1. Page 1
    2. Page 2
    3. Page 3
    4. Page 4
    5. Page 5
    6. Page 6

 
.
January 24, 2000
March 6, 2000
April 3, 2000
May 12, 2000
June 2, 2000
June 16, 2000
July 28, 2000
September 22, 2000
November 8, 2000
December 7, 2000
S.O1-31
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
?
Office of the Registrar
?
Memorandum
From: Nick Heath, Secretary
Senate Appeals Board
For Information
To: ?
Senate
Subject: Senate Appeals Board
?
Date: April 25, 2001
Annual Report for 2000
The Board considers cases wherein a student or former student feels aggrieved by the
decision of a faculty, department or other administrative unit relating to a registration in
courses, withdrawal from the University, eligibility for graduation, approval to a program
or matter relating to academic standing, when special circumstances are present.
The Senate Appeals Board met ten times in 2000 reviewing a total of 12 appeal cases, of
which 2 were not resolved by the end of the year. There were 18 appeal cases in 1999; 16
appeal cases reviewed in 1998; 19 appeal cases in 1997; and 16 appeal cases in 1996.
Thomas du Payrat, Chair, SAB
?
Nick Heath, Secretary, SAB
Dates of Meetin
g
in 2000:
SAB agreed to meet monthly, or when there is sufficient business to warrant a meeting.
Membership:
Chair - Elected by Senate Apneals Board:
Thomas du Payrat
Vice-Chair - Elected by Senate Appeals Board:
Lee Hanlan
.
Current Facult
y
Members Elected b
y
Senate:
Rina Zazkis
Hilmar Pabel
Martin Hahn (Alternate)
Lee Hanlan (Alternate)
Members whose terms ended during 2000:
Rolf Mathewes - May
3
1,2000
Current Student Members Elected b
y
Senate
Sameh Al-N atour
Leeanna Simons
Graham Percival (Alternate)
Narendra Pachkhede (Alternate)
Leanne Sersun - May 31, 2000
Dan Preece - August 31, 2000
Bill England - June 5 - August 31, 2000
.12

 
Senate Appeal Board
Annual Report for 2000
Page 2
General
SAB met on 2 June 2000 with some members of SCUS to discuss the proposed revised
procedures for handling withdrawal
requests.
Procedure
Each appeal is first screened to determine whether special circumstances are present. All
appeals are first heard in-camera (written form only - Stage 1) and some are resolved at
that stage. If the SAB is unable to give a positive judgment at Stage 1, and if the student
has requested an in-person hearing, the case is decided at a hearing at which the student or
a representative is able to present evidence and answer questions (Stage 2). Most hearings
last about 20 - 30 minutes.
.
This process resulted in the following action in 2000:
Appeal Type
Complete course
wid
during semester
Insufficient
Grounds for
Appeal
or
Re-opening
Resolved
at
Stage
1
Resolved
at
Stage 2
Cancelled
Unresolved
Retroactive Withdrawal
3
1
1
1
Selective w/d during semester
__________
Selective retroactive withdrawal
2
Change academic standing
Program Entry
Other
Total
4
2
3
1
2
Summary:
Appeals
Sustained
3
Appeals
Denied
2
Insufficient Grounds
4
Cancelled
1
Unresolved
2
Total
12
r
Isp
?
0

 
-
-
U
0)
VO
V
00
00
.
CO
o
4j
?
C3 ?
0)
V
oo
.
cc
.
0
0)
V
U
05
4- ?
V
:
QV
VV
V
V
'4-a
•.'.0.
i, ?
,
00
-
00
(0
' ?
0
sw
bO
co
0
0
-
u
0)V
uV0)0)O
4)
5
as
V
-v:
0
''•
V
?
,-
V ?
VV
- ?
.
V
i-i
u
Cl)
E
-111
(J)
co
cz
_1_.
_
i0
E
.oEoo
-
V
r.
0.
oc<
Q. ?
.
-to.
Il)
4_I ?
4I
to ?
co
0)0)
CO
?
CO
0
0)0)
.-
co
&)
?
co
0.o(JIt
V
0
72
1.-COO
u
VE ?
V'
V0
ow
V0)II
COO
coV
oaO0
VV
a
VCI)
.-
0
OIV
U
COC\V0
E—'-—
'O-
U
Co!
- 'o
Q.
o-
0
V
cVQ..
V _
CO CO
000
CO
V
-vO
-
V
-
V
co
"-
?
.
*-_<-,_
4I
°CO
o
tw
cz
-00O
V'CO
V
—:Eo
CU ?
0
V
•9V
VCOEO
C's
(5O
'.co
Il)
U0-V
<
Vo
a
II — V
V ?
C
?
CO
U) V
4I ?
V
VQ
4-V
CZ
?
O
CO'.cOV
''
V
Co
?
-0
COU)CO
0 —
co
1V
VO
0
"
V
—.cJ
Q.
0()
r.V
.-
CO...-
s_I ..
?
Co
_
-
?
- ?
o u v
'0 0
00V
Cl)
r.
VCO0
2V0
VU-
CO0)4_I
E4.1
VE
Ow
r.EOIOV U
v3-o
0III
4_I
In ?
In ?
co
.r'
-
-
•;4
0
0
0\
0'
0'
0'
0'
0
o\
0\
0\
0
CN 0'
o
C)
cu
0)
U)
(
"1
rf,
CO
U
.
0)
4-
(0
CO
co
It*
l_
CO
1...
Q.
I.-
Q.
s.-
CO
V
CO

