.
0
=10
,j
UI ?
L()
U)
(A
c
li
0
oP
1co
WI
._I
01•0
-I ?
-. -
C'J
0.o
U4 ?
)
(%1<
0
0
,0
ci
oP
g
0.
0
.
?
c'.i
(
N-
c'J
0.
0.
—ic'
c'J
0
1
0"
C'.j
co
"- -
151
Vi
C)I ?
00
.I
i
ma lr
^
10
CD
CD
U)
U)
c'J<
P
200
C') C'J
U)
WI
0 't (0
>9I
CV)
C')Ci
V
2oo
C')C'J
U)
WI
0
a-cO0)
0
>) C
V
) C'J
0
1
'0-0
0
oP
jN-
'I
>IC')'cJ
0
oP
co
0
U)
c'J<
(0 't
C)
>-IC')C')C'J
0
=
o'
C'j ?
co
CY) co
ol
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Cl
0
1
0-0
R
0
0
I--
A
'o-O
tC')C\I
^
o 'o 'o-O
1-t
Lu
-J
I-;
C)I
C')
N-
-
-
?
U)
U)
- CO
C'J
1
CO
(0
,-
C',l
I
N-U)
Co
0',
a)
?
0)
'
0
Co
-
L03
o
CO
U)
co
C')
C)
(0
C'JLO
0
C)
CO
C
(0
N-
LO
COC')
Co
- Co
0
1 ?
1 ?
1
1
1
to
("1
i-
U)
-
'-
'-I
U)
0)'
c
o
?
-1
0)
0 N-
(0 ?
C) U) C') N
?
'-1
i-
N C)
J
co
0
C
O
Lt) ?
J C) Co LO C')
?
J
?
i-
C'. J
Co ?
U
0
,
-
LO
C'J
i-
?
-
0 U) ?
N-
U) CO
?
'-
U) C')
1
?
1
c'4
j
0
c'i
C')CONC)
c'J
CO
U)
-
C')
U)
C'
J
N
C')
C')00(0
0)
CO
C')
C') C')
(0
C'4
J
(000N-N
N-
cm
U)
C)C)
w-
'
C
U
C)
'-
U)
U)
(0
1
C
-
C'J
i-
C')
N-
CsJ
0
'1'
(0
0
C\1
N-
- '-
0)
C'J C) 0) co
-
cq C')
U)NN-
(0
'
'.1
?
U)
C'4
Ci
C)
N-
N
_.j
'3
11)
N-
CO
0
"-
0)
U)
CO
-
C')
0
'
Co
.J
U)
U)
1
C')
cm
`
0
A -.\-
co
-.\.
-.\.
0
C)
•g
1
II)C'JC\j0
-
-
IT
Lfl(0LI)CJ
It
C
0
1-1
0
::z
C)
C)
CI,
1.
C)
'-
__________
1100
J
0LI)tt)0
'i-'C')
U,
E
,-
-
C?1000
C)ILc)Nco
(0I'-OLC)(0
0
Co
C)
U,
.
C')
1-
Cj
-
D
(C
C
(0
Lt',N
co C\l
to
C',
c\j
0)
a.
C
CO
CO
CC
CO
.0
;
=
0
=
o
F-
4)
qq—
iQqI
—
a ?
CO
CD C
-
?
-o
a,
-
005
a
CM
(I)
LI
P.
CD00
ILL
Ct)OC)
co CD co
• •_IIc
a
•0
It)
•
l
?
a a
iI ?
NCr)
a
a
Eta.
d
Jr
O5 ?
IC)
CO
CRO 1011,
>Th0J
N-i-
JLC
)
a 01It)
C-
'10(C)
0
a
0
C!
a
C)
1
0)
0)
IC)
It)
co
a
a
0
co
a
?
Co)0)Cv)
U)
co
?
'4-;p
L
CM ?
j04C)C)
(.0
CIJ —
^. '* "' col
.
=!
=
=!
u ?
ö
cl
QO
Qq_
Cl)
C
Ca ?
—
ca
U CD
=.
I-
1-..
C))
C
a,
?
—
ca
= ?
0
o
cd co
Q q
-
In
a'
It)
r-
0
IC)
5
a
cci
o
a
0
•
-
a
c'J<
o
•
C)
?
a
CV)
04
cJ<
CD
CD
IC)
0
•5
a
CD
IdI ?
Cl)
0 ?
hIC)CD
1
Q
C)
?
?
>°—--
ajico
a
cr
o
o
oao
CD
C'J
N- CDCJ
o
—
_
o
a
C
cc%J
c
f
)
LO
cJ<
c'J<
o
_jLOj3
a
U4
C\j
ow
LII ?
oW
•
U)
c
'
J
<
CO
c'J<
a'-'
'
•;l
0
'-;l
Igci3
o
Co
co N
0
1
Lt)CJ.—
C!
ION0
r-or-
a
a
-i-CD
0
a
(\J
CD
1
N-,-
-i-
a
1
N
It)
?
Ict
LO LO ?
.-LC)C)
IC)
(D
?
?
I
OIC)LC)r-
q
q .- .- N-
?
C) .-
a
a
?
?
,JciJ
It
C\J
-'o
0
1
CD ?
?
'-1
J.-c'c\J
co 0) co
,—
?
1
ClCD4
co CO co
Itt
CJ
U,
0)•JCD
?
ClO(DCD
o:1ct,
'4
?
Cl CD CJ CD CD
?
cl -i
— N CD
N ?
J
N co co 04
?
C\I IC) N
It
?
C') ?
It)
(C)LC)(C)
OC,)