 
0
'4-
0
od
0
z
V
0
V
4-
V
ad
cc
cc
2
2
U
Vcc
-
-
V
-
•• ?
-
V
V
I-
r1
4.1
4-
-i
CF)
4-
Cl)
(l)
4-
Cl)
w ?
4-
co
Cl)
V
—to
(I)
0
to
I-
co
U,
-1p
0
u
co ?
V
ct ?
co
c ?
-
o
-a
o
r..9C/)
V
's-V
Vo
-
0V
Uc
'-
?
.E-
V
----
V ?
cz
cz
V
'o:
-
to
o
Li
M
tko
cc
U)
—'°.Eo
to
.
?
..2
g
V
- ?
V
V r ?
_
aV
0
- ?
0 ?
c
V4-VE
h-
)-
SO
U
V ?
0
U V V
V0
-U_.._
r.
!- s -
-
IE
CC')
C.
Cl)
V
VU
U,Q
_
CISI
•ru-
C'stm
_.C/)
'2o
OVV
1
-
V
C')
-a ?
0
(A
E0
l)
VV
(I)
C.VV
r
IU,V
-
V
-00
C1)
0••
u
o (I) (I)
V
U
co ?
c
VO
U,
.
V ?
V
V-'
V
U
OV--
OO
In
U,
V
V
.V
Z=
?
-
co 0 to
E
V,-CVV
VHVV
CoU, ?
O
cCUcI
1-
U.
U,CV
<
Cl)
VV
?PV.__
UV
V .
?
C
VV
?
co
U,
U
VCV
c ?
—E
00
CtCt
UUCl)Ct
UCl)Cl)
Cl)
-S-
O•U,
QV
r-V
O'
0
0
-
00
0
as
CN
O
s
00
C,
HCta
Cl)
Cl)
C')
00
00
r1
C114
V
V
V
.
Ct
co
co
0
U
V
In

 
0)
0)
I..
()
0
cc
0
to
cc
.2
-
0
-
?
r4
0)
uu
0)
.0)___
0)
I-
0)
&)0
CIS
0
Cl)
-
0)
-
r.1 ?
c
U4-.---..
CO
U,
-
UU
CO0
o
b00
CO
4-
:i
-
U,
1J)0
-
v
V ?
U
co
?
U)
CO
v ?
o
OV
Q\CO
-
U - ?
0 - ?
=
-
-C
cz
0)CI
?
CO
o3
-
0J
CO
--
Ur-
E
V'-
-
-n;
.
u
CO
J.
U,OU
-2
I-
0V
co
(0 4 -
U,U)
0)
V0
U
4-p-.
0).
U, ?
a
-a
o
u
U,
(J)
-cz
80)
4- 4-
.._..
4-0.-.)
0(0
4-
°U,Q-0)
0
— 1_a
E<.
V
V
U0
00
90)(O
40.?
(I)U
coy
_4_l
a°4-
o_-_
4-4- 4-
CO
.E2
CO
*
r.
*U,
COS
V',
vC0
V
V4-CO
S..
m 0•o
1.1U,
U,0..
U)
cz
U-1
-<
0)0)
a
0)4-
CO..
a
Et
?
6D
4-V ?
0
4-
CO
o
U)
- I - -
ct
E
- ?
v
U)
O
2
4--c
O0
i_ao
-c
_V
VU,
-
-2
VQ
V
?
O
0
U
o.
•-V
0)
4 -
4)
u ?
C13
U)Q..
U)U)y
CO
0)CO
1_a
V•9
(004-
co
co ?
o
V ?
Qr,
0
UU
0
-
4.1(/)
In
cc
:3
?
Ct ? t o
u
0)
czx
4--
4-w
cu
CO-bO
CO ?
.
COa0
?
-
°°°.
8.
0)0 ?
CO
5 -uV
V(0Q
0)
5-
VV
V '
?
CO
.
U
co ?
0.
0Oc
-
F-
co
4- U,
4-5-
0) ?
1l
-Q..
'1
ct
0
0
co
0
0
'4
d0
.o '
. .o
.
?
U)
o
0
0
0
o
0
C))
P.
c1)
0. ?
co
6
VCOVU
0)
0)
Q\
0
U..,
-4
cc
0Vy
o)
U&)OCfl
(
C`4
5-
4-
00
00
S
S
I) ?
II ?
U ?
II ?
II ?
U ?
U
V
-
E
V
-
5-
0)
-
5-
V
-
5..
0)
s..
V
0)
0)
V
E
E
4-
-
-
0)
u
0
.
CO
0)
V
0
0
0)
V
O0
&,cr
C/)
C))
z
z
44
V
to
CO
P.

 
S.O1-32
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
.
?
Senate Committee on University Priorities
Memorandum
TO: Senate
RE:
Centre détudes francophones
Quebec-Pacifique
FROM:
John Waterhouse,
Vice President, Aca
DATE: 15 March 2001
C
Attached is a proposal from Dr. John Pierce, Dean of Arts for the establishment of a
Centre d'études francophones Quebec-Pacifique as a Schedule A Centre.
The Senate Committee on University Priorities reviewed the proposal at its
March 7, 2001 meeting. The proposal was unanimously approved on the condition
that assurances be provided that university resources will not be used to develop the
Centre and that the Centre will not solicit funding for collections that would more
appropriately be located in the library.
As indicated in the attached correspondence from Guy Poirier, these assurances
have been provided.
Once approved by Senate, the proposal is to be submitted to the Board of Governors.
Motion
That Senate approves and recommends to the Board of Governors the
establishment of the Centre d'études francophones Quebec-Pacifique as
outlined in document SCUP 00-38.
Attachments.
c. J
.
Pierce
G. Poirier
J .
Waterhouse
B. Clayman

Back to top